Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
« November 2014 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
You are not logged in. Log in
Enigmatic Howler
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Bibio - Mind Bokeh (2011)

Dirty Beaches – Badlands (2011)

09.04.11  I’m pretty annoyed with ordinal reviews, or track-by-track enumerations that yield scores of 95.147 for OK Computer, but I find myself slipping into that when I basically like everything about an album—and especially, as in the case of Badlands, when it feels like there’s so little to even mention. Whether or not it’s an EP is moot and anachronistic, but I like it the way I would like an extraordinarily good EP, my heart pumped full of hope for broader horizons (indiscernible, perhaps, in the blurry pan-out of the final two tracks). Because digging right in feels like embarking on a comprehensive task: “Horses” has something you might call a noise-solo, if only because of where it appears structurally and the way the album tucks all of its sounds into some sort of a vanishing point, that consists of layered reverberating clicks, and that’s its noise solo; the huge/distant pile of coalescing synths in the middle of “Sweet 17” could be the utmost in tomfoolery if they didn’t make the song by being absolutely out of place, giving its sparse rockabilly rumble an absolute nemesis to cut back through. But I’d be lying if I said the one-two punch of “True Blue” and “Lord Knows Best” weren’t the most important tracks here for situating the album in relation to its soul. Okay, they’re beamed out of a 50s or 60s slowdance, clearly, but transmitted from some lone radio amidst the album’s rubble long after the yearning hearts have broken and turned to ash. It’s a time-panorama of hope vs. despair that you just don’t get much these days, and if I return to this album way more than I ever did Suicide (1977) it’s because it doesn’t need a psychotic killer to prove that it isn’t fucking around: just ordinary, selfcircling teenagers and their desire’s ever-narrowing beam of light. 8

 

Siriusmo vs. SebastiAn

09.02.11  Even though they both began as top-notch year-end-list-candidate material, and remain pretty damned similar to boot, my TMT coworkers have planted in me the need to explain why Siriusmo’s Mosaik (2011) is much easier to return to than SebastiAn’s Total (2011). Struggling to articulate what it was about dubstep (neither of these being dubstep) that people love even as they’re vomiting out their pregame, I stumbled upon the analogy of being pushed—the bass drops toss the listener around like a rag doll, and if you’re someone who likes to have two feet on the ground, there is a repulsive element. Total builds itself entirely out of the rattling (apparently distinctly 2007) electrothrottle, and makes its art the art of subtraction: sonic in all the most delightful ways. The Neptunes-y end of “Embody” really completing the song for me, and so on. It’s a “ride,” and the glory of Siriusmo’s “Einmal In Der Woche Schreien” had me vaguely terrified that his album would be a ride, too. But even as Mosaik is a little long, I’m hanging onto its every developmental twitch, each handled with the grace of a composer and the knowing smile of a sidestepping Cary Elwes character. More than anything, the album is fun—right off the bat, it’s playing with the bluesy accidentals of a singing toddler, and we won’t even get into the Fratwerk “Feed My Meatmachine”—and it can therefore afford to relax laterally a bit. I love how “Idiologie” fails repeatedly to launch straight into its arpeggio, and the tingling height to which “Nights Off” rises before it’s let down for the crack constitutes one of those classic pop tricks brought to the next echelon. I know Siriusmo can keep a secret, because he does for most of the album, so I really don’t feel haughty laughing; rather than grinning at the obviousness of what’s coming, I’m grinning with everyone who sees it coming and plants. 8/7.5

 

Bibio - Mind Bokeh (2011)

07.15.11  Thankfully, thankfully, I hold on to documents rather than personalities. This tendency allows me to immerse in groups like the Smashing Pumpkins—even as Billy Corgan releases videos in which he, flannelled, cannot pronounce the name of his new album (Oceana; me neither, but so what?)—simply because they (he) had a historical/psychological/artistic moment in which he communicated himself through that medium better than he ever could as a human being. “Muzzle” the most recent heartfuck; that he knows the silence of the world and screams into it. The furious irrational pride that Corgan kicked out his mortal bandmates during the Siamese Dream sessions leaves my friends agape. My problem is that I think such documents are worth it. Then of course there’s YHF, my AOTD, the caliber of which I’ve so detached from Wilco themselves (besides Jay mayb) that I tag my continual divebombs and feints to avoid crushing myths “Sky-Blue-Sky-out.” I know I sound like a cynical mofo sometimes, but I don’t like the hate. If it weren’t for that lovely impressionistic title, perhaps, I’d’ve Sky-Blue-Skied-out on Mind Bokeh for everyone’s sake. You’ll see that I’m not going to review Panda Bear.

The trouble with Mind Bokeh is simply that Bibio got applauded in 2009 for, and thus continues to make, “personality music.” At different levels, a lot of what he’s attempting to do now—selfish work, about him, not a single cessation of control to his surroundings—really requires a personality to pull off. What we’ve realized since then is that he apparently has none; the smooth tracking of “Anything New” sounds like a purposeful attempt to be someone, but who? Though Mind Bokeh at its worst suggests the opposite of such flat failings: “Take Off Your Shirt” is absolutely nothing but personality, and if we for a single moment take the the AC/DC buzz and Anthony Kiedis gargle at face value, then Bibio is simply one unlikable dude. The pale, sluggish funk-by-way-of-wah numbers offend slightly less, but what my mind starts to parse occasionally is that he’s still got some off-kilter cycles going in these songs that are on the surface simply unlistenable swill—like, the exact pattern of Allman-Bros.-3rds in “Shirt,” for example.

But the elfin and utterly incorruptible one-trick pony—the purity, the stubborn and almost ludditic craft, of early stuff is part of the reason this album maybe suffers a bit more than Caribou’s similar glo-fi travesty Swim—locked inside the whirligig acoustic cogs of Hand Cranked (2006) must remain safely within that record; to the credit of my listening psyche, that Bibio will not be harmed in the making of faceless genre exercises. Anyway, more of the record recedes tortoiselike into the lazily maximal purdy-I-guess arrangements and can be easily-forgotten-if-poisonous DDT spray. Poor, artistically invertebrate Bibio can’t go back even if he wanted to, but never caring about the personality in the first place, I can return whenever I want. Ө

FTR: Hand Cranked (2006) 7.5


Posted by enigmatichowler at 1:11 PM EDT
Updated: Friday, November 11, 2011 11:09 AM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, January 6, 2011
December 2010 Updates: Beach House, Jaga Jazzist, Massive Attack, Owen Pallett

I've had a year to digest these, and a lot of them have just sat on my computer, so I'm trying to get these gestalten cracken so I can wipe the albums I don't really want to hear again.

Beach House – Teen Dream

12.02.10   I know, it’s a classic douche move to turn on your favorite artists just as soon as “everyone” starts liking them, but my problem with what happened with Teen Dream is that listeners admit that Beach House is more Fleetwood Mac than Galaxie 500 now. The haziest, droniest organs in the world—such good taste that I almost plopped one of their first two albums onto my decade list as a nod—have been replaced by literock jangle. It’s a good thing they’re still really good songwriters, because you still get a dose of something stirring that their production has anaesthetized. “Norway” is taut between the two: the syrupy “ha” bit overtakes what could be a disorienting gestalt in those slide guitars so whammied they’re almost in a different key. Part of the problem is that these guys just melt live, one of the best ever, really, and the last time I saw them (2009 Baltimore Round Robin) they took a claustrophobic room of gimmicks and cyclically flooded it with something totally overwhelming. They had a drummer, they had noise solos, they had fire. The most dazzling piece was this very album’s “Used To Be”; the recorded single of the same year was a little daintier; now this version has been, like, beheaded. That outro, that riveting outro that laid it so bare—“even if I try so hard, would we still be coming to an end?”—is now a Christmas-special “coming home any day now.” So is the entire point of the song effectively reversed? The question, “are you not the same as you used to be?” answered with, “no, just the same.” As someone who doesn’t frequent live shows like he probably should, I buy but continue to resent the whole cliché about studio sterility, that you can’t conjure the same oomph in there. Besides, Victoria’s voice is still the best part of this album (“Walk in the Park”s “in a matter of time” makes me just ache for more memorable production). Their arrangements just draw from different idols when they’re behind closed doors. To be clear, I still basically support these guys, and the number below would’ve told you as much. But I’m telling you, space is their ally—and in an age when shows are holding up the music career better than album sales ever did, making a record that’s so easy to improve upon is a smart move. 7.5

Dust From 1000 Years – Marble Memo

[TMT] 8

1.06.10 One year ago, that new job with TMT, was an exciting time, and I was thinking I'd be lucky to get anything worth a damn in the mail. DF1000Y wasthe sort of unknown whose slo-fi aesthetic really wowed me, but I didn't end up pulling it out that many more times. For some reason I got a little wound up after the review was published with the history of the band: that this new frontman had basically written all the songs for the first time, etc. Then I think I read some cut lines from "Silver Surfer Shoes" that said "the other ones are gay," and I'm thinking, this is just some guy who happens to write good self-reflexive songs. But just some guy, and lest we forget, I'm a misanthropist. I still basically support them, but it's the only 4-star review I turned my back on at the end of the year. >> 7.5

Eluvium – Similes

1.18.10  Man, I was really turned off by hearing Cooper’s vocals at first—like Fennesz, the introduction of a human personality after multiple full albums developing his textural “voice” seemed a little crass, and their plainness drew my attention to the “this is just a fruit-loop with synths” shadow that lurks beyond all beautiful stuff (Eno, working backwards, didn’t have this problem even though he sounds even more “some guy” than Cooper). But then I realized he’s still really good at what he’s always done, that is, making new-agey ambient music. And unlike Fennesz, his vocals really don’t ruin your moment when you’re getting used to them—they’re warm and full like Mark Kozelek or someone who makes warm/full folk music. He hasn’t quite mastered the ambient-to-vocal tension and release that, say, Natural Snow Buildings really nail—so much a part of me that I’m actually bummed when a steady build doesn’t end in vocals—but in the end I’m glad that he feels welcome in his own landscapes when he wants some humanity instead of puppeteering some guests in. Tough to write about, what else is new, but I’m grateful Eluvium’s keeping it real. 7.5

Gentle Friendly – Ride Slow

[TMT] 7.5

Jaga Jazzist – One-Armed Bandit

12.18.10  What would happen if Gerry Rafferty were in different time signatures, replete with Philip Glass counterpoint? Jaga Jazzist wonders, scratching their heads, but I have a quick answer: it’d be kinda annoying. It’d give you a shoo-fly feeling. I’m on a tenuously high horse here, but I feel bombarded with proof that there’s something wrong with music that’s too knotted and cerebral. i.e. this stuff sounds nothing like, but occupies the same brain-turf, as Primus. Les Claypool was “too good” for Metallica, damned straight—this stuff is too good for me, maybe. Some stuff I just shun instinctively, usually the stuff that breaks down boundaries between everything but the group and its own ego. Someone tells me there’s irony here and a switch will go off, but the music doesn’t exude it without Steve Zissou. There’s gotta be a name for this sort of nu-jazz fusion—and how could the word fusion, so great in theory, have killed itself off?: a less consistently Balkan Alamaailman Vasarat, the addled hare to Tortoise’s… tortoise. It’s dad-prog, for the ones who used to listen to Yes and have a certain bar for tortuousness of songcraft, but still need a basically soothing yachtastic aesthetic of reverbed sax, marimba, drum brushes. So when, like, the buzzing organ comes in briefly in the title track or the sputtering electronics come in on “Music! Dance! Drama!” I already know they lost a few audience members. If they get any more self-contradictory they’ll cancel out their whole audience by virtue of disparate gut-reactions. Hence, the shoo-fly feeling: its fans will rejoice that those of us in some sort of middle territory have no idea what kind of person—philistine or snob—just preferring it off makes us. Ө

Loscil – Endless Falls

[TMT] 7.5

1.06.11 Well I could've told you this would happen. >>

Massive Attack – Heligoland

1.05.11  “Pray For Rain” sounds like a pretty good TV on the Radio song, which might be like no duh, but unfortunately this band’s at the sad point where you can draw conclusions from its leadoff track. The conclusion is that, at its best, Heligoland sounds like a mixtape of contemporary alternative musicians heavily informed by Massive Attack’s work (Elbow: damn straight) from the 90s. But what does that say for the music, that the tiniest shred of vocal personality spongily absorbs it? It’d be doing its job right if this were hiphop, which has proven itself to be that sort of all-consuming Monster, hell, they’d do well to produce any of these guys, but Massive Attack don’t need to make any point about the breadth of their influence by now. I hope that’s obvious to them. Meanwhile, they’re still appropriating Martina Topley-Bird, whose so idiosyncratic and anachronistic that she’ll turn any song into trip-hop. Hope Sandoval’s generic track points to some queasy conclusions no one ever drew about how women function in trip hop; an Elizabeth-Fraser-esque post-career reinvention it ain’t. The question’s been asked before: can trip-hop even be done well nowadays? For awhile I was giddy about how relevant it sounded now for a flash-in-the-pan zeitgeist, but I’m letting go of its “growth” possibility (dubstep’s an OK mutation, at least the non-vomitous stuff I’ve heard). Heligoland isn’t Mixed Race, which sounds to the Maxinquaye-baptized like a totally different but somehow even less relevant persona, but it does have a very familiar sort of discomfort that comes from hearing the wizened try to make contemporary albums. I chalk it up, especially for bands that use technology, to the loudness wars. Read Nick Southall’s “Imperfect Sound Forever” for context, but hearing good ol’ Massive Attack “translated” into this compressed junk adds stark contrast to their understandably cooked brains and the whole contemporary soundscape. Like the clean organ arpeggios in “Atlas Air” might sound better cutting through the murk of 90s production, and probably any of the drums would be better sampled live than machinated. All that being said, you can’t fault them for being lazy: the album’s not just thumb-twiddling loops—there’s some excellent development on the first half, above and beyond, really. The cliché is that people assume well-known bands are elevated for being well-known, but I’m gonna suggest that the opposite is the case here. This is at least as interestingly constructed as This Is Happening, and I think if James Murphy concocted those choirs at the end of “Splitting the Atom” instead of a few old guys who don’t sound creepy anymore, people’d be cheering him on. I won’t cheer or even necessarily listen any more, but I know how to nod when it’s due.

Scout Niblett – The Calcination of Scout Niblett

12.03.10   I was going applaud Niblett for concept and dock her for “sameyness,” or what, that her ideas get steadily uglier and risker throughout, but screw that. I didn’t do a great job listening to this record in 2010, but Niblett was absolutely in my thoughts—unexpectedly, it was the syncopated “Lucy Lucifer” that bubbled up the most—and so she ends up being one of the voices of the year that I won’t ever forget. The beginning of 2010 was a tough time for me, getting used to the often-headachey taste of TMT compatriots, downloading myriad 4-star picks in a furor and taking off-days to listen to horror-noise while I scrubbed the cabinets, feeling a bit like Ellen Burstyn in Requiem. Calcination was understandably mishandled; I could hear that the album made a spectacular bid for better early-PJ-Harvey torment than, to be sure, late PJ-Harvey, and I knew I had massive respect for her setup: mostly just a single guitar and a single voice. The early Black Keys and White Stripes stuff let their blues intervals bleed through the speakers like this bliss, but their purpose was always communal, a cultural celebration. The listener was invited. Niblett’s so much closer to that immense loneliness of which the blues was birthed, and her Calcination is an inner-world story like Portishead’s Third. “Just Do It” is almost too good an example of anything to mention, but as a statement of purpose (and, for awhile, the unfortunate favorite of mine) it does what it needs: you expect a percussive backbone to lock into step with that mudsucking guitar after a few bars, but it never does, and all of a sudden the album’s best technical questions are at the fore. Isn’t there anyone else for her to coordinate with? Does she even have a metronome? Is she just really good at maintaining her own rhythm? Or is she? Does it matter? Then the fuzz cuts out, and it’s just the skeleton of the ascending guitar we once knew. “And the voices said, ‘just do it,’ and I think that I agree.” Mostly her voice is a vehicle for words (“why would you think that you make me drink? I’m a drunk, reasons I don’t need”), winding through whatever half steps she’s surrounded by, and this makes the handful of melodic moments feel more like references to classic songwriters. But holy shit do they shine through the darkness. Niblett carves out so much dynamic space for herself that she doesn’t need to rely on more than one or two basic guitar foundations for her songs, and she’s a vivid enough performer to add little twists without taking off. And, get this: the real meat of the album, which is the insane constructions that appear between soundwaves, only works if she’s not perfectly mechanized, and doesn’t mind that our steely ears are locked on her. I think that’s what I was originally afraid of—I knew there was some real talent here at a time when I was ready to vomit white noise and supposedly gripping music. I set it aside a little too long, but it paid off. 8

Owen Pallett – Heartland

1.11.11  I was an early detractor of Pallett’s lunatic antics in Final Fantasy back when I thought an upbeetmusic review meant something (archived elsewhere—dude actually broke my heart with a thank-you email) and while I’m not surprised his cleaned-up act got its annoying kinda-hafta eight-point-something, my opinion on him hasn’t changed much. That is, he’s a really bizarre counterpart to more successful classically-trained musicians like Andrew Bird, Arthur Russell, more recently Dirty Projectors. Pallett’s sense of humor isn’t the same poor taste, but song titles like “Oh Heartland, Up Yours!” still leave me cockeyed. Theoretically the song itself is supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek “relevant political statement,” but it only works that way in theory when his songs have Schoenberg-autotune melodies. Like I said, a cleaner foray—he’s really tempting me with the droney loops, of course, and “Red Sun No. 5” was hypnotic enough to slip into a radio show many months ago—but in a lot of cases the polish sorta outlines the rocky stuff that’s still hard to swallow. I don’t swallow the vocal narratives, I don’t swallow the peaky string blasts, I don’t swallow the Grizzly-Bear-esque harmonies and arrangements—I ruminate, absolutely, and mad respect for being such a distinctive musical presence, but this guy needs to get him some resiliently chill collaborators before his decisions feel like more than facial tics. √

Surfer Blood – Astro Coast

[TMT] 7.5

Toro Y Moi – Causers of This (2)

1.10.10   Merriweather was the torchbearer, I’m convinced, but just like AC blew past the du jour “freak-folk” of Sung Tongs, I’mma sound like an idiot saying they’re glo-fi-chillwave-hypnagogic either pretty soon. Here’s a more stable reference: Toro Y Moi stands in for Neon Indian, Memory Tapes, and myriad others that I really only hear by accident nowadays. Like MPP, Causers represents more of an excess than a specific—I glance at Koushik and realize this stuff didn’t start with that nominal trifecta, though the fact that it’s swallowing good artists like Caribou is pretty new. But OK: same old diatribe here, except my complaint with this one is actually pretty specific. “Lissoms” comes on, and I’m irritated that Chaz is jerking off the masterfade like that, fading the entire thing in and out like Haunted Houses would do with genuine broken microphones later in the year (or the Wrens on “Everyone Choose Sides”). Dude’s trying to replicate something that actually happens in *real* acoustics when you hear a really loud sound: sonic boom? Not quite. You’ll recognize it; you’ll think your eardrums are breaking like shoddy mics. For music so compressed, hearing the entire waveform collapse to zero and rise up again in something like a rhythm is kinda stomach-churning. Not just one song, either—I jotted “Thanks Vision” and stopped jotting when I heard it the third time. It’s practically the concept that holds the album together, and it’s fitting: glo-fi can tap into the laws of space while eschewing most of them. Like the auditory equivalent of CGI, you just don’t listen to it the same way, its attempts to be perfect are what kill it, you can be sure it’ll be awhile before anyone’s fooled. Ө

Untied States – Instant Everything, Constant Nothing

[TMT] 7.5

Posted by enigmatichowler at 11:15 AM EST
Updated: Friday, July 15, 2011 4:33 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Two Lists
2010 ALBUMS OF THE YEAR

 

1. Chris Rehm - Salivary Stones
Genera: Drone, Ambient, Noise
RIYL: Yellow Swans, Sean McCann
Plug: Each track uses the track before it like yarn. 

2. Broken Water - Whet
Genera: Noise Pop
RIYL: Sonic Youth, Dinosaur Jr
Plug: But those wizened haven't had to stake ground with a taut debut since the 80s.

3. Tallest Man on Earth - The Wild Hunt
Genera: Folk, Signer-Songwriter
RIYL: Bob Dylan, Deer Tick
Plug: Everyone's outrage about "Kids on the Run" should indicate that the album did its job.

4. Dinowalrus - %
Genera: Nor Wave, Ambient Post-Punk
RIYL: Spacemen 3, early Deerhunter
Plug: Digital vacuums come easy, but there's nothing like the sound of a psychological vacuum. TMT REVIEW

5. Perfume Genius - Learning
Genera: Lo-Fi, Ballad
RIYL: Daniel Johnston, Antlers, Elliott Smith
Plug: This is the best kind of role that music can play in both musician and listener's lives.

6. Elephant Micah - Plays the Songs of Bible Birds
Genera: Lo-Fi, Trad Folk
RIYL: Red House Painters, Neil Young, Thanksgiving
Plug: A vaulted cross-section of faith and questions that no one was dying to answer. TMT REVIEW

7. Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti - Before Today
Genera: I refuse to call this "glo-fi."
RIYL: Gary Wilson, R. Stevie Moore, Beach Boys, Todd Rundgren, Frogs
Plug: Think of the meandering genius who "could get straight A's if he just tried"--what I'm saying is, I think Ariel Pink won a bet with this one.

8. Heaven And - Bye and Bye I'm Going to See the King
Genera: Free-Jazz-Blues, Post-Rock-Noise
RIYL: Talk Talk, Jackie-O Motherfucker, Autistic Daughters
Plug: Ever watch primordial soup? TMT REVIEW

9.  Islaja - Keraaminen Paa
Genera: Art Pop
RIYL: Kate Bush, Lau Nau, Bjork
Plug: More anachronistic than EM or TMOE, because she hearkens back to Art-Pop, a time when folks rolled with the punches.

10. Zs - New Slaves
Genera: Harsh Noise, Free Jazz, Ambient
RIYL: Shit.
Plug: God bless "controlled conditions" or I'd be hanging from my ceiling by now; that being said, beauty was the bigger surprise.

11. Mat Riviere - Follow Your Heart
Genera: Gloomy Synth-Pop; wait!
RIYL: John Maus, Casiotone for the Painfully Alone, Roommate
Plug: "You've never known the evening drive. You've never known the back of his fist in the winter."

12. Lower Dens - Twin-Hand Movement
Genera: shoegaze
RIYL: (Jana Hunter), White Magic, Mazzy Star
Plug: Shoegaze is best approached from this direction: Jana could always fly, she just needed a leg up.

13. Women - Public Strain
Genera: Noise-Pop, Angular Prog-Pop
RIYL: The Fire Show, Untied States, Brainiac
Plug: Even pulling out the stops, form by way of structure could seem too brainy to some--I bask in the shadow of old Shins comparisons.

14. Gonjasufi - A Sufi and a Killer
Genera: Psycho-Dub, Lo-Fi
RIYL: Malachai, Tom Waits, George Clinton
Plug: Sumach Ecks knows he is a messenger, the chosen one--though by God or Satan he cannot wring.

15. Superchunk - Majesty Shredding
Genera: Power Pop, Guitar Rock
RIYL: 12 Rods, Sebadoh, Archers of Loaf
Plug: After more than 20 years heading Merge, Mac McCaughan is still in it for the right reasons, and when I'm listening to this, I feel like I still am too.

16. Kurt Weisman - Orange
Genera: falsetto-folk, Renaissance minstrelsy
RIYL: Chad VanGaalen, Van Dyke Parks, the Books
Plug: Eminently likable for first-timers, and a mightily impressive distillation to those who know the creative monster lurking inside of him. TMT REVIEW

17. Sun City Girls - Funeral Mariachi
Genera: Avant Pop, Arab Folk, Ragam
RIYL: Pere Ubu, Thinking Fellers Union Local 282, Sunburned Hand of the Man
Plug: Both disappointed and relieved that they gave us space to breathe on their swan song, but the best parts are still incommunicable and desperate.

18. Janelle Monae - The Archandroid
Genera: R&B, Postmodern Pastiche
RIYL: Avalanches, Outkast
Plug: I lack context, and this album is built out of it.

19. Dylan Ettinger - New Age Outlaws
Genera: Freeform, Electronic
RIYL: Brian Eno, Jon Hassell, Emeralds
Plug: Refreshingly homespun electronic, so even as he's building his cities they're crumbling.

20. O Paon - Courses
Genera: pendulum pop, loop hymn
RIYL: (Woelv), Fursaxa, Juana Molina
Plug: The looping pedal meticulously recruits armies for Castee's bidding, but she still sounds utterly, utterly alone. TMT REVIEW

21. Gil Scott-Heron - I'm New Here
Genera: spoken word, PSA-hop
RIYL: Saul Williams, Langston Hughes, Kanye West
Plug: Dude's, like, an undying entity, a chunk of cultural consciousness, even as he's also an emaciated heroin addict in New York City--so the real hero here is Richard Russell for keeping our eyes focused with the right lenses.

22. Sam Prekop - Old Punch Card
Genera: analog synthesizer experiments
RIYL: (The Sea and Cake), Fennesz, Nuna Canavarro, Scott Tuma
Plug: Convinces us, better than any treatise, to have faith that chaos will produce beauty; cheats by not actually being chaos. TMT BLURB

23. Malachai - Ugly Side of Love
Genera: Reggae, Psych-Pop, Turntabling
RIYL: 13th Floor Elevators, The Congos, MF Doom
Plug: Aged and growing fuzz from a time when psych an garage meant the same thing, Malachai's album dexterously gloms cliches to make something that's uniquely his.

24. Laurie Anderson - Homeland
Genera: spoken word, art-pop
RIYL: Jane Siberry, Yoko Ono, David Sylvian
Plug: I put my life on the line to defend this gauzy priestess against contemporary avant-gardists who prefer the sound of air being let out of balloons for like fifteen minutes on La Vase/Slikke.

25. Infinite Body - Carve Out the Face of My God
Genera: ambient, shoegaze
RIYL: Ulaan Khol, Roy Montgomery, Philip Jeck
Plug: The obsessive impetus will never be clear from the music itself, but I didn't expect myself to try so hard to like this, to etch mental contours, to take joy in sudden familiarities, to be beckoned back.

RUNNERS UP: See original list.

 

2000-2009 ALBUMS OF THE DECADE

As tweeted on a 3-per-day basis @unicornmang inMay & June 2011.

1. Wilco - Yankee Hotel Foxtrot (2002)
Not about Wilco, nor the story. I have yet to hear a refutation of the YHFcentric universe model.

2. David Thomas Broughton - The Complete Guide to Insufficiency (2005)
See title; my #1 when I'm more a human being than a writer/fanboy.

3. Department of Eagles - The Whitey on the Moon UK LP (2003)
The sort of eerie that can only come from partying with dust bunnies.

4. Portishead - Third (2008)
You really fucked it up for any group that wants to make a passive/sterile comeback ever again, Portishead.

5. Solex - Low Kick and Hard Bop (2001)
"This needs to be in a Quentin Tarantino movie." Both of us like kids in a candy store.

6. The National - Alligator (2005)
They'll prolly continue to make good U2 albums forever; this scrap collision is the waterworks, though.

7. Yo La Tengo - And Then Nothing Turned Itself Inside-Out (2000)
No one expected them to invent again a whole new kind of warm & honest.

8. Califone - Roots & Crowns (2006)
My sweet lord, when they maxed out on songwriting and noise simultaneously. This they goddamn OWN.

9. Supersilent - 6 (2003)
I get the sense that the hollow'd synth-epic has a long history, but picture me giving a damn. Here is no why.

10. Radiohead - Kid A (2000)
Anxious, millenarian cogs. I'm an obstinate guy, but I can no longer deny that this album is my blueprint.

11. Manitoba - Up In Flames (2003)
After Swim I vowed to return to Handsome Dick's moniker. Tidal, vast; it was never electronic.

12. Microphones - The Glow, Pt. 2 (2002)
Intricately orchestrated lo-fi never really took off -- probably b/c it's harder than it looks.

13. Modest Mouse - The Moon & Antarctica (2000)
No way is this a threshold of gnarled/mainstream. Fact, it's shaped exactly like the earth.

14. Broadcast - Tender Buttons (2005)
Their last: a beating battery, its stripped-duo sound bare, Trish human but her world tangled wire.

15. Califone - Quicksand/Cradlesnakes (2003)
Their shapeliest: dig the space, the transitions, the unscribbled lyrics, the bluegrass jams.

16. Six Organs of Admittance - School of the Flower (2005)
For a prolific artist, you gotta attribute it to the free jazz drummer's billow.

17. Antlers - Hospice (2009)
About belief: that a hurricane of words can map a relationship's contours, that music really can redeem us.

18. Books - The Lemon of Pink (2003)
The most meaningful glitch/electro-folk album I know.

19. Arcade Fire - Funeral (2004)
They say it fades if you let it.

20. Fog - 10th Avenue Freakout (2005)
Lonely & confused man funnels all his wants into Perfect Record, ends up lonelier and more confused.

21. Blackalicious - Blazing Arrow (2002)
Hip hop retrofuturism? Chugs on like the stigma never even happened, sharp yet somehow oldschool.

22. Dirty Projectors - The Getty Address (2005)
Oh Hell I'm a sucker. An electronic album comprised of jazz and Stravinsky refs. Donzos.

23. Amen Dunes - Dia (2009)
Just when you think it's gonna be all crooked 4track psych shapes and gummy drones, he hits you with SONGS.

24. Islaja - Ulual Yyy (2007)
The quandary: alien or tropically Darwin? Oh wait: Finnish. None, nor "Bjork's heiress," does it justice.

25. Akron/Family - s/t (2005)
You win, Liz. Vaporous folk has never has such sonic stitching. "Walking in circles that gradually grow."

26. Grandaddy - The Sophtware Slump (2000)
Anyone can play guitar? More like, anyone can record OK Computer. Touching poems by a robot.

27. Emperor X - Central Hug/Friendarmy/Fractaldune (And the Dreams that Resulted) (2005)
Funnest album ever.

28. Boards of Canada - Geogaddi (2002)
IDM junkies who skip a third of this album's tracks just don't want to admit how creeper it is.

29. Pumice - Pebbles (2007)
Best no-fi/"shitgaze" album of the decade. Without that hiss he couldn't blend his seizures and mires.

30. White Denim - Workout Holiday (2008)
Singer's flamboyant and guitars are oft spindly/African, but this is still punk as hell.

31. Wrens - The Meadowlands (2003)
Christ: emo that ages like red wine, but youre on a bender so you dont notice till it's vomit/catharsis.

32. Deltron 3030 - s/t (2000)
thus birthed clint eastwood, eh? krs-one-esque legend's rock solid topia on race and evolution.

33. Vic Chesnutt - North Star Deserter (2007)
This blacklunged troubador doesn't follow reasonable dynamics convention here. prepare to be bludgeoned.

34. Books - Thought For Food (2002)
No one's done pan-interconnectedness like this before or since.

35. Natural Snow Buildings - Shadow Kingdom (2009)
What gets me is how brevity can anchor length--wouldn't be the same w/o 13 mins.

36. War on Drugs - Wagonwheel Blues (2008)
An emblem of all I wish to stumble upon. Draw+quarter if necessary, but don't reverse footage.

37. Flaming Lips - Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots (2002)
A live rendition of one of the lesser songs here still towered over the set.

38. Odd Nosdam - Burner (2005)
We eventually have blind faith that the chords will ratchet. I eat up two-chord songs like I chow binaries.

39. Avey Tare and Panda Bear - Spirit They're Gone, Spirit They've Vanished (2000)
"Time to blow some motherfucking minds here." -NS

40. Four Tet - Rounds (2003)
A babushkan study in scale. Dated only b/c cultural producers don't know a thing of beauty when they hear it.

41. Clipse - Hell Hath No Fury (2006)
The distillery: not a culture-sensical drum, not a line sans venom, not a tone that won't die alone.

42. Keith Fullerton Whitman - Lisbon (2006)
Improvised vs. composed don't mean shit, and it takes a transcendental laptop-slice to say so.

43. Clap Your Hands Say Yeah - s/t (2005)
"You're really dating yourself with that shirt." Why must this gem last only as hype-metonym?

44. Elephant Micah - And the Loud Guitars (2004)
Oft-huge music by a twentysomething, supplants Solutions for something unreachably Bigger.

45. Woods - Some Shame (2008)
The Dead have nothing to do. This tour-only cassette by the, what, "lo-fi kingpins" still, reliably, uplifts.

46. cLOUDDEAD - s/t (2001)
Weirdly, "ambient hip-hop" practically says it all. No one was dumb enough to try THAT again. Ha! Whewf!

47. Mountain Goats - All Hail West Texas (2002)
The boombox's last gasp is enough to inflate lullabies to raw, beltalong proportions.

48. Cannibal Ox - The Cold Vein (2001)
Free jazz + psych-noise coiled into hip-hop = a Pere Ubu-esque carnival ride thru hate 'n' history.

49. Russian Futurists - Let's Get Ready to Crumble (2003)
DIY 'doxes like miniscule hugeness, flat depth, 80s kitchbag resonance.

50. Black Moth Super Rainbow - Dandelion Gum (2007)
A sticky microcosm. Falling in love, clubbing, basking, all through a compound eye.

51. Casiotone for the Painfully Alone - Twinkle Echo (2003)
The fuck can I say man. It's just an idea. It frees. It soars. It's my thing.

52. Dinosaur Jr. - Beyond (2007)
How many 80s legends reunite, throw in the towel to classic rock tropes and age, self-transcend yet fuse?

53. Dirty Projectors - The Glad Fact (2003)
Longstreth built it all from this: music theorist, nostalgic, winding through his chords.

54. Broadcast - Haha Sound (2003)
Probably their prettiest, certainly their most colored-in; the precedent both surer and further.

55. Thanksgiving - Welcome Nowhere (2004)
Pacific nw ludditic coziness, F BPB soundalike syndrome. Shout out to fairkid and that time.

56. Animal Collective - Feels (2005)
B4 mpp broke my heart and ate the musical landscape, this'un was both lush as hell and madd longit

57. Music Tapes - For Clouds and Tornadoes (2008)
Saw player for nmh tells all.

58. U.N.P.O.C. - Fifth Column (2002)
He's a melodic spider-monkey, but more importantly, his blistered voice is just impossible to forget.

59. Radiohead - In Rainbows (2007)
So the honeymoon is over; who cares? This album's still "I"mportant both to me and to their legacy.

60. Notwist - Neon Golden (2002)
This is the decade gestalt right here man, and too pared to sound dated. Some records just feel right.

61. Illogic - Celestial Clockwork (2004)
Burlap spokeword lyrics too heavy to sling like this. And the beats just get weirder and weirder.

62. Dirty Projectors - Bitte Orca (2009)
A victory lap as far as I'm concerned. In case anyone thought African scales were old hat...

63. Deer Tick - War Elephant (2007)
Smells like beer and onions, hurts like hell: "An eternal testament to how we are so animalistic."

64. Clinic - Internal Wrangler (2000)
Art-punk from another dimension, only marginally bruised from repetitive high-five followups.

65. Sufjan Stevens - Illinois (2005)
A labor of love/craft like Amish barn-raising. Cemented minimalism's "no duh" pop-throne with warmth.

66. Six Organs of Admittance - You Can Always See the Sun EP (2002)
Or the best track of the decade? What do you call the goddamn Sahara?

67. Broadcast - The Noise Made By People (2000)
Before Trish's humanity/mortality (RIP) they were an entity, rock-solid as an icy planet.

68. Koop - Waltz for Koop (2001)
A bubble bath in the sheer aesthetics of jazz: drum brushes/walking basslines. Too smooth for electronica.

69. Fiery Furnaces - Blueberry Boat (2004)
Shrewd harmonic archaeology for such a whoopee cushion opus. All tones are bound to some PLACE.

70. Sigur Ros - ( ) (2002)
The gutsy followup's still the album to beat, the wall to climb, etc. Perpendicular to heaven and hell.

71. Subtle - For Hero: For Fool (2006). "The utmost in luxury blood." So abstract and intricate, encapsulation mocks it like Derrida.

72. Jim O'Rourke - I'm Happy and I'm Singing and a 1, 2, 3, 4 (2001)
Every time I suspect this is a hipster bullshit pick, I snorkel again.

73. Unicorns - Who Will Cut Our Hair When We're Gone? (2003)
When I first heard it the phrase "furious indie pride" popped and didn't stop.

74. Xiu Xiu - Knife Play (2002)
I liked the arty smear of Stewart's internal pressure more than the tin cans of his external. Vomit detail.

75. Japandroids - Post-Nothing (2009)
"[The title]" indeed: only true blindness/true youth can breathe life into such Pabsty bro-wisdom.

76. Califone - Roomsound (2001)
Here: the dirt-clod tuber monolith they later hacked n electro-fried, in case you suspected tweren't there.

77. OOIOO - Armonico Hewa (2009)
Fuck Dungen, this is psych like GenXers yelt it. Like the mouth is still the best wah pedal we've got.

78. Destroyer - Your Blues (2004)
A peak twofer1 more than anything: schmaltz/sound obsession AND cryptic vox that knew what they wanted.

79. Fugazi - The Argument (2001)
Drives the "post" through their own "core," get it. No need for a running jump; it's caustic, it'll creep.

80. Ugly Casanova - Sharpen Your Teeth (2002)
An ode to The Album Project: I can't think of an album that's more of a dusty polaroid.

81. Kanye West - Late Registration (2005)
Floodgate after floodgate. If there's a revolution here, it's that history still breathes.

82. Tim Hecker - Harmony in Ultraviolet (2006)
Shudders like palimpsest, like it could mean something, like Earth makes this much noise.

83. Fiery Furnaces - Gallowsbird's Bark (2003)
I do not know what the hell sunk that made them want to stop rocking straight blues.

84. Radiohead - Amnesiac (2001)
Understandably the most exciting TIME to be a Radiohead fan: Squarepusher flush with smeary jazz, cmon.

85. Fire Show - St. the Fire Show (2002)
Post-noise: Brian Deck's color-arsenal aimed inward, pop bottles jabbing rims, and a mouth/a plea.

86. Prefuse 73 - Meditation Upon Meditations (2009)
Wait which one's that? Only the pastiche that almost shrugged its way out of happening.

87. Bjork - Vespertine (2001)
On the one hand, lamely automatic on both of our parts. But then falling asleep during sex can be meaningful.

88. Paavoharju - Laulu Laakson Kukista (2008)
Deejaying the silence surrounding the discotheque at night. An overtone rave, man.

89. Burial - Untrue (2007)
Back when he anonymously invented it in his parents' basement, I didn't expect anyone to argue "dubstep enough."

90. Sonic Youth - Sonic Nurse (2004)
Course it's not punk anymore, but veterans amber legacy and sculpt noise without even thinking.

91. Broken Social Scene - You Forgot It In People (2002)
An unlikely unifier/litmus test, all sandy jams & hihat hiss. But what carriage!

92. White Stripes - White Blood Cells (2001)
Said it once before but it bears retweeting now.

93. Micachu and the Shapes - Jewellery (2009)
Warped pop from a dimension housing a restless garbage lid/disposal & vacuum proletariat.

94. Function - The Secret Miracle Fountain (2006)
A worn document validating New Age nonsense, that watched twigs form shapes, etc.

95. The Good Life - Album of the Year (2004)
More P.O.V. than chronology, but this is better--beginning/middle/end in moment after moment.

96. TV on the Radio - Return to Cookie Mountain (2006)
Model intersection: lurch-loops/processed guitars as hollow arteries for the past.

97. Ned Collette - Jokes and Trials (2006)
Like watching homemade plastic-bag-parking-lot footage: The Antipunchline Strikes Nonetheless.

98. Spoon - Kill the Moonlight (2002)
If the Strokes were actually withholding/opaque/cool enough to "starve indie rock into new shapes."

99. Marmoset - Tea Tornado (2009)
How so many crawled out of their skin when this guy's sardine breath and denim were a little too close.

100. The New Pornographers - Twin Cinema (2005)
Springloaded power-pop can only once explode like this without sounding mad cheeseball.


Posted by enigmatichowler at 1:33 PM EST
Updated: Saturday, July 30, 2011 5:33 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, January 2, 2009

Weekly-Updated Listening Log, Or: Enough Ratings to Make Your Head Spin If That Floats Your Boat

2009 EOY AND EOD LISTS

Just gotta beat some peeps to the punch here. You'll notice that I was far too aggravated to actually rank these, so I listed them alphabetically. Using your infallible Venn Diagram reasoning you can probably wean one hierarchal message that I really wanted to communicate for 2009, and if you've talked to me in the past 4 years you'll know the one hierarchal message of the decade has been something of a... erm, fixture.

2009

Amen Dunes - Dia
Antlers - Hospice
Blues Control - Local Flavor
Califone - All My Friends Are Funeral Singers 
Circulatory System - Signal Morning
Dinosaur Jr. - Farm 
Dirty Projectors - Bitte Orca
Flaming Lips - Embryonic
Grizzly Bear - Veckatimest 
Japandroids - Post-Nothing 
Micachu - Jewellery
Mount Eerie - Wind's Poem 
Natural Snow Buildings - Shadow Kingdom
OOIOO - Armonico Hewa
Phantom Band - Checkmate Savage
Pontiak - Maker
Prefuse 73 - Meditation Upon Meditations
Wussy - Wussy
Yo La Tengo - Popular Songs
Zu - Carboniferous

2000s

Antlers - Hospice
Arcade Fire - Funeral
The Books - The Lemon of Pink
David Thomas Broughton - The Complete Guide to Insufficiency
Califone - Quicksand/Cradlesnakes
_____ - Roots and Crowns
Caribou (f.k.a./r.i.p. Manitoba) - Up In Flames
Department of Eagles - The Whitey on the Moon UK LP
Grandaddy - The Sophtware Slump
Islaja - Ulual Yyy
Microphones - The Glow Pt. 2
Modest Mouse - The Moon and Antarctica
The National - Alligator
Portishead - Third
Radiohead - Kid A
____ - In Rainbows
Six Organs of Admittance - School of the Flower
Solex - Low Kick and Hard Bop
Wilco - Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
Yo La Tengo - And Then Nothing Turned Itself Inside-Out

New Rating System

As per my essay "Numbness and Numbers," I don't think it's really helpful or even the same category of thought to assign ratings to things that I don't particularly like. So I have an idea about what a 7.5 is: it's good enough that I would be happy if someone put it on. Plenty of super-acclaimed artists make it onto this list if I have some positive reaction to their output; Fleet Foxes is a good example. But anything lower, in the tradition of Robert Christgau, will get adorable little wingdings:

- (Formerly bomb) For some reason or another it offends me that this album was made.

