| A+ to A- | B+ to B- | C+ to C- | D+ to D- | F | ||
| 1 | Clearly stated, detailed, and appropriate thesis | Thesis is appropriate to the topic and clearly stated | Contains a thesis, but may not be entirely appropriate or clearly stated | Fails to state a clear thesis or thesis demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic | Thesis not stated or inappropriate to the topic | |
| 2 | Introduction is well-written and adequately previews the main points of the essay | Adequately previews the main points of the essay | Introduction previews most of the main points of the essay (may contain some inappropriate information or poor writing) | Introduction fails to preview the essay, is unclear, or contains inappropriate/irrelevant information | ||
| 3 | Possesses a meaningful conclusion that is not redundant | Possesses a meaningful conclusion | Possesses only a simplistic conclusion that does not add value to the essay | Conclusion is unclear and/or not closely related to the thesis | Totally lacks a conclusion | |
| 4 | Fully responds to the question and includes no irrelevant information | Covers major topics (may not give appropriate development to all topics or omit some areas) | Omits one or more topics and/or includes irrelevant information | Omits several major topics | Omits all major topics | |
| 5 | Easily identifiable, outstanding main points (good topic sentences) | Identifiable and appropriate main points | One or more main points may not be clearly stated, appropriate, or understandable | Main points are often not clear, appropriate, or easily identifiable | Main points are not clear or easily identifiable | |
| 6 | Main points are extensively defended/supported with well-chosen evidence | All main points are defended/supported | Not all main points are adequately defended/supported | Main points are often poorly supported or undefended with evidence | Main points are poorly supported or undefended with evidence | |
| 7 | Free from all factual errors and false implications | Free from major factual errors and false implications | Contains one or more significant factual errors | Contains factual errors that cast doubt on the student's understanding of the material | Contains significant factual errors that cast doubt on the student's understanding of the material | |
| 8 | Argument is clear and convincing | Argument is generally clear and convincing but has some deficiencies | Argument supports the thesis but has major deficiencies | Argument generally fails to support the thesis | Argument is totally unconvincing | |
| 9 | Shows a consistent effort to analyze as well as explain events | Makes an effort to include analysis as well as explanation | Purely Explanatory | |||
| 10 | Writing is well organized and easy to follow | Writing is generally well-organized and easy to follow (may include some awkward areas) | Some portions are poorly organized and/ or include unclear areas, poor word choices, repetitiveness, or awkwardness | Writing is often unclear, repetitive, or awkward | Writing is unclear or awkward | |
| 11 | Free of writing errors or errors are extremely insignificant | Free of most writing errors | Contains several easily avoidable writing errors | Contains numerous writing errors that detract from the understanding of the essay | Contains numerous significant writing errors that detract from the understanding of the essay | |
| Essay Grade = | Writing Errors Checklist | Conjunctions | Cap./Punctuation | Tense | ||
| Lost Points = | Omissions | Subject-verb agreement | Third Person | |||