Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

RURAL SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR IN INDIA

 

Background

 

The spread of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in India, driven primarily by sexual contact, has impelled research into sexuality and sexual behavior in various sectors of the Indian population. The decade of the nineties saw numerous studies of sexual behavior in a variety of locations, mostly characterized by a strong focus on qualitative methodology, exploring in-depth the complex patterns and contexts of sexual behavior. However, there has been more research in urban areas, with insufficient attention to rural situations and tribal sexual behavior.

 

The various aspects of HIV/AIDS have been studied primarily against the backdrop of risky behavior, with studies focused on truckers, commercial sex workers (CSWs), the gay-lesbian community, intravenous drug users (IDUs) and students, among others. Recent evidence shows that the HIV/AIDS epidemic in India has now moved into the general population. Current estimates indicate that there are about four million Indians living with the virus (making it the country with the largest estimated number of HIV positive people in the world), with the epidemic growing rapidly. The spread of HIV infections in the general population means that research about sexual contacts and behaviors cannot be focused only on so-called “high-risk” groups. Rather, the sexual relations and patterns in all sectors of the Indian population¾including the full range of socially, culturally, and demographically diverse groups¾must be studied, a need that cannot be sufficiently emphasized.

 

Study Objectives

 

The present study was undertaken to understand sexual behavior patterns among the rural population, and also to describe various causative and contextual factors for varying patterns of sexual behavior among different age-groups of rural women and men.

 

It investigated a broad range of behaviors associated with romantic, emotional and erotic interests involving individuals and their relations with other persons, both same sex and opposite sex. The study understands sexuality to mean the full range of sexual behaviors as they are manifested in the life of an individual, within the context of family, village life, social relationships and health.

 

From the broad range of issues it addresses, the study attempts to answer the following questions:

·        What is the pattern of different sexual behaviors among the sample population? For example, what is the pattern of pre-marital and extra-marital relations, homosexual behavior, sexual relations within the family (incest), sexual relations across different age groups and/or any other form of sexual behavior?

·        How is sexuality and sexual behavior expressed in rural areas? What are the associated connotations and language? What, if any, are the gender issues involved in sexual behavior?

·        What are the cultural (i.e., beliefs, attitudes, power structures and other related norms) and contextual factors (i.e., available sex, loneliness, influence of media, economic situation, force, and/or group behavior, among others) that give rise to these behaviors and sustain them?

·        How vulnerable are adolescent girls, boys, and men and women to sexually transmitting infections by way of their exposure to sexual behavior and experience of sexual violence?

·        What is the extent of HIV/AIDS awareness among the study population?

·        What is the relationship between sexual attitudes and myths about sexuality and sexual health and sexual behavior?

 

Study Methodology

 

Sampling design: The study was carried out in two phases. Focused ethnographic work was carried out in the first phase, followed by a representative household survey of 2,910 men between 18 and 40 years, thus combining both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

 

Both phases of data gathering were undertaken in five Indian states¾Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa and Karnataka¾covering one district in each state. The qualitative phase of the study was conducted in 10 rural sites of the selected states, with 165 men and 85 women included in the study, while the quantitative phase covered 50 villages where only men were interviewed.

 

The states were selected randomly, as being representative of the eastern, western, northern, southern and central regions of India and were chosen from the list of states that had more than 80 percent rural population.

 

Districts¾Mahendragarh district, Haryana; Jalore district, Rajasthan; Jaunpur district, Uttar Pradesh; Puri district, Orissa; and Tumkur district, Karnataka¾were also chosen randomly, but only from a list that fulfilled the following criteria, having:

·        More than 80 percent rural population (1991 Census); and

·        Less than 5 percent tribal population.

 

Method: The focused ethnographic study comprised two stages¾

·        Interviews for special case studies with a total of 197 persons (133 males and 64 females) belonging to diverse socio-economic backgrounds and sexually active at the time of survey; and

·        Interviews with 53 key informants, comprising 32 men and 21 women, individuals who were specially outgoing and willing to talk and seemed to possess a special body of information about cultural and environmental factors related to the village and all the domains and sub-domains presented in the conceptual framework.

 

This study was conducted in two sites in each of the selected districts, making a total of ten villages. The selected sites fulfilled three specific criteria:

·        Villages that had less than 5 per cent tribal population;

·        Villages that had a population size of more than 500, and

·        Villages that were at least 5 kms away from the nearest town or any urban center.

 

Quantitative and qualitative surveys: The expected sample in the quantitative survey for each was around 600 men. However, due to non-response/non-availability of some of the selected households, the actual sample size covered ranges between 570 men in Haryana and Karnataka, 590 men in Orissa, 579 men in Uttar Pradesh, and 601 men in Rajasthan. As illustrated by their background characteristics, the selected men represented a variety of ethnic, socio-economic and demographic characteristics thought to be typical of rural India.

