WHO are a chief cause of organized-crime internet porn-website-advertisement listings apart from which typical surfers would not be aware of most porn URLs on the Web?
ARE major 'search engine" personnel significantly to blame for IMPOSING (NOT merely 'placing') a very real and devastating STUMBLING BLOCK into the way of the cyberpublic - contrary to Ephesians 5:3 paraphrased as:
If YOU are a NORMAL exploratory Christian person who has spent significant time on The World Wide Web, you might (perhaps nonadmittedly) empathize in silent agreement with the questions at hand.
Are we not 'red-blooded' children of the 'red-blooded' mothers and fathers preceding us who patiently posed nude for and meticulously painted and sculptured available and compliant mostly-bare or completely-naked young women of decades and centuries past......along with former-generation pervert purists who relished gazing at aforementioned putrid pulchritude plus pay massive money for and vehemently protect such priceless porn art with armed security in galleries and museums?
If you cannot claim responsibility in any way for the above, perhaps you can identify yourself as a 'girl-watcher' - especially during warm summer days at mixed-gender public beaches? Or perhaps have, on a rare occasion, peeked into a strip bar downtown to peruse the parameters? There are a thousand applications relating to this, of course, and there is no sense legalistically nitpicking on what one has and has not done for self-justification and self-defensiveness.
We are not talking about grossly perverse displays of homosexual depictions, peeing, bestiality, bondage with torture, transgenderism, non-mature/non-genitally-appreciative toddlers in adult-contrived and coerced porn or other such obnoxious aberrations...but instead general-and-typical show-all-to-the-general-public exhibition of (particularly young-women's) mopheaded loose long hair, naked arms, bellies, backs, legs, sockless feet in sandals, and similar - closely akin to the more extreme 'art-forms' in the galleries of museums.
You will notice that I am talking quite frankly about all this. I grew up - as you also probably did - in a mixed-up disregard-the-Bible society of contradictory and hypocritical public prudes who simultaneously were private perverts (especially those who ridiculed and advocated postponement of marriage, and hence, NIV's misrendition of their warped version of I Corinthians 7:1). Much was imposed on my Christian grandparents, Christian parents, Christian friends and neighbors, and on me -- victims of NON-ASKED-FOR improperly-dressed sexual harassment and outside duress from worldly wicked who (in effect) forced the pure into POINTLESS debasement in so many ways so relentlessly to more than merely talk anti-matrimonially and anti-sexually as if marital romance and erotica were a sick and mentally-deficient disease.
Into such a sin-infested environment, us websurfers nowadays encounter another incentive to licentuous lasciviousness: suggestive search-engine listings.
Key words (such as teen, nude, thumbs, thumbnails, tgp, virgins, girls, lolitas, nudist, naturist, and much more more - with or without various combinations of such) typed into search boxes promptly open a virtual Pandora's Box of pictoral vice....making the paper porn magazines and dirty-pic tabloids of the playboy and penthouse era antiquated, irrelevant, and nearly obsolete.
Practically useless it is for the buzzphrase: 'DO NOT ENTER THIS WEBSITE IF YOU OBJECT TO NUDITY' to suggestively warn the curious and able (of any age or religious backround) to surf into whatever webporn there is with non-restricted ease...and no need to embarrassingly FIRST present personal identification of name, address, SS#, and age. Obviously, inane and worthless disclaimers are in NO way adequate to thwart the puberty-awakened who are interested in investigating what enticing porn-lewdity should not be investigated and which (by investigation alone) cannot be altered nor eradicated.
Although the top of the homepage of a pornsite may not contain nude images, scrolling down or linking to hotlinks therein more often than not leads the surfer right to the heart of satanic naked exposure and consequential self-sodomizing masturbation, inclination thereto, or at least pubic-area moistening.
If fact, when one thinks about it, isn't it rather illogical for porn website purveyors to warn against the content of their own website? WHY are THEY even suggesting that something is wrong with THEIR OWN site - if it is not in fact wrong?
No brownie points with God are accumulated by the impenitently perverse reminding the Lord or anyone else how much of a rat they are in pseudo-knowledgeably detailing to the Omniscient and his saints how BAD it is.
So, porn website warnings are NOT adequate to hinder the voyeuristically and insatiably curious. MOST blasphemously-called 'weak'-minded males craving sexual-stimuli sightings have no qualms clicking to enter pornsites thus lying about whether or not they agree it's OK to see nude pix or present public porn as a principle.
