BERKHAMSTED
TOWN  COUNCIL

 

2004–2005 Archives of Planning Minutes [Part 1]

HOME/INDEX PAGECOMMUNITY LINKSPICTURE BOOK BERKHAMSTED
ABOUT BERKHAMSTED CURRENT EVENTSPUBLICATION SCHEME
ALLOTMENTSDIRECTORY OF INFORMATION LINKSSEARCH the SITE
ARCHIVESFREEDOM OF INFORMATIONSUBJECT INDEX
CARP LOCAL GOVERNMENT STRUCTUREYOUTH COUNCIL
CIVIC CENTREMEETINGS CALENDAR 
CONTACT USMEETINGS NEXT (Current) AGENDA 
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIPMEETINGS PREVIOUS (current) MINUTES 

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Monday 22nd November 2004 at 7.30 p.m. 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby - Chairman

                                    Geraldine Corry

                                    J. Critcher

                                    J. Lythgoe

                                    H. McCloskey

                                    G. Stevens

 

NON-COMMITTEE MEMBER: 

Councillor                   Betty Patterson (left at 8.00 p.m.)

                       

OFFICER:   

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk 

 

307/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 

There were no apologies for absence.

 

308/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

The Chairman declared a personal interest in planning application 4/2428/04 - Works to trees at 38 Kitsbury Road.

 

309/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 1st November 2004 were agreed and signed by the Chairman subject to the word “contrary” being added to the third line of the recommendation for 4/2411/04.  The minutes were amended.

 

310/04            MATTERS ARISING 

                        Vide 300/04 – Enforcement matters

The Chairman reported that in respect of 37 Kings Road the shed on the boundary had not been removed but had been reduced to 4 feet.  He asked for the Enforcement Officer to be notified.

Vide Item 303/04 – Planning Application 4/2411/04

88 Kings Road

Following representations from the Planning Officer the recommendation was slightly adjusted to read as follows:

Object as the information provided on the application form said that the existing building was 138 square metres with the new floor space being 280, yet the lost floor space would be 1485.  It is therefore insufficient to judge the full impact of the development proposal and is therefore contrary to Policy 11 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.

 

311/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

Notification had been received from RICS East of England that 26 entries had been received as Landmarked buildings in the East of England.  It had been decided not to choose a winner but to celebrate the diversity of those buildings by putting together a booklet containing photographs and details. 

Notification had been received from Planning Officer, Yvonne Edwards, that application 4/1204/04 at 10 Shrublands Road had been granted by the Development Control Committee. 

Notification had been received from NALC that the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister had published a revised circular relating to the negotiation of Planning Obligations under Section 106 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990.  Copies of the consultation were available at www.odpm.gov.uk/planning.  Comments were required by 18th January 2005. 

A response had been received from Planning Enforcement Officer Egan to the list of outstanding enforcement issues notified to him following the last planning meeting.  The response had been copied to the Chairman.

 

312/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 

There were 15 members of the public present.  Mr. E. Dyer said that he was intrigued as to who was proposing to obtain independent advice concerning the safety issues as a result of the development at 77 High Street.  He hoped that this was not a Town Council initiative as Hertfordshire Highways had abrogated their responsibilities. 

Mr. Dyer said that there was mention of Section 106 Agreements under Chairman’s Communications and it was time that developers with whom agreements had been reached were obliged to make good damage caused to the highway during development.  He cited Manor Street and Three Close Lane as examples.

 

313/04            ROAD NAMING – SEVEN NEW HOUSES OFF OAKWOOD 

                        Following discussion it was agreed to recommend: 

                        Hockeridge View 

As the Town Council’s preferred name for the new road off Oakwood.

                        Action Town Clerk

 

314/04            TO CONSIDER EMPLOYING AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT TO ADVISE ON PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE SAFETY AT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 77 HIGH STREET (4/2371/04) 

Members were informed that this application was due to be heard by the Development Control Committee on Thursday 2nd December 2004 and it was agree to defer consideration of the employment of an independent consultant until the decision was known.  It was further agreed that the Town Planning Committee would be represented at the Committee meeting and that the representative would wish to address the Committee.

                        Action Town Clerk

 

315/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS  

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED 

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity.

 

4/1938/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS & ADDITIONAL PLAN (no. 1354/18) - Alterations and extensions to allow conversion into seven apartments and construction of eight apartments over car parking with glazed link to Mill at Castle Mill, Lower Kings Road.  (PN) 

Object due to the adverse impact of the visual appearance, design and bulk on both the Town and Canal-scape.  The extension is obtrusive and should not dominate the appearance of the original Mill.  The Committee consider that any conversion, including the plant room, should be sympathetic to the existing architectural features and be no higher than the existing building.

 

4/1993/04/RET          AMENDED PLANS – Patios and privacy screens at various plots at The Mansion, Berkhamsted Hill.  (JC) 

                                    Mr. Cyril Collins was present along with a number of residents of Castle Village to object to that part of the application which required the patios to be reduced in size.  He said that this was a retrospective application which contained a number of errors and omissions and apparent misunderstandings by the Planning Department Case Officer.  The screens which had been erected were not fences and did not enclose any part of the land.  They were therefore not contrary to any requirements made by the developer or the local authority at the construction stage.  The screens provided privacy to the residents and they should be retained. 

                                    Object to the reduced patio area which would be insufficient for adequate wheelchair access.

 

4/2246/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS – Loft conversion with front rooflight and rear dormer at 23 Queens Road.  (YE) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2271/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS -  Rear extension 200 High Street. (YE). 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2371/04/FUL          ADDITIONAL PLAN – Demolition and replacement of one two-bedroom house and the construction of nine two-bedroom houses at 77 High Street. (YE). 

Object to the design of No. 77, which is inappropriate, as the ridgeline and fenestration should match that of the adjoining properties and not that of the demolished property.  It is therefore contrary to policy 11d of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991 -2011. 

Object due to the unsafe nature of the access to and from the site, 

 

4/2406/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – First floor rear extension and change of use of part of first and second floor to residential unit at 126 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2428/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY – Works to trees at 38 Kitsbury Road.  (RH)                                   

The Chairman declared a personal interest in this application and stood down from the Chair which was taken by Councillor Geraldine Corry. 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2438/04/FUL          Conversion of upper floor offices to form twenty flats (AMENDED SCHEME incorporating two additional flats) at 221-233 High Street.  (RF) 

                                    Councillor Geraldine Corry asked for her objection to the two additional studio flats to be recorded. 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2448/04/FUL          Change of use of part of residential unit to Chiropody Practice at 260 High Street.  (PN) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2450/04/FHA         Part two-storey and part single storey side extension, two storey rear extension, single storey rear extension, porch and new front boundary wall and rails at The Dyke, Graemesdyke Road.  (FB) 

                                    No Objection.  The Tree Officer should be made aware that trees to be felled are not covered by a TPO.

 

4/2451/04/FUL          Installation of new shop front at 227-229 High Street.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection.  The Committee noticed that the position of the existing projecting sign is between 227 and 229 High Street and not 225 and 227 as shown on the plan. 

 

4/2452/04/RET          Patios and privacy screens at various plots at The Mansion, Berkhamsted Hill.  (JC) 

                                    Mr. Cyril Collins was present along with a number of residents of Castle Village to object to that part of the application, which required the patios to be reduced in size.  He said that this was a retrospective application, which contained a number of errors and omissions and apparent misunderstandings by the Planning Department Case Officer.  The screens which had been erected were not fences and did not enclose any part of the land.  They were therefore not contrary to any requirements made by the developer or the local authority at the construction stage.  The screens provided privacy to the residents and they should be retained. 

                                    No Objection to the retention of the patio and privacy screens as they improve the appearance in that they conceal the prominent and slightly overbearing white conservatories.

 

4/2456/04/FHA         Single storey side extension at 4 Cedar Way.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2467/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at 16 New Street.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2473/04/FHA         Loft conversion with rear dormer at 53 Kitsbury Road.  (YE) 

Object because the dormer would have an overbearing impact on the roof by reason of its design, scale and siting in that it is less than a metre from the flank wall of No 54.  It would fail to complement or be in proportion with the existing building and so would appear out of keeping with, and have an adverse effect on, the character and appearance of this part of the Berkhamsted Conservation Area.

 

4/2478/04/TPO         Works to trees at Town End, Shootersway Lane.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection to the maintenance of the trees but the proposed works were considered to be excessive. 

 

4/2487/04/FHA         Rear extension over existing garage at 152 George Street.  (AP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2489/04/FHA         First floor side extension at Vaughan House, 1 Shootersway Park.  (EP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2493/04/FUL          Dwelling adj. Hardrick, Shootersway.  (FB) 

                                    Mr. P. Sharper, a local resident, was present to object to the application and produced plans for members of the Committee to show the effect of a three-storey building between two adjacent two-storey existing dwellings.  He said that the amended plans showed that the building was wider than the previous one, which had been turned down, and the side access was insufficient at 2’ 6”. 

Object as the height of the building at three storeys is in excess of the two recommended in the Supplementary Guidelines for Shootersway, and therefore has an adverse impact by reason of its design, on the area; the space on either side of the single storey rear extension is only a metre which is overbearing by its design by having a larger foot print than the front of the house.  It is therefore contrary to the guidelines set down in Appendix 3 paragraph (iii) Layout and Design of residential areas relating to Spacing of dwellings with regard to the cramped layout and loss of privacy.

 

4/2494/04/FHA         Loft conversion and two rear dormer windows at 5 Boxwell Road.  (BL) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2503/04/TPO         Works to trees at South Lodge, Shootersway Lane.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection to the maintenance of the trees but the proposed works were considered to be excessive.

 

4/2509/04/FHA         Two-storey side with single storey front and rear extension at 146 Bridgewater Road.  (JA) 

Object to the single storey front extension only in terms of design and bulk which therefore harms the surrounding and adjoining neighbourhood, through visual intrusion and loss of privacy.  Contrary to Policy 11d of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.

 

4/2522/04/FHA         Front dormer at 24 Valley Road (SS). 

Object to the positioning of the dormer as it is 0.6m from the party wall of No. 22 and therefore less than the minimum of 1m from the party wall.  Contrary to Appendix 7(vi) of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.

 

4/2524/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension at 10 Dellfield Close (BL). 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2526/04/ADV         Internally illuminated shop front fascia sign and projecting sign at 188 High Street. (TP). 

Object as internally illuminated fascia signs and internally illuminated projecting signs are inappropriate in a Conservation Area and contrary to the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.

 

4/2530/04/FUL          Change of use of ground floor from commercial to residential and creation of three bed dwelling at The News, 279 High Street. (YE). 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2535/04/TPO         Works to trees at 15 Oakwood (BC). 

Object to the work to T2 as the clearance over the pavement is good and that there is no overhang of the road.  The Committee is concerned at the proposed works to T1 following the maintenance carried out last year in that the balance and appearance of the tree would be damaged.

 

4/2570/04/RET          15m monopole with three antennae, one dish, radio equipment housing and ancillary development at Berkhamsted Town Football Club, Broadwater.  (BL) 

                                    No Objection to temporary permission being granted.  Consideration should be given to co-locating with the existing mast in the Railway Station car park.

 

4/2572/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Fell tree at 14 Montague Road.  (RF) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2581/04/FHA         Garage at 5 Coombe Gardens.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2595/04/TPO         Works to tree at 19 Oakwood.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2607/04/ADV         Non-illuminated signage at Berkhamsted Sports Centre, Lagley Meadow, Douglas Gardens.  (PN) 

                                    Object to two signs due to excessive clutter and adverse impact on the street scene.  One sign would be acceptable which must not be positioned in such a way that the existing saplings are damaged nor in a position that would require trees to be cut down to create sight lines.

 

4/2610/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at Trees, Kitsbury Terrace.  (BC) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2630/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension and single storey rear extension at 4 Upper Ashlyns Road.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2636/04/FHA         First floor extension to garage at 37 Kings Road.  (BL) 

                                    No Objection.  The Committee would recommend that the start of works notice be reduced from five years to 6 months to ensure that the existing workshop that has been refused permission is removed.