 

The first step in the qualitative data collection phase involved researchers meeting both formal and informal gatekeepers in the villages. They introduced the organizations (IIPS, Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and UNFPA) conducting the research and its purpose, which was articulated in terms of the broad health needs of both men and women. Gatekeepers were informed about the sensitive nature of data and assured of complete confidentiality. Researchers were oriented to deal with questions, concerns, and clarifications, discuss benefits and also discuss the main issues in the village, which involved:

·        Making contact and establishing a rapport with individuals in the community.

·        Getting information about the general layout of the community, locations of health providers and other facilities, and other useful general data concerning social groups, divisions, special features, and other information.

·        Identifying individuals (in the group) who were later approached as key informants.

·        Observing public settings such as “lovers’ lanes”, youth “hangouts”, bars and similar places as well as settings such as community centers, women’s gatherings, markets and ceremonies.

 

The qualitative data was collected through free-lists, pile sorts and in-depth interviews seeking histories and current sexual activities. Sexuality and sexual behavior was considered from the perspective of associations with romantic, emotional and erotic interests as well as sexually intimate behavior of individuals and their relations with other persons, both same sex and opposite sex. Sexuality was taken to mean the full range of sexual behaviors as they are manifested in the life of the individual within the context of family, village life, social relationships and health.

 

A brief overview of the selected sites: The five rural districts selected for the study, while they share many common features, including low to very low female literacy, and the easy availability of pornographic material and films, represent the varying landscape of rural India.

 

Jaunpur district in eastern Uttar Pradesh, is well known for its high emigration, with a significant proportion of its male population working in Mumbai. The survey found some villages with virtually no adult men; all are reportedly employed in Mumbai, while women and family elders manage the households and the fields. With a rural population of about 3.6 million, rural Jaunpur has a female literacy rate of about 17 percent. Early marriage is widely prevalent as also a system called ‘gauna’, whereby the consummation of marriage takes place after a gap of about 3-5 years.

 

Puri district in Orissa is famous for the ancient Hindu temple of Jagannath and thus attracts a large number of tourists through the year. The rural population of about 1.2 million is particularly adversely affected due to the periodic devastating cyclones. Rural female literacy is about 29 percent. 

 

Jalore district, located in western Rajasthan, has a scattered rural population of about 1.3 million. Famed for its several ancient monuments, it also has a rich heritage in artisanship, including diamond cutting. A large number of skilled diamond cutters from the district migrate seasonally to work either in Mumbai or northern Karnataka, taking the men away from home for a substantial part of the year, leaving the household and fields in the hands of women and elders. While rural female literacy is only about 10 percent, in-depth interviews revealed that certain rural communities here practice commercial sex in a non-commercial context, i.e., in households where hospitality includes offering guests sexual favors. Yet another common practice is marriage on an ‘exchange’ basis (locally termed as ‘atta-satta’) whereby a brother-sister pair cross-marry another brother and sister pair. This puts several young men who do not have sisters at a disadvantage and affects their eligibility for marriage.

 

Mahendragarh district in Haryana has a rural population of about 0.7 million, with female literacy at about 22 percent. Relatively advanced economically, Haryana is also known for very high female feticide rates and an adverse sex ratio unfavorable to females.

 

Tumkur district in Karnataka, close to the state capital Bangalore and relatively developed, has an approximate 2 million rural population with about 23 percent female literacy. The principal industries in the district are manufacture of coarse cotton cloths, woolen blankets and ropes. Tumkur also has a large number of private colleges with students from all over the state and other parts of India. The practice of Kudike (where a widow remarries but does not get the rights or ‘position’ of wife) is prevalent.

 

The study found that in all the rural sites, except those in Rajasthan, pornographic movies and literature were popular. In remote areas of eastern Uttar Pradesh (UP) and in Karnataka, sexually explicit posters of pornographic films are commonly displayed. The researchers’ observations were that the audience for porn films is made up mainly of young college boys and middle-aged persons.

 

Study Findings

 

Socio-demographic profile

 

State-wise coverage of the number of respondents, giving some important characteristics, are highlighted below (Table 1).


 

 

Table 1: Select Characteristics of Respondents by State

 

Selected Characteristics of respondents

State*

Haryana

Karnataka

Orissa

Rajasthan

Uttar Pradesh

Total

Number of respondents

  570  

570

590

601

579

2910

Ever attended school

526 (92.3)

463 (81.2)

535 (90.7)

309 (51.4)

451 (77.9)

2284 (78.5)

Currently unmarried

79 (13.9)

154 (27.0)

173 (29.3)

130 (21.6)

23 (4.0)

559 (19.2)

Age below 25 years

Mean age (year)

238 (41.8)

     26.7

126 (22.1)

     30.1

162 (27.5)

     29.3

181 (30.1)

     28.6

135 (23.3)

     28.5

842 (28.9)

       28.6

Currently employed

485 (85.1)

505 (88.6)

501 (84.9)

570 (94.8)

386 (66.7)

2447 (84.1)

Hindu

564 (98.9)

519 (91.9)

586 (99.3)

554 (92.2)

530 (91.5)

2753 (94.6)

Scheduled caste

Scheduled tribe

OB caste

General

  112

    3

  294

  151

 123

  20

 201

 187

  178

    2

  252

  150

  195

   39

  246

  116

  171

    2

  358

   46

779 (26.8)

    66 (2.3)  

1351 (46.4)

650 (22.3)

 

The average age of the respondents was 29 years (from 27 years in Haryana to 30 years in Karnataka). In terms of educational level, most of the respondents (78.5 percent) had attended school, except in Rajasthan, where about an equal number had attended as had not attended school. The marital status of respondents varied widely among the five states under study. It may be appropriate to mention here that early marriage continues to be the norm in northern India.