Getting back to search-engine keywords typed into search-engine search boxes, many of such are comprised of tricky lawyerlike satanspeak - similar to the semantical weaselword sloptalk spewed out of the Serpent to naked Eve in the Garden: 'Did God say that you may not eat of ANY tree in the Garden'- to which nude Eve might instead have replied: 'No. Where did you get THAT idea, idiot? You trying to revise history? Trying to misrepresent the Word of the Lord, fartmouth? God did NOT say the word 'ANY,' ditzhead'......and left it at that for a trembling chigrined Devil to sweat out the remainder of his devious deceptive dissertation to the bare babe.
The previous paragraph gives the reason that dependence upon even 'christian'-oriented filters is futile. Filters may block out certain sexually-related words, but can never eliminate all. Sexual words can be re-spelled or synonymously alluded to indirectly with seemingly-benign apparently-nonsexual vocabulary. 'Sex' can be spelled 'cex,' for example.
Software which edits out picture files (such as .jpg, .gif, .bmp, .tif and similar ones) invaribly and indiscriminately censors ALL pictures of skin-colored objects unless it selectively is designed to merely edit out ONLY private-part segments of photos and paintings, or whatever.
Who ARE the 'brilliant' behind-the-scenes technonerds with their weird-named 'search engines' - conspiring to naiively or deliberately aid and abet a vast globally-accessible worldwide mafia-like web of interstate-transported porno obscenity...a huge porn syndicate out to greedily titillate whoever they can for monetary profit? Let us not be so absurd as to presume that the filters touted by such will in reality be effective in supposedly protecting us with "safe"-search.
The-bottom-line-is-materialism search-engine personnel [sucking in everything possible with sewer-gutterhole, polluted-slimepit, rancid-cesspool NON-DISCRIMINATION, worldly search-engine controllers (with depraved and defiled minds) - like the corrupt secular TV and radio media, assiduously linked to pornsites of all kinds] are in NO position to discern what is and what is not "porngraphy" (much less capable of Biblically preventing new and worsening porno-html intrusion from whoever and wherever).
Mistrust against such TV-programming and search-engine operators is entirely justified. WHY would secular search engine editors link with ANY non-filtered porn sites AT ALL in the FIRST place if they WERE reliable anti-smut nannies and anti-obscenity guardians?
This is not about 'making friends by means of unrighteous mammon' but instead not being ACCURSEDLY-PRESUMPTUOUS FOOLS IN-discriminately wallowing around inside vomit-saturated toilets of lurid cyberlicentuousness. Demonic federal statutues with ACLU, AUSCS, PAW and other herodian-like creeps and jerks chastise holy innocents for violating nondiscriminating laws; while the LORD and His Bible - in 180 degree OPPOSITE contrast - order us to 'Do not be mismated with disbelievers. Come out from among them, be separate, and touch nothing unclean, and then I will welcome you' (II Corinthians 6:14-17). 'Bad company ruins good morals' (I Corinthians 15:33). 'Avoid such people' (Romans 16:17 and II Timothy 3:5). 'Do not associate with them' (Ephesians 5:7). If the ACLU and fed legalists NON-HYPOCRITICALLY want to stick THEIR OWN noses into porn shit, let them do it, but do not ALLOW them to force the noses of the SAINTS into it. We saints can simply smell the stink from a safe distance, thank you.
Some fundamentalists may even think it worthwhile to censor from eyesight more than they need to for the sake of depriving their eyes of sudden and nonexpected terroristic porno-assault and abuse by accidently clicking on porn option 'provided' by secular search-engine geeks. Such purists have a point in realizing that they cannot know everything anyway that is going on everywhere.
How fortunate are those who are not snookered into to learning 'the deep things of Satan' (Revelation 2:24), so as to not get helplessly entangled in some increasingly-frustrating burden of clicking from one non-copyable .htm pornpage code-linked to another ad infinitum, or boggled down in some endless javascript-perpetuating porn-loop wormhole one can only escape from by shutting the entire computer down or rebooting it.
For those surfing with home (not library or company) computers into which the C-drive (i.e. main hard drive) can be directly accessed, it is possible to manipulate and temporarily reset the Internet Explorer, Netscape, or whatever browser to reject ALL picture files...and I mean ALL pix. (Nothing like throwing the baby out with the bathwater)!
So if we surfers have a gut feeling that the keywords we WOULD type into search boxes are in any way questionable or could be taken in a dangerous sense, we have responsibility to not type them in AT ALL, (holy ignorance is NOT the end of the world!) rather than type them in presuming to be able to back out but then vainly trying to extricate ourselves from the virtually inescapable spider's trap we have stuck OURSELVES to.
