

The allegation was made against Robert Corbin that he raped a young woman in his office one Saturday afternoon. Can Mr. Corbin confirm or deny that the medical evidence showed that the girl was bruised, scratched and suffered other injuries consistent with an attack as if by an animal?
Will the
PNC ask for an inquiry into the brutality and killings in 2002-03?
Mr.
Robert Corbin has spoken about allegations made against himself, Mr. Stanley
Moore and Mr. Rashleigh Jackson when they were all members of the Burnham
Cabinet, and that they resigned when allegations were made against them.
The matters having been brought to the public arena by Mr. Corbin in his quest
to get the removal of Ronald Gajraj from office, it is only fair that the public
be made aware of what Mr. Corbin had alluded to.
The allegation was made against Robert Corbin that he raped a young woman in his
office one Saturday afternoon. Can Mr. Corbin confirm or deny that the medical
evidence showed that the girl was bruised, scratched and suffered other injuries
consistent with an attack as if by an animal?
Mr. Stanley Moore was Minister of Home Affairs and he ordered the release of
hardcore criminals from the Georgetown Prison. Mr. Skip Roberts, the Crime
Chief, protested to Mr. Burnham. Mr. Burnham suggested to Roberts that he tender
his resignation. (This was part of Burnham's strategy). Mr. Burnham called in
Stanley Moore and showed him Skip Robert's letter of resignation. He asked Moore
to find a Crime Chief as competent as Roberts. Stanley Moore resigned and Skip
Robert's letter of resignation was destroyed.
Rashleigh Jackson's son was allegedly found in possession of unlawful objects in
the U.S.A, and a letter was issued claiming that the son was in the diplomatic
service, which was not true. As a result of the letter, the son was not charged.
Mr. Jackson resigned.
Is there any similarity to the matter now engaging in public attention at the
request of Mr. Corbin?
But dealing with the call for the resignation of Mr. Gajraj, we have seen two
statements issued by bedfellows of the PNC. The Guyana Bar Association noted
that it was a serious breach of the law to condemn a high government official
without verification and scrutiny of the allegations made against him; and the
Guyana Human Rights Association in a lukewarm statement said it was unfortunate
that the PNC/R chose to focus predominantly on the Minister rather than
mobilizing around the issue.
Bearing in mind that Bacchus has refused to attend an identification parade or
give a statement in writing to the Guyana authorities, will the PNC/R show its
maturity and lend support for a proper enquiry, including all the killings and
brutality experienced in Guyana in 2002-2003 for which no one has been arrested?
AHMAD ALLI
JANUARY 21, 2004