 

Sexual behavior (including pre- and extra-marital sexual behavior)

 

Overall, 90 percent of all the men interviewed (aged 18-40 years) reported having experienced sexual intercourse (Figure 1). Exposure to sexual intercourse, on an average, seems to be very closely associated with age at marriage. This becomes clearer from the data on the incidence of pre-marital sex. On an all-India level, eight percent of the men had experienced sexual intercourse prior to the age of 15. The proportion varied state-wise, from a low of 1.6 percent in Karnataka, a state with a relatively higher age at marriage, to 16.4 percent in Uttar Pradesh, a state where early marriage is relatively more common.

 


Figure 1: Select indicators of sexual behavior: All-India and Sample States

 

 

 

Overall, a little over one-fourth of the married men reported having had sexual intercourse before marriage. About one-third of the men reported having had sex between the wedding and the actual consummation of marriage, indicative of higher sexual activity between marriage and consummation of marriage especially in UP and Haryana, where the custom of ‘gauna’[1] exists. These findings are significant as generally it is believed that marital sexual activity starts only after gauna heralding consummation of marriage. In Uttar Pradesh, the proportion having had pre-marital sex moves up from 25.7 percent for those who experienced it before marriage to 47.3 percent for those who had a sexual experience after the wedding but before consummation. In Karnataka and Orissa, where the system of ‘gauna’ is non-existent, there is no difference between the two measures of pre-marital sex for currently married men.

 

Two indices of sexual intercourse were measured for unmarried men¾one, ‘ever’ having had a sexual experience and, two, sex ‘during the past 12 months’. Overall, about 43 percent of the unmarried men in the study population reported having ever experienced sexual intercourse. Overall, across the five states, one-third reported being actively involved in sexual activities over the immediately preceding 12 months, the highest (48 percent) in Orissa and the lowest (16 percent) in Karnataka (Figure 2).

 


Figure 2: Percentage of unmarried rural men reported to have had sexual intercourse, ‘ever’ as well as in the past twelve months: All-India and in the States

 

 

 

The study found one-fifth of all the currently married men in the sample as having ever had sexual intercourse with persons other than their spouses. A total of 15 percent of the currently married men reported having had extra-marital sex in the immediately preceding 12 months (Figure 3). The percentage however varied from a low of 6.3 in Uttar Pradesh to 37.4 in Orissa.

 


Figure 3: Percentage of currently married rural men reporting to have ever had extra-marital sexual intercourse, as well as in the past twelve months: All-India and Sample States

 

 

 

 

 

A much larger proportion of currently married men in Orissa, as compared to men from other states, reported having experienced extra-marital sex, both ‘ever’ (over 38 percent) as well as in the past 12 months (a little over 37 percent). This relatively high prevalence of extra-marital sex in Orissa is consistent with the findings on pre-marital sex. Although Puri may not truly represent the rural scenario of all of Orissa, the high prevalence of both pre-marital and extra-marital sex suggests the need to have focused educational programs in Puri district. What is surprising, however, is that in UP, where a very high proportion of married men reported pre-marital sex, only a small minority reported current extra-marital sexual encounters. Given the fact that a very high proportion of men in this part of UP work in distant places like Mumbai, which keeps them away from home for longer duration, one would expect a higher prevalence of extra-marital sex. Under-reporting of current extra-marital sex by the married men in the UP sample cannot be ruled out. However, an alternative explanation could be that most men in the sample were those living with their families, unlike seasonal or other migrants, and hence had less opportunity for extra-marital sex.


 

Sexual partners

 

Data on different types of sexual partners in the past 12 months for both married and unmarried respondents revealed some interesting trends (Figure 4). The study defined sexual partners, besides spouses for married men, in terms of four broad categories and left it to the respondents to define their partners in one of the given categories¾

·        Regular non-commercial;

·        Casual;

·        Commercial female sex worker; and

·        Men.

 

Besides spouse, the most usual extra-marital sexual experience for married men in rural areas with a “casual” female partner followed by “regular non-commercial,” and for unmarried men is it is “regular non-commercial” followed by other “male” partner.

 

Figure 4: Current Non-Spouse Sexual Partners for Married and Unmarried Men:

All Sample States

 

 

Men defined ‘casual’ sexual partners as people with whom they had no emotional relationship. Usually, these involved one-time encounters. A casual sexual partner could be a known person within the family, a friend or, as happened very often, a stranger or relatively unknown person. Among known persons, a casual sexual partner was usually a woman who the respondent had met at a religious or family function and coerced into having sex. Young men were found to look for ‘prey’ on these occasions and consciously plan a strategy to have casual sex. Unmarried men described a number of occasions when they forced a partner (generally a woman) into sex, who they happened to meet at religious or family functions or while travelling. Very often, however, the men portrayed the woman as having seduced him and initiated the sexual activity.

