|
The Main Thing |
|
Jesus the Christ, Crucified and Resurrected |
|
By Jeff Franzwa |


Copyright is applied for under service
request number SR1-65389491. The copyright
is intended to discourage changing of THE MAIN THING. Please feel free to print, forward the file,
or distribute in other ways.
THE
MAIN THING- JESUS THE CHRIST, CRUCIFIED AND RESURRECTED
PREFACE
My goal in this work is
to help individuals in their spiritual journeys, while confessing my own
historical orthodox Christian position.
There may be a number of issues about religious truth confronting the
person considering Christianity, and a work that comprehensively addresses them
all can easily contain many hundreds of pages.
I have striven with this work to keep it short, to communicate the
Christian Gospel, and to briefly touch on key points regarding the nature of
truth, the relationship of faith and reason, the role of evidence in faith
matters, and to provide some basic evidence that relates to the theme of this
work.
I refer to "Jesus
the Christ", instead of "Jesus Christ", because the two words
are not just a first and last name, but have specific meanings which I want us
to keep in mind. Jesus is his first name
which means "Yahweh saves."
Yahweh is the name of God which God revealed to Moses when he was called
to deliver the Hebrews from Egypt.
Yahweh is often translated as I AM, which implies God's continuing
presence and power. Christ comes from
the Greek and means "Messiah."
The Messiah is shown in the Old Testament of the Bible to be a
deliverer. From the time of Jesus
onward, the Christ is seen as the deliverer from sin. I have also included the texts of the three
ecumenical creeds and a list of resources at the end. My hope and prayer is that some journeyers
will find this to be helpful.
INTRODUCTION
There is a common saying
that "the main thing is the main thing." What does this mean? It often refers to an idea or to a part of an
activity which has to be kept as the focus and done well if the other parts are
to work properly together. The main thing
often provides perspective and balance to the other parts. For example, in playing soccer, kicking the
ball properly is the main thing. Nothing
else in soccer will matter much if players do not kick the ball well. In driving a motor vehicle, the main thing
could well be to keep the vehicle in the proper location on the road. Having the vehicle in the wrong location can
be dangerous and unhelpful in reaching a destination. In many activities in which people are
engaged, much follows from keeping the main thing the main thing.
THE
MAIN THING
THE PRESENTATION
When it comes to the
Christian faith, the main thing is Jesus the Christ, crucified and
resurrected. Christianity does indeed
speak to many ethical, psychological, social, religious, and other types of
issues, but they find their proper meaning and function in relation to the main
thing.
The gospel (which means
"good news") is the message of how and why Jesus the Christ is the
main thing for Christian faith. The
Gospel according to John, from the Bible, in chapter three, verse sixteen, says
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever
believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." It is clear from this verse that God wants to
lavish love and eternal life on His human creatures, but it is also obvious
that people do not live an ideal quality of life individually or together. So
what is wrong?
The Bible in Romans 3:
23 says "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of
God." Romans 6: 23a says "For
the wages of sin is death." The
picture presented by these verses, and many like passages, is that every member
of the human race is corrupted by sin, turned from God, and unable to meet
God's standard of moral perfection necessary to share eternal life with God,
life of both endless duration and divine quality. A common objection made here is that most
people aren't really that bad that they should be cut off from God, so why does
He not just cut them some slack if He is really so loving? One answer is that we humans, in comparing
ourselves with ourselves, do not have the best view of the situation. Biblical characters who got up close and
personal with God and His holiness became very aware of their shortcomings. See
Isaiah 6: 5, Judges 13: 22, and Luke 5: 8, for examples. A second answer is that if God graded sins on
a curve, so to speak, where would He justifiably draw the line for how much sin
is too much, and would it not make heaven more like hell to admit us for
eternity with our sins? Humanity seems,
therefore, to be consigned to separation from its loving and perfectly good
Creator.
But, the good news of
Christianity is that what humanity could not do for itself, namely to solve its
sin problem, God did for humanity in Jesus the Christ, who is also God the
Son. Romans 5: 8 says "but God
shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for
us." 1 Peter 3: 18a echoes
"For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the
unrighteous, that he might bring us to God." John 1: 12 adds "But to all who did
receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of
God." So God did not lower His
standard of sinlessness and holiness, but Himself satisfied His standard of
justice in the suffering and death of God the Son, Jesus the Christ, by
crucifixion in Jerusalem two thousand years ago. By God's own act of self-sacrifice we can
receive forgiveness of sins, eternal life, and membership in God's family as
His own chosen and
adopted children
THE PARABLE
These truths are
illustrated in the parable of the prodigal son, given by Jesus in Luke, chapter
15. At the beginning of the story, the
younger of two sons instructs his father to give him his half of the inheritance. Think of the brashness and disrespect in this
demand. When do people usually receive
an inheritance? Is it not when the
parents die? The younger son is, in
effect, saying that he does not value the relationship of love, lordship, and
provision he has had with his father, and he wants to go on with his life as if
his father were dead. This is our
condition from the time of our conceptions, separated by sin from the heavenly
father who has given us all the good things we have.
