I have read many articles over the years about why a Roller rolls. But, I do not recall ever reading one about the aerodynamics the Roller needs to master in order to roll. From a practical standpoint it strikes me that the aerodynamics is an important subject. After all, if we understand the aerodynamics a bit it might just tell us something about how to breed a better Roller.
Airplanes
were designed after birds in general. A
major key to making an airplane or making a
bird fly in a stable manner is to place the center of gravity and
center of
lift in proper places with respect to each other. In
both birds and planes the major lifting
surface is the wing.
A minor lifting
surface in both cases is the tail.
Either a airplane or a bird
can rotate on three axis.
These three axis are called
the pitch, roll
and yaw axis.
For purposes of
understanding a bird rolling only the pitch axis is important so I will
ignore
the other two.
If you draw a line from one wing tip to the other wing tip
rotation around this line is a pitch rotation.
This is the rotation a Roller
makes when it rolls.
Modest changes in the pitch
axis are made in
an airplane by adjustment to the angle of the tail control surfaces. In
a bird the whole tail is moved up or down
a bit.
In either a plane or a bird
simply
adjusting this control surface is able to cause the object to fly a
loop
providing it has enough air speed at the start.
But, it will not cause the
rapid spin we see in a Roller.
There are well understood design criteria for airplanes that
lead to stable flight.
If you violate
these designs you will have a plane that is either very hard or
impossible for
a human to fly.
These same design
criteria apply to birds.
An important
design criteria to worry about is where the center of gravity happens
to be
relative to the center of lift.
The
center of gravity of any object is simply that point from which you
could hang
the object on a string and it would not rotate nose down or nose up. The
center of lift is that point on a flying
object where you could treat all lift as simply being a vertical vector. In
order to have an airplane or a bird that
fly's in a stable manner, the center of gravity must be slightly
forward
of the
center of lift.
As you move the center
of gravity back towards the center of lift, the flying object becomes
less and
less stable in the pitch axis.
Very
small corrections with the tail control surface, leads to a very large
pitch
axis response.
If you move the center of
lift in front of the center of gravity, stable flight is impossible. The
flying object will roll in the pitch
axis.
In an airplane, a pilot who wishes to stay alive worries a
lot about where his center of gravity is relative to his center of lift. There
are some controls a pilot has, to move
the center of gravity forward or backwards.
He can adjust how the plane
is loaded and which fuel tanks are
used.
He can seat heavy passengers
close
to the wing.
A bird is stuck and does
not have the ability to move weight forwards or backwards.
A
crop full of food moves the birds center of
gravity forward and the bird can not shift other weight to compensate. However,
a bird can do something an airplane
can not do.
A bird can rotate its wings
forwards or backwards at the shoulder to adjust the center of lift,
relative to
the center of gravity.
This ability to
rotate at the shoulder is very important for a bird; if it could not
do this,
it would have a hard time flying. Birds
simply must be able to make such compensations to accommodate full
versus empty
crops.
A full crop would call for a
more forward wing angle than an empty crop.
A Homer burns a significant
amount of abdominal fat during a race moving
its center of gravity forwards, from where it was at the start of a
race.
So
during the race, the Homer needs to be able
to swing its wings slightly forward to keep the center of gravity and
center of
lift in the correct relationship. A
hen
can be carrying an unlaid egg one hour, then lay the egg the next hour
and need
to fly again even though the center of gravity has been shifted. The
hen needs to shift her wing angle
slightly forward to compensate for laying an egg. There
is nothing in the slightest unnatural
about this ability.
All birds have it.
When a Roller is going to do
the first flip it may tilt its
body very slightly up from level flight and flare its tail.
At
that point its tail is straight out behind
the bird. Picture 1 of a Roller right at initiation of the roll shows
this clearly.
Picture 1 also shows the wings rotated forwards from normal flying position. In normal flying position the leading edge of both wings is nearly a straight line rather than a V as shown in this picture. This picture and the rest of the pictures in this sequence were all of the same bird during 70% of one initial rotation.