 

It is interesting to note that most of the men described these one-time casual sexual encounters as non-risky (“isme khatra nahi”) and non-commercial. In some cases, casual sex with an unknown woman was also seen as non-risky because the woman performed oral sex followed by vaginal sex and charged no money. There was no way to ascertain whether the sexual partner in these such encounters was a commercial sex-worker or not.

 

The description of regular non-commercial sexual partners, on the other hand, always involved a known person with whom the sexual encounter happened more than once. The partners included a friend’s wife or sister, a wife’s sister, or a sister-in-law within the family. Men described these relationships as primarily ‘emotional’, which initially happened ‘spontaneously’ (“achanak ho gaya”) and was then sustained. These regular non-commercial sexual relationships were described as quite ‘confidential’ and in the opinions of respondents “nobody knew about it”. In fact, in most cases married men described a very close relationship between the ‘other woman’ and the wife. None of the men saw any risk in having unprotected (without condom) sex with the regular non-commercial partner.

 

It may be noted that for both married men as well as unmarried men, sex with sex workers is not as common as it is with other male partners. Close to 10 percent of unmarried men and 3 percent of married men reported having had sexual intercourse with other men in the past 12 months. The unmarried men described sexual acts, which included mutual male-to-male masturbation and anal sex.

 

State-wise distribution of extra-marital sexual partners in the past 12 months for the currently married men revealed a wide variation (Table 2). A larger proportion of men in Orissa reported to have had extra-marital sex with ‘casual partners’, ‘regular non-commercial partners’, and ‘men’ as compared to the men from other states. Reporting of sex workers as sexual partner was uniformly low in all the states.

 

Table 2: State-wise distribution of currently married men reporting different types of extra-marital sexual partners in the past 12 months (percentages)

 

Sexual partners

States

All States

(2351)

Haryana

(491)

Karnataka

(416)

Orissa

(417)

Rajasthan

(471)

UP

(556)

Regular non-commercial

 

Casual

 

Sex worker

 

Male

3.7

 

10.2

 

4.1

 

2.6

3.6

 

4.1

 

1.0

 

---

16.3

 

21.9

 

3.4

 

9.3

4.7

 

3.6

 

2.0

 

2.8

1.4

 

2.7

 

1.7

 

1.3

5.6

 

8.1

 

2.3

 

3.1

 

Five percent of all the men interviewed reported to have had sexual intercourse with more than one type of partner in the past one year, ranging from one percent in UP to 14 percent in Orissa, which also reported a high level of non-marital sex among all men. Orissa, thus, not only has a higher proportion of men engaged in pre-marital and extra-marital sex, but also engagement with multiple partners (Figure 5). The most usual extra-marital sexual experience for married men in rural areas was found to be with a “casual” female partner followed by “regular non-commercial” partner. For unmarried men it was found that a “regular non-commercial” partner was most common, followed by the option of a “male” partner.

 

Figure 5: Engagement with Multiple Partners: Sample States

 

 

Condom use

 

The study found that the high risk inherent in such behavior was compounded by the low use of condoms in all the states (Figures 6 and 7).


Figure 7: Percentage of Married Men Using Condoms in Current Sexual Encounters: All-India and in Sample States

 

 

Overall, however, condom use was found to be much higher among unmarried respondents than the married men. Close to one-fourth of the unmarried men compared to only one in ten among married men reportedly used condoms with regular non-commercial sexual partners. One in every five and one in every three unmarried man used condoms if they had sex with casual and non-commercial partners and sex workers respectively. No condom use was reported in male-to-male sex (Table 3).

 

Table 3: Condom Use in Current Sexual Encounters by Type of Partner: All-India

 

Type of partner:

Unmarried

(N=559)

Currently married (N=2351)

Total

(N=2910)

Percentage:

N:

Percentage:

N:

Percentage:

N:

Spouse

- (-)

--

9.7 (226)

2326

9.7 (226)

2326

Regular Non-Commercial

23.0 (20)

87

11.5 (15)

131

16.1 (35)

218

Casual

20.5 (15)

73

5.3 (10)

190

9.5 (25)

263

Commercial Sex Worker

30.8 (8)

26

38.2 (21)

55

35.8 (29)

81

Male Partner

0 (0)

53

0 (0)

72

0 (-)

125

 

Data depicted in the table reflects the fact that both married and unmarried men reported very low levels of condoms use in both casual and commercial sex.

 

It must be remembered however, that state-wise data on condom use with different sexual partners presented in this study needs to be interpreted cautiously due to the very small numbers of men reporting these behaviors. As a possible trend however, the given data suggests that condom usage is relatively higher with sex workers in all the states under study, than with ‘regular non-commercial’ or ‘casual sexual partners’. The low usage of condoms with casual partners presents potential HIV/AIDS risk and is a matter of extreme concern.

