AGAIN MY SOLICITOR HAD FORGETTEN TO ENTER A MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT SUMMONS.
BY NOW IT WAS BECOMING OBVIOUS THAT I WOULD HAVE TO TAKE CHARGE OF MY OWN
CASE. PREVIOUSLY I BELIEVED SOLICITORS DID ALL THEY COULD FOR THEIR CLIENTS.
22-12-94
I MET TO THE COMMUNITY WELFARE OFFICER REGARDING MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT. HE ADVISED ME
TO TAKE OUT A SUMMONS MYSELF. HE ALSO MADE ME WISE TO THE FACT THAT MY
SOLICITOR WAS AFRAID OF THE JUDGE AS WERE MOST OF THE OTHER
SOLICITORS. GREAT - I THOUGHT - A SOLICITOR THAT IS AFRAID OF A JUDGE.
23-12-94
I ASKED WILLIAM AND EMMA IF THEY WANTED TO GO AND SEE THEIR FATHER. THEY
BOTH SAID NO. I WENT TO THE MEETING PLACE ESCORTED BY 2 FRIENDS TO EXPLAIN TO
A THAT THE CHILDREN WOULD NOT COME AND HAD NO WISH EVER TO SEE HIM AGAIN. HE
WAS SUPPOSED TO SEE THEM FOR 2 HOURS. A DID NOT UNDERSTAND THAT HE WAS
SUPPOSED TO TAKE THEM OFF FOR THE TWO HOURS. WHEN I EXPLAINED HE
ANSWERED"WHAT THE F^^^ WOULD I BE DOING WITH THEM FOR 2 HOURS HOURS ON MY
OWN, I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO MIND THEM. I ONLY WANTED TO SEE THEM FOR 5
MINUTES"HE GAVE ME £100 AND I RETURNED HOME.
5-1-95
I MET MY SOLICITOR AGAIN AND INSISTED THAT SHE GO TO THE COURT THERE AND THEN
TO ISSUE A MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT SUMMONS.
A'S SOLICITOR HAD BEEN ON THE PHONE TO SAY THAT A COULD NOT AFFORD ANY
MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT. I POINTED OUT THAT HE WAS PAYING £270 PER WEEK IN WAGES.
6-1-95
I RETURNED TO THE FAMILY HOME TO COLLECT MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT MONEY. THERE WAS £60 ON
THE FRIDGE. THE HOUSE WAS LIKE A PIG STY. THE SHOTGUN WAS PLACED IN THE HALL IN
FULL VIEW.
10-1-95
I HAD ANOTHER APPOINTMENT WITH A SOCIAL WORKER IN THE WOMEN'S REFUGE. SHE
ADVISED THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO ACCESS ON THE GROUNDS OF:
1. NO PATERNAL INTEREST WHATSOEVER
2. TOTAL NEGLIGENCE OF THE CHILDREN
3. TOTAL IRRESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS THE CHILDREN.
MY SOLICITOR CALLED WITH A COPY OF A AFFIDAVIT REGARDING SALE OF A PIECE OF
LAND FOR £30, 000. WILLIAM TOLD HER HE WOULD RUN AWAY IF HE WAS FORCED TO SEE
A.
OF COURSE WILLIAM COULD NOT SLEEP AT THE THOUGHT THAT HE WAS GOING TO BE
FORCED INTO SOMETHING THAT HE FELT WAS NOT RIGHT. I HAD ALWAYS TAUGHT HIM TO
GO BY HIS FEELINGS.
12-1-95
I WENT TO SEE MY COMMUNITY WELFARE OFFICER WHO ADVISED ME TO GET A HOUSE
OF MY OWN BECAUSE THE COURTS WOULD SAY THAT I WAS LIVING WITH ANOTHER
MAN. HE SAID THAT THE COURT ONLY SEES ANOTHER MAN-NO MATTER WHAT THE
AGE(63) OR RELATIONSHIP. HE SAID A'S SOLICITOR WOULD USE THIS AGAINST ME. I
WOULD BE ENTITLED TO LONE PARENT'S ALLOWANCE -AS SOON AS THE JUDGE ISSUED
A MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT ORDER. HE ALSO REMINDED ME THAT THIS JUDGE WAS "TRICKY", IT ALL
DEPENDS ON HIS MOOD ON THE DAY. "
I THEN WENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE AND MET MR. M WHO SAID HIS
DEPARTMENT WOULD MAKE SURE THAT A PAID MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT.