Then the Roller starts a wing flap. During this wing flap it keeps both wings rotated forwards at the shoulder from the normal flight position. This moves the center of lift forward of the center of gravity. The net result is the bird is not in stable flight. Rather, the lift from that single wing flap starts a violent backwards rotation. Think about hanging a one foot long ruler from a string tied on the six inch position. The six inch position is the center of gravity. Now, if you tied a second string on the ruler at the five and one half inch position and jerked up sharply what would happen? Obviously the ruler would rotate violently about its center of gravity. That five and a half inch point is the equivalent of the center of lift. If you watch flying Rollers and know what to look for you can see this forward swing of the wings for that first wing beat at the start of a flip. If you watch slow motion of a Roller the wings swinging forwards is a lot easier to see. What you can not see without slow motion is what the tail is doing during establishment of the angular momentum needed for the flip. Picture 2 clearly shows the tail is still extended straight out behind the bird. Yet the bird is already starting to be in a head up attitude.
Picture
5 shows the bird just a little farther along in the
first flip of the roll.
The wings are
still fully extended over the back and the tail is now fully lifted to
reduce
drag.
At this point all the angular
momentum needed to roll is established.
However, drag forces during
the roll will wear away this angular
momentum.
So the bird will continue to
flap its wings about one time per flip as long as it wishes the roll to
continue.
It will also keep it tail
high
as long as it wishes to continue the roll.
To stop the roll the bird
simply extends its tail to normal flying
position and does one wing flap with the wings swung slightly behind
normal
flying position.
This will cancel the
stored angular momentum of the roll.
What
do these pictures tell us about what the best Roller should
look like?
One obvious thing is the
shorter the birds body is the less angular momentum it needs to
generate to
allow a given rotation speed.
So a short
backed bird should be able to roll faster than a long backed bird. Likewise
a smaller overall bird has less mass
thus requires less energy to establish the needed angular momentum. Flying
Rollers typically are small
pigeons.
I suspect breeders have done
a
good job of selecting for proper size pigeons simply by selecting for
good
performance.
All birds have the ability
to swing their wings forwards at the shoulder to put them in position
to
initiate a roll.
But not all birds are
willing to roll.
So the breeder is mainly
selecting for an attitude on the birds part that rolling is desirable. All
the breeder can select for is parents
that have this attitude based on their performance and hope the
attitude is
passed to offspring.
Some
may still feel the tail is important in establishing
the angular momentum regardless of what photography so clearly shows. Well,
we all know a bird can fly without a
tail.
In fact they can fly
remarkably
well.
So I took a young roller that
had
been flying a month.
This bird was doing
a lot of single flips and occasionally doing short rolls of three or
four
flips.
On day one I pulled the two
outer
tail feathers and released it to fly with the kit.
There
was zero change in its
performance.
It could still flip just as
good and just as often with only 10 tail feathers as it could with 12. Each
subsequent day I
pulled the two outer tail
feathers.
I saw no change in the speed
of this birds
flips as I pulled tail feathers. Nor
did
it perform less as it lost tail feathers.
On the day I pulled the last
two tail feathers the first couple of times
it performed it lost a lot of altitude.
Up until that point it would
generally gain altitude during a one or two
flip performance.
But after it had
adapted to zero tail feathers, which only took less than five minutes
flying
time, its performance was just as good as it had been six days before
with a
full tail.
It turned over just as fast
and it performed just as often and it no longer lost altitude.
On
one occasion I have seen one of my birds do a fair flip
without even doing a wing flap.
The
birds had been flying for some time and were getting tired. They
were doing a lot of gliding.
One of them, during a glide,
simply rotated
its wings well forward from normal glide position.
The
result was a single flip.
It was not a very fast flip. But
it was a well controlled flip.
It
seems clear from the photos that any pigeon that can fly
is capable of rolling.
All they need to
do is rotate the wing forward a bit at the shoulder and the roll is
automatic.
Thus the genetics we need to
put in the bird are not structural changes.