 

STI/HIV/AIDS awareness

 

All the men in the sample were asked whether, in the past year, they had suffered from any of a given list of seven symptoms of sexual dysfunction. These included early ejaculation, lack of penile erection, thinning of semen, wet dreams, involuntary loss of semen, loss of sexual desire and ‘kamjori’. Little over half of them (55.1 percent) reported to have suffered from at least one of these sexual health concerns (Figure 8).

 

 

In view of the established relationship between sexual health anxieties, risky sexual behavior and STIs, it is important to take note of these anxieties in HIV/AIDS prevention programs.

 

The predominance of male sexual health concerns have been pointed out by quite a few recent studies of India. For example, a study in Mumbai showed a prevalence of 45 percent non-contact problems among men (Verma et al 1999). The most frequently mentioned sexual health concerns in Orissa were semen secretion or “thinning of semen”, severe itching in the genital area, nocturnal emission, AIDS and gonorrhoea (AIMS Research, 1997; Collumbien et al 1999). Similarly in Mumbai, men reported semen loss concerns in various forms (Verma et al 1999). All these studies suggest that STI symptoms and AIDS do not appear as the most prominent sexual health concerns for Indian men. These findings have important lessons for the public health system, which intends to address the issue of STI and HIV/AIDS prevention. The presence of non-contact problems has been shown to be closely linked with STIs, risk behavior antecedents (Verma and Schensul, 2002).

 

Only 71 percent of the respondents in this sample study had heard of a disease that can be transmitted through sexual intercourse, with a low of only 41 in Rajasthan (Figure 9).

 

Figure 9: Sexually Transmitted Infections: Awareness Levels

 

 

The men in the sample listed five possible types of STIs¾genital discharge, burning sensation/pain on urination, genital ulcers/sores, anal ulcers/sores, and swelling in the groin. Over 27 percent reported to have ever had experienced genital discharge, while 11 percent reported having experienced this in the past 12 months. The numbers were highest among men from Orissa. A majority (66 percent) thought the discharge was actually semen and not pus, again indicating semen loss anxiety and a further possible indication of risky sexual behavior. What was also of interest was that despite defining the discharge as semen, less than 17 percent of the men were found to have sought any treatment, most (11.5 percent) from private unqualified practitioners. About eight percent were trying out home remedies.

 

Five percent of all men reported having experienced genital ulcers and sores¾which are more clear indicators of STIs¾during the past 12 months. A high proportion of these men did not seek treatment. Only seven percent reported having sought treatment from government doctors or dispensaries. The presence of STIs is closely associated with HIV infection and many of these men might be themselves HIV positive and also may perhaps transmit the virus to their partners.

 

About 87 percent overall reported having heard about HIV/AIDS, from a low of 70 percent in Rajasthan to a high of 97 percent in UP. One in ten thought that HIV/AIDS is curable.

 

Only about 47 percent of the men said that the condom is an effective means of preventing HIV/AIDS/STIs. The reporting from UP in particular indicates that people may have heard of HIV/AIDS but this does not necessarily mean that they know also about the crucial aspects of its prevention. A large proportion of men are unlikely to use condoms during risky sexual intercourse, as they seem to either believe that the condom would not be a helpful protection against HIV or they are ignorant about this.

 

Table 4: Overall awareness levels about aspects of HIV/AIDS among

 rural men by state

 

 

States (all figures in percentage)

Haryana

Karnataka

Orissa

Rajasthan

Uttar Pradesh

Total

Ever heard about HIV/AIDS

90.7

90.0

87.3

70.2

96.9

86.9

HIV/AIDS is curable

8.6

9.6

11.9

5.5

10.0

9.1

Condom prevents HIV/AIDS

59.8

67.5

31.2

41.3

33.9

46.5

Knows someone affected by it

6.0

34.6

20.5

22.0

16.4

19.9

Knows someone died of AIDS

4.9

38.4

16.8

17.0

32.1

21.8

 

While about 20 percent of the men reported knowing someone who is affected by HIV/AIDS in their area, it is not clear how they learnt about the HIV status of other individuals. This ‘knowledge’ may have serious negative implications in terms of stigma and discrimination.

 

A large number of men were found to consider female sex workers as potential carriers of HIV/AIDS (50 percent). It is interesting to note that male sex workers were not seen to be as risky as female sex workers. In fact male sexual partners were seen as risky transmitters only by about one-fifth of the men. In UP, sexual partners other than the spouse were seen as potential transmitters by a fairly large number of the respondents.

 

Table 5: Risk perceptions of HIV/AIDS transmission from different sexual partners by state

 

Can get HIV/AIDS and STDs from type of sexual partners

States (all figures in percentage)

Haryana

Karnataka

Orissa

Rajasthan

Uttar Pradesh

Total

Spouse

20.5

0.4

2.0

10.6

11.1

8.9

Regular female

48.6

0.4

1.4

29.3

87.2

33.3

Non-regular female

50.0

1.6

1.4

27.3

83.9

32.7

Female CSW

72.1

1.4

36.8

47.9

93.8

50.4

Male CSW

58.9

-

0.8

5.0

64.9

25.7

Any male partner

39.8

-

0.3

5.2

56.0

20.1

Total number of respondents

570

570

590

601

579

2910

Sexuality

 

Particularly in view of the low use of condoms, the nature of the sexual acts in which men generally engage becomes significant. The qualitative data from sexual histories suggested that anal and oral sex is not uncommon.

