instead of SCHWA:  grace note, or dot, or deletion mark, or placeholder character (a suggestion)

why? because the sound falsely represented by the schwa is either a trivial part of a dipthong, leads into a consonant, or may be considered a part of the word that does not subclassify properly by phoneme.

"power strategy, "power play, "power object, "power jockeying

 [in reverse alfabetical order, moving towards "power [sic] broker]

"power jockeying, "power object, "power play, "power strategy

 [in alfabetical order, moving away from "power [sic] broker]                                                        

   Can metonymic projection loop? bee-4-hive type may: "the government issued [such and such] statement, "the White House erred, "the Vatican snored - for example- then in reverse- perhaps "hormonal messenger &c.

   Looping per se to be detected, would require a matching pair of these. And yet, and yet- any pair extant 2 be matched, somewhere in the mind, is a forklift tape-path leading toward hazard. "Enriched" bleached flour, anyone?

                   It always goes places. Sun Tzu/Hitler-parallels are a common phenomenon resulting from the bleeding of representations of competitivity from arena to arena.  Remedial fearsetting-  a twin/dopplegaenger race rabbit race rabbit chase gone kissy-kissy, a rainbow of irrational alteration of forced supposed necessity.

(spintactics - spintactitastic - spinfabricative)

aspiuhfpiu hp aoi oih9 o 03h o hpoias fu-s iuaip;s onfoi aosuiobn foisn oasfdoi nasbod nsi 9an ofnsindnqw;;c alsf klaofnsalkdn  lfdcasn

(!) 

   the "schwa" - a bizarre holdover from the 1970's? a Project Paperclip wet dream? It's worse than fluoridated city water - a ubuiquitous, silent, weapon, easily conforming itself to any shape within any

word, a Teletubbie, a degeneracy-virus penetrating every phonemic crevice. Eerily, even pleasantly, trotted out as "established" or "accepted", yet clearly  accepted only under duress and by clouded minds. And whom does it effect?

Do Russian dictionaries (the ones printed in Russian, in Russia) have schwa"s?    

   The proper way to phonemically represent the sounds falsely represented by the "schwa", as may have been done in some previous era, is a crossed-thru one of those uncial capital E's, or a crossed-thru neutral phonemic vowel closest to the one written. Schwa is used to

substitute for, inotherwords despecify,  a variety of now-unstressed syllables, the reason for despecification remaining perhaps ill-advised, and yet unquestionable.

   Schwa is used  to aid in the glossing-over of any "becoming" in language, as if a placeholder for placeholding itself-- a mysterious and quiet time machine:  time thawed by the "schwa", as it

accelerates the reader into a future that will never arrive, a future where all unstressed syllables are basically indistinguishable, then snaps him/her back into the present where superficiality and 

mincing have rounded the teeth and weakened the gums so as 2 cause speakers 2 avoid all sensitivity and articulation wherever possible, such as inbetween syllables. The introduction of the "schwa"

informs, expertly, that one must slur one's speech. It is another devious sort of device-aiding-device, a device aid, for it remains, during the day, unexamined, inocuously supporting slyness and

insinuity in white-on-white racism, &c., emerging at night 2 give life 2 the whirlwind. The "schwa" functions as a makeshift drycleaning tag, showing up whatever else is correct or corrected, where it is not. It is a made-in-China,

generically outsourced substitute-brand cushion in the train couplings of a word or phrase, sucking the life out of it, making it look necessary or normal or inevitable. It is a swastika.