 

316/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

                        The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

317/04            CLOSE OF MEETING   

 

                        The meeting closed at 9.00 p.m.

 

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Monday 1st November 2004 at 7.30 p.m. 

 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby - Chairman

                                    Geraldine Corry (7.38 p.m.)

                                    J. Critcher

                                    J. Lythgoe

 

SUBSTITUTE MEMBER:  

Councillor                   L. Briand

                       

OFFICER:                

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk 

 

 

297/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE  

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors McCloskey and Stevens.  

298/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

There were no declarations of interest regarding items on the agenda.

 

299/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 11th October 2004 were agreed and signed by the Chairman.

 

300/04            MATTERS ARISING 

Vide Item 293/04 – Application 4/2204/04 Loughrigg, Gravel Path

The Chairman pointed out that the width of the grass verge was wrongly recorded as nearly 1 metre and should have been recorded as 2.5 metres. 

                        Vide Item 269/04 Enforcement from 31st August 2004

                        The following matters were still outstanding: 

Lloyds Bank removal of collar round cash point.

E/O3/450                   No progress.

 

Brookes Restaurant unauthorised sign.

E/04/130                    No progress.

 

Crystal Palace Public House unauthorised decking in car park.

Refused on 25th March 2004 and has not been appealed.

 

79 High Street unauthorised shuttering.

Refused on 31st March 2004 and has not been appealed.

 

Blockbusters, 283 High street blue shuttering.

 

Repositioning of advertisement board on Listed Building at 103-109 High Street.

 

To which should be added

4/0718/04/FHA         side extension to garage at 37 Kings Road.  refused in June, and has not appealed

4/0935/04/FHA         Garden shed at 37 Kings Roadrefused in June, and has not appealed 

It was agreed that all these outstanding enforcement issues should be referred to the Head of Planning Enforcement at Dacorum Borough Council.

                        Action Town Clerk

 

                        The following matters have been resolved.

Magoos unauthorised external sign (E/04/129) has been removed 

The large internally illuminated green box has been constructed between Shakti News, Charles Street, for the storage of newspapers has been replaced with a smaller discrete bin

                       

301/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

A letter had been received from Dacorum Borough Council notifying a Tree Preservation Order on land at 271-273 High Street as of the 18th October 2004.

 

302/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

There were 14 members of the public present in relation to two applications.  Members were addressed by a nominated spokesman in respect of 4/2371/04, by two members of the public in respect of 4/2050/04 and by one member of the public in respect of 4/2337/04.

 

303/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS 

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED  

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity.

 

4/1801/04/LBC         ADDITIONAL PLANS – Internal redecoration repairs to Gable End.  Redecoration of front elevation and signage at the Curry Garden, 29 High Street.  (TP) 

No objection to the external works already carried out.  As no plans had been submitted to show the original layout of the interior the Council objects to those works as historic fabric may have been irretrievably and unnecessarily destroyed.

 

4/2042/04/ADV         AMENDED PLANS – Externally illuminated fascia sign, window sign and externally illuminated projecting sign at 346 High Street.  (FB) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2042/04/ADV         AMENDED PLANS – Externally illuminated fascia sign, window sign and externally illuminated projecting sign at 346 High Street.  (FB)     Second set. 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2050/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – New dwelling at 21 Swing Gate Lane.  (BL) 

Two local residents were present to object to this application on the following grounds: 

a.                  The proposal introduced a terrace into a row of semi-detached properties.

b.                  No alterations had been made to resolve the on-street parking problem for residents which was severe at school opening and closing times and when events were held.

c.                  The shared access compromised security.

d.                  The proposed new dwelling was smaller than no.21 which had already been reduced in size in comparison to its neighbours.

e.                  The new dwelling would be the only house in Swing Gate Lane where wheelie bins would have to remain outside the front. 

Object due to the adverse visual appearance this additional house would have being added on to one of several attractive semi-detached houses.  The doors and windows do not align with numbers 21 and 23.  If built the additional crossover would result in a reduction of the availability of on-street parking.  The provision of a right of way through the rear garden of the proposed development would lead to loss of privacy to the neighbouring property.

 

4/2129/04/ADV         AMENDED PLANS – (Amended Scheme) Non-illuminated signage at 168 High Street.  (BL) 

No Objection to the application but existing signage already in place is illuminated and must be removed.

 

4/2277/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension and deck at 6 Greene Walk.  (EP) 

Object as there is insufficient information and appropriately detailed plans to enable the Committee to determine whether the raised decking would cause an unacceptable loss of privacy onto the adjoining garden of No. 5.  It is therefore contrary to Policies 11 and 11d of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991 – 2011.

 

4/2309/04/FUL          Change of use to offices at first floor level at 168 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2323/04/TPO         Works to trees at 11 Greystoke Close.  (NG) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2331/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension at 17 Tortoiseshell Way.  (SS) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2333/04/OUT         Detached dwelling and garage land adj. 36 Upper Ashlyns Road.  (RF) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2337/04/FUL          Conversion of existing church into three apartments at St. Andrews U R Church, Chapel Street.  (YE) 

                                    Angela Wheeldon said that the extra windows at the back and on the east side of the development would overlook the neighbours gardens.  The neighbours were also concerned about extra noise as the property was being converted to residential use from a Church. 

                                    Object due to the three dormer windows on the east elevation, which will overlook the properties in Castle Mews.

                                   

4/2338/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension and internal alterations at 10 Anglefield Road.  (YE) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2340/04/FHA         Single storey side extension at 15 Hill View.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2366/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension and alteration to existing side extension at 5 Princes Close.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2371/04/FUL          Demolition and replacement of one two-bedroom house and the construction of nine two-bedroom houses at 77 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    There were a number of local residents present to object to the application represented by Mr. Colin Garrett.  Mr. Garrett provided a report for the Chairman and quoted Councillor Ian Reay, Dacorum Borough Council Planning Portfolio Holder, from the most recent edition of the Berkhamsted Review.  The main objections put forward on behalf of local residents were that the development would not enhance the Conservation Area nor would they benefit the community at large.  The access was still dangerous and unsuitable and would cause further deterioration of traffic congestion.  He urged members of the Committee not to be led astray by the spurious opinions of experts who had commented on the proposals but to use their own common sense and local knowledge to recommend that the application should be refused. 

Object to the design of No 77 as its design is inappropriate as the ridge line and fenestration should match that of the adjoining properties and not that of the demolished property and is therefore contrary to policy 11d of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991 to 2011. 

Object due to the unsafe nature of the access to and from the site, 

It is still strongly recommended that a site visit takes place to include Ward Councillors of the Town Council, representatives of Hertfordshire Highways, the Planning Officer and a representative of the developer, at a peak traffic time during the school term in order to fully appreciate the dangerous nature of the access/egress. 

 

4/2372/04/CAC         Demolition of building at 77 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    Object as consent for demolition should not be given unless there are acceptable and detailed plans for any redevelopment as laid down in paragraph 4.27 of PPG15.

 

4/2386/04/LDP         Conversion of garage to habitable room at 15A Middle Road.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2387/04/RET          Retention of satellite dish at 3 McDougall Road.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2394/04/FHA         Demolish conservatory and construction of single storey rear extension at 87 Shrublands Avenue.  (BL) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2397/04/FHA         Two-storey and single storey rear extensions and alterations at South Lodge, Shootersway Lane.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection

  

4/2399/04/ADV         Internally illuminated fascia sign and projecting sign at 162-166 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    Object to both the internally illuminated fascia and projecting signs, as they are inappropriate and unsuitable for the Conservation Area and contrary to Dacorum Borough Council policy.  The advice of the Conservation Officer should be sought on the materials proposed for the fascia.

 

4/2406/04/FUL          First floor rear extension and change of use of part of first and second floor to residential unit at 126 High Street. (YE). 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2411/04/FUL          Demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a detached dwelling with double detached garage with attic to front at 88 Kings Road (JA). 

                                    Object as the information provided is insufficient to judge the full impact of the development proposal and is therefore to Policy 11 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.

 

4/2445/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at 9 Shrublands Road.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection

 

304/04            PLANNING APPEAL 

4/1047/04/FUL         

Change of use from agricultural land to private golf practice area

at land adj. to Berkhamsted Golf Club, The Common.   

The planning appeal was noted and no further comments were necessary.

 

305/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

306/04            CLOSE OF MEETING 

                        The meeting closed at 8.35 p.m.
 

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Monday 11th October 2004 at 7.30 p.m. 

 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby - Chairman

                                    Geraldine Corry

                                    J. Critcher

                                    J. Lythgoe

                                    G. Stevens           

OFFICER:                  

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk 

 

287/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE  

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor McCloskey.

 

288/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

Councillor Stevens declared an interest in application 4/2161/04 as a friend of the applicant.

 

289/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 20th September 2004 were agreed at Full Council and signed by the Chairman.

 

290/04            MATTERS ARISING 

                        Vide Item 251/04 – Landmark buildings

The Chairman confirmed that the Town Council’s entry in relation to 173 High Street (formerly known as Figgs) had been submitted. 

 

291/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

Notification had been received that appeals in relation to planning applications 4/0847/04 and 4/0848/04 had been withdrawn but the appeals for 4/1176/04 and 4/1177/04 would go ahead at the inquiry at a date to be confirmed.

An agenda had been received and circulated for the Annual Planning Seminar with Town and Parish councils to be held at 6.30 p.m. on 26th October 2004 in the Bulbourne Room. 

The appeal by Berkhamsted Town Council against the failure of Dacorum Borough Council to determine the planning application for the skateboard park on Velvet Lawn had been acknowledged by the Planning Inspectorate.

 

292/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 

There were four members of the public present.  Angela Wheeldon asked if the bodged brickwork on Bridge 99 opposite the Crystal Palace public house had to be accepted.  The parapet was yellow.  It was blue on one side and it was a dog’s breakfast.  It was agreed that Councillor Corry and the Town Clerk would visit the scene and assess the problem.  If necessary it would be reported to the Enforcement Officers.

Action Councillor Corry and Town Clerk

 

293/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS 

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED  

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity.

 

4/1204/04/FHA         AMENDED & ADDITIONAL PLANS – Single storey side and rear extension at 10 Shrublands Road.  (YE) 

Object as there are insufficient drawings to show how the first floor roof profiles relate to either the front or rear extensions with No 12, as it appears to be higher and out of keeping with all the canopies on this row of eight houses.   It would therefore have an adverse impact on the appearance of the Conservation Area opposite.

4/2024/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – Demolish existing dwelling and construction replacement dwelling at South Gables, 22 Meadway (FB). 

The applicant was present and said that the plans had been resubmitted following discussions with residents and Dacorum Borough Council.  The plans had been amended and previous errors dealt with.  The residents committee and his neighbour had now withdrawn their objections. 

No Objection

 

4/2024/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – Demolish existing dwelling and construction replacement dwelling at South Gables, 22 Meadway.  (FB)  (second set) 

No Objection

 

4/2123/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS – First floor extension at 28 Gaveston Drive.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2152/04/FUL          Conversion of stable block to one dwelling and conversion of part of great barn to one dwelling and remainder to ancillary residential use at Castle Hill Farm, Castle Hill.  (JC)

                                     No Objection

 

4/2153/04/LBC         Conversion of stable block to one dwelling and conversion of part of great barn to one dwelling and remainder to ancillary residential use at Castle Hill Farm, Castle Hill.  (JC) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2161/04/FHA         Rear extension, replacement garage and new access at Morningside, Graemesdyke Road.  (BL) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2168/04/FHA         First floor rear extension and single storey front extension at 32 Orchard Avenue.  (BL) 

                                    No Objection

 

 

4/2169/04/FUL          Single storey extension, entrance lobby and new access at The Church of St. John The Evangelist, London Road, Bourne End.  (FB) 

                                    No Objection

                                    This recommendation does not include the car park, which does not appear in the description.