The younger son soon
left home and went to another country and spent all he had on reckless
living. Since he did not delight in
relationship with his father, he sought after sensual pleasures to find meaning
for his life until the inheritance was gone.
Human beings are created for relationship with God through Jesus the
Christ, and there is no amount of anything else that can fully and permanently
satisfy as a substitute.
The now destitute young
man was forced to go to work for a citizen of that country who had him feed
pigs. This was especially humbling
because, this parable being told in the Jewish culture, the young man would
have considered pigs to be beneath his dignity to be around, much less to
serve. Sooner or later, the prideful sin
in our hearts which generates thoughts, words, and deeds of rebellion against
our Creator will leave us poor and broken in spirit.
The young man then
"comes to himself" and realizes that his father's hired servants are
much better taken care of than himself, so he determines to go back to his
father, confess his sin, and request to become as a hired servant in his
father's house. His earlier brashness is
gone, and he realizes what he has given up.
We cannot overestimate the value of realizing, by God's grace, the kind
of father He is, how we are separated
from Him by our sin, and that we can return to Him by repentance and
trust in the cross and resurrection of Jesus the Christ to receive forgiveness.
So he heads back home
prepared to take the lowest place in his father's house just to be there at
all. But his father sees him a long way
off. Apparently, the father had been
watching and waiting for his son. The
father will have nothing of his son's proposed demotion to servanthood, calls
for the best robe to be put on the son, for a ring on his hand, and for shoes
on his feet, all signs of the father's joy at restoring his son to full sonship
in the household, and calls for a lavish party to celebrate the son's
return. When we return to God through
Jesus the Christ in repentance, He not only forgives our sins, but He also lavishes
upon us the reality of eternal life with Him, He restores us to full family
status, and He gives us God the Holy Spirit to lead us into greater and greater
experiential knowledge of the Christ through His Word, the Bible. As the saying goes, it doesn't get any better
than this.
There is an anticlimactic
scene to this parable. The older son,
who had stayed home and done his duty to the father, became offended at the
homecoming celebration extended to his wayward brother. His reaction shows that there is more than
one way to be separated from the father.
The younger son sinned in obvious outward ways, and his separation from
his father was clear. But the older son
was also separated from his father, even though he lived in the house and did
his duties. The older son performed
deeds in an attempt to earn the love and favor of his father. He never understood that what the father
really wanted was a relationship of trust in his love and mercy, out of which
could flow deeds of gratitude. Whether
we have lived lives of gross, outward sin, or have done the "right"
things out of impure motivation, we can find ourselves separated from the
relationship of love that He intends.
The way back to the Father is through trust in the cross and
resurrection of Jesus the Christ.
READY
OR NOT?
It is all by God's grace
and initiative that anyone receives the gifts of forgiveness of sins and
eternal life won by Jesus on the cross. If
you, the reader, have a sense of confidence (faith) that this is for you, it can
only be because the Holy Spirit of God
has given you the gift of faith
and turned your heart toward the true God.
He has done this through working by His Word, including the Bible
passages you have just read, and probably also others you have read and heard
in the past.
In that case,
congratulations! Take a few moments to
thank God for what He has done for you through the cross and resurrection of
Jesus, the Christ. There are several
steps to take in response to God's calling you to faith in Him that will
protect, nourish, and grow the faith God has planted in your heart.
Find a local church to
join and become a participating member of it.
You are now a member of God's family, and you should find a place to
live out your faith with brothers and sisters of the same heavenly Father. Only do so wisely and prayerfully. When visiting a church, ask to see their
written statement of faith, and carefully evaluate it against God's Word, the
Bible. (A summary of the most central
Biblical beliefs are the three historic statements of faith widely accepted by
Christian churches for over sixteen hundred years, and known as the ecumenical
creeds- the Apostles' Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed. Not all churches recite these creeds in their
services, but any orthodox Christian church will agree with them. If a church's beliefs do not line up with the
Bible and the creeds, look for another church that does. The ecumenical creeds are printed at the end
of this work for your reference.) Ask
all of your questions to your satisfaction.