I REALLY HAD NOT GOT A CLUE THE WAY THIS PROCESS WORKED. THEN MR M ADVISED THAT
I CALL BACK AGAIN.
13-1-95
I CALLED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AGAIN AND MR M PROMISED TO GUIDE ME
ALONG THE CORRECT ROUTE. HE SAID HE WOULD ASK THE JUDGE TO REFER MY CASE
BACK TO HIS DEPARTMENT.
I THEN FILLED OUT ALL THE FORMS FOR THE LONE PARENTS ALLOWANCE.
18-1-95
MY SOLICITOR PHONED TO SAY THAT THE JUDGE WANTED TO SPEAK TO THE CHILDREN
ON THEIR OWN IN HIS CHAMBER'S. MR M WAS ALSO PRESENT.
THE JUDGE COMMENDED THE CHILDREN ON BEING SO ARTICULATE AND WELL
MANNERED. HOWEVER MR M COMPLAINED THAT WILLIAM WAS "UNNATURALLY
ARTICULATE AND VERSED IN LEGAL JARGON".
MY CASE WAS THEN REFERRED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE-PROBATION SERVICE.
THE JUDGE DENIED A ACCESS FOR THE TIME BEING.
20-1-95
I ATTENDED THE CIRCUIT COURT TO TRY AND GET MY SHARE OF THE £30, 000 BUT AS MY
SOLICITOR WAS LATE AGAIN THE CASE WENT AHEAD WITHOUT ME. MY BARRISTER SAID
SHE DID NOT GET A CHANCE TO SAY ANYTHING ON MY BEHALF. THIS IS GREAT I
THOUGHT. I PAID A BARRISTER AND A SOLICITOR AND NEITHER DID ANYTHING. I HAD
NEVER DEALT WITH THE LEGAL PROFESSION BEFORE AND I COULD NOT BELIEVE THIS
KIND OF THING REALLY HAPPENS. I NOW KNOW AND UNDERSTAND WHY THERE ARE SO
MANY MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE.
AFTERWARDS I MET MY SOLICITOR AGAIN. SHE SAID THAT MR M IN THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE FELT THAT WILLIAM WAS TOO CONTROLLED AND THAT I HAD ALIENATED HIM
FROM HIS FATHER. OF COURSE I DID NOT AGREE. SHE SAID THAT I WOULD HAVE TO
REALLY IMPRESS THIS MR M AS THE JUDGE ALWAYS GOES BY HIS WORD. I SUPPOSE IT
SAVES HIM THE BOTHER OF USING HIS OWN MIND.
21-1-95
3:06 AM - A CAR PULLED UP OUTSIDE THE HOUSE AND SOMEONE WAS SHINING A TORCH
IN THE WINDOWS DOWNSTAIRS. I WAS ALONE WITH THE CHILDREN AND WAS VERY
SCARED. THE CAR DROVE OFF AND THEN CAME BACK AT 3:30AM
SOMETIME LATER I WAS TALKING TO A FEMALE POLICE OFFICER RECENTLY TRAINED
FOR A SPECIAL UNIT IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. SHE EXPLAINED THAT THIS IS TYPICAL
BEHAVIOUR ESPECIALLY IF THE HUSBANDS KNOW THAT YOU LIVE ON YOUR OWN. SHE
EXPLAINED THAT THEY WILL DRIVE UP AND DOWN FOR HOURS, FOLLOW YOU AND MAKE
EVERY STEP OF THE WAY UP THE LADDER A NIGHTMARE.
HOW RIGHT SHE WAS.
I WAS TOO BUSY LOOKING FOR A HOUSE TO RENT GETTING THE CHILDREN TO SCHOOL
ETC, ETC.
GABRIEL WAS AWAY ABOUT 4 DAYS PER WEEK WORKING IN THE OTHER END OF THE
COUNTRY.