 

4/2178/04/FUL          Construction of two dwellings and alterations to Park House entrance, parking and bin store at Park House and land adj. Park Street.  (PN) 

Object to the visual appearance of the houses in that they are out of character with the adjoining houses, and to the adverse impact on the Conservation Area; Object to the loss of light suffered by No 16 with the upstairs window; Object as any increase in traffic in this narrow road would leave little facility for turning; Object as there is insufficient information to see how the proposed buildings relate in height to either Park House or the adjoining properties.   Any further drawings should show a ridge profile of the houses for that side of the street.

The applicant should be required to landscape the area as required on the original application and recommended by the Secretary of State

 

4/2186/04/FHA         Single storey side extension at 25 Kings Road.  (RF) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2192/04/FUL          Windows to ground and first floor at 254 High Street.  (RF) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2195/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at Berkley Court, Mill Street.  (YE) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2196/04/RES         Details of siting, design, landscaping, external appearance and means of access required by outline planning permission 4/0969/02 (New Hospice building, landscaped gardens, internal access road and car parking) at land at and near Golf Range, Shootersway.  (JC) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2197/04/TPO         Works to tree at Compass House, Gravel Path.  (RH) 

No Objection subject to the balance of the tree being maintained.

 

4/2204/04/FUL          Two detached houses r/o Loughrigg, Gravel Path.  (NG) 

Mr. R. Turner was present and made the following observations: 

1.                  The sewerage system was originally constructed for 16 homes and now served 23.  It occasionally overloads and was unlikely to be able to cope with a further development.

2.                  The grass verge was 100m long and nearly 1m wide and provided a 4 mile view over the valley.  Two cross-overs were proposed which needed to be constructed of hollow blocks to allow the grass to come through.

3.                  There was the potential for damage to be caused to the verge during construction.           

                                    No Objection

The applicant should be requested to finish the crossover in perforated concrete blocks to let the grass grow through to preserve the visual appearance of the green verge when viewed along the entire length. 

The developer should reinstate the grass verge to its condition prior to the commencement of any works.

           

4/2209/04/FUL          Extension and conversion to two dwellings adj. 3 to 4 Church Gates, Church Lane.  (FB) 

                                    Object on account of the adverse impact on the traffic capacity of the road network.  The road is too narrow for two cars to park beside the conversion especially if the outer car owner is absent and leaves little room for egress.

 

4/2216/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at 35 Charles Street.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection 

 

4/2220/04/TEL          FOR INFORMATION ONLY – Telecommunications lamppost and associated equipment cabinets at Streetlight 122, Chesham Road.  (BL) 

                                    No Objection subject to consideration being given to the possibility of sharing the new mast at the top of Swing Gate Lane.

 

4/2227/04/ADV         Illuminated and non-illuminated signage at Hall Park Service Station, London Road.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2236/04/FHA         Conservatory at 15 Murray Road.  (EP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2237/04/FHA         Two storey rear extension at 10 Crossways.  (SS) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2242/04/FHA         Two storey side and two storey rear extensions at 82 Greenway.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2246/04/FHA         Loft conversion with front rooflights and rear dormer at 23 Queens Road.  (YE) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2257/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Work to trees at 14 North Road.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2263/04/TPO         Works to trees at 80 Upper Hall Park.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection subject to the advice of the Tree Officer.

 

4/2264/04/FUL          Demolition and replacement warehouse at Aviation House, Northbridge Road.  (NG) 

Object as the proposed single storey extension is in front of the building line of the buildings backing onto the canal.  It is too close to the canal bank to allow access for the emergency services.  It would undermine all the work CARP has done in maintaining the rural aspect of the canalscape, in particular in relation to its height, mass and bulk.

 

4/2271/04/FUL          Rear extension at 200 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2272/04/FHA         Single and two storey rear extension at 67 Greenway.  (EP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2274/04/TPO         Fell tree at Copsem House, Graemesdyke Road.  (JA)                                   

Object as its removal would be harmful as the trees bordering Kilfillan are in a prominent position and removal would spoil the appearance of this part of Graemesdyke Road, unless the Tree Officer agrees that the tree should be felled, in which case it should be replaced with a mature tree.

 

4/2281/04/TPO         Works to trees at Lane End House, Shootersway Lane.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection subject to the balance of the Oak and Ash being maintained.

 

294/04            PLANNING APPEAL 

4/1124/04/FHA         Rear first floor conservatory at 4A, Cowper Road.                                   

The planning appeal was noted.

 

295/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

                        The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

296/04            CLOSE OF MEETING 

                        The meeting closed at 8.35 p.m.

 

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Monday 20th September 2004 at 7.30 p.m. 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby - Chairman

                                    Geraldine Corry

                                    J. Critcher

                                    Mrs. H. McCloskey 

           

SUBSTITUTE MEMBER: 

Councillor                   G. Lanchin

Betty Patterson 

 

EX-OFFICIO MEMBER: 

Councillor                   P.G. Gibbs – Town Mayor 

 

OFFICER:                  

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk

 

277/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE  

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Lythgoe and Stevens.

 

278/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

There were no declarations of interest regarding items on the agenda.

 

279/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 31st August 2004 were agreed and signed by the Chairman.

 

280/04            MATTERS ARISING 

                        Vide Item 269/04 – Enforcement matters

                        All matters raised were still outstanding.

 

281/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

A letter had been received from Tony Pickard, Planning Officer, concerning application 4/1755/04 which was granted by the Development Control Committee subject to a condition that work shall only take place on Monday to Friday between 8.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m., Saturday 8.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. and not on Sundays, Bank Holidays or Public Holidays. 

The Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991/2011 had been formally adopted and a copy was available in the office.

 

282/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION  

There were 9 members of the public present in relation to various planning applications who were given the opportunity to speak when the application was dealt with.

 

283/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS 

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED  

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity.

 

4/1873/04/DRC         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Details of landscaping as required by conditions 3, 4 and 5 of planning permission 4/0260/03 (7 dwellings and access road) at 20 & 21 and r/o 18 & 19 and r/o 22 & 23 Oakwood.  (PN) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2020/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at 12 Montague Road.  (RB) 

                                    No Objection except that the extent of the works to the Rowan may be excessive

 

4/2022/04/FHA         Detached double garage at Rushwood, Shootersway.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2024/04/FUL          Demolish existing dwelling and construction replacement dwelling at South Gables, 22 Meadway.  (FB) 

                                    Object due to the visual appearance of the proposed building by reason of its size and bulk which does not relate to neighbouring houses and the semi-rural nature of the neighbourhood.  The integral garage appears to be in front of the building line.

 

4/2031/04/FHA         Second storey side extension and new pitched roof over front flat roof at 2 Lochnell Road.  (BC) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2036/04/ADV         Illuminated sign at 167 High Street.  (TP) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2037/04/FHA         Driveway and steps at 72 Upper Hall Park.  (SS) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2038/04/ADV         Externally illuminated fascia and projecting sign at Abbey National plc, 230 High Street.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2041/04/FUL          Shopfront, ventilation systems and external compressors at 346 High Street.  (FB) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2042/04/ADV         Internally illuminated fascia sign, window sign and projecting sign at 346 High Street.  (FB) 

                                    Object to the illuminated signage as it is internally illuminated and contrary to the Local Plan for signage within the Conservation Area.

 

4/2044/04/ADV         Signage at 163-165 High Street.  (BC) 

                                    Object to the visual appearance of the large advertisement board between the first floor windows which is out of scale with the adjoining windows, creates clutter with the projecting signs and harms the character of the Listed Building and Conservation Area.

 

4/2047/04/LBC         Signage at 163-165 High Street.  (BC) 

                                    Object to the visual appearance of the large advertisement board between the first floor windows which is out of scale with the adjoining windows, creates clutter with the projecting signs and harms the character of the Listed Building and Conservation Area. 

                                    The applicant should be required to remove the paint from the brown glazed bricks of this early 17C Grade II Listed Building which were painted without approval by the previous occupiers.  This action should be taken to safeguard the special architectural or historic interest of the building.

 

4/2050/04/FUL          New dwelling at 21 Swing Gate Lane.  (BL) 

                                    Five local residents were present to object to the application.  A spokesperson said that this proposed development was in the middle of a row of neat semi-detached houses.  The proposal would close space between them and introduce a terrace.  The proposed house was much larger than others in Swing Gate Lane and was of a bulky construction.  The privacy of no. 19 would be compromised and some street parking would be reduced adding to the severe parking problems particularly associated with the nearby school. 

                                    Another local resident pointed out that there did not appear to be a rear access to the existing house at no. 21.  This would cause problems especially with wheelie bins. 

                                    Object due to the adverse visual appearance this additional house would have being added on to one of several attractive semi-detached houses.  The doors and windows do not align with numbers 21 and 23.  If built the additional crossover would result in a reduction of the availability of on-street parking.  No provision seems to have been made for rear access to no. 21.

 

4/2054/04/FUL          New access to Shootersway and construction of dwelling at 27 & 28 Oakwood.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection but members were surprised that there was no garage for a house of this size.

 

4/2057/04/FHA         Two rear dormer windows and two front rooflights to enable conversion of loft space at 5 Boxwell Road.  (BL) 

                                    Object as the proposed two rear dormer windows would detract from the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the Conservation Area.  “The development as proposed would set an undesirable precedent for an unacceptable number of dormer windows that would have a cumulative and detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.  Therefore the proposal is contrary to the principles of good design set out in policies 8, 9 and 110 of the Local Borough Plan.”  

                                    Object as the two roof lights on the front elevation would detract from the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the Conservation Area.  “If permitted, this element of the proposal would set an undesirable precedent for further such inappropriate development that would have a cumulative and detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.  Therefore, the proposal is contrary to the principles of good design set out in policies 8, 9 and 110 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.”

 

4/2061/04/FHA         First floor rear extension and front porch at 50 Upper Hall Park.  (BC) 

                                    Object to the first floor extension which would result in an unacceptable loss of light into the kitchen (a principle room) of no. 52.  Object due to the degree of overlooking and therefore loss of privacy to the gardens of no. 48 and 52 caused by the full length first floor rear balcony windows.

 

4/2102/04/CAC         Demolition of dwelling at 20 Montague Road.  (PN) 

                                    Three local residents were present to object to the application.  Objections were raised as follows: 

                                    The proposal was out of keeping with the detached houses in close proximity to it.  The mass and height of the development would significantly affect light to houses lower down in Montague Road.  Windows in the new development would cause overlooking and compromise privacy.  The development was not suitable in the Conservation Area.  The development would result in an increase in traffic in a road where driving was sometimes dangerous and parking was at a premium.

                                    Object until there is an acceptable plan for any redevelopment in the Conservation Area as laid out in paragraph 4.27 of PPG5.

 

4/2103/04/FUL          Demolition of existing dwelling and construction of 2 semi-detached dwellings at 20 Montague Road.  (PN)                                   

Three local residents were present to object to the application.  Objections were raised as follows: 

                                    The proposal was out of keeping with the detached houses in close proximity to it.  The mass and height of the development would significantly affect light to houses lower down in Montague Road.  Windows in the new development would cause overlooking and compromise privacy.  The development was not suitable in the Conservation Area.  The development would result in an increase in traffic in a road where driving was sometimes dangerous and parking was at a premium. 

                                    Object due to the impact of the proposed development by means of its adverse appearance being semi-detached town houses and therefore out of character with this part of Montague Road.  Also that it would have an overbearing affect on the well designed Rosehill houses.  The height of the proposed development could cause the loss of privacy by overlooking.

 

4/2109/04/FHA         Mono pitched roof to existing garage at 8 Millfield.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2123/04/FHA         First floor extension at 28 Gaveston Drive.  (JA) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2125/04/FHA         Loft conversion and first floor extension at 48 Durrants Road.  (RF) 

                                    Object to the side dormer only as it would have an adverse impact on the visual appearance of the street scene.