You also need to be baptized with water as a part of your conversion
(Acts 2: 38), most likely in the church your are joining. Baptism provides assurance to the believer of
forgiveness of sins and membership in God's family, because one can always
point back to the act of baptism and
rest in God's promises of what He did in that act. Take instruction in Christian fundamentals in
your new spiritual home. Your new faith
is a very different orientation from your life apart from God, so your mind and
faith need to be instructed and nourished to enable you to move forward in your
new life. Continue to grow in your new
faith through sound Bible teaching, receiving ongoing forgiveness and spiritual
nourishment from Holy Communion, and develop encouraging relationships with
other believers by way of worship and service in and through your local church.
For you who have already
trusted in Jesus the Christ for forgiveness of your sins, the rest of this work
will confirm your experience.
If you are not convinced
of the truth of the Christian gospel, it is okay. We are all at different points along our
spiritual journeys, and it could be that you are just not prepared yet to trust
the God of the Bible. You are encouraged
to read on and consider the evidence for the main thing, Jesus the Christ,
crucified and resurrected.
WHAT
IS TRUTH?
The best understanding
of truth is called the correspondence theory.
The ancient Greek thinker Aristotle explained it this way: "To say of what is, that it is not, or
of what is not, that it is, is false;
while to say of what is, that it is, and of what is not, that it is not,
is true." Put more simply, truth is
"telling it like it is."
Truth has practical and
life-preserving applications. That
bottle of liquid is safe to drink or it is not.
A checkbook is balanced to a correct amount or it is not. If it is eighty degrees Fahrenheit outside,
it cannot also be twenty degrees Fahrenheit.
TRUTH IS INESCAPABLE
Some people will say,
especially regarding spiritual or moral issues, that "there is no
truth." An appropriate response to
this challenge is to simply ask "Really?
Is that true?" This question
reveals that truth is inescapable. So
rather than taking an arbitrary "I can not know” or "I do not want to
bother with it" approach, it is better to deal with a truth claim on its
merits, especially one with potentially important implications. Investigate whether the truth claim is the
result of following all the evidence logically to wherever it leads, or not.
THE MYTH OF
PAN-SUBJECTIVISM
Pan-subjectivism means
that all truth claims are subjective. We
have all heard the statements:
"Well, that may be true for you, but it is not true for
me." "Everyone has their own
truth." "Truth is
personal." "Truth is
contextual." "There are many
true paths to the same god." One
will notice that the above statements make the objective truth claim that truth
claims are subjective. Is there
something wrong with this picture? These
statements, along with others and their variations, attempt to selectively
dismiss some truth claims, especially religious or ethical ones. So it would probably be a good idea to spend
a little time discussing objective and subjective truth claims as they relate
to our topic. Objective truth is
considered to be that which can be experienced and/or quantified through the
five senses, and is independently available to various people. Subjective truth is associated with inner
thoughts and feelings, and can be accessed only through the individual having
the inner experience. While it may be
true that all religions make subjective truth claims, some religions also make
objective truth claims. Pan-subjectivism
is a myth when applied to Christianity because it is not true that Christian
faith is only true in one's personal experience. The main thing about the Christian faith,
that is, Jesus the Christ, crucified and resurrected, is an objective
historical truth claim, which should be sufficiently proven by historical means
if it is true. Actually, the Biblical
Christian faith makes both objective and subjective truth claims. There are inner, subjective realities which
correspond to outer, objective realities. Many people err by restricting Christian faith
to the inner subjective realm, and failing to deal with the objective claims on
their own terms.
FAITH
AND REASON?
Sometimes we hear
objections to the use of reason in religious matters. Some of these objections come from religious
people who want to use faith to the exclusion of reason. To these objections it is quite legitimate to
ask, "Can you criticize reason without using reason?" The obvious answer to this question is
"no," so reason must remain on the table in discussing religious
issues. The relevant question, then,
is: What is reason's legitimate role?
Geisler and Brooks, in Come
Let Us Reason: An Introduction to
Logical Thinking, define reason, and the more technical form, logic, as
"a way to think so that we can come to correct conclusions by
understanding implications and the mistakes people often make in
thinking." Reason helps us make
sense of life, and to reject what does not make sense.