23-1-95
I CALLED INTO MY SOLICITOR TO ASK ABOUT THE FAMILY HOME PROTECTION ACT AND TO
GET AN ANSWER AS TO WHY SHE FAILED TO APPEAR IN COURT ON 20-1-95. SHE SAID
SHE HAD ANOTHER CASE IN THE DISTRICT COURT. SHE KNEW I WAS ANNOYED AND SHE
CHANGED THE SUBJECT BACK TO MY SO CALLED "ALIENATION OF THE CHILDREN
TOWARDS A. "
24-1-95
I HAD TO GO TO THE BANK TO GET COPIES IF STATEMENTS FOR MY SOLICITOR-TO PROVE
THAT I WAS PAYING ALL THE BILLS. LUCKILY I HAD KEPT ALL MY CREDIT CARD
STATEMENTS.
25-1-95
I WENT BACK TO THE SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER WHO SAID THAT WHEN THE FORMS
RETURNED HE WOULD VISIT US TO CHECK THE HOUSE ETC.
26-1-95
11:30 AM A MAN DROVE UP IN A WHITE CAR TO THE GATE. WHEN I WENT OUT HE DROVE
AWAY QUICKLY.
27-1-95
A HAD NOT LODGED ANY MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT IN THE BANK. I PHONED MR M TO STATE THAT NO
MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT HAD BEEN PAID IN. MR M ARRANGED AN APPOINTMENT FOR 2-2-95 AT 2:00
PM . HE SAID HE WOULD SEND AN APPOINTMENT CARD.
1-2-95
I HAD NOT RECEIVED ANY CARD AND PHONED THE DEPT OF JUSTICE OFFICE TO DOUBLE
CHECK THE APPOINTMENT. MR M'S SECRETARY SAID THE APPOINTMENT WAS FOR 12:00
PM AND NOT 2:00 PM. SHE ALSO APOLOGISED FOR SENDING THE CARD TO THE WRONG
ADDRESS.
2-2-95
THE APPOINTMENT WAS CHANGED BACK TO 2:00 PM. MR M'S MIND WAS ALREADY MADE
UP. HE SAID A HAD TOLD HIM EVERYTHING. I WAS SUPPOSED TO BE HAVING A AFFAIR
WITH GABRIEL. MY DAUGHTER WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE MAGIC POWERS-I MUST ASK
HER TO USE THEM SOME DAY!!!. HE SAID THAT THE CHILDREN AND I BELONGED TO A CULT
/ PAEDOPHILE RING / MAFIA AND THAT I WAS SPENDING £400 PER WEEK OF HIS MONEY ON ALCOHOL.
IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE FAMILY ASSESSMENT -- HOWEVER MR M DID MOST OF THE TALKING. AFTER A WHILE I ASKED HIM WHY HE HAD WRITTEN PAGES OF WHAT A HAD TO SAY AND ONLY 3 LINES ON WHAT I HAD TO SAY. MR M BECAME VERY AGGRESSIVE INDEED.
HE SHOUTED "DO YOU REALISE THAT THIS IS HOLY CATHOLIC IRELAND?,AND THIS DEPARTMENT DOOES NOT APPROVE OF SEPERATION.GO HOME,MY GIRL AND OBEY YOUR HUSBAND." HE SAID HE WAS FED UP AND WAS TERMINATING THE INTERVIEW.
I WENT HOME DEVASTATED AND WROTE A FORMAL LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO MR M AND
HIS SO CALLED DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
4-2-95
I EXPLAINED TO THE CHILDREN THAT WE WERE GOING FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENT AT
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THAT A MAY BE THERE. WILLIAM BEGAN SWEATING
PROFUSELY AT THE THOUGHT OF IT. I PROMISED I WOULD PROTECT HIM TO THE BEST OF
MY ABILITY.
5-2-95
ANOTHER CAR STOPPED AT THE GATE AND I SAW A MAN TAKING PHOTO'S THROUGH THE
HEDGE. I JUST WAVED AT HIM. I HAD NOTHING TO HIDE. I PHONED THE WOMEN'S REFUGE
TO EXPRESS HOW UNFAIRLY I WAS TREATED IN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
6-2-95
WE RETURNED TO THE DEPT OF JUSTICE. MR M WAS VERY ANNOYED THAT I HAD
CONTACTED THE WOMEN'S REFUGE.
MR M THEN SPOKE TO WILLIAM. WILLIAM WAS ASKED IF HE WANTED TO SEE
A. HE WENT WHITER THAN WHITE AND TOLD MR M THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO SEE THAT
"SELFISH, SMELLY PIG".