 

4/2126/04/FHA         Change of use, garden area to parking space at 54 High Street.  (RF) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2129/04/ADV         Illuminated signage at 168 High Street.  (BL) 

                                    Object to the illuminated signage as it is internally illuminated and contrary to the Local Borough Plan for signage in the Conservation Area.

 

4/2130/04/FUL          Replacement shopfront at 168 High Street.  (BL) 

                                    Object to the illuminated signage as it is internally illuminated and contrary to the Local Borough Plan for signage in the Conservation Area.

 

4/2140/04/TPO         Works to trees at 4 Millfield.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection subject to a proper balance being maintained.

 

4/2147/04/FUL          Floodlighting at Berkhamsted Lawn Tennis & Squash Club, Broadwater.  (NG) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2148/04/FUL          Erection of fence to court at Berkhamsted Lawn Tennis & Squash Club, Broadwater.  (NG) 

                                    No Objection

 

4/2149/04/FHA         Two storey side extension and garage at 2 Verney Close (TP). 

                                    No Objection

 

284/04            PLANNING APPEALS 

4/0258/04/FUL          Construction of three-storey building comprising five flats with parking at 1 Park View Road. 

4/0653/04                  Single storey rear extension and alterations at Ambleside, Sugar Lane, Bourne End. 

4/1068/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension at 11 Coram Close. 

4/1975/04/ENA         Land R/O Shepherds Close, Byways. 

4/1976/04/ENA         Land R/O Downlands (Fairlawn), Byways.

4/1977/04/ENA         Land R/O Tudor Lodge, Byways. 

4/1978/04/ENA         Land adj. Linden Court, Byways. 

The planning appeals circulated with the agenda were noted.  No additional comments were necessary.

 

285/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

                        The Planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

286/04            CLOSE OF MEETING                                   

                        The meeting closed at 8.47 p.m.

 

9.         Planning Decisions

 

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Tuesday 31st August 2004 at 7.30 p.m.

 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby - Chairman

                                    Geraldine Corry

                                    J. Critcher

                                    Mrs. H. McCloskey

                                    G. Stevens

                       

SUBSTITUTE MEMBER: 

Councillor                   Betty Patterson

           

OFFICER:                

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk

266/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE  

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Lythgoe.

 

267/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

Councillor Stevens declared an interest in application 4/1848/04/FUL as he was a friend of the applicant.

 

268/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 2nd August 2004 were agreed and signed by the Chairman.

 

269/04            MATTERS ARISING 

                        Vide Item 239/04 – Enforcement

                        The following matters were still outstanding:

 

a.                  Lloyds Bank – removal of collar round cash point.

E/O3.450

No progress.

 

b.                  Magoos – unauthorised external sign.

E/04/129

No progress.

c.                  Brookes Restaurant – unauthorised sign.

E/04/130

No progress.

d.                  Crystal Palace Public House – unauthorised decking in car park.

Refused on 25th March 2004 and has not been appealed.

e.                  79 High Street – unauthorised shuttering.

Refused on 31st March 2004 and has not been appealed.

f.                    Blockbusters, 283 High street – blue shuttering.

g.                  Repositioning of advertisement board on Listed Building at 103-109 High Street.

 

A large internally illuminated green box has been constructed between Shakti News, Charles Street, for the storage of newspapers.  The Chairman said that this may need advertisement consent as it advertises an on-line casino site.

Action Town Clerk

                       

270/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

                        There were no Chairman’s communications.

 

271/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 

There were a number of members of the public present in respect of various applications on the agenda.

 

272/04            ANNUAL PLANNING SEMINAR 

It was agreed that Councillors who were interested in attending the annual planning seminar would forward their available dates from mid to end October for a 7.30 p.m. meeting to the Clerk.

Action ALL Councillors

 

273/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS  

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED 

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity.

 

4/1555/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS & DESCRIPTION - Two storey side extension, single storey rear extension, two storey front extension, rear dormer windows (AMENDED SCHEME) and terracing to rear garden at 29 South Park Gardens.  (YE) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1780/04/FHA         Two storey rear and side extension at 19A Meadway (FB). 

Object due to the visual appearance of the proposed extension by its scale and height, and also that the extensions impair the architectural symmetry and integrity of the original house. 

 

4/1786/04/FUL          Single storey side and rear extensions at Goat Inn, 83 High Street (BL). 

                                    No objection subject to suitable soundproofing being installed to protect the adjacent attached property.

 

4/1800/04/ADV         Fascia sign and externally illuminated hanging sign at the Curry Garden, 29 High Street.  (TP) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1801/04/LBC         Internal redecoration repairs to gable end.  Redecoration of front elevation and signage at the Curry Garden, 29 High Street.  (TP) 

                                    Mrs. Susan Johnson was present to object to this application which she said was retrospective and the work carried out had changed the appearance and internal ambiance of this listed building which now looked nothing like the Black Horse Public House which preceded it.  She urged the Town Council to condemn the practice of retrospective applications in these circumstances, which was on the increase. 

                                    No objection to the external works already carried out.   

As no plans have been submitted to show the proposed works to the interior the Committee objects to those works as historic fabric may have been irretrievably and unnecessarily destroyed.

 

4/1807/04/FHA         Single storey front extension at 25 Hill View.  (RH) 

                                    No 0bjection

 

4/1813/04/TPO         Fell Sycamore at Orchard House, 1A Barncroft Road.  (RB) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1820/04/FHA         One and a half storey side and rear extension and single storey rear extension at 17 Chaucer Close.  (BC) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1825/04/FUL          New building incorporating design and technology, and art departments, dining centre and kitchen.  Remodelling of garden and replacement footbridge at Berkhamsted Collegiate School, Castle Street.  (YE) 

                                    A number of local residents were present to object to this application.  A spokesperson on behalf of CARAB and the Castle Street residents urged the Town Council to reject the application, which was inappropriate in the Conservation Area.  The roof was dominating and oppressive and the windows and frontage had an industrial look.  There would be increased traffic flow from Castle Street to Mill Street and noise pollution from increased functions at the school.  There would be an adverse impact on the homes of local people including loss of light. 

                                    Mrs. Susan Johnson on behalf of Berkhamsted Citizens Association said they were not opposed in principal to the development and recognised the need of the school to expand.  They also did not object to the demolition of some of the existing buildings, however, the plans produced were an inappropriate design in the Conservation Area and they particularly objected to the repetitive gables, fenestration and the vents, which looked like a forest of aerials. 

                                    A representative of the Chiltern Society read a letter of objection and said that the proposals would dominate the street-scene, were out of sympathy with existing housing and the visible chimneys were out of keeping with the Conservation Area.  New street elevations and window designs were needed to fit in with the area. 

Object because of the impact the proposals have on Castle Street, Mill Street and The Moor by their visual appearance, the adverse impact on the Conservation Area and the listed Grade II building opposite.  The cowls at over 3m dominate the roof profile that will clearly be seen from a distance.  The scattered obscure fenestration damages the historic Castle Street street-scene and the visual appearance from The Moor.  The building is hard up against the garage beside 44 Castle Street preventing maintenance to either building.  Concerns were also expressed with the design of the river alterations and that the proposals would dominate the river and reduce it to a ditch.  Members expressed a desire to see the report from the Environment Agency.

 

4/1826/04/CAC         Demolition of workshop, store, offices, classrooms, bridge and brick building at Berkhamsted Collegiate School, Castle Street.  (YE) 

                                    Object until there is an acceptable plan for any redevelopment as laid out in paragraph 4.27 of PPG5.

 

4/1838/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY – Works to trees at 26 Kings Road.  (RB) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1844/04/FHA         Detached double garage 19A Meadway (TP). 

                                    Object due to its size and height and the adverse impact the proposal will have on the visual appearance and semi-rural nature of the neighbourhood.

 

4/1848/04/FUL          Detached dwelling, garage and vehicle access on land at Littlehurst, Gravel Path (SS). 

                                    No objection

 

4/1848/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – Detached dwelling, garage and vehicle access at land at Littlehurst, Gravel Path.  (SS) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1849/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension and single storey rear extension at 28 Bridgewater Road (NG). 

                                    No objection

 

4/1850/04/FHA         Front dormer, velux and rear conservatory at 23 Queens Road (YE). 

Object as none of the houses on this side of Queens Road have either a front dormer or roof light.  To introduce one would interrupt an existing continuity of roofscape.  The dormer is also too large, being out of proportion and does not relate to the windows below.

 

4/1853/04/ADV         Replacement signage at Hall Park Service Station, London Road (TP). 

                                    Object to illuminated signs 03 and 11 which will produce unacceptable levels of light pollution to local residents.

 

4/1855/04/FHA         Single storey front extensions at 53 Egerton Road (BL). 

                                    No objection

 

4/1856/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY – Works to trees at 1, Greenway. (RB). 

                                    No objection

 

4/1860/04/FHA         Single storey front extension at 56 Valley Road (TP). 

                                    No objection

 

4/1861/04/FHA         First floor rear extension at 18A & 20 Dellfield Avenue (BC). 

                                    No objection

 

4/1889/04/DRC         Details of obscure glazing required by condition 20 of planning permission 4/1112/03 (Construction of two three storey blocks of 35 apartments with guest suite, communal lounges, laundry facilities and parking with new access off Cross Oak Road and access off London Road) at Garage, 343-351 High Street.  (NG)                                   

No objection

 

4/1896/04/FHA         Extension to caretakers house and demolition of existing wing at 25 Mill Street.  (YE) 

                                    Object as the distance between the two properties at half a metre is less than the recommended distance between properties.

 

4/1912/04/FHA         Replacement front wall and installation of railings and gate at 12 Boxwell Road.  (RB) 

                                    No objection in principle to the replacement wall and railings subject to the new railings being of a similar height to the neighbours and of a suitable design for the street scene and Conservation Area.

4/1919/04/FHA         Conservatory at 35 Oakwood.  (RB) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1937/04/TPO         Works to tree at 37 Oakwood.  (RB) 

                                    No objection subject to the views of the Tree Officer.

 

4/1938/04/FUL          Alterations and extensions to allow conversion into seven apartments and construction of eight apartments over car parking with glazed link to Mill at Castle Mill, Lower Kings Road.  (PN) 

                                    A local resident was present to object to this application, which he said was too tall and out of keeping with neighbouring properties.  The proposals would lead to the building being too dominant and would impair the whole environment. 

                                    Object due to the adverse impact of the visual appearance, design and bulk on both the Town and Canal-scape.  The extension is obtrusive and should not dominate the appearance of the original Mill.  The Committee consider that any conversion, including the plant room, should be sympathetic to the existing architectural features and be no higher than the existing building.

 

4/1940/04/FHA         Alterations and single storey extension at Keepers, Chesham Road.  (YE) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1942/04/FHA         First floor side extension at 9 Bridgewater Road.  (BC) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1951/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension and double garage at 99 Bridgewater Road.  (BC) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1953/04/FUL          Autotransformer at land at Thames Water Sewage Works, Bullbeggars Lane.  (JA) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1962/04/LDP         Loft conversion at 26 Shrublands Road.  (JA) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1970/04/FHA         Two-storeys and single-storey extension at 43 Meadow Road.  (TP) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1974/04/RET          Two-storey rear and side extensions and single storey rear extension (AMENDED SCHEME) at 20 Hall Park Gate.  (YE) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1974/04/RET          AMENDED PLANS - Two-storey rear and side extensions and single storey rear extension (AMENDED SCHEME) at 20 Hall Park Gate.  (YE) 

                                    No objection

 

4/1993/04/RET          Patios and privacy screens at various plots at The Mansion, Berkhamsted Hill.  (JC)

                                    (Reduction in area)

                                    A number of residents of Castle Village were present.  Their spokesperson, Cyril Collins, explained the history of problems associated with the builder and urged the Committee to reject application 4/1993/04/RET which would require work carried out by the residents to be dismantled but to accept 4/1994/04/RET which he said would enable the current situation to be retained. 

                                    Object on grounds of a need to maintain the privacy of the residents.