- (Formerly scissors) As is the case painfully often, the album contains one or two great highlights and is otherwise forgettable.

Ө - (Formerly flat-featured face) No strong response. You can like it a lot and I won't argue with you.

- Yep, it exists. Usually differentiated from Ө by sheer review length.  I have more of a gestalt with these, they don't blend so easily.

- It's definitely something, never managed enough listens to tell what exactly.

Also: email me at collin.anderson@oberlin.edu because if your response is thought provoking I'll post that too. I prefer this to the standard "look at how few people read this" Comments (0) format.

Algebra Suicide – The Secret Like Crazy (RRRecords, 1987)

10.13.09  Okok, distortion. Okok, Moe Tucker. Of the innumerable foundations the Velvets laid, I think the one most deserving of revival is the capacity to tell a vivid, rhythmically-spoken story over a chugging groove. It takes a toughened cool to do this, to maintain a durable pace of words while the world cycles on unawares. Thankfully, Lydia Tomkiw’s got the personality and twitchy vocabulary to pull it off and even one-up Lou Reed’s unfulfilled potential. Slather some drum machines, guitar loops that oscillate from glitz to grind, and you’ve got, remarkably, a left-field museum piece not unlike the Young Marble Giants: there was no other place nor decade than the 80s underground for this duo to exist. Call it the source: one of the few labeled tracks on about 10 discs of a late-80s radio show called Bad DNA with a penchant for female-led proto-shoegaze and Art Pop like Jane Siberry and the Cocteau Twins. To that end, I want to call Tomkiw a sort of feminist even if she’s closer to being a snotty (albeit college-nerdy) tomboy: either way, her calloused Brooklyn accent brings a certain disillusionment to life while framing those few moments of vulnerability.

And those blissful, blissful grooves, courtesy of minimalist mastermind Don Hedecker represent the people she watches, resents, appreciates, finds, in the end, some sort of beauty in. “(A Proverbial Explanation For) Why No Action Is Taken” is just that: observations, a string of sayings that render humans inert. “Idle hands / are the devil’s playlot / but we fear burning / our candles / at both ends.” More often, just when you think the swirl of words takes her cynicism beyond recognition, the song ends, Tomkiw’s found symmetry and so must we. “I wanna talk … about the invisible bones of the face, about this brain that sits too close to the skin, while I hear you tell me we could be ‘chainsaws under the stars.’” You can practically hear her smirk. “Under what stars?” The testament to the music is that when I listen to it I’m on Tomkiw’s side, and I too feel like I’ve won. Throw in the 1-to-2-minute track times, and anyone as malleable to weirdo cool as I am will have 20 tiny victories coming their way. 8

Aluk Todolo – Finsternis (Utech, 2009)

11.23.09  Anyone else notice those totally hopeless, reliably mishandled bits of hidden metadata a simple right click in iTunes can show you? One of them’s Beats Per Minute, the only devotee of which I can find is Trent Reznor. Bpm referring to the circulatory system and percussive machinery in equal measure, it’s not a surprise. See, metadata can actually say something of import about a group – it’s been said that Label (which has yet to columnate) is more important than artist in electronic music, to say nothing of genre-junkies. So why isn’t bpm programmed into French trio Aluk Todolo’s ID3s? Because, after all, Finsternis is an album with a few massive-seeming struggles, but it would help to see that it’s a fixed match. Would being given a flat “75bpm” ruin the biggest surprise that these five tracks have to offer (“Surprise! There is no surprise.”), accommodate the same peculiar brand of hopelessness that the listener learns to expect by the end? Somehow, this is totally unlike Spirit of Eden’s fusiform undulations: this is a zombie-eyed plod, and it’s antithetical to the sort of frustration that the various feedback storms ought to suggest. And they’re just that: meteorological, and never nearly as frustrated or creative or human as you wish. (The band’s probably great live, but any garage musician knows it can be tough to channel yourself fully into an instrument.) That they divide a singular ebb and flow into five sections only fleetingly maintains the illusion of development, of anything needing the shoulders of what’s come before it. The result is probably the biggest racket that I could ever fall asleep to, cause you know there’s no way the wall’s gonna break down.

Amen Dunes – Dia (Locust, 2009)

 

11.30.09  I have a neat little chaos theory when it comes to weirdos with big record collections who eventually try their hands at music. The idea is, inspiration bleeds into imitation, but when you try as hard as you can to imitate an idol in a DIY setting, you’re sure to miss the mark in a way that can actually be even more interesting than what you thought you were trying to do. Make sense? Like, your own uniqueness, even if it’s entirely a manifestation of incompetence, is mapped out in the degrees to which you didn’t (in my own band’s case) actually end up sounding like the fucking Microphones at all. Enter Sun-City-Girls-channeling neophyte Damon McMahon, aka Amen Dunes. You hear a lot of grotesque changelings in this stuff: a friend insists “By the Bridal” is “Bittersweet Symphony,” I recently realized the trebly rush of the band-titled surf-opener reminds me of “Fell in Love With a Girl,” and in the second half there’s a string of four songs that have all the evocative vibes of great folk songs, that whole “have I heard this on AM radio at some point” quality. But grotesque, cause Damon McMahon is an unavoidably weird guy, so he manages to own all of it, even as the album willfully progresses through many stages of awesome. I say Sun City Girls because of its hopscotch effect, but while Sir Richard Bishop is at a sketchy halfway point between legitimate World dissemination and the offensive Cheech/-ong accents of Ween, Amen Dunes never seems to be operating on such big stereotypic models. Sure, who can argue with the surf thing, but its more in the dilapidation, the crooked tumble of “Fleshless Esta Mira, Wife of Space” (to say nothing of its name), the uneasy awe of McMahon’s warbly vocal exorcism in “Breaker.”


But as I say, McMahon’s a little more organized about the whole affair, which behooves him in a breadth-over-depth culture. Like, Sun City Girls were kicking themselves for the neat bundle of Torch of the Mystics, wanted to remain sprawling and culty sans wooping repetitive requests at live shows. It’s possible that some listeners will prefer the dissonant one-two opening (like In Rainbows, always an odd hit-the-ground-running-then-come-down tactic) or the aforementioned stretch of bare-bone acoustic ditties, that they’ll see the droney, multilayered expanses of “In Caroline” and “White Lace” as peaks or valleys of interest (ok, I might ally myself a touch with the former there) but in a weird way, possibly just a product of immersion, the twists and turns seem premeditated such that every song, sans the wry leap of faith off the bat, feels earned by the ones before it. That’s why it’s exciting to find out only at “Patagonian Domes” that McMahon can write a totally blissful and grooving roadtrip song, to find out only at the last track how many different directions he can take his voice simultaneously. He’s impossible to pigeonhole – no matter how much great stuff he’s clearly informed by – but by the end of the album he’s somehow convinced you that he’s a unit. Albeit, I continue to switch hands, a unit with more to say than he already has with this great album. 8.5

And You Will Know Us By the Trail of Dead - Worlds Apart (Interscope, 2005)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

There was a time when I was willing to nurse this as standing up, in terms of just songwriting, to its predecessor of bloated acclaim. But you can’t help that aesthetic gestalt, the way you sort through CD’s or mp3’s and for better or worse Source Tags & Codes feels (before I even listen) like a guitar wash while, for this album, all I can think about is the aggravating elements, that mildly grating voice, the song-lengths-for-their-own-sake, (the band-name-length for its own sake), the fucking portent. It’s when they started to blend, for me, into another scene entirely, to which they might not even have the prowess to belong. I need to dig through their early stuff, when they were decidedly part of the emo-before-people-automatically-hated-it scene of the mid nineties. This album, meanwhile, is a reluctant yawn like freshman Physics class, and moreover, a symbol of something like an album per year which I’ve incessantly avoided since.

Ah! To suddenly remember the sketched-out review I was preparing back when I first heard it: as soon as these guys became about the theme, I remember thinking, they were muddled and confused in terms of scale. Meaning, the sound of women crying that you could hear on a radio report after the tsunami segueing into undeniably white teenage angst. It’s a statement, it’s an irony, but it’s also totally unrelatable: anyone who thinks the whole world should be dragged into their personal pain, and can utilize sociological pain as a commodity, to make their point, ought to repel as many as it attracts. I’m thinking of what I said in Portishead about the use of African American spiritual cadences in the landscape of her head, of which I steered clear despite its Sylvia Plath compressive heartplow, but maybe it’s just too overt and hamfisted here for me to go for it. I’m almost thinking, if my 2005 self could have caught it, it must’ve been sluggish, yeah? Some of these relics don’t need to be revisited.

FTR: Source Tags & Codes (Interscope, 2002) 7.5

Animal Collective - Merriweather Post Pavillion (Domino, 2009) UPDATED

Here's to the longest review I've written -- it'd "devour the blog whole" as I say.

Animal Hospital - Memory (Barge, 2009)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Call it complete submission to random-mixtape theory, but whenever this accidentally comes on I become thankful that my favorite post-rock artists – Sigur Ros, Talk Talk, Slint – aren’t this post-rock. The big argument against this one has been they can’t decide which post-rock frame they want to dip into, so they dip into all of them. My response: I’d love that shit if they dipped into them at any sort of surprising intervals. I didn’t even live through post-rock, I raspberry’d at Lift Your Skinny Fists but was always fond of the premise, I chuckle at neurotic distinctions between “post” and “math.” Point is, I never had a chance to get sick of it, but this album makes me feel like I did anyways. Of course, if I want to believe it could have been done differently, I have to tweeze out the uninspired. Ө

Beak - Beak (Ivanda, 2009)

 

11.30.09  Bring back the jam! At least I have another month or so before I have to justify why Blues Control’s Local Flavor somehow hits me the right way, as more worthwhile than Geoff Barrow’s side project (referred, by the more accurate and tUnE-yArD-dOoMeD, as “BEAK>”). I toyed with double-reviewing the two, in the New Yorker tradition that’s sadly long since gone stale on the crutch of paragraph breaks and middle-school transition sentences, but in this case it might’ve hurt Local Flavor as much as it helps Beak. I’m willing to call it context, Blues Control sprung on me via CD-R in the car and Beak far less out of the blue, complete with ties to one of the decade’s best artists and an explicit admission of ephemera (strangely similar to Black Mold, you might notice, and had those ended up reviewed together it would surely have harmed Beak by association – you need Beth, you need songs and all that). But it’s not like I didn’t know Geoff was a Krautrock junkie after Third, but I did believe he was a perfectionist, so maybe Beak was recommended by his psychologist, to free up his ideas about music, make it communal and social again. No more locking away.


No surprise, then, that even though this stuff does always have the Kraut backbone, I hear a lot of Canterbury in there (just discovered Gong, the biggest hippies-in-a-ring relic of that time, but Soft Machine’s my main point of reference here). Part of it’s that there are those trapped-in-a-well vocals, hardly prominent and often sounding like they just kinda accidentally drifted through the heavy filter of one of the drum mikes or something, melodically just as dada as anything else. Then take those jazz-roulette fills on “Ham Green,” that witty dexterity that allows some musicians to create geo-something structures out of tiny flashes and hints. Was it Satie who popularized that? In any case, too often the creative energy seems a little more sluggish. “Pill”s chromatic organ jam, the twiddled oscillator in “Iron Action” remind me of the paradox of performance art: you get the same feeling of having actually heard something before when really it’s the extent to which you haven’t that gets to you – I mention the eye-rolling when someone drapes coathangers from all of their arms, or even Natalie Portman’s canonized little onomatopoeia in Garden State. Somehow always comes from a place of exclusion, conservatism, but it’s not like you can help that, right.


More than anything, the Portishead connection is misleading because this is not (excepting my first glimpse, “Barrow Gurney”) noisy, deafening, dark, hopeless stuff. Just the Krautrock foundation guarantees that in a way, a certain meditation. If you’re expecting horror grooves, as I was, the major-chord jam in “Backwell” will almost sound like it’s laughing at you. “Battery Point”s comfort with itself is its selling point – feels like it’s filling the role of the “beautiful part of the album,” like the power-ballad in modern rock. Sometimes in my own notes, I affix a little plus or minus sign to a rating or review just to indicate the direction I think it’s headed in my book, hope or doubt. In any case, this one has a nice uplifting plus, meaning I hope to revisit it once I’ve decided how much or why I like Local Flavor, because this stuff is weirdly Utopian. Geoff needed it to unwind from post-Third pressure, I bet, and I bet too there’ll come a time when I need it just as much as he did. 7.5

 

Black Mold – Snow Blindness Is Crystal Antz (Flemish Eye, 2009)


11.21.09  I just got done being pissed at a review of Electrelane’s first album that essentially started by criticizing instrumental music as an institution, a really me-in-high-school/Calum Marsh breach of John Updike’s basic rules of criticism, but all that aside, vocals are important. Look at it this way: Black Mold is the first Chad VanGaalen album that isn’t obsessed with death and the afterlife. Maybe that’s unfair when this album is such a communal move, but these sorta base distinctions do inform most people about where the content is. So if VanGaalen really is an analogue to the arc of Cokemachineglow – the sort of “we like it because it reminds us of ourselves” that they retrospectively pinpointed with Subtle – then it doesn’t bode so well for the current state of CMG. That, in other words, they are now a density of fragmented ideas with glimmers of brilliance but a complete lack of self-editing and, crucially, content. I don’t think that’s true of CMG, but if it were, it could easily survive the Internet glut, because people – myself included, too often – really don’t even read the way they used to when they’re looking at a screen. This probably does correspond, in an eerie way, to how people listen to music differently, ever hopscotching, ever sifting. VanGaalen fancies himself a DJ now, a sad misinterpretation of his fans’ excitement about the minute elements he injects into his songs. A sticker slapped on the cellophane informs me of over 100 other Black Mold tracks available for free download somewhere. There’s a morbid irony to the fact that this is one of only a handful of CDs I’ve purchased in the past year, because its too instantly prepared for its era, too buffered against the harsh winds of culture, too insistent that critics continue the not-so-noble tradition of laundry-listing the best tracks on an album. The downside to postmodernism: nothing is ever whole, not least when the tangible has melted away into digital simulacrum. I could give this the little scissors, but I cleave when an album really demands (pardon) cleavage, not by default. So the general problem, then, is that this album feels like behind-the-scenes documentary footage, I Am Trying to Break Your Heart style, the sort of thing that would be totally exciting if I already knew the album he was going to make out of all this. But electronic music, down to the lowliest trance, is almost inherently about tension and release, it’s about playing your cards in the right order. Snow Blindness is matte, it’s stew. It doesn’t matter that a lot of it is kinda interesting because VanGaalen is already on shuffle in anticipation of the listener being on shuffle. It doesn’t matter that some of it sounds like late-90s techno, the sort of real entry-level Songsmith fare that could only be exciting to a gifted-turned-zonked singer-songwriter, because it’s never administered with any precision. Take the track immediately following the misleading opener, Dr. Snouth. Even at barely over a minute it’s too long, because it just can’t get over its own Power-On-android fragment, because it’s unwisely (CMG would say philosophically, ironically) built around that fragment. The easy accusation of VanGaalen’s solo work is that he’s just dressing up his songs like a kid in a sandbox, and this album comes disarmingly close to verifying that. I consider myself forgiven, because after all, he writes beautiful, sad songs about death and the afterlife. Pardon that I don’t want to look at the mess after the spine’s been yanked out. Ө

 

Brand New – The Devil and God Are Raging Inside Me (Interscope, 2006) 

 

11.06.09  I’m host to more than one friend who – regretfully or defiantly – cast Brand New’s Deja Entendu as a major musico-emotional centerpiece of their high school days. The album’s immediately recognizable as emo (not to go all Rob Mitchum and wear out the label as a go-to set of conventions to be adjusted and defied; Jesse Lacey’s sub-Kanye rivalry with Taking Back Sunday frontman Adam Lazarra is enough to clump them in a “scene” in the worst way) but for all my inability to go much further than smiling-and-nodding with most of the stuff, I had to confess that Deja was the most fully realized member of the genre. “Member” is key: years ago I wrote a review (also on request) of an Early November side project and mentioned how comfortably Brand New accomplished anything emo ever wanted to in one fell swoop. By contrast, their followup The Devil and God Are Raging Inside Me (terrible title, terrible cover – no reason at all to have faith in it) might be the only album to which I can refer as “post-emo.” I know, I know – I have a real problem with teleological posts all over the place. Problem is, listeners do without even realizing it, which is to say, Brand New had nowhere else to go after Deja except deeper into self-deconstruction.


Since Deja thrived, though not exclusively, on bitter wordplay ricocheting within standard acoustic song structures, it’s worth mentioning that Devil and God really lays the emotions bare and becomes all about the sound. I was first and longest enchanted by the two-chord architecture of “Jesus,” a restraint I still liken to Pinback in a strange way, but whenever I revisit the album I find myself drawn to subtler touches like the singular, meaty punches at the end of “Sowing Season” long after you think the song has ended and the omnipresent machines start to slow. It really is a beautifully produced album: endless ethereal depth and space, moise with bodily fluids and their mythic interpretations, all of which – and here’s where I think “post” has to rear its ugly head – draw attention to the old tropes of emo that are left standing like Roman pillars. If I’m repelled by those power chords, by those throaty screams, both of which I’d be normally bent on calling automaton, it’s not just cultural or philosophic, it’s because they have all the dynamics of a horror flick. They get you to lean in close and then clock you. And yeah, sometimes it feels a little cheap, god damn it. It’s the sole reason I’ve only listened to the album a handful of times, despite my respect, a sort of synergy of dread and shame.


This doesn’t sound like it bodes well for the album, right, but to be sure, I can see exactly why those who cried over Deja’s major keys and then let themselves be lured into Devil and God might find it exactingly potent. The psyche-plumbing is such that the album’s an entity unto itself that leads the band and the listener to question everything in equal measure. “No matter what they say, I’m still the king” Jesse belts, which sounds like a crumbling allusion to his snarkier “it hurts to be this good” past. And when “Millstone” snaps into an old major-key chorus – “Take me out tonight, woo-ooa-oaah!” – you don’t believe his optimism any more than he believes himself. This is the best way for standard Brand New songs to fit into the mold of this album, for them to fragment a little – otherwise, “The Archers Bows Have Broken” [sic] shows, they actually disrupt the monster of the album itself. That’s why it’s completely forgivable that the songs, to say nothing of the lyrical motifs, seem to be repeating themselves (“Untitled,” “Handcuffs,” and especially “You Won’t Know” all evoke “Jesus” in their own ways). It’s bizarre, when the melodies seem to organically grow out of the album, the sense that they knew exactly what world the songs belonged to before writing them. Logistically, it’s bullshit: they can’t have written all the songs after knowing the space the album would occupy. That’s why things like the sloppy choir of “Degausser,” superficially styled after old songs like “Soco Amaretto Lime”s “you’re just jealous ‘cause we’re young and in love,” feel like they’re being wrung out, like they’re being attacked from all sides. I guess it’s alright that Daisy is an mp3 album, ready for the sieve – that, in other words, they let this one be instead of dangerously building on it or reproducing it. There probably can’t ever be an album genuinely like it again, though we folk who observe emo from afar can hope that there might be some other “post-emo” album someday – an album that can recontextualize everything that makes it emo and somehow become all the more emotional for it. 7.5


FTR: Deja Entendu (Triple Crown, 2003) 7.5; Daisy (Interscope, 2009)

The Bug - London Zoo (Ninja Tune, 2008)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Oh well, my intrigue about this album – partially a product of not reading closely enough – is an interesting phenomenon, even if it ends in a disappointing, smudged-out blech. Something told me it was going to be an incredibly dense noise-hop record, something about the cover, maybe the fact that The Wire was really into it and they stick to their guns about the avant-garde like no other. And to be sure, it’s well-produced for a Dub album, bearing in mind that standard Dub fare is to elongate every element through an echo whose delay is high as its decay is low, but I can’t help my gastric associations I suppose. I want to recommend it to someone who normally likes the stuff, and its acclaim is a testament to the no-holds-barred attitude towards criticism that’s overturning metal’s Sabbath-pelted history. Hell, I was actually rooting for (again, without having heard) the album as P4K’s number one, and even knowing what I do now that would be far, far more adventurous and compelling than the reality, but that’s for another discussion that has less to do with the music itself. Ө

Captain Beefheart and the Magic Band - Trout Mask Replica (Straight, 1969)

3.11.09  Give an album a listen and it might satisfy for a day, but teach a man to myth and he'll myth for a lifetime. Which is a veiled admission: I really haven't listened that closely to this, but I finally understand what's going on here, it's actually become an axis that I can refer back to, just like how I unabashedly support the idea of Twin Infinitives despite not listening all that much (it's madd difficult, after all). So don't ask me to ascribe a value to this axiomatic trait, even though I hamfistedly will if you check the bottom of the review. Anyone taking a side on it actually makes me roll my eyes these days ("it's pure trash, there's nothing there, like the emperor's new clothes"; "you have to actually LISTEN to it and give it TIME"; and my favorite, "guys, it's just ALRIGHT, neither a classic NOR terrible").

Point is, the story behind it (this might be accurate or not, but it's good enough for me, probably better) explains why it has this effect on people. Don Van Vliet sat down at a piano for most of these songs and banged out something practically off the top of his would-be brilliant head, which I'm prone to do occasionally. Someone recorded it and transcribed its notation extremely carefully, down to the erratic rhythmic patterns, and this was painstakingly memorized by the Magic Band, who played the different "keys" of the piano in unision. Clarinet, fiddle, stand up bass, trumpet, hihat all at once, with the ultimate effect of spontanaeity despite extreme technical precision. This creates the probably-unmatched sound of the record: no one who believes in this kind of free jazz tonality usually believes in notation and careful practice of the same part over and over. It boils down to Van Vliet (who, by the way, has an awesome enough name to have kept), and whether this one guy's improvisations are worth listening to. What throws us off, and disconcerts us, is that marching-band sound, as if they're going crazy of their own free will.

When I play my atonal guitar gibberish amongst friends, I'm largely irritating. I once actually let slip that I sometimes wish the more harmonically minded people there would make heads or tails of the stuff I was randomly playing but that, I'm convinced, still had musical merit. One friend of mine, a Jazz piano major, grabbed another extremely talented Jazz piano major for a duo concert for this exact purpose. He was into the abstract, clusters, total freeform, and this other guy happened to have a totally brilliant ear. I don't think it was planned this way, but my buddy dominated the concert, while some kind of interesting sense was rendered by the guy he enlisted. Call Captain Beefheart the absolute extreme of this: marionettes, a real Magic Band, perfectly under his command, perfectly strung to the impulses of his own mind. This is fascinating enough to me that I don't care that I don't listen to the album all the time, and there's a tiny element of that in a lot of music I review (I stop listening once I have something more abstract that I can sink my teeth into) but rarely do I, when listening, feel so viscerally divorced from the cerebral, mythical content. This is why whether it's "good" or not is forever a moot point, it depends on how you listen (if that's the right word) to all your music. For myself, as someone who writes about music by instinct, it's worth... um... can't think of a gerund. It's worth mentioning. 8

The Cars - The Cars (Elektra, 1978)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

I guess I take this album as emblematic of our need to consecrate museum pieces, the music critic a more of a cultural documentarian than evaluative listener. I can’t deny my love/hate for “You’re Just What I Needed,” which pretty much encapsulates a certain XC team’s party atmosphere – the closest thing to real “parties” that I ever enjoyed. So yeah, imported nostalgia for when New Wave was a triumphal unifier, but I’m so bothered that this kind of uniform mediocrity can outlast the inventive ones, your This Heats and Pere Ubus. I declare myself unimpressed, and have for awhile been using this album as the need to put the “era-defining” nature of music above all else, the depressing notion that, oh I don’t know, Mariah Carey will someday be seen on lists that ought to excavate instead of glance. ≠“You’re Just What I Needed”

Clinic - Do It (Domino, 2008)

 

(First Published in The Grape)

Clinic’s 2001 debut Internal Wrangler rendered the pejorative “style over substance” an anachronism, one of the only convincing incarnations of the head-scratching phrase “art-punk” this millennium’s had to offer. Songwriting didn’t matter nearly as much as the sheer aesthetic of the whole outfit. We needed a band that sounded like them more than we needed a new chord progression. It was the sound of energy being condensed and forced through small openings: wheezing melodicas, cholesterol-clogged basslines, Ade Blackburn’s vocals gathering spittle behind clamped teeth and a surgical mask (seriously), massive guitar and organ blasts wrung through cheap amps.

Thing is, Ade’s still wearing that surgical mask. Which is to say, Clinic stick to their fucking guns, and it’s long since been agreed that this could be a fatal flaw for them, overtaking any sense of immediacy in even their best work. That would be true, if their sound were any less thrilling, or any less theirs. Do It! is Clinic’s fifth album in eight years, and like many of their recent albums, you can taste the ambivalence right from the start: “Memories” interlocks a classic stomp with what sounds like Blackburn’s best croon (that is, an unconvincing one).

They’ve been trying semi-persistently – since “Distortions” broke everyone’s heart – to create something heartfelt and spacious, and have been steadily peppering their albums with more and more chimes, harps and jingle bells – instruments that are still idiosyncratic, but awkward more often than not. Closing track “Coda” exemplifies this awkwardness, a would-be lilting torrent of trademark instruments with a bored voice-over about the Bristol Charter. Suffice to say it doesn’t clinch the album too well. Other medium-rare subduers like “Free Not Free” and “Emotions” blend a little better, but the only time Clinic sound like they’re interested in being themselves is on “Mary and Eddie” a gentle ballad that gets a spine-tingling foghorn sloshed over the first chorus. It’s the kind of small surprise many of us don’t expect anymore from these guys.

And ultimately, that’s what makes Do It! worth doing: the moments when they’re economical with their choices. The exception is “Tomorrow,” a fierce, steel-plucked jig that sustains a sort of tense festivity for its duration. The song works because it’s constructed around its unusual mood, rather than lazily letting the instrumentation drag in the exhausted “Sister Ray” and Modern Lovers associations. But, I mean, “exhausted” is relative: there’s still a certain glee to the fuzzed-out paint-by-numbers pogo sticks that fill the cracks of most of their albums. Clinic knew they had a good thing as well as their listeners did, and even more than most high-profile indie bands, they noticeably can’t decide if stopping and thinking about it will help at all.

FTR:  Internal Wrangler (2001) 9; Winchester Cathedral (2004) 7.5

Cluster - Zuckerzeit (Brain, 1974)

1.9.09  The terrifying thing about getting into Krautrock for me is that I'll become one of those almost mindless music listeners stuck on the same note for the rest of eternity, or that I'll submit to the laziest automatic sequencers to attain the randomized harmonic complexity I need. Kraftwerk makes a convincing case, at least, for this: we are all cyborgs, accept computers as appendages, but certainly don't be afraid. Worst that can happen is a world where everyone does the robot perfectly. I was afraid that mythology would be the only thing separating Cluster – the "true" inventers of sequenced electronic music, Eno's biggest influence for Another Green World, blah blah blah – from your run of the mill basement nosepicker racking up 9.1's from the people who think albums that can be made in one night are worth it. Maybe I was on, but also maybe mythology can totally take over for me, because every move played on Zuckerzeit felt like a chess game against time and culture – almost tongue-in-cheek in its audacity (the final track, "Heiße Lippen," cuts off almost the instant the album's first indistinct vocals come in). With one listen, I can't make any judgments for sure, but the song's identities seemed to be in place as one might expect on a so-called "classic," and of course I got chills whenever I heard that amazing yuppie bossanova drone that I tended to think only Eno could ever manage. No wonder they ended up working together! In short, more listens necessary: I don't think this is a "me first" game, but you might say they weren't sloughing off the subtleties back before sequencing was so prevalent as to worm into the work of a group that once named themselves "animal." 8

Ned Collette – Jokes and Trials (Dot Dash, 2006)

11.29.09 Was about forty seconds into “Come Clean” from his new album with Wirewalker that I started to feel nostalgic for a Ned Collette that I hardly knew. I’ve lived with “The Laughter Across the Street” for three years, and it’s picking me up now. And yeah, “Come Clean” is laden with RIYL baggage, more a Krautrock-Spoon capillary than anything single unto itself. I couldn’t believe it was the same guy who seemed too young to dip into those “Walk on the Wild Side” smooth gospel vox in “Laughter”s outro, more reminiscent of late Leonard Cohen than Songs. But that’s the thing: if we actually believe that the best of the “standard songwriter” template – Dylan, Drake, um, Donovan – actually speak adequately for themselves, we’d stop incessantly comparing new songwriters to them. Meaning there’s always less of an RIYL with these guys, the sonic tethers of the critical community just don’t gut you the same way. I’ll always be guilty for believing, and even suggesting aloud, that Ned Collette’s format of swirling acoustic figures and tufty words recalls early Cohen, but he has his own story to tell. Which may explain how the tiniest touches, the Jew’s Harp in “Boulder,” the slide guitar in “A Plea From You to Me,” that aforementioned outro iced with the most effective phasing squelch since “Sleep the Clock Around”, all these contradictions stay ensnared in a world of dangling phraseology.

Maybe that’s what makes “Laughter Across the Street” remain the album’s centerpiece, the fact that he lets his words pile on top of each other just enough to create an epiphany without toppling the structure. “The laughter across the street is picking me up now and making me think that life beyond your shadow can exist / How do people do it, though? I guess they drop the bat and run and don’t look back until the pain has disappeared into the mist.” These wind through the nylon overtones, and listening you think his point and maybe sentence is complete long before it is, that the rest is that trail-off-to-a-mumble-when-other-people-interrupt neurosis we’ve actually somehow become painfully acquainted with in culture. “Mist” is the lowest note of the phrase, its foam-board landing doesn’t lock into the same metric space occupied by the perched “exist,” so it scarcely functions as a traditional rhyme, more of a distant evocation. But the end of the phrase still feels like a mystery, and there’s no release in the word “mist,” it almost sounds like it stopped mattering before then. That’s Ned Collette: the Antipunchline, examining the rise and fall of inspiration without mercy. Later: “Laughter across the street is the only thing that comes in this life without hitches,” even as the smooth curtain-closing vibe of his words keep getting “hitched” on… what? Grammar? “Blame” takes a different magnifying glass to this by effectively circling continually back through the sort of melody that might signal a key shift in another song. It’s like a looped video of a plastic bag in a parking lot (American Beauty inspiration duly acknowledged) – always familiar, from the start, but never, somehow, perfectly predictable. The contours just don’t unfold. Repetition is a form of change and all that.

But the song cracks apart under Collette’s sudden earnestness, the sort of eruption that makes you question his cloudy wordplay just about everywhere else. “And I want to blame you,” is simple, direct, and loud, as if he’s drowning out that eerie pattern, and curiously enough, the album ends on a juvenile “la la la” outro which sounds, in both basic tune and unstable pitch, like he’s slapped his hands over his ears and tried in the middle of a panic attack to reproduce the smooth wordless clinch of “Laughter.” Again, when he’s earnest and loud, the rest of the album seems pretty, but meditative, harmless, which is why “Heaven’s the Key” is just absolutely the most wrenching thing here – paradoxically pegged by dead-eyed scrollers as the most imported RIYL-y piece. Well, yeah, it’s droney as hell, which is probably part of the reason I like it, but Ian Curtis? Gave Joy Division a listen the other day just to double check, and no, Ian Curtis still doesn’t sound like every baritone of the past ten years. Furthermore, “Heaven’s the Key” earns its numb observations by constantly taking flight from them, every time hitting the same molten doo-wop ceiling: “I don’t know how I feel.” And he returns to what he knows, he returns to the facts for the final line of each stanza. Somehow the sparse lyrics beget the greatest emotional swathes on the album: “We will walk by the lake/Do we make a mistake?”; “Petrol leaking from mines/It’s just one of those times.” And always, always, “I don’t know how I feel” conveys the most about how he feels.

The songwriting is strong throughout, but production seem to shift, generally, from Dad-rock territory to greater sonic inventiveness (my bias, correction: the touches are more visceral than cultural) in the second half – say, a song like “Don’t Talk,” built on what seems to be a scintillating EKG, would’ve been unheard of in the first half of the album. It feels weird to say this about an album that I’ve pretty much binged on for about a week, but there’s definitely something cumulative about Ned Collette, it’s just pleasant to find out how he fleshes his world out from the skeletal foundation “Song for Louis.” This is why I absolutely had to stop listening to “Come Clean.” It’s nothing intrinsic, I just was wearing blogger goggles and I knew that the people who would be most thrilled by it would be prepared by his slow ascent, they’d know that Ned Collette doesn’t know how he feels, his confidence would be a huzzah not a bore. I don’t know what it is about “standard songwriters” that makes them, for me, best obsessed over one line at a time, why Dylan’s “You try so hard but you just don’t understand” snicker actually subsumes his drawl, his meme. So much for ’09, but I need to take my time with Ned. 8.5

Congos –Heart of the Congos (Black Art, 1977)

10.13.09  The pulse of reggae and dub has throbbed like a headache throughout this past summer for me, so it’s with some relief that I can declare a reggae album – from the heart of the movement, no less! – that I not only appreciate, but also consider pretty under-appreciated in all sects. Pinpointing exactly what it is about the album that grabs me is a little tougher. Probably comes down to its anachronism, as usual; that Os Mutantes vibe of a depth of sound that seems influenced by “freak folk” (I don’t know what to call Sung Tongs any more) even though it precedes the movement by decades. The paradox of improvised jubilance and meticulous attention to detail, especially in vocals. Being no reggae aficionado, my touchstones are pretty meager. The falsetto sighs evoke Damon Albarn, probably only because my first exposure to dub was the throwaway Gorillaz remix album Laika Come Home. All else evokes a Marley less interested in ego than the delicate balance of fiery words and uplifting chords. The most chilling example probably being the prolonged Genesis reference “Sodom and Gomorrow,” six minutes of “Sodom and Gomorrow were destroyed by fire/ It keep on Burning / Burning / Burning.” The idea that these are sung as a gleeful paean comes off conceptually as, what, demonic? But that’s the grace of this group, that the more you hear that word the more convinced you are that Biblical metaphors course through us in antiparallels, and that this 30-year-old album captured the Rapture in Technicolor. Those vocals are too weightless to burn, and the group gives us vantage from on high to see the eschatology that, arguably, never really came. 7.5

Dadamah - This Is Not a Dream (Majora, 1992)

1.4.08  I'm thrilled to know that there are still bands like this that exist, waiting to be discovered – in this case they emerged while I was listlessly investigating the bands most frequently tagged as "drone pop" on last.fm – and if my roommate's obsession is any indication, there's a density of sorts in New Zealand. Roy Montgomery is apparently so prolific that he's hard to keep track of, so I'm glad to be taking it slow here, but what I really like about this album is how the band takes certain assumptions that most musicians (and listeners) wouldn't have to the nth degree and forces them to coexist. A bit like a less measured and extreme TV on the Radio, who I always said worked for slapping together an instinctual impulse to soul and R&B with that electro-shoegaze washwall. With Dadamah, on the other hand, it's totally apparent how they work as a band, with tolerance and probably respect for one another, but don't take that to mean that their contributions are with respect to one another. The organs simply are; they take off when the impulse strikes, with sloppy spidery glee ("Papa Doc"), Roy loves letting guitar overtones get tangled in emptiness, but should have left vocal duties (his a worn Ian Curtis pump) to Kim Pieters, who's so undermixed at times that she sounds like she's crying for help under the noise, yet at the same time when she rises up she inflects her belt with so many empowering tropes that the drone is just backdrop to some ominous congealing Gothic narrative, too personalized to be a nightmare. Her instincts (if not an appropriate term here then never) are on par with Cocteau Twins' Elizabeth Fraser at her darkest – or, I don't know, Jane Siberry? This music is a stew; cheaply produced but I wouldn't have it any other way, shoegaze never got a chance to jab a coffin, to fight anything, it was up in the clouds practically from the getgo. 8.5

Dandy Warhols - Earth to the Dandy Warhols (Beat the World, 2008)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Look… shit. I didn’t want them to come up like this. I’d rather do a column called “in defense of Dandies” because I kinda liked Odditorium, handful of missteps as it had. I wanted to say that Dig! did them in, and no one wanted to think of them as anything more than a groove-churning corporate machine anymore, but this album really does suck. It culls the poor taste of a few of Odditorium’s weaker tracks and the endless soullessness of Monkey House which left me totally cold, and none of that amazing (sure, autopilot) drone that anchored Thirteen Tales From Urban Bohemia in bliss. I don’t remember specific moments, and neither does the band. Nihilism can be a basis for art, and it has been at the Dandies most successful, the sort of nihilism I can chew on as easily as Faust’s maligned IV opener “Krautrock.” Here, the Dandies want more than anything to be a cog, and I grimace-smile that the cog ends up grinding the critical and popular and even hipster apparatus more than anything else. I’ll get to their self-conscious quadruple-irony hipsterdom shtick of yore later on. ●

FTR: Thirteen Tales From Urban Bohemia (Capitol, 2000) 8; Welcome to the Monkey House (Capitol, 2003) Ө; Odditorium of Warlords of Mars (Capitol, 2005) 7.5

Dan Deacon – Bromst (Carpark, 2009)

11.03.09  For some reason I got really excited to hear this when I found out how much better everyone thought it was than his other stuff. Now I’m savvy enough to know that about a third of the time that just means it sounds like MPP. To me, Dan Deacon entering that realm from the electronic wormhole only validates the more-complete-review-yet-to-come that we aren’t even aware of how techno beats and even techno song construction inform music we might never call techno. This is anxious, anxious stuff, something other people don’t smell probably because of the guise of populism – first time I really saw him was in the Baltimore Round Robin, a compressed study in terror and judgment to begin with, and his music locked into that vibe perfectly. He’s certainly talented live, but he relies on a certain immediacy, which in album terms amounts to goldfish memory. Meaning it’s got its quips, but when over half the album’s 6-9 minute tracks I end up with a would-be-DJ envy that I don’t get access to every layer separately. But I’m not surprised it’s well-received. Fuck the doodles, his early stuff at least had a bit of a niche, a grating sense of humor at worst, an awesome contemporary lens on Bruce Haack’s proto-electronic goofcore at best. I couldn’t listen to it forever, but what terrifies me about the new one is that I feel like I’ve already been listening to it forever. Ө

11.30.09  Christ! OK, fine, I don't want to like it because of the MPP association I made, which was exactly my problem with Grizzly Bear. I've twisted free: he's irritating but he knows how to make a strong record. >> 7.5

Delgados – Hate (Mantra, 2002)

12.10.09  Someday this will all be nostalgia. I observe this so readily that I need to not have any problem accepting this. “Long after the thrill” and whatnot. I’m also coming to grips with the fact that there is a science to saving young lives, splayed as my idealism of artistry was, and that the precision of that science can in itself be beautiful, can even evoke something like a wistful aesthetic response. All will be nostalgia. So if I want to puff myself up to an entity, post-threshold, I’d decree that I might have either of two responses to willfully “teenage” music: these artists are too old to have these concerns, or they’re doing a sort of community service. They’re in the business of saving young lives. Why this comes to a head with Delgados is another question – I think it’s probably because it sounds so 1997 (peaking drum-marches, strings threaded throughin, in-key twinkles, sighing choruses, “Bittersweet Symphony,” etc. etc. etc.) that it’s just gotta be a sort of exercise in preemptive nostalgia for the members too. “When things that once were beautiful are bland,” they conveniently quote separately in the liner notes like a fucking waiting-room column, baiting me, just daring me to turn on my past. What can I say, I didn’t grow up with this, but there’s such craft here that I can see why it got what from a certain angle looks like “critical acclaim” Erin and Kyle told me that the worst thing about writing music reviews professionally was having to muster enthusiasm for something that you didn’t particularly care about. And for all my promo-bin talk, I never saw it that way, as a kind of duty to the consumer, a duty to the version of myself it might save. So I’m egging their breaks and flourishes the way I picture I’ll applaud a good 10th grade Macbeth paper, the way I’ll nod at Meno-style stumbles over age-old binaries, and maybe I’ll toss someone a copy of this album just because I know it adheres. I’m not throwing up my hands yet, but someday it will all be nostalgia, and when I purge my inner curmudgeon it can be fucking delightful to actually be so far from being swept away. 7.5

Dinowalrus - % (Kanine, 2010

 

3.31.10  Tiny Mix Tapes review. 8.5

 

The Dirty Projectors – New Attitude EP (Marriage, 2006) 

 

10.25.09  Not to say I’m not thrilled to hear a few bloops here and there, which I’ve awaited since hearing The Getty Address marketed as a “glitch opera,” but especially in such a short unit this release falls prey to incoherence. It feels exactly like a handful of B-sides, right down to Glad Fact repreises with a low string droning in the background – realized, you could say, after the fact. Even Haley Dekle’s debut as female-Longstreth-counterpart isn’t as monumental as it sounds on paper, muddled and buried as it is. There’s got to be a contract with a band that has so many conflicting artistic impulses: go with it continually “Oh Comely”-style (The Glad Fact), nail it together with a concept (Rise Above) or sculpt it (Bitte Orca); I needed that minute survey to justify this being my first post about a group that I actually love a good bit. But without a contract, we get a little pile of shreds, historian’s curiosities to allot in their own iTunes chronology as necessary.

FTR: The Glad Fact (Western Vinyl, 2003) 8.5; Rise Above (Dead Oceans, 2007) 8; Bitte Orca (Domino, 2009) 8 

Drive-By Truckers - Brighter Than Creation's Dark (New West, 2008)

 

5.01.08  I think it was when I described both the Dandy's "Bohemian Like You" riff and Bowie’s “Rebel Rebel” as "Stonesy" on the same day that I realized I like the Stones best when I'm not actually listening to them. It's a backhanded adage, but I do think they're madd overrated – not album-centric enough for me, expect maybe Exile – but it follows that their influence demonstrates itself best in song-length fragments. Case in point, Drive-By Trucker's "3 Dimes Down" is becoming one of my '08 anthems partially because it's so out of place on Brighter. "Come back baby, rock and roll never forgets" sings Cooley, and fuck cliche-begging, I believe him.


Most of the album uses good ol' slide guitars... tones that move like gases, slowly rising, tones that demonstrate space by filling it – I mean, this is why we either think of a vast southern expanse under a starry night or actually drift off into the starry night itself (Pink Floyd) when we hear them. There's a lot of space on this album, and if reaction to A Blessing and a Curse was any indicator, people don't want these guys tightening up. I prefer these places where the album dips into double-album tropes as much as southern ones: it's nice that something so uselessly pigeonholed as Lynyrd Skynyrd-aping (fuck "Free Bird" and call it love if necessary, but they are not a great band – I'm inclined to recall Scott Plagenhoef's lubricant/balm binary – I have no doubt the DBTs trancend their accomplishments as much as they draw upon them) can show we ignorant northerners that there's some variation and quality left in the shackles of country. Shonna Tucker, therefore, is of no use to me as a vocalist; she feels imported, like any other element of variety, but it makes all the reasons I originally thought I'd find this disaffecting feel soggy.