 

Open mouth kissing is higher with ‘regular non-commercial’ and ‘casual’ partners, than with a spouse or a sex worker. Not many reported open mouth kissing with male partners.

 

Mutual masturbation was also reported to be high with non-marital sexual partners. While there are no known cases of transmission through mutual masturbation, masturbation of a partner poses a theoretical risk of HIV transmission if his or her sexual secretions come in contact with mucous membrane or broken skin.

 

‘Oral’ and ‘anal penetration’ is also high with ‘regular non-commercial’ and ‘sex workers’. While close to two thirds of those with male partners reported to have penetrated the partner, one-third reported receiving anal penetration. A higher proportion of those with male partners reported having received oral sexual gratification.

 

The data presented here (Table 6) suggests that sexual acts practiced in rural areas are varied and include unprotected anal, oral and vaginal sex. Thus, they present opportunities for risk in absence of condom use. All forms of unprotected penetrative sexual intercourse (anal, vaginal, oral) with an HIV-infected man or woman carry a risk of transmission, because they bring body fluids secreted during sex directly into contact with exposed mucous membranes (the lining of the rectum, the vagina, the urethra and the mouth).

 

Unprotected receptive anal intercourse is one of the riskiest practices. The fact that no condom use was reported in any male-to-male sex, is a matter of serious concern. In fact anal sex is more risky even when a condom is used, because of the increased likelihood of damage to the condom during this form of sex. Unprotected vaginal intercourse carries the next highest risk of infection. Oral sex also carries a small risk of transmission, particularly if there are mouth or throat injuries present such as bleeding gums, ulcers, sores, abscessed teeth, throat infections, or oral STDs present.

 

Table 6: Sexual Acts by Men in Recent Sexual Encounter by Different Types of Sexual Partners: All-India

 

Sexual Act

Spouse

 

(2290)

Regular non-commercial (218)

Sex

Workers

(81)

Casual

 

(263)

Male

 

(125)

Open mouth kissing

Biting

Oral on partner

Partner did oral

Anal (penetrated)

Anal (received)

Masturbated partner

Partner masturbated

Vaginal penetration

Ejaculated outside

65.0

29.9

2.3

1.5

3.1

--

10.6

12.7

95.8

2.8

81.7

33.2

7.8

6.4

10.1

--

14.2

20.2

89.4

9.7

63.0

18.5

8.6

7.4

8.6

--

22.2

32.2

88.5

3.7

70.0

34.2

5.7

4.2

3.0

--

10.6

11.8

92.4

6.1

15.2

5.6

4.0

10.4

72.0

29.6

55.2

52.0

--

20.0

 

 

Younger unmarried respondents (18-24 years) are more likely to admit to having been exposed to ‘blue films’ (films with explicit sexual content), consuming alcohol and to report having experienced pre-marital sex than their older counterparts. They are also more aware about HIV/AIDS. Basic characteristics of unmarried and married men who reported pre-marital and extra-marital sex respectively are reported in Table 7.

 

Table 7: Factors associate with the pre-marital sex among unmarried men and extra-marital sex among currently married men in the past 12 months.

 

 

Characteristics

 

% Unmarried had sex in last 12 months (N=559)

% married had sex in the past 12 months (N=2351)

Age (in yrs.)

Less than 24

25+

31.8

37.3

16.4

14.8

Education

Illiterate

Up to primary

Secondary

And Higher

33.3

33.1

35.5

29.5

14.2

18.3

14.8

13.0

Heard of HIV/AIDS

Yes

No

36.4

35.5

15.3

14.6

Watch Blue Films

Yes

No

48.1**

25.9

22.2**

10.3

Consume Alcohol

Yes

No

58.7**

26.4

22.6**

10.2

            **Chi Square significant at .000 level

 

Education levels do not seem to be much related to the reporting of extra-marital sexual relationships. Married men with little education were found to have somewhat higher levels of extra-marital activities. However, this tendency was not found among the illiterate males, so both the least educated and the most educated are likely to indulge less in extra-marital sexual activity. However, the differences between educated and non-educated men are not very large.

 

More important is the evidence, among both married and unmarried men, that watching blue films and consumption of alcohol are both very strong indicators of more sexual activity, including more risky sexual activity. Men who watch blue films and consume alcohol are twice as likely to be involved in extra-marital and risky sexual activities.

 

Male informants listed a total of 136 different acts of sexual intimacy and sexual contact; women respondents listed about 87 different acts. The most common acts are given below in Tables 8 and 9.