If trapped by being escorted into cyberporn [compliments of MSN, Google, Yahoo, Lycos, Alta Vista, Dogpile, Excite, Metacrawler, Ask Jeeves, etc.] it is too late...we've gone too far....it is too tempting and alluring at that point to back out from what seems to be a temporary, secretly-covert, no-immediate-punishment-nor-harm, excursion into sensuously-exciting opportunity.
Three things must be done to minimize nefarious search-engine-linked damage against purity and decency:
1. Declaring pertinent, modesty-related, sexually-oriented, Scripture-verse quotations [out of BOTH the Old and New Testaments], inform men (and especially women) on what decency of attire is and the divine requirement for it,
2. Avoid looking at full-sized, live-person, porn-in-motion, misdressed gals during warm summer days. Again, righteous and holy DISCRIMINATION is ordered by the Lord - despite the satanic call for senseless and devastating self-destructive and SO-CALLED 'legal' nondiscrimination. Avoid going certain places at certain times where the immodest are likely to be. To hide discreetly is NOT cowardice, but rather WISDOM! (Isaiah 16:3, 26:20). Only an DAMNED FOOL runs out in front of machine-gun bullets, finding out too late that he simply can NOT "take it like a man" or "it doesn't bother me," and
3. Date, become engaged to, marry, and have sex with the most facially-attractive (Song 2:14), shapely and fair-to-look-upon (Genesis 6:2, 24:16, 26:7, Esther 1:11 and Job 42:15), blemish-free (Leviticus 21:17-21, Daniel 1:4, and Ephesians 5:27) and young-adult (Leviticus 27:2-4) spouse one can get...who is as gymnastically capable as possible and eagerly willing to perform every type of sexual activity humanly imaginable, mutually-enjoyable, and possible (including pose and dance) which does not cause nonnatural bruises or bleeding (Ecclesiastes 11:10), prolonged nonwashed seminal contact (Leviticus 15) nor mouth-contact with urine or feces (Ezekiel 4:12-15) as described in Genesis 2:25, II Samuel 6:16, Isaiah 47:2, Ezekiel 16:37 and Hosea 2:3 not excluding fellatio-fulfiling combinations of Deuteronomy 25:11, Song 5:1, and KJV's/NKJV's Jeremiah 2:25 with various other varieties of imaginative coital copulation connected with Song 1-8 and I Corinthians 7:5.
A key verse to remember is:
'Therefore I would that the younger women marry, bear children, manage the house, and give the enemy no cause to revile us.' (I Timothy 5:14 - KJV and Wesley NT ONLY)
[Keep in mind that the exact Greek word for women - which is NE(O)TERAS and pronounced "neh-OH-ter-ass" AND its precise English-word meaning - which is WOMEN and NOT "widows" - takes precedence over any presumed context deviate heretics purport it to be]
Such plus other outside intervention and force is needed to prevent the diehard investigator from wandering, eagerly stumbling into, and secretly indulging in sexual-lust wickedness.
By doing this, we will avoid encountering and confronting MUCH low-powered porn (e.g. female-human mopheadedness, sleevelessness, bareleggedness, and barefootedness)....and especially avoid HIGHER-powered public-nuisance lewd-conduct exhibitionism such as that described graphically-enough in KJV's Proverbs 5:19, Isaiah 3:17, 20:4, plus Ezekiel chapters 16 and 23.
Only after Christ Jesus returns at Armageddon can saints reliably expect the elect in charge to replace presently-pervasive pornsites with ONLY NON-porn webpages proudly and non-ashamedly showing rows and columns of links and pics of true-color, sharp-resolution, click-to-enlarge thumbnails photos of pretty, young-adult, DATABLE Christian women in all sorts of front, back, and side poses -- ALL COMPLETELY and CONSISTENTLY fully dressed in PERFECTLY-MODEST attire...decked with chignons, LONG sleeves, LONG NON-slitted skirt or ROOMY NON-tight slacks, shoes with SOCKS or BOOTS...as prospective BRIDES for prospective HUSBANDS to click and groove with.
We will be pleasantly surprised how much progress the Lord can and will help us make not leading us into temptation (which Lord's-Prayer-related temptation He does not want to lead us into anyway). We will - with perserverance - learn to be 'wise as serpents yet innocent as doves' (Matthew 10:16)....minus the near-blasphemous giving of such credit to snakes -- in the noncompromising grace and forgiveness of God through our Atonement Jesus Christ, resulting in fewer and fewer failures as we progress in well-rehearsed wariness and alert maturity.