Not that I needed convincing, given my recent foray into Califone in particular. I think I need it to be dirty, though; call it me rebelling against soapy skin with a blunt stereotype, or mythologizing southern lifestyle to avoid less flattering stereotypes, but "The Man I Shot" is great for filling the space with something thick rather than something thin. A little more along the lines of some Califone-predecessing Red Red Meat stuff (at least their first album), where we're physically blinded by blood and neurologically blinded by adrenaline and other chemicals, and everything starts to break down, the elements that seemed nostalgia-inducing get a nasty, scabby halo around them.


Unlike "3 Dimes Down" it really works in the context of the album, as a centerpiece, because it's angrily taking a pair of pliers to anything we might have settled into, and we're left to try and settle into a grotesque version of life thereafter – songs are instilled with more bitterness, more of that damp hangover inertia, happyness and momentum as a concerted effort to return to living. It's at least implicit in most cases, but "You and Your Crystal Meth" couldn't belong in the first half of such an opus – if you've gotten that far there's plenty of reason to lose hope the way that song does, where every piece of vision, every sound and every word pounds with the reverb of a heartbeat, where the guitars screech like voices or ringing in the ears. Ө

Elephant Micah and the Loud Guitars (Time-Lag, 2004)

4.29.09 Oh wait, pretend you haven't read the Red House Painters review yet, and then proceed to copy and paste, cause this takes the same cake with better icing: Elephant Micah's the best band that basically no one has heard about I can think of at the time. These are circumstantial apparitions: Hotel Alexis wouldn't have blessed my ears without the brief slosh of largely-skimmed promos when I pretended to write for LostAtSea (WHY didn't I review it when I still had access? Because bloody Uncut was first in line?). But this really ought to be the function of a scattershot blog like this: I'm always thrilled to see blogs that are out to expose those that no one might notice otherwise. I'm inclined to cast my votes on standards so you know you can trust me, see what I really wet myself over, but this is the sort of review that matters – largely because I'm pretty much wetting myself over it anyway. So, style, etc.? Call it the key of honesty. The circumstance of this apparition fits within Six Degrees: college-friend-of-older-brother-of-current-roommate. Maybe that's why I get such a nice proximal twentysomething resonance from Joe O'Connell's voice, muffled around the edges with lo-fi-filtration. Maybe it's hearing the right highlights first: the centerpiece, song-of-"my"-year (a list I ought to be making annually) epic "Nobody Knows, Rosie," or the D.Jr. fuzz-rock of "People Behind You"? If folkish delicacy is O'Connell's vice (see last year's Exiled Magicians), it's also where he can really tear me up (leave the homonym; I like it). Apparently the trio of "and the..." albums were culled from the same explosive sessions, which along with the title makes me wonder about Orphans style click-drag divvy, but nevertheless this album flows, it's got something other than loud guitars coursing through it. I'm not tooting my own horn as usual here: this is a bona fide recommendation. If you can somehow get your hands on this (I've moved on to Google Blogs as the deepest wellspring thus far, I also recommend that) you might, like I did, find a shrard of yourself that the mechanisms of day-to-day life, suddenly, seem to have concealed for as long as you can remember. Loving/hating the second person generalized anecdote; just loving Elephant Micah. 8.5

FTR: Exiled Magicians (Third Uncle, 2008) Ө

Felix – You Are the One I Pick (Kranky, 2009) 

 

11.30.09  Don’t so much have time for this. Which isn’t to say that I’m not unemployed, with plenty of free time (check this massive November update! …eh?? …eh?! Am I right!?) but, I mean, why “drone” would be batted around in regards to this record other than in reference to monochromatic songwriting is beyond me, to say nothing of the whole “unclassifiable” spiel. The first being symptomatic of research bloat (Stars of the Lid side project, already a group that, at least on ATROTD, confounds our former ideas of drone and post-rock and whatnot with an overtly Modern-Classical-whatever-the-fuck-that-means nod), the second being symptomatic of, what, sheer laziness? Boredom with the RIYL palate? (Something of a recent obsession of mine, you might notice). A desperate cry for constructive help? I mean, I don’t have time for this, even if in an almost Beckett fashion the sheer negative space of this album creates a stark contrast of contextual neuroses. I think it’s that neurosis that drew me in, and of course I can respond in turn with an equally itchy review, but don’t think the music correlates. It’s a nice album – I’m on the verge of actually going out of my way to recommend it to everyone I know who likes Regina and The Greatest, just to make something of it – but, and I’m being nothing if not the fucking zeitgeist itself here, I don’t have time for it. Sry. Ө

Fiery Furnaces - Gallowsbird's Bark (Rough Trade, 2003)

2.27.09  It's easy to get all nostalgic and bitter about the fact that this sort of debut gets swept under the rug by "the community" at large when you were there, man. But Christ, this album's ever the more blistering and consistent since they've galloped full-speed down the asymptote of playdough prog they currently monopolize. Bitter Tea pulled it off, if only for circumstance, but I could not be less interested in giving Widow City another try. They're mucking about in their own contradictions now, fancy themselves a Magic Band, and getting splashed by a group I used to consider saviors (I won't overstate it: Blueberry Boat made me believe progressive music could work again, a spectacularly postmodern opus where electronics climbed the rungs of the fretboard and I scratched my head on how they wove a whistle-for-sailing trope I didn't know existed straight into their narratives), well, it makes me frustratedly return to the souce as gospel.

To say this Gallowsbird's Bark is bursting at the seams with ideas really gives new life to the figure of speech. You can feel the minute elasticity of the seams here, the way Matt wedges dissonance into the cracks between chords on "We Got Back the Plague," but getting reeled back into its plod. For some people, Blues is like gravity; I jam with one friend and he hops through various ideas but is ever falling down into that nasty twelve-bar core. This is why their siblings-cranking-blues gimmick evoked the White Stripes on release, an anachronistic snippet of gossipy hype that's probably been forgotten by most people. Someone said they were more Stones than themselves on this album, and the area-mic'd "Two Fat Feet" sure stands out as such (I remind myself, Stonsey is always better than Stones for me) but check the piano sprinkle flecked so incessently on the chords; it's nice to be able to pay attention to their touches without them scampering off to something new. This is what makes debuts qualitatively different, right? Self-esteem springs eternal.

But there's plenty of different ways to look at how limitation worked for these guys. They limited themselves to instruments people would recognize and nod approval at – I remember that barely-hear-it awe when a friend put it on at a party and I heard that tumbling piano scale opening the album – instruments always separate from each other. The only prominent synths they indulge in are these great elbow-on-the-keyboard drones like "Leaky Tunnel" and "Don't Dance Her Down" which they never really returned to since. But length is a big issue too; even though Blueberry Boat is probably still the better album, it's got the halo of the wtf last 25 minutes because they probably needed it to be seen as an opus. Gallowsbird's clocks in at 47, only two songs more than 4 minutes, and unusual not only for them but for any band the album actually gets better as it goes. I always forget about "Rub-Alcohol Blues," an amazing segue between the less-regarded-than-single-version "Tropical Ice-Land" and aforementioned anti-Bush all-time-fave closer "We Got Back the Plague." But in "Rub" we get two minutes of stillness: "With nothing but old ragged clothes my heart strings broke to shreds/ Blues creeping over my body, queer notions flying in my head/ The easiest thing I ever done was loving and drinking wine." In the the piano/controlled-feedback pair eventually lifts off leaving a goregous arpeggio and a music-box-keyboard for only a few seconds. With most of the album behind the outro is the sort of thing you cherish as soon as it disappears. When the album's done I look at how preemptively frantic I need to be to cherish moments in their newest material, and how surprising it is every time when Gallowsbird's Bark earns it. 8.5

FTR: Blueberry Boat (Rough Trade, 2004) 9; EP (Rough Trade, 2005) 8; Rehearsing My Choir (Rough Trade, 2005) ↕ ; Matthew Friedberger - Winter Women/Holy Ghost Language School (859, 2006) Ө; Bitter Tea (Fat Possum, 2006) 8; Widow City (Thrill Jockey, 2007) Ө; Remember (Thrill Jockey, 2008)

The Flaming LipsEmbryonic (Warner Bros, 2009)  

 

10.24.09  I’m pretty surprised by the strong positive response to this album, but I’m about as surprised as I would have been to a strong negative response. Wasn’t sure, when I first heard it, which I’d need the vocabulary to challenge. It think it’s a classic case of exactly the sort of cultural injection I was talking about in “Numbness and Numbers” – the first 9.0 plopped on Embryonic literally instilled value to the smallest throwaway squiggles that really constitute the album. The Flaming Lips aren’t perfect by a long stretch, and occasionally even seem to be floundering with all the instantaneous choices and potential directions they can take a solo, a song, the album itself, and yet I firmly support Embryonic’s existence, its volition or lack thereof. It’s also an easy album to write about, from, right off the bat, the OK-Kraftwerk vocals of “Convinced of the Hex” to the Joy-Division-oh-wait-Native-American-when-he-says-“eagle”-ha-ha-what? of “Sagittarius Silver Announcement” – both categories of monotone, anything but the emphatic Coyne of yore – to say nothing of lyrical themes. (“People are evil,” he shrugs without a struggle on “If,” to give you an idea).


The question becomes, if we’re going to address the album as a statement, how well the Flaming Lips can manage pessimism, negativity, doom. Unsurprisingly, it’s a pessimism almost as campy as their paragonal optimism that practically drowned in Fridmann’s syrupy 2006 solo album At War With the Mystics. Speaking of whom, kudos on the what-seemed-impossible 180° production shift. This is noisy, and I don’t mean smoothable distortion, I’m talking about cluttered, hard-to-swallow Os Mutantes styled racket. It’s the studio equivalent of smashing guitars, compressed frustration, when their old reliable harp is abused into a force of chaos with constantly-peaking cymbals for the aptly named “Aquarius Sabotage” (I’ll avoid too close a reading of the astrological series, for pity’s sake). There’s more to say – the nice thing about this album is that there always will be, if you want it – even as you can just as easily write it all off as the story of a group sick of their niche with plenty of imported ideas about where they could go next. It adds up to a lot, even if it’s oddly static, appropriate for a double album even at only 70 minutes: a song repeating “Look at the trees/ they’re dying again” ad infinatum. At best, the album’s a new facet to a more complete band, like they’ve wanted to write songs like this for so long that an antiMystic exploded out of them. At no point does it feel like it needs to be progressive, which is why they’re almost more measured than Radiohead, incredibly. It’s more of an admission, an apology, but especially a density of the crummy and crumbly flotsam they’ve been skimming for the past decade. 7.5


11.22.09  A grower, though more as the philosophical monster gained a footing in my brain than through excessive repeat listens. I still have the same spiel when I’m talking to Flaming Lips fans about it – i.e. you probably won’t like it, you certainly didn’t expect it, etc. But Christ, listening to the statement of purpose “Evil” – this is some incredibly sad shit. The song is molten, a pop song’s throwaway ascending synth line slowed down so much (almost sounds like it has that slow-mo buzz, like Big Dog’s balancing act) that we can examine every facet of what drove the songwriting. This is what I was trying to say about “they’re dying again” – the emotions end up feeling relentlessly static to those of us that like to contort our emotions like balloon-animals as we try to observe them. “I wish I could go back/go back in time.” You figure, Wayne Coyne is so unflagging in his optimism on so many other albums, it makes sense that his doubt would be this sort of unending dry spell, on the edge of writer’s block. What the sentiment has to do with “evil” isn’t an argument that the song makes sequentially, or rationally; it just falls straight in. “I would have warned you/those people are evil/and it’s hard to understand…/I’ll never understand.” But in a weird way, the listener understands – the connections between these persistent, single-word themes: Evil isn’t inherent; Time creates it. The “plot” of the song, which we don’t even really have to fill in anymore, doesn’t really depend on anything more than that observation. “Never understand” is the only hope for escape that Wayne really has. This all goes to say something about how the album weaves in and out of the different facets of Evil, the different things that create it: retrospect, the ubiquitous “machine,” impulse, “only nature,” “believing in nothing” – like the broken mirror to the Lips’ bountiful inspiration, I repeat, a compilation of doubts. Maybe the scariest thing is, just by virtue of its self-negation, how fucking awesome that doubt it when it’s translated sonically. >> 8


FTR: Transmissions From the Satellite Heart (Warner Bros, 1993) 8; Zaireeka (Warner Bros, 1997) ; The Soft Bulletin (Warner Bros, 1999) 9; Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots (Warner Bros, 2002) 8.5; At War With the Mystics (Warner Bros, 2006)

 

Flying - Faces of the Night (Menlo Park, 2008)

<!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->
<!--[endif]-->

(First Published in The Grape)

My first experience with Flying involved finding a hand-watercolored gem in a bin of rough promos and three-track demos during an internship in 2006. So I’ll admit it up front: I have a little enthusiasm for the underdog in me, and that their debut later that year never really “broke out” stood as a testament to the arbitrary nature of the hype machine. Sara Magenheimer and Eliot Krimsky have the sort of honest-to-goodness people voices the elderly detest but we’re probably used to on some level. And their debut was recorded everywhere but the studio – you can hear the wind fogging up the mikes on most of the songs. So we’re talking madd DIY aesthetic.

Given this, and given their small degree of exposure, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense for Flying to bring on the swank for their follow up, Faces of the Night. But generally, this seems to be the direction, and the result is an even less predictable batch than what I consider a genre-hopping debut. Particularly, this album’s rhythm is oriented less around makeshift whirligig percussion and more on looped basslines. In fact, a hobbling octave alternation kicks off the record in “One-Eyed Son,” and is soon joined by shards of fractured guitar. The groove keeps the song afloat, even as Krimsky’s wavering words threaten to sink it. The cleverly placed second track, “A Cloud in Doubt,” is radically different from the sublunary opener: its wispy harmonies and careful keys suggest both the variety to come and their newfound use of the power outlet.

Many of the kooky elements from the first album are sanded down and employed sparingly here. Flutes, harmonicae, tambourines, cellos and acoustic guitar serve to flesh out and elongate rather than chop up the experience of songs, a particularly welcome tactic in “Fear of Flying” and the velveteen stunner “Poor Simone.” These songs may be particularly chilling as relief from the goofy and often confused moments – none so much so as the wah-wiggling “Stains” – but on a short (35 minute) album a little too much time is spent on the latter.

What surprises me more than the poorly modeled gloop, however, is how immediately affecting the ballads are. I tend to have a soft spot for witty production, and their debut’s bare-boners took awhile to get under my skin, so it feels weird to trust so quickly every word when Magenheimer sings “no pain is as great/ as this one” on “Draw It In The Dark.” They’re immensely talented melody writers with lots of ideas and, seemingly, lots of different expectations for themselves. As a consequence, they loosen their hold on as many elements as they tighten on Faces of the Night. But, more crucially, they’re keeping listeners on their toes, and it’s worth trusting them. 7.5


FTR: Just-One-Second-Ago-Broken-Eggshell (Mill Pond, 2006) 8

Dan Friel - Ghost Town (Important, 2008)

2.7.09  When you're dealing with practically instrumental music, the tiniest things can make all the difference – that ( ) had vocals at all, or that Hopelandic sounds like the sort of sad words we might picture him meaning ("you sigh along," whatever that means) – and so I don't feel like it's a whatever-the-fuck-difference-it-makes argument to talk about the song titles and their sequence on this terse album. After all: "Ghost Town Pt. 1"; "Desert Song"; "One Legged Cowboy"; "Appliances of Bremen" (actually don't ask me about that one); "Buzzards"; "Ghost Town Pt. 2"; "Singing Sand"; "Horse Heaven." Cute little expository arc, that. Because after all this is a wildly creative spin on what we might call "Spaghetti Western Music," enough to evoke those images, with the help of those titles, in the mind of anyone for whom the aesthetic isn't annoying. To my ears, it's almost too orgasmic to want to notice the songwriting variations; I'll probably make this argument in a billion forms on this blog, but it comes up time and time again: the best sounds are those that weren't influential but should have been. Listening to "Sister Ray" for realistically probably only the sixth or seventh time ever during an A.P. the other day I realized that organs so distorted as to crumble ("Singing Sand" is right) never really caught on despite the infinite scattered harmonic variety they offer. So that sound being the best part of Parts and Labor (it's why "Nowheres Nigh" is Moby if he could richochet so sprightly, a whole album of it is pretty damn successful if only for its complete freshness. It's almost the music equivalent of a think piece, a neat little what-if in the same way Return to Cookie Mountain was, but there are only so many places you can go with it. All roads lead to Ghost Town. 8

FTR: [see PARTS & LABOR AT THE SCO]

Handsome Furs – Face Control (Sub Pop, 2009)

 

12.21.09  Sometimes it seems like the talents of Krug and Boeckner were such that they could really only have exactly 15 minutes of fame, give or take a nice “omg” moment when they struck out on their own. Like any winning duo, the expansive force feels a lot mightier when “released” than the constrictive force, and I have the sort of no-duh appreciation for Sunset Rubdown that I have for Lennon’s solo stuff, but their frequencies were always tuned to the poles of indie fandom, the warbly intellectual (Krug) and the hoarse populist (Boeckner). That’s why Apologies was such a compelling swathe: it stabilized, even codified, all of the various elements of what people loved about this stuff. A lot of people didn’t even know there were two singers; the common social response was, “this sounds like Modest Mouse”; Krug would never pound just two alternating chords on his keyboard again; Boeckner’s “waiting for something that will never arrive” was a self-fulfilling prophecy as his own soapbox receded into the past. They scraped it all together into a muddy, drawn-out aesthetic that really only Built to Spill have been able to conquer for their second album, but when I saw them live the differences between them artistically were clear. Krug’s churning fever-dreams felt like the audience was actually inside his skull with all the psychedelic colors sucked away, and Boeckner was on the stage addressing us. Krug sang in singular pronouns (“I”/”you”), Boeckner plurals (“we”/”they”). The unique whole they’d combined to make this time was far from pretty, albeit a statement in its own way.

 

But Boeckner’s voice is drab, drab, drab, worn and unsightly like the clothes you’d choose to paint in, even when (or possibly because) it’s so much more excitable than Krug’s. It never feels theatrical, so the listener is infinitely more connected to his day-to-day experience of being in a band, working with that corner-crawling genius. Liking Plague Park, which came out the same year as Random Spirit Lover, was more a form of self-description, musical philosophy, than a product of the album itself. Does the world, in other words, need more solid indie pop records? Or should it plunder the consciousness and harmonic crags in equal measure? For anyone who like Apologies, the answer is neither, but Handsome Furs are running with the support they have, into what looks like willful irrelevancy. Face Control, for a few reasons, could never be as perfectly fun as its premise suggests. The main one is that Boeckner’s scooped out a place for himself as prototypical disillusioned post-slacker pop musician, which is really as far back as his listeners’ nostalgia can follow him. Ultimately the album can’t help but sound like a pretty fun party where a few ramshackle garage musicians rocked out to their shared love of New Order – a combination that ends up being weird enough – the voice, remember, amelodic and persistent – to turn some heads in a “wtf who is this” sort of way (like, I’m close to scissoring a standard choice like “All We Want, Baby, Is Everything,” just to pelt someone with its weirdness), but just obviously doesn’t have the heft to support a full record. Like, not to hold them up to New Order’s standards, but the bland keyboards are certainly never economical and “Everything” thinks about New Order songs that already exist more than what the song at hand actually wants. Problem is, the songs at hand scarcely want anything at all, which is probably why they’re just categorically difficult to deliberately return to. Ө

 

Here We Go Magic – Here We Go Magic (Western Vinyl, 2009) 

 

11.22.09  First things first: “Tunnelvision” is conspicuously good, especially paired with its music video (even as I’m thinking: in this age we can read into the tiniest snippets of footage kneaded together, we only request that it be too blurry or zoomed in to tell what ‘s going on most of the time, so we can feel a rush noticing that the fly on the windshield turns into an Eagle or whatnot), enough that it beckoned scissors, the closest thing to a song-length frame I have, the song sent me poring over 2009 again to see if I could, after Pogo’s “Alice,” scrape together eight other conspicuous standout songs. But then, “Tunnelvision” fits into the Spirals of White model anyway, being anything but about its beginning and end (“people live and then they die” has never sounded so continuous) and all of a sudden the whole album wound together for me. In a perfect world, every song on the album might have the same effect, having that horizontal, minimalist thread clotheslining Luke Temple’s absence of unified identity – Paul Simon on “Only Pieces,” Randy Newman on “Everything’s Big,” these being the laziest answers to an ever-elusive critical question – only it seems to me he doesn’t know just how much of a beating heart he instills those Sufjan droplets when he rises out of “I Just Want to See You Underwater,” the album’s nicest surprise. Otherwise it’d be harder to write off those ambient interludes as fodder. It’s just amazing how the parts with vocals, especially “Fangela,” are able to pull that trick of convincing you that they’re really songs. It’s only when they make it onto a radio show or a mixtape that their ambiance makes you wistful for the rest of the album. 7.5

Iran - Dissolver (Narnack, 2009)

2.23.09  Man, fuck you guys. I was gonna blow people's heads off with this obscurant hype-machine-malfunction relic from 2003 gone-pop, but I wasn't expecting you to go frat on me! Okay, Aaron's always sounded like a bit of a douche bag even when he was doing nonsensical lullaby noodles, so I guess he's almost in his element here. Cf. cokemachineglow's review, though the obnoxiousness weighs heavy; I was thinking about doing the "change scale per review" method just so I could give this two-and-a-half PBR cans. But Christ, what timing! Right when I was starting to think The Moon Boys is maybe a brilliant album bought too soon – it's not "noise pop" like any of us know it, closer to good ol' make-it-work through overlap/repetition Royal Trux – and right when I was starting to think words written in anger about a band no one's heard of aren't worth the breath to speak, the frigid juvenile onset arthritis to type. Make me a nihilist, why don't you, let my own words eat themselves. This is just so any reader knows I have a bar. Fuck you guys.

FTR: The Moon Boys (tUMULt, 2002) 8.5

Japandroids – Post-Nothing (Unfamiliar, 2009) 

11.03.09  I was all askew over this one and ready to call it album-of-the-year-by-default before I got more of a flux of quality and mind=changing at some point this past summer. A lazy toss that I dip into ad nauseum, probably because it’s language that others maybe actually can understand, is “emo used to be good.” Don’t test the depth of this comment, because it doesn’t hold much water. Fact is, when I listen to, say, the Wrens’ Secaucus, or even There’s Nothing Wrong With Love, I have a damn knotty time untangling the assets of the music from those tics that I know I shouldn’t like and historically haven’t in the Hidden in Plain view massacre of ’05. But it was, Christ, I don’t know, more earnest back in the 90’s? (Take a gander at the Sunny-Day-adorned 90’s list from 1999 and call it nostalgia by proxy.) At least a different look, closer to the Weezer school of hipster (back when hipsters were more earnest! – and the discussion is rightly disqualified) than the post-goth AP covers we now call “emo.” Suffice to say, like most things in their youth, emo started out undifferentiated from a lot of things – lo-fi, punk, power pop, fledgling indie rock before it ballooned grotesquely – and therefore more of a spontaneous act of creation than a commodity. I don’t know.

The already-circular and self-contradicting argument gets much gristlier, even as my devotion gets fiercer, when I find a spanking new group that manages to evoke the old school of emo, like they’re somehow in it for the right reasons and that comes out in the music. There are at least two concrete elements that I can hold onto, and repeatedly tell myself constitute a majority of the picture (up to a 7.5, at least) but neither of which I’ve actually observed in the Wrens or myriad others. The first is that the vocals, though classically anguished, cluttery-double-tracked and lyrically questionable (“so we can French kiss some French girls”?) are defiantly low in the mix, so that Brian King ends up sounding more like a fuzzy singer for a live basement-band. Can’t even hold the microphone correctly, right. And as a yang to the vocals’ ying, the guitars are huge, noisy and absolutely gorgeous, full of sustained SY-dissonances and blissful major-7 chords, so consistently flooding the songs that the album’s best moment is closer “I Quit Girls,” which alternates in a cycle between mutechopped tones and stretched epiphany, always seeming closer to completion with each revolution. And it breathes life into Pabsty bro-wisdom like “if you’re lucky/on the seventh day/she’ll wear nothing,” partly because the words sigh in and out of the entire song instead of going for punchline, but also because the words are always on the cusp of being totally lost under those guitars, like the guitars could speak the sentiment better than a human voice.

It’s easy to flop out a spongy binary to describe the tension in the music, but Japandroids are actually straddling a very difficult other line here: between the latent fear of “too emo” that can shut down creator and listener alike, and, on the other end, acknowledging and working within the decade-long post-Blink tidal wave. Post-nothing indeed: even the guitars never feel like an end in themselves, they always come off as subsidiary to their project of rocking out, more Siamese Dream than Loveless, more D.Jr than SY, what have you. (No surprise that “I Quit Girls” feels like a second cousin of “Mayonaise.”) That it hits so many pleasure centers in the end feels almost like an accident, albeit the sort of accident that only comes from true “post-nothing,” true blindness, true youth. Call me sociologist or weepy nostalgic that after a certain point, it doesn’t even matter who they are or what they’re singing about. 8.5

Lindstrøm - Where You Go I Go Too (Smalltown Supersound, 2008)

5.14.09  Fucking furniture music. I guess I'm relieved... see Cluster. It just feels like there's something amiss in the critical apparatus for electronic music, they're letting it become this asymptote. I practically decided I needed the blank-faced emoticon just for the sake of weeding out electronic music. I like the premise of the Buddha Machine because I can liken these guys to the fan that some people need to have on to sleep. Lemme see... I have Murcof, who Porcys really likes, their gimmick is the letter "M"... Squarepusher, who I guess I felt took Aphex Twin's spazz to a new height, but I might be wrong there... Prefuse 73 Oh Wait Maybe It Was Them I Was Thinking Of... Mokira, who Murcof's gimmick really curses... my eyes blur on the patterned lines of iTunes. I do declare! At some point someone I read or met convinced me these were all worth it. With this one I think it might've been the telltale mention of Krautrock, but much as Krautrock's in all electronic music nowadays, I don't really hear it. To discuss the music more readily, well, it's breezy, more like curtain music than furniture music, but I get the whiff of little cheezy 80s throwback elements rising in and out, synth with all its cheezy, sibilant evocations, flangers like Ween except here my irony abacus is too gelatinous to use. If it were M83, I'd feel like something were being presented to me, instead he starts off with a fucking 29 minute track that doesn't even believe in earning a timestamp. It doesn't have the backbone I need to assess it, it's an emblem of the way some people listen to music. Don't think I'd hold it against them, but don't think they'd ever read this many words about Lindstrom either. Ө

Loose Fur - Loose Fur (Drag City, 2003)

4.3.09  I liken this to Ugly Casanova's Sharpen Your Teeth, not only because I briefly and lazily referred to Califone as Yo La Wilco (Tim Rutili plays guitar on SYT) but mostly because it's the swept-under-the-rug collaborative side project whose sheer propinquity to the band's decade-defining opus (YHF, M&A if you couldn't guess) renders it ambiguously tossed-off scrapings of the most serendipitously inspired parts of Tweedy and Brock's careers. Weird to qualify it that way when I'd say I "like" both the bands, but they each also made one album for which, it seems to me, the stars aligned. So Loose Fur is more elongated and jammy, sure, but O'Rourke and Tweedy both had enough interesting ideas at the time to sustain the album. Something like "So Long" may evoke the misunderstood noise of A Ghost is Born, but when those strangely resolute O'Rourke vocals click on like a hum it makes for an interesting point about elements of a song being indifferent to one another – moreso with "Carnival Knowledge," which almost predicts "Spiders/Kidsmoke." The album barely avoids wearing out its own smooth redemption: the songs' beginnings scrape together the remnants of the previous song's climactic dissonance, channel them carefully (as much so, in Tweedy's three blissful moments, as the standard YHF drone-ballad). Especially for someone who puts stock in names – Last.fm's done it to me – this is one to indulge in, and, from everything I've heard, nary associate with its Dad-rock followup. 8

LSD March - Totsuzen Honoo No Gotoku (White Elephant, 2002)

3.3.09  Neat-o find. There's a certain thrill of indeterminacy when, say, CMG gives its all to breaking out a group and when I scout out Sordo (Google it, the page called quack, and that'll be my buried hot tip of the year – though don't blame me if you sink into an abyss of diminishing marginal returns) they've got something crazy early by the group posted up. In this case, though records are hazy, it looks like the first LP proper for this Japanese band, and I love how even something as captivating as "dreary psych" really doesn't hold up to the product. It's the little motifs I thought I'd forgotten: the Moe-Tucker plod of "Kurai Hanataba," where the space of the recording makes the groove almost implicit, a product of our subconscious knowledge of Physics. Call the Dungen-styled opener misleading and call the title track "too far," if you must (you hear those elements smashed together despite sounding so individually deliberate and you realize how mercifully monochromatic most noise rock is) but I don't think that whole unified aesthetic thing is their bag. Thing is, they have one, just by virtue of being this melting pot of garage, psychedelic, noise and something else, a uniquely Japanese element of quirk. They shift their weight on just about every song, but I'd probably be bored if I heard their prolific output extensively – this is, in other words, exactly the amount that I want from this album. Except the last track. I want that last track.  8

4.29.09  Really, it's that tricky balance between being "in the mood" for the band, feeling like it has a "sound," and acknowleging that I'd put a different song on a mixtape depending on who I'm giving it to. Call the confusion a subjective warp; I still recommend it. >>7.5

Pinkie Maclure – Favourite (Placebo, 1995) 

11.12.09  There’s a year-end (and decade-end) list compilation theory that I tend to ignore: if there’s a tie somewhere, go for obscurities. The idea is you’re more personally inscribed in the artists of whose fanbase you make up the greater percentage – or vice versa. Plus, the list is more interesting to read. Hence my angst at compiling my 2000s list, uncommitted as I am to much beyond your Arcade Fires and YHFs. Soon enough you’ll see the boring list for yourself; maybe that’s the best vouch to be made that I don’t award bonus “obscurity points.” I just root for the little guys, cross my fingers every day that I’ll find a Pinkie Maclure.


It’s only when backstory’s hard to find that I really get etiological. There isn’t a complete summary of her career that I can find; the phrase “active since the 80’s” is batted about while even her scattered Venn-intersection discography is mostly 90’s output. Just finding out that she was Scottish felt crucial, like some free-associative blend of Irish/Cranberries styled yodeling and the folk tones of her recent work with former drummer for Loop in the scarcely-less obscure Pumajaw. (I would also have said Irish there.) It’s probably just looking for a reason no one knows her, despite the fact that she was encapsulatory of the best music of her time. But when I pop in Favourite, an album I’ve positively binged on for almost two weeks, it all dissolves into the visceral: even her obscurity becomes clutter, the need for an origin myth a misguided journalistic rigamarole.


So too late, then, to the actual music. “Hedonistic” spirals through twelve measures of underwater loop before Maclure’s not-so-secret weapon, her impossible voice, hatches. No holds barred, it feels like everything she ever wants to say all at once: the elongated accordion acting the organ, unstable yet unfailing, the rattling percussion, and a cumulonimbal wordless howl. An interesting thing happens in both “Hedonistic” and the second track, “The Rain Is Out.” Both hit you with the chorus right off the bat, amidst any number of other loops, which makes me think of a friend who said Elizabeth Fraser “speaks in tongues.” The choruses feel ceremonial, ritualistic, omnipotent, but they never attain the same force again – the somersaulting phrases in between actually compromise them. I’ve hit the rewind key to see if the second chorus of “Hedonistic,” which rides the potential energy of a suspended dominant chord, actually has some sort of emptiness to it compared to the first, a humanity, a confusion, but the technical differences are negligible. This is all the more remarkable to me – Maclure conjured enough ambiguity in between to internalize the loops and drones, to turn the ritualism inside-out, to see it refracted through doubt instead of, I don’t know, exoticism. In a sense, it’s the same move again with that strangled birdcall towards the beginning and end of “The Rain Is Out”; the first one’s a distant sound in the lush night, the second is a strangely familiar catharsis after a brow-moppingly concerted repetition.

 

All of which ends up being Pinkie Maclure’s unique power and majesty. It seems quick and easy to compare her to the most prominent avant-garde singer of the nineties, Bjork, but Bjork always sounds exactly and inimitably like herself. Pinkie Maclure, with an octave range that sent me poring through accounts about whether “Pinkie Maclure” was a person or a multi-vocalist band, is a queen of dialogism. Because I’ve never heard anyone whose music reminds me instantly of so many others without ever compromising her uniqueness. Her ability to slip in and out of old-school jazz in “Garden of Delights” – “you’ll never regret a cloudy day” – evokes Beth Gibbons on “Glory Box,” if only for a moment. Sometimes she strangles her own voice until barely anything comes out of it (the anticlimax of “Heartsease”), like any avant-garde brass instrument, but she never submits. It’s as theatrical as the album cover suggests, though far more Lynchian, the way these different characters gurgle out of her, spar and settle.


And when she’s not unraveling her own lexicon, it’s impossible to know whom she’s talking to – certainly not the listener. Her lengthy vendetta against “Heartsease” (I’m thinking: Hartsy’s as in Thai Food? Heart seize? Heart’s ease?) treats the namesake like a character more than an abstraction. The accordion – finally acting the way an accordion is meant to – is swaying through scales like it would in any Decemberists song, and it’s eventually swapped with, holy shit, a fucking harmonica. Instruments of nostalgia, these, and somehow despite their almost insolent simplicity more elusive, more worthy of Maclure’s pleas, than the rigid percussive loops we’ve come to expect. Since most of the backdrop evokes a careful setting into perpetual motion of cogs and cords, only the tiniest things beyond Maclure herself create tension in the system. After the “Hedonistic” chorus, a fretful guitar struggles to its feet and is immediately knocked over sideways by the pendulum of the chord change. “It’s a maze down here,” she supplicates in “Garden of Delights,” which her writhing vocals suggest, if not the most entrenched drone of the record. When the momentum of the album lets up (it’s a taut 34 minutes) on the curious, loping closer, “Rose Flavour Talc,” Pinkie Maclure, for all her struggle, evaporates. If you’ve got one of those repeating CD players, you’re totally prepared to hear the ritualism of “Hedonistic” again, somehow always impressively otherworldly no matter how many times you’ve heard it. 9

Magnetic Fields - Distortion (Nonesuch, 2008)

1.9.09  I listen to this and wonder why I brushed it away in making my year-end list, and why, apparently, so did many others. It fades, to some extent, when you aren't listening, but I just can't bring myself to say anything bad about an album that was made in such remarkably good taste. That would be, taking the "highlight" (if we're to nitpick the vast with such an idea) of their opus 69 Love Songs, which for my money was the JAMC-lo-fi-wash of "Yeah! Oh, Yeah!", and base an entire album on its production values. Lo-fi shoegaze never took off except out of necessity (we're young, we're creative, we're stoned, we have no money), it seems; maybe the term is too inherently antithetical or something when the genre's forever dominated by an album so immaculately three-dimensional as Loveless. Even JAMC went straight-up pleasant as soon as they could. But the way it operates on this album is, to me, a strong defense for its remergence, not a lame mixing gimmick like Times New Viking's peak-a-boo. Vocal harmonies in particular sound almost like incidentally charming amp-weep at first, and a band so well known for microscopic hooks does well to make them a little hard to find sometimes. That is, in fact, why the album works: we know the Magnetic Fields are just unbearably catchy so we're ready to pick out melodies on faith even when, admittedly, each song sounds at first like a blurry mess. It's a better move than naming every song with the letter I (equally great and exhausting for taking us up to 82 Love Songs) though I guess this album's reception has been a similar response to anything put out a band that made absolutely sure in one fell swoop that they would become a meme. This lets us forget everything that was charming about that meme in the first place: especially undercut, I think, are the opinionated, cynical and completely biting lyrics across the board: "California Girls" "breathe coke and have affairs"; "Old fools who believe / that they can dance and sing / and fall... in love"; "I want to be a topless waitress / I want mother to shed one tear." If you hate everybody including yourself with a smile on your face, they're absolutely charming to listen to. What to do with the more assertive reactions to the sound – "Till the Bitter End" remains one of their most elusive efforts for its swirling billow: I'm thinking, you can't recede, you can't betray your meme, guys – is another question, and while it points maybe to interesting directions in the future, they'd be hard pressed to make an album so bloody appropriate for their abilities. 8

FTR: 69 Love Songs (Merge, 1999) 8; i (Nonesuch, 2004) 7.5

Matmos - The Civil War (Matador, 2003)

4.29.09  2003 is going to have my decade-end list clutched in its jaws. That's not a vow for this album; I just can't get enough of the fucking acoustic pastiche. Matmos wins the award for most albums perused exclusively on my radio show before fusing into a gestalt – which is still antsy. Maybe The Rose Has Teeth In the Mouth of a Beast is the most "them" record, in that their foundsound schtick reaches the free-floating conceptual plane at which semen may or may not be the auditory centerpiece of one song (apologies to my brother-in-law for that poorly-considered christmas gift! not that you'd know it without the critical institution; maybe that album's a bit of a thank-you card). Then their most recent one is classic Cluster & Eno (as all critics are wont to mention... another thank you card? Maybe they weren't being as ironic as they seemed in the opening paragraphs of "numbness and numbers") multilayered minimalist synth lines. So I don't want to relegate The Civil War to just another trendgobbler, but just listening to it I have a bit of trouble denying that sacred completion, that beautiful Euclidean record that it seemed for a moment electronic musicians could conjure. No shit I "lump": SF Sorrow and Notorious Byrd Brothers are delegates and all that. But it'll be awhile before this clump, The Lemon of Pink, Up In Flames, Rounds, Neon Golden, and finally The Civil War becomes something I'll need delegates from. I only really feel that way listening to Bibio, maybe, but even then I've never had such plentious spring adhesive. 8

Meat Puppets - II (SST, 1984)

1.1.09  Okokok it took me awhile to start to really respect this beyond "Plateau" which has only become more of a beautiful monument to transcendental slackerdom as I've heard it more, because at the level of gimmick I just can't appreciate this the same way I can't appreciate certain Ween. It's easy to clump the two together, but it also prevents a certain enjoyment because especially post-Guava you get to a point where modes start giving orders, the confusion is lost. Pull the fibres of this music apart and you don't have a cohesive chunk of cowpunk anymore; you have proficient locked-in ABA instrumentals, some super-ahead-of-its-time noise pop and even JAMC-style shoegaze, post-Chilton-proto-Tweedy vocals that harmlessly stumble into walls and cabinets, surprises, really, around every corner... one starts to see where this becomes the Holy Bible for the early-mid nineties whoevers, your Archers of Loaf, your Silkworms. But the best thing about not seeing it (or even its individual songs) as a statement is that I'm suddenly ready to delve right in and I practically get chills imagining just the sort of thing waiting for me. 9

Memory Tapes – Seek Magic (SIC, 2009) 

 

11.22.09  Hot Chip didn’t “spearhead” a damn thing. Whatever it was about The Warning that made it such a crossover success – like, as people are wont to jump to, the soaring and heartbreaking coda of “And I Was a Boy From School,” hatched, as it were, from the beat – it wasn’t generalizable, though apparently skinny-pale-geek camaraderie beckoned that meek vocals emancipated genre experiments like no other (Phil Elvrum may have succeeded in his Black Metal Valentine Wind’s Poem, but disco’s ubiquity is a different matter, dogma being what separates metalheads from indie kids and nothing but folds of irony when we’re dealing in camp.) I know as well as anyone that strange sensation of actually enjoying something ironically. It took me the longest time convincing a few friends to watch Serenity the other night that I didn’t just find the terrible dialogue and shameless cliffhanger transitions funny, I thought they were genuinely awesome for their audacity. So that, say, this is the perfect time for someone to release a flat, talentless disco record is not a totally foreign idea to me, but it works best when I feel like I’d jumped to conclusions at some point, that I’m better able to appreciate the perfect anachronism from my current position than ever before. ‘Cause, like, Serenity actually got a strangely layered, nuanced plot going from piling on the clichés to that extent. The characters actually developed really splendidly. But besides a few shards of different Garageband settings that I’m fond of – say, the “Cocteau Twins” guitar setting on “Swimming Field,” none the more run-with beyond that – this release relegates itself too quickly to Mall-muzak in your own home to be inviting to my likes. Ө

Memphis Khan - The Merchant EP (Reverb Worship, 2009)

7.29.09  Shout out to Memphis Khan, who nailed their particular aesthetic – which just happens to hit all my personal pleasure points – on the head, to the extent that their "Beat It" cover works entirely by virtue of its existence. It's not the EP's strongest song, but its creeping realization does what a great cover ought to do: make the original seem a little under-realized, perhaps, or bound by its performer's ego/consistency. Moreover, it makes you hear the original differently, if you're like me and you don't tend to think someone like 80s Michael Jackson had much brewing under the surface of his songs. But Memphis Khan's real success is they feel, if not completely original, somehow necessary. I want music to have this sound, and it's a direction I've always been facing without having so many canonical groups pointing the way. It's Tennessean without the cultural vices, or the cultural vices seem to pale in comparison to the sheer space, just humming, feedback, organs, silence that isn't silent. Read a 1962 Hunter S. Thompson piece on how dry and early-to-bed they really are where they actually play bluegrass music (in the wake of its faddism), the party ends at 9:30. Makes you think about forgetting politics for a second and thinking about just how alone you are far from the city, and how that loneliness extracts the marrow of nature, undoes itself in the face of one moist bag of juice. 7.5

Microphones - The Glow, Pt. 2 (K, 2001)

4.13.09  Lo-fi, sure. What people forget is that Phil Elverum is a producer at heart, that he didn't approach this album all 4-track-Robert Pollard style though that incessant foghorn would beg to differ. It's his arrangements, the way guitars slip in and out of sync, the way the epic opening pair of tracks strangle and then open up, the way most of the album rises out of insurmountable emptiness, the way we just have faith that there's a heartbeat always ahead of reality like those psychology tests where subjects' skin became conductive before they consciously saw horrifying photos. "Samurai Sword" is the only moment of unwarranted despair, the familiar chunky distortion positively painful on the heels of Elverum's least cynical moment, "I Felt Your Shape." He was wrong. Need to scrounge up something older from this group, though I don't think they ever scraped together such a bleak, integrated opus before. One that does convince you it's "lo-fi," that it's a snapshot, despite its fever-dream depth; one in where you either wait in cold sweat for "Map" to cut through the album or you'll get cut yourself. 9

FTR: It Was Hot, We Stayed In the Water (K, 2000) 8.5; Mount Eerie (K, 2003) 7.5

Mission of Burma - ONoffON (Matador, 2004)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Obscurant as late Nick Cave albums, I need to realize that Vs. can’t be tossed aside quite so easily, despite everyone’s momentary enthusiasm for this. Ө

Juana Molina - Un Dia (Domino, 2008)

12.31.08  This was a pretty sure bet for me, loopy as it is. The construction reminds me a bit of El Guincho, but Molina is really only here for the X party for the first track, and the different melodies she applies are more subtle tweaks than jubilant basks. Makes me think about how you can take a super-basic chord structure and create a clutter of arrangements that twist it from it's bare Western-tonal charm through different histories, dispensed in appropriate portions like po-mo soft-serve. Which isn't an attack; the linear development is measured, but take a given moment, or a given shift, and it'll be an epiphany along the axis of the guitar in The Beta Band's "Push It Out." I hold that this is a cerebral tactic, even if it's most common in electronic music, because it's of interest to people who want to see mapped out how the sounds they're hearing are constructed – and made by musicians who have enough confidence not to feel like they're showing their hand. 8

Roy Montgomery – The Allegory of Hearing (Drunken Fish, 2000)

01.04.10  My old roommate Liz had a semester-long radio show that was devoted exclusively to the New Zealand independent scene of the past quarter-decade – not the unnerving Semester-Abroad expertise that constitutes many of WOBC’s World shows, but an actual excavation of a strangely vibrant and cross-cultural (flat-out Western, even) experimental pop scene. The stuff is, arguably, consistently better and more interesting when drawn from a hat than any other single country’s, you know, entire musical oeuvre. It’s probably the drone/shoegaze element that entices me the most: one of Stereolab’s huge early influences, Snapper, were amongst the founders of the relentless two-chord buzzsaw organ, albeit because they stuck to the formula so relentlessly (whatever works, right?) But the dirty secret behind the impressive across-the-board quality of New Zealand is that Roy Montgomery was a member of about 50 of the groups, or so I’m told (see Dadamah – New Zealanders are in the habit of renaming every new combination of the same musicians, which looks impressive on a DJ playlist). I wish this would-be defining statement defended Montgomery’s reputation a little better. To both his credit and his detriment, it sure does sound like an actual solo album, meaning the songs, when more than a single guitar, at least emanate from one source bookended by unobtrusive accompaniments of bass, etc (never drums, never vocals). Protracted fades (-out and sometimes -in) do the album in the same way cross-fades did in Faust’s late-career Ravvivando, which was also ostensibly a collection of sound experiments. Ravvivando at least emphasized the differences between the tracks; Montgomery seems to rely on the silence itself to be different enough to wade straight back in. Evoking Snapper’s persistence, Roy succeeds in creating a defining sound, which ends up essentially being a Cocteau Twins or Cure guitar track singled out – a recognizable, pleasurable and surfeited effect that everyone with a Mac now has easy access to via Garageband. My problem is this: if we are to adopt one of distorted drone pop’s foundational tenets, that the chords do not matter, that all is sculpted, chiseled, cheated away by sound, then what gives? It’s almost like Montgomery wants us to turn our attention back to his twiddling progressions, or just put his songs on mixtapes where they’ll contrast nicely. Whether “Resolution Island Suite” is better simply by virtue of its 17-minute length is an interesting but ultimately useless thought experiment: Montgomery doesn’t need that much time to unfurl some interesting development in his songs, though it’s apropros that he thinks he does: that sick organ break at 7:30 didn’t need to be earned, but it wouldn’t have been a standout track on its own, and the remaining half an hour of finger-drumming gumdrops confound more for “Resolution”’s, well, resolution.