The great majority of
people in history have believed that some divine source is behind our
existence, sense of morals, and ability to reason through the complexity of the
universe and of life. They reached this
conclusion by applying reason to their experiential knowledge, with the
confidence that they were applying reliable reason to a universe that can be
reliably known. This confidence can be
called faith. In the place of a divine
source (God) for reason, we would have had to reach the stage of reasoning by
the highly improbable route of producing the physical universe from absolute
nothingness, order from disorder, life from non-life, personality from
non-personality, and, finally, reason from non-reason. This godless route of existence suffers from
significant problems, including the lack of sufficient causes for the resulting
effects.
Faith (trust) in some
transcendent being (God) then, seems to be the ground for reason. Reason, then, guides us if we carefully sort
through the evidence for which specific revelation of God should be trusted. This process is often more subtle than
deliberate, as we quickly and almost unconsciously dismiss options which seem
to be fantastic, like believing in the Greek gods on Mount Olympus, which loses
support as our knowledge becomes more sophisticated. Then the trusted revelation sets the rules
and boundaries for the use of reason with faith.
In Christianity, the
Bible is regarded as God's revelation to humankind. Reason serves the revelation by enabling a
proper analysis of that revelation, in theology, which is the study of God. Reasoned theology, then, has the obligation
not to make declarations that contradict or exceed the clear statements from
God's revelation in the Bible, since reason finds its origin in the existence
and mind of God.
THE
ROLE OF EVIDENCE
ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
Evidence, like reason,
is a sticky topic for many people of faith, including Christians. Many are taught to think of faith as being
contrary to evidence, and might present the idea of faith by attaching to it
such words as "blind," "leap of," or "into the
dark." But here, as with reason,
the real solution is not to reject evidence, but rather to fit the pieces
together correctly. Then faith turns out
to be an "open-eyed step into the light," cooperative with
evidence.
Evidence for
Christianity should not be seen as contrary to faith for at least three
reasons. First, the Bible makes claims
to events that are to be held as historical, so these claims seem to invite
historical investigation. Second, in
several places the Bible commands an intelligent contending for the faith which
states or implies the need to use evidence.
See Matthew 22: 37, 1 Peter 3: 15, 2 Corinthians 10: 5, Acts 17: 16-17,
Philippians 1:7, and Jude 3. Third,
there are examples in the Bible of evidence being given for faith in God. Moses demonstrated God's power at many times
and in many ways. Elijah performed
miracles as well, including his contest with the prophets of Baal on Mount
Carmel. Jesus did many miracles, and
appeared to His disciples on many occasions and in varying circumstances after
His resurrection to provide evidence for their faith. The Apostle Paul used the evidence of
creation and human reason to make his case for the Christian gospel on Mars
Hill in Athens.
Evidence for
Christianity does not exist merely so that Christians can smugly think they are
right. Evidence exists to confirm
faith. Remember the earlier section
about subjective and objective truth.
Christianity has the strength of being able to claim that its believers
have both a subjective, inner witness of God the Holy Spirit and the objective,
outer witnesses of history, science, and other disciplines. The inner witness of God to the believer is
the more valuable and essential, but God has also set up the outer witness to
confirm that our inner experience is not mere personal mysticism.
Evidence for Christianity
is also a means God can use to impart faith.
Christians believe that faith is given by God through the preaching of
the Bible, the sacraments of baptism and Holy Communion, prayer, personal Bible
reading, fellowship of believers, worship, and other means. Evidence for Christianity can be another of
these means used by God to give faith, especially when the evidences support
Christianity's main thing, the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus the
Christ.
TRUE FOR THEM
Those who have received
faith for forgiveness of sins and eternal life through the means of evidence
include some who have left a clear written testimony of their faith journey.
Simon Greenleaf was one
of the professors who lifted the Harvard Law School to its place of
pre-eminence. He wrote a textbook on
legal evidences which was for a long time a standard text, and wrote the
original constitution of the colony of Liberia.
Greenleaf was originally Jewish, and then became agnostic. At the challenge of his Christian law
students, he studied the evidence for the truth of the New Testament gospels,
converted to Christianity, and wrote The Testimony of the Evangelists.
Lew Wallace was a
lawyer, Civil War general, and politician.
A conversation with the skeptic Robert Ingersoll focused Wallace's
attention more on spiritual matters. As
governor of the New Mexico territory he wrote the classic Ben Hur- A Tale of
the Christ, perceiving more fully Jesus the Christ as the suffering savior
even as he researched and wrote the story.