They are aimed at making the
bird enjoy rolling.
The bird needs to want to
roll or it is not
going to roll.
Entrikin’s
1972 Journal of Heredity paper indicates rolling
is a multi gene trait.
My observations
support this idea.
I started with Joe
Quinn stock.
These birds did not perform
at all unless they were flown every single day for months.
All
of these birds would do a single flip
occasionally if flown long enough. But
even two year old birds did not really roll.
The very best of them might
turn over three or four times rarely and
most only single flipped.
Also the
frequency of performance was very low.
Quite often I would watch a
kit of 20 birds and see no more than one
bird flip in ten minutes.
This
year I got some stock from a strain that has been bred
strictly for performance.
These birds
will start to do flips within a month of flying daily.
Some
are doing flips while still squeakers. They
progress much more rapidly than the
Quinn birds.
From the first tail rides
to the first flip is generally only two or three days.
They
do good tight flips and quite often by
two months of flying are doing triple and quadruple flips.
They
also perform at a higher air speed than
the Quinn birds.
The Quinn birds need to
really slow air speed down to perform.
The high performance birds
will perform at normal air speed and
routinely exit a single or double flip at higher altitude than they had
when
they entered the sequence.
Frequency of
performance is orders of magnitude higher than Quinn birds.
To
date crosses between the Quinn birds and high performance
birds have given performance no better than pure Quinn birds. They
have now been flying for two months and
are not even doing tail rides yet.
Quinn
states in his CD on Rollers that it took as much as
six generations of back crosses to pure Rollers to put the roll back in
his
birds after an outcross to a nonperforming breed. Lee
Faecking has told me this fits with his
experience also.
Rolling is
complex.
A lot depends on how often
the
birds are flown as well as how long they have flown.
Birds
flown daily perform more than birds
flown only two or three times a week.
The same bird will perform
more as a two year old than as a one year
old.
It has often been noted that
two
siblings can differ greatly in performance, even in inbred strains. It
is also a lot harder to judge rolling
performance than it is to look at a crest or some other show trait and
judge
the quality of the crest or the other show trait. I
suspect that some of the many back crosses
needed to recover the roll is simply that roll is hard to judge and
also due to
performance variation in individual birds that are quite alike
genetically.
Six generations of back
crosses would indicate roll is quite a lot of genes.
Probably
over half a dozen at least.
On the other hand when you
think about the
difficulty of judging rolling and the individual variation, my guess is
a half
dozen genes is more like the maximum number.
It seems clear that rolling
is a multi gene complex just like most
physical traits in pigeons.
The data
also indicates that some of these genes are codominants.
My
observation has been that Rollers are quite calm birds
relative to many breeds.
I have to
wonder if calmness is not an important part of good rolling performance? A
bird that felt stress during its first
attempts to roll, as a flighty bird might, would naturally resist
performing.
As I feel performance is
wholly voluntary and the bird must enjoy it calmness and a low tendency
to get
excited or stressed may be important.
Rollers also seem to have a low degree of homing ability. Attempts were documented to train a variety of breeds to home in the Hollander years of the Newsletter. Rollers were the poorest homing breed tested. Even with considerable training few would come home from 25 miles. Last year I flew some birds from May 1 until about October 1. I culled 20 of these birds in early October by cutting their bands off and releasing them 15 miles air distance from my house. Only one of these birds came home and it took that bird several days to return. It was a three year old bird. Homer guys tell me that they would expect 100% return if they did such a test with Homers. I think Rollers may have been selected for non homing ability. It is highly desirable for Rollers to fly close enough to the loft so they can be seen most of the time. I live in a pretty heavily wooded area. So I can only see my birds fly when they are close to the loft. If they go more than 1/8 mile horizontal distance from the loft they are going to be behind trees. I can see them about 75% of the time when they are flying. By contrast, when I flew Homers they were often out of sight for an hour or more. Selection for poor homing ability probably induces Rollers to fly much closer to the loft so they do not get lost.
~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.