|
Bogged
Down in Blogs
July 21, 2004
Digital Journal
By Mike Drach
Digital Journal — Imagine a pitch-dark
bedroom somewhere in suburbia, with furnishings and decorations as distraught
as its absent inmate. It is chaotically strewn with rumpled clothes,
armbands, teen magazines and Avril Lavigne paraphernalia. Suddenly, a gaunt figure thunders
into the room and plunks down on a desk chair. Tears of rage begin to swell
in her eyes, which glow in the reflection of her monitor — now the only light
source in the room. She furiously pecks at her keyboard and unleashes her
heart’s confession, a tale of dejection and woe.
“SO mad!” she writes. “My stupid Mazda is Dead again!! been
in the shop for 3 days... but the mechanics dunno
what the diagnosis is! Damn those dumb *bleep* rip-off mechanics! DAMN THEM TO
HELL!! Well now my daddy rented a Hyundai for me to drive for now. *sigh*
cheap *bleep* car.. no
power what so ever!”
Welcome to the histrionic world of weblogging.
In December 1997, Jorn Barger started up a website
called “Robot Wisdom.” There wasn’t much to it, just a plain, text-driven
page featuring regularly updated links to news stories with occasional
commentary. Sites like these had been around for several years, but Barger’s
had one distinction: It was the first to call itself a “weblog.”
Six years later, weblogs, or “blogs,”
number in the millions and have revolutionized the way we look at
communications. Blogs have sprung up to cover
nearly every possible topic, each swarming with thousands of viewpoints.
They’ve hatched a spreading online culture (or perhaps cult), alternately
launched and destroyed careers, attracted the attention of businesses and
governments worldwide and very likely changed the course of politics and the
media for good. You’re probably familiar with the concept of blogs by now and perhaps have encountered a few, but
don’t regularly read them. That’s certainly forgivable.
Bloggers, and others residing within the blogosphere, have been lamenting the decline of blog quality since the trend exploded in the summer of
1999. The majority of blogs up to that point were
highly edited and timely sites, linking obscure or interesting stories
accompanied by witty, irreverent commentary. But new Web-based software tools
launched by Pitas, Blogger and Groksoup
made it simple for anybody to start one. Soon there were thousands, often
taking the format of a public diary: Self-referential,
stream-of-semi-consciousness, slang-riddled stories of how so-and-so’s day
went, frequently with trendy, self-diminishing use of the lower case, “innovative”
spelling and capitalization, stomach-churning page design and unnerving
hypertext temper tantrums.
But things changed once again, as they were in the habit of doing after 9/11.
Soon after the World Trade Center was struck, throngs of people inundated online media sites seeking
updates, causing servers to crash under the weight of all the traffic.
However, several New
York City blogs offering first- or second-hand accounts of the
attacks began getting far more hits than usual because they could supplement,
update or simply recycle stories generated by the mass media.
Blogs, for better or for worse, have gained more
legitimacy since then. Along with ubiquitous, often damning critiques of
George W. Bush’s adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq, the blogging community
is partly credited with the recent media assassinations of such characters as
retired Republican leader Trent Lott and similarly unemployed New York
Times editor Howell Raines. Whereas mainstream media would have soon
forgotten these stories in the wake of something sexier, bloggers
diligently resuscitated the issue until justice — or at least some conception
thereof — was realized.
As popular as blogging may seem (no authoritative
statistics exist, but there’s assumed to be about a million active blogs and twice as many inactive ones), they’re a
relatively minor blip on Internet radar. When you consider that Google indexes more than three billion sites on any given
day, the number of bloggers and their readership
is, as Pew Research put it, “statistically insignificant.” Not surprisingly,
this brush-off stirred up much indignation in the blogging
community, who reminded each other that even four per cent of surfers looking
blogwards for news is a
huge accomplishment. Blogging’s influence and presence
on the Web is actually uncanny.
What is it about blogs that makes them pop up so
consistently at the top of search engine requests, no matter what the topic?
That’s a question that puzzled Google’s
technicians, until they announced last May their intention to help mitigate
the collective uproar created by millions of blog
pages. Google created the “Groups” tab shortly
after acquiring Deja’s newsgroup service, which
filters Usenet posts from the main index. The announcement to fix the blog problem — likely caused by extensive and incestuous hyperlinking within the weblogging
community, not to mention the frequency in which these amaranthine archives
of text are indexed — quickly followed Google’s
acquisition of Blogger, the popular weblog authoring software and hosting service.
Potentially, this would not only serve the blogophobes,
frustrated by the apparent dearth of reputable information on the Web, but it
could also help enthusiasts to wade through the ever-swelling weblog pool.