Frank Morison was an
English journalist who set out to disprove Christianity through research for a
book. After his research, however, the
book's first chapter was entitled "The Book that Refused to be
Written." Morison was converted to
Christ by the evidence, and his book, Who Moved the Stone?, became a
classic of Christian evidences.
Josh McDowell, as an
atheist, was pursuing a law degree and potential political career when he
decided to write a paper to disprove Christianity. McDowell's research convinced him of the
compelling evidence for faith in Jesus the Christ, and he embarked on a career
of presenting the gospel of Christ that has included authoring or co-authoring
some seventy-seven books, and speaking and debating on countless college
campuses as a representative of Campus Crusade for Christ.
Lee Strobel, a committed
atheist since studying evolution in high school biology class, became the legal
affairs editor for the Chicago Tribune after graduating from the University of
Missouri journalism school and the Yale law school. His boat was severely rocked when his wife
announced that she had become a Christian.
Soon after, Strobel used his training as an investigative reporter on
the evidence for and against the truth of Christianity. His investigation resulted in his being
convinced that Christianity is true, and in his own conversion. Strobel later wrote a trio of best-selling books
on Christian evidences that followed the pattern of his own investigation. The Case for Christ covers the
historical evidence for Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection. The Case for Faith responds to eight
of the top objections to the Christian faith.
The Case for a Creator presents the evidence in the debate
between Darwinism and Intelligent Design.
THREE IMPORTANT TERMS
(Note: I am indebted to John Warwick Montgomery for
the raw material for this section.)
An important issue in
relation to evidence is knowing the appropriate standard to use when evaluating
truth claims. Three terms that help in
this are possibility, absolute certainty, and probability.
Possibility means it is
logical to think that something could happen or exist. Possibility rules out those things that are
impossible, such as squared circles and one-ended sticks, but sometimes does
little to narrow down a wide range of options.
Possibility, therefore, is of limited use in sorting through evidence
for competing truth claims.
Absolute certainty is
also of limited use in human experience, since the only things that can be
absolutely certain in human experience are abstract mathematics and formal
deductive logic, where the statements are true by definition. An example of absolute certainty by
definition is in the statement "All bachelors are unmarried
males." By definition it could not
be otherwise. The real world of people
and events cannot be judged by the standard of absolute certainty.
That leaves us with
probability as a standard for truth in real world settings, suspended between
the inadequate standard of possibility and the unattainable standard of
absolute certainty. Probability weighs
the quality and quantity of evidence both for and against a truth claim to
decide what is most likely true. In the
legal system, there are different levels of probability required to convict a
defendant of a crime, which are related to the seriousness of the crime and the
severity of the punishment. The claims
of the main thing in Christianity are historical claims about the crucifixion
and resurrection of Jesus the Christ.
With their being historical claims, it is inappropriate, therefore, to
require evidence for them to the level of absolute certainty, but it is very
appropriate to require evidence of them that is sufficiently probable. The next step, then, is to look at some of
the more compelling evidence for the truth of Christianity, and to consider
whether it makes faith in Jesus the Christ a most probable conclusion.
JUST
THE FACTS, MA'AM
This work will not
attempt to provide exhaustive evidence for the crucifixion and resurrection of
Jesus the Christ. Other works cited
within and at the end of this text cover that ground in a very thorough
manner. Instead, there is presented here
the key steps toward the conclusion that Jesus is risen bodily, and therefore
the true God, with some important evidential support.
The New Testament of the
Bible that we have today is essentially the same document as that which was
originally written. In fact, the New
Testament has much greater historical credibility than any other ancient
document. There are about twenty-five thousand
surviving manuscripts containing part or all of the New Testament which go back
to the early second century. These
copies are either in the original Greek or they are translations from Greek
into other languages. Throughout this
manuscript evidence going up to about one thousand A.D., there is an extremely
high accuracy rate of copying and translation, so that the minor differences
that do exist do not undermine any significant Christian doctrine. Also, the preserved writings of the early
church fathers, which go back to the end of the first century, quote all but
eleven verses of the New Testament, with key passages, of course, being quoted
multiple times. Lectionaries, which are
scheduled readings from various Bible books for worship services, also appear
early and confirm the accuracy of New Testament transmission. It should be noted that Gnostic writings,
which were written later than the New Testament books, were rejected by the
early church because they cannot claim to be eyewitness testimony of Jesus'
close followers to Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection, and because they
disagree with the accepted New Testament books.
The Gnostic writings, which have gained new popularity recently through
works such as Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, were never quoted by the
early church fathers to support a truth claim.
