◄ BACK



  Religious Liberty by Kenn Gividen



In recent years, authoritarians have attempted to establish secularism as the defacto state religion. In a concomitant of triangulation, their strategy is to equivocate historical evidence while presenting "endorsement of religion" as being identical to "separation of church and state." In fact, the two are not the same.

Thomas Jefferson was a religious libertarian who, not only advocated the government’s freedom to endorse religion, but participated in those endorsements. For example, during Jefferson's tenure as president, the federal government endorsed religion by conducting church services in the Capitol building. A mere two days after writing the Danbury letter in which he coined the phrase "wall of separation between church and state," Jefferson participated in one of those services. He continued to faithfully attend these government sponsored church services throughout his presidency.

As head of the public school system in Washington, DC, Mr. Jefferson distributed Bibles to the students. Though Jefferson believed in separation of church and state, he apparently would not agree with the notion that endorsing religion in public schools constituted a breach in that wall of separation.

Our nation's founders firmly opposed the creation, or establishment, of a state religion. Therefore they wrote, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." Nor did they believe that wall of separation included the exercise of religious practices. And so, they added, "...or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

By redefining "separation of church and state" to equivocate "endorsement of religion," religious authoritarians have effectively nullified the First Amendment, reversed the trend of religious liberty in our nation and succeeded in creating a secularist state church.

By defying the evident and original meaning of the First Amendment they have unwittingly opened the door for futher abuse of this defining document. Recently, for example, five Justices of the Supreme Court approved the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) which clearly abridges free speech, as guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Secularists seem to believe that, by purging other religions from the public forum, they are creating religious liberty. In a sense they are — but only for themselves.

In 16th century England, catholicism achieved religious liberty for Catholics by becoming the state church. All others were excluded. Later, protestantism achieved religious liberty for Protestants when it became the state church. All others were excluded.

In 21st century America, secularism is achieving religious liberty for secularists. All others are being excluded.


It's a clear case of endorsement of religion. But does it violate the principle of separation of church and state?

The case in point is a letter on my desk, signed by the president of the United States. The letter was written while the president was serving in his official capacity. That is, he was "on the job." Though personal, the letter was clearly written for public consumption, in that it dealt with an issue of state and was addressed to more than one person.

His offending statements include the following: First, the president wrote that he intended to pray for the letter's recipients. Then, he acknowledged the God to whom he was praying was his "Father." Furthermore, he referred to God as the "Creator." While his words may have been intended as a benign pleasantry, the president was, nonetheless, publicly endorsing creationism.

What's more, the president continued his endorsement of religion by noting that God — the "Father and Creator of man" — was their source of protection and blessings. It appears the president believed his God to be personal, powerful and transcendent.

Granted, the Commander in Chief may have used these terms as niceties, but even in that context, he was guilty of endorsing religion. But, again, does an endorsement of religion violate the establishment clause of the Constitution's First Amendment?

The answer is "no." Here's why.

It is significant to note that the president writing the letter containing the religious endorsements was none other that Thomas Jefferson.

President Jefferson, you will recall, coined the phrase "separation of church and state" when explaining the establishment clause. Had President Jefferson believed religious endorsements to constitute an establishment of religion, he would not have made the endorsements.

More significant, perhaps, is the date Mr. Jefferson's letter was written. He penned the letter on January 1, 1802. That, not coincidentally, was the very day that Jefferson coined—for the first time—the phrase "separation of church and state."

What is more telling is this fact: President Jefferson's endorsement of religion was made immediately after he wrote the words "separation of church and state." In fact, he made his endorsement of religion literally before the ink dried from writing the separation phrase. His famous separation phrase and his endorsement of religion were, in fact, both parts of the same letter.

The letter in reference was addressed to a group of Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut. The occasion for the letter was a complaint by the Baptists that their constitutional rights were being violated because they were excluded from participating in government. The discrimination they were suffering, according to their letter, was "inconsistent with the rights of freemen."

Think about the above paragraph. The separation phrase was written — not to defend the rights of humanists and atheists to exclude religious endorsements from the public forum — but to assure straight-laced King James Bible toting Baptists that they would be included.

President Jefferson's letter is presented, in its entirety, below. Jefferson's endorsement of religion is highlighted in red.

The letter of complaint, to which he was responded, is presented at the link at the end of Mr. Jefferson's letter.

Gentlemen:

The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which are so good to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist Association, give me the highest satisfaction. My duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, and in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore man to all of his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessings of the common Father and Creator of man, and tender you and your religious association, assurances of my high respect and esteem.

Thomas Jefferson


Read the letter from the Danbury Baptists which prompted Thomas Jefferson's letter of reponse HERE



Above: President Thomas Jefferson

First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


BACK to www.KennGividen.com
Copyright © 2002 - 2004

Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!