 

4/1994/04/RET          Patios and privacy screens at various plots at The Mansion, Berkhamsted Hill.  (JC)

                                    (Retention of extra patio areas and privacy screens).

                                    A number of residents of Castle Village were present.  Their spokesperson, Cyril Collins, explained the history of problems associated with the builder and urged the Committee to reject application 4/1993/04/RET which would require work carried out by the residents to be dismantled but to accept 4/1994/04/RET which he said would enable the current situation to be retained. 

                                    No objection

 

4/1998/04/FHA         First floor rear extension at 22 Woodlands Avenue.  (EP) 

                                    The occupant of no. 20 Woodlands Avenue was present to object to the application which she said was too big and would mean that the site was over-developed.  She would have a wall only one foot from her boundary which would cause loss of natural light and loss of sunlight in the afternoon.  She was concerned that damage could be caused to her property by drainage and ventilation and that she may suffer damp from the shower on her party wall. 

Object as the proposed extension by virtue of its relative height and positioning, would have an overbearing impact on the neighbouring property, and would result in loss of sunlight, contrary to Policy 11 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991-2011.  The relocation of the proposed ensuite bathroom on the first floor is hard up against the bedroom of the party wall of N°20 resulting in an unacceptable level of disturbance caused by use.

 

4/1999/04/FHA         Single storey and two storey side extensions (AMENDED SCHEME) at 19 Hall Park.  (EP) 

                                    No objection

 

4/2003/04/FUL          Two-storey rear extension at 4 Castle Hill Avenue.  (FB) 

                                    No objection

 

4/2004/04/FHA         Demolition of garage and construction of double garage/garden and log store at Fairhill Cottage, The Common.  (JA) 

                                    No objection

 

4/2010/04/FUL          Change of use from Residential to Ultrasound Examination Service (Class D1) at 12 Cowper Road (FB). 

                                    Object as the change of use to a business premises in the heart of a residential area is inappropriate as there is already a lack of available car parking space.  It would also create a general level of disturbance by its change of use.

 

4/2011/04/TPO         Removal and works to trees at Pilgrims, Shenstone Hill, Gravel Path (RB) 

                                    No objection to T2 as the tree is dead and no objection to T1 subject to the views of the Tree Officer.

 

4/2013/04/FUL          Construction of detached house, access and parking space adj. Highsteps, George Street (SS). 

                                    No objection

 

274/04                        PLANNING APPEALS 

4/847/04/CAC           Demolition of dwelling

4/848/04/FUL            Replacement of 77 High Street with 2 one-bed flats and development to the rear of a two-storey terrace of 14 one-bed flats with associated parking and access.   

                                    The appeal was noted.  No further comment was necessary.    

 

4/933/04/FHA            Proposed Garage, rear extension and loft conversion at 26 Chaucer Close.  

                                    The appeal was noted.  No further comment was necessary.      

 

4/1500/04/ENA         Bed & Breakfast 4, Elm Grove.

                                    The appeal was noted.  No further comment was necessary.    

 

4/1176/04/FUL          Replacement of 77 High Street with one bed flats and

4/1177/04/CAC         development to the rear of a 2-storey terrace of 14 one-bed flats with associated parking and access (duplicate application). 

                                    The appeal was noted.  No further comment was necessary.    

 

275/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

                        The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

276/04            CLOSE OF MEETING

 

                        The meeting closed at 9.11 p.m.

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Monday 2nd August 2004 at 7.30 p.m. 

 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 Geraldine Corry – Vice-Chairman

                                    J. Critcher

                                    J. Lythgoe

                                    Mrs. H. McCloskey

                                    G. Stevens                                   

OFFICER:                  

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk 

 

 

257/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE  

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Talbot-Ponsonby. 

258/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA            

There were no declarations of interest regarding items on the agenda. 

259/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 12th July 2004 were agreed and signed by the Vice-Chairman. 

260/04            MATTERS ARISING  

                        Vide Item 252/04 – Urban Capacity Studies

Councillor Stevens confirmed that a letter had been sent and asked for the methodology subsequently received to be copied to him and the Vice-Chairman.

                        Action Town Clerk

 

                        Vide Item 253/04 – Planning application for Skateboard Park

Councillor Stevens said that the Youth Town Council had used a recent Saturday market to consult on the location of the park.  The outcome was as yet unknown.

 

261/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS  

The Town Clerk said that following an exchange of communication between him and David Noble at Dacorum Borough Council it had been agreed that the response to planning applications should be to either Object with material reasons or No objection. 

The Dacorum Borough Council Local Plan 1991-2011 Final Version had been received and was available for reference.

 

262/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION  

There were six members of the public present who were given the opportunity to speak when plans they were interested in were dealt with.

 

263/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS  

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED 

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity.

 

4/1176/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – Replacement of 77 High Street with 2 one-bed flats and development to the rear of a 2-storey terrace of 14 one-bed flats with associated parking and access (duplicate application).                                   

Object due to the unsafe nature of the access to and from the site, loss of privacy and amenity to residents in Victoria Road and Highfield Road by overlooking and potential pollution to those residents by light. 

                                    Object to the proposed reduction to one flat by the raising of the arch as it considerably spoils the appearance of the street scene with an out of balance elevation with the properties on either side. 

                                    The relocation of the summerhouse is not materially affected by the above recommendations. 

                                    It is strongly recommended that a site visit takes place to include Ward Councillors of the Town Council, representatives of Hertfordshire Highways, the Planning Officer and a representative of the developer, which should take place at a peak traffic time in order to fully appreciate the dangerous nature of the access/egress. 

                                   

4/1369/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS – Single storey rear and two storey side extensions and extension to retaining wall with footpath at 102 Bridgewater Road.  (YE) 

No objection, subject to the prominent overhanging eaves being maintained to match those of their neighbour and to ensure continuity with all the similar houses on that side of Bridgewater Road.

 

4/1545/04/ADV         AMENDED PLANS – Fascia and projecting sign at 227-229 High Street.  (TP) 

No objection to the projecting sign, as it is non-illuminated.

                                                                        No objection to the fascia sign.

 

4/1617/04/FHA         First floor extension over garage at 4 Beechcroft, Chesham Road.  (AP) 

Object, as the proposed extension, by virtue of its relative height and positioning would have an overbearing impact on the neighbouring property and is therefore contrary to Policy 11 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991-2011.

 

4/1623/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at 31 Kings Road.  (RB) 

                                    No Objection, subject to the views of the Tree Officer.

 

4/1632/04/FUL          Construction of three storey dwelling with integral garage at land adj. Alton, 36 Kitsbury Road.  (AP) 

                                   No objection.

Members would suggest that conditions be imposed restricting construction vehicles from using the drive to Tamarisk and Bayridge for turning as the drains are close to the surface and damage could be caused by heavy vehicles going over them.  Any further damage caused to the garden bank of Bayridge during the construction of the house to be reinstated to its former 2002 condition.

 

4/1636/04/FUL         Change of use of first and second floor and out building from commercial to domestic use.  Extension and alterations at ground level and basement at 224 High Street.  (AP) 

Object as the proposed refurbishment will destroy much of the historic features, referred to in the 22nd amendment, dated 9th May 2003, of Buildings of Special Architectural or Historic Interest, for which the primary interest is the ground floor shop. There is also no indication as to whether the remaining historic features would remain. 

There is no objection to the conversion of the first and second floors back to a house subject to the entrance being from the rear as any alteration would destroy historic features mentioned in the listing description, and break up the front façade of what is a continuous shop front and fascia. 

If the refurbishment were to be allowed, precaution should be taken to secure and protect the internal features against loss or damage during the refurbishment work to those features not being moved.  It is requested that the Conservation Officer should visit the site and assess the application.

 

4/1639/04/LBC         Change of use of first and second floors from commercial to residential and of outbuildings from commercial/residential to wholly residential and rear/side extension to ground floor and basement at 224 High Street.  (AP) 

Object as the proposed refurbishment will destroy much of the historic features, referred to in the 22nd amendment, dated 9th May 2003, of Buildings of Special Architectural or Historic Interest, for which the primary interest is the ground floor shop. There is also no indication as to whether the remaining historic features would remain. 

There is no objection to the conversion of the first and second floors back to a house subject to the entrance being from the rear as any alteration would destroy historic features mentioned in the listing description, and break up the front façade of what is a continuous shop front and fascia. 

If the refurbishment were to be allowed, precaution should be taken to secure and protect the internal features against loss or damage during the refurbishment work to those features not being moved.  It is requested that the Conservation Officer should visit the site and assess the application.

 

4/1640/04/FHA         Side conservatory at 17 Gaveston Drive.  (FB) 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1662/04/FUL          Change of use of first and second floors from office to residential and replacement windows at 283 High Street.  (FB) 

The next-door neighbour was present to object to the application, which he said would cause an increase in noise to his property, as his living accommodation was adjacent to the new development.  There would also be an increase in traffic, which would hinder the use of his parking space. 

No objection, subject to all fenestration being of wood, which is more appropriate for the Conservation Area.

 

4/1663/04/FUL          Provision of disabled parking space with external light, external signage and new entrance door at 199 High Street.  (YE) 

No objections, subject to the external signage being non-illuminated as illumination is against the policy of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan for signs in the Conservation Area.

 

4/1673/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension at 42 Swing Gate Lane.  (RH) 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1676/04/FHA         Two-storey side and single storey rear extensions at Harriotts End Farm, Haresfoot Park, Chesham Road.  (AP) 

Object, as the application site is within the Metropolitan Green Belt, and that the extension contravenes by its excessive size the Borough Local Plan and the national policy as set out in PPG2

 

4/1683/04/FHA         Garage conversion, front porch and alteration to fenestration at Willow House, Shootersway.  (PN) 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1700/04/TPO         Fell tree at 4 Marlin Copse.  (RH) 

No objection to the felling of the Oak provided that the Tree Officer supports that course of action.

 

4/1702/04/FHA         Garage extension and conversion at 10 Barncroft Road.  (EP) 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1703/04/ROC         Variation of condition 2 of planning permission 4/2447/03 (alterations to windows and doors on rear elevation and replacement roof to rear extension) to allow plain sash windows without intermediate glazing bars at Alton, 36 Kitsbury Road.  (AP) 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1720/04/FUL          Construction of detached house, access and parking space adj. Highsteps, George Street.  (SS) 

Mr. E. Dyer said that it was regrettable that a number of mature Ash trees had been felled from the site.  It was a strange site for a new house, as it would be facing a steep bank.  A cross-section of the site would have been useful to show the alignment of the house with the bank. 

Object as it is over development of the site and that it is in front of the building line and that its design is unsympathetic to the adjoining houses to the left.

 

4/1728/04/TPO         Works to trees at 2 & 3 Beechcroft, Chesham Road. (RH) 

                                    No Objection, subject to the supervision of the Tree Officer.

 

4/1732/04/LDE         Use as Offices at Tower House, (R/O 222), High Street. (AP). 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1741/04/TPO         Fell two trees at 3 The Hemmings (RB). 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1751/04/FHA         Single storey side and rear extension at 14 Bridgewater Road (RB). 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1753/04/FUL          Change of Use from Café (Class A3) to Cafeteria with part retail, part pottery making (Classes A1, A3 & B1) at 6B Northbridge Road (TP). 

                                    No Objection.

 

4/1755/04/FHA         Room in roof with rear dormer at 18 Orchard Avenue (TP). 

                                    Object as the dormer is too big and out of scale with the rest of the property.

 

4/1766/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY – Works to trees, Fells House, Prince Edward Street (RH). 

                                    No objection subject to the views of the Tree Officer.

 

4/1772/04/FHA         Two-storey side and rear extension and internal alterations, Byways House, Byways, Gravel Path (SS). 

                                    No Objection.

 

264/04            PLANNING DECISIONS  

The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

265/04            CLOSE OF MEETING  

                        The meeting closed at 8.44 p.m.

