IS THE US UNDER MARTIAL LAW?

"Without Prejudice' UCC 1-207

The Model State Emergency Powers Act (MEHPA)

The Emergency powers proposal would usher in martial law under the guise of “public health”. (Research, www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA.pdf.

The text of the MEHPA give public health officials, state governors and state officials serving as “emergency judges” the power to arrest, transport, isolate, intern and quarantine any individual. The Act also gives public health officials the power to drug, examine, vaccinate and detain any individual. Forced inoculations may either cause death or other types of disease in certain individuals. These officials will have the authority to control, restrict and regulate, food, fuel, clothing, transportation, and housing. They will have the power to confiscate all firearms, as well as separating families by isolating children from their parents. The State will confiscate personal and commercial bank accounts as needed to fund the declared emergencies. The Federal Government will not have the manpower, social services or funding to meet a “public health emergency”. The governor will have the authority to declare an emergency for not only a bioterrorist attack, but also for epidemics, pandemic disease or natural disasters. The terms “epidemic disease” “pandemic disease” and “natural disaster” are not defined, leaving public health officials ample room for their own interpretation.

There are no limits on the number or types of tests that can be performed on an individual. There are no time limits for the length of time individuals can be isolated, detained and interned. The term property is not limited to just land and buildings on that land. Again, it includes all real property within the state.

Citizens who refuse to comply under the authority of these appointed health officials will be arrested, jailed and fined. Police officers will be placed under the authority of the state health department.

The proposal states “Neither the state, its political subdivisions, including the governor, public health authorities, the police or other state officials will not be held liable for the death or injury to persons, or damage to property as a result of complying with or attempting to comply with this Act or any rules promulgated to this Act”.

Once such an emergency is declared, the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights all of our civil liberties will be immediately suspended in addition to the state being empowered to take immediate possession of all private property under the doctrine of “eminent domain”.

Under Section (406) for example “Compensation shall not be provided for facilities or materials that are closed, evacuated, decontaminated, or destroyed when there is reasonable cause to believe that they may endanger public health.”

Under Section (502) Forced isolation could possibly marshal thousands of people into overcrowded and dangerous open-air internment camps according to the law.

The U.S. Army now has revised their Field Training manual FM 3-19.40. This outlines the fundamentals of Internment/Resettlement Operations.

(Research, http://www.adtdl.army.mil/cgi-bin/atdl.dll/fm/3-19.40/toc.htm)

Effectively, U.S. taxpayers are underwriting our own change in government. Mr. Lawrence O. Gostin, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and Director of the Center for Law and the Public’s Health and Mr. James G. Hodge of John Hopkins University were each paid $300,000 dollars for three years to develop this forty page document for each of the 50 state governors as an outline for their respective legislatures. “This law treats American citizens as if they were the enemy”. (George Annas, chairman of the Health Law Department at the Boston University School of Public Health.

You can do something about this and it has to happen quickly. Go to www.aapsonline.org and click on the Emergency Dictatorial Powers Act in the left column. Then click on the December 13th Action Alert, which will provide information on how to respond to your legislators. Send this document to everyone on your email list.

•THE BIG QUESTION IS - IS THE US UNDER MARTIAL LAW? OR IS IT JUST THE NWO COMING?

In 1861, with the advent of Lincoln we actually underwent an American revolution because the very nature of our governmental system was overthrown.

MY UNANSWERED EMAIL QUESTIONS TO REP. RON PAUL AND OTHERS

"When seven Southern states walked out of Congress March 27, 1861, the quorum to conduct business under the Constitution, was lost. The only votes Congress could lawfully take, under parliamentary law, were those to set the time to re-convene, take a vote to get a quorum, and vote to adjourn and set a date, time, and place to re-convene at a later time.

Instead, Congress adjourned sine die (pronounced see-na dee-a), i.e., ‘without day.’ “An adjournment sine die—that is, without day—closes the session, and if there is no provision for convening the assembly again, of course the adjournment dissolves the assembly.”

Thus, when Congress adjourned sine die it ceased to exist as a lawful body. The only lawful constitutional power who could declare war on the South, was no longer lawful, or in session.

Congress did not reconvene until days later when it was re-convened under military authority of the Commander-in-Chief. To this day, Congress still sits by military authority of the Commander-in-Chief, and not as a lawful Constitutional body. More evidence for this is in any official set of U.S. Titles and Codes. In the Index of Titles in Volume One one finds either;

a. Title II, The Congress is marked with an asterisk and the note at the bottom of the page will indicate that the Congress exists by Resolution, not positive law, or;

b. All positive law titles are marked by asterisk and Title II, The Congress has none. In this case the footnote states that those marked with an asterisk exist by virtue of positive law.