THEN A WAS BROUGHT INTO MR M'S OFFICE WITH ME. I CONFRONTED A OVER ALL THOSE
FALSE ACCUSATION'S. HE BECAME ANNOYED AND PUT HIS HANDS IN THE SHAPE OF A
GUN AND POINTED THEM AT ME. MR M HAD TO CAUTION HIM AT THIS POINT. MR M THEN
AGREED THAT HE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED ACCESS YET. MR M EXPLAINED THAT IF HE
GAVE A TWO BLACK CHILDREN HE WOULD NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM
AND HIS OWN.
8-2-95
MR M PHONED TO SAY THAT HE WOULD CALL THE NEXT DAY TO SEE THE CHILDREN IN
THEIR OWN HOME. WILLIAM HAD CAKES READY - AS USUAL FOR VISITOR'S.
9-2-95
MR M PHONED LATER IN THE EVENING TO SAY THAT HE GOT LOST AND WOULD CALL THE
FOLLOWING DAY.
I TOLD HIM TO BRING THE JUDGE WITH HIM IN ORDER TO SEE FOR HIMSELF THAT THE CHILDREN WERE NOT ON ANY DANGER.I INVITED THE JUDGE TO STAY FOR A WEEK IF HE WANTED.AFTER ALL OUR DOOR IS ALWAYS OPEN TO ANYONE. HE WOULD HAVE HAD GOOD FUN.AND I GUARANTEE
HE WOULD FACE EVERY DAY WITH A SMILE AFTER THAT.
FOLLOWING DAY.
10-2-95
AGAIN MR M DID NOT CALL. WILLIAM THOUGHT THIS IS TYPICAL OF MEN - ALWAYS
BREAKING THEIR PROMISES.
15-2-95
THE JUDGE SAID THAT GABRIEL HAD TOO MUCH INFLUENCE OVER THE CHILDREN AND THAT
THEY LOOKED TO HIM AS A FATHER FIGURE. THE JUDGE FELT THAT THE CHILDREN
SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CARE BECAUSE I ALLOWED THEM TO SOCIALISE WITH GABRIEL
AND HIS MIND CONTROLLING CULT. HE SAID HE WOULD NOT GRANT ME ANY MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT
MONEY AS GABRIEL WOULD BE LIVING OFF IT. HE SAID THAT I COULD WALK THE STREETS FOR ALL HE CARED.
BY THIS TIME GABRIEL HAD CONTRIBUTED £18, 000 PLUS TO OUR WELFARE.
HE SAID THAT I HAD ACTED IRRESPONSIBLY BY TAKING WILLIAM TO A BUDDHIST HEALER AND THAT I SHOULD NOT HAVE ALLOWED GABRIEL TO MASSAGE MY BACK AND STOMACH WHILE EXPECTING EMMA. I WISH NOW HE COULD EXPERIENCE THE SAME PAIN AND SEE WHAT HE WOULD DO.
SO I WALKED OUT WITH NO MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT ORDER AGAIN.
THE JUDGE THEN CALLED IN MY SOLICITOR TO WARN ME NOT TO TAKE NOTES AGAIN IN
HIS COURT AND NOT TO REPEAT ANYTHING SAID IN COURT TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE
COURT OR I WOULD GET 3 MONTH'S "INSIDE" FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT.
I KNEW THIS WAS ALL WRONG. SO DID HE. HE THEN SAID I COULD WALK THE STREETS
AND HE WOULD PUT THE CHILDREN IN CARE PSYCHIATRIC REPORTS WERE THEN REQUESTED. ("FOR WHO?ME OR FOR THE JUDGE?" I THOUGHT)
16-2-95
MY COMMUNITY WELFARE OFFICER TOLD ME THAT THIS JUDGE BEHAVED LIKE THIS
TOWARDS WOMEN EVERY DAY IN THE HOPE OF BREAKING THEIR SPIRITS. IF HE CAN DO
THIS THE WOMEN RETURN HOME TO THEIR HUSBANDS - RATHER THAN LOSE THEIR
CHILDREN-. THEN THEY ALL "PLAY HAPPY FAMILY'S AGAIN". OF COURSE COURT TIME IS
ALSO SAVED.
18-2-95+19-2-95
I TRIED RENTING A HOUSE BUT BECAUSE I WAS A SINGLE PARENT/NOT WORKING/NO
MAINTAINCE/CHILD SUPPORT ORDER I WAS TURNED DOWN ON THREE HOUSES.