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Tuesday 12th July 2004 at 7.30 p.m. 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby

                                    Geraldine Corry

                                    J. Critcher (arrived 7.40 p.m.)

                                    Mrs. H. McCloskey

                                    G. Stevens                       

NON-COMMITTEE MEMBER: 

Councillor                   Victor Earl

           

OFFICER: 

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk 

 

245/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE  

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Lythgoe. 

246/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

All the members present declared a personal interest in 4/1498/04 Skateboard Park at Velvet Lawn.

 

247/04            MINUTES 

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 21st June 2004 were agreed and signed by the Chairman.

 

248/04            MATTERS ARISING 

                        There were no matters arising.

 

249/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

A letter had been received from Robertson Associates concerning planning application 4/0764/04 at 339 & 339A High Street pointing out that the proposed new construction was contained within the demise land belonging to 339.

A letter had been received from Berkhamsted Collegiate School advising of a planning application to be made shortly to construct a new Design Centre at Castle Campus.  The plans would be on display in Old Hall, Castle Street, from the 19th July to 6th August 2004.

 

250/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 

There were 20 members of the public present in respect of various planning applications.

 

251/04            LANDMARK BUILDINGS 

The Chairman referred to correspondence circulated with the agenda.  Following discussion it was agreed that the shop premises at 173 High Street (formerly Figgs Pharmacy) should be proposed as a potential landmark building.  It was agreed that Councillors Talbot-Ponsonby and Stevens would compile a short statement of up to 100 words on why the building had been chosen.  It was also noted that a photograph was required and that the submission date was by 30th September 2004.

                        Action Councillors Talbot-Ponsonby and Stevens

 

252/04            URBAN CAPACITY STUDIES 

The Chairman referred to the correspondence circulated with the agenda.  Following discussion it was agreed that the Town Council should comment on the information supplied particularly with regard to the effect of new housing development on the infrastructure of the Town.  Councillor Stevens agreed to compile a suitable response by Friday 16th July 2004.

                        Action Councillor Stevens

 

253/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS 

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED 

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity. 

 

4/0156/03/FUL          ADDITIONAL PLANS - Single dwelling adj. 22 Beech Hill Court.  (NG)                                   

                                    There were a number of residents of Beech Hill Court were present to object to this application on grounds of over-development of the site, the fact that the original development was an integral set of buildings and the proposed addition would adversely affect the original development.  Also that the egress onto Gravel Path was dangerous and there was an issue of ownership of the land in respect of which the management company had not been consulted and would not give their consent to any request for permission of use. 

Object on the following grounds: 

a.                  Over-development of the site.

b.                 The original estate was conceived as an integral set of buildings and any addition would not be in keeping with the original concept.

c.                  Any proposed building would increase the poor visibility on egressing the site by vehicles and pedestrians, as there is no pavement on that side of Gravel Path.

d.                 A scaled down version of the style of houses on the estate would have a damaging impact on its appearance.

 

4/0764/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – Two storey rear extension to commercial premises and second floor rear extension to maisonette at 339 & 339A High Street.  (NG) 

It was noted that this application had been withdrawn.

 

4/0979/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS – Temporary relocation of buildings for a period of two years at land adj. Adelbert House, Berkhamsted Collegiate School, Mill Street.  (RF) 

A representative of Berkley Court was present to object to the application, which constituted a change of use from a garden to a repair workshop.  There would be noise from electrical saws all day long and he had noted that the staff using the equipment were required to wear ear protectors.  The noise would adversely affect the quality of life of the residents. 

Support as the temporary hut will be well screened and further away from windows on Berkley Court, but subject to conditions stipulating hours of use being imposed to minimise disturbance to nearby residents.  Appropriate soundproofing measures should be installed and screening should be erected around the vacated site.

 

4/1176/04/FUL          AMENDED PLANS - Replacement of 77 High Street with 2 one-bed flats and development to the rear of a 2-storey terrace of 14 one-bed flats with associated parking and access (duplicate application) at 77 High Street.  (JC) 

There were a number of local residents present to object to this application and the Chairman sought their agreement to dealing with the additional information and plans, which had been received on the 9th July 2004.  The spokesperson for the residents objected to the application on grounds of the dangerous nature of the access/egress to the High Street, over-development of a long narrow site and over-looking of residents in Victoria and Highfield Road.  The spokesperson asked when the Highways Agency had visited and whether or not Councillors were present and also asked why the summerhouse had to be moved. 

                                    Object due to the unsafe nature of the access to and from the site, loss of privacy and amenity to residents in Victoria Road and Highfield Road by overlooking and potential pollution to those residents by light. 

                                    Object to the proposed reduction to one flat by the raising of the arch as it considerably spoils the appearance of the street scene with an out of balance elevation with the properties on either side. 

                                    It is strongly recommended that a site visit takes place to include representatives of Hertfordshire Highways and especially at peak traffic times in order to fully appreciate the dangerous nature of the access/egress.   

                                    It was noted that there was no information available from Hertfordshire Highways concerning the traffic implications of the application. 

The relocation of the summerhouse is not materially affected by the above recommendations. 

 

4/1176/04/FUL          ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND ADDITIONAL PLANS – Replacement of 77 High Street with 2 one-bed flats and development to the rear of a 2-storey terrace of 14 one-bed flats with associated parking and access (DUPLICATE APPLICATION) for 77 High Street.  (JC) 

There were a number of local residents present to object to this application and the Chairman sought their agreement to dealing with the additional information and plans, which had been received on the 9th July 2004.  The spokesperson for the residents objected to the application on grounds of the dangerous nature of the access/egress to the High Street, over-development of a long narrow site and over-looking of residents in Victoria and Highfield Road.  The spokesperson asked when the Highways Agency had visited and whether or not Councillors were present and also asked why the summerhouse had to be moved. 

                                    Object due to the unsafe nature of the access to and from the site, loss of privacy and amenity to residents in Victoria and Highfield Road by overlooking despite the removal of the balconies, and potential pollution to those residents by light. 

                                    Object to the proposed reduction to one flat by the raising of the arch as it considerably spoils the appearance of the street scene with an out of balance elevation with the properties on either side. 

                                    It is strongly recommended that a site visit takes place to include representatives of Hertfordshire Highways and especially at peak traffic times in order to fully appreciate the dangerous nature of the access/egress.   

                                    It was noted that there was no information available from Hertfordshire Highways concerning the traffic implications of the application. 

The relocation of the summerhouse is not materially affected by the above recommendations.

 

4/1287/04/FHA         ADDITIONAL PLANS – Conservatory and terracing at Lennox, 15 Kingsdale Road.  (YE) 

Support as the additional plans show that the conservatory and patio area compliments the house.

 

4/1299/04/OUT         AMENDED PLANS – Demolition of garage and construction of dwelling land r/o 1 Ash Mount Cottages, Swing Gate Lane and r/o 2 & 4 Woodlands Avenue.  (BL) 

                                    Oppose as the reduction in the rear gardens of 1 Ash Mount Cottages and 2 and 4 Woodlands Avenue would leave them with an unacceptable amount of amenity space that would pertain for the life of the house and not just for the applicants.  The supposed position of the proposed dwelling is in front of the building line of Swing Gate Lane and barely a metre from no. 28.

 

4/1399/04/FHA         Single storey side extension at 15 Shrublands Road.  (RF) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to object and that the proposed dormer window matches that of the house.

 

4/1399/04/FHA         AMENDED DESCRIPTION - Single storey side extension and detached double garage at 15 Shrublands Road.  (RF) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to object and that the proposed dormer window matches that of the house.

 

4/1419/04/FUL          Detached house, carport and garage at 1 Billet Lane.  (JA) 

                                    Object due to over-development of the site and the potential traffic problems, which might be caused by access onto an already busy road, also on the adverse impact of the visual appearance of the proposed house by reason of its height and design in that a town house is out of character in the area.

 

4/1428/04/FHA         Single Storey side extension, porch infill and new driveway at 129 Cross Oak Road.  (BC) 

                                    Support as the variation to the approved scheme is attractive and blends in well with the rest of the house.

 

4/1435/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension at Westmount, Byways, Gravel Path.  (BC) 

                                    Support as the proposed extension matches that of the existing breakfast room.   

                                    Please note that this house is in Gravel Path and not Byways

 

4/1442/04/RET          Boundary fence and rear conservatory at 12 Admiral Way.  (BC) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to object in that the fence fits in well with the street scene.

 

4/1460/04/FHA         Loft conversion with two rear dormer windows and rooflights (RE-SUBMISSION) at 130 Bridgewater Road.  (BL)

                                    The applicant was present to speak in support of the application. 

                                    Support the loft conversion with two rear dormer windows and the front and side velux as they do not detract from the street scene.

 

4/1466/04/FHA         Rooflights – front and rear elevations at 7 Dellfield Close.  (RB) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to object.

 

4/1477/04/LBC         Internal redecoration and alteration.  Repair to external wall and re-decoration of front elevation at the Curry Garden, 29 High Street.  (TP) 

                                    Support as the external works already carried out improve the appearance of this early C19th building.  As no plans have been submitted to show the existing layout we may be unable to support the internal works as historic fabric maybe irretrievably and unnecessarily destroyed.

 

4/1480/04/LDE         Change of use of workshop used for business purposes to residential building at Bridgewater Boats Ltd., Bridge Street.  (RE) 

                                    Object as the existing residential accommodation is very cramped with poor access and no private amenity space.  The application is therefore contrary to policies 9, 10 and 20 (in relation to conversions) of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan 1991-2011 (Deposit Draft). 

 

4/1483/04/FHA         Conservatory at 19 Greene Walk.  (RB) 

                                    Support as the proposed conservatory will be built with a shared party wall with no. 20. 

 

4/1484/04/FHA         Conservatory at 20 Greene Walk.  (RB) 

                                    Support as the proposed conservatory will be built with a shared party wall with no. 19 and fills an otherwise unusable void.

 

4/1491/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension at 7 Cobb Road.  (NG) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to object and that there would be no loss of privacy or light to their neighbours.

 

4/1498/04/FUL          Skateboard Park at Velvet Lawn recreation ground, Swing Gate Lane.  (NG) 

                                    Mr. N. Cutting said that the proposed site of the Skateboard Park was within 10 metres of a hedge and two trees.  It was also less than 100 metres from the nearest dwelling.  If the plan was correct it would intrude on the football pitch.  There was mention of a footpath in the application which was not shown on the drawing.  Contrary to statements made in the application the Park would not be seen easily from Swing Gate Lane as the view was obstructed by trees.  There were no toilet facilities on the site.  There was no information on the proposed catchment area.  The site was too far from the Town centre and would not attract skateboarders from a very wide area.  If it was constructed on Velvet Lawn it should be moved closer to the existing playground and should be subject to a four-year temporary permission.  The management group should be set up before it begins operating and CCTV should be installed before use. 

                                    There were two members of the Berkhamsted Youth Town Council present who objected to the proposed location of the skateboard park.  They said it was too far from the centre of the Town and other locations such as Canal Fields should be considered.  They were concerned that Velvet Lawn would not be a safe area for users and were confident that a more suitable location could be found. 

                                    A local resident said that skateboard parks had not been found to be acceptable in other towns when they were close to residential areas. 

                                    On behalf of the Town Council Committee members made no comment on this application but requested that the comments made by members of the public at the meeting be forwarded to Dacorum Borough Council.

 

4/1499/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension at 11 Millfield.  (FB) 

                                    Support as the proposed extension maintains the same footprint and is in keeping with the house and adjoining properties.

 

4/1516/04/FHA         Conservatory at 128 George Street.  (BC) 

                                    Support as the proposed conservatory maintains the same footprint and is less obtrusive than the present structures.

 

4/1520/04/FHA         Alterations to second floor balcony at 11 Lady Cooper Court, Benningfield Gardens.  (RB) 

                                    Support as the balcony would match those already on Lady Cooper and Ravens Courts and that it would not affect the setting of the Listed Building.

 

4/1524/04/FHA         Single storey front and two storey rear extension at 57 Kings Road.  (YE) 

                                    The applicant was present to speak in favour of his application and said that the plans had been revised following comments from the neighbours and advice from the Planning Officer. 