The National - Alligator (Beggars Banquet, 2005)

1.9.09  Ah – the cycle is complete. The first National song that I appreciated was "Looking for Astronauts" and the last was "Mr. November." The former appeared on a compilation of child-worthy indie music (well done, guys, Berninger sings "don't wear the watch / when you're out with the cunts") and I had heard many a tale of gruesome heart wrench about the latter long after I had decided it was a little to, I don't know, hostile for me. I like the idea that this album goes down in the records as the definition of a "grower": I've devoted a month or two to each of my favorite cuts on this album, and now that I've had my "Mr. November" moment I'm afraid to actually offer myself to it in the same way that seemed so natural for, say, "Daughters of the Soho Riots," which made it onto a Mom mix before I realized it wasn't just "pleasant," or "Karen" with its artful trifecta – how they manage to so gracefully encompass both the swooning strings of "I wouldn't go out alone into America" with the head-pounding rationality of "It's a common fetish for a doting man / to ballerina on the coffe table, cock in hand" and, holy guacamole, one of rock's most cinematic nadirs:

Without warm water in my head, all I see is black and white and red
I feel mechanical and thin, hear me play my violin again
I'm living in the target's shoes. All I see is black and white and blue
Idle, idle, idle, idle-
Protect the nest, Protect the title...

So in case they don't stand up quite so well on my paper, sweet baby jesus what a lyricist. I like to see this album's incandescent guitar lines as the blurry brain-basement halo to the more prominent piano on Boxer. This is an album of endless self-contradiction, self-doubt, self-denial, whereas I think there's something to be said for how Boxer really swept people off their feet for its more public context to the lost. Maybe this is the voice of our generation, though we're scared to really call it that: "We're half awake in a fake empire." Everything thunders and rolls around Berninger's doubt on Boxer, whereas the world doesn't follow rules in Alligator. I used to say there are ideas that feel somehow instinctual but are clumsily enacted, like the yelp-chant in the background at the end of "Secret Meeting." After hearing Boxer's smooth U2 landscapes I found myself wishing for blemishes, wishing for an album where he might let "Say something pretty, something I can steal" collapse into an endless spiral: "I'm so sorry for everything." This is where Mr. November comes in, a song of such woundedness that it can be hard to swallow whole. But when you get to know the guy, you never want to believe, want him to believe, anything he says as much as "I won't fuck us over." 8.5

11.30.09  I mean, just for accuracy's sake, I had a lot of trouble not putting this on my albums of the decade list. Usually there's gestation, a steady climb, but this one shot up very quickly in the past year for me. It's been a long time since I've needed an album like this before, since I've felt my own impulsive garbly thoughts chanelled into such perfect units and then emitted from my own speakers. I want to say you can't analyze it, even though I always want to, but the one thing that's for sure is you can't fake it. 9

FTR: Boxer (Beggars Banquet, 2007) 8

Natural Snow Buildings – Shadow Kingdom (Blackest Rainbow, 2009) 

 

11.06.09  If I weren’t such a Venus-in-Sagittarious junkie for consuming sound waves and fossil fuels simultaneously, I’d never get the chance to fall completely in love with drone-folk opuses like this. Because, shit, first order to business: a double album to the brim, nigh-on 160 minutes of songs ranging from 2 to 25 minutes. I like lots of the gradual stuff, like how “Porridge Stick Into the Fire and Dust in the Direction of the Sun” manages to shift from the most atonal, key-free stretch on the album, the hollow branch-bending static electricity before a storm, to almost soothing enormity. You hold down fast forward and you can’t believe how much some of these songs change – you’d swear the change was internal, like you’d been convinced – meaning time is as effective an instrument as any sympathetic sitar. But it’s the “one-two punch” of “The Fall of the Shadow Kingdom” and “Gorgon” that lay out the album’s project. “The Fall,” like any other “long first trick,” overwhelms me with its hyperthetical everythingness before I even have the earliest analytical capability, before I’m beyond the blurry-eyed infant stage in the shadow kingdom. It’s not just horizontal tones, see: I hear effort and arpeggiation, I hear illegible voices and detaxonomized wails, none of which can crack out of the song itself. The implication is that everything that succeeds it is sculpted from the comet tail of its lingering overtones. This stuff can’t be wedged into real memory. So “Gorgon,” of course, is its perfect Kameraform foil, nearly as different in length as it can possibly be and as stripped and bare as “The Fall” is plenary. Solange Gularte’s voice is completely gorgeous, as is her acoustic guitar – and by some accounts this is still drone here, the phrase jumping the octave midway without foil, over and over sans discrete chorus – and they’re isolated only very rarely throughout the rest of the album. But it always seems like passing through a door into volition, like everything else is just feedback, a version of what’s already been. Her tragedy is her brevity, her tendency to fade back so easily into everything else. I want to say that I wish I could hear more of her, but that’s selfish, to demand a symmetrical infrastructure, to demand Another Green World which for all its insistent atmospherics doesn’t take the theory so far. Point is, life behaves this way, we’re piqued by chaos and unity and universality and when we get clarity it doesn’t matter how spare or ephemeral, it’s enough to lift the dense, infinite weight of everything else. That’s the key here: it’s not just about human vs. environment, it’s about how the most unexpected things can balance the meaning of surfeit: absence, discreteness. That’s why the philosophy of this album merits its length (there’s an even-more-appreciated triple disker bounding around out there, but it feels weird to get proportional) and why the notions of balance and completion have to act as its precedent, not its resultant. It could swallow my end-of-year list whole, but its scope deserves everything anyone could sacrifice and then some. Hence starting with “The Fall,” the failing, the bounded 25-minuteness; only real experience of the world can make sense of its shadow. Very “Allegory of the Cave,” yes? 8.5

Neutral Milk Hotel - In the Aeroplane Over the Sea (Merge, 1998)

1.14.09  Oh Christ, is it down to me then?

I'm not sure I've read any truly remarkable writing about this album, any writing that actually adopts the album's disposition toward the very function of words before its first line is written.

I'm not going to write that review yet, though part of what I love about this album is that I know I can, I could any time, like my three-time poetry professor can blow through one of his favorite poems and analytically shred it into some sort of explosive intellectual confetti.

The other day it was the "holy shit no one's played this yet" album project, and I mentioned that the song that gained the most from it was "Oh Comely," originally too circular, too spare, too reliant on the assumption that it could exist in its existing, too much goddamn faith in it to be anything but a roadblock to my complete enjoyment of the album as a string of moments. It devours the album whole: time is no longer an issue within it, just that tidal rise and fall of its neverending strum. "Dee dee dee" being the point that I almost broke into tears even though I knew it was coming like a sigh, a song so filled with words that it has to eventually lose faith in them (Destroyer's lalalas are fascinating for this exact reason: the absence of words for the linguistically inclined is spiritual, not a submission to a pop motif though that may be part of how they want to communicate what they're communicating). I tell the others that the lyrics are free-associative, and someone says, "well, no, I think they mean something." Sometimes it feels like nothing means more than free association, nothing maps out our intricacies more, our "Cobweb – wove in Adamant – / [our] Battlement – of Straw –" as Dickinson said in "I had not minded – Walls."

Language, says a friend of mine who's madd subsumed in this shit, is the intersection of habit and impulse.

Lester Bangs wrote his Astral Weeks manifesto a decade after it came out, and Neutral Milk Hotel arrives thirty years after that album and our generation's manifesto is already too late. Part of it is format: if I were to write I'd need to be thorough even when the album, that "beautriful dream / that could flash on the screen / in the blink of an eye and be gone," is tangled up in the satisfactions and dissonance of brevity; one cannot acknowledge its problem by solving it. I'd need to columnate to pick apart moment-by-moment all the different images and emotions conjured by its linear descent "plus or" ascent:

Your father made fetuses with flesh licking ladies while you and your mother were asleep in the trailer park. Thunderous sparks from the dark of the stadiums, the music and medicine you needed for comforting, so make all your fat fleshy fingers to moving and pluck all your silly strings, bend all your notes for me. Soft silly music is meaningful/magical: the movements were beautiful, all in your ovaries, all of them milking with green fleshy flowers while powerful pistons were sugary sweet machines. Smelling of semen all under the garden was all you were needing when you still believed in me.

In some ways Robert Schnieder's ejaculation is the only review that we need.

As my recent casual interest in astrology indicates, Capricorn's interests are not in the Social or the Personal but in the Universal, so what just tears me to pieces about this album – besides the fact that I somehow shrugged off Mangum's wail initially – is that it's managed to mean so much to so many people on something other than a technical, piece-by-piece basis. Yankee Hotel Foxtrot makes sense, sonically dense and varied as it is, but seems sometimes like everyone's managed to live inside Mangum's head for those not-even-forty minutes and believed in it. That's what Lester Bangs needed to instill with Astral Weeks: he didn't pick apart every single moment on the album, he just told me to believe in it and I did and all of a sudden Morrison's voice wasn't a peripheral gnaw, but something that completely filled me and threatens at all times to leak out. Nothing can affect me this much without stirring my creativity, leading me to need to wrench more out of it in my own artistic splurge.

This is not it.

A friend of mine said that the whole basis of Mangum's quit-while-ahead recoil was never a calculated Bill Waterson self-consecration, an act of economics: Mangum said that he stopped believing that music could heal. But an ever-expanding circle do, and though I'm ashamed of an instinctually reductionistic past, and often too possesive to make this sort of declaration, I have to join it in blood. I'm, in some sense, "all in."

Whether his faith is still alive, only Mangum can explain his own myth, I sometimes feel. The religion is never Christianity, but maybe that goes without saying. He's created something that perfectly fits into the paradigm of the revisitable art piece, a spiral of white ever the contradiction that is life, ever the intersection of instinct and habit, ever the centrifugal meeting the centripetal: "God is a place you will wait for the rest of your life." 10

Odawas - The Blue Depths (Jagjaguwar, 2009)

(First Published in The Grape)

3.15.09  A timely soundtrack for the great Midwestern thaw, this one, pairing a Jim James croon with an unflinching plunder of the synth-set-on-strings New Age aesthetic no one seemed to mind when Cluster did it. Which is to say, I can’t necessarily or sufficiently delineate Odawas’ third album and Enya except to say that people are more likely to approach this one from the Fleet Foxes/Z-era MMJ/Band of Horses cult than any other. (That and I have a moot hunch there’s a demi-ironic commentary somewhere in here).

Those groups all made music that was pleasant and consistent – to a fault, for some listeners. Odawas takes those adjectives to a certain extreme, to a point where, for better or worse, you notice them again. So color me a lazy reviewer, but these eight medium length tracks aren’t to be reductively chopped – better to wait for the little surprises, like how naturally a fusiform harmonica can rise out of the synth soup, or how the cheeseball-doom Orc-soundtrack chasms can come off tugging, ambiguous when paired with Michael Tapscott’s tearjerking voice.

Those vocals: you realize people only think Neil Young’s a meme (Wayne Coyne, Jason Lytle, Doug Martsch, c’mon guys, Venn Diagram that) even though, when you listen to these guys, comparison’s the last thing you want to hitch them to. But the songs wouldn’t be the same if they were bare-bones, and the production is firmly grounded in a sort of slow-mo nostalgia; you will like this album more if you’ve been obsessed with Twin Peaks before. In an age when plenty of bands write pop songs and proceed to forearm the masterfade into the red, Odawas quietly explains why cheese took off in the first place. 7.5

Odd Nosdam – Burner (Anticon, 2005) 

 

10.23.09  Ah, the audacity of drone. Cultural psychologists, in their tightly-wound, ineluctable binary, might attribute the roots of drone in East Asian folk music to that region’s “collectivistic” beliefs about how society functions. True-blooded drone music has a multitude of elements that are impossible to separate with your ear, and is even harder to analytically peel apart from its genre. This might be why I don’t find the Alash Ensemble, for all their visceral plateaus, on pasty Van-Halen-adorned “Greatest Albums of All Time” lists. Nor does it seem right to wad them in amongst my own pasty counterparts. The Guitar Hero generation steps forward at their designated coda to prove their worth, they were made to be ranked. But you can’t rank a genre, you can’t rank a culture, man. Which is why these things make so much more sense when you drop non-canonical reggae and non-canonical death metal. And, to be sure, the non-canonical Eastern drone that Johns Cage and Cale tapped for interstitial philosophy, and for which, in the greatest of ironies, they received fistfuls of Western confetti. Then I go to the Stars of the Lid and have to yawn adamantly, because Christ, my music is prescriptive and not descriptive; I want consumption; I want balm or burn.


Thus, we get the ever-straddled hyphen-pop, which in the case of drone can go by at least one bland qualifier: there’s pattern, there’s change. More simply, Odd “burns” accurately because when the oscillators cut through the air with an octave or triad, we eventually have blind faith that the chord will ratchet, most often in the eternally rewarding pair of half steps up or down. I eat up two-chord songs like I chow binaries, and unlike cultural psych’s individualism-collectivism/Weest-East, I almost never think they overstay their welcome. If people don’t think Burner’s fully realized, it’s because the tendons of fibrous samples, beats and clots of noise that crosscross the album, all those things that ground it in the Anticon collective’s aural hub of alt-nerd-additive-hip-chop, seem utterly at the mercy of those huge and perfectly proportioned tones. The agency of the album, Odd himself, is drowned out by whatever God you have, be it celestial, extraterrestrial, natural. Cue the space-age slice three minutes into “Untitled Two,” context-coloring indistinct chatter with mottled impulses, fear, thrill, shaker-style paroxysm. Or the army of seraphim straight from the tripgaze vortex of the 90’s calling out from halo’d nimbi in “Untitled Three.” If people don’t think Burner’s fully realized, it’s because Odd’s intricacies are on the foothills of, essentially, a few alternating white-key patterns, a distortion knob, a gloriously well-chosen instrument setting. If these are bigger than anything in our lives, if these seem to channel the vast movements of people, cultures and time into the most tempting symmetries, then it demands deconstructive thoughts unravel themselves sooner than the burn – the chemical reaction itself, the final carbon of all things. Ashes to ashes. It’s beyond collectivism, beyond blur; it’s about desire, inevitability, cessation of moments. Call it easy, but nothing could be more whole.


There’s a litmus test in here: either you find those “mad M83” towers of crackle and fuzz beautiful or you don’t and it’s with full faith in the former that Odd unflinchingly steamrolls his album with them time and time again. It feels familiar before the album even ends, before even the first track ends, yet distant enough that the album can close with a qualmless eight minutes of it. Which is probably why it feels more like a tap than a bounded entity: “Upsetter” clutters/sputters into and out of existence so quickly that there’s no doubt it’s just being obstructed by overlarge bookends. So, too, for the silence in Burner’s wake. 8.5

Okkervil River - The Stage Names (Jagjaguwar, 2007)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Black Sheep Boy was a grower, but that logic can’t sell me on Sheff’s albums since, wherein the best tracks are, more proportionally, simply the ones he pours the most into. The analysis isn’t as tough here: I love the first and last tracks, and I’m pretty sure there isn’t “A Stone” on here, no song beckons a swoon from across an emotional tundra, the contents just feel like lesser imitations of the peaks. “Our Life is Not a Movie Or Maybe”; “John Allyn Smith Sails”

FTR: Black Sheep Boy (Jagjaguwar, 2005) 8

Jim O’Rourke – The Visitor (Drag City, 2009)

12.10.09  Christ, reading (skimming, I should say if I’m honest, but Kindle Kulture would never miss a beat) music reviews has my psychology zonked in ways that I can only understand when I’m not doing it. One is these sort of Pavlovian reactions to, like, the very image of words and names. I don’t think I’m the only one who gets this with Jim O’Rourke’s name, far less questioningly than the now-entangled history of, say, Dave Fridmann. Thing is, I think O’Rourke’s legacy, as it prefers to be known, might be a false one. I end up actually thanking Jay Bennett, God Rest his OCD arrangements, for the perfectly channeled avant-garde of my current album of the decade, after seeing I Am Trying to Break Your Heart (I think you get a glimpse of O’Rouke smoking a cigarette passively, maybe, at one point) and its post-Bennett followup lacked an edge: some glisteningly off-the-press experiments and a whole lot of strangely dainty and/or jaunty (common ground being Low Stakes I suppose) piano-based pieces. Getting into the lauded Insignificance yielded similar incredulity: sure, I guess there are songs, but really, what the fuck is going on here? Why does he just say outright, “It’s not like I want to be gay/But I can’t help myself/It’s just that I am”? My subversive-hipster-irony radar is overloaded with this guy, so I have to return to what I know. Jim O’Rourke makes really pleasant music, full of nods to relatively obvious classic rock and classical sources, none of which seem either gimmicky nor seamlessly integrated. There’s just not enough force to that (here we go again) jaunty banjo break, like, we’re not listening to Beck here. He pops into the major-third slide guitar that the Allman Brothers sapped so long ago twice, but doesn’t commit himself. Dude doesn’t commit himself! None of this comes down to a criticism, or even one of those backhanded “it’s pleasant” reviews, because the album’s clearly quite labored over, and for what it’s worth he’s got we writers in a pickle, especially those who want to talk about “scenes” as if they spell themselves out by their contents. I submit that that’s the only reason he decided to make The Visitor a single track, to jam critical gears, make this music somehow harder to talk about than it already is (we can always jot down timestamps, come now). Everything I really like about it is sly as can be, like how at 15:00 I believe that’s the first true sign of dissonance, like how I’m still thinking I could give this to a parent for Christmas at 25:00 without realizing that it’s somehow innocuously gotten into some sort of a minimalist-free-jazz knot. That it’s so very complete is a gimmick and a test of how reliant we are on track volume in iTunes, but it’s still a meticulously crafted and deceptively (Strunk and White say that word’s a danger zone, and I will choose to leave it undifferentiated) “low stakes.” 7.5

FTR: I'm Happy, and I'm Singing, and a 1, 2, 3, 4 (Mego, 2001) 8.5; Insignificance (Domino, 2001) 8

Pains of Being Pure at Heart - Pains of Being Pure at Heart (Slumberland, 2009) 

11.06.09 It’s probably worth starting this off by talking about everything in the 80’s and 90’s that this album rose directly out of. This shit is mad ubiquitous, if you know where to look. For me, it was my first second radio show senior year of college, which became in my mind a sort of diametric opposition to the black hole of noise and formlessness and loops that my other radio show was starting to become. Freed from the presumption of originality, I started to scour the WOBC 7” vaults, filing cabinets jammed with vinyl that no one, near as I could tell, bothered to look in anymore. (They’re digitizing their entire CD library now, like a lot of stations, so who knows if browsing and DJing will have the same crossover again?) The vault itself constructed the station’s halcyon days in my mind: early-80s to mid-90s, the assurance that even complete unknowns were going to take only three simple minutes to please whoever listens, that teetering mid fidelity spit-shining the jangle and fuzz without enveloping anything, the physicality of juggling black discs between songs, the sort of uncategorizable, all-enveloping joy of the culture that totally overtook the individual joys of songs. I’m not like this, but I can’t resist it. Unsurprisingly, caricatures were all that remained in the canon – the Replacements and, especially, the Smiths stick around as vocal phenomena, the most idiosyncratic and anguished voice-of-generation versions of stuff that, otherwise, a hell of a lot of others were doing. So level anachronism at Pains, but don’t call it samey, because for anyone who dug up/out the Go-Betweens or the Bats there’s a more elastic mindset. Like, defy economics why don’t you, diminishing marginal returns has no say with this stuff. I stumbled upon three songs in one semester – “Train From Kansas City” by Shop Assistants, “Secret For Julie” by Eric’s Trip, “An Old Man’s Dream” by Red Crayola with Art & Language – that had such a similar vocal melody that I pretty much wrapped them in the same heartstrings. Talking about a lot of RIYLs, I know; that’s because Pains is a welcome refresher course on what we missed when radio was still alive. Yeah, “The Tenure Itch” is my jam, but that pretty much boils down to arbitrary heard-it-first point-and-play. There’s not a dud in the batch, making the only topic for discussion the sheen degree: the elements are so loud and distinct, as per the times, that sometimes this feels more like a dissection of the past than memory lane. The type to tweeze stuff anyway, I can’t say I mind. But surely lo-fi only through association, right? All I know is that as someone who just totally devours this stuff, and who thought college radio had dragged it along to the bottom of the ocean, it’s nice to hear it alive-if-not-kicking alongside its more sonically anxious contemporaries. 8

Pavement - Wowee Zowee (Matador, 1995)

11.22.07  It's really amazing that Pavement've become the gods of self-serious hipsters, because speaking as someone who at the very least is cripplingly self-serious when it comes to music tastes, it seems perfectly natural to consider them overrated. I read somewhere that Pavement was in many ways the end of the rock-God myth; the first time listeners got that modern indie sense of unity with the artist, liek they were just a bunch of guys who decided to pick up guitars. Thing is, Pavement weren't, as my theory-conscious friends remind me. It takes lots of work to persistently maintain that middle ground between power-pop and complete dilapidation. "Oh, shit, I'm not tuned right... not that any of you would notice" Malkmus jabbed at p4kfest, I guess aware that so much of their stuff, esp. on the first two albums, doesn't feel like it's locked into a grid at all, you could give or take a few milliseconds on the notes and it would retain its charm. Phil Elvrum is the king of that, but really the only argument I can make is circular: surely it wouldn't sound good if it really were full of sloppy human error.


The point being, Pavement's music came closest to feeling "godly" in their latter years when they tightened and crispened up. THeir legacy, however, is an utter lack of tautness. The vocals, the drums, the chords, all feel rubbery, elastic and sagging. I found this neat and satisfyingly pulled-off (if perhaps simply too integrated into indie culture to seem novel anymore) on the fuzzed-out Slanted and Enchanted, but my first Pavement album, the lauded Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain, remains my least favorite because its sharp and carefully delineated parts and sections spelled pop purport. When I listen to it, my mind aches for everything to be shifted just a few degrees (and thus Weezer), and I find the most solace in it when my mind works the malleable sounds and structures to its own ends. I'm literally picking up the imaginary slack, and after a few songs that slack starts to seem not only exhausting but somehow predictable because each song has its own little twists and turns that I'm treating identically. It's work even though I'm not substantially paying attention to it; these should by campfire singalongs, nostalgic anthems like "Two-Headed Boy" for people pretending to be old enough to have enjoyed this when it came out, but I don't have that shit memorized (red in the face anytime I hear a friend play a tipsy guitar line and can only identify the band) and thus I'll need a handful more close listens – overcoming a certain inevitable emotional barrier at this point – before it can sit still in the background for me.


So yeah, I'm told that anyone who doesn't flat-out worship Pavement will inevitably like Wowee Zowee the best. Lord knows I get a decidedly non-Pavement rush from the two-note guitar line and Gen-X ooohs of drone anthem "Kennel District," but I can appreciate it cerebrally more than their other albums, because it feels like an important and definitive statement – rather, Antistatement. CRCR was twelve tracks with only calculated song variations; if I were sold on it, it would have that kind of economical Kid A/YHF power to it, but if Pavement's songs are mottled, give the brain tiny tugs in different directions, so too should be their albums. People can jabber about how this is their White Album all they want, but I don't buy it. This wasn't a careful study in self-imposed boundaries, establishing archetypes and banging the shit out of the walls (if never breaking them down), it was sheer brain puke all the way from a bunch of musicians who obviously had a huge number of ideas. Genres are incidental, scraps of musical passions past from each of the members (of course country is an uncharacteristically prevalent one). I can get lost in this album the way Pavement's best songs beg to get lost in (note well, this is also the only album that doesn't feature one of their best songs first, by my standards – a good thing, because that amounts to an "it's all downhill from here" attitude with many of their other albums). And the ideas are out there enough to be appreciably head-turning. Any ten-plus-minute stretch can be used as an example: "Half a Canyon" has that blast of static that turns out to be Malkmus deep-throating the mike in uncharacteristic catharsis, and minor key organs are always a knee jerk love of mine. End on an example? Insert conclusive generalization here! Maybe I will, though it's uncharacteristic of Pavement and this review as a whole to do so. And there you have it. 8.5


FTR: Slanted and Enchanted (Matador, 1992) 8.5; Crooked Rain, Crooked Rain (Matador, 1994) 7.5; Brighten the Corners (Matador, 1997) 7.5

Liz Phair - Exile in Guyville (Matador, 1993)

1.1.09  To me it seems absurd for the sprawling, approach-to-making-music 18-track lo-fi opus type and the every-song-on-this-album-represents-an-axis-of-my-life type to converge, but it's that sneaking suspicion that makes this album so remarkable to me. My latest is "Shatter," a nice deservedly long piece that dabbles in 90's-giveaway-reverb and the sort of ambient noise like distant traffic that Yo La Tengo mastered for, like, two and a half minutes before she starts singing. Most of the album she doesn't feel like she has the space to breathe like there, but my god the B-side "Ant in Alaska" which gets up towards six minutes could've been the album's centerpiece if it had been originally included. Of course it has its highlights – "6'1," "Explain It To Me," "Never Said," "Strange Loop," "Fuck and Run" –  not so many that it doesn't feel stylistically bound together and not so few that it ever really feels like a GBV pummel. 9

The Phantom Band – Checkmate Savage (Chemikal Underground, 2009)

(First Published in The Grape)

2.20.09  Let’s be clear here (ok, as usual, I won’t); even though the term “Krautrock” is a lazy, meaningless – and, as illustrated by my emigrant grandparents around Christmas, still pretty offensive – term for a manifold scene in 1970’s Germany, you can’t help that people are evermore fascinated by it. Chalk it up to Kraftwerk’s eerie prophecy, I suppose, 808s and Heartbreak as the best-programmed “soul” on the digital market, but we’d be blessed if we actually got a full-blown Krautrock revival. Partially because it wouldn’t cohere in the slightest.

So you’ve got your “Spiders (Kidsmoke)” public-domain skinny dips (devil’s advocate; I love that song) and, less often, a group that internalizes it as a means. Enter Checkmate Savage, the debut from Glasgow’s The Phantom Band. They can muck around in washboards and sequencers in equal measure, because they’ve got that pulse going. “Folk Song Oblivion” and “Halfhound” are both encrusted with Black-Keys-style blues riffage, and both have down-home-redemptive major key choruses. But they rarely change their minds midway: “Left Hand Wave” is all the better for riding its split-level drone through the end.

It’s refreshing not have to qualify this stuff with “samey to some,” even if their sound experiments don’t always gel. The exception might be Richard Anthony’s vocals, which, though Scottish, sometimes veer a little too far into alt-rock-90’s territory for me. On closer “The Whole Is On My Side” he croons over some nice extemporaneous arpeggios, “I know I have been foolish/ we were only trying to behave like humans.” Forgiven by default, I say. 8

Pontiak - Maker (Thrill Jockey, 2009)

5.14.09  Would a simple "fuck yes" suffice? Well I want people to know how this really hits the pleasure centers for me – see, P4K's not totally useless, you just have to look at their 7-range ratings instead of BNM (I think I got confused when someone said that once but it's starting to make sense). Meanwhile, some of my favorite albums this year are relatively shat upon by groupthink nexus RYM: The Phantom Band and Micachu (review to come! I need to review 2009 albums more, eh) both included. Perhaps to "situate" in a nice RIYL cobweb: less polished than Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, more consistent than Red Red Meat ("Sister Flossy" still their "Sister Ray"), less Dad than Drive-By Truckers. Avant-garde's misleading unless being really ruminant about the cud a turned-up amp can spit out counts. Hell, I'm not doing this justice... just, you know. For the record (what else is this blog?): Fuck yes. 8

Portishead - Third (Island, 2008)

Review in Pleogasm Magazine 9.5

FTR: Dummy (Go! Beat, 1994) 9; Portishead (Go! Beat, 1997) 8

Quasi – When the Going Gets Dark (Touch and Go, 2006) 

11.03.09  This one was clogged in the contextual clot of too many promos during an internship, and I kept it because I had a glimmer that certain pieces of it that I might otherwise cherish were getting preemptive eye-roll treatment. I did pick the title track as a standout for its eerie wail of a chorus – if reluctantly for its verse’s gin-soaked ramble, “And they’ll tell ya… sign up for the winning team… or get out!” – but it’s a moment of organization and clarity that they willfully neglect for most of the album, right down to three tracks of straight instrumentation in the middle. I’ve heard better things about their earlier work, but on this album they sound desperate for a new direction, a band unaccustomed to racket trying to make one. (Like, how many piano clusters can you cram in before it becomes macro-percussion, a punctuated-nay-punctual theme?) When they take actual influences, they’re respectable but misshapen, some gritty Perfect From Now On sprawl on the opener, a dash of soured Flaming Lips. But when they try to craft a dense and experimental album, they don’t know more than a common-sense handful of ways to actually execute that. Classic “try it if you’re a fan,” not simply because it’s lower-grade than their other stuff, but because it genuinely might excite me if it had some substrate it was actually stirring up. Ө

Red House Painters - Songs for a Blue Guitar (Supreme, 1996)

2.25.09  One of the simplest snippets of journalistic brilliance to stick with me has been Deusner's "this is Kozelek time" in reference to the 20 minutes enveloped by the first two tracks of April – like there's a fucking coefficient out there somewhere. Actually, that doesn't sound too bad. Nice to have a cathartic gateway into the album almostcool would call Kozelek's apex like "Have You Forgotten," to which I guess I as good as tore myself open and offered myself. It's a fine line, but April didn't quite earn its space as far more than background music; more than 10 years ago the songs had enough intractable stuffs in them to become cumulative rather than flat. I'm glad "Have You Forgotten" wasn't watered down by dmu – & it's worth mentioning that these ostensibly "genius" but unassertive types are one of the great darn-it hurdles left for me that I'm aware of, Cf. Bonnie "Prince" Billy – because "Make Like Paper" takes the cake for this tidal quality. Plus I was already in spasms that the album wasn't mostly acoustic like Sun Kil Moon, it had plenty of that sublunary "Cowgirl in the Sand" thickness peppered throughout. Always welcome, but moreso is the end of "Trailways" which I thought only YLT had really mastered. When you've arrived at feedback, when you're lassoing overtones, you've usually given up beauty to chaos – despite the perfect science of the thing. It's not a comparison many would make, of course (mostly I get moans of "it's too DEPRESSING to listen to right now") and I was colored by the beautiful-if-the-original-were-unknown- much-less-if-it-were-once-your-favorite-MM-song "Tiny Cities Made of Ashes" (for some nice elementary-school schema see cokemachineglow's Venn Diagram). Actually, I was just listening to "Silly Love Songs" and I had a miniscule epiphany. Brow furrowed, I counted the single repeated notes towards the beginning and got 12, over the length of a /UU/UU/U beat. But the mathematics, as always, dissolved completely: not only do I like that he stuck with that one fucking note for so long, I like that he didn't sound quite locked in – it's redemptive when this independent, perseverent streak that seems to shoot off into the stratosphere falls into the cycle once again. Steve Reich took this to its logical extreme, but when these structures aren't tatooed, logic has nothing to do with it. 8.5

Rubik – Dada Bandits (Fullsteam, 2009)

12.18.09  Man… fuck me. this is exactly what I mean when I say that that flat affectless facial icon is only “negative” in the sense that it represents a certain frustration with review writing. Words have the evolutionary function of solving problems, and it’s identifying that before/after “what’s gained” mentality that makes me wish I didn’t spew air about how I’m not proud of the air I’m spewing. It’s not like I didn’t nod my head with the beat/idea a handful of times in this record, which means the nonanalytic contemporary listener would probably be thrilled to hell by it, but guys, I can’t support such a RIYL fuckfest. Cultural bodily fluids everywhere. “Fire Age” stuck out to me as the most painfully familiar, and I couldn’t even tell if it was the tune or the whispery disco-glam vocals or, God forbid, both. I ended up deciding, with a sort of unsatisfying splat, that it was the occasionally fist-pumping but usually just annoying MGMT that it was seeming to remind me of directly. But there’s everything, it’s like a 2000’s Best of Indie Pop: kitschy synths, wispy falsetto vocals, arpeggiating keyboards, even the odd throwback to cymbal-fizz-heavy BSS drums. Am I being a cerebral prick or narcissistic to say that this stuff functions in too small units for me to care anymore? I’m saying ,“hold on to that feedback at the beginning of ‘Richard Branson’s Crash Landing’” but of course it’s clipped with arbitrary precision. The omnivore’s dilemma. Maybe I need to give in and just get out rubber stamps for the four or five major categories of contemporary sound – that is, switch to RIYL form, at least for the blank stare – and call it a day, because the more I write the more depressed I get about this stuff, about how I’d so easily be able to qualify a calculated Best New Music if I had any accountability, about how infinite variety somehow comes full circle and nestles itself into the words on iTunes as a sort of monochrome. Like, how many reviews like this can I write? Highly recommended for anyone but me, I guess. You have your whole lives ahead of you. Ө

Screaming Trees - Sweet Oblivion (Epic, 1992)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Some Gutter Twins reviews said something like “we wouldn’t expect members of old failed grunge acts like Afghan Whigs and Screaming Trees to resurface with something like this” but I figure, that’s a pretty oversimplified assessment of at least the Whigs’ unique intersection of soul, sublunary swagger and 90s sludge guitar, so I give this a listen. Lanegan’s voice isn’t even all that low, which is a shame, and in almost every other way the oversimplified assessment takes off with this album. Grunge being one of my less favored generation-definers, that equates to just plain awful for me. Even “Nearly Lost You” doesn’t hit any pleasure centers for me. Glad Lanegan found the blues, and has since become a sort of rusty-voiced standard that I’d felt I’d heard long before I did, but he’s got a few points on his license too. people listen to music. Don't think I'd hold it against them, but don't think they'd ever read this many words about Lindstrom either. people listen to music. Don't think I'd hold it against them, but don't think they'd ever read this many words about Lindstrom either. Ө

Six Organs of Admittance – RTZ (Drag City, 2009)

(First Published in The Grape)

2.20.09  Anyone else catch the latent ethnocentrism when people oscillate between describing music as “otherworldly” and qualifying it as “Eastern”? I’m not jabbing fingers here; thing is, Six Organs of Admittance’s Ben Chasny seems fascinated that different tonal systems can be familiar by sheer immersion. Take the space between the opening strums on RTZ’s highlight, “You Can Always See the Sun”; if you know what you’re in for, the minutest shifts in phrasing can put you at the edge of your seat.

I read somewhere that the popularity of 12” vinyl sparked a major structural revolution in free jazz, because the length of recorded output became limited to the 20-ish-minute “side.” The arc wasn’t forced, it was just internalized. I don’t know if it’s serendipity or causality that 20 minutes is my own musical attention span – suffice to say this nearly 2-hour opus isn’t to be swallowed whole. It’s best seen as a bundle of distinct pieces chosen for a theme: that freeform works best when it marries immersion (they exist best on their own terms) and limitation (they’re still twenty minutes each).

Given this, that the third LP serves essentially as a rerelease of his 2000 album Nightly Trembling seems lazy next to the far more essential previously-unreleased “Punish the Chasm with Wings” – one of the loneliest songs Chasny’s recorded for its piano subsumed in sirenoid white noise, its Yiddish violin loop curdling into electronic gobbets. Maybe Chasny’s more recently become bored with his own instincts as a long form guitarist, but this compilation feels like an artifact of a time when he was determined to treat anyone else’s tool as habitat. 8

FTR: School of the Flower (Drag City, 2005) 9; Shelter From the Ash (Drag City, 2007) 7.5

Solex - Low Kick and Hard Bop (Matador, 2001)

3.15.09  Some bands I listen to a handful of songs and scamper off to write about them, to weave them into my discourse or whatever. So credit Solex, my favorite recent epiphany, with making music that I just want to sit and repeatedly enjoy all the fucking time, to the point that I'm really just writing in my blog to say so. It's a pop masterwork, and I'm not talking about no "it's just a rock record" Is This It (I rag on that album a lot; truth is I like it even when what it means I don't) deal. It's not barebones, it's kitchen sink music. But since it's too easy to just slap any interesting music with the "genre-hopping" tag, I'll be a little more specific: the biggest genres it dips into are country and jazz, but it never lives in them. Which is to say, stand-up bass clutches the music but doesn't control it; slide guitar/harmonia snippets roller skate over the surface. Because her biggest advantage is a nice Tom-Waits-sans-the-dead-bodies groove, which makes the album feel like some  rapid punching of those orgasm buttons psychologists give to rats. Her voice more noticeably ties it all together even though she does have a "sound," partially because we don't expect music this carefully put together to tickle the girl-pop paradigm. It makes for an easy barometer of who's opinions on music are knee-jerk, and who's are gutteral; it's nice to think that I can sometimes fall into the latter. Can't go far enough to justify this as a "classic," but it reinforces an idea that a lot of us have to believe to criticize most of the shit out there, that if you're actually brilliant enough this shit can dazzle. 9

Sparks - Exotic Creatures of the Deep (L'il Beethoven, 2008)

2.27.09  I guess I'm glad to have missed these guys' allegedly shitty, saggy mid-career, because knowing only this album and Kimono, really, I can at least subconsciously admire them for keeping it together. They're one of the great older discoveries of my past year; Todd Rundgren found the sound-alikes but unlike his catalogue they stuck to the weird Queen-on-speed thing instead of descending into used-vinyl-stack Mom music. It's hard to introduce them to anyone who hasn't, as Nick Sylvester told me, "give[n] up on the idea of 'serious' music." The fact that most people hasn't means that there really isn't a lot to compare them too besides Rundgren's short stint. Some might lump them with Ween or something but mostly Ween hasn't gotten 2 close except on "(My Fantasy)." It's strange how paradoxical complaints can be: are they repetitive or spazzy, for example? Are their synth lines cheezy or jarring? Is Russell's voice too dynamic or too uniform? In other words, you have to appreciate it before all these distinctions are pleasurably dissolved. I can see this album maybe has fewer ideas than, to be sure, Kimono, but I can't help that I support the idea of Sparks as a band, and their song titles are hilarious (even if I wish they didn't actually sing the title in "I Can't Believe You Would Fall For All the Crap In This Song"). It stands as the sort of inductive hipster fare that I'm proud to like: you can put it on and drunk people will dance to it while the manifold ironies paralyze others' smirks, and people with generally "decent" tastes in music will want it out of their ears or out of their brains for one reason or another. 7.5

FTR: Kimono My House (Island, 1974) 8.5

Spiritualized - Lazer Guided Melodies (Dedicated, 1992)

1.4.09  A word about 9.5's, if I may bore some of you out there. It's not exclusive, but I tend to see that as the echelon of submission, at which I'm so glad that the album was made, its philosophy is such an important part of my particular taste in music, the way it affects me, that I stop being so damned reductionistic. Some say this happens in all criticism, but with these albums in particular I'm really just leaping off the way it's bound to make me feel, and giving it a free pass for whatever else it wants – the appreciation precedes the investigation altogether. I'll defend it like a loved one, defend it like a moment. Other examples are the inevitable I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One and another stellar find this year, Stereolab's Transient Random Noise-Bursts With Announcements. If I wanted to be more calculating, perhaps Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating In Space would be my Spiritualized album of choice, having more variation and surprise, perhaps, but Lazer Guided Melodies is Spacemen 3 sans the urgency of innovation (proto-shoegaze as inherently punk, see JAMC), given room to breathe and exist as an entity. Maybe, in the end, just given the production value to have differentiating dimension between the songs, so we need not bite our nails over the two-to-three-chord patterns – not that I do when connies aren't around anyway, I like to think. This album came at the right moment for J. Spaceman, I can tell, before death and propulsion set in, and it came at the right moment for me to take death and propulsion away, one last time. 9.5

FTR: Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating In Space (Arista, 1997) 8; Songs in A&E (Fontana Int, 2008) Ө

Spoon – Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga (Merge, 2007)

 

12.28.07  When I was reading praise two years ago for Spoon's Gimme Fiction, it was nigh-on impossible to figure out, from the few details about the actual sound that weren't contextual to the rest of Spoon's career, just what these guys sounded like. "Rock" seemed like the only thing anyone could agree on, but no one went to any great lengths to discuss how much Spoon rocked out. They were no Hold Steady, certainly no White Stripes. But the way reviewers seemed to be mapping out every tiny decision that distinguished each song and that album as a whole from "other" Spoon fare suggested only to me that there was something about these guys that, despite apparent pop proclivities, the music hispter elite really respected. It seemed to need a listen just to understand, but Gimme Fiction was decidedly not the place to start with them.