6-3-95
I ATTENDED DEPT OF JUSTICE OFFICE AT 2:00 PM FOR PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION. A WAS
SEEN FIRST AGAIN. I HAD TO WAIT UNTIL 4:00 PM AND WAS TOLD AT 4:35 PM THAT THE
PSYCHIATRIST WAS OVERTIME. ANYWAY HE HAD HEARD ALL HE NEEDED TO KNOW
FROM MR M AND A. ALL I GOT WAS 35 MINUTES OF CHAIN SMOKE INTO MY FACE.
I PINCHED MYSELF AND ASKED "ARE THESE REALLY PROFESSIONALS?. I WOULD LOVE TO
SEE THEIR WRITTEN QUALIFICATION'S. I KNOW HOW DIFFICULT IT WAS FOR ME TO
QUALIFY.
9-3-95
WILLIAM WAS BECOMING REALLY SCARED AT THE THOUGHTS OF HAVING TO SEE A LET
ALONE TALK TO HIM AGAIN. I THOUGHT I BETTER TAKE HIM TO MY OWN G. P. TO CHECK
WILLIAM OVER. HE SAID HE DID NOT CARE IF WILLIAM HAD A BREAKDOWN OR NOT. HE
SAID HE MAY AS WELL HAVE A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN NOW AND GET IT OVER WITH.
I KNOW THAT SOME DAY ONE OF HIS CHILDREN WILL HAVE A BREAKDOWN AND HE
WOULD REMEMBER SAYING THIS. WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND. I WAS
DEVASTATED. GABRIEL RETURNED AND EXPLAINED THAT IF I WANTED TO GO BACK I
COULD. "NO WAY" I SAID.
14-3-95
MY FEMALE SOLICITOR DECIDED SHE COULD NOT FACE THE JUDGE TODAY AND SENT A
MALE SOLICITOR INSTEAD. THE JUDGE PROCEEDED TO SHOUT AGAIN. HE FELT THERE WAS A CULT INVOLVED - GABRIEL, MANY BUSINESS PEOPLE, A
PHYSIOTHERAPIST , A PSYCHOTHERAPIST , SOME TEACHER'S, THE "BLOODY JAPANESE"
AND THE "BLOODY EUROPEAN'S".
I HAD FOUND A HOUSE TO RENT FOR A FEW WEEKS WHICH ONE OF MY FRIENDS PAID FOR IN CASH. THEN THE CHILDREN AND I WERE FORBIDDEN TO ASSOCIATE WITH GABRIEL AND THE OTHER'S ESPECIALLY "BARBARIAN JAPANESE".
SEVEN OF MY FRIENDS ACCOMPANIED ME TO COURT THAT DAY IN THE HOPE OF BEING ALLOWED TO HAVE THEIR SAY THAT DAY. THE JUDGE WOULD NOT ALLOW THESE "CULT" MEMBER'S INTO HIS COURT. THESE DISCIPLES OF GABRIEL ARE NOT COMING INTO COURT. THE JUDGE SAID "THEY ARE THUGS AND LOWLIFE AS DESCRIBED BY MR M. SOCIAL WORKER TO THE COURT, WHO THE HELL IS MRS HARRIS ANYWAY?".
IF HE HAD ALLOWED THEM IN HE WOULD HAVE REALISED THAT THEY WERE MOSTLY BUSINESS PEOPLE WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD'S AT ALL , AN OFFICIAL FROM THE ITALIAN EMBASSY AND SCHOOL TEACHERS. ALL THESE PEOPLE HAD THEIR QUALIFICATION'S IN WRITING TO HAND IN CASE THEY WERE REQUIRED. THE JUDGE REFUSED TO LET THEM INTO HIS COURT, THEY BECAME VERY ANNOYED OUTSIDE THE COURTROOM AS THEY WERE NOT USED TO A JUDGE OR ANYONE "TAKING AWAY THEIR GOOD NAMES. THE MOST LAUGHABLE PART OF IT ALL WAS THAT THE BUSINESS PEOPLE IN QUESTION WERE PERSONAL FRIEND'S OF A CIRCUIT JUDGE IN THE SAME JURISDICTION.