                                    Support the front extension, as there are no grounds on which to object.   

                                    Object to the rear extension, which by its size would cause loss of light onto a principle ground floor room of no. 59 not shown on the plan.  The blank wall is overbearing and therefore may result in loss of amenity and sunlight. 

 

4/1527/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension (AMENDED SCHEME) at 100 Kings Road.  (BL) 

                                    A local resident was present to object to the application, which would cause overlooking to the rear of no. 2 Kings Road.  There was also potential problem with cars having to reverse which maybe dangerous. 

                                    Support the two-storey side extension, as there are no grounds on which to object. 

                                    Object to the design of the parking area outside the house as there is insufficient space for turning with other cars parked resulting in cars reversing up the private drive of 104 and 106. 

                                    Object to the left hand rear balcony, as this would cause loss of privacy by overlooking the garden of 102.

 

4/1545/04/ADV         Fascia and projecting sign at 227-229 High Street.  (TP) 

                                    Object to the internally illuminated projecting sign, as they are inappropriate in a Conservation Area and contrary to the policies of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.

                                    Support the fascia sign if it is either externally illuminated or unlit but object if internally illuminated as they are inappropriate in a Conservation Area contrary to the policies of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan.

 

4/1548/04/FUL          New shop front, installation of air conditioning units, erection of satellite dish and internal alterations at 227 – 229 High Street.  (BL) 

                                    Support all the new proposed works, with the exception of the satellite dish, but suggest that the panels on the right hand shop front be reduced to three to match those on the left.  This would improve the appearance of the street scene.  The luminosity of the display panels should be of low intensity to maintain the appearance of the street scene and  Conservation Area. 

                                    No comment could be made on the proposal for the satellite dish, as its location was not shown on the plans.

 

4/1551/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to tree at 72 Cross Oak Road.  (RB) 

                                    Support as the cutting back of this cluster of Hazel shoots is desirable to improve the amenity value of the play area.

 

4/1552/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY – Works to tree at 80 Ellesmere Road.  (RB) 

                                    Support as if left the tree would cause structural damage to the garage.

 

4/1555/04/FHA         Two storey side extension, single storey rear extension, two storey front extension, rear dormer windows (AMENDED SCHEME) at 29 South Park Gardens.  (YE) 

                                    Support as the proposed front extension does not extend in front of the building line and the design is in keeping with other properties in the street.

 

4/1559/04/FHA         Rear dormer extension at 135 Bridgewater Road.  (BC) 

                                    Support as the design matches that of the other dormers in Bridgewater Road in design and proportion.

 

4/1572/04/LDP         Single storey rear extension and internal alterations at 20 Highfield Road.  (RB) 

Support as the extension stays within the rear building line.

 

4/1575/04/FUL          Installation of lighting columns and luminaries at Berkhamsted Health Centre, Victory Road.  (NG) 

                                    Support in principle as there are no grounds on which to object and their installation would improve public safety but subject to the lamps being positioned to improve security (not clearly located on the plans) without causing light pollution to residents.  The views of the Crime Prevention Officer should also be sought.

 

4/1595/04/FUL          Single storey library and link at Greenway First & Nursery School, Crossways.  (AP) 

                                    Support as the design makes full use of natural light within a confined space. 

 

254/04            PLANNING APPEAL 

4/1500/04/ENA         Bed and Breakfast at 4 Elm Grove.  

                        The correspondence circulated with the agenda was noted.

 

255/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

                        The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

256/04            CLOSE OF MEETING 

                        The meeting closed at 9.05 p.m.

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Tuesday 21st June 2004 at 7.30 p.m. 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby

                                    J.D. Lythgoe 

                                    Geraldine Corry

                                    J. Critcher (arrived 7.40 p.m.)

                                    Mrs. H. McCloskey                                   

OFFICER:                  

Mr. C.R. Westwood – Town Clerk 

 

235/04            APOLOGIES  

Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Stevens.

 

236/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

There were no declarations of interest regarding items on the agenda.

 

237/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 1st June 2004 were agreed and signed by the Chairman.

 

238/04            MATTERS ARISING 

                        There were no matters arising.

 

239/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

The Chairman referred to a number of items requiring enforcement.  Of those mentioned by him previously only one had been resolved at Ashlyns Hall.  The outstanding issues were: 

a.                  Lloyds Bank – removal of collar round cash point.

E/O3.450

b.                  Magoos – unauthorised external sign.

E/04/129

c.                  Brookes Restaurant – unauthorised sign.

E/04/130

d.                  Crystal Palace Public House – unauthorised decking in car park.

e.                  79 High Street – unauthorised shuttering. 

Following refusal of retrospective applications the following works have not ceased nor been removed. 

f.                    Bed & Breakfast at 4 Elm Grove.

g.                  Menu boxes on Café Rouge, 296-298 High Street. 

Other possible breaches at other locations. 

h.                  Blockbusters, 283 High street – blue shuttering.

i.                    Repositioning of advertisement board on Listed Building at 103-109 High Street. 

It was agreed that the matters above should be referred to the Enforcement Officers at Dacorum Borough Council.

                        Action Town Clerk

 

240/04            DACORUM BOROUGH LOCAL PLAN – THE NEXT STEPS 

The Chairman referred to the letter received from Dacorum Borough Council and said that the Committee would look forward to seeing the Local Development Framework and to working closely with the Borough Council to ensure that the framework was implemented in the light of the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Bill.

 

241/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 

                        There were three members of the public present.

 

242/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS 

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED 

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity.

                       

4/1231-04                  (Hertfordshire County Council application) Single storey classroom block at Bridgewater School, Bridle Way. (DT). 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1036/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS – Two-storey side extension at 9 West Road.  (FB) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1144/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS - Loft conversion at 36 Cross Oak Road.  (TP) 

Support the loft conversion but oppose the rear dormer, which by its size does not align with the windows below and should be no larger than them.

 

4/1187/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS – Single storey rear extension and single sloping parking bay at 11 Finch Road.  (JA) 

Support the concrete parking area as it maintains the appearance of the street scene.  Oppose the proposed rear extension and conversion of the garage, as it would increase the original ground floor living space by about 105%, which is out of keeping with adjoining houses, all of a similar design and size.

 

4/1237/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension at 15 Hill View.  (TP) 

Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose but members expressed their concern that the extension would be so highly prominent.

 

4/1278/04/LDP         Garage conversion at 19 Ashlyns Road.  (TP) 

                                    Support as this is permitted development.

 

4/1287/04/FHA         Conservatory at Lennox, 15 Kingsdale Road.  (YE) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1292/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Works to trees at 10 Chapel Street.  (RB) 

                                    Angela Wheeldon, the next door neighbour, was present and said that this was an overgrown Christmas tree and the applicant wanted to remove some branches.  She did not object to this proposal but would not support the tree being removed completely. 

                                    Support as it is clear that the tree has become too large for the garden.

 

4/1299/04/OUT         Demolition of garage and construction of dwelling at land r/o 1 Ash Mount Cottages, Swing Gate Lane and r/o 2 & 4 Woodlands Avenue.  (BL)                                   

Mr. E. Dyer said that there was evidence of recent work being carried out to the garage.  There was no detail in the application for the proposed building, which made a decision difficult.  The plot was on rising ground, which may cause overlooking. 

                                    Oppose as the reduction in the rear gardens of 1 Ash Mount Cottages and 2 and 4 Woodlands Avenue would leave them with an unacceptable amount of amenity space that would pertain for the life of the house and not just for the applicants.

 

4/1307/04/FUL          Demolish existing dwelling and construction of replacement dwelling at South Gables, 22 Meadway.  (FB) 

The applicant was present and spoke briefly in support of the application.                                   

                                    Support as the proposed house is more suited in design to what is currently there.

 

4/1327/04/TPO         Fell one tree at The Cedars, Ivy House Lane.  (RB) 

                                    Mr. E. Dyer said that there was only one Cedar tree left at The Cedars and if it had to be felled a replacement Cedar tree should be planted. 

                                    Oppose the felling of the tree unless the Tree Officer agrees that it is dangerous.  If it were felled it should be replaced with a mature Cedar tree.

 

4/1336/04/GOV         Proposed ATC building at land at Ashlyns School, Chesham Road.  (AP) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose and that its appearance would not adversely affect the nearby Listed Building.

 

4/1339/04/FHA         Conservatory at 25 Connaught Gardens.  (RB) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1342/04/TCA         FOR INFORMATION ONLY – Fell tree at Longmead, Kitsbury Terrace.  (RB) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1365/04/FHA         Alteration to second floor balcony at 19 Lady Cooper Court, Benningfield Gardens.  (RB) 

                                    Support as the balcony would match those already on Ravens Court and that it would not affect the setting of the Listed Building.

 

4/1369/04/FHA         Single storey rear and two storey side extensions at 102 Bridgewater Road.  (YE) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose subject to the prominent overhanging eaves being maintained to match that of their neighbour and to ensure continuity with all the similar houses on that side of Bridgewater Road.

 

4/1381/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension and alterations to front boundary wall and garage at Voelas, Doctors Commons Road.  (BC) 

Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose and that it would make a positive improvement to the street scene.

 

4/1394/04/LDP         Garage conversion at 44 Long View.  (RB) 

Support as there are no grounds on which to oppose and that there is adequate parking in front of the house.

 

243/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

                        The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

244/04            CLOSE OF MEETING

 

                        The meeting closed at 7.57 p.m. 

 

 

Reports and Minutes of the Meeting of

TOWN PLANNING COMMITTEE

Held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Berkhamsted on

Tuesday 1st June 2004 at 7.30 p.m.

 

 

MEMBERS PRESENT: 

Councillors                 C. Talbot-Ponsonby

                                    J.D. Lythgoe 

                                    Geraldine Corry

                                    J. Critcher

                                    Mrs. H. McCloskey

                                    G. Stevens

 

OFFICER:                  

Mr. G. Barnes

 

224/04            TO ELECT A CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN FOR THE FORTHCOMING YEAR 

Councillor Talbot-Ponsonby was elected as Chairman for the forthcoming year and Councillor Geraldine Corry as Vice-Chairman.

 

225/04            APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 

There were no apologies for absence.

 

226/04            TO RECEIVE DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST REGARDING ITEMS ON THE AGENDA 

There were no relevant declarations of interest regarding items on the agenda.

 

227/04            MINUTES  

            The minutes of the previous meeting held on the 11th May 2004 had been agreed at Full Council and were signed by the Chairman. 

 

228/04            MATTERS ARISING 

                        Vide Item 218/04 – Commemorative plaque at the Rex Cinema

It was noted that the Town Clerk had written to Nicholas King Homes who had replied to the effect that a personnel change had delayed installation but it was now proceeding.  The Town Clerk had asked that the Town Council be kept informed of progress.

 

229/04            CHAIRMAN’S COMMUNICATIONS 

A copy of a letter sent to David Noble, Dacorum Borough Council, by Councillor Fantham, Chairman of Northchurch Parish Council had been received asking why a planning application for a bus shelter at the junction of Darrs Lane and the A4251 had been referred to Berkhamsted Town Council, for information.  

Notice had been received from Dacorum Borough Council of the adoption of the Borough Local Plan 1991-2011 on 21st April 2004.  Copies were available from 12th May 2004 at the Civic Centre, Berkhamsted.  

A letter had been received from English Heritage providing information about their blue plaque scheme.  The letter had been copied to Councillor Talbot-Ponsonby.

 

230/04            PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 

There were fourteen members of the public present in respect of various applications on the agenda.

 

231/04            PLANNING APPLICATIONS 

The Committee considered forms and drawings for applications relating to the Town of Berkhamsted which had been received from Dacorum Borough Council up to the date of the meeting and it was 

                        RESOLVED 

That Dacorum Borough Council is informed of the Council’s comments and observations, if any, as follows.  The Council also trust that due regard will be taken of any objections which may be received from neighbours in the vicinity. 

