


|
Welcome
to our Letters Page for
|
| Fight
back! IT IS time for the Guyanese population to fight back against the criminal gang - there are only about 12 of them. When
these criminals attack you, there is no guarantee that the miscreants
will let you live when they collect your money and jewellery. Fight
back! It is time to make a stand - spit, bite, kick, scratch, pelt
them with your cellular phone. Collect some acid and throw it on them. It
is better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by six in a casket! If
you have a firearm, it is not to gather dust in the money vault. Keep
it on your person - it is for defence and to disable anyone who
attacks you. Forget
the AK-47 and the 44 magnum the criminals have; put your front sights
on their belly button and keep squeezing. Incoming
fire always has the right of way! If
you survive you might be $500,000 richer for each criminal you
terminate. The
criminals do not like their skin to burn them. Give them hell before
the criminals try to send you there. The
Police cannot be here and everywhere to protect you. Citizens
of Guyana, fight back! Coming
second in an attack is not an option! It
is after all an honourable fight against the Indian brothers who work
hard to build Guyana. The five must be congratulated for depriving
children of their parents and for laying waste to any notion of a
united and peaceful Guyana. We
must also congratulate the television stations that help the fighters
to get their message out and we must show our support by continuing to
buy the products that are advertised on the stations and allow them to
keep broadcasting the messages of the five `freedom fighters' so that
many more may join in more pre-Mother's Day celebrations. We
must also not fall for the propaganda; after all it is only
coincidence that every time the Opposition calls for increased
pressure the spate of violent crimes against Indo-Guyanese escalates.
It is only coincidence that only the television stations that support
the Opposition's point of view were hand-delivered taped statements
from the five `freedom fighters' (maybe saints). It
is only coincidence that the activities of the five can be traced to
Buxton; it is only coincidence that residents of Buxton all know where
the five are. After all, these are all coincidences and fabrications. The
five that the Police seek are in fact all honourable men, just like
the members of the political parties that support them - they are all
honourable men. Are they not? Only
honourable men would take the time to hold public discussions on why
they should not be called terrorists, regardless of the military
fatigues and the imitation of Bin Laden. We therefore should make a
special effort to support these honourable men, the financial backers
and the companies and products that support them. We
must buy more of the products, goods and services that help funnel
money to the cause of the `five for freedom'; after all we will just
be helping honourable men. We
are after all just mere Guyanese and me, I am just an idiot who cannot
understand the complexities of politics in a post-dialogue state or
what are the undertones of a call for increased pressure from the
Opposition. I
also cannot understand why the Opposition would attend the funeral of
dead thieves (sorry `freedom fighters') if in fact they do not also
recognise them as honourable men. So
let's all join our voices and hands and show our support for these
honourable men; let's tell them how much we love their actions and may
the orphaned children all bestow unto them the blessings they so
richly deserve. Even
so, I would wager that the UN would ignore the gang's efforts for two
reasons. 1.
The UN does not harbour common criminals. 2.
The UN and all other international organisations are fully aware that
there is total freedom in Guyana and that a properly elected
government guides the country. The
bandits' attempt to surrender and the consequent rejection by the
international community will shred the mask of deception these bandits
try to pull on by peddling such atrocious nonsense as being
"freedom fighters." What
exactly are the bounds of oppression and subjugation that these groups
are supposedly struggling against? (And I am not asking about
self-imposed mental boundaries.) There
is no state oppression in Guyana and the international community knows
this. Only
idiots fight for freedom in a country that is already free. But these
bandits are not just idiots, they are social misfits and their story
is a farce to justify their immoral, evil, sadistic and murderous
campaign against their fellow citizens. It
is clear that their wickedness is being guided from a specific source.