 

Table 8: Free-List of Sexual Acts through which Men and Women Generally Express their Sexuality and Intimacy as Reported by Rural Married and Unmarried Men:

All Sample Sites Combined (N=67)

 

Sexual Acts:

Percent:

 1. Fondling/pressing/squeezing breast

 2. Kissing lips/belly/neck etc.

 3. Man on woman vaginal (different positions)

 4. Men masturbate selves

 5. Hugging

 6. Anal with woman

 7. Women masturbate themselves

 8. Man sex with man

 9. Touching genitals

10. Sex with animal

11. Stroking hair

12. Biting

13. Rubbing bodies

62

52

48

48

34

24

21

17

17

17

14

10

10

 

Table 9: Free-List of Sexual Acts through which Men and Women Generally Express their Sexuality and Intimacy as Reported by Rural Married Women:

All Sample Sites Combined (N=32)

 

Sexual Acts:

Percent:

 1. Kissing lips/belly/neck etc.

 2. Fondling/pressing/squeezing breast

 3. Man on woman vaginal (different positions)

 4. Hugging

 5. Body caressing

 6. Anal with woman

 7. Holding hands

 8. Man performing oral sex on woman

 9. Touching genitals

10. Biting

11. Stroking hair

12. Rubbing bodies

13. Eying each other/winking

14. Bringing gifts/talking lovingly

15. Men exhibiting their genitals

73

53

53

40

40

40

27

27

27

25

25

22

22

22

10

 

 

 

While the lists do not say anything about the actual frequencies of these behaviors, or peoples’ preferences for the individual acts, they do give important clues concerning the extent to which people are aware of, and think about, these behaviors. For example, acts indicating heterosexual relations are generally more acceptable and both men and women feel less inhibited expressing them. Also, masturbation is considered a typical man’s sexual act and women do not mention this. In a patriarchal system, women’s sexual activity, particularly within marriage, is primarily viewed as a reproductive function and not for pleasure. There appears to be gender dimension with in the domain of sexuality.

 

In more detailed narratives about their own lives and sexual experiences, 117 men and 44 women ¾ who represented the more sexually active/aware sector of the sample population ¾ provided important information about these behaviors. All individuals, both men and women who agreed to talk about their sexual history, were asked to give details of their last sexual encounter. The details included who was the partner, who initiated the sex, whether it was by mutual consent and what acts were performed. It is important to note that most sexual episodes described did not last very long. Lack of space and privacy was reported to be a major constraint to engaging in sexual acts. Not surprisingly, therefore, most individuals described the entire episode as short and the sexual histories described by both men and women were full of evidence of sexual coercion or sex with an unwilling partner.

 

In the description of sexual episodes, most men used very explicit sexual language to explain the body parts of women partners. Women, on the other hand, seldom used explicit sexual language and very rarely expressed enjoyment as a part of sex, unless specially probed by the investigator. None of the women respondents talked about extra-marital relationships. Some women, however, did talk about their pre-marital sexual experiences.

 

Sources of sexual information

 

The study found that men receive sexual information from sources as varied as friends, family members, doctor, books/magazines, films and schools. Besides these, they also mentioned ‘other sources’ such as their own experiences, wives and women other than their wives. Some men reported receiving sexual information from parents and close relatives, though the proportion of men who mentioned parents as the primary source is very low or negligible (Figure 10).

 

To understand the importance given to these sources, men were asked to rank each source in order of its perceived importance as compared to other sources in giving out information on sexual matters. The lower rank value indicated higher importance of the source. Most men ranked ‘friends’ (average rank value = 1.27) as the primary source followed by ‘other sources’ (1.62), other family members (2.02), doctors (2.04), books/magazines (2.10), films (2.24), and school (2.34). It is interesting to note that men do mentioned films and books/magazines quite frequently but they do not rank them highly as the primary sources.

 

At the state level also it is seen that ‘friends’ continued to be the primary source of sexual information, barring Rajasthan where ‘mother’ emerged as the main source. However, there is difference in the second most important source. While it is the ‘other family members’ in Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, it is ‘doctors’ for men in Karnataka, ‘books and magazines’ in Orissa, and ‘friends’ for men in Rajasthan.

 

 

Conclusions

 

The study uncovers a pattern of sexual behaviors in rural India. Findings provide useful clues for designing behaviour change communication interventions with special reference to prevention of STIs including HIV/AIDS.

 

The study findings suggest that sexual acts practiced in rural areas are varied and include oral and unprotected anal and vaginal sex. Thus, they present opportunities for risk in absence of condom use. The presence of violence and coercive sex makes the sexual relationships more risky for women and young men.

 

Exposure to sexual intercourse to an average Indian is closely associated with the age at marriage. However, one in every three unmarried man had sexual intercourse in the 12 months prior to the survey. A little over one in every four married man reported sexual intercourse before marriage. 

 

The findings also point out that sexual activity takes place during the period of gauna. So far there is very little appreciation of reaching out to these couples that are awaiting formal consummation of marriage, yet are desperate to debut in sexual activity.

 

A large number of men reported having sex with casual partners who they did not think to be risky. These one-off sexual encounters were characteristics of both married and unmarried men.