The New Testament
reports real history. The science of
history has found that it takes at least two generations after an event for
legend to develop, and there is good reason to think that the New Testament
books were written too early to be legendary.
We know that the Apostle Paul was martyred in Rome by the later
mid-sixties A.D. However, the book of
the Acts of the Apostles ends with Paul alive, and under house arrest. Some Biblical scholars think he went on one
more missionary trip before his re-arrest and martyrdom. Acts is, therefore, likely to have been
written by the mid-sixties A.D. That
places the earlier companion to Acts, written by the same author and namely the
Gospel according to Luke, in the early to mid-sixties. The Gospels according to Matthew and Mark
were written before Luke, with probably at least a couple of years between
each. So the Gospels were probably begun
to be written and circulated by sometime in the fifties. Some of the letters of the New Testament were
written before the Gospels. These
documents were written by eyewitnesses of Jesus' resurrection or by their
contemporaries. Among the earliest of
these, Paul's first letter to the Corinthians, teaches plainly about the
crucifixion and resurrection. The New
Testament books were, therefore, written during the lifetimes of many both
friendly and hostile eyewitnesses, who for varying reasons would have refuted
the apostles' story and shut down the new and odd faith, but they were unable
to. A very important point, which we
will revisit, is that the New Testament was written or influenced by
eyewitnesses, the majority of whom paid for their testimonies with their lives.
The New Testament
teaches that Jesus considered Himself to be God, and was very concerned that it
be understood. A common objection at
this point is that Jesus is not quoted in the Gospels as categorically stating
"I am God." He did, however,
do and say as much by using the "I AM" title to refer to Himself, by
claiming the authority to forgive sins, by receiving worship, by claiming to be
one with the Father, and in other ways.
Jesus proved Himself to
be God by predicting and accomplishing His own resurrection from the dead on
the third day according to the Old Testament Scriptures. The Old Testament prophecies about the coming
Messiah were so varied and specific, and from multiple prophets, that it would
be truly miraculous to fulfill even a handful of them. Jesus the Christ did just that from His birth
through His resurrection, including the fulfillment of prophecies over which He
would have had no control, were He only human.
Having already
established the historicity of the New Testament Gospels, we can be sure that
Jesus died by crucifixion. The Roman
executioners were professional, practiced, and proficient in their jobs. They knew how to kill their victims and how
to make sure they were dead. Two
eyewitness details that show Jesus was dead were that the Roman executioners
did not have to break His legs to speed His death, and that when they ran a spear
into His heart to confirm His death blood and water came out together, showing
that He died from cardiac rupture. Then
Jesus was taken down and put into a borrowed tomb before the beginning of the
Sabbath. But His disciples, who fled the
scene of His arrest and crucifixion in fear and disappointment, began to report
within a few weeks that Jesus had risen from the dead on the third day
following His death. They reported that
they had witnessed the bodily resurrected Christ at least twelve times in a variety
of situations and groupings of people.
The original disciples, minus Judas the betrayer, were later joined by
their arch-persecutor Saul of Tarsus, who became Paul the Apostle, and by the
skeptic James, the half-brother of Jesus, who became the leader of the
Jerusalem church. Both claimed to have
witnessed the resurrected Jesus.
This company of disciples, having become
apostles (meaning sent ones) proclaimed the message of Jesus' resurrection even
when it meant giving up some of their deeply-held religious beliefs and
traditions, and loss of family, property, and comfort in this life. All but one of the original apostles and many
others were martyred for their testimony.
Here is the key point, which cannot be overstated: they were in a position to know whether their
claim of the bodily resurrected Christ was true. They were not depending upon the reports of
others for their faith or upon the claim of a mere "spiritually"
resurrected Christ. They had nothing to
gain from their testimony. They were
practical men, not of the type to start a new religion contrary to their
tradition. They knew if they were
testifying to a lie, and yet not one of them cracked and recanted in the face
of rejection, torture and death.
If Jesus had not
actually died and been restored to perfect health in the resurrection, could
this one who had been beaten, flogged, nailed through the hands and feet with
spikes, hung on a cross, and thrust through the heart with a spear, have been
expected to revive in the cold tomb, unwrap Himself of his grave wrappings
containing many pounds of pungent spices, push the heavy stone up out of the
tomb with nail-pierced hands and feet, chase away the armed guards, make the
walk to Emmaus, then appear to His cowering disciples, convincing them that He
was the Lord of Glory? I do not have
enough faith to believe that. Jesus the
Christ is risen indeed!