OF COURSE THAT IMPLIED THAT THIS CIRCUIT JUDGE WAS ALSO A MEMBER OF THIS INVISIBLE CULT. AFTER A FEW MINUTES THE JUDGE ORDERED EVERYONE OUT OF HIS COURT - AS HE HAD ANOTHER CASE.
ONE OF HIS BAD DAYS - I GUESS.
I REALLY PITIED ALL THE OTHER WOMEN WHO HAD TO FACE THAT "MAN" THAT
DAY. PERHAPS HE GOT OUT OF THE WRONG SIDE OF THE BED THAT MORNING. LATER
THESE SAME PEOPLE WENT TO THEIR SOLICITORS TO SIGN AFFIDAVITS DENYING BEING
PART OF ANY CULT. THESE AFFIDAVITS ARRIVED FROM EVERY CORNER OF THE EARTH
BUT WERE NEVER RECOGNISED BY THE COURT.
20-3-95
WE HAD MOVED TO OUR NEW HOME BUT THE COURT INSISTED THAT THE CHILDREN STAY
IN THE SAME SCHOOL - 40 MILES AWAY.
I ASKED MY SOLICITOR TO SIGN A COPY OF THE COURT PROCEEDING'S OF THE 14-3-95. OF COURSE HE WOULD NOT. "KEEP AWAY FROM THE CULT" HE SAID. TO THIS DAY I STILL DON'T KNOW WHO OR WHERE THIS CULT IS.
I EXPLAINED TO HIM THAT I HAD ALREADY ARRANGED A BIRTHDAY PARTY FOR EMMA AND THAT 15 CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES HAD BEEN INVITED.I SAID THAT I WAS PLANNING TO GO AHEAD WITH IT AS EMMA'S BEST FRIENDS FROM U.S.A,JAPAN AND HOLLAND WERE COMING.ALL 15 FAMILIES HAD MADE THEIR TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS.HE ADVISED "IF YOU INTEND TO KEEP YOUR CHILDREN OUT OF CARE CANCEL THE PARTY"
AT 2:30 PM I ATTENDED A CASE CONFERENCE WITH THE LOCAL HEALTH BOARD. MY MOTHER AND BROTHER SAID THEY WERE COMING BUT DID NOT SHOW UP. THE PSYCHIATRIST HAD TO LEAVE EARLY AFTER HE STATED THAT THE INCIDENT WITH THE SHOTGUN NEVER HAPPENED - EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE 2 WITNESSES WITH SIGNED AFFIDAVITS.
A SAID NOTHING ON HIS SOLICITORS ADVICE. THE HEALTH NURSE COMPLAINED THAT EMMA HAD NOT RECEIVED HER 3 IN 1 VACCINES. I TOLD HER TO PHONE WILLAIM'S SPECIALIST. WOULD YOU BELIEVE IT. HE HAD DIED 2 WEEKS PREVIOUSLY. WAS NOT I BLESSED WITH LUCK.
WILLIAM'S TEACHER - THE PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL ACCUSED MR M'S DEPARTMENT
OF RUNNING A SMEAR CAMPAIGN AND THAT BOTH THE DEPT'S OF JUSTICE AND HEALTH
WERE A DISGRACE. MR M WAS VERY SHORT TEMPERED AND TOLD ME TO
"GO HOME AND
OBEY YOUR HUSBAND". HIS EYES WERE BULGING IN TEMPER.
21-3-95
OF COURSE I WAS EXHAUSTED FROM THE CASE CONFERENCE THE PREVIOUS DAY, BUT I
KNEW I HAD TO BE IN TOP SHAPE FOR TODAY AND THIS PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION.
I WENT IN FIRST FOLLOWED BY WILLIAM AND EMMA. PRESENT WERE A SENIOR SOCIAL
WORKER AND A SENIOR PSYCHOLOGIST.
I WAS DETERMINED NOT TO BE REDUCED TO TEARS AS THIS WAS THEIR OBVIOUS INTENTION. MOST OF THE DISCUSSION CENTERED ON THE PREVIOUS DAYS CONFERENCE. THERE WERE THE USUAL QUESTION'S -DO YOU GO AROUND THE HOUSE NAKED? ETC, ETC. WHY DO SOCIAL WORKERS ALWAYS ASK THIS? I FELT LIKE SAYING NO, ONLY ON TUESDAY'S , BUT I KNEW THESE "ROBOT'S"HAD NO SENSE OF HUMOUR. THE SENIOR SOCIAL WORKER SAID THAT I WAS TOO STRONG, TOO CERTAIN AND TOO SURE OF MYSELF.
