The Flat Earth Society and Common Protestant Logic


" Click here: 10 SOBERING QUESTIONS FOR THE ERNEST BELIEVER: Discover the verses most likely not underlined in your Bible and often overlooked in Protestant churches and seminaries"

The 3rd Unanswered Challenge for Protestant Theology: Is Catholic theology Apostolic? Name just one doctrine that isn't.



Do Protestants believe the Earth is Flat?



Of course not!
But is that the logic they use?

What if a member of the "Flat Earth Society" told you the world was flat. They believed it was flat, and no matter what you said,,,or what *Overwhelming* evidence you presented to the contrary,
they continued to believe the world was flat.

They would not listen to any logic or the overwhelming evidence. They still maintained it was flat based on their "private interpretation" of what they see.
This is the logic Protestants use when they try to claim that Protestant theology is Apostolic. I.e. the teachings of the Apostles and the early Church.

Logically, Protestant theology can only be true if one holds to the position that the Apostles taught Protestant theology during the 1st century, and not one Christian soul taught it again for 1500+ years until the enlightened ideas of the Renaissance. For between these two periods of 1500+ years, Christian history is silent on these ideas.
Protestant theology can be claimed to be Apostolic, i.e., the teachings of the Apostles to the early Church only if one holds to this scenario.
Is this your position?

After failing to answer the 3 Challenges to the Validity of Protestant Theology, this is always the argument that they present.

"3 Unanswered Challenges to the Validity of Protestant Theology"

They say: "I don't care what Christians have believed for 2000 years, The Bible says this or the Bible says that,,,, I can't prove the Apostles taught as I claim, but just believe me because I said so...."
Isn't that the logic the Mormons and the JW's use?

My friends, just as there is zero documentation or supporting evidence that the world is *flat*,,, there is zero documentation or supporting evidence that Protestant theology *predates* the Renaissance, yet both reject all evidence to the contrary and maintain their position,,,, NO MATTER WHAT. Why? This is crazy, illogical and not honest in the appraisal of the evidence. It is thinking one's emotions rather than with one's intellect

Both groups keep saying over and over when confronted:
-The world is flat!--I don't care about your evidence
-Protestant Theology is Apostolic!--I know I can't find one Christian soul who taught it before the renaissance but it's Apostolic!
-The world is flat.--It's my interpretation and I KNOW I'm right. I can't prove it but I KNOW I'm right!
-Sola Scriptura is Biblical! I know I can't find the Sola in the Sola Scriptura, but it HAS to be Biblical. I KNOW I'm right. I can't prove it but I KNOW I'm right!
-"We don't need any of your historical evidence to the contrary, we can interpret things for ourselves!"

It's the same logic: We KNOW we are right, 'No Matter What' overwhelming evidence there is to the contrary."

Look at the evidence my friend.
The world is not flat and no Protestant Doctrine precedes the renaissance and believe it or not, there really IS no Sola in Sola Scriptura Biblically.
And if Protestant theology (to include Sola Scriptura) doesn't precede the Renaissance,,,,
How on (flat) earth could it have been taught by the Apostles to the early Church???

If you don't want to accept Catholic theology right now, that is OK.
But,
you must reject Protestant theology for all evidence shows it was invented during the Renaissance and beyond.
This is a historical fact. It doesn't precede the latter half of the second millennium. You cannot find ONE Christian Soul who taught Protestant Theology before the Renaissance.
And if it wasn't taught before the renaissance,,,,how could the Apostles have taught it???

Is that truth? Or is that wishful thinking.

Again, don't accept Catholic theology right now if you would rather not, but at the same time don't' accept a theology you know was invented in the last couple hundred years.
You do want to believe as the Apostles taught the early Church don't you?
If your theology is really true. Then take the challenge.

"3 Unanswered Challenges to the Validity of Protestant Theology"

If it is not true, Reject it as a modern invention and not the teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ.
If you are so confident your theology was taught by the Apostles and the Early Church, take the challenge. Please do not be afraid of what you might discover.
Gal 1:8-9 "As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that you have received, let him be accursed."

Protestantism is not Apostolic anymore than the earth is flat my friend, there is too much evidence against it.
(Or lack of evidence for it).
It's not what the Apostles taught. It's not the way it happened.

If you can't answer the Challenges, forward the site to your Pastor. If you think he can answer these questions, have him contact me at INRI33AD@aol.com

"If we sin deliberately after receiving knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains sacrifice for sins 27 but a fearful prospect of judgment and a flaming fire that is going to consume the adversaries." Hebrews 10:26

"Return to Homepage"

Email: INRI33AD@aol.com