 

It's not that these awe-wreathed reviews were misleading; the first thing, I declare, that anyone needs to know about Spoon is that they are one of the coolest fucking bands making music today. And it all boils down to the little things that seemed to frustrate reviewers so. Who can convincingly gush over a single two-note stacatto trumpet line that comes in for four bars a minute in? They're cool because of their blue-balling restraint, because in a signature Spoon song every minute element is necessary and sufficient. Again, not so much true with Gimme Fiction as with their "masterpiece" – I've yet to really marinate in the purported slack sleeper A Series of SneaksKill the Moonlight, one of the best albums of the decade for sure. Britt Daniel's vocals are the sound of youth, energy and libido caked with the immutable rasp of reality, be that hours of shredding his speaking voice over bar music or the nicotene that lines his throat. Every one of these barnacles of experience he carries are key to the theme of Spoon's music; they capture entire fuck-all generations at a time with present-tense lyrics about circadian lifestyles: "We get high in back seats of cars"; "All the pretty girls go to the city"; "Small stakes will kill time/when you're stuck in the back of the line/ it feels alright friday night to sunday/ aw, it feels alright, keeps your mind on the page." When he says "son you must go/ back to the life," there's no question for Britt that the word "the" belongs there.


"Back to the Life" is an interesting song to look at a bit closer, because like so many other Spoon songs it can be mistaken for an utter mixtape classic. For starters, there's that fucking amazing strum 'n' percussion line that sounds like it has gunshots going off, bookshelves collapsing, everything in the world falling apart and reverting over and over again. I'm glad as all hell that Stylus' (R.I.P) 50 Greatest Rock Drummers article took so many liberties with the definition of great and bombarded us not with fifty masturbatory virtuosos but with Steve Shelleys and Ringo Starrs, even sneaking the spectacularly unusual Moe Tucker into the top 10. And, of course, Jim Eno who Andrew Iliff tackles beautifully: "His absences constrict the songs to their constituent elements, giving sound nowhere to hide." Spoon's sounds don't hide, which is why I'm surprised people still talk about how they're only indie by association, a flub in the market, "gloriously commercial" as Rolling Stone puts it. "Back to the Life" has only a few elements to it, and one is that weird, slightly haunting synth-string note being held out, dipping and rising like a roller coaster built to nauseate. Call the immediate grab of the song its fist-pumping momentum, call that string line the doubt that grows beneath it.


It sounds like I'm saying something absurd, like that Spoon isn't as instantly likeable as people say, and that may be it to some extent. Their charisma is flat-out magnetic, yeah, but the more they strip things down the more scrutiny each of their decisions bears. Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga beats around the bush less than any of their previous albums, and yeah, it's a "return to form" after Gimme Fiction, maybe even more "their" album than Kill the Moonlight which still seemed like it was just trying to one-up the Strokes on occasion. But check out what's plopped on the listener right off the bat in Ga's second track: "The Ghost of You Lingers" is one of the most tense things they've created. It's not a buried "weird" track in the second half, it's a statement of purpose, and it all comes back to that whole idea of what stripping away the flesh of pop leaves behind (in this case, Ghosts). It's an ever-winding spiral of suspended and diminished chords banged out furiously and unceasingly on a piano, while Britt's reverbed-to-infinity vocals mumble falsetto nothings in the background. We want drums after two bars like a good little pop song, but the fuckers don't give it to us, and we're left to stare at the stains on the walls of a mostly-empty room. I'm not saying Ga's all about tantalizing the popster's addiction and then weirding him out; I'm just saying that finally there seems to be no mistake that they intend to put everything out there and let the contradictions wrestle with each other. 


So irony, if you want to call it that, looms larger on this album than perhaps any before. Call it the band's remarkably hipster appeal, almost to the point of repelling me with its straight-faced "I promise this is coherent" incoherence. This band has the resources to do whatever it wants, the good sense to funnel that "whatever" into small doses, and the audacity to offset it, to italicize the last two syllables of that word. Vocal snippets abound on this album, and yet there's only a hazy sense of location; some drumstick clicks have echoes of warehouse proportions, some basslines wriggle up and down your earlobe. I've always been inclined to call Spoon pop geniuses, geniuses of the people, before I'd call them mad scientists. They've always seemed to be on our side, but a good pair of reflective sunglasses ought to keep everyone scratching their heads. And if that doesn't sound like a good sell, keep in mind that the band's already proven its capabilities to create perfect pop moments, and they continue to do so. But they're pulling plugs, as we watch ourselves, our lives, swirling and spinning so rhythmically, simultaneously we catch a glimpse of the drain, all darkness and plummett, our final destination. Yet round and round, for now it's a hell of a fun ride anyway. 8


FTR: A Series of Sneaks (1998) 8.5; Kill the Moonlight (2002) 8.5; Gimme Fiction (2005) 7.5

Richard Swift – Dressed Up for the Letdown (Secretly Canadian, 2007)

11.24.09  There’s got to be a “meh” threshold where it becomes “bleah,” but that’s the only way I could hope to quantify this. It would give me a war to wage. The “context is all” argument yields a few compelling directions – for example, that Eluvium and Enya are separated by camp not quality (strong inspiration for the latter’s drop in my Odawas review). That ended up being expansive: I recently bought and thoroughly enjoyed an Enya Best-Of, I have no shame. But you’ve got this reciprocal, too, this contractive derision. Like, what the hell am I supposed to do with Richard Swift, who comes off as the sort of bland superlative that conquered the nineties? Give it to my mom? Review it? Even finding out that good friends with great taste used to like Counting Crows inscribes a certain mark on that music. This is sorta the groupthink equivalent, which actually gave me a solipsistic crisis listening to Clearlake’s cedars in a dark room alone, simply believing that the music alone had the capacity to save someone. I’m starting to get used to it, but critical listening has me jotting down in a bloody Excel box that I like the bass break in “Buildings in America.” But fuuck. Who cares? Most of the album doesn’t even sound like it was arranged by Swift himself, the abyss of limited-liability studio musicianship. Like, Mountain Goats had to earn their polish, Darnielle needed to know his voice (literal/figurative) alone was DIY enough to remain relatable and interesting; entering Swift’s discography at the wrong point comes dangerously close to confirming personal fears that the fuzzy DIY aesthetic is all some of these guys have, and if they don’t hold onto it, if they actually wish they “sounded better,” its their past alone that tethers them to a scene. Strange to feel so unprepared for so little, strange to have Swift’s couch potato lyrics say it best: “I wish I was dead most of the time, but I don’t really mean it.” I need a tooth-grinder, whether anyone cares or not, so yeah:

10,000 Maniacs – Our Time in Eden (Elektra, 1992) 

 

10.25.09  Wish I could isolate the moment at which I thought there was something really worth delving in this group – or at least a 90s synergy that was relegated to the corners of the decade, a la Cranberries. As it stands, the revelation of the moment is that this is the origin of Natalie Merchant, the unresearched associations and connotations of whom come a lot closer to mapping out the best and worst this album has to offer. Which isn’t much either way – just Pandora silage, which has to do with whether the ear listens through separation or integration. Ө

Throwing Muses - Throwing Muses (4AD, 1986)

1.9.09  You can call this prototypical riot grrl music if you want, but to me it sounds like they're questioning themselves from the start. The album's restless, and its themes match that: "I could be a smack freak and hate society / I could hate God and blame Dad / I might be in a holocaust, hate Hitler / Might not have a child, and hate school / I could be a sad lover and hate death / I could be a neuro and hate sweat / No... I hate my way" and the angry thump turns into a delicate arpeggio. It's the sort of gear-shift that litters the album, to the extent that it might feel proggy if its narrative weren't so personally convincing. Kristin Hersh is trying to map out her life, and though she's got her share of hate it's not going to be straight up bra-burning rrrock. If it weren't so hackneyed, I'd reiterate Alan Light's Guyville liner notes, where he talks about the tendency to place Phair in an angry feminist tradition that she actually transcended. My response: no shit. Yes, it's bizarre that Vivian Girls sound more rooted than even the seminal debut of their archetype but maybe that's why Throwing Muses never turned heads the way it seemed like they should. Leave it to Sleater-Kinney, I suppose, whose fire consumed their doubt: "I shouldn't be smoking / this last cigarette / I feel sick / now there are words in my head." 8.5

Times New Viking - Rip It Off (Matador, 2008)

 

(Originally written for Writing About the Arts with Anne Trubek)

03.01.08 When I saw Yo La Tengo on tour last spring, a sprightly little trio opened for them and primed the audience’s eardrums – at least, to some extent – for the shoegazey onslaught that was to dominate the show. On the surface, the two bands seemed like they ought to be coupled: a genre obsessive would readily refer to each as “noise pop,” because both used a hell of a lot of distortion without abandoning a penchant for “hooks.” But such labels are misleading: the opener neither shared Yo La Tengo’s subtly dynamic sliding scales, nor their belief that noise should lead to new ways of writing melodies. Fun as Times New Viking’s Matador debut Rip It Off can be, its appeal remains head-scratching, a reminder that when we talk about the pop songs “buried” beneath the noise, we usually aren’t speaking literally.

Which is to say that they’d more accurately be classified as “noise/pop”; the two are simultaneous but independent entities, each taken to its simplest extreme and picking up the slack for the other’s deficiencies. This noise isn’t a “wash” in the soothing and sometimes gloppy early-nineties sense. It’s a pure teenagers-practicing-in-the-garage-next-door tantrum, with apparently little attention to level or balance. Live everything felt like a flood, but on record it becomes abundantly clear that they want to convey a sound so much bigger than their equipment that it can only come through in decomposed chunks. And that’s their aesthetic, insular as it may be; they don’t mess with it or aim to trip over sounds no one’s heard before.

The relentless noise could easily be upsetting if it weren’t for its compatriot. Melody varies a tad more – mostly because the singers are flat enough to obfuscate the line between tune and yelp – but for better or worse the songs rarely outlast themselves. When a guitar’s tone is discrete enough to stand out of the visceral mass, it inevitably loops some brief jubilant sequence of two or three notes for the entirety of a song. The music isn’t doomed for the seemingly straightforward songwriting or production; diametrically opposed in spirit as they are, boredom with one is immediately alleviated by an affinity for the other. And it sure helps that 10 out of 16 tracks don’t even exceed two minutes.

The best tracks really let the benefits of pop crush the competing noise (“Another Day”) or vice versa (“Relevant: Now”). But “competing” isn’t a tough way to see these two sides to Rip It Off, especially since the band tempers either of them so rarely. It’s occasionally hard to understand if this album is much more than a straightforward juxtaposition of two words in a genre many accuse of being inherently paradoxical. In this way, the “idea” of the band is both obvious and ballsy. On top of that, the songs manage to be the most engaging within their own microcosm – most of them would be totally jarring if they came up on shuffle or were played on a radio station. Having a characteristic sound too often involves an anal balancing of miniscule elements; since Times New Viking don’t have to worry about any of that, they’re ultimately the bigger blast. 

Titus Andronicus - The Airing of Grievances (Troubleman, 2008)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

This was one of the ones that I ended up, in my short-lived postmodern experiment for Contemporary Literary Theory, rolling a dice and then reviewing it based on the score. It was surprisingly easy to conjure hate for it, as it was when I glanced in the window of my school’s venue when they came to play. Not a Springsteen man myself, though able to recognize his value as a cultural trend (reemerging, I once wrote in a trend piece, for the working class man who wanted to believe in someone other than Bush – Reagan back in the day) I just can’t see how the juxtaposition with Conor Oberst style angst gets them anywhere. It’s emotionally confusing, and definitely not subtle enough to earn itself anything. TV on the Radio worked, at one point, because shoegaze needed an R&B undertone to universalize its big heart. Oberst and Springsteen don’t need each other, they don’t even understand each other. Maybe this is where dialogic cognitive dissonance comes in, who knows, I see it as self-cancelling.

Untied States - Insant Everything, Constant Nothing (Distile, 2010)

 

3.31.10  Tiny Mix Tapes Review. 7.5

 

Chad VanGaalen - Soft Airplane (Sub Pop, 2008)

 

12.16.08  (References to “below” occur because this was extracted from my 2008 EOY)  There's talk about the inevitability of human progress, how throughout history major discoveries have sometimes occured almost simultaneously across the globe without reference to one another. The idea of Genres isn't as big, or teleological, of course, but I do tend to clump them based on eras. Folktronica, for example, reached its peak around 2002-2003, one of the highlight moments of the decade -- it's getting some recognition now that the Notwist refused to update their sound in 6 years. "If you want to see how much you've changed, return to a band that hasn't changed at all." It gets a little more tongue-in-cheek with Chinese Democracy, but the fact remains that at one point people were excited by folktronica. Critics aren't as interested in labelling genres as they once were, which means my verbal palate is limited, but apart from New-New-Wave, or Post-Punk revival (The Strokes starting -- and I'm still convinced of this -- a sort of chain reaction wherein new bands took on the identities of the old; Franz Ferdinand a saucier Gang of Four, Interpol a more mechanical Joy Division) there's definitely a new major genre out there that really defines this decade which I sometimes call "freak-folk" even though it's more of an offshoot. Animal Collective, Yeasayer, newer Akron/Family, certainly the Dodos album listed below, etc. define it. Best I can tap into is the inside joke "Blyaah! We've discovered the meaning of LIFE!" but there's also a lot of psychedelia and compression there.  Chad VanGaalen represents the pinnacle of a sort of "genre" I personally noticed a bulge in this year, maybe because I discovered them almost all in the same month. It's condensed, intricate, sometimes even proggy but always "cutesy" pop music (cute prog-pop in a way Deerhoof could only pull off as gimmick). Some of it veers off on the utterly insane or harmonically jagged side (Dominique Leone, Max Tundra, Simon Bookish), some of it has a sound we're too familliar with as distinct to actually associate it (Stereolab, Vampire Weekend), some of it gets clumped as a sweetening of other genres (Why, MGMT) but Chad, and below, Shugo, both represented to me how these high-voiced musicians could balance a density of sounds, relatable emotional frequency, and sheer songwriting craft. (Interestingly, this also largely describes two of my major discoveries this year, also listed below, Todd Rundgren and Sparks). I find myself going back to the high-modernist bent I had on Sufjan -- it's just too well-constructed to possibily deny -- but this year there's a twist of anger that he is somehow deniable, or at the very least ignorable. Anyone who isn't, I don't know, totally annoyed by falsetto, would do themselves a favor to check out this great work. 8.5

Kurt Vile - Constant Hitmaker (Gulcher, 2008)

4.29.09  "So what have you been listening to?" "Um... the first three tracks off Kurt Vile." I get angry when an album isn't an album, still a twinge of offense at that answer, but I'm not going to deny the effects of marketing. Fact is, the vast majority of this album is in interlude mode, and it sometimes makes you think "Don't Get Cute," or the overlong "Deep Sea" are tightly-written gems. But hold those up to the first two tracks, Christ. "Freeway" is the sort of euphoric, rambling, down-home noise pop that's only really been attained by, um, War on Drugs' Wagonwheel Blues (Kurt Vile's the guitarist) and I can only think they didn't include it on that album because it'd be at odds with "Arms Like Boulders" (not that songs on that album are really ever at odds with one another, like they sometimes seem here). I don't want this to be a negative review of the album so much as a hoot for "Freeway" and the submerged Manu Chao vibe of "Breathin Out." That what I designed the little scissors for! (it's also just to give me a mechanism for actually deleting stuff from my computer, filing away awesome mixtape songs) I dunno how many reviews of this type I'll have, but here's your textbook example if you will. "Freeway"; "Breathin Out"

Ween - La Cucaracha (Rounder, 2007)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Again (see Dandy Warhols), the wrong way for a great (er) band to come up, perhaps, but I can’t keep this album on my computer. When they turned a certain corner on the awesome Chocolate and Cheese their humor, for better or worse, became derived from imitation more than creation. This album represents, sadly, the most profoundly burned-out failure of that imitation to actually entertain, from the public domain “Fiesta” to the ersatz-prog “Woman and Man.” It’s never terrible, but in a larger context one can’t really help but cringe. Worth mentioning that this band, in the post-C&C era, lends itself to “snip” albums. “Blue Balloon”; “Object”

FTR: GodWeenSatan: The Oneness (Twin/Tone, 1990) 8; The Pod (Shimmy-Disc, 1991) 8.5; Pure Guava (Elektra, 1992) 9; Chocolate and Cheese (Flying Nun, 1994) 8.5; 12 Golden Country Greats (Flying Nun, 1996) 7.5; The Mollusk (Elektra, 1997) 8; White Pepper (Mushroom, 2000) Ө; Quebec (Sanctuary, 2003) 7.5

Woods - Some Shame (S/R, 2008)

5.14.09  The politics of Me First presents a dilemma: should I tout the virtues of this tour-only cassette (of course I don't have it on cassette! WHY DO WE USE THE WORD CASSETTE?), even though eight of its ten songs are by most accounts the same on Songs of Shame? I say consider this a review of either release. I can't tell you whether "September With Pete" bogs the flow of the other release, I can only counter by saying that the remarkable cut-and-pasted second side of this record is a finely-executed deconstruction of themselves (apparently the closely-tied Woods Family Creeps errs more on this side). But the songs that really matter are still here: it still opens with "To Clean," just a flat-out paralyzingly beautiful campfire singalong, you immediately forgive the falsetto because he layers it communally and reaches sublime heights. "Military Madness," which is so integrated that I thought it was just a highlight not a cover, and of course, "Rain On" which pairs resiliently detuned and continual distorted guitars with cullinary melodic morsels. Any time I want to compare them, I listen to the "originator" and it occurs to me that I was totally off. Neither lo-fi nor freak folk except in my wildest hopes, not so much like Daniel Johnston, the closest I've come is Ariel Pink. But stranded in nature, but the editor he's always needed (Woods have now proven overtly that they have one). Consider this a contender for retrospective favorite of 2008; or, (oh please oh please) someone bless me to put this in my 2009 list – that's where Songs of Shame will inevitably land – without losing the credibility of (not) having the cassette? I mean, fuck all that, naturally; I really cling to this because pre-hype they were another revelation of what a few brilliant lads can do with a tape recorder in their lap, and post-hype I want to be happy for them. Sort of like my friend and Fall Out Boy, except good music. 8.5

Yes - Close to the Edge (Atlantic, 1972)

6.01.09  "The Great Comb" reviews were a product of transferring all of my music onto my girlfriend's computer. In some cases, I just couldn't bring myself to do it, which necessitates a sub-7.5 score. This is one of those albums.

Hate to use my pinky to flick an opus, but my earliest impressions of Yes fans is they like to chit chat about which of the songs is longest, not how it’s earned, or what you might gain for getting to the fifteen minute mark instead of the ten minute mark. And you know, it hasn’t changed much. Prog’s too easy a target, so I’ll keep this short. I’ve been bewitched by similar techniques before, but as long as Yes is an anachronism, I feel safe. Ө


Posted by enigmatichowler at 12:34 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, January 6, 2011 1:46 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
2008

Howdy

Like the lists and ratings listed most recently, these aren't here for critical purposes (i.e. to convince you) but instead to give you a sense of what my year was like. Tracks in particular are lamely intersubjective; the idea of the "best tracks" of the year is absurd, so I've posted the ones that I inevitably sought out on their own to fill a particular part of my life. So treat this as a document more than anything -- I feel I rephrase this warning in different ways each year.

Albums of 2008:

1. Portishead - Third (Island)

2. Chad VanGaalen - Soft Airplane (Sub Pop)

3. Paavoharju - Laulu Laakson Kukista (Fonal)

4. The War on Drugs - Wagonwheel Blues (Secretly Canadian)

5. The Music Tapes - For Clouds and Tornadoes (Merge)

6. Shugo Tokumaru - Exit (Almost Gold)

7. Why - Alopecia (Anticon)

8. Stereolab - Chemical Chords (4AD)

9. Beach House - Devotion (Carpark)

10. Dodos - Visiter (Frenchkiss)

 

Songs of 2008:

1. M83 - "Kim & Jessie" (from Saturdays = Youth)

2. Stephen Malkmus and the Jicks - "Baltimore" (from Real Emotional Trash)

3. Stereolab - "Valley Hi!" (from Chemical Chords)

4. Breeders - "Night of Joy" (from Mountain Battles)

5. Paavoharju - "Tytto Tanssii" (from Laulu Laakson Kukista)

6. Gutter Twins - "Seven Stories Underground" (from Saturnalia)

7. Drive-By Truckers - "Three Dimes Down" (from Brighter Than Creation's Dark)

8. Dosh - "Food Cycles" (from Wolves and Wishes)

9. Vivian Girls - "Where Do You Run To" (from Vivian Girls)

10. The Ruby Suns - "There Are Birds" (from Sea Lion)

 

Older Discoveries/Necessary Consecreations

Todd Rundgren - A Wizard, A True Star

Sebadoh - III

The Soft Machine - Volume Two

Sparks - Kimono My House

Stereolab - Transient Random-Noise Bursts With Announcements

Van Morrison - Astral Weeks

Ween - The Pod

 

 


Posted by enigmatichowler at 11:14 AM EST
Updated: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:57 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, August 29, 2008

Animal Collective – Merriweather Post Pavilion (Domino, 2009)

Behind the baroque of images hides the grey eminence of politics. -Jean Baudrillard 

4.05.09 I had a panicked, visceral response to walking into a Drug Mart the other day. You might think all drug store supermarkets are the same, but at Drug Mart you become thankful for the restraint that some other places demonstrate. These people don't understand notions of space, they compact as many products onto the shelves as they possibly can, all these icons, a density of marketing messages, stretched to its grotesque logical extreme because, hey, it works.

Please: don't see this as your standard backlash review, because Animal Collective's newest album, and especially the hyperbolic reactions it's evoked, is fascinating even if it doesn't generate a familiar pleasure-response for me. The easy summary is good ol' "too much," which seemed to be Strawberry Jam's gimmick (this album, the distillation, the supposed end of the "gimmick-by-gimmick" discographical approach that actually really mythologized bands like Radiohead), but you could level the "too much" at Yeasayer which was one of my favorite after-the-year discoveries of 2007. Thing is, though I sometimes feel like I'm staring into the hollow eyes of the antichrist with this music, it's not fundamentally separate from other music that I like – up to and including past albums by Animal Collective, which I still dogmatically swear by. It's not that they just "lost their soul" all at once – those vibe-standards are too amorphous – but who can honestly strum these songs on an acoustic guitar and recognize them? Almostcool related Animal Collective's discography to the evolution of mankind, so for the misanthropist, for the wide-eyed witness to Baudrillard's apocalyptic simulacrum, the "progress" renders us free-floating, disconnected from everything.

"Bluish," of all things, set me off, a song ostensibly lacking the dance-beat pistons (my roommate hears these everywhere these days) of the rest of the album but still a three-dimensional, nauseously-colored Disneyworld. I react with the ambivalence of a questioning insect smelling poisonous goop. How about that "chorus"? That's the sort of dollop people love in this album, a harmony that tugs at your associations a little too idyllically. Say it invokes Beach Boys if you must; I hear a Rice-A-Roni commercial jingle. Christ, it's such a spin on the song that I clamber for the days when I said Strawberry Jam had effects and sequencings poured all over it as though by a cement mixer, for the days when I thought they weren't thinking a lot about it. What freaks me out about this album is that it's thought out really extensively, with marketing-executive precision. I can't just wander into this. I don't live this way. I don't own a laptop.

In other words, it's not the Emperor's New Clothes any more, it's the Pied Piper. I see everyone dancing off in perfect harmony after AC into this glistening faux-reality, but this is not as Kraftwerk predicted. This is assimilation, not integration. Could I explain it further? Maybe. But that I can't explain it fully, that on good days I begrudgingly admit hooks and clever production flourishes, that Yeasayer saved themselves with "2080"s lyrics, that prevents me from crying nadir, putting a little bomb down there like our time is actually running out. Above all: I don't blame you! It just gives me the creeps – my own problem – that living, breathing people that I know believe in this. Moreso that if I didn't have this gut reaction, if I didn't have the apocalyptic spin on postmodernism, Donna Haraway's "Cyborg Manifesto," I'd dance off right with y'all.

12.02.09 Soundtracks should create something, even if through random juxtaposition. I mean, you could agree with Will Oldham, a fucking high-modernist if Rachel’s ever seen one:

For a while, it seemed like you were always seeing movies where all the music was determined by the music supervisors and their special relationships with certain record labels. And I just felt like, “Wow, I’ll bet they spent months or years writing this screenplay, and I’ll bet they spent months shooting this, and I’ll bet they spent months editing this, and now they’re spending no time at all picking these completely inappropriate songs with lyrics to put under a scene that has dialogue.” How does that even work? How can you have a song with someone singing lyrics under spoken dialogue and consider that mood-music, or supportive of the storyline? As somebody who likes music, when that happens, I tend to listen to the lyrics, which have nothing to do with the movie. And then I’m lost in the storyline. Not only is that a crime, but it’s a crime not to give people who are good at making music for movies the work. It’s like saying, “We don’t need you, even though you’re so much better at it than I am as a music supervisor.” Like […] that Darjeeling guy. [Wes Anderson’s] completely cancerous approach to using music is basically, “Here’s my iPod on shuffle, and here’s my movie.” The two are just thrown together. People are constantly contacting me saying, “I’ve been editing my movie, and I’ve been using your song in the editing process. What would it take to license the song?” And for me it’s like, “Regardless of what you’ve been doing, my song doesn’t belong in your movie.” That’s where the conversation should end. Music should be made for movies, you know? (source: Onion AV Club)

Thing is, I’m more free associative than that. My mind jumps from Algebra Suicide to the Bobs in a flash, I can only retroactively assume that that’s because they were both the songs on one mix from Rachel that were fuzzily recorded from an 80’s college show called Bad DNA; I think of an old neighbor whose parents listened to Bobs cassettes; I think of other artifacts from the late 80’s dada counterculture like Red Dwarf, I think of Betamax tapes. Algebra Suicide hasn’t left the equation yet, there’s somehow a composite nature to the whole thing. Which is to say, Wes Anderson’s movies are effective precisely because his iPod may well be on shuffle. Like, I drive late at night with music on and picture myself getting in an accident and the music continuing to play, injected with a sort of bittersweet beauty. This morning before I’d had my coffee I spilled a bunch of tiny pasta shells all over the counter and awkwardly picked them up as Kate Bush’s “Running Up that Hill (A Deal With God)” was playing. The combination was totally random, and yet so sublime that I almost wanted to pick up the old camcorder again.

No such rush when I tried to move a large speaker off a window bench so I could sit cross-legged and listen, hopefully for the last time, to Merriweather Post Pavilion. A thrice-broken incense holder that was sitting on top of the speaker fell on my head as “In the Flowers” took the least mercy on me – rather, existed more completely without my experience – of any random soundtrack I’ve ever had. No holds barred, I am a complete wreck; Animal Collective’s newest album hasn’t a single blemish, not a graceless note that any within its army of fans would change about it.

*          *            *

It’d be easy to accuse me of being too contextual. See my Captain Beefheart review – I’ve been known to color things sans “close reading.” And my thoughts about MPP are hopelessly entangled with a series of incidents, practically mere images. Five angry, accusing pairs of eyes in a circle around me at a party, all belonging to good friends with whom I’ve exchanged music for years, as I say it doesn’t do anything for me. Liz’s film You Are Human when my character recommends Animal Collective and puts on “Brother Sport,” and the monotone-voiced main character who’s been mapped out more by the Akron/Family (s/t) soundtrack than her own words, can only call it “soulless.” Rachel and I driving in silence on a dusty Sunday morning. “Maybe your friends all want you to like it because they feel like they’ve finally bought something on their own that they can share with you, something that you once recommended to them.” I tell her, even though I know she doesn’t like it, that I want to get indescribably high with just one of my good friends and listen to the album through, let all of the layers separate into gobbets of genius, allow music to connect me to other people like it once did. I want to like it… or do I? Is it just a matter of pride? But getting high just makes it worse, as soon as “Also Frightened” comes on I’m staring around in anguish at the others, chatting about Obama or something, it’s like a fucking “Tell-Tale Heart” scenario. I hear through Matt that Erik says I wrote a review of the album without having listened to more than one track, probably just because I (humbly, I thought) told him that I “hadn’t given it a chance yet.”

But these things can usurp, just look at how MPP devoured Dan Deacon whole before I could reach my arm down its throat, one can see in the former review that I was pondering and rationalizing my thrill for Yeasayer, it’s on the brink of killing the new Sunny Day in Glasgow album for me not to mention past Animal Collective albums that I’ve loved (cf. Rob Mitchum’s review of Make Believe where he questions his own generation’s blue-eyed devotion; cf. Christopher Alexander’s excellent Zeitgeist review, wherein he alludes to the Rolling Stones’ attack on Lester Bangs’ memory). The point is, yeah, context matters, especially when you dislike something. In “Numbness and Numbers” I think I actually asserted that you just don’t see hatred of art without context. Like, the 0.0 bomb gets dropped on those heroes who really let you down, who slap you in the face, who actually are hurting you and your ability to love music. I hate what I do not understand, and inexorably I’ve scoured the online accounts to try to understand what people like about this album.

That same silent Sunday drive, I was hungover with loss. “Maybe at the end of the year everyone will jump out with confetti and yell, ‘surprise! We actually didn’t like Merriweather at all,’ and I can feel sane again.” It will be like an inverse judgment day, a sudden stark contrast to who was in on the joke and who was just following the rules they knew to follow, the 9.6’s, the blogosphere. Nick Sylvester’s Hipster Runoff/Animal Collective post on RiffMarket, which had me totally shook up by the end and to which I will refer probably multiple times here, emphasized that Mark Richardson was an extremely talented writer, a visceral listener (me too), and apparently “seems incapable of liking something ironically.” For the most part I agree, but review length should be logarhythmic when you get into the 9’s, and that review was bare-bones, almost forced, like how Erin told me that the worst thing about music criticism was faking enthusiasm for something that was reductively “good.” Worse, Nick seemed to read my conspiratorial thoughts, assuring that “[Ryan and Scott] know the site doesn’t exist in a vacuum. They are extremely cautious of their own influence.”

Rachel’s got a more delightful version: as per the banal “grill talk” lyrics – which I’ll get into later – Animal Collective have actually made an indefatigable concept album about the modern world, like the now-30 members of Animal Collective standing in Times Square or something, all the crazed images and advertisements flying about their heads. Now there’s a ray of hope, but I think it was tapped on Strawberry Jam for me. And it doesn’t resolve the fact that surely most people, including noble Mark Richardson, are more drawn to the strobe-images in the background.

I need to prove to myself it’s not hard to admit that I dislike this album so much because so many others love it. There’ve gotta be economic principles, psychological reasons for this. It’s just the nature of dislike. Quick! Who’s worse, Ann Coulter or the guy on a soap box in NYC saying the same things? I’d be visceral until I petered out if I liked this album, but to tackle a monster seems to require something else entirely.

*          *            *

For those tickled by eschatology, there’s a theory in the philosophical school of parallelism that our Minds (as distinct from our brains) and our Bodies both exist but do not interact with each other. Deterministic chemistry, the first law of thermodynamics, everything that neuroscientists know about the brain forbids that the soul and the brain ever actually touch: hence, meta-physics. In the mold of those eerie hypothetical situations that tend to pop up in introductory courses in metaphysics (the famous one being a “transporter” that clones you instantly at a different location and vaporizes the original), is it even possible to picture a world in which our Minds (read: Souls) were removed, but somehow everyone continues living exactly the same as before? Baudrillard’s “The Anorexic Ruins” mentions this sort of apocalypse without finality or revelation, an apocalypse which we’ve already passed without knowing it. I’m picturing Liz’s film again, the completely detached way “Brother Sport” emanated from those speakers, the inarticulable loneliness this stuff makes me feel. Sure, we age, we get boring, nostalgia is at the root of happiness too much of the time, and yet somehow it seems more accurate, it’s more tempting to think that something at a certain point was actually lost.

Of course, if the parallelist millenarians are correct, if we really could continue exactly the same without the effect of soul, there wouldn’t be anything in MPP to suggest it. There wouldn’t be anything audible, visible, tangible to show for it. That’s a personal and universal horror, I need a locus.

*          *            *

A Guinean drummer named Amadou stayed at the farm Rachel & I worked on this summer for a few weeks. He tended to ramble, loving the role of the mystic even when he was really in the end just talking about Marley and pot, but one thing in particular that he said stood out: where he grew up, different tribes could be distinguished by their own unique drum patterns, the closest thing to as rich an evocation I can access being the use of drums as military organization during the Civil War.

What, then, do we make of the apparently universally agreed upon adjective “Afro-Brazilian” to describe the percussion (it really has just as much to do with vowelage) in “Brother Sport”? Shit’s smeary. Nothing could be more symbolic than that hyphen, drawing together two opposite ends of the globe and tying a bow around it. I was in the “World” workgroup at my radio station, and the greatest common ground any of us could find was that we hated that miserable, meaningless stamp. We were repeatedly given the same vinyl copy of David Lee Roth’s Eat ‘Em and Smile to listen to. This is the Us and Them ethos of Western culture, and we want to pretend that a song like “Brother Sport” represents some sort of unity that you don’t get in a Ten Thousand Villages.

The problem is, “Afro-Brazilian” production relies on complete ignorance of the signified. I wouldn’t play Animal Collective for Amadou, obviously – it’s built exclusively for the millions riding subways every day with escapist buds stuffed in their ears, a sorta lax free-floating and yes, acontextual music environment. It’s also a trusting one: even in my own home I kept thinking people were entering the room or objects were flying at my head. My final paper in Postmodern Literary Theory rated a slough of albums based on a dice roll, and then constructed a day of moments that would perfectly color the albums with those ratings. Lemme see… I think the most pertinent one would be the review of the Ruby Suns’ Sea Lion.

New Zealand’s The Ruby Suns are one of the recent groups that ride the tide of ethnically-influenced-but-not-actually-ethnic musicians, but it would be a mistake to call their insinuated World music – a nominally troublesome genre unto itself – a form of respect or a celebration of diversity à la Graceland. Instead, the group taps cultural tropes (various accents, proper nouns like “Mojave”, Afro-beat rhythms, flamenco guitar, indigenous folk harmonies) in order to feed their unobjectionable and near-uniform psychedelic slush. The album’s excessive arrangements bleed into one another and end up masking their deceptively simple musical ideas, which only show through when the band ceases its autopilot onslaught (as on bare-bones “There Are Birds”). It’s pleasing to believe that other cultures are this easy to enjoy, but what the listener ends up enjoying is the standard overproduced offshoot of “freak-folk” that’s emblematic of the decade. And their version of cultural diversity is only marginally less tacky than any globalization-born postcard that asks, “Kenya Dig It?” Rating: 6.2

So what triggers these kitsch-tinted goggles? Well Starbucks, of course, just like how seeing a Zach Braff movie (understuffed generalization, but a meme nonetheless) might cheapen, say, Rogue Wave, through sheer sonic association. I know that I can’t make any claim to the sort of sophisticated Anthropological knowledge (if even that comes close) that would allow me to even grasp the history and sheer kind of listening that Amadou was talking about, but one of the elements central to the “sound” of the decade is reckless exoticism, a sense that those who delight most in the “Afro-Brazilian” couldn’t give less of a shit that specific drum patterns are used to mark tribes.

*          *            *

That’s right fuckers! I’m not talking about the album! I’m talking the movement. The album’s just a paragon, an Enough-Is-Enough. Because, as Hipster Runoff rightly points out, Animal Collective are emblematic of what fame actually means in the so-called Information Era, which, along with their perfectly proportioned career arc, makes them candidates for Band of the Decade to at least the cultural surveyor, which I might be if I weren’t so goddamned misanthropic. For Pleogasm I actually encouraged Liz to write a compare/contrast between MPP and Animal Collective’s 2000 debut, Spirit They’re Gone, Spirit They’ve Vanished under the name Avey Tare and Panda Bear (they’re the only ones who played on Sung Tongs anyway), because they’re bookends about as different as you can possibly imagine, unsettling in totally diametric ways. Spirit for its intricacy and density of songs despite simplicity and lightness of layering, and MPP for the opposite, I guess. Somehow, as Sylvester says, “People know they're experimental musicians. There's very little burden on Animal Collective to prove that anymore. When you're young and in you're in New York, it's like, time to blow some motherfucking minds here.” And they did: Spirit is so totally forgotten, had so little influence on anyone at all, that every fragment of its almost minimalist production comes off as totally inventive. Back when, say, Panda Bear wasn’t just criticspeak for “loopy,” “Beach Boysy,” the Paul to Avey’s Lennon and whatnot, he was actually just a drummer. And a serpentine one at that, brushes in both hands with a shapeshifting momentum that evokes the fusiform percussion of a Raga without effectively sampling it – meaning that’s the sort of leap that I’m proud to make as a writer and half the people who hear the album won’t know why the fuck I’d associate the two. (I’m not instilling the music critic with some sort of superhuman authority here, I’m just asking, as someone who just likes responding to music with words, that critics make associations that listeners couldn’t make for themselves – contrary to the retrogressive “Afro-Brazillian.”)

Avey’s at the helm, kicking the album off with trebly, nauseous feedback that plays with its own persistence, deliberately tests if you’re ready for the rest of the album, and yes, blows your fucking mind/ “their load” (Liz again). If everyone lost their souls in the year 2000, you might say Spirit was the millennium’s last gasp, the brains painted on Avey’s wall. I want to go back to this beginning and call it Animal Collective’s moment, because indebted to the pastoral beauty of Feels as I am, it just doesn’t seem to matter anymore, Feels is too middle ground to choose a side, or worse, people see it as their turning point into denser production. I call it measured restraint vs. excess, but OK. It does sport their absolute best drone track, “Banshee Beat,” which takes so long – two and a half minutes – to move from its first guitar note that the first chord change earns itself one of the best moments in Animal Collective’s catalogue. (Compare with the ignition of “Daily Routine,” the most precise development of a sound that we get on this whole album, a 20-second to 180bpm acceleration – am I buying a car here?) Something seemed distinct there, when Animal Collective were trying to make “complete” albums that covered lots of different ground. The change is completely apparent in the consistently 4-6 minute lengths of the 12 tracks on MPP, a too-common album type I usually liken to a sack of bricks. If they cover ground, they try to cover it simultaneously, which is why “No More Runnin” is not a drone song, “Bluish” is not a love song, “My Girls” is not a snappy pop song, and “Brother Sport” is not a fucking “Afro-Brazilian” song.

*          *           

That fucking album cover. I’m sorry, I know it seems totally cursory, and the upgrade from single-bullet-point defense of the music object to a broader analysis far in the future, but it gives me the creeps in a way sort of perfectly analogous to the album itself. It’s like an infuriatingly clever popup in itself (you know, one of those that quilts the page with the X bouncing maniacally through its links), it writhes for attention as you scroll by it, which you can be sure a lot of people are going to be doing come EOY/EOD mania. More than anything else, more than substance, more than aesthetics, that cover is a trick; elusive, confusing to the senses but never actually interesting or more than a repeated pattern. Coldly scientific in its self-assurance. I don’t usually comment on album titles or album art because it seems too easy a launching pad, but in this case I think the cover is conspicuously, qualitatively different from all the other postage-stamp artwork you see online. Animal Collective have always had fucked up album covers, but MPP’s iconic ubiquity is by far the scariest – if we’re to forgive as much as Rachel is tempted to, we might call it a meta-Orwellian internet installation piece: look, no one actually looks at what’s being portrayed, humanity’s sacrificed art and submitted itself to gridlike patterns. Call it an adaptation to the internet era, a reaction to what album art actually means these days, but as a fogey and idealist, art doesn’t seem like it ought to need to adapt – I think of business models, I think of Darwinism, I think of the almost pre-societal anarchy that the internet models with its traps, scavengers and viruses, its pack mentality and now its faceless dictators.

*          *            *

RiffMarket notwithstanding, I enjoyed Charles Aaron’s post comparing Animal Collective to Moby. Does anyone think about the future of Animal Collective? Where can they go from here? (Hush, I know about standard post-album BP Fall Be Kind). With MPP they’ve eliminated the entire notion of albums as categories of sound, and have essentially become the best through their own production monopoly. Their only option, besides going doomy (like Embryonic) or faux-fi, and the most likely choice, is to recreate MPP until everyone realizes their own mistake. Moby’s Play came out in 1999 to instantaneous acclaim (winning the 1999 Pazz and Jop) and just barely less instantaneous surfeit. The end of a decade is a time when a lot of critics are looking to define it, and Play seemed the perfect candidate to demonstrate the growth of what people were still calling “techno” at the time, most notably the use of sampled gospel and soul phrases, acknowledging “electronica's often-overlooked African-American roots,” inclusion, inclusion, inclusion.

I like listening to Moby’s Play occasionally, because of its own anachronism. Like, you can feel just how cool Moby thought the whole endeavor was, never knowing that Kanye West, for example, would do infinitely more complex work with some samples but mostly actual live recordings so tied to their own history (well, how the hell do I know – ft. Jamie Foxx instead of sampling Ray Charles, even he’s gained a certain turtleneck notoriety) that they reveal Moby for exactly what he was: a scrawny nerd with a vague familiarity with R&B who saw the potential for computers to juxtapose threads of culture that realistically couldn’t stand each other. (I hate to get too processualist, but the fact that Paul Simon actually got Ladysmith Black Mambazo in the same recording studio really does matter). Gospel techno never, therefore, took off, and Moby is forever relegated to self-parody – like there’s pretty much nothing he could do to be relevant any more, Play completed all that was possible. Play and Merriweather, therefore, don’t sound one bit alike, but they both tap into the same ersatz Utopian belief that juxtaposing through technology and packaging together is the same thing as real unity. Play was too prophetic for its own good, but in one of its first acts of outrageous cooler-than-thouism, Pitchfork dumped a 5.0 on it, speaking in clean universals:

The sampling and processing of passionate folk and blues roots music drains whatever emotional ballast kept the music so spiritually afloat; although, this is more of the fault of innate digital recording techniques than Moby's talent. A performance loses raw magnetism after being chopped up in ProTools, cut from its atmosphere, cleaned, and gutted from its accompanying guitar. After this process, the blues on Play become nothing more than a quirky sample.