READY
NOW?
Let us sum up. The main thing in Christianity is Jesus the
Christ, crucified and resurrected, for you, for the forgiveness of sins and
eternal life with God. Truth is telling
it like it is, truth is inescapable, and truth can be both objective and
subjective. Faith and reason have a
complimentary relationship, with reason in a serving role to faith. Evidence, especially relating to Jesus'
identity, crucifixion, and resurrection, can be used to give one faith, with
probability being the reasonable standard for judging the historical data. The New Testament documents, including the
Gospels, are historically reliable. The
New Testament presents Jesus as God having clothed Himself with humanity. Jesus miraculously demonstrated Himself to be
God, especially by His prediction and fulfillment of His death and
resurrection, according to the Old Testament Scriptures.
At this point it would
be good for you, the reader, to re-read the section "The Main Thing,"
and then to ask yourself important questions based on what you have read.
Have you discovered that
God the Holy Spirit has given you confidence (faith) to trust in Jesus the
Christ's death on the cross as payment for your sins, and in his resurrection
as guarantee of your eternal life with Him?
Faith that what He did is "for you" is that which bridges the
gap between the historical probability we have discussed and the blessed
certainty of trust in Him. If the answer
is "yes," take the steps suggested in the "Ready or Not?"
section. Your eternal life with your
Creator and Savior has begun.
If your honest answer is
still "no," I would like to make several suggestions.
First, consider the
possible causes of your unbelief. In
their book I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist, Geisler and Turek
identify three types of problems people have with Christianity. There are intellectual problems, such as
scientific problems based on Darwinism.
There are also emotional problems with difficult issues like hell and
the hypocrisy of Christians. Then there
are volitional problems, frequently based on the fact that some people do not
want God to inform their moral choices.
Remember that intellectual problems can be meaningfully, if not always
completely, answered. Emotional problems
seem to be powerful but do not establish or disqualify truth claims. Not wanting to acknowledge and worship God
does not eliminate His existence.
Second, you can pray
even if you do not yet have faith in the God of the Bible. In the book of the Acts of the Apostles the
Roman military officer Cornelius devoutly prayed and gave to the poor, and God
sent the Apostle Peter to share the Gospel with him, resulting in the saving of
Cornelius' household. As with Cornelius,
God can exert a guiding hand in our lives before we clearly know Him.
Third, while this work
has shared some highlights of the evidence for the crucifixion and resurrection
of Jesus the Christ, sufficient for many to trust Him for forgiveness of sins
and eternal life, you might honestly need more.
That is okay. The Apostle Thomas
required more than testimonial evidence of Jesus' resurrection, and Jesus gave
it to him, along with an exhortation to accept reliable testimonial
evidence. The texts mentioned within
this work and at the end should provide more than enough evidence that
probability is strongly on the side of the truth of the Christian gospel.
PARTING
WISH
It is my prayer and hope
that you would know Jesus the Christ, crucified and resurrected, as the main
thing in your life.
Christ
is Risen!
He
is risen indeed!
Alleluia!
APPENDIX
THE
THREE ECUMENICAL CREEDS
THE APOSTLES' CREED
I believe in God, the
Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth.
And in Jesus Christ, His
only Son, our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the virgin
Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into hell. The third day He rose
again from the dead. He ascended into
heaven and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty. From thence He will come to judge the living
and the dead.
I believe in the Holy
Spirit, the holy Christian Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of
sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen.
THE NICENE CREED
I believe in one God,
the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and of all things visible and
invisible.
And in one Lord Jesus
Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of His Father before all worlds,
God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of
one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and
for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of
the virgin Mary and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius
Pilate. He suffered and was buried. And the third day He rose again according to
the Scriptures and ascended into heaven and sits at the right hand of the
Father. And He will come again with
glory to judge both the living and the dead, whose kingdom will have no end.
And I believe in the
Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father and the
Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who
spoke by the prophets. And I believe in
one holy Christian and apostolic Church, I acknowledge one baptism for the
remission of sins, and I look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of
the world to come. Amen.
THE ATHANASIAN CREED
(Written against the
Arians.)
Whoever
desires to be saved must, above all, hold the catholic faith.
Whoever
does not keep it whole and undefiled will without doubt perish eternally.
And
the catholic faith is this,
that
we worship one God in Trinity and Trinity in unity, neither confusing the
persons nor dividing the
substance.
For
the Father is one person, the Son is another, and the Holy Spirit is another.
But
the Godhead of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit is one: the
glory equal, the majesty
coeternal.