 

4/1826/02/FUL          AMENDED & ADDITIONAL PLANS – Land at Tunnel Fields, (adj. Greenfields), New Road, Northchurch.  (NG) 

Support for 16 houses because they do not detract from the recommendation made on 14th July 2003. 

Object to any proposed link road until a formal application has been made showing the justification for such a road.

 

4/0608/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS - Removal of outbuilding, construction of two storey side extension at 8 Cobb Road. 

Support because the revisions further improve the original application.

 

4/0744/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS – Two storey rear extension, new front entrance and porch, alterations to garage at Murragh, Ivy House Lane.  (YE) 

Support as the proposals are exciting and would enhance the character of the building and street scene.

 

4/0842/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS – First floor extension over garage and conservatory to rear at 8 Priory Gardens.  (RF) 

Support as the proposed extension compliments the unique architectural style of the building and should be welcomed.

 

4/1047/04/FUL          Change of use from agricultural land to private golf practise area at land adj. Berkhamsted Golf Club, The Common.  (JC) 

                                    There were a number of members of the public present to object to this application.  Mr. Cyril Collins a resident of Castle Village, though not representing anyone else, said that his remarks were shared by a number of people including the Residents Association.  Mr. Collins read a long statement listing numerous points including: 

a.      Detrimentally altering the peace, (noise and light pollution), tranquillity and views in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

b.      Restricting a Right of Way.

c.      Danger from wayward golf balls. 

Mr. Collins showed members pictures of similar golf range fencing. 

                                    Object as the proposals are contrary to Policy 42 of both the Hertfordshire Structure Plan Review 1991-2011, the Hertfordhsire Structure Plan Alterations 2001-2016 Deposit Draft version, Policies 8, 73 & 90 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan and Policies 9, 79 & 96 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan Deposit Draft in that the site is within the Chiltern’s Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, wherein the prime consideration is the preservation of the natural beauty of the area.  The proposed application would result in the change from rough grazing to a more manicured grassed area.  The erection of a fence would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the site which would fail to preserve the natural beauty of the area.  There is a potential danger from golf balls to pedestrians using the public footpaths and to nearby properties.  There is also a possibility of increased traffic resulting from the new facilities which cannot be adequately catered for. 

                                    It is understood that a condition of the original Section 106 Agreement following the development of Castle Village required that the land subject of the application should be retained in its original state.  This condition should not be overturned.

 

4/1058/04/ROC        Variation of condition 2 of planning permission 4/2307/03 (Change of use from children’s nursery to restaurant/take away) to allow extended opening hours at ex Tool Hire premises, Berkhamsted Station, Lower Kings Road.  (SS) 

                                    The applicant was present to stress that the increased hours were at Silverlink’s request and only affected the morning hours. 

                                    Support as the proposed hours would provide a need for potential customers and it would not cause any level of disturbance.

 

4/1062/04/FHA         Conservatory and internal alterations at 19 West Road.  (FB) 

                                    Support as there are no material grounds on which to object.

 

4/1068/04/FHA         Two storey side extension at 11 Coram Close.  (TP) 

                                    Support as there are no material grounds on which to object.

 

4/1069/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension at 14 Montague Road.  (BC) 

                                    Support as the proposed extension is smaller and more sympathetic to that already approved (4/2187/01/FHA).

 

4/1074/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension at 2 Verney Close.  (TP) 

                                    Support both the two-storey side extension and garage as shown on drawings 0:00-0:03 as there are no grounds on which to object and that it makes good use of this highly visible plot of land.

 

4/1085/04/FHA         Patio extension at 5B Whybrow Gardens.  (FB) 

                                    Support as the general appearance of Whybrow Gardens has not been altered.

 

4/1092/04/FHA         Detached double garage and new entrance at Rushwood, Shootersway.  (TP) 

                                    Support as there are no grounds on which to object and that the proposed garage, although set back, would improve the appearance of the street scene.

 

4/1093/04/FHA         Demolish garage and construct two storey side extension at 22 Princes Close.  (RF) 

                                    Support as there are no material grounds on which to object.

 

4/1101/04/FHA         Extension of vehicle crossover and re-contouring and landscaping of front garden at 64 Upper Hall Park.  (TP) 

                                    Support as the design is attractive and provides suitable disabled access to the resident.

 

4/1104/04/FUL          Kidzone mini-tennis fenced area and pathway at Berkhamsted Lawn Tennis & Squash Club, Broadwater.  (NG) 

                                    Support as any encouragement for young children to take part in sport is to be welcomed and that there are no material grounds on which to object.

 

4/1115/04/FHA         Loft conversion with rear dormer at 53 Kitsbury Road.  (FB) 

                                    Object as the proposed dormer has an over-bearing impact on the roof by reason of its design, scale and siting.  They would fail to compliment or be in proportion to the existing building.  They would appear to be out of keeping with and have an adverse effect upon the character and appearance on this part of the Conservation Area.  The proposals are therefore contrary to Policies 8, 9 & 110 of the Borough Local Plan and Policies 9, 10 & 116 of the Borough Local Plan 1991-2011 Deposit Draft and Part 10 of the Environmental Guidelines.  The dormer size and window should relate to and align with the windows below.

 

4/1115/04/FHA         ADDITIONAL PLANS – Loft Conversion with rear dormer at 53 Kitsbury Road (FB). 

Object as the proposed dormer has an over-bearing impact on the roof by reason of its design, scale and siting.  They would fail to compliment or be in proportion to the existing building.  They would appear to be out of keeping with and have an adverse effect upon the character and appearance on this part of the Conservation Area.  The proposals are therefore contrary to Policies 8, 9 & 110 of the Borough Local Plan and Policies 9, 10 & 116 of the Borough Local Plan 1991-2011 Deposit Draft and Part 10 of the Environmental Guidelines.  The dormer size and window should relate to and align with the windows below.

 

4/1124/04/FHA         Rear first floor conservatory at Flat 4A, Cowper Road.  (JC) 

                                    Object as the proposed conservatory is obtrusive in that it would be clearly visible by the neighbours on either side and from the owner of the shared garden.  The conservatory should be located at ground or basement level unless the design can be carefully integrated into the existing building, which this has not by its height and width.

 

4/1126/04/FUL          Disabled parking bay and alterations at 199 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    Support as the works are required under the Disabled Discrimination Act.

 

4/1127/04/LBC         Disabled parking bay and alterations at 199 High Street.  (YE) 

                                    This building is not listed.

 

4/1138/04/TPO         Works to trees at land fronting 1 & 3 Midcot Way.  (BC)                                   

Support for the felling of the Sycamore due to its size and closeness to the house, which has made it vulnerable.  Support the pruning of the Prunus to prevent nuisance.

 

4/1144/04/FHA         Loft conversion at 36 Cross Oak Road.  (TP) 

                                    Support the loft conversion but oppose the rear dormer in that the dormer by its size does not align with the windows below and that it should be no larger.  Oppose the introduction of two roof lights on the front elevation in that they are obtrusive to the street scene and that any windows should be positioned to make them less obtrusive.

 

4/1145/04/FUL          Replacement underground fuel tanks, replacement car wash and plant room at Hall Park Service Station, London Road.  (TP) 

                                    Support as there are no material grounds on which to object and support the reduction of the canopy.  

If advertisement consent were required for the “On The Run” signage we would support this.   

It is recommended that a soil inspection takes place after the removal of tanks to check for fuel leakage. 

                                    This Petrol Station should not be closed until the Total Garage, which is currently being rebuilt, is operational.

 

4/1148/04/FHA         Relocation of boundary fence at 38 Oakwood.  (TP) 

                                    Object as the proposed relocation of a front pavement fence would be harmful to the character of the area in that it is not sympathetic to other front boundaries in the street scene.

 

4/1149/04/TPO         Fell Birch, works to Beech and Poplar at 4 Tower Close.  (RB) 

                                    Object as the extent of the works seem excessive which the Tree Officer would be able to confirm. 

 

4/1161/04/FUL          Conversion of office to 3 flats at Warehouse Planning Ltd., 142 High Street.  (TP) 

                                    Support as the proposal of “Living Above The Shop” is to be welcomed and is in line with Government guidelines, but concerns had been expressed about available parking space.

 

4/1172/04/FHA         Two-storey side extension at 27 Hill View.  (RF) 

                                    Support as there are no material grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1176/04/FUL          Replacement of 77 High Street with 2 one-bed flats and development to the rear of a 2-storey terrace of 14 one-bed flats with associated parking and access (DUPLICATE APPLICATION).  (JC) 

                                    A local resident was present and complained that letters had not been sent to neighbouring properties notifying them of the duplicate applications. 

                                    Object due to the unsafe nature of the access to and from the site, loss of privacy and amenity to residents in Victoria Road and Highfield Road by overlooking and potential pollution to those residents by light. 

                                    It is strongly recommended that a site visit takes place to include representatives of Hertfordshire Highways and especially at peak traffic times in order to fully appreciate the dangerous nature of the access/egress.   

                                    It was noted that there was no information available from Hertfordshire Highways concerning the traffic implications of the application.

 

4/1177/04/CAC         Demolition of dwelling (DUPLICATE APPLICATION).  (JC) 

Object due to the unsafe nature of the access to and from the site, loss of privacy and amenity to residents in Victoria Road and Highfield Road by overlooking and potential pollution to those residents by light. 

                                    It is strongly recommended that a site visit takes place to include representatives of Hertfordshire Highways and especially at peak traffic times in order to fully appreciate the dangerous nature of the access/egress. 

 

4/1181/04/FHA         Single storey side extension and double garage at 3 The Spinney.  (JA) 

                                    Support as there are no material grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1181/04/FHA         AMENDED DESCRIPTION –Detached double garage, single storey side extension and rear conservatory at 3, The Spinney (JA). 

                                    Support as there are no material grounds on which to oppose.

 

4/1187/04/FHA         Single storey rear extension at 11 Finch Road.  (JA) 

                                    Object as the proposed rear extension and conversion of the garage would increase the original ground floor living space by 107% which is out of keeping with the adjoining houses all of a similar design and size.   

                                    Object to the raised platform because of its adverse impact by its visual appearance on this attractive road with its avenue of trees.

 

4/1187/04/FHA         AMENDED PLANS & AMENDED DESCRIPTION – Single storey rear extension and parking pad to front of 11 Finch Road.  (JA) 

Object as the proposed rear extension and conversion of the garage would increase the original ground floor living space by 107% which is out of keeping with the adjoining houses all of a similar design and size.   

                                    Object to the raised platform because of its adverse impact by its visual appearance on this attractive road with its avenue of trees.

 

4/1204/04/FHA         Single storey side and rear extension at 10 Shrublands Road.  (YE) 

                                    Object as the roof profile is higher and out of keeping with all the canopies on this row of eight houses and therefore detracts from the visual appearance of the Conservation Area opposite. 

                                    If amended drawings are to be submitted these should include how the rear extension relates to its neighbour at no. 12.

 

4/1213/04/FUL          Partial demolition of existing warehouse and construction of new dwelling at rear of 101 George Street.  (AP) 

                                    Object on account of over-development of the site as it would leave no amenity space for either the new dwelling nor that of no. 101.  The proposed south facing window, being large, would cause a degree of overlooking onto the front garden of 99A George Street and the rear of no. 101.  There would be a further increase in traffic in an already congested area.

 

4/1229/04/FHA         Part single storey, part two storey rear extension, High Garth, North Road (JC). 

Support as there are no material grounds on which to object.

 

4/1234/04/OUT         Dwelling at 21 Hall Park.  (BL) 

Support as there are no material grounds on which to object.

 

232/04            PLANNING APPEAL 

4/0897/03/FHA         Demolition of kitchen/double garage and construction of replacement side extension at Hanbury’s, Shootersway. Details of the planning appeal were noted.

 

233/04            PLANNING DECISIONS 

                        The planning decisions circulated with the agenda were noted.

 

234/04            CLOSE OF MEETING

 The meeting closed at 9.15 p.m.