“Innate” is key; nowhere does it admit that there was a tipping point for density, sound quality or attention-deficit at which it would suddenly become more compelling or more real. The naughts didn’t agree with Brent DiCrescenzo on that one, though Play sure ended up in a lot of used CD bins. Children of the digital era, Animal Collective don’t have to worry about that, at least.

*          *            *

Animal Collective are remarkable in that they’ve reached the point of being – at least for one or two albums – a group that I would have called “freak folk,” all acoustic guitars and bongos, now creating totally electronic music. Even if Panda Bear’s responsible for the rhythm, which I doubt even, he certainly isn’t the drummer any more: the beat is almost unilaterally a bass-heavy 4/4 throb, like AC knew Aaron wasn’t going to be the only one thinking of “throw[ing] a way outer-borough warehouse party where we'd get some cool-ass young DJ (like James Murphy's current weed carrier) to spin and rewind and cut/mash up Merriweather Post Pavillion for, like, 10 hours straight (some insane Danny Tenaglia, where-we-gettin'-brunch? marathon) backed by, say, the best visual extravaganza you could finagle from a Pratt Institute Digital Arts major.” Meaning, no one’s attached to these particular arrangements at all, they feel off-the-cuff and of-the-moment. The closest thing to “meticulous” in this album’s construction is that it probably has more discrete (if only, though) sounds in it than any other album in existence. They constructed it by sitting down, day in and day out, sending octaves through as many different pedals as they could and recording eight beats of each, and storing it in a huge file somewhere. But like DJs, they might as well have arranged it in real time, one hour-long party where they clicked, dragged, looped and muted as many different things at once (under the guise of experimentalism, they rarely correspond specifically to chords, but moreover they know how to make their loops universalized, like those preprogrammed ones on Garage Band) all piled on top of the most lamely tautological songs they’ve written. Like, no shit “Bluish” was a weird target for Mach I, because when you listen to the album its “organ” is the most distinct melody up to that point.

Matt R expressed this concern: “I don’t know how everyone immediately decided that these songs are all better than all the ones they’ve done before,” and the answer is, they didn’t. We’ve thrown up our hands and we’re in the post-song era; as Everett pointed out, Western harmonic variety necessarily depletes (to say nothing of the even-easier pentatonic scale – go pound some black keys and you’ll see what I mean) while technology exponentiates. This was fascinating listening to alternate “Strawberry Fields Forever” mixes on the Beatles Anthology, for example. But there’s a paradox here, a la the warehouse party: the density of loops could be any density of loops. Put simply, you could hit “shuffle” on every motherfucking layer of this album and it would still be recognizable as the same album. Parallel universe time, it would actually be received the same way. I thought everyone took that for granted with Jam, but MPP being the album that “consolidates” their various strengths (you’ve got that fucking right) it’s abundantly clear that they’re King of the Castle because of quantity, not quality.

Is that so fucking “modernist” of me to say, that Animal Collective could destroy the entire thrill that a music fan gets at knowing something’s carefully made? I just don’t want to get into that old mo/pomo argument, because I think anyone who adamantly defends either ends up sounding like an idiot. Which is why MPP cannot be a law for me, even if other musicians treat it as such. Only the sort of asymptote that time will shit upon.

*          *            *

Postmodernism is funny, and by that I don’t just mean “strange and worth talking about,” I mean if you understand where it rears its head, it’s a mischievous and delightful exercise in bubble-bursting. That’s also the reason that when it’s anyone’s honest philosophic axis, it becomes annoying, hopeless, and/or nihilistic. Considering I’ve been discussing the DJ connection, there’s an interesting comparison to make with Girl Talk, whose agenda of unity is purely observational. Rachel’s “we’ve gotten to a point where everything can collapse across time and space,” or, “holy shit, ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ has the same chord progression as that one Boston song,” was one critic’s interior monologue. When Greg Gillis compiles so many individuals into a single unit, he pokes fun at all of their egos, virtually enslaves them to the broad swirling circle of pop music. For Girl Talk, there’s no longer any singularity, whereas for Animal Collective, the entire project is in the name of their own singularity – at the expense of the entire history of music! Let’s get back to that dead horse: Animal Collective rely on people getting a rush from “recognizing” Afro-Brazilian percussion the same way they do from recognizing a song from their youth. Second to this, but not that close and a bit of a critic bone-throw, is relying that sequencers that sound like they were just left on in the background will evoke, if you’re as savvy as I am, “minimalism,” which a lot of people say is pasty Classical’s last gasp, or the criticspeak equivalent which is “Philip Glass” or “Steve Reich” depending on how incessant it is. The shorter critics’ reviews become (here’s looking at you, Rolling Stone) the more their language seems to set perpetual cultural wheels in motion – the easier to slap “Philip Glass” and “Afro-Brazilian” in the same review, the easier it is for the subject itself to integrate the two. That’s why anyone who writes about music has a duty to rave. The duty to rant is something that I’m always questioning.

*          *            *

The most kindling for Rachel’s “concept album” proposition is the lyrics for this album, which are usually almost painfully simple and poorly written, coping with their own disillusionment and getting bored by their own optimism. Nick again: “MPP is struggling with growing old and out of touch and losing your ability to love music and be hit by it and want everyone in the whole goddamn world to hear it because you fundamentally believe that if everyone hears this album, maybe the world will be a better place.” So even though I don’t think I’ve ever heard an album more obsessed with its own ladder of success, I call up the lyrics to “Lion in a Coma,” snickering at the double-underlined link on the word “merchandise.” And, no shit:

Is there no reason it can't be the way it was, music and me?

My three best friends so casually just letting go so joyfully

But if I let my wrist get tired, but if I let my spirit cry out

There'll always be that fear of dying or is it just trying to divide?

It makes me think my dearest things are not what they're supposed to be

I trick myself when it is hard, I've got to keep up, oh my god

And hope that I will not be wrong and keep my faith inside a song

And we'll make up 'morrow, which reminds me not to leave them back inside

Cut to me playing “Winter Wonder Land” for Matt R, saying “there are actually a few good melodies on this album,” but as soon as it starts Matt is incredulous. “I feel like when I’m older, I’m going to listen to this and think what the fuck was I on?” He could’ve explained further, but I understand all too well. I understand it better any time I leave the room with this album on and hear nothing but a pulse and soft, confused clutter, then walk back in. There is a really just incredibly miniscule library that I found when I was stuck in Lodi again, and they recently decided that it would attract more youth if they set up a Wii in the back room. It was a completely insane sphere of noise and sound, of course, the sort of thing we’re all somehow so good at ignoring nowadays, if we aren’t participating.

Everett told me about two movies he’d seen almost back-to-back: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. In the former, “they spent twenty minutes washing the dishes. Twenty minutes. I timed it. Then I saw Indiana Jones and it was just relentless scorpions and snakes flying all over the place…” Everett is detached enough to have a certain incredulity about it.

It makes me nervous that everyone else is so nervous about Time. Time is the greatest limiting factor. This is such a truism that it almost goes without saying. Almost.

And there’s so much talk about how MPP is popular despite being a “progressive” album. “Progressive” used to usually mean it needed to take significantly more time for the many ideas to unfold. You needed to trust the music, to some extent. Animal Collective make no presumptions of trust, of having earned anything over the course of their storied careers. They don’t lay out their ideas horizontally, they construct them vertically, in teleological skyscrapers, knowing that for so many people a few seconds per song is all that they have. Pop music is differentiated from other art because of its nostalgia-building repetition – traditionally, we play records over and over, we come to love every element. But this, the new prog, this is the best anyone can cling to nowadays, they can replay it like they can revisit malls, because they will always find more. From the outside it all looks the same, how much of a Luddite you are just depends on where you draw the line. Eventually, if you spend enough time with your own balms, you come to find it hurtful, sickening, angering.

And that’s all that it comes down to: my own visceral reaction. For all my talk of culture, it’s really difficult to grasp what MPP means or how it fits into most people’s lives. I can choose not to go to the mall, but MPP is penetrating structures that I care about, it’s penetrating people that I care about, and if I could only receive just one revelation about it, something that I didn’t somehow know already despite my already-infinite ignorance, I could forgive it. We’ll see how retrospect treats it; if it really is like Kid A or Portishead’s Third, if it really is about the endurance, or lack thereof, of the soul despite a harrowing modern world, then it could receive a check mark for the most terrifyingly accurate portrait of that modern world that I’ve ever experienced – accurate enough to be absorbed into it, accurate enough even to create it, accurate enough to avoid. “Am I really all the things that are outside of me?” Avey Tare asks in “Taste.” We’ll leave that unanswered for now, but it sure seems so. >> ●

FTR: Avey Tare and Panda Bear - Spirit They're Gone, Spirit They've Vanished (Animal, 2000) 9; Here Comes the Indian (Paw Tracks, 2003) K; Campire Songs - Campfire Songs (Catsup Plate, 2003) K; Sung Tongs (FatCat, 2004) 8; Panda Bear - Young Prayer (Paw Tracks, 2004) 8; Feels (FatCat, 2005) 8.5; Panda Bear - Person Pitch (Paw Tracks, 2007) 8; Strawberry Jam (Domino, 2007)

 


Posted by enigmatichowler at 11:27 AM EDT
Updated: Sunday, January 10, 2010 10:48 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
The Craazy World of Academia

The following two pieces were written for college courses, but both pertain to pop music and the theory/culture surrounding it, so I figured why falsely put up a barrier between my academic life and my blog persona? I almost answered, because when I write academically it's often inaccessibly stuffy, but then I realized that I actually abandoned the idea of a regular blog audience long ago. The first, a trend piece about ratings (supplies!) for a writing about the arts course, (the Times New Viking review was also for this one) should actually ideally be my most accessible writing on this blog in years. The second, not so much maybe, but it discusses a certain theory of how to convey what something sounds like that I've sorta accidentally incorporated from the beginning. One friend read my Cake review years ago and noted that I seemed to slip into assonance and alliteration when I got on a roll even back then. Why for comparative literature? Well Holmes, turns out Comp. Lit isn't only cross-cultural but cross-medium. Yeah, when I heard that I almost changed majors until I realized I haven't spoken a word of shitty french since 10th grade. Why do I always want to unveil with a "without further ado"? If you didn't want further ado you'd skip this drivel! I just need a place to put a colon:


Numbness and Numbers

(Originally written for Writing About the Arts with Anne Trubek, May 2008)

When the spaztronica duo Matmos performed at the Pitchfork Music Festival in July 2006, member Drew Daniel followed their rendition of “L.A.S.I.K.” with a few biting words. “You liked that one? Yeah, I think the album that was off got, like, an 8.6. …Let’s hear it for ratings!” A swell of boos rose from the tight-jeaned audience, but whether they liked it or not, that was arguably the ultimate reason many of them – not to mention the group itself – were there. They’d deny it vehemently, of course; Matmos, to them, was a sophisticated group, far above the shackles of even positive numerical valuation. But independent record store owners across the nation would agree that Matmos’ status was bestowed back in 2001 by the 8.8 (Daniel was wrong) stamped on A Chance to Cut is a Chance to Cure. Rating systems that guide consumer behavior have been around for a long time, but most recently the shepherds themselves are amok.

Case in point: the other day I was looking up Philip Larkin’s poem “The Mower” online, and a Google search brought me to PoemHunter.com, which has the full texts of almost 100 of Larkin’s poems. Given the broad selection, a Larkin neophyte might not have any clue where to begin. But to the neophyte’s relief, perhaps, every page on PoemHunter.com has a sidebar revealing (in the case of “The Mower”) an average score of 7.0 out of 10.0, based on 3 user ratings.

Taken on its own, this feature may seem bizarre and unnecessary, but for any frequent web peruser this sort of thing has crept up too steadily this past decade to actually be surprising. Now, anywhere there’s a choice about how to spend one’s valuable free time – say, trying to understand the deeper meaning of a poem – there’s almost invariably a little numerical stamp indicating whether it’s “worth it,” often to the hundredth level of detail. The PoemHunter.com sidebar barely even raises an eyebrow for presuming that, sans context, your average reader will know what a seven out of 10 means. It’s assumed that, steeped in quantitative opinions as we are, we’ve integrated these numbers into a sort of common vocabulary.

Of course the entire trend is, like so many other things, a direct consequence of file sharing. Back when consumers had to splurge on a leap of faith in order to get access to anything, they sure didn’t need to be convinced to spend a little bit of time reading the poems, watching the movie, listening to the music. There was a sense, long since passed, that the sheer financial investment of acquisition necessitated a degree of mental or emotional investment.

If anything, the rating system on PoemHunter.com is provocative because of the parallels it might draw with other more obviously surfeited art forms. For instance, discussions and debates over the Internet and music are nothing new, and sure enough, the explosion of numerical ratings has been most pronounced in the realm of online music criticism. At the top of the list is that site which The Chicago Sun-Times Jim DeRogatis calls one of “the most successful new publication[s] of the Internet era”: Pitchfork Media, whose founder Ryan Schreiber first implemented the brow-furrowingly specific 10.0-point rating scale over a decade ago. Last year, Blender named him the fifth most influential person in online music. It may have started as a half-joke, but the 10.0 rating scale has now becomes an internet cultural standard.

Call it a slew of imitators if you must, but our decade has seen the initiation of increasingly specific rating scales in so many different online publications – The Onion AV Club recently started tacking letter grades onto the end of their reviews, and Prefix upped their scale from 5 “diamonds” to 10 points in 0.5 increments – that sites such as Dusted which remain prose-only appear to be “sticking to their guns.” It’s unlikely that readers or staff writers are demanding the inclusion of ratings outright; the more likely explanation involves advertising. Online advertisers often pay based on hits per page rather than, say, the duration of visits to a page. They see the effects of advertisements as instantaneous. And ratings are too: they encourage readers to make quick stops to several review pages instead of reading/dwelling upon only one or two. The inclusion of ratings becomes a direct source of revenue. But money’s not all that’s at stake here; record storeowners cite a direct correlation between consumer purchases and Pitchfork’s tastemaking ratings.

Print publications in the age of the Internet have struggled to keep up given the online competition. Spin and Alternative Press have been continually turning over their system of rating scales to determine what is the most marketable. They’ve both most recently settled on star-scales, which show quantity visually, over single characters (B+, etc.) You could put on goggles smeared with Vaseline and still point to the albums they liked the most. And almost unilaterally, reviews are becoming shorter and shorter, to the point that every Rolling Stone review now has an emboldened fifteen-word “blurb” encapsulating an already sub-200-word sound bite. It’s been a long time since most print reviews were considered a form of true-blooded journalism, or cultural literature.

At the same time, some print publications are avoiding the condensing reforms, ostensibly because they’re resistant to considering themselves even part of the same “market” as e-zines. There may be some truth to this: at a recent talk, Washington Post book critic Michael Dirda described a fundamental difference in the way the two are read. “People read the internet for information,” he said, and the implication was that online writing is rarely given the time and attention that printed writing might. A few magazines, such as The Wire and Magnet, have refused to publish their reviews online because it would deemphasize the print copy itself. Still more publications are shrink-wrapping every issue, because the ratings and blurbs have made it too easy for bookstore passers-by of the internet generation to flip through an issue for a quick recommendation or two.

Recommendations rarely indulge in the positive-negative review binary any more, even though it is as old as written criticism itself. The appeal of numerical ratings, then, is that it lets the reader choose his or her own “thumbs up” and “thumbs down” threshold value. The drawback, perhaps, is that the process of finding new music involves coming to grips with the patterns of one’s own taste.

For my own example, I would probably check out a band that Pitchfork has reviewed at a 7.5 if, in my typically quick scan in the morning (I’d defend my honor here, but research shows I’m not the only one), I see certain key phrases such as “drone” or “organs.” Experience says these elements lower my personal “threshold.” If, on the other hand, it’s a hip-hop release, I’m not liable to pay much attention unless it graces the 9.0+ slot. The more of a genre niche a site has carved out for itself (Pitchfork used to be pretty much straight indie rock, and their diversification is actually frustrating to some) the less work in the process of deciding what to seek out. And some publications like Tiny Mix Tapes simplify the reader’s scan by providing a header listing genres and bands that sound similar. NYC-based magazine The Deli even pairs reviews with little symbolic food morsels representing “prime NYC music” (a Warhol banana) or “lo-fi” (a hot dog).

This does suggest that perhaps a bit more than just straight numbers are important to readers, but at the same time readers generally aren’t demanding sophisticated analysis either. After all, it’s a familiarity with these key phrases that makes the phrases helpful in pigeonholing bands. It recalls nothing so much as the online automated jukebox Pandora’s barebone encapsulations of different pop music patterns. Type in “The Cranberries” and they play a song by Sixpence None that their own observations and research show listeners will probably like. And if you ask, they’ll say it up front too: “Based on what you’ve told us so far, we’re playing this track because it features pop rock qualities, a subtle use of vocal harmony, mild rhythmic syncopation, mixed acoustic and electric instrumentation and major key tonality.” Inside their music database, Pandora has a laundry list of these sorts of elements, and the theory is if you isolate enough of them, you’ll have a music fan “figured out.” If their site’s success counts for anything, they’re onto something.

Even though critics are liable to rely on similar principles when they write reviews, their entire job relies on an assumed disdain for the likes of Pandora. One Pitchfork writer I corresponded with alluded to what he called the “shameless press-kit regurgitation” in many reviews for the last album by Grandaddy. Words that elicit a knee-jerk response from a certain demographic have always been part of the central dogma of marketing. But sophisticated (read: surprising) writing and analysis arguably doesn’t operate on the assumption that new music is wholly derivative, so the demand for the shorthand aspect of reviews is as unhelpful to the idea of cultural development as it is helpful to fans eager to absorb as much as they can.

Pandora, in other words, is a wonderful tool for anyone who simply wants to hear more, but that’s a double-edged sword. The patterns the site reveals can sometimes be staggering: I never would have guessed, for example, just how many obscure groups sound nigh-on identical to the group Stereolab before I used Pandora. Anyone who’s been in a position receiving promotional materials from record labels also understands the insurmountable volume of music being made today. It’s enough to make anyone numb.

This all relates to a surprisingly pervasive (test it) economic principle of human behavior: the law of diminishing marginal utility. Bear with me. The basic idea is that the more of a commodity a consumer has access to, the less value (utility) will be attached to gaining more. So it’s unsurprising that in their study of “Beauty in the eye of the expert and nonexpert beholder,” Hekkert and Van Wieringen found a higher correlation between judgments of “originality” and “quality” for art experts compared to nonexperts. For those with access, music that seems particularly good becomes rarer and rarer, as does music that seems particularly bad. The more of an “expert” a critic is, the more likely the “thumbs up/thumbs down” paradigm will be met by a bewildered shrug. This is why quantitative ratings as a rule favor the middle.

Ted Gioia, who founded the extensive review site Jazz.com, used this pattern to justify his own 100-point scale. “In practice, reviewers almost never use the top end or low end of any scale – so most reviews are crammed together in the three star or four star range. It’s hard to see what use that is to anyone. I wanted a range with room for more nuance and subtle gradations.” Readers are allured by hyper-specific ratings because they either are or want to be consuming at this level, where “great” music is as scarce as it needs to be to provide enjoyment.

“Scarcity” is itself a key economic principle, and one that an introductory economics course will tell you is best represented by price. But this is different in the case of mass-produced art, which (besides books) is generally emblematic of the 20th century – CDs, DVDs, heck, even Klimt posters in dorm rooms. Music began as entirely performance-oriented, existing as a product only in the ephemeral form of operas and classical performances. With the advent of recording technology, however, no one thought to limit pressings, and voila! Price became inelastic, or stable, and competition became “product differentiation oriented.” In his book Critics, Ratings and Society: The Sociology of Reviews (2007), Grant Blank argues that reviews came to serve the purpose that price normally would. Music is one of “a number of product categories where price does not supply useful information,” according to Blank. “Deprived of useful price information, audiences use reviews to help them make decisions about these products. Because price is irrelevant, reviews are important.”

The music-internet crisis takes the entire issue a step further, especially on college campuses. Besides the not-yet-defunct Napster spinoffs like Limewire, programs such as Shakespeer and DC++ utilize college networks to provide movies and music upon request within a few seconds. Online, sites like The Hype Machine and Elbo.ws interconnect blogs that post mp3s under an easy search function, and with some high-profile artists entire albums can easily be tracked down. Access, in other words, is no longer a small issue of spending a few bucks; it’s a non-issue. If we’re still to call free-downloaders “consumers,” the thing they’re spending isn’t money, it’s time.

Which isn’t without its value, it’s important to note. Word of mouth has a significant value, in determining concert attendance but especially in determining sales through allegiance. In 2002, Wilco’s Yankee Hotel Foxtrot became a top-10 hit arguably because they had provided it free over the internet for several months. The group Animal Collective actually publicly supported the leak of their most recent album, Strawberry Jam, and expressed concerns only that it hadn’t leaked in its entirety. Above all, MySpace demonstrates independent artists’ willingness to get their music out there simply to make a name for themselves, if not a fortune. Consumers, especially of independent music, still like to show their financial support when they can, even if there is a cheaper shortcut. Of course, no argument can maintain that the industry is capable of supporting itself with extensive illegal downloading opportunities in place. Ours is an age in which musicians can become heroes or gods overnight and scarcely make a dime.

The notion of sacralization of art is not itself new – museums have the idea built in to their very existence – but the vanishing economic ties and resulting abundance of both artists and reviewers calls the possibility for cultural “consecration” into question. In Vaughn Schmutz’s article “Retrospective Cultural Consecration in Popular Music” in American Behavioral Scientist, he identifies critics as “agents of the dominant class” and “reputational entrepreneurs.” Their job is to “set sacred cultural producers and products apart from their profane counterparts.” Interestingly, he considered the ultimate musical consecration to be Rolling Stone’s in/famous list of the 500 Greatest Albums of All Time.

Blank maintains a distinction between connoisseurial reviews (a lone expert’s opinion) and procedural reviews (a large number of consumers rating objectively, like the Zagat restaurant survey), but what we see on the Internet makes the distinction a tenuous one. If the Ryan Schreiber interviews about Pitchfork’s origins could be summarized with a theme, it would be that anyone can start a website out of their basement that people will read. It has been proven time and time again with spinoff sites: to name the most high-profile and music-oriented, Prefix, Tiny Mix Tapes, Coke Machine Glow, Stylus, Lost at Sea and PopMatters are all similar in both format and content.

For most if not all of these sites, contributor payment is limited to the promotional materials from record labels. Alternative Press Editor-In-Chief Jason Pettigrew even has a name for these barely-employees: “promosexuals,” who will give a terrible album three stars just to remain on the record label’s mailing list. And marketing literature is meticulously arranged by labels with the hope that critics will engage in the aforementioned “press-kit regurgitation.” Blank is fascinated with this assumed credibility of criticism, and one foundational anecdote involves a software company president bemoaning an unfactual review: “The reality is that when there is a conflict between our literature and the review, people probably believe the review.” This is why “RIYL: Iron and Wine”-style advertising is aimed more at potential critics than consumers themselves.

One can see why certain conceptions about the Rock Critic might be called into question these days. Are the writers for these sites fundamentally different from someone you might find offering up their opinion for free on Amazon.com? Could they be even less credible than the popularly-voted “Top 1000 Reviewers” on Amazon.com? These demi-procedural reviews are even more common than critical ratings. The site RateYourMusic.com encourages its members to enter their entire music collections with scores, and RateItAll.com’s premise is self-explanatory. In fact, a recent study showed that fully 26% of all adults in America have cast numerical votes online, the largest education group being college students and the largest age group 18-27 year olds.

But sites that compile critics’ opinions, like Metacritic.com, RottenTomatoes.com and AcclaimedMusic.net, best illustrate the blurring of the line between consumer and critic. Each one takes a huge number of reviews and compresses them into a composite score or ranking. The idea is to get a handle on a sort of “critical consensus,” but a closer look, particularly of Rotten Tomatoes, reveals quite the opposite. The site is devoted to translating many binary opinions into a single quantitative one –  i.e., 53% of critics said this was good, so 47% must have said it was bad – which assumes that there will be an interesting degree of disagreement between critics. Unlike the case of Metacritic, which plugs in numbers for each critic even if they didn’t provide one, a 53 on Rotten Tomatoes always presents the reviews as mixed, not mediocre.

Some critics (especially at Coke Machine Glow) have actually started treating Metacritic as the focus of the review, possibly because a large portion of their readership found out about the site through Metacritic. One reviewer went so far as to ask Metacritic to put down “what they said” as their blurb on Metacritic’s list of review snippets. More recently, there’s been a delayed backlash to albums that are successful on Metacritic: this year Pitchfork gave extremely low scores to albums by Bell X1 and Dengue Fever long after the “results were in,” and Coke Machine Glow did the same with the metal band Protest the Hero. This suggests that sites are less interested in being autonomous entities as they are in casting votes in a broad network called the “critical community.”

People do trust Pitchfork partially because they historically haven’t let themselves become subject to rating inflation (this may be starting to change). The last time they gave a 10.0 to an album upon release was Wilco’s Yankee Hotel Foxtrot which, as I’ve mentioned, was available online long enough before official release for Pitchfork to determine significant “retrospective consecration.” And given the number of reviews they publish (five per weekday), the ratings’ level of detail almost makes sense beyond geek appeal. The cluster of reviews around the 6.5-7.3 range create a sense that the music they review falls upon a sort of perfect bell curve of quality. But since they still refrain from publishing reviews of 99% of the promos they receive, that bell curve has to be completely imported.

What the unidimensional rating scales really fail to convey is the fundamental difference between a positive and negative review: profile. By and large, the “point” of a positive review is to say that an album is or might be underappreciated, and Pettigrew calls the point of a negative review “to maintain a dialogue, or discussion” – which doesn’t occur for groups that no one is promoting. Sure, in Pitchfork’s eye, no band is untouchable, and readers still brace themselves for when traditional darlings like Animal Collective and Radiohead might get a 6.7 (which could be a somewhat positive review for a “nobody”) dropped on their new album. At the same time, the cliché for Radiohead reviews in the past eight years has been “I can’t say anything about this band that hasn’t already been said.” Radiohead, in some sense, doesn’t bear defending.

And in the same way, day-to-day crap doesn’t bear shooting down. Without her lo-fi classic Exile in Guyville as a distant predecessor, Liz Phair’s self-titled album in 2003 wouldn’t have gotten the 0.0 “bomb” dropped on it and probably wouldn’t have been reviewed at all. The 4.0 review given to And You Will Know Us By The Trail of Dead’s Worlds Apart directly discusses it in the context of the 10.0 status bestowed upon its predecessor Source Tags & Codes. Even if sites that employ ratings treat the terrible as if it were scarce in the same way the great is, they are actually judged by diametrically opposite criteria.

In Blank’s discussion of Chicago magazine’s restaurant reviews, which use a five-star system similar to other restaurant reviews in which every rating is positive, he treats ratings as the tip of a hierarchical pyramid. “A certain logic suggests that many cultural hierarchies resemble a pyramid. One reviewer said, ‘A memorable, excellent meal is unusual and very hard to do. As you go to fewer stars, meals become easier and less complex, and more restaurants can do them.’” The plain “any press is good press” treatment of restaurant reviews seems like a good system to eliminate perpetual straddling of the very real line between the positive and negative. It isn’t clear how a young band should react to a 6.3 review from Pitchfork, nor is it clear how much that benefits the culture, since there are apparently innumerable identical “6.3” groups everywhere. Unlike positive reviews, which must be stratified so that consumers can locate music they’ll enjoy, negative reviews can and should just be negative, because they’re different.

Interestingly, bound by their 100-percentage-point rating system though they are, Coke Machine Glow seems to be employing this division between hierarchical positive reviews and flat negative reviews. Most of their reviews wobble around the 78-82% range (the equivalent of maybe 1 star, or “Good,” in a restaurant review) and they’ll periodically drop a bold 45% or 30% on their own version of overhyped drivel. As one impassioned negative review of Razorlight’s Up All Night touted, “No one’s going to angrily crucify Jimmy Eat World, no matter how low they push emo’s common denominator, because though Jimmy Eat World roundly suck, they suck without pretension to being anything more than they are: a rote emo band.” Coke Machine Glow has also employs other “discussion” features, one of which has also been explored by Under the Radar: the “counterpoint,” which offers a different take on an album that’s already been reviewed. They also stage several reviews as literal dialogues between two of the writers.

This kind of complex interpretation and analysis is all increasingly interesting to those who have heard the album, and increasingly unhelpful to those who have not. It illuminates, once again, the problem between reading reviews as a sort of literature in themselves, and scanning them for information. Back in the glory days of music journalism, you could see pieces as passionate as Lester Bangs’ Astral Weeks review, which Coke Machine Glow cites as a chief inspiration. I read that particular review after I had already heard the album, and something very unusual and inspiring happened: the review instilled value to the album. There were certain phrases that stuck with me, such as, “Van Morrison is interested, obsessed with how much musical or verbal information he can compress into a small space, and, almost conversely, how far he can spread one note, word, sound, or picture. To capture one moment, be it a caress or a twitch.” It became impossible to mentally smooth over the album’s intricacies, as I had been.

So in addition to telling us what to listen to, reviews can tell us how to listen. It is a very different function of a review from the one to which we’ve been accustomed, especially now given the prevalence of ratings, and there’s an internal tension in many positive reviews between getting basic genre information out there and describing why it hits so hard. Numerical ratings and key phrases may seem to cheapen the analysis, but extracting them from the review completely may loosen up restrictions on the writing, partially because of the guarantee that the reader will read the piece for more than a few seconds. The now-defunct site Stylus had the right idea with its “On Second Thought” feature, in which reviewers put together their thoughts on a record “with the benefit of time.”

What it all boils down to is that reviews serve many purposes, and putting their different incarnations under the same heading and attaching the same scale to everything betrays this variety. Music criticism will become both more interesting and helpful if end this perpetual compromise, cut out the middle. Specific numerical ratings, key phrases, RIYLs, and brief summaries – all of which, really, can be done by Pandora or last.fm – should be associated with recommended underground groups and separated entirely to be gobbled up by blog-hoppers and DC++ frenetics. Sites can then, separately, produce creative and complex written analysis of the albums that everyone’s liable to download regardless, or at least under the assumption that the reader has heard the album.

So maybe the only reason a Phil Larkin poem receiving a 7.0 seems absurd is merely because of sample size, or the idea that in the adamantly canonized and consecrated field of literature one might sniff out new poets the way one does up-and-coming musicians. But there are plenty of poets: why not? In any case, ratings, whether arbitrary or not, remain extremely important to the idea that a broad range of the independent music being produced today ought to be heard and treated as “special.” They’re our generation’s way of reviving the concept of the musical legend, and updating it for an era in which otherwise there’s so much music that one often can’t help but lose faith in originality.


"Borderline-Onomatopoeiatic Language":  The Possibility of Accuracy in Music Translation

(Originally written for Intro to Comparative Literature with Jed Deppman, October 2007) 

Writing that pertains to music is anything but uncommon, but rarely will the analysts, commentators and critics refer to what they do as “translation.” This is perhaps because music, and most other art forms, are seen as non-linguistic; to suppose that any written piece simply “is” the same work as a musical piece in a different language ignores numerous issues of accuracy and creativity. Yet these issues, though perhaps exponentiated in significance, are echoed by critics of literary translation. I would argue, therefore, that the adventurous (and pompous) soul who “speaks the language of music” could produce a translation of a musical piece that would not raise fundamentally different objections from those to the current body of literary translations. Treating Edmund Wilson and Vladimir Nabokov as conceptual poles, I will address the near-crippling worry regarding music translation: that music does not have any meaning towards which the translator owes fidelity. By using my own translation of Four Tet’s “She Moves She” as a reference point (see appendix), I will argue that this meaning is at best skeletal to the crucial common thread between language and music: auditory aesthetics. Although issues of translation structure and layout complicate the problem, the phonetic potential of words is the key to bridging the aesthetic fissure between music and language.

Nabokov’s standard of “absolute exactitude” (134) is troubling mostly because of the characteristics sacrificed in its name. “The clumsiest literal translation,” he asserts, “is a thousand times more useful than the prettiest paraphrase” (127). That this might reduce the reader’s experience to a cold, non-aesthetic experience is, in his view, the price to be paid for accuracy. To that end, it could be argued that accuracy in music without heed to any degree of musicality would amount to a laundry-list of technical details: the key, the chords, the notes, the time signature, the instrumentation, the tonality – the list goes on. The extent to which these terms and ideas are unfamiliar to an audience might be analogous to Nabakov’s decidedly esoteric vocabulary. The problem with this notion is that musical vocabulary is not directly descriptive but rather an agreed set of metaphorical interpretations. Music is, after all, simply different vibrations of the air, and does not naturally lend itself to qualitative description. Much of musical vocabulary is not even English at all; notes are, at their most textual, given letters and generally represented in their own symbolic framework. Translation is distinct from transcription, and for this reason I minimized reference to any but the most necessary and important music theory jargon (“beat,” “arpeggio,” and “hihat” are the worst I can locate).

Focusing on sheer content, by this logic, is impossible. Nabokov’s translation runs into more and more problems the more focused on the aesthetic interplay of the words the original is. In a sense, music is the limit of this trade-off, the point at which rhythm, rhyme, et cetera, fully overtake content. We can treat music, therefore, as poetry without the words. Wilson’s modest suggestion that the translator “put in a few unimportant words in order to sustain the rhythm,” takes on a whole new significance; “unimportant words” are the only available option, as “rhythm,” broadly understood of course, is the only element to be sustained. Nabokov’s “absolute exactitude,” so stubbornly applied exclusively to meaning regardless of meaning’s proportional weight in the work, now becomes anything but absolute. Furthermore, although poetry is almost always written, its aesthetic appeal is rarely visual. Rhymes are not lined up with one another in order to demonstrate unity; indeed, rhymes occasionally share no characters at all with one another. Similarly, syllables are not organized in terms of meter. The sort of aesthetic unity one finds in language is perceived in the same way that language was originally conceived: aurally, whether it is read or heard. In other words, the troubling barrier to representation of music with language – that we hear one and see the other – actually doesn’t exist at all.

Certainly, the Roman alphabet has no codified representation of tone, but on the whole this is not an entirely foreign notion. We have an entire category of words involved in the direct imitation of sound. Onomatopoeia calls to mind the paradigmatic examples – “splat,” “bang,” “zip” – but, as the Batman television show demonstrated, there is plenty of room for creative expansion. In translating “She Moves She,” this possibility was tempting. Unfortunately, abusing the flexibility offered by onomatopoeia could easily lead to a “translation” that was not into dictionary-approved English at all. In fact, specific onomatopoeias have no cause other than happenstance to be claimed by any particular language. Regardless, a melody-for-melody reconstruction of the piece in the style of “woom beeyou-boo beeyou-boo” would be more akin to an a capella cover of the piece than a translation, even if it were written down. As we will see, onomatopoeia is not entirely on the wrong track, but at the moment it appears a gross distortion of Wilson’s “few unimportant words” recommendation.

The truth is, Wilson was hardly recommending words that were quite that unimportant. Most literary translators would still have a relatively broad conceptual framework to work with even when they were inspired to reconstruct a piece’s “fluency,” to borrow Venuti’s phrase. The music translator, at least initially, has no such framework. One of my larger “leaps” as a translator was to create my own, describing the sounds I heard with accessible metaphors to space and action. Historically speaking, this is not unusual. People naturally refer to music’s “texture” or the “behavior” of a particular melody. It is hardly an esoteric music theory to suggest that sounds of greater wavelength are, somewhat arbitrarily, “down,” while shorter ones are “up.” I trust that there is nothing abstract in my describing a quiet, echoing going as “distant” even though all of the music originates from exactly the same distance throughout. To be sure, some of the personification verbs in particular are deliberately creative: “dance,” “limp,” “weep,” “plod,” stutter” and “reach” perhaps give away the moments that resonated with me as particularly “human,” but it is important to bear in mind that these metaphors in themselves are not the entire picture, in fact they are tantamount to the picture’s frame.

The more-or-less improvised metaphors fill the role of the content music seems to have eliminated. Far more accurate to the music than the content is the way in which the content is expressed. I have mentioned the temptation of onomatopoeia; I am certain it is not limited to words for which the best definition is their own sound. Phonetic representation of meaning pervades the English language, and this “borderline-onomatopoeiatic language” can be utilized to recreate the aesthetic experience of music so long as a framework of meaning exists. “Borderline-onomatopoeiatic language” treats sound as a paintbrush to describe anything in the physical world (emotions and other abstract nouns are understandably excluded). No word in my translation could be substituted with just any synonym. I paid very close attention to the specific aural nature of the words, and the interplay they created with the raw definition of the word.

When choosing the words, I first and foremost tried to encompass the features of the sound that were the most characteristic. To illuminate a few examples. In the places where I felt that the most significant feature of the element was its interaction with rhythm, I tried to favor phrases with as many or few staccato consonants as possible. “Rapid metronomic tapping,” “erratic stutter” and the slightly more dilapidated “tumbling arpeggiation” noted important concentrations of sound, while “yawning” is an expansive word without the strong borders of, say, “vacuum.” Contextually unusual tones are implied by the tightness of the vowels: it scarcely bears mentioning that the “tickle” involves brief high tones while the “dollop” is low and spacious. Even in the cases where I didn’t intend to be creative so much as accurate, the colloquial language still struck me as “borderline-onomatopoeiatic”: “hiss” has an infinitely elastic yet friction driven beginning and end; “pluck” is full of potential energy before the frank conclusion; “strum” packs together consonants before holding out a final reverberation.

I tried to attain a certain momentum with the piece by describing each element approximately in real-time, with the assumption that I was shifting focus from one layer to another as I went. The cliché tells us that “a picture is worth a thousand words” and so too may be true of music, but the longer one spends describing the metaphor, the more of a chance the audience has to delve into the specific, flawed definitions of the words. At times the risks may have gotten out of hand; “weeping” carries with it a huge amount of baggage and possibility for scattershot interpretation on the part of the audience, but it is harder to access that in the middle of an unceasing sentence. The translation, therefore, is not intended for a close reading, and would ideally be read aloud. Even with this in mind, maintaining real-time proved especially difficult when I was faced with sections of little new information and sections of intensely compressed information. I felt an irrational obligation to somehow maintain the same degree of detail even as its concentration shifted wildly. Cycle 5 says it all. The entirety of the text for the cycle occurs within about half a second, while the remainder of the cycle simply reiterates what has already been presented to the listener. On top of that, I relied by force of habit on relative rather than absolute descriptions – for example, describing the second plucked string melody in relation to the first – so that I wouldn’t be boring and repetitious in describing virtually the same thing. The issue there is that I was using borderline-onomatopoeiatic language that was actually aurally the opposite of what was being heard at that point.

This all adds up to a structural issue that I failed to address as thoroughly as the sound issue. My lone – and painfully insufficient – innovation in this respect was to divide up the translation into numbered eight bar “chunks” that would ideally guide the reader’s attention to the distribution of elements. The irony is that I chose the song “She Moves She” because of its deliberate and minimalist structure. The different elements are easily traceable if not identifiable, and they arrive and depart in neatly arranged layers. There is no question that music with other musical structures, be it the verse-chorus-verse of mall punk, the movements of classical music or the chaos of avant-garde noise, would pose far greater challenges to the translator in terms of how to literally lay out the writing on the page. The number of structural variations are a quality of music that may turn out to be the Achilles Heel of translation, but what I have shown here is that, at the very least, within a passable representation of a simple structure there is a possibility to translate each element independently.

Nabokov is not wrong to insist on a standard of absolute accuracy. He is simply mistaken to think that a literal translation of content is in any way absolute except perhaps in the purported case of analytic philosophy. With music on the other extreme, we see the creative liberties of translators become so untethered that they must develop their own temporary content to house their phonetic imitations or “borderline-onomatopoeiatic language.” In some ways it is refreshing to have no intrinsic “content” in music that might be defiled by an attempt at imitation, and to know that accuracy can only lie in a successful auditory representation. There are some doubts about just how irrelevant the metaphorical content is – if an infant could derive pleasure from my Four Tet translation because of how it sounds rather than what it means, have I succeeded? – and obviously the aforementioned structural question remains to be thoroughly investigated. But my hope is that I’ve dissolved the first barrier to accepting the idea of music translation: the notion that a piece of “poetry without words” is permanently exiled from the realm of language.

Appendix

 

Artist: Four Tet (aka Kieran Hebden)

Song: “She Moves She”

Album: Rounds (Domino, 2003)

Length: 4:41 (1:40 translated)

Note: I have divided my translation into “cycles” of thirty-two beats (eight measures) of approximately 16.5 seconds each because it accommodates virtually every regular element of the song. Those described elements not designated with an asterisk are regular and return in each cycle until noted.

1. A low-high-double-low-high pound over rapid metronomic tapping. About two beats per second with a spurt of bass tone on the first of every four, and on the last of every sixteen a clipped hihat.

2. After the first sixteen beats, a gradual rise of a twinkling chime loop over a surging, limping drone.

3. On the left, a weeping string arches upward twice, then a tumbling arpeggiation dances down, swoops up and suspends. Midway a distant filtered gong. Simultaneously on the right, a placid, deliberate frame of single plucks and strums. In the second half, a similar but fragmented reiteration of the left melody is less reaching, more exact. Finish is less broad and rapid, relying on three decisive tones.

4. One dollop of bass per four beats, the first and fifth comparatively seismic and the two intervening sets of three diminished. In the sixteenth beat, just before the hihat, a miniscule cell phone tickle.

5. A first-beat hiccup, swapping rhythm for hiss and two focused tones*.

6. A sudden yawning, free of all but percussion, a deeper chime plod, and a barely audible single-tone hum. Just before the last eighth of the cycle, an erratic stutter of cut-and-paste electric guitar. The final jab shoots up before its cutoff.

 


Posted by enigmatichowler at 12:18 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:49 AM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, March 13, 2008
2008 Album Ratings

I'm usually wily and do this in secret, because I like to pretend that, like other bloggers, I have more words than numbers on my mind. But I figure why not share a few easy-access quantitative opinions with the public? Therefore, these are the albums released this year that I've heard enough to have a lasting opinion, to be updated as I form opinions. Which is as rapidly as you can possibly imagine.