Such
as the Father is, such is the Son, and such is the Holy Spirit:
the
Father uncreated, the Son uncreated, the Holy Spirit uncreated;
the
Father infinite, the Son infinite, the Holy Spirit infinite;
the
Father eternal, the Son eternal, the Holy Spirit eternal.
And
yet there are not three eternals, but one eternal,
just
as there are not three Uncreated or three Infinites, but one Uncreated and one
Infinite.
In
the same way, the Father is almighty, the Son almighty, the Holy Spirit
almighty;
and
yet there are not three Almighties but one Almighty.
So
the Father is God, the Son is God, the Holy Spirit is God;
and
yet there are not three Gods, but one God.
So
the Father is Lord, the Son is Lord, the Holy Spirit is Lord;
and
yet there are not three Lords, but one Lord.
Just
as we are compelled by the Christian truth to acknowledge each distinct person
as God and Lord,
so
also are we prohibited by the catholic religion to say that there are three
Gods or Lords.
The
Father is not made nor created nor begotten by anyone. The Son is neither made
nor created nor
begotten but proceeding.
Thus,
there is one Father, not three Fathers; one Son, not three Sons; one Holy
Spirit, not three Holy Spirits.
And
in this Trinity none is before or after another; none is greater or less than
another;
but
the whole three persons are coeternal with each other and coequal so that in
all things, as has been
stated above, the Trinity in Unity and
Unity in Trinity is to be worshiped.
Therefore,
whoever desires to be saved must think thus about the Trinity.
But
it is also necessary for everlasting salvation that one faithfully believe the
incarnation of our Lord Jesus
Christ.
Therefore,
it is the right faith that we believe and confess that our Lord Jesus Christ,
the Son of God, is at
the same time both God and man.
He
is God, begotten from the substance of the Father before all ages; and He is
man, born from the
substance of His mother in this age:
perfect
God and perfect man, composed of a rational soul and human flesh;
equal
to the Father with respect to His divinity, less than the Father with respect
to His humanity.
Although
He is God and man, He is not two, but one Christ:
one,
however, not by the conversion on the divinity into flesh but by the assumption
of the humanity into
God;
one
altogether, not by confusion of substance, but by unity of person.
For
as the rational soul and flesh is one man, so God and man is one Christ,
who
suffered for our salvation, descended into hell, rose again on the third day
from the dead,
ascended
into heaven, and is seated at the right hand of the Father, from whence He will
come to judge the
living and dead.
At
His coming all people will rise again with their bodies and give an account
concerning their own deeds.
And
those who have done good will enter into eternal life, and those who have done
evil into eternal fire.
This
is the catholic faith; whoever does not believe it faithfully and firmly cannot
be saved.
SOURCES AND FOR FURTHER READING
SMALL
BOOKS
Bruce,
F.F. The New Testament Documents- Are
They Reliable?
McDowell,
Josh. More Than a Carpenter
Montgomery,
John W. History and Christianity
MEDIUM-SIZED
BOOKS
Geisler,
Norman and Brooks, Ronald. Come, Let
Us Reason: An Introduction to Logical
Thinking
Habermas,
Gary and Licona, Michael. The Case
for the Resurrection of Jesus
Lewis,
C.S. Mere Christianity
Strobel,
Lee. The Case for Christ
Zacharias,
Ravi. Can Man Live Without God
BIG
BOOKS
Colson,
Charles and Pearcey, Nancy. How Now
Shall We Live?
Geisler,
Norman and Feinberg, Paul. Introduction
to Philosophy, A Christian Perspective
Geisler,
Norman and Turek, Frank. I Don't Have
Enough Faith to be an Atheist
McDowell,
Josh. The New Evidence that Demands a
Verdict
Pearcey,
Nancy. Total Truth: Liberating Christianity from Its Cultural
Captivity
HELPFUL
WEBSITES
www.PleaseConvinceMe.com
is a
very well organized website with lots of Christian evidences presented in a
question and answer format. The person
most behind this site is a former police detective who did his own
investigation of the evidence for Christianity, was converted, and became a
Christian pastor.
www.str.org
is the
website of Stand to Reason Ministries.
There are many helpful articles on a wide range of topics in the areas
of ethics, values and religion. There
are also links to listen to their two-hour weekly radio program either live or
by downloading archived files.
www.ccci.org/wij/index.aspx
is a presentation from Campus Crusade for Christ which helps one
to think through the process of Christian conversion.
All
Scripture quotations are from the English Standard Version.