HE ALSO ASKED ME DID HE KNOW THAT HE HAD A BIG GREY BUILDING WITH BARS ON THE WINDOWS FOR CHILDREN LIKE WILLIAM AND EMMA. I ASKED WHAT HE MEANT BY - LIKE WILLIAM AND EMMA - . HE REPLIED
"REMEMBER-I HAVE THE POWER".
I SAID THAT THE JUDGE HAD THE POWER. HE REPLIED
"THE JUDGE DOES WHAT THIS DEPARTMENT TELLS HIM". A NEW ONE ON ME. I DID LEARN
SOMETHING NEW THAT DAY.
27-3-95
WILLIAM, EMMA AND MYSELF RETURNED TO FINISH THE ASSESSMENT.
WILLIAM WENT IN AT 3:00 PM. EVERYTHING WAS ON VIDEO. I DID NOT KNOW THEN THAT I
COULD HAVE INSISTED ON BEING PRESENT OR AT LEAST I SHOULD HAVE GOT A POLICE
OFFICER TO KEEP AN EYE ON THINGS. WILLIAM CAME OUT AFTER 50 MINUTES. HE
COULDN'T FOCUS/ALL HE COULD SAY WAS-"THEY CALLED ME A LIAR, I TOLD THE TRUTH
MUM HONEST, AND THEY DID NOT BELIEVE BE, THEY JUST KEPT SAYING "YOUR MOTHER
TOLD YOU TO SAY THAT". IN THE END HE SAID "MAYBE IT DID NOT HAPPEN, I DO NOT
KNOW ANYTHING ANYMORE. I JUST WANT TO GO HOME.
"EMMA WENT IN NEXT AND WAS 4 AT THE TIME. SHE WAS ASKED IF I DISCUSSED SEX WITH HER. THEY REALLY ARE OBSESSED WITH THIS THREE LETTER WORD. SHE WAS FINE - DRAWING PICTURES ETC.
WILLIAM COULDN'T SLEEP. HE WAS SO CONFUSED. HE REMEMBERED NOTHING
EXCEPT HE WAS CALLED A LIAR - HE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH. I HAD TOLD HIM TO TELL
THE TRUTH AND THAT HE COULD TRUST THESE PEOPLE. HE NEVER TRUSTED ANYONE
AFTER THAT.
28-3-95
WILLIAM'S TEACHER NOTICED HIM SHAKING TOWARDS THE END OF THE DAY AND WAS
CONCERNED. I EXPLAINED WHAT HAPPENED. HE SAID I SHOULD HAVE SAT IN WITH HIM.
30-3-95
WILLIAM INSISTS HE WILL NEVER EVER GO NEAR THE PSYCHOLOGIST OR SOCIAL
WORKER AGAIN.
3-4-95
GABRIEL WENT TO HEALTH BOARD REGARDING FAMILY ASSESSMENT. HE WAS IN SUCH
PAIN - CANCER OF THE SPINE- HE NEEDED 3 FRIENDS TO HELP HIM IN. HE WAS VERY
ANGRY AT THE WAY THE CHILDREN AND MYSELF WERE BEING TREATED. HE WAS
REALLY ANNOYED BY THEIR CONDESCENDING/SUPERIOR ATTITUDE.
WILLIAM AND EMMA WOULD NOT GO AGAIN THAT DAY. THE SENIOR SOCIAL WORKER SAID
HE WOULD PRESS CHARGES AGAINST GABRIEL. THE PSYCHOLOGIST DASHED OFF TO
THE LADIES FOR "A SWIG OF GIN". I GUESS THE PRESSURE WAS TOO MUCH. TO THINK
SHE CALLED ME A ALCOHOLIC THAT SAME DAY. I NEVER DRANK IN MY LIFE -EXCEPT A
HOT WHISKEY FOR A FLU. A HAD OBVIOUSLY CONVINCED EVERYONE I WAS AN
ALCOHOLIC. I CHALLENGED HER TO GET THE POLICE AND TAKE A BLOOD SAMPLE, BUT
SHE DID NOT PURSUE IT. I THINK THEY REALLY WANTED ME TO CRAWL IN AND DO THEIR
BIDDING.