Until Google accomplishes this, however, there are
already a few ways to navigate the blogosphere.
Centralized news aggregators like Daypop, Technorati, and MIT’s Blogdex
use spider applications to index popular weblogs,
track hyperlinks and check for updates. Some, like Blogdex,
use search algorithms similar to Google’s, ranking
individual entries according to how frequently bloggers
link to them. This is meant to give a snapshot of what people are talking
about. In this system, righteous attacks on the Recording Industry Association
of America, wartime paranoia, celebrity gossip, “news of the wacky” and the
latest anime-parodying Flash games are all treated with equal importance.
Then you have the personal RSS aggregators, programs like Amphetadesk
or Syndirella, which automatically update you
whenever a website posts new content. RSS, an XML dialect that either stands
for Rich Site Summary or Really Simple Syndication, is often incorporated
into weblogs to make them more widely reproducible.
It’s a bit like the short-lived “push” technology of the late ‘90s, in that
they can automatically dump content onto your desktop. But so far, RSS
readers are less bloated and more customizable than the once-popular
PointCast news streamer.
These services, combined with emerging trends like mobile blogging
(“moblogging”) and the increased use of multimedia
in blogs, have created the potential for a sort of
electronic meta-consciousness to arise. As thoughts are transmitted freely
and instantly between individuals, a phenomenon almost like telepathy begins
to take shape. Some have compared it to the collective hive-mind arrangement
of the “Borg,” a fictional race of cyber-netic
drones who used to give the USS Enterprise a hard time.
John Hiler, a reporter working the oft-spurned blog beat, advanced this notion with an essay entitled
“We are the Blogs. Journalism will be Assimilated.”
The blogging collective, he says, always manages to
unleash breaking stories and discuss its issues to death, before the
traditional media can even get it printed. Whether they’re accurate,
objective, snappily written — that’s another story.
“The quality of a blog itself is questionable
compared to traditional journalism,” says Robin Ward, a computer programmer
and Toronto weblogger. “There are bloggers out there who really
edit things and produce well-written stuff, but for the most part, it’s
a thought dump; hit ‘send’ and it’s out there for the world to see.”
Ward says blogs are akin to emails: Sloppily
written, but they get to the point. He took up blogging
about two years ago, mostly because he was already prone to recapping
weekends to friends through email, or sharing interesting links. He never
kept a journal before that, and he certainly had no aspirations to be a
journalist, unlike many bloggers. But in some
cases, they’re arguably one and the same.
Several newspapers incorporate blogging elements
into their online entities, such as The Guardian and the San Jose
Mercury News. And then there are some journalists, typically casualties
of the tech-sector massacre, who have managed to earn a living by starting
independent news weblogs. The former editor of Silicon
Alley Reporter, Rafat Ali, said he was slated
to pull in between $60,000 and $80,000 (US) in advertising and sponsorship last year, through
his self-published online newsletter PaidContent.
While getting paid to blog is a relatively novel
idea, there are other ways of making it at least self-sufficient. Some cover
their hosting costs by becoming Amazon affiliates and making a few bucks in clickthrough commission, and others sell merchandise like
T-shirts and coffee mugs. Some claim to make pretty decent coin through
voluntary reader handouts, whereas others — the so-called “blogwhores” — compose wish lists, appealing for gifts
like DVDs, cameras and puppies, which are occasionally gratified. Owning a webcam (and perhaps a belly button ring) usually helps
drive donations.
Rebecca Blood, a San
Francisco
writer/blogger, also has a wish list, except hers
asks readers to donate to various worthy causes. Blood is an old-school blogger — at it since 1999 — and her prowess attracted
enough attention to land a book deal. In autumn 2001, Perseus
Publishing asked her to write The Weblog
Handbook, and it was released two years later to
much acclaim.
While Blood concedes that most weblogs seem to be
written by whiny, self-absorbed teenage girls (a recent Polish study actually
substantiated this), she argues that there’s also plenty of great writing to
be found.
“There are so many talented writers out there, it’s astonishing to me,” she
says. “These are people with no training, but they learn to do it well and
they have something to say — individuals who don’t have a media presence
anyplace else.”
Blogging is also a great way for people to expand
their social circles, Blood says. These days, bloggers
don’t just link up to each other virtually; they meet in the real world and
create instant, intimate communities.
But Blood has a good reason to believe in the fellowship of the blog: As it turns out, the first person who ever linked
to her site “back in the day” eventually became her husband.
This article is part of Digital
Journal's 2004 spring issue. Pick up your copy of Digital Journal
in bookstores across Canada. Or subscribe to Digital Journal
now, and receive 8 issues for $19.95 + GST ($39.95 USD).
|