The first number is the score, of which you're probably familiar. If I were to judge "everything" (in scare-quotes, of course) they'd probably average 5, but here they tend to be high because I tend to check out that which is recommended to me or moderately acclaimed. Scale as follows:  10=Desert-Island Masterpiece 9=Excellent 8=Great 7=Good 6=Solid 5=Mediocre 4=Lacking 3=Bad 2=Terrible 1=Absymal

The second number is necessary out of sheer honesty. I can't always make any claim to particular critical "authority" on an album and a lot of the time I judge before I truly know, you know? In any case, on a scale of 1 to 5 I try to gauge how confident I am in my rating. Scale as follows: 5 = I know it by heart, can sing along, has pervaded my life 4 = Listened a lot, know it pretty damned well 3 = I've listened to it a good bit 2 = I've given it at least one or two listens through 1 = I'm familiar with several of the songs and their approximate sequence

Beach House - Devotion (Carpark) 8 [2]

Bon Iver - For Emma, Forever Ago (Jagjaguwar) 7 [1]

Breeders - Mountain Battles (4AD) 7.5 [2] 

Brian Jonestown Massacre - My Bloody Underground (a) 6 [1]

Nick Cave - Dig Lazarus Dig (Mute) 7 [1]

Clinic - Do It (Domino) 7 [3]

Dandy Warhols - Earth to the Dandy Warhols (Beat the World) 5 [1]

Deerhunter - Microcastle (Kranky) 7.5 [1]

Department of Eagles - In Ear Park (4AD) 8 [1]

Destroyer - Trouble in Dreams (Merge) 7.5 [2]

Dodos - Visiter (Frenchkiss) 8 [3]

Dosh - Wolves and Wishes (Anticon) 8 [1]

Drive-By Truckers - Brighter Than Creation's Dark (New West) 7 [2]

Earth - The Bees Made Honey In the Lion's Skull (Southern Lord) 6.5 [1]

Brian Eno/David Byrne - Everything That Happens Will Happen Today (n/a) 7.5 [2]

The Fall - Imperial Wax Solvent (Sanctuary) 7.5 [2]

Firewater - The Golden Hour (Bloodshot) 6.5 [1]

Flying -  Faces of the Night (Menlo Park) 7.5 [3]

Fleet Foxes - Fleet Foxes (Sub Pop) 7.5 [2]

Foals - Antidotes (Sub Pop) 7.5 [1]

Fuck Buttons - Street Horrrsing (ATP) 7 [1]

Fujiya & Miyagi - Lightbulbs (Deaf Dumb & Blind) 7 [2]

Grouper - Dragging a Dead Deer Up a Hill 8 [2]

Gutter Twins - Saturnalia (Sub Pop) 8 [2]

Hauschka - Ferndorf (?) 7 [1]

High Places - High Places (Thrill Jockey) 7.5 [2]

Hualun - Silver Daydream (?) 7 [1]

Leila - Blood, Looms and Blooms (Warp) 7.5 [1]

Dominique Leone - Dominique Leone (self-released) 6.5 [1]

Lykke Li - Youth Novels (LL) 7 [1]

Magnetic Fields - Distortion (Nonesuch) 8 [2]

Stephen Malkmus and the Jicks - Real Emotional Trash (Matador) 7.5 [1]

M83 - Saturdays=Youth (Mute) 7.5 [2]

MGMT - Oracular Spectacular (Sony) 6.5 [1]

Mountain Goats - Heretic Pride (4AD) 7 [1]

Music Tapes - Music Tapes For Clouds and Tornadoes (Merge) 8.5 [2]

Nico Muhly - Mothertongue (Brassland) 7.5 [2]

Paavoharju - Laulu Laakson Kukista (Fonal) 8.5 [3]

Plants & Animals - Parc Avenue (Secret City) 7 [1]

Portishead - Third (Island) 9 [4]

Raveonettes - Lust Lust Lust (Vice) 7.5 [1]

Hank Roberts - Green (Winter & Winter) 7.5 [2]

Roots - Rising Down (Def Jam) 7 [1]

Ruby Suns - Sea Lion ('Lil Chief) 6.5 [1]

Shearwater - Rook (Matador) 8 [1]

Sigur Ros - Med sud i eyrum vid spilum endalaust (XL) 6.5 [2]

Silver Jews - Lookout Mountain, Lookout Sea (Drag City) 7 [1]

Snowman - The Horse, the Rat and the Swan (Dot Dash) 7.5 [1]

Spiritualized - Songs in A&E (Fontana Universal) 7 [1]

Stereolab - Chemical Chords (4AD) 8 [3]

Times New Viking - Rip It Off (Matador) 7 [2]

Titus Andronicus - The Airing of Grievances (Troubleman) 6.5 [1]

 

Shugo Tokumaru - Exit (Almost Gold) 8 [3]

Vampire Weekend - Vampire Weekend (XL) 7.5 [2]

Chad VanGaalen - Soft Airplane (Sub Pop) 8.5 [3]

Walkmen - You & Me (Gigantic) 6.5 [1]

The War on Drugs - Wagonwheel Blues (Secretly Canadian) 8.5 [4]

Why? - Alopecia (Anticon) 8 [3]

Wolf Parade - At Mount Zoomer (Sub Pop) 7.5 [2]

Women - Women (Flemish Eye) 7.5 [1]

Wye Oak - If Children (Merge) 7.5 [2]

Albums Reissued in 2008

Important to note that I'm reviewing the albums, not the reissues themselves. Just to clear up the confusion that clogs most reissue reviews. 

Air - Moon Safari (Source) 7 [2]

Beck - Odelay (Geffen, 1996) 9 [5]

Elvis Costello - This Year's Model (Radar, 1978) 8.5 [2]

Love - Forever Changes (Elektra, 1967) 8.5 [3]

Michael Jackson - Thriller (Epic, 1982) 7.5 [3]

Microphones - The Glow Pt. 2 (K Records, 2001) 9 [4]

Mission of Burma - Vs. (Ace of Hearts, 1982) 8 [2]

Liz Phair - Exile in Guyville (Matador, 1993) 9 [4]

The Replacements - Let It Be (Twin/Tone, 1984) 8.5 [3] 

 

Parts & Labor at The 'Sco, 11/14/07

(Originally Published in The Grape)

I’d like to start by tipping my hat to Joe Wong who, as of Wednesday’s show, just completed his second month drumming for Brooklynite post-hardcore trio Parts & Labor. I was worried when I learned that Chris Weingarten had left the group and Wong had been found through a public applicant invitation on their website – Weingarten’s often-brilliant interplay between endless fills and locked-in tribal marches was crucial to the sound of the band’s last two albums. To Wong’s credit, he delivered the fucking goods, albeit with a tense attention to accuracy that seemed to prevent him from having much fun of his own. Thankfully bandmates BJ Warshaw and Dan Friel had more than enough for the three of them; it made for a show that was over too soon to feel like much more than an appetizer.

First opener Grass Canyon was a study in slow, spacious tones. The surprisingly fidgety lone member sat in the center of the stage, shifting his focus from singing to guitar to pedal to knob-twiddling a little more impatiently than his music might have suggested. Some transitions were smoother than others, but the performance itself ultimately distracted from the sheer porousness of the sound he was producing. Taken on its own, it was gorgeous, if somewhat conventional, bare-bones shoegaze – infinitely better with eyes shut.

If Grass Canyon wasn’t necessarily performance-oriented, second opener The Scarcity of Tanks – a last-minute stand-in for the sorely-missed Clipd Beaks – was performative to the point of gimmick. Sure, there’s lots to say that sounds like a blast on paper: the monotone singer sauntering on and off stage with hands in his pockets, the convulsing drummer balancing a cowbell or dangling chimes from his sticks, the guitarist on the ground off the right side of the stage delicately humping his guitar. The sound’s “how” was interesting, its “what” totally unfocused. Like any machine gun aimed at a dartboard, each in-his-own-world musician hit pleasure centers, but never, it seemed, at the same time.

So anyone who knew what the Wire-on-Prozac headliner was capable of were totally unsated, and by the time the band took the stage at nearly midnight my mouth was watering. Warshaw didn’t try any virtuoso shit with his bass, preferring to let its crumbly distortion speak for itself. Friel’s keyboard and guitar parts tended to skirt the surface a little more than I’d have liked, given especially the brain-sawing potential of those jagged, ever-toppling organ melodies, but at the same time Friel was by far having the hottest love affair with his instruments.

The bulk of the ten-song set was understandably oriented around the band’s trademark frenetic pace, drawing a little much from 2006’s transitional Stay Afraid, which saw the band struggling to tie new anthemic vocals around the linear instrumental decompositions of Groundswell (of which they sadly steered clear here… WONG!). I was struck by the show’s pummelling discreteness, many songs mercilessly cropped of their album versions’ droney intros and outros.

The best moments in the show, then, demonstrated the band’s newfound penchant for breadth and economy. They milked the chills by elongating the relentlessly oscillating drum opening of “Long Way Down,” letting its glittery guitar line gradually trickle into place. Other standouts were Mapmaker opener “Fractured Skies” and the last song of the set, Celtic-tinged crowdpleaser “A Great Divide.” The band seemed to love these songs as much as I did, “breathers” though they were, so it’s a head-scratcher that they didn’t plop a handful more of Mapmaker’s many strong tracks to turn a show that was short and hard into a more fleshed out experience. But color me biased; I was in no mood to mosh and have never liked run-of-the mill hardcore. Given two different sorts of potential fan, (ignoring the probably-nonexistent Groundswell crowd, here) then, the band struck a good balance and managed a strong, quintessential show.

For the Record:

Parts & Labor - Groundswell (JMZ, 2003) 7

Parts & Labor - Stay Afraid (Jagjaguwar, 2006) 6.5

Parts & Labor - Mapmaker (Jagjaguwar, 2007) 8

Reviews for LostatSea.net (all property of las):

A Sunny Day in Glasgow - Scribble Mural Comic Journal (Notenuf, 2007)

Scissors for Lefty - Underhanded Romance (Eenie Meenie, 2007)

Trilobite - Trilobite (self-released, 2007)


Posted by enigmatichowler at 10:37 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:00 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, December 28, 2007
Top Albums of 2007

Again, I'll annotate this randomly rather than all at once as I feel bursts of inspiration. Once again I did a Hall of Fame list, and a "favorite album of previous year not heard 'till this one," but I didn't completely reorder my 2006 list, despite some major changes. I figure, as I've explained in past years, the lists should stand as snapshots of my taste at that particular moment. Yes, time has shown Califone to far outshine Ghsotface and Swan Lake, but it's ultimately a painful process to insert my foot into my mouth in black-and-white. Here we go:

1. Radiohead – In Rainbows (Self-Released)

2. Sunset Rubdown – Random Spirit Lover (Jagjaguwar)

3. Peter Bjorn and John – Writer’s Block (Wichita)

4. Caribou – Andorra (Merge)

5. Blitzen Trapper – Wild Mountain Nation (Lidercow Ltd.)

6. Spoon – Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga (Merge)

7. Black Moth Super Rainbow – Dandelion Gum (Graveface)

8. Hotel Alexis – Goliath I’m On Your Side (Broken Sparrow)

9. Deerhunter – Cryptograms (Kranky)

10. Dinosaur Jr – Beyond (Fat Possum)

11. Parts & Labor - Mapmaker (Jagjaguwar/Brah)

12. Iron & Wine - The Shepherd's Dog (Sub Pop)

13. Machine Go Boom - Music For Parents (Collectible Escalators)

14. Panda Bear - Person Pitch (Paw Tracks)

15. Battles - Mirrored (Warp)

16. The National - Boxer (Beggars Banquet)

17. Blonde Redhead - 23 (4AD)

18. A Sunny Day in Glasgow - Scribble Mural Comic Journal (Notenuf)

19. White Stripes - Icky Thump (Warner Bros.)

20. Menomena - Friend and Foe (Filmguerrero/Barsuk)

 

Favorite Album of 2006 Not Heard 'Till 2007:

Junior Boys - So This Is Goodbye (Domino)

 

Personal Hall of Fame Nominations:

Faust – IV (Virgin, 1973)

Pretty Things – S.F. Sorrow (Snapper, 1968)

This Heat – Deceit (Rough Trade, 1981)

Wire – Chairs Missing (Harvest, 1978)

Young Marble Giants – Colossal Youth (Rough Trade, 1980)

Posted by enigmatichowler at 9:15 PM EST
Updated: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:13 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, December 21, 2007
Top Tracks of 2007

What I mean by that, of course, is favorites, and by that I mean favorites. These are the songs that I got totally obsessed with this year and listened to on repeat... a weird thing for me to do being the pole-up-my-ass album guy I am. But these songs were utterly unique or complete standouts that I didn't need the rest of the album to enjoy. I'll hopefully tack on a few comments when I get the chance. But probably not going to post a mixtape this year. I'll make one just for you if you ask tho.

1. Blonde Redhead - "23" from 23 (4AD)

2. Caribou - "Sandy" from Andorra (Merge)

3. Blitzen Trapper - "Sci Fi Kid" from Wild Mountain Nation (Lidkercow Ltd)

4. Deerhunter - "Heatherwood" from Cryptograms (Kranky)

5. Black Lips - "Veni Vidi Vici" from Good Bad Not Evil (Vice)

6. Magik Markers - "Taste" from Boss (Ecstatic Peace)

7. Battles - "Atlas" from Mirrored (Warp)

8. Panda Bear - "Bros" from Person Pitch (Paw Tracks)

9. A Sunny Day in Glasgow - "5:15 Train" from Scribble Mural Comic Journal (Notenuf)

10. Fuck, we'll call it a tie, much as I hate indecisiveness:

White Stripes - "Icky Thump" from Icky Thump (Warner Bros)

Parts and Labor - "Unexplosions" from Mapmaker (Jagjaguwar)

Haven't heard any of them? Listening to songs based off lists is... well I actually haven't taken the time to judge it. Seems like it'd be hard to fully get the idea of what it's about, but I've become a huge fan of the following site to which I will inscribe my endorsement:

www.hypem.com

I bet you find most of these on there somewhere... for panda bear try to find the 12 minute version tho, it's just not the same effect when it doesn't seem to go on forever. Just like this blog! Ha... Not worth saying.


Posted by enigmatichowler at 2:35 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Title: (optional)

Make it an actual blog? Sure, okay. Stop pretending this will validly get you a job writing for anyone? That's right, Mr. Peabody. I'm going to start blogging in my best stream of conscious (while I'm baked SHHHH), just like Lester Bang's would've done. You know, I thought he was brilliant, but I mentioned him as an influence to someone the other day and they laughed. "Ohh man, I was at this shooowww.... and I think there might have been some band playing there... SHIT." That shit was mine, actually, thinking I had to go. And look. I'm not even going to delete it. Not that you could look if I were. K, done.

Shit, pointer hovering over the "Post" button. I should be delighted to post a random paragraph, right above my fucking alphabetical list of reviews. Nothing like a perfect blog that scarcely reflects one's personality: everything has a proper heading, it's all so symmetrical. Right now this paragraph is too short - tho I'm betting it won't in the final version. I haven't talked about music yet, what about Just Reviews? Fuck it, Bloggers have it right. Derrida's my man this year. Call this my poststructuralist phase. Glad that this post will have punctured my philosophy in black and white once and for all. At least the Swan Lake review pretended to have a beginning and end, a neatly bracketed and filed away brain spill.


Posted by enigmatichowler at 10:17 PM EST
Updated: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:35 AM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Sunday, May 6, 2007
CURRENTLY ARCHIVED
[Note: All lists and scores subject to change or contradiction without notice]

Album Reviews
AFI - Decemberunderground (Interscope, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Agent Sparks - Red Rover (Immortal/Red, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Beck - Guero (Interscope, 2005) Posted October 20, 2005
Belle and Sebastian - The Life Pursuit (Matador, 2006) Posted April 14, 2006
Andrew Bird (&) The Mysterious Production of Eggs (Righteous Babe, 2005) Posted October 6, 2005
Cake – Comfort Eagle (Columbia, 2001) Posted June 29, 2005 [originally written 2003]
Clap Your Hands Say Yeah – Clap Your Hands Say Yeah (Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, 2005) Posted December 2, 2005
Coheed and Cambria - Good Apollo, I'm Burning Star IV, Volume One: From Fear Through the Eyes of Madness (Sony, 2005) Posted March 5, 2006
Cursive – The Ugly Organ (Saddle Creek, 2003) Posted June 29, 2005
Death Cab For Cutie - Plans (Atlantic, 2005) Posted December 21, 2005
Eels - Blinking Lights and Other Revelations (Vagrant, 2005) Posted September 23, 2005
Fiery Furnaces - Bitter Tea (Fat Possum, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Final Fantasy - He Poos Clouds (Tomlab, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Flying - Just-One-Second-Ago-Broken-Eggshell (Mill Pond, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Franz Ferdinand – Franz Ferdinand (Domino, 2004) Posted July 6, 2005
Ghostface Killah - Fishscale (Def Jam, 2006) Posted Monday, October 16, 2005
Gist - Diesel City (Red Stapler, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
I Can Make a Mess Like Nobody’s Business – I Can Make a Mess Like Nobody’s Business (Drive-Thru, 2004) Posted August 16, 2005
Jet Lag Gemini - Business EP (Doghouse, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Mates of State - Bring It Back (Barsuk, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
The New Pornographers – Twin Cinema (Matador, 2005) Posted November 2, 2005
Our Lady Peace - Happiness Is Not a Fish That You Can Catch (Sony, 1999) Posted June 29, 2005 [originally written 2004]
Pony Up! - Make Love To the Judges With Your Eyes (Dim Mak, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Saint Etienne – Tales From Turnpike House (Savoy Jazz/Sanctuary, 2006) Posted March 5, 2006
Seth Feldman - The Equistonaut EP (Self Released, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
The Smashing Pumpkins – Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness (Virgin, 1995) Posted June 29, 2005 [originally written 2004]
Spanish For 100 - Metric EP (SPF, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
Streetlight Manifesto - Keasbey Nights (Victory, 2006) Posted Feb 5, 2007 [originally written for UpBeetMusic, 2006]
The Strokes – First Impressions of Earth (RCA, 2006) Posted March 5, 2006
Swan Lake - Beast Moans (Jagjaguwar, 2006) Posted May 6, 2007
Wolf Parade – Apologies to the Queen Mary (Sub Pop, 2005) Posted December 9, 2005

Other Stuff
Morningwood with Army of Me & The Exit Live at the Bowery Ballroom Posted January 19, 2006
The Sutras Live at Grassroots Posted July 26, 2005
2006 Year-End List, etc. Posted January 10, 2007
2006 Mixtape Posted December 21, 2006
2005 Year-End Bonanza Posted December 28, 2005

Posted by enigmatichowler at 8:50 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Swan Lake - Beast Moans (Jagjaguwar, 2006)
"Cling to the sum of your parts for a man/ is never what he does, never what he tries..."
-"A Venue Called Rubella"

I.
One oversimplification of music that seemed particularly to hit one nail on its head, and actually gave me chills the way gross generalizations typically don?t anymore for me, arose while a friend was ranting about the innovations of Hendrix (I know a lot of people that scoff, sarcastically chortle, ?yep, those Beatles were pretty good!? but if the most foundational acts of all time aren?t worth ours, then music criticism is just skipping stones). This friend was saying that few technological advances in music will ever measure up to the jump from mono to stereo, and how Hendrix immediately saw the implications and created music that literally existed in space; it was no longer a drug-induced pseudo-synaesthesiac analogy to describe psychedelic guitar lines as ?weaving,? for example. I personally imagine the arrival of stereo felt something like a second eye for Cyclops ? sudden depth perception, conflicting patterns the brain needing to work to unify, a whole new goddamn dimension. And with this sudden spatial component to music, an inevitable binary arose that still exists today, between so-called ?headphone music? and the implicit counterpart ?stereo music.? I feel a bit like an introductory physics teacher, trying to redefine words with which everyone?s already familiar, but I?m entirely comfortable equating these with, respectively, psychedelic music and punk. The words themselves border on the arbitrary, but they?re functional. Bear with me (though I can promise it?ll be worth it only insofar I can promise the album is, which is to say, I can?t).

It?s interesting, because in an almost ritualistic enactment of the critical ?distance? factor, (and because I have irritatingly bad luck with headphone jacks demanding rotation and massage to work) I typically listen to music on either my computer or my stereo. I realize this doesn?t actually align with my tastes; I?m very much I psychedelia man (using my broad but potentially exhaustive definitions) and yet I my experience of music often involves witnessing music as a location, creating a sort of phantom of the musicians in my own room. In other words, music has an extremely visceral locality that fits like a jigsaw piece into the listener?s sense of time and space, the concept of the experience that gets some people absolutely obsessed with punk rock. I?m not one of those people, however. I hate moshing, I dance only when I feel there are deliberate cracks in the music to be filled with my own tangents or digressions, otherwise I feel like I?m usurping the musicians? crown instead of creating that ideal artistic intercourse, from my limited experience I hate jamming, and not just because of my abysmal improvisational prowess. Beyond all this, my chief self-criticism in life is that I?m hopelessly focused on intellectualizing everything (you couldn?t tell, could you?) until action no longer has any possible place in reason, evaluating my options until they aren?t there any more. This isn?t a sob story, mind you ? I just find that the art people enjoy often has staggering and pervasive implications in the rest of their lives.

Which brings me to psychedelia, a complete reversal of the punk rock form entirely by virtue of how it is absorbed. Instead of an obtrusion, the music becomes an engulfment, a definitive environment for the brain in which space and time are dampened. At the avant-garde extreme, one?s own mind is the obtrusion, our dogmatic beliefs whittled and challenged. Hey, this is probably why at a handful of short-lived attempts and nary a full run, Scott Walker?s The Drift remains a sad, ineffectual 6.5 in my book. As long as it was on stereo speakers, it had the potential to be peripheral, which reduced its ambitions to farce. As J-Lo said in The Cell, ?my world, my rules.? Thus avant-garde remains, for me, something to see live, to float or drown in, but typically not a worthy investment in album format. I?m not defending, I?m not even justifying, I?m just accounting. So this can all be watered down to another damn ?happy medium? cliche, because I need at least a few gripping elements of punk to really get into the psychedelia. Enter Swan Lake, my transient and amorphous Album Of The Year For The Moment. Its Freud-fucking devotion to the absolute limit of cerebral instability renders it both far greater and far less than a trite ?happy medium,? for sure. Interchange ?happy? with any of the slew of colorful adjectives I?m likely to come up with, and you?ll begin to get an idea.

My roommate says that Beast Moans isn?t enough of a ?statement? to be an album of the year, and to be sure, it remains a very different you-know-what than the classically minimalist folk opus from Sufjan that we shared at the top of our ?05 lists. But it?s a fucking statement if I ever heard one, though its utter uniqueness has been clogged by blogger accusations, weak-stomached critics and, I admit, questionable consistency. Incidentally, a music store clerk I see on breaks summed up its appeal with a simultaneously elegiac and lucid sentence (and I?m polishing a bit here): ?When I someday go insane, I hope the voices in my head are as beautiful as the ones on this album.? Why we see ?insane? as a pejorative is beyond me ? I?m personally fond of the idea of music that explores the infinite complexity of a world constantly in flux, both the terrifying trap and disorienting freedom (to be alone with the freedom) of a distorted mind. I chalk it up to mankind?s search for schematic order that we remain in vehement denial about that not-too-distant horizon of warped reality, despite common knowledge about, for example, eyewitness testimony. If reality is literally molded by our hopes, beliefs, good god, our deepest fears, then we?re just a Plank in Reason from an existence of shattered, mutilated porcelain dolls and melting landscapes, like the beautiful and horrific acid trip of Beast Moans? album art. Interesting, then, that people are so quick to adore the slacker-rock of Tapes ?n? Tapes or, hell, Pavement. It hearkens back to the old definition of indie rock as people with more ideas than money, or talent, or whatnot. We revel in imperfection, to an extent, because we recognize the limitations of our own bodies, but our minds remain somehow sacred ? we?d never peel the onion that far.

In fact, we come to separately love music that toughens our resolve, maintains order in our own minds. Stereolab comes to mind, with its endless spirals of complex but inherently geometric arrangements. In many ways, so does Sufjan; his is a world guided by rules, where humans are hopeless and must submit to the cyclical laws of nature. At times it?s even heartbreaking, how resilient the world he paints is to human beings. The woodwinds pitter-pattering like raindrops dampen the jarring emotions at the end of ?Predatory Wasp,? and even the momentous and tumbling chorus of ?Chicago? is a fatalist panorama: ?All things go.? Illinois was ultimately a profoundly comforting album even when it made me well up, because it emphasized the irrelevance of consciousness in an ever-turning world. Yet within that consciousness lie the greatest paradoxes, the greatest indeterminism and the greatest chaos that we can ever know. Swan Lake?s contribution to music is really a reconciliation of labyrinthine production values of psychedelia and the refreshing dissonance concentrated within that instant during which a punk guitarist?s third finger is placed on the wrong fret. They disorient rather than dissolve the interlocking melodies we crave, and because of this tension the record positively surges with desperation and pertinence.

Some people have called this the indie equivalent of a sell-out, a lazy, slapped together album of B-side material from three relatively well-known names amongst those versed in Pitchfork and blogosphere. Some sweep the fact that it was recorded separately and without full collaborative consultation under the rug, perhaps because it again implies laziness, but it?s absolutely crucial to what they attain. Sufjan may have made a record bounded by the beautiful harmony of nature, but Beast Moans sees these elements conflict, evolve, flicker or overwhelm, creating a sense of wounded, bleeding fleshiness. It?s important to avoid thinking of it in terms of symmetry ? early on I got caught in the trap of being delighted by the cycle of Bejar, Krug, Mercer, Bejar, Krug, Mercer (it goes awry after that point) and I even developed a complex theory about how Bejar assists Mercer?s songs, Mercer assists Krug?s, and Krug assists Bejar?s (my line of reasoning was that each tended to assist the one they respected? neat, huh?) but ultimately their contributions don?t balance out into a neat little triangle like that. For example, Krug strikes me as utterly independent, fleshing out his songs tightly according to his varying idea of the band?s sound and leaving little room for jarring embellishment. The dilapidated organ bursts in the beginning of ?Nubile Days? fit his tinker toy melody, a ?Fancy Claps? re-hash snapping into place by the final phrase like scattered jacks settling. The ambient organs, sighs, bells and whistles in should-be closer ?Are You Swimming in Her Pools?? never supersede the crystalline intimacy of Krug?s acoustic guitar, whose strings are caressed, strummed and finally beaten like a rising tide. And of course, nary a scrap of the church penetrates the shuddering, minor-turned-major (seriously, kudos to my roommate, check the acrobatic reorientation when Krug?s voice comes in) guitar flood of Indie Anthem of the Year, ?All Fires.?

II.
If the fact that the melodies and potentially even lyrics of Bejar?s contributions probably came to him in his sleep bothers anyone, they need to take a deep breath and be a bit more holistic. Some of the embellishment is superfluous, to be sure, as any flesh on a skeleton could be seen, but Bejar?s bones are also deliberately hollow in anticipation of marrow ? probably the biggest hurdle any classical music theorist would face in listening to Indie and namely Swan Lake is realizing that something as insubstantial, as enigmatic as a single cymbal crash is really at the core of the music. In his Heroes to Zeros review Matt LeMay claimed, ?It's been said that any truly great song can remain just as recognizable and distinctive when broken down to its most basic structure and played on a solo instrument.? It?s said with a bit of tongue-in-cheek, because no one who loves pop and indie music can actually believe that ? this ?problem,? if it?s to be called that, is epic in scope when you start to use it as a lens on everything, unraveling an entire fundamental cultural value in as profound a slippery slope as the Liberal Arts education?s multifaceted, cross-disciplinary proof that we have no free will. Eventually, we return to reality. Eventually, we return to ourselves.

So is reductionism bullshit? Is a piece of art only a ?piece? insofar as one must grab a machete and slice off the appendages of culture, fill the orifices of individual interpretation with cement? It?s hard to believe that I almost lost respect for Os Mutantes when I found out their debut was more than half covers of other Brazilian songwriters, that I somehow devalued the final product because it seemed so fractured. But then, all of a sudden, it seemed liberating; back in the day of the Beatles, who basically achieved their greatest innovations by holing themselves up in a cultural bomb shelter without live performances or anything less than complete studio control ? in a sense, demanding holistic consumption, down in Brazil we saw a group who were so absolutely confident that their interplay with the culture around them was distinct that they carbon-froze it in the most discrete artistic form they could and let history be the judge. For my money, it?s been my MVP for a while in terms of being, as I describe it, not ahead of its time but ahead of time. In simpler language, the art of arrangement became discrete from the basics of pop songwriting in an era that hadn?t yet become disillusioned with four-chord moptop singalongs.

To utterly humanize and even discompose arrangements is obviously not an incredibly new or groundbreaking perspective, then, when you had even in the late sixties a cover of ?Bat Macumba? wherein the chords were merely a surface for the pedaled-up schizo-arachnid guitar solo that lasts most of the song. But rarely have I seen so many elements treated this way; it recalls Caribou?s phenomenal Up In Flames, which people still somehow saw as a groundbreaking ?electronic? album despite almost entirely organic elements, and percussive parts that were uneven, impulsive, messy, even ejaculatory in their primal impetus. But while that coital idea seems key to me with Caribou ? recalling the Marquis de Sade?s sexed-up notion that the passions and impulses of man simply were the purest form of reason and rationality possible, that Enlightenment principles and Romanticism could somehow be reconciled ? an awful lot of Swan Lake?s album is positively Platonic, less a careful collage of those orgasmic moments where the two become one as a wistful vista of the throbbing ether stretched out between them.

(Whoaf. This is one UNFINISHED review. It may remain that way, but I couldn't leave so much saved on my computer for any longer. Also I'm not italicizing fucking album titles anymore, it's too hard.)

8.5

Posted by enigmatichowler at 8:23 PM EDT
Updated: Sunday, May 6, 2007 8:40 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, February 5, 2007
UpBeetMusic Re-Hash
Since upbeetmusic.com is now completely redesigned, and their archived reviews nonexistant, I figured it was as good a time as any to bloat my blog that nobody reads. Just to be thorough, you know. And to demonstrate that when I randomly pick albums to review I'm not quite as fawning as when I buy them with my hard-earned cash. What follows are the reviews, in alphabetical order, that I wrote between March and June 2006. Enjoy, as always.


AFI - Decemberunderground (Interscope, 2006)

Seems this review can hardly stand as much more than a verdict of a binary question: which conclusion will I spout? “For every step backward there’s a step forward” or “for every step forward there’s a step backward”? Like any partner to the age-old “glass of water” metaphor, it’s an empty question, impossible to address either objectively or informatively. I’ll say this about Decemberunderground, however. Its steps are larger, nay, more consequential than those taken on 2003’s (rather impulsively, in my opinion) “classic”-tagged Sing the Sorrow. That album, with a handful of singles and critical acclaim, was seen as a totally premeditated stylistic leap, and is remembered to this day for overcoming the necessarily petty doom ‘n’ gloom of their hardcore goth roots. Some fans were disappointed, but the album was no more “poppy” than it was happy. At its best, it simply sounded vital, a godsend for any band singing about sins and blood.

But though Sing the Sorrow was solid and a definitive statement of purpose in many ways, it was not a bona fide magnum opus, (if you’ll excuse the Latinus ad nauseam) and neither, I’m cheerless to say, is Decemberunderground. I suppose that would be too good to be true. Apparently Davey Havok et al haven’t yet acknowledged their capacity for resonance, because instead of taking their success slowly they continue to squirm in style and songwriting. Time and time again, their successes boil down to Havok’s vocals and what he twists them into. It’s tough to explain why alone his paper-thin nasal tones can sound so bleak and fragile and yet in layers – while his peers rarely manage more than “drunken graduation party” ambiance – they have the conviction of a fascist army. I swear I thought of it before seeing the “Miss Murder” video. “Silver and Cold” alone had so much presence that (and I’m as guilty as any) it’s no surprise people saw the album as a perfectly initiated new chapter in their careers. The context of Decemberunderground illuminates that album’s relative lack of ambition, because this time they really went for a leap – in several directions at once.

This being an album defined more by its chilly expanses than the ever-tumbling momentum of its predecessor, uptempo tracks feel more like lip service than ever. “Kill Caustic” and “Affliction” are veritable rehashes of “Dancing Through Sunday” in their efforts to lace together smooth albeit compressed hooks with verses of earthy screams. The infamous synthetic elements (drum machines, electronics, ethereal choirs) are actually not needlessly schmaltzy in and of themselves. When they dominate, such as in “The Interview” and the “Affliction” breakdown, they have enough emotional focus to avoid superfluity; meanwhile, when they’re smoothly integrated into standout tracks, such as the brief multidimensional pops of the “Miss Murder” drum machine or the ratting reverb in “Love Like Winter,” the result is the most significant music the band has ever made. And indeed, Havok’s signature vocal monoliths blast through enough songs that I’m almost biting my nails about whether it’s less conscious moderation than mere songwriter’s block.

The sad truth is, then, that Decemberunderground’s downfall isn’t its restless style per se inasmuch as a restless style without an exoskeleton. Things start to feel amiss around “The Missing Frame,” which is the beginning of the end for the tragically frontloaded album. Sure, it’s conceptually disenchanting when the army of Zion breaks down into an 80s-dancehall rave (“37mm”) but aesthetically it’s less appealing to people than the worst Sing the Sorrow tracks simply because people would rather have dirt on them than syrup. Losing substance without corking style can be a real mess – just ask Coldplay or the Flaming Lips – so in that sense it’s a relief that AFI still have it in them. Decemberunderground hits more powerful apexes and more depressing nadirs than Sing the Sorrow, but it feels more than ever like a band testing their strengths, figuring out a direction, and preparing to make that masterpiece they surely have in them. Hell, I’d wait five years for it, ‘cause the best of this album isn’t all that easy to outgrow.

6.5


Agent Sparks - Red Rover (Immortal/Red, 2006)

“We aren’t gods here, only humans with a lot of opinions,” snarls Benjamin Eizinger on “Face the Day.” It’s one of the clumsier lyrics on Agent Sparks’ debut LP, Red Rover, but it’s apropos: while routinely sifting through archived reviews I discovered a negative review, by UpBeetMusic’s former-more-or-less-Head-Editor Andres Carrera, of Agent Sparks’ Not So Merry EP from last year. Now, obviously e-zines would be useless if they were merely conglomerates of random preferences, but still it irritates me to no end what fluff reviewers on other sites are expected to add to preserve a sense of coherent taste. Or worse, a reviewer won’t acknowledge a fissure at all. And by gum, you’ll see no such combover with this review! So at the risk of salivating on the glue that holds this site together, Red Rover is an album of unique vision, stable character and conscientious execution. It’s the sound of a band that knows and plays to its strengths, and it’s a strong debut.

The fact is, this isn’t as much an issue of differing opinion as I may have implied. There’s almost a sense that the band members read Andres’ review and pondered their own capabilities. The ground they’ve covered since the EP is immediately obvious; compare the smooth “Optimistic” minor strums that open “Waving By” with the starchy guitar and juvenile yelps of “It’s Not My Time.” For the most part, their fiery sound remains, but it’s laced with attention to detail that transcends, to say the least, the immaturity of a “tantrum.” They haven’t so much tightened their sound (in the spirit of what many considered the EP’s best track, “Choke”) as inflated it to apocalyptic proportions. The only point of Andres’ with which I flat out disagree is his scorn of “Camouflage,” an “Immigrant Song” offshoot with the kettledrums and cavernous space that the Zeppelin track always begged for. While “Camouflage” was a mere droplet on an otherwise monochromatic EP, ominous soundscapes blanket Red Rover.

Despite a keen grasp of emptiness and soullessness, the band still breathes life into their dark little worlds. There’s an almost ritualistic feel to tracks like “Polly Anne” and “Beautiful True,” which spin cobweb grooves of bass and drums around thin, windswept riffs tracing ambivalent circles through the gloom. Ben Eizinger’s throaty sputter and washboard breath have frightening dimension and propinquity, and Frank Black’s an obvious (and overused) comparison. But unlike Kim Deal, Stephanie Eitel’s vocals always align, up to and including the most abrasive moments – often recalling Karen O’s sexually-dripping shrieks. Although it feels like there’s an inherent dissonance, they never blemish their best melodies. In fact, their parallel vocals have surprising versatility, and as often as they need to they whet their jagged tones into architectural harmonies, which rise and dip through an array of semblances. The lyrics are fickle, varying from the appropriately sinister to the flagrantly hackneyed. Harsh angles like “my headache is much more aware of you than I am” and “and when she laughed she made everyone cry: Polly Anne was an accident” cast shadows over the likes of “this is only going to break my heart,” “face it, you don’t even care,” and this review’s epigraph.

The explosive messiness that defined their EP is still crucial to their identity, but admittedly it’s the weakest link on this album. It’s not so much an inherent flaw of the volatile college rock spawned by the Pixies as an want of the specific brand of songwriting prowess necessary to fulfill its potential. Few songs are as irresponsibly built around unchanneled venom as “Mr. Insecurity,” but a handful contain off-putting-at-worst, would-be-hummable choruses which splinter their way into the center of the furrows that most of the songs have coolly established. It’s an interesting tradeoff: the rise-and-fall anticipation so prevalent in pop music loses its value, but most of the songs ultimately dig their tonal roots much deeper than a hook could anyway.

Clearly, they don’t want to lose what demo-tape punk audience they had, even as their songwriting talents clearly transcend the band’s origins. Nor do I deny them the right to those choruses. Yet it would behoove them, when they’ve established such a detailed and sophisticated sound, to try for a smooth evolution of distortion and angst as well – it’s technically integrated, but one can’t help bemusement when this group, that sometimes seems to have conquered the underworld, throws a “tantrum” or two. Minute reservations aside, this album is a stylistic triumph – over flippant encapsulation and a hefty chunk of the year’s debut efforts.

7

Posted by enigmatichowler at 10:35 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, February 10, 2007 6:25 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post

Fiery Furnaces - Bitter Tea (Fat Possum, 2006)

At this point, it basically goes without saying that the Fiery Furnaces are not for everyone. Last year they felt obligated to push their reputation from “yet another recent eccentric indie band” to “the quintessential recent eccentric indie band” with Rehearsing My Choir, an instant slam dunk into the vault of conceptually fascinating records that are referenced more than they’re actually played – right alongside the Flaming Lips’ Zaireeka, Dylan’s Self Portrait and, dare I recall it, Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music. Even when irritating or unbearable to listen to, these were the sorts of albums over which hardcore music buffs and critics (especially the late, great Lester Bangs) absolutely loved to chit-chat, argue and wage war. The Friedberger siblings’ newest creation, Bitter Tea, is neither as alienating as Rehearsing My Choir nor as delectably poppy as their gem-stuffed EP from earlier that same year. It also isn’t as deliberate or definitive as their magnum opus, Blueberry Boat (and we really should be glad for that – reproducing that monster would border on self-parody). Instead, it’s the first record of theirs that exists comfortably in the context of their prolificacy: jammed with ideas and tricks, easily recognizable in tonality and mood, arguably genius without being undeniably solid.

The roles of each of the siblings have grown more dynamic over the past four years, and while this record certainly coalesces better than the free-for-all that was their last album (winding, impenetrable stories and dialogue from Eleanor and her grandmother backed by haphazard baroque keyboards and a mishmash of studio tinkery from Matthew), the delicate tension between the two remains. Take opener “In My Little Thatched Hut,” which clasps the listener’s attention instantly with a tumbling bumblebee synth. The track’s dizzying momentum dwindles like a jogger being handed a weight when Eleanor’s dark, low-register murmur enters. It is, a few seconds in, the first paradox in a record that seems to be grounded in paradox. Eleanor’s presence is too substantial and poignant to be mistaken for a goofy caricature acting out loony narratives, trading “course it wasn’t long till I caught the croup, dawding on the drizzy deck of my majesty’s sloop” for laments that “when I think back on all the wasted years, all the good cheer and all of the charm disappears.” But even as Eleanor emerges a more relatable vocalist, Matthew’s production antics on the album are his least organic yet.

To the duo’s credit, the proverbial “jogger” never collapses, even when they seem to bombard it with contradiction and tortuous song structure. What, for instance, is the point of the single-chord key change at the end of the title track? The easy answer would be to make it an impossible record to ignore, but in the long run Matthew’s philosophy on songwriting appears to be “what doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger.” So, to drag the metaphor to its logical extension, a jogger bearing weights is that much more unstoppable. This vibe is mostly apparent early in the record, which is strung together as a veritable romp through a quagmire of electronic gurgles, whirlwinds, spews and blasts. Eclectic, to be sure, and like nothing else in music today, but it all somehow feels oriented in a similar direction. This is the biggest change from the genre-tangled genius of Blueberry Boat, which managed to integrate disparate elements like ragtime, church organs and acoustic blues with disturbing grace; Bitter Tea tends, with a few exceptions (“Oh Sweet Woods” succesfully laces haunting Spanish arpeggios around a “Billie Jean” bassline) to twist bright instrumentation through bizarre melodies, most often evoking the East Asian tonality heard in the theme of “Quay Cur.”

Still, the record’s cohesive character doesn’t render it monotonous. If anything, the initial run of songs is so mottled with ideas that casual listeners might be convinced it’s a creative peak. But in terms of sheer listening gratification, it’s also the biggest shock to one’s system. So to prevent the album from being exhausting as a whole, a handful of songs are wisely stripped down to the basics. And unlike their bluesy-yarn-stoked debut Gallowsbird’s Bark, bare-bones no longer implies a rootsy sound – the album’s simplest morsels consist of a single, elegant electronic element. Rich dollops and interminable grooves gain a noteworthy presence towards the end, and since these tracks (“Teach Me Sweetheart,” “I’m Waiting to Know You,” “Nevers” and “Benton Harbor Blues”) see the band stopping to smell the roses and letting their ideas speak for themselves without much adornment, they are some of the most soothing, inviting and glorious work the band has ever done, especially for the purposes of winding down the record. The separate versions of “Nevers” and “Benton Harbor Blues” each remove some factor that debatably hinders this effect – an unusual backwards-vocal alternation in the former and some meandering guitars through a squelchy wah-pedal in the latter. The two remixes close the album, so while Bitter Tea may exceed Blueberry Boat temporally, it’s 72 minutes that far more listeners will opt to completely sit though.

There’s a slew of bands throwing in their two cents about what where music should be heading these days, but even the most prominent prog-pop acts like Deerhoof have become strangely dogmatic about it. Their annual albums are an annual vote for a type of music that, for better or for worse, some people like more than others. Even indie cornerstone bands like Built to Spill are releasing new records that are great, sure, but also superfluous, good summaries of their discographies. It was intense curiosity and exploration, often at the expense of easy encapsulation, that made the likes of David Bowie and Lou Reed the greatest artistic voices. Bitter Tea is a remarkable record, full of great successes and great failures, but more importantly it is completely unprecedented and, in terms of the band’s direction, willfully tentative. It’s no album of the year, but it’s the first of this year that seems to demand listeners to really debate, to take a side. Everyone should hear Bitter Tea, because presumably the Fieries aren’t going to be remaking it for the next ten years. Did you just shrug? Defend that position!