We have to find out who is issuing the instructions and who is
harvesting the blood bounty. As
I read the news on Monday of the senseless murder of another
hardworking couple I consoled myself thinking that there is a special
prepared place in hell for these murderers and those that support
them. Guyanese
have always been a peaceful people, but what is happening will clearly
make everyone start thinking about an alternative, i.e. violence. It
is very clear that these attacks are carried out against one set of
people. Has
the Guyana Government thought about what the recent escalation in
crime would have on overseas-based Guyanese who want to take their
families to the homeland for summer vacations? Clearly
if these bandits/terrorists are not apprehended, Guyana would be
losing tons of US$ because people would go to Florida and other
vacation places. What
about those foreign investors? The
whole military force should be sent out with direct orders to get
these people either dead or alive. If
our military force cannot do the job, then we should request military
help, like special forces from either the United States or Great
Britain. From
all the reports it seems that these criminals/terrorists are being
harboured by elements in our society and the military should adopt the
principle - `if you harbour a criminal/terrorist then you are a
criminal/terrorist' and those who are guilty of that should face the
same faith as the criminals/terrorists. The
editorial states that "the PPP/C cannot go on pretending that it
is governing a nation, it cannot go on feeling that there is no
profound feeling of alienation in the African Community". What
exactly does the Editor mean by this statement? Is she saying that a
freely elected government should not be given the chance to govern a
nation? If that is the case then no democratically elected government
should be allowed to govern. If
as the Editor concludes there is a profound feeling of alienation
among Africans, then she should ask the question, whether this feeling
is justified. We
have a situation in Guyana where the majority of the positions in the
civil and teaching services are occupied by Afro Guyanese. All
sections of the security forces from top to bottom are overwhelmingly
staffed by Afro Guyanese. All State corporations except the Guyana
Sugar Corporation (Guysuco) have a staff complement that is made up of
Afro Guyanese in the majority. The
majority of students at the University of Guyana are Afro Guyanese.
Even at Cabinet level the membership of Indians is only slightly more
than the national percentage of Indians in this country. And
I can go on and on. So
how on earth the Editor arrived at her conclusion is baffling indeed
and can only lead one to believe that she is either naive or something
insidious is afoot. The
Editor goes on to state that "after three democratic elections,
the current constitutional framework has nothing particular to offer
Africans." What an absurd statement to make! Was
the Editor asleep when the Constitutional Reform Commission was
meeting throughout the length and breadth of this country taking
submissions from all and sundry? Was
she not aware that the PNC and other African organisations were well
represented on this Commission? Perhaps she has now awakened from her
deep slumber, for if she was awake all the while, she would have
realised that the PNC, which claims to represent Afro Guyanese, got
more than what it bargained for in the new Constitution. Not
to be outdone by her early illogical conclusions, the Editor traversed
a more controversial road stating that "the Police go into
Princess Street and shoot someone else under highly questionable
circumstances". As
far as can be discerned, the Editor was not there when the shooting
took place. As far as can be discerned also, the victim's character
was not beyond reproach. In fact the Police had a file on him. The
Editor would make a poor Police investigator if she would take as
gospel truth statements emanating from associates of such a character
as against the Police version of events. The
Sunday Editor should be well aware of the modus operandi of these
bandits. They do not give you a chance. If
you do not get them they will get you as clearly demonstrated in the
case when the late Police Officer Leon Fraser met his demise. She is
highly critical of Mr. Merai and his men and she went as far as
calling for Mr. Merai to be sent on leave. Sitting
in your office and writing what comes to mind, whether it is sensible
or not is easy, but in the final analysis someone has to go out and
apprehend the bandits. Perhaps
the Sunday Editor can put out a call for all suspected criminals to
turn themselves in and let us sit back and see what the results would
be. And if by chance there is not a positive response, then she can
lead a group of unarmed civilians to go and apprehend them. Finally,
let her talk to the families of all those that have suffered, as
recent as last Saturday night, and get their opinion. One
last point: we must be careful of the statements we make otherwise we
unwittingly lend credence to unjustified causes. What
Guyana is going through is affecting all of us who live here in the
U.S. I
am so upset about last week's killing of that couple. In the U.S.,
which is so big, those men would have been caught by now. The
authorities should try these simple methods: 2/
Curfew every night so fewer people are out and the Police can patrol
all over. 3/
Raise the reward the money for the capture of the bandits. The reward
should be $50M per bandit. Try that and see if telephones don't start
ringing. 4/
Bring in the military in full force. Guyana has never fought a war
with anyone so you train the military and then what? Put
their training to work - put 3,000 military out there to find five
men. This
situation is putting Guyana down because nobody wants to come home on
vacation any more. It's
too dangerous. Is X-14 plan underway? nothing new. Since 1992 the majority of
this nation has repeatedly been subjected to the "terroristic"
scheming and brutish thuggery of this gang. According to the police
there is "a clear pattern of criminal The Stabroek News reported a police press release as saying that "further information has suggested that these raids and attacks on householders, taxi drivers and members of the public are 'aimed at selected targets'. "It also implicated sections of
the media as being part of the design to strengthen the enabling
environment by their readiness 'to give views which are intended to
reduce the resolve of the Police to fight crime and to court certain
responses on their Amnesty International, much like the
Guyana Human Rights Association, seems only concerned with the welfare
of certain types of people in society. I am yet to hear the GHRA speak
out strongly against the frequent human rights violations and physical
harassment perpetrated by certain political groupings against a
specific section of the Guyanese population. Fortunately, these abused
people have never and will never look to the GHRA for representation.
|
|
|