 

Of particular concern is the fact that both married and unmarried men reported very poor/infrequent use of condoms in both casual and commercial sex. The challenge now is to position condoms as a sex accessory for enhancing sexual pleasure.  

   

While the level of paid sex with females in rural areas seems to be particularly low, it is pertinent to note that 50 per cent of men were found to consider female sex workers as potential carriers of HIV/AIDS. Male sex workers were not seen to be as risky. While all forms of penetrative sexual intercourse (anal, vaginal, oral) with an HIV-infected man or woman carry the risk of transmission, anal intercourse is highly risky even with protection because of the increased likelihood that the condom will be damaged during this form of sex. The fact that no condom use was reported in any male-to-male sex, that essentially involved anal sex, is a matter of serious concern.

 

It is crucial that BCC programmes should also include messages on MSM, as so far transmission of HIV/AIDS through this mode have not been given due emphasis in main stream communication.

 

Qualitative data also brought out the presence of coercion in sexual relations or sex with an unwilling partner. Unmarried men described instances when their friend not only justified but supported coercive sex with an unwilling partner. The presence of violence and coercive sex makes sexual relationships riskier for women and young men. Violence against women, especially sexual coercion and sexual violence, poses serious challenges in the context of unwanted pregnancies and infections. Reproductive health programmes should also acknowledge the need for emergency contraception for cases of sexual violence, screening and treatment of infections.

 

The individual sexual histories of both men and women reveal gender differences in the performance of sexual acts. While some acts were reported more often in some research locations rather than others, the in-depth interviews in Haryana revealed a consistent pattern of forced sexual acts in which men performed anal sex with women, women performed oral sex for men, and women masturbated men.

 

It may be relevant to mention here that the issues related to sexuality are far more complex and go much beyond concerns relating to numbers and types of sexual partners and sexual practices. There is a need to start addressing the social, cultural and economic contexts within which sexuality is expressed and sexual behavior enacted.

 

There is need for building deeper understanding on the issues of sex and sexuality in the context of rural India.  The study points out that lack of space and privacy in rural areas were reportedly major constraints to having ‘sex’. It would also be pertinent to note that while men were explicit in their description of the fun and enjoyment they derived or did not derive from the sexual act and used explicit words, women very rarely expressed enjoyment of sex. Adolescent reproductive and sexual health programmes should include addressing issues related to sex and sexuality in the context of equitable gender relations. While more in-depth analysis would be needed, it is evident that any educational intervention program will have to keep the gender perspective and the social power structure in mind. The study also highlights the need for assessing local cultural specifics to be used as a medium for such programmes.

 

It is quite clear that men do not learn about sex and sexuality from schools, health facilities and parents. It is very likely that the knowledge they have about sexuality will not be scientific enough to protect them from some of the sexually transmitted diseases and undesirable behaviors. The finding is important in the context of BCC programmes and in the design of such interventions.

 

In this document an attempt has been made to present the sexual behavior parameters within the varying rural contexts and our attempt is to first understand the situation.   Findings demonstrate that rural areas present a complex and challenging scenario to address the AIDS epidemic. There are important cultural differences among the regions in India that contribute to significant differences in sexuality.

 

Stereotypes about sexuality at the national level are not helpful. It is incumbent on researchers and interventionists to not assume they know sexuality and sexual behavior given the level of variation demonstrated in this report.

 

The findings of this study suggest the great importance of research aimed at identifying special pockets of greater sexual activity, as these are sub-populations that are especially vulnerable to HIV/AIDS and other health risks.

 

Qualitative data also indicates that sexual acts are viewed as essentially having four distinct and mutually exclusive sub domains. These are “heterosexual acts”, “non heterosexual acts” (largely MSM), “oral sex” and “non penetrative sexual acts”. Understandably there is a need for more in depth studies to understand the dynamics of these sexual behaviors so that communication programmes can also be designed accordingly.


 

Reference

 

1.      AIMS Research (1997). Attitudes towards and use of Condoms among men in Orissa, (a Report), British Council Division and Department for International Development.

2.      Collumbien, M et al (1999) “Male sexual health concerns in Orissa: An academic perspective”, Paper for IUSSP Conference, September, Cairo, Egypt.

3.      Rangaiyan G. and Verma, Ravi K. (1999) “A Study of High Risk Sexual Behaviour among Male College Students in Mumbai”, Paper presented in the 5th International Conference on AIDS in Asia and Pacific (ICAAP), October 23-27, 199, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

4.      Verma Ravi K, Rangaiyan, G Nerkhede, S.I., Agarwal M., and Pelto P.J. (1998) Cultural Perceptions and Categorizations of Male Sexual Health problems by Practitioners and Men in a Mumbai Slum Population, Ford Foundation Working Papers Series.

 

 

 

 


 

[1] Gauna refers to a cultural practice of bringing bride to the house of the groom first time after the marriage. In some parts of the country where the practice of early marriage is prevalent, the ‘bringing home’ of bride and allowing the bride and the groom to live together i.e., consummation of marriage takes place after a considerable time gap.