8

Posted by enigmatichowler at 10:34 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, February 10, 2007 6:33 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post

Final Fantasy - He Poos Clouds (Tomlab, 2006)

Owen Pallett’s resume is enough to make any spendthrift upper-middle class indie nut’s mouth water, his schtick even more so if possible. The second album for the touring member of the Arcade Fire and Hidden Cameras is in fact ten tracks arranged for a classically trained chamber music ensemble. If you’re waiting for a charmed chortle at the irony of this album’s juvenile title and track names, see: the three hundred other e-zines that got their hands on it. Unfortunately, I can’t be so hasty to declare this album unmistakably more cultivated than its title. He Poos Clouds is at best endearingly labyrinthine, a complex and meticulously pieced-together album that’s ultimately too tortuous and too ambivalent to really intrigue.

Let me level with you. I really only pretend to view music listening as a principally cerebral affair; I deconstruct the elements of poignancy because for me that makes it feel more miraculous, not less. But the poignancy (or whatever) must exist first for me to feel impelled to explore, and to be sure, I’ve filed away many an album in the vein of He Poos Clouds simply because I couldn’t summon the frosty emotional resilience to slog through it straight through. It’s the talking points that the kids love these days more than the albums themselves, like yuppies dropping Ulysses allusions at cocktail parties. So you’re probably asking, well Is it a genuinely good album or just a novelty item to chit chat about instead of listening to it? Answer: meh. It’s an album of ups and downs if ever there were one, but it’s not conventional enough for these characteristics to neatly divide between tracks. Tingling triumphs and twitch-invoking irritations are shaked ‘n’ baked with little moderation within tracks. Again – exactly the right number of distractions and a pal with whom to converse, and this isn’t the worst thing an album can be. But damn if Pallett’s all-in balls to the wall approach isn’t aggravating to any expectation of lucidity or cogency.

My earliest impression was of violin virtuoso Andrew Bird going quietly insane. Though Pallett’s voice is plain and a tad precious, it’s pushed through so many lunatic zigzags that he hardly ends up human at all, much less relatable. Case in point: hoarse, muffled howls appear sporadically throughout the album, and as regularly as any element in the title track and “Do You Love?” Correspondingly, the musical moods are less convincing when as clumsy a marionette as the omnipresent classical instrumentation is forced through such awkward choreography. Typically, Pallett breaks the number one indie rule of thumb: “thou shalt not let yon moodal ambitions be hindered by a narrow or monochromatic set of instruments or sounds.” Bands like Franz Ferdinand don’t need anything fancy like cellos or accordions because they aren’t going for poignancy anyway. It’s safe to say the uneasiest moments on He Poos Clouds are prime examples of stubbornness. To this end, the biggest revelations are consistently when it sounds least like a merely unusual classical piece (the dainty piano pop of “This Lamb Smells Condos” or the muted-plucks-gone-tribal opening “Many Lives 49 MP”).

I admit hypocrisy, of course, because I have a nasty habit of getting adamant about shooting down pervasive good reputations, which obviously directly defies my supposed crusade against paltry context. The theoretical bar of He Poos Clouds is almost impossibly high: to create an entire forty minutes as varied in emotional texture as some of the most successful pieces of popular music (say, Wilco’s illustrious “I am Trying to Break Your Heart” with its stunning versatility transcending its three chords). Even failing at this succeeds in being the rare noble pursuit, albeit one clouded (and restricted) by its own gimmick and lacking subtlety or refinement in songwriting – if it were a guitar-based album it would probably be pegged “B” prog. And it’s only “failure” insofar as we demand the blips of success come together in a humanly blended fashion. I don’t deny his ambition to tackle a broad spectrum, but he should do so in a universe guided by rules; ride, if you will, the thermals of commiserable human experience without highbrow flotsam.

6.5


Flying - Just-One-Second-Ago-Broken-Eggshell (Mill Pond, 2006)

I never anticipated it. The Xerox paper envelope containing a CD-R had three watercolor stripes across the front – hand-painted – and the three track names in sharp pen. My task for the internship was to pick a measly ten good tracks from about sixty mostly-independent discs like this. If I tell you it was no mean feat, it should indicate the general quality of music I was dealing with. So to pop in Flying’s sampler and hear the distant hollow piano at the beginning of “Last Trick” like raindrops off the edge of a haunted house, and subsequently a song that coolly bounced from a Colin Meloy character’s ascension of the gallows to the xylophone-backed naivete of his thin-voiced lover – without once sounding presumptuous or proggy – told me instantly that Flying had long since climbed the fences near which even the most obscure contemporary musicians only dared tiptoe. I did what I could to obtain a promo of their (then) upcoming album, expecting a disappointment with maybe a few quality tracks. At this point it should be obvious that the band caught me off guard yet again.

So I’ll come right out and say it: Just-One-Second-Ago-Broken Eggshell is easily one of the most inventive and exciting debuts of the year so far. The Brooklyn-based foursome has managed to craft an aural identity that is unique but not above tipping its hat to any of the obscure elements and greats of indie rock. Flying treats an array of musical techniques and styles as a game of hopscotch; they touch on the various elements at their disposal in a graceful and orchestrated fashion, without coming off as slipshod or undercutting their considerable talents as musicians. It is the type of music that fills indie nerds with a sort of furious pride: investigative, coordinated, inaccessible or even random to the untrained ear, ambitious as all hell, but never ostentatious.

Take the pervasive pianos, which are so carefully appropriated to each song’s mood that it is hardly obvious that the same instrument is being repeated. Instead of coming off like Cloyplay, the pianos actually become the skittering arachnids of loneliness, the saccharine glimmer of optimism, or the harsh winds and disturbed seas of foreboding. Nor do they limit themselves to piano by a long shot. Even though lyrics are far from the mainstay of their music, Flying are, at heart, storytellers. They break down emotional-musical paradigms (namely, the line in the sand between the abrasive and the twee) that prevent most modern songs from expanding beyond simple laments and jamborees. As such, the band demonstrates a remarkable knowledge of how dynamic shifts can affect a song’s development. When the flames of chaotic drums and distorted organs engulf the lazy featherlike drifting of a lone clarinet or accordion, as occurs in a handful of tracks, it’s obviously not so exhilarating for just any listener. Talk about having an exclusive audience – you have to be the type that shares the band’s triumph when they touch on sudden emotions in unusual contexts. For instance, when the clattering, Tom-Waitsy carnival romp of “Minors” smoothly descends into a lounge-noir piano section, does your face read “poignant” or “huh?”

But for all their moments of genius, the band is decidedly humble about its imperfections. Sometimes the lack of gloss helps the resonance, such as the way the sloppily fingerpicked acoustic guitars instill dimension to their lo-fi recordings, or the slight flatness of the Jeff-Magnum-Regina-Spektor-duet vocalists. It only goes too far when they decide to toss in unfinished ideas that don’t accommodate full-song format incorporation (“Twin Sisters”, “Calvary, Coventry, Critical”, “Pond Life”). These morsels ultimately just fill in the cracks between bona fide songs and, accordingly, somewhat disturb the pace of the album. But the impression of the “real” songs as assortments of ideas channeled through an inimitable vision is only tested in the album’s middle, which contains both the most debatably gratuitous track (“Our Cave”) and two least assertive (“My Mission” and “Stations”). I was almost fooled into thinking they had, like so many other bands, placed their three optimal statements at the beginning, yet as many as four tracks from “Forbidden Sands” onward also vie for the label “centerpiece.” Suffice to say the album is remarkably consistent despite a handful of pitfalls.

Unless their press kit deceives me, none of the ambiance or unusual acoustics are synthetic. The band actually recorded these tracks in barns, on beaches and the like. The dilemma is whether the band is more about their unified elements – the two unique vocalists and their folksy melodies, the sighing breezes of woodwinds, the ethereal throb and twinkle of bass, guitars and pianos and the ferocity of percussive tentacles tribally enveloping a sparse, established rhythm – or the numerous ways they break free of their thin eggshell. It certainly transcends categorization as “difficult” or “melodic” or “complex” or “twee” because it is both all of these things and none of them. Few artists can get away with using a banjo and not create an inexorable southern association, nor can many have a single vocal caw without being plopped in with the impossibly weird “animal” collective. But Flying push so many boundaries and touch something so affecting so often, the listener stops trying to pigeonhole them and starts to notice the ways in which Flying avoids pigeonholing life.

7.5


Gist - Diesel City (Red Stapler, 2006)

Three albums in, the Washington, D.C. trio that is Gist sounds resolute, comfortable with its own sound, and determined to create an album of towering emotions without sacrificing its scope or sense of integrity. Unfortunately, Gist is also awful. Diesel City represents, melodramatically speaking, the cholesterol that clogs the heart of the music industry, and it is not only utterly dispensable but insistently so. They write hook-oriented songs with no hooks and cheerfully leave plenty of room to expand on ideas that aren’t there in the first place. Their goals are such that subdued mediocrity is not an option. This poor band doesn’t have a clue.

Probably the most immediately striking aspect is Nayan Bhula’s irritating voice, an awkward blend of Incubus’ Brandon Boyd and Metallica’s James Hetfield, dipping often from the former’s erratically rhythmic sputter into the latter’s now-wearying syllable embellishments. It doesn’t help that the lyrics are nothing but hackneyed drivel. Put it this way: for the most part, the song titles are the most insightful and original words or phrases he has to contribute in the song, and yes, that goes for “Things Will Work Out” too. Listening to Bhula pour his soul into countless meager, or at best recycled, melodies is like having a huge, unruly dog wrench a leash out of your hands and gallop off; his passion so quickly outstrips any but the most devoted listener that it’s ultimately just frustrating, exhausting and above all, utterly inconsequential. His vocal approach is almost identical from song to song, so for anyone whose lives aren’t overflowing with generic melodrama the vocals will inevitably decay into meaningless jabs of haphazard yowls. Choruses in particular seem like they should be anthemic yet quite frankly demand no anticipation.

Wouldn’t it be disappointing if the instrumental angle of the songwriting weren’t just as slipshod as the vocals? Occasionally the beginning of a track will demand some interest by displaying some (comparatively) original production flourishes, but within a few seconds all of these songs descend into the same tripe. Each song is smeared with quasi-raw power chords that can barely approximate their inane hooks (which are sometimes as crude as a basic set of rhythmic holds – taking the last step to being completely devoid of melody). Yet it becomes abundantly clear that those clumsy blobs of sound that pass for hooks are the band’s most meaningful asset, and instead of writing (again, comparatively) sharp little three minute songs, the majority of the album’s tracks are 4-6 minutes. It may work with the concept of purportedly “epic” post-grunge, but unusual structures are a disaster when a band is this hopeless.

Okay, okay, the first few times everything briefly clears out for a bridge, leaving a thin little arpeggiating guitar and a rhythm section, the album comes closest to creating chills, if not for actually writing something brilliant for suddenly blocking the steady suffocation of finger-paint riffs. But at its worst, the jumbled songwriting is unmerited self-indulgence (as in the 9+ minute “On the Road”). The only hope of a tune outlasting the duration of the album is through merciless repetition and at least some sense of a basic pop philosophy. The Most Enduring Melody award for the album goes to the chorus of “Things Will Work Out,” but it was more like a nauseating leech on my brain than a bona fide good tune. It seems almost like a cruel joke when far too late in, “Lull in the Conversation” and “Diesel City” add some engaging, albeit ungainly, variety as a smooth dollop of multi-instrumented prog and a rootsy bluegrass paean, respectively.

Although output of this sort is pretty damned despicable, it’s hard to conjure much anger for them when the album’s finished. Bands like Gist are a dime a dozen, and there’s a good reason for it: nothing less than a staggering level of ambition can undo the inherent doom in a group of people who are not only average musicians in every way, but utterly self-satisfied about the little they have. And staggering ambition they have not – they aim pretty low, to be at best one of those anachronistic, tired, midtempo metal bands that most of us are sick of by now. It’s a testament to their natural capacities that they fail even at this.

4

Posted by enigmatichowler at 10:22 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, February 10, 2007 6:40 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post

Jet Lag Gemini - Business EP (Doghouse, 2006)

One should always be careful about letting an inordinate degree of novelty affect their appreciation of art, but music by the young seems to be a particular Achilles Heel for critics and fans alike. Conor Oberst leaps to mind, having released his official debut, Letting Off the Happiness at the age of 18, but standards really drop like anvils with acts like Smoosh. Don’t color me curmudgeonly – youth talents get a high five from me. No exception for the 16-to-20-year-olds in Jet Lag Gemini, but ideally I’d give the same response to, you know, the music, no matter what age they were. Sans context, critic reaction to the Business EP should be pretty uniform: these guys have a few things going for them, but they’re a few burnt neurons short of an epiphany.

Not that Vlad Gheorghiu’s guitarwork hasn’t or won’t provoke praise from the non-moshing elite. Long live Eddie Van Halen, he’s got the chops to get a knee-jerk compliment from an 80’s-nostalgic critic or two, but the fact is that the guitar lines that cartwheel around the songs are as aimless (and harmless) as toddlers in snowsuits. Essentially, he was left to add what gratuitous superfluities he’d like without the accomplished guitar style penetrating the shell of the ubiquitous, sludgy rhythm guitar that ultimately seems so much more important to the music Jet Lag Gemini is making. It’s not that I necessarily prefer progginess to power-poppiness. I don’t. But I can’t let myself call this a successful integration of punk-revival structure and hair metal excess, because, though they coexist, there’s precious little interaction.

The reason Vlad’s role on the Business EP smells so fishy to me is the ease with which I could make the above claim. Fact is, it’s hard to give good press to a band that, at its core, sounds so much like so many other bands. I almost ran to a punk-emo pal to help me with the "R.I.Y.L." for fear I’d be told Copeland was an obvious comparison – but no specific comparison is obvious. So the ersatz fusion of purported "virtuosic guitar" and "pop punk sensibilities" gets them a blurb for their record label to spout, but it’s neither a solid reason to buy the record, nor the aspect most will come to appreciate in the band. They’re basically your fun-loving local punk group, except with more than one or two recognizable songs, looking to pump fists and maybe get a little mosh action, but certainly not to appease critics. The six tracks on the Business EP are written using the same old bag of tricks, including as many start-stop dynamics as you can picture (rhythmic holds, five irritating seconds of sappy ballad, pretending to end the song, etc.) And let’s please not even think about breaching traditional verse-chorus-verse structure.

The EP is consistently "good enough" to this end, and I’ll be the first to admit that the less-than-20-minute running time makes the utter lack of variation way easier to swallow than full album format. In terms of promise for future releases, however, this band’s treading on pretty thin ice. Even if they do manage to generate a batch of 11 new songs as consistent as or better than these 6 (in direct defiance of songwriting trends amongst basically everyone but Mark E. Smith, Stephin Merritt, or Robert Pollard) it can only serve to make their live show more varied, not their sound. Writing a review for this stuff is rough because it’s like dissecting a basketball; I feel like I’m missing the point by pretending it’s more cerebral than it is. It’s a basketball. Throw it in the net. Long and short, this is an entirely different culture of music than the one with which I’m accustomed. It sets off different parts of the endocrine system. So frankly, I’m not keen on wasting thoughts that the band themselves probably didn’t have in the first place. Some people will like Jet Lag Gemini, you outta know who you are. I just felt the need to comment on the bigger picture. Call it the Long Version.

5.5


Mates of State - Bring It Back (Barsuk, 2006)

The Mates of State’s fourth album, Bring it Back, is one of calculated endearment. The constituent husband-wife duo (Kori Gardner and Jason Hammel) has meticulously crafted a straightforward album of wholesome, almost exclusively drum-and-keyboard 80’s-revival ditties. There’s a slight variety of different sounds on the album, but they’re generally just synthesizers thinly veiled as instruments. Such cheeseball routines usually irritate my intestinal tract too much to invoke any real emotion, so credit the sporadic euphoria of this album to suspension of disbelief. Lasting suspension of disbelief.

The songs range from midtempo piano ballads to shuddering pop anthems but are unified by their smooth, cyclic songwriting. Energetic as the Mates may often be, they’re anything but schizophrenic; they have no reservations about reiterating a cute tune (and even sticking to the same accompanying lyrics) several more times than you’d expect. Consequently, transitions into choruses and bridges feel a tad epochal, especially when they involve the introduction of a new layer of percussion or a particularly catchy variation on a riff.

Unfortunately, the Mates don’t always capitalize on this strength. Their penchant for understated minimalism makes them masters at building up potential energy, but the value of the anticipation is lost when the songs don’t explode. The weakest songs on Bring It Back feature a promising tune and just enough direction that the listener can’t avoid hoping for a nonexistent destination of buzzing, crescendo'd synthesizers and heavy drums. Frankly, the Mates are too damn clever to write the kind of bare-bone serenades that fill in the cracks of most great albums. It kills me that they’re apparently so interested in being respected that they’d ever squander their almost mathematical liveliness. It’s not a question of melodies, which are consistently charming throughout the album; it’s a question of execution. These could have been ten remarkable dance-mix worthy tracks. Instead, the album’s merely peppered with inevitable highlights in which the impetus holds up to the assurance of repetition- the most obviously superb of which is “Fraud in the ‘80s” which so far takes the cake for 2006's own “Don’t You Forget About Me.”

Don’t get me wrong about the ineffectuality of serenades or the synthetic nature of the instrumentation – the band is far from lacking in emotional foundations. Sure, the music can seem a little insensitive in its dainty cruise control, but the vocals provide the true spirit of the record. Gardner’s thin, liquid inflections and Hammel’s flat barks constantly add a unique rhythmic tension by singing over, interrupting and harmonizing with one another. Somehow, it always ends up being constructive rather than destructive for the given song’s identity. It’s as much due to this chemistry as to the Mates’ technical prowess that the album occasionally hits that glorious, not-familiar-enough sense of empowerment.

The album’s concept is an appealing one; our culture needs to get people comfortable with unabashed glee and shame-free dancing again. These days, musical fun generally takes too much work and inspires too much self-consciousness to actually be that, well, “fun.” So yeah, the Mates of State occasionally trip up or aspire to greater heights than they have the capacity to achieve, but they get a high five from me for tipping their hat to the best days of danceable pop, and taking a noble stab at bringing it back.

7


Pony Up! - Make Love To the Judges With Your Eyes (Dim Mak, 2006)

Yet another band hailing from the indie Holy Land of Montreal, Pony Up! is an all-female group that meets the pressure to produce a worthy debut with a degree of modesty and five level heads. They demonstrate right off the bat what eventually feels like an inevitable pop songwriting sensibility. As the cliche goes, first impressions will stick, and for Pony Up! the foremost distinction is the slick, borderline-adult-contemporary production that comfortably plops acoustic guitars and pianos into every track. But these instruments hardly wander, though they twinkle: if anything, the clever manipulation of keyboard timbre and use of guitar pedals (for short, repeated hooks) more strongly associates them with the likes of indie-pop acts like the Magnetic Fields or early New Pornographers. It’s an irrevocably cute and popular technique for cementing a song’s identity without bizarre shenanigans or a bias in the eternal struggle of production versus songwriting.

Still, I’d be lying if I pretended this what the most gripping aspect of the album. In fact, the cake has to go to the band’s rhythm section. Bassist Lisa Smith and drummer Lindsay Willis essentially carve a bowl to hold the nectar of the indie-pop hooks. Their muscular, multidimensional sound is not particularly unique, but for this album it substantiates even the schmaltzier moments and prevents the band from the all-too-common fate of getting lost in its own preciousness. The momentum is particularly valuable when repeated listens reveal the identifying hooks are more theoretical than definite; more often than not, the time-tried method is tweaked and compensated in the name of their decidedly inoffensive and utterly smooth melodies. So, for example, the use of accordion on “Only Feelgood” ends up sounding so utterly appropriate in its background role that one simply can’t anticipate a thrill on the level of the Arcade Fire’s “Neighborhood #2 (Laika).” It’s times like these that it’s nice to have drums and bass in the mix to act as a sort of primal safety net.

This dichotomy is strangely apparent in the vocals as well, which are shared by all five women. There’s obvious expected variation in tone and inflection betwixt them, but not obviously enough that many listeners could really distinguish them. Besides, they’re united by the appeal of their conviction, though what makes it so magnetic is tough to describe. Certainly it’s a far cry from the adorable innocence inherent in Joanna Newsom’s voice, yet it’s certainly not as unyieldingly harsh as Alanis Morissette’s. Nor do weepiness and fragility consume the vocal roles in the spirit of countless others. The weave is a satisfying balance that is resolute without being isolating; like the instruments, the thin, emotional and pretty are the subject but the strength of the backbone prevents it all from collapsing into mush. It’s the prevailing attitude that elevates the merely “pretty good” vocal tunes and lyrics (“I miss not knowing you so well”) to a more poignant level.

It’d be misleading to say the album wanes in its latter half, because they apply the formula to relative success with very song. In fact, it makes for an album with a flow as smooth and easy as any single track within it. Some might describe it as “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” and some would describe it as monotony. As usual, neither connotation accurately touches on the lingering bittersweet taste in the last few (inexorably forgettable) tracks. But at the end of the day, despite the steady decline, the album holds together as an honest collection of songs by a group that is musically adept enough to create the subtle complexity their thoughts and emotions deserve. It will be a tough act to follow, but as far as the debut’s concerned the band’s a solid addition to the community.

6.5

Posted by enigmatichowler at 10:16 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, February 10, 2007 6:42 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post

Seth Feldman - The Equistonaut EP (Self Released, 2006)

There’s a t-shirt for the upstate New York quartet Seth Feldman (none of whom are named Seth Feldman) that reads “Old People Listen To Us!” Obviously, it’s just self-deprecating hyperbole, but the premise is clear: in a country overrun by ambitious, “hardcore,” overindulgent and negligibly talented youth, one might not expect teenagers to make music that’s so, well, universally likable. It’s also safe to use the word “prolific”, being that they’ve now released two albums and an EP in about 20 months, simultaneous with their last two years of high school. One might expect The Equistonaut EP’s songwriting to feel like shavings, especially after two fine albums, but for Seth Feldman the name of the game has always been consistency. The EP, quite simply, pushes them over the 100-recorded-minutes mark with nary a misstep to date, and the five-track palette is arguably an even better format for such a single-minded group.

The consistent use of pianos is one key to their vibrant sound – comparisons to Something Corporate and Ben Folds seem inevitable, though Benn Bartishevich’s smooth vocals aren’t about synthetic attitude or nasal bleating. At his early best, Bartishevich recalled a less reedy Ben Gibbard, but at his worst seemed self-restricted to the point that the cramming and extension of syllables in melodic framework sounded positively rote. Thankfully, he now emotes more comfortably (not to mention the band’s lyrics are more apropos) and it’s not only resonant but, for the band’s early spectators, triumphant to hear his veritable hoarseness in the apex of “Running Out.” At this point, he’s achieved the level of charisma necessary to be at the center of each song. The surrounding instruments aren’t impotent on their own, but their amalgamation forms the music’s identity. Thus, on the whole, the vocals and the piano – as all the other elements – generally optimize the band’s sound rather than coming off as kitschy or cloyingly inoffensive.

Yet on this EP, such skillfully established cores are occasionally, and righteously, undermined. Production cards are played with a straight face and a wink, like they know the flourishes are a tad derivative but want to hint at just how many they have up their sleeve. Despite being home-recorded and self-released, the EP’s production scarcely suffers at all; in fact, it’s often impressive, and this is an exciting development for the band. Perhaps it was simply limited resources, but early Seth Feldman was crisp yet instrumentally homogeneous, with only scattered aural epiphanies. But now, production is finally getting nearly as much attention as their unsapped (if sometimes redundant) songwriting prowess.

Each track is sprinkled with such small surprises, but no song of theirs to date has demonstrated the progress better than the eight-minute “623,” which by the end unleashes so many pent up production ideas (electronic and glitch elements, a very Brand New sloppy-layered-background-choir, ethereal vocal harmonies, church organ) that they’ve basically shown their hand and raised their own bar. It’s an exciting track whose effective placement at the end of the EP makes me wonder if they can be a real album band rather than just a song band. Not that integrating 5 tracks contextually is as difficult as 13, but suffice to say they recognize the challenge before them, and it exponentiates the musical potential in their future from one of, at best, tapering reiteration to one with several whole new dimensions to explore and utilize.

The first words off Seth Feldman’s debut Proctor Boulevard were “I’m aware of what I have.” They’ve made music accordingly since then, modestly playing to their strengths as an undeniably talented yet often frustratingly inconsequential three-minute-pop-ballad group. This alone is all that many fans may want, but the subtle expansion of techniques, tonality, ambiance and overall urgency on The Equistonaut EP makes it feel less like an EP as a direction where there once was inertia. I’ve often hoped they’d apply their talent to a controlled variety of genres, but Seth Feldman apparently know that that can be a Pandora’s box for independent bands, and are moving slowly. In the grand scheme of music culture this is just five good songs from an obscure band, but if its comparative relevance is a beginning and not just a blip, they’ll be a band to watch – not only for Cuties but for the independent music community as a whole.

6.5


Spanish For 100 - Metric EP (SPF, 2006)

The Short Version:

The word-of-mouth element most likely to perk up the ears of any indie fan with Spanish for 100’s second release, the Metric EP, is that it was produced by the illustrious Phil Ek. Ek’s work (Built to Spill, Modest Mouse) has been key in the movement to augment controlled grit atmospherics and, more importantly, incorporate elements of country into indie music without people fleeing with their hands over their ears. That being said, emo-doing-country band Spanish for 100 might have nearly as integrated a variety of elements as Ek’s most successful clients, but the elements themselves lack much sense of adventurousness. Overlong and repetitive jams (“Jungle With Lions”, “See Now”) feel particularly uninspired next to their tighter melodies (“Go Away, Come Home”, “Fell a Bird”), especially for the latter’s utilization of Corey Passons’ feathery, high vocal range. The EP has moments of great clarity, beauty and urgency, but on the whole (and especially being an EP) it doesn’t satiate the promise of channeled talent implicit in Ek’s reputation.

6


Streetlight Manifesto - Keasbey Nights (Victory, 2006)

It’s hard to listen critically to genres like ska, whose defining traits render the most successful outputs not expansions so much as outright betrayals of the form. I don’t say this out of spite, I say it based on observation: in any branch of music, strict adherence to the tenets of a genre will inevitably limit the songwriting potential, and ska’s limitations are significant but easily explained. After all, it’s to be anticipated that combining elements as disparate as reggae and punk and retaining a coherent culture (which it does, I’m reminded shockingly often by the wealth of rag-doll Charlseton devotees at my school alone) will nevertheless yield a narrow crossing region. So from whence comes the brilliance of arguably the genre’s biggest household name, the Clash, and their 1979 magnum opus London Calling? Well, a willingness to explore the full spectrum between fiery, politically charged punk and liquid chill-out reggae, for starters. That the Clash and other successful acts like Sublime were able to see that ska itself was somewhat homogenous by nature allowed them to produce immediate and listenable albums (and provoke half a dozen Reel Big Fish fans to write me about how “not ska” those bands are, I have no doubt... no pun intended?).

Enter Streetlight Manifesto, with their song-for-song remake of Catch 22’s 1998 smash Keasbey Nights. It’s not, I soon discovered, the tearjerking tale of a lesser band’s homage to an ostensible “classic” that it sounds like. The original Keasbey Nights, in fact, was the only Catch 22 album written by current Manifesto singer and guitarist Tomas Kalnoky before he hit the road. So what’s really happening here? To me, it seems clear that Kalnoky is simply restaking his territory, making sure the glory of the original doesn’t go to the songwriters of the surviving-but-damaged Catch 22. It’s not my job to delve too much into the contexts of albums like these, and being that I haven’t heard the original, I have no right to disparage the remake. But the long and short of it is, Keasbey Nights is no classic album, because I can describe nary a single track as much more than “a good ska song.”

Which is fine, sure, especially for fans of the genre. But for anyone who listens to music critically, bands like Streetlight Manifesto appear to be strangely aware of their own genre’s limitations. They make this clear without solemnity and without subtlety in bridges and intros, touching on a vast variety of instruments and directions before launching (back, in the case of bridges) into the “real” song. I don’t blame these contemporary ska bands; it was the Clash themselves who popularized the technique with their own set of ska classics like “Wrong ‘Em Boyo.” Yet, these thematically unrelated intros are proudly borne and taken to the nth degree on Keasbey Nights. The dueling acoustic guitars and lilting irish flute in “Riding the Fourth Wave,” the choir of vocals in the middle of “Day in Day Out” and the Dashboard Confessional opening of “1234 1234,” (in which Kalnoky sees fit by that point to actually sing during the intro) are the most painful examples of the band’s apparent potential. Stylistically, and even melodically, they often outstrip the rest of the song, and yet the very idea of actually capitalizing on these directions appears to have a long tradition of mockery by ska acts.

But the fact is, the other expansion possibility they’re laughing at is that of their fanbase, because in order to not be disappointed with the excellence of the intros and bridges, one must be excited when they schizophrenically chop them short. That is to say, one must simply like pure ska more. That’s quite a different animal, and one that scarcely needs illustration. There’s no accounting for taste, but I’ve always been bemused at how much speed the music achieves without dipping too far into dimension. It’s all very treble: the undistorted chord plucks on the off beats of tinny snares, the ornamental-yet-ubiquitous brass-batches in unison, even the twangy duckfoot bass. The most substantial sound is Kalnoky’s variably hoarse sputter, which hurls theoretical hooks at the listener like shurikens. Oh, yes, the hooks are there, and rapid-fire due to the genre’s bizarre perpetually-45rpm tempo. It’s probably the root of the album’s fame. But as anyone enamored with popular music will tell you, hooks are more than a set of notes or chords, and the ideas on Keasbey Nights sometimes feel skeletal dancing the shore between two broader genres. The furthest from the shore any song ventures is to a distorted albeit silky batch of power chords on “Giving Up Giving In” and to the practically-calypso “The Tide is High” vibe on “Kristina She Don’t Know I Exist.”

“I’ve always thought [the original] sounded like garbage sound-wise,” a “Fitter Happier” Kalnoky tells us in the (weird, yes) breakdown of the seven-minute last track. But let’s be honest with ourselves here: I’ve heard ska that manages what production it needs from the sixties (I’ve got one of those record store owners who’s always saying things like “the Clash didn’t invent ska!!”) and what Streetlight Manifesto end up adorning here are the aforementioned intros and bridges, which are the album’s biggest asset for any lover of all genres. For anyone who loves ska specifically and hasn’t picked up Catch 22’s, this is a good bet in terms of consistently filling out what potential ska songs possess. Frustrating LP though it may be, it will be a valuable addition to the collections of anyone who knows what to expect, and that’s anything but essential.

6.5

Posted by enigmatichowler at 10:13 AM EST
Updated: Saturday, February 10, 2007 6:51 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
2006 Year-End List
Fuck, lists are real tough, especially in a year without an obvious "winner," but I know I have to post one just for the record. There won't be a bonanza, but I'll give a brief bit of info about each of my choices that hopefully I can expound upon later. I'll also go ahead and emphasize like I did last year that these represent this particular moment in time only, and to drive the point home I'm going to include an updated list for 2005, which is almost entirely different.

Favorites of 2006:

1. Swan Lake - Beast Moans (Jagjaguwar)

This year's beautiful mess: a supergroup side project that I fear I'll regret loving so much later, but nonetheless takes the cake for the most "moments" this year. It's also more important than my roommate might think, but I'll get to that later.
2. Ghostface Killah - Fishscale (Def Jam)

The only favorite that I blogged this year (I really need to churn out mental ejaculations a little more quickly) so there isn't much more to say. My favorite rap album of the decade besides The Blueprint.
3. Califone - Roots and Crowns (Thrill Jockey)

As someone who lauds Wilco's Yankee Hotel Foxtrot as album of the decade, I'm learning not to take the label "alt-country" at face value. An album that's sometimes crystaline and poignant, sometimes forceful and sinister, always arresting.
4. Subtle - For Hero: For Fool (Astralwerks)
Head-floodingly immediate, beautiful, bizarre and intricate. Superficially, its disparate elements of hip-hop, electronica and psychedelia may seem incongruous or off-putting, yet the genre they sum to is nothing short of a revelation.
5. TV on the Radio - Return to Cookie Mountain (Interscope/4AD)
Everyone's going on about how they finally fufilled the promise of their early work here, and I agree. Being electro-motown, it really sounds like nothing else, yet the whole thing feels inclusive and strangely familiar.
6. Grizzly Bear - Yellow House (Warp)

One name I don't hear brought up for these guys is the Microphones, but the comparison's obvious. Freak folk is an acquired taste as a source of carefree jubilation, but as a catacomb of loneliness, dread and beauty, its accuracy is unparalleled.
7. Destroyer - Destroyer's Rubies (Merge)

Can't believe I didn't mention Bejar in my NP review. He's typically been more consistent with craft than style, but most importantly those concerns are reconciled here. And even as his lyrical skills wane slightly, he remains one of the best wordsmiths of our time.
8. Fiery Furnaces - Bitter Tea (Fat Possum)

I'm worried about where these guys are headed. I don't even want them to go for the chanelled excess of BB any more; if they can continue piece their pop instincts together as well as they do here, they can be as prolific as they desire to be.
9. Love is All - Nine Times That Same Song (Whats Your Rupture)
Even if they are the Yeah Yeah Yeahs done properly, it's a surprising choice. I don't usually acknowledge angular party-mixtape stuff, but these guys instill glee instead of merely scaffolding it, which makes as moving as moveworthy.
10. Yo La Tengo - I Am Not Afraid of You and I Will Beat Your Ass (Matador)
It's not amongst this brilliant group's best albums -- if it were, I can say with some confidence it would be gracing the top of the list -- but it a White Album of hit-or-miss genre experiments that hint at some new directions. "PTHITIG" justifies the whole damned thing.

Retrospective Favorites of 2005:

1. Sufjan Stevens - Illinois (Asthmatic Kitty)
The man is incredibly hardworking and his brilliance is, I maintain, almost frustratingly undeniable. There has been a bit of a shift from the more immediately lovable tracks ("Decatur") towards ones that took a little time to penetrate my cold heart ("Casimir Pulaski Day")
2. Wolf Parade - Apologies to the Queen Mary (Sub Pop)
I think at this time last year I was afraid to be so indie as to truly love this, but it has become deceptively monolithic in my book; it is an album so saturated with clever and straightforward ideas that it remains one of the most solid straight-up indie rock albums of this decade.
3. New Pornographers - Twin Cinema (Matador)
Oh, it only slipped a little. It's still an emotional crystalization of the simple good time for which their previous albums stood, but the slightly drawn out numbers, while not quite filler, don't always beg to be sat through. That and some admittedly weak Bejar tracks (he was real fucking compelling in thier earlier two) tell me that there is in fact some potential as of yet unattained for them.
4. Broadcast - Tender Buttons (Warp)
I suppose this'd win the award for "best album of 2005 not heard till 2006" but I suppose that's ridiculous on a list that's mostly different. These guys arouse a huge amount of emotion with very little; tinny drum machines, a distorted unstable casio keyboard and Trish Keenan's fucking beautiful vocals are the ingredients that create a paradoxically engrossing yet facile world.
5. Animal Collective - Feels (Fat Cat)
Count me amongst the legions of indie kids and critics who needed this as a practically-too-late segue into their sparser Sung Tongs work. It's hardly poppy, but it delicately pampers the listeners' natural sense of aesthetics so nicely that it never feels "difficult" - just different.
6. Clap Your Hands Say Yeah - Clap Your Hands Say Yeah (Clap Your Hands Say Yeah)
Boy I really didn't think this would be this much of a grower. It's not the sort of album where I had to peel through the rubbish layers to find the brilliance at its core. It's more akin to Sonic Youth; I quite simply look upon the exact same elements that I originally heard except with much more fondness and reverence. I guess the biggest jump was realizing the guy's voice is in fact one of the most perfectly and carefully controlled instruments of melody seen in 2005.
7. Kanye West - Late Registration (Roc-A-Fella)
For the record, I think this album's almost exactly the same quality as The College Dropout, just with a slightly longer reach. Both are overlong, pretentious, and often syrupy; on the other hand, both are packed with too many brilliant ideas to ignore, help to return rap to a form of art or at the very least music, and are testaments to the man's shrewd dedication.
8. Architecture in Helsinki - In Case We Die (Bar None)
I really should have let this one on last year. I knew I enjoyed it, but I guess I was unsettled. It took some sage advice from Nick Sylvester about not concerning oneself with whether music is "serious" or "important" for it to unfold. Critics should talk; this is a critically underappreciated blogger favorite, but the whole damn thing is officially tatooed on my brain. Nay, my heart.
9. Decemberists - Picaresque (Kill Rock Stars)
This one would've been number, like, eleven last year, but I realized at the time that I didn't want to put it on for the duration, including the what I considered tedious "Mariner's Revenge." A good listen through forced me to realize that it really is their definitive work, with everything they do well neatly compartmentalized and cleanly executed.
10. The National - Alligator (Beggars Banquet)
I'll give almost all the credit for this choice to their outstanding performance at this past summer's pitchforkfest - the best of the two jammed days. I bought the albums earlier that year simultaneously with a few other albums, and didn't give it an honest listen until that riveting concert. They make some unusual production decisions, but their sound is distinct and strangely resilient to their subjects.

Personal Hall of Fame Nominations:
Rather than think about this in terms of albums to which I'm considering giving A+'s (due to the needless rating system change, 10's) I'm just going to list some recent discoveries that I consider sufficiently underrated that I hadn't been compelled to buy them sooner.

Brian Eno - Another Green World (Astralwerks, 1975)
Brian Eno had a huge influence on many current areas of music, including his relative popularization of ambient or "furniture" music, but what really amazes me about this album is how it pioneers new ideas about what music can be without losing its immense scope. It's the definitive Eno album, using pop foreplay and ambient textures to the end of a "classic" album; even as its musical elements loop, and its arrangements wander, it never behaves lost and I'm never anything less than compelled. The opening two minutes are the only two I've found that resemble the first two on the Fiery Furnaces' mind-blowing Blueberry Boat. Eno's moments of pop clarity keep his swelling ideas tethered to the ground, like the results of Lennon/McCartney without the obvious duality of two songwriters. The man's officially one of my favorite artists.


Caribou - Up In Flames (Domino, 2003)
Originally going by the moniker Manitoba, Dan Snaith's been complimented for infusing a human heart into electronic music. My reaction: What? Without the Boards of Canada digital flicker of Start Breaking My Heart, no one would feel obliged to think of this as anything but a new genre. First off, the entire thing is staggeringly organic - the percussion ricochets primally and erratically off the dense, colorful oceans of wind instruments; glass chimes nip and tickle the ear and vocals sigh in and out of audibility. My first Caribou purchase was the sloppy-in-concept The Milk of Human Kindness, which was cerebrally interesting, but never nearly as compelling as the forty minutes of magic attained here.



Os Mutantes - Os Mutantes (Omplatten, 1968)
This one's so crinimally underrated that it's almost depressing to think about. Just about everything one can say about their sound and songwriting -- linear song structures, versatile vocal harmonies, zigzagging electro-shock guitar solos, the chink and clatter of found sound percussion -- are at the core of a music culture that... still really isn't embraced by the public. I like to say bands like this and the Velvet Underground weren't ahead of their time, they were "ahead of Time," which is to say, they were champions of a style and sound that will always be life-changing and divine to a miniscule proportion of the public. I guess I'm just lucky to know them; any more transcendental underdog 60's groups and I'll start to wonder if the unity of critic, quality and listener we associate with that decade wasn't as clear-cut as I thought.

Posted by enigmatichowler at 9:23 PM EST
Updated: Saturday, January 13, 2007 12:34 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, December 21, 2006
2006 Mixtape
Alrighty here's my annual year-end mixtape. I have a zip of the songs for anyone who's interested. A few differences this year... I continued to look for songs that represented an artist the best, but definitely focused a lot more on picking mixtape-like songs. I think it really helps the flow.

Thus, the reason I have no Yo La Tengo is because, although there are many viable 3-minute pop moments on their album, the only song I could put on in good conscience is their 10-minute opener "Pass the Hatchet, I Think I'm Goodkind," it being the most beautiful, perfect track I've heard all year. But unlike Yo La Tengo, I don't think it juxtaposes well with rapid-fire pop songs.

I breach this vow a few times... for example, I really wanted Liars on there and yet every just about every track on that album is four minutes of fuckery around a tribal rhythm. I wouldn't have put it in if I couldn't integrate it, though, and that's part of the reason there's no Hip-Hop on the mix; I find it next to impossible to smoothly transition into Hip-Hop on a mixtape.

It's also important to note that this is by no means my "favorite tracks of the year"... the number is the track number I thought would fit the song best, not a ranking, and I enver included an artist more than once. This is just a good ol' encapsulation of a fun year of music. Without further ado:

1. Fiery Furnaces – “I’m Waiting to Know You” (4:01) from Bitter Tea
2. Fujiya & Miyagi – “Collarbone” (4:03) from Transparent Things
3. Belle and Sebastian – “The Blues Are Still Blue” (4:12) from The Life Pursuit
4. Beirut – “Postcards from Italy”(4:14) from Gulag Orkestar
5. Califone – “A Chinese Actor” (4:18) from Roots and Crowns
6. Swan Lake – “A Venue Called Rubella” (4:20) from Beast Moans
7. Sonic Youth – “Sleepin’ Around” (3:42) from Rather Ripped
8. Liars – “A Visit From Drum” (4:08) from Drum’s Not Dead
9. Todosantos – “A Veces” (2:11) from Aeropuerto
10. Peter Bjorn and John – “Young Folks” (4:36) from Writer’s Block
11. Casiotone for the Painfully Alone – “Nashville Parthenon” (2:55) from Etiquette
12. Grandaddy – “Jeez Louise” (3:41) from Just Like the Fambly Cat
13. Grizzly Bear – “Knife” (3:46) from Yellow House
14. Destroyer – “Painter In Your Pocket” (4:10) from Destroyer’s Rubies
15. Serena Maneesh – “Un-Deux” (1:56) from Serena-Maneesh
16. TV on the Radio – “Hours” (3:55) from Return to Cookie Mountain
17. Subtle – “The Mercury Craze” (3:51) from For Hero: For Fool
18. Flying – “Last Trick” (4:18) from Just-One-Second-Ago-Broken-Eggshell
19. Islands – “Don’t Call Me Whitney, Bobby” (2:32) from Return to the Sea
20. M. Ward – “Chinese Translation” (3:58) from Post-War
21. Decemberists – “Summersong” (3:31) from The Crane Wife

Posted by enigmatichowler at 5:20 PM EST
Updated: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:22 PM EST
Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older