Moments in the Life of Death Quaker, Hippie Gamer Grrl
« September 2007 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
anime
Comics
dreams
Gaming
Hon
Joys
Memes & quizzes
Politics and such
Quaker thoughts
Web site stuff
Control Panel
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View other Blogs
RSS Feed
View Profile
Death Quaker's Realm of Love, Joy, and Mass Destruction
Main Page (please include in your links to me)
Writings
Pictures
Anime
Gaming
About
You are not logged in. Log in
Thursday, 13 September 2007
Peace and Politics
Mood:  not sure
Topic: Politics and such

On Tuesday, Baltimore's Women in Black (a peace activist group) had their annual "Peace Path." Everyone was invited to stand on Charles Street with banners and signs calling for troop withdrawal. They've done this every year for the past couple years on 9/11. The idea is to pray for peace on the anniversary of such a tragic event. The vigil is carried out quietly and respectfully.

I stood out briefly with them last year, and again this year after work (it takes place during evening rush hour, so lots of people in cars can see you). I've also occasionally taken part in some other vigils held by the meeting house on the same particular strip of Charles Street I stood on Tuesday.

But we've never had quite such an overwhelming positive response before, I don't think. Nearly every car seemed to pass us by with waving passengers, supportive honks, and smiles. Bus drivers saluted us. Pedestrians gave us big waves and thumbs up.

Baltimore is theoretically pretty liberal... but when you think about it, at this time of day, most of the cars passing by are commuters heading back home to the county, where political views tend to run more moderate to somewhat conservative. If it's those folks who are more willing to show their support to end the war and withdraw troops, that's a sign of change right there. Opposition is turning to apathy, apathy is turning to hoots of support for peace.

If only we could gather enough people who care to get the President to sit up and notice. It's a democracy. He works for us. Let's make him do what we pay him to do. (Maybe we are. The bill everyone's looking at is certainly a step in the right direction.)

But in other news.... apathy still definitely reigns supreme within the city limits. All the people who seem to care drive home elsewhere.

What am I talking about? We had our local city primary on Tuesday as well.

28% of voters turned out. Twenty-eight-freakin'-percent.

Look, I love this city. I voluntarily moved here, when there're lots of other places I could've gone. But no one is blind enough to not know that Baltimore has serious problems. Crime is rampant. The schools are a freaking wasteland. People should want to change this. But with nearly no voter turnout, the same damn people who've been sitting with their heads up their rear ends have just been reelected. (And understand here, this is the democratic primary. It's not even voting along party lines that's the problem here (that's just what happens during the general election.))

I don't care if the other 70% of voters might've voted in the same people who got elected. We have two tangible duties in this democracy of ours: pay taxes and vote. Voting is not hard. Takes a few seconds.

The idea that the majority of people in Baltimore seem happy with the status quo just bothers me beyond what I can express. And I realize that's probably not why people haven't gotten to vote. Maybe there needs to be a new effort towards voter education. I wonder how one would go about pushing for that. Maybe I'll go find out.  


Posted by Death Quaker | Post Comment | View Comments (5) | Permalink | Share This Post
Updated: Thursday, 13 September 2007

Friday, 14 September 2007 - 09:30 EDT

Name: "Ericka"

I think it's not that they don't care. I think it's that most people in Baltimore think they can't make a difference. Baltimore hasn't been served very well by either party in a long time. The people who keep getting re-elected are Democrats. They are so complacent that during one election during which I was volunteering, they didn't even bother to write down the numbers earned by all the opponents in the election. They know they're going to win. They know that most people are so downtrodden they don't even vote. There's not much of an impetus to do anything, therefore. It's lame and it's stupid. 

 I guess mostly, I'm saying: I know what you mean, and it is frustrating. 

 -E 

Friday, 14 September 2007 - 16:21 EDT

Name: "DQ"

No, no, no, no, you see: this was the Democratic PRIMARY. You're right -- only the Democrats get voted for in major elections, or at least that's the case since about 1963--that's why this election was so important. In Baltimore's particular case, it's more important than the actual general election. We basically get to pick WHICH Democrat is going to be on the bill in November. 

But the same Democrats who have accomplished little got voted back in, rather than some new faces who have fresh ideas and enthusiams for the city. Which means these same lumpheads are going to be the ones voted in in November (unless the Green Party or Republicans make some historically amazing campaign).

In particular, there was the Mayoral selection which was important. Even on the news, they're like, "So, Sheila Dixon was elected the Democratic candidate for mayor. That means she'll be elected as Mayor in November." They don't even give a thought to the idea of a Republican (or any other) challenger having a chance.

So this election, with about 5 different Democrats vying for the Mayoral candidate slot, was basically us choosing the Mayor. And we chose the kinda wishy washy lady we've had as our interim mayor the past few months. Whoopty woo. (Mind you, I voted for someone who probably wouldn't have won anyway, but still.)

I am very curious to know if everyone in Baltimore had voted, if the results would have been the same.

Sunday, 16 September 2007 - 10:06 EDT

Name: "Dasquish"

This primary was decided by the media before it started. "Shiela dixon, well positionsed to become the next mayor of baltimore" and "Shiela Dixon is shown leading Mr. Sarbanes in the polls by a large margin". Voter apathy at not being able to really tell one candidate from another did the rest of the work.

 On the upside, Mark Steiner did a great job this year of letting all the candidates have their say, but even then it was pretty obvious that either Dixon or Sarbanes (basically the same candidate, only one had a penis) was going to take it. They both even had the same stale talking points, used the same words, and basically sounded like they practiced the same speeches.

Jill Carter was my candidate of choice from the Democrats, but I knew that wasn't going to happen because I agreed with almost everything she said, and I'm a registered libertarian. I hope that I am very upset that once again the green party didn't even both putting up a candidate ofor the real election in November.  When are the third parties going to realize they can't depend on winning national offices until they get some real local offices under their belt. All it would take is a democratic leaning green candidate that could get people to the polls. 

 As for voter turnout, once a candidate becomes "frontrunner" for more than a month right before the race, most people shut off knowing tht the candidate who had their name said the most is going to win. This is a standard problem with a democratic republic.  Icould go on for pages about how my own apathy kept me from voting for so many years because I didn't like ANY of the candidates, but I'm going to stop here for now. 

Sunday, 16 September 2007 - 10:08 EDT

Name: "Dasquish"

* I hope that Ms. Dixon took some of the ideas that Ms. Carter put out there, but I'm not holding my breath for any kind of change in direction from the voters or the people they elect. I am very upset...

 

This thing needs an edit function. 

Sunday, 16 September 2007 - 19:39 EDT

Name: "DQ"

Keiffer Mitchell was Dixon's primary opponent. And he was a complete asshole, so even though I didn't really want Dixon (I voted for Carter) I'm glad Mitchell didn't get it, even moreso.

Sarbanes was Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's opponent for President of City Council, and Blake won by a much narrower margin--that one really could have gone either way. I imagine Sarbanes will do well in whatever next election he runs in.

View Latest Entries