5-4-95
I MADE AN APPOINTMENT TO SEE A SECOND SOLICITOR IN THE CITY. HE EXPLAINED THAT
A PROBATION OFFICER IN THE DEPT OF JUSTICE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO STATE IN COURT
THAT THE CHILDREN WERE BRAINWASHED.
GABRIEL DID TEACH THEM A LOT - TO BE GENTLE, TO BE PATIENT , NEVER JUDGE ANYONE , NEVER EVER LIFT YOUR HAND OR FOOT TO ANYONE. THEY LEARNED HOW TO SOCIALISE WITH EVERY NATIONALITY AND CULTURE IN THE WORLD. THEY LEARNED TO RESPECT EVERYBODY , EVERY CULTURE, EVERY RELIGION , ETC. THEY HAD FRIEND'S IN EVERY CONTINENT. NOW THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO ASSOCIATE WITH ANY OF THESE PEOPLE. SOME MEMBER'S OF SOME EMBASSIES WANTED TO GET INVOLVED BUT THE SOLICITOR DISAGREED.
THIS SOLICITOR EXPLAINED THAT THE HEALTH BOARD DO NOT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT CHILDREN.
UP UNTIL EASTER WE TRAVELLED 40 MILES TO SCHOOL IN THE MORNING AND 40 MILES
BACK JUST TO SATISFY A SOCIAL WORKER(WITH THE POWER).
EASTER
EMMAS BIRTHDAY:I DECIDED TO GO AHEAD WITH THE BIG PARTY.HOW COULD I TELL THESE PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD THAT SOME SO-CALLED "JUDGE" DID NOT APPROVE OF THEM ON RELIGIOUS/CULTURAL GROUNDS.ALL I COULD DO IS TO MOVE THE PARTY VENUE TO NORTHERN IRELAND.IT WAS A CHILDRENS PARTY SO I EXPLAINED BRIEFLY TO THE ADULTS INVOLVED WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS.OF COURSE THEY COULD HARDLY BELIEVE IT.WE ALL JUST CONCENTRATED ON GIVING THE CHILDREN A GREAT INTERNATIONAL PARTY.
13-4-95
I GAVE ALL MY NOTES TO THIS NEW SOLICITOR, AFTER PAYING THE OTHER SOLICITOR
£1, 800 (FOR NOTHING).
18-4-95
I PAID £1, 299 TO THE NEW SOLICITOR WHOM I HOPED WAS A PROFESSIONAL. GABRIEL
ARRANGED FOR ME TO GET MONEY FROM A FRIEND IN THE USA. MANY OF MY OTHER
FRIEND'S SENT MONEY ALSO.
19-4-95
IT WAS AGREED THAT GABRIEL WOULD MOVE OUT OF HIS HOME UNTIL THE END OF THE
CASE. GABRIEL WAS IN NO CONDITION TO TRAVEL ANYWHERE BUT - IN THE INTEREST'S
OF THE CHILDREN - HE SAID HE WOULD MOVE OUT - UNTIL EVERYTHING WAS
CLARIFIED. THE DATE GIVEN WAS 17-5-95. MY SOLICITOR ASKED FOR A PRIVATE
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN THE CITY. A AGREED - BUT HE WAS NOT
PAYING-NOTHING NEW THERE-MONEY FIRST, CHILDREN SECOND.
A'S SOLICITOR WANTED SUPERVISED ACCESS FOR A, HIS MOTHER AND MY MOTHER.
24-4-95
ON OUR WAY BACK FROM SCHOOL A CAR KEPT TRYING TO RAM INTO THE BACK OF
MINE. I PUT MY FOOT DOWN AND DROVE TOWARDS THE TOWN. WE WERE AFRAID TO GO
HOME IN CASE SOMEONE WAS WAITING FOR US. A FRIEND PHONED TO SAY GABRIEL
WAS AT DEATH'S DOOR. I WAS SO ANNOYED THAT HE WAS BEING PUT THROUGH SO
MUCH.
7-5-95
I WROTE TO THE SOCIAL WORKER EXPLAINING MY CONCERN OVER SUPERVISED
ACCESS WITH A.
I REQUESTED WRITTEN ACCEPTED ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY FROM THE HEALTH
BOARD. I WANTED TO KNOW WHO WAS SUPERVISING THESE VISIT'S.
Next (Part 3)