The point here is, Congress knew the rules of parliamentary law and knew that it could have adjourned lawfully, but instead, chose a method that the Congress knew would destroy the law making power of Congress. In other words, the campaigns of the commercial speculators, banks, and others in Congress had been successful. The Constitution for the United States of America had ceased to be the law of the land, and the President, Congress, and the Courts were now free to re-make the nation in its own image.

The Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the union, also ceased to exist sine die. And, those state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die as, for example, occurred in California in April 27, 1863.

Thus, all the states who were parties to creating the Constitution ceased to exist and new states were created in their place as Franchisees of the Federal corporation, so that a new Union of the United States could be created.

From that time on, all Presidents have ruled by Executive Order. Lincoln wrote only a handful of E.O.’s during his tenure. Executive Order No. 1, the first ever signed by a President was executed April 21st, 1861, and called up 75,000 militia. other E.O.’s are issued under the authority of the Commander-in-Chief by the Adjutant General, the Treasury, and others.

The point is, Lincoln had no authority to issue Executive Orders and he knew it. Thus, he commissioned a special code to ‘govern’ his acts under martial law. In fact, the Code merely justified his seizure of power. “The Lieber Instructions,” extended The Laws of War and International law beyond the borders of Washington, D.C., and for the first time brought foreign law onto American soil.

The United States government became the conqueror and all states in the Union were thus re-formed as Franchisees of the Federal Corporation. The key to when the states became Federal Franchisees is related to the date when such states enacted the Field Code in law. The Field Code was a codification of the common law that was adopted first, by New York and by California in 1872.

Later, the Lieber Code put the U.S. into the 1874 Brussels Conference (two years after Washington, D.C., became a corporation), and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

The Lieber Code explicitly stated in Section I, Article 1., that:

“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest.”

Lincoln imposed Martial Law on America without public notice. Americans could thus be arrested (falsely mustered), hauled into military tribunals, tried, convicted, sentenced, put in jail, have all their property seized, and put to death, without ever knowing the trials were in fact, military proceedings in court martial against civilians.

In such military courts no defendant has any Constitutional rights.

The Code goes on to say in the same Section, Article 10. that:

“Martial Law affects chiefly the police and collection of public revenue and taxes whether imposed by the expelled government or by the invader, and refers mainly to the support and efficiency of the army, its safety, and the safety of its operations.”

Is it mere ‘coincidence’ that the I.R.S. was born during this period, in 1863? It collected war reparations from the conquered peoples in the South. Later, F.D. Roosevelt went Lincoln one better when he extended the same unconstitutional acts to all the states.

The Lieber Code then states in Section II, Article 31., that:

“A victorious army appropriates all public money, seizes all public movable property until further direction by its government, and sequesters for its own benefit or that of its government all revenues of real property belonging to the hostile government or nation. The title to such real property remains in abeyance during military occupation, and until the conquest is made complete.”

Under Martial Law, one’s title is a mere fiction, since all property belongs to the military except for that property which the Commander-in-Chief may, in his benevolence, exempt from taxation and seizure and upon which he allows the enemy to reside.

After Lincoln, a new type of government was born in America when the District of Columbia was incorporated in 1872. In the U.S. Titles and Codes, the District of Columbia can also be called, the “United States.” Why did the federal power need a corporation?

The answer is, first, martial law governments are—in law—styled as ‘fictional creations.’ Second, the doctrine of equal standing in law makes it clear that only parties of equal standing can communicate in law. The maxim of Law is; “Disparata non debent jungi—Dissimilar things ought not to be joined.” Third, since such governments are fictions, they can only deal with fictions and are thus, prohibited from re-creating lawful civil authority.

Only the people have the sole and exclusive right, power, and authority to alter, abolish, or create a Lawful Civil government. Therefore, since corporations are also fictions, they became the logical means through which the new government carried on its business. Notice however, the substance of the government is now gone, and it retains only the outward form and appearance. After Lincoln’s War ended and hostilities were declared at an end, the Lieber Code justified keeping martial law a secret. Part of the evidence for the continuation of martial law is seen in an address given by Andrew Johnson, Lincoln’s successor, in which he gives his reasons for vetoing the Reconstruction Acts.

“The veto of the original bill of the 2d of March was based on two distinct grounds, the interference of Congress in matters strictly appertaining to the reserved powers of the States, and the establishment of military tribunals for the trial of citizens in time of peace.” July 19, 1867

The nation was still under Martial Law and Congress knew it though the People have, from that day to this been ignorant of the fact. And, the U. S. is under no obligation to tell the People anything regarding their true status, nor to promote reconstruction of the Lawful civil authority. "

If the above is true then there is no US Constitution for the Republic because there is no Republic; and the US GOVERNMENT IS A FRAUD!

IF there is no Republic - the US is under martial law and has been !

If possible I would like to ask the following questions, I'll try to keep them to a few.

Is the US is under Martial Law or Rule by Lincoln from 1861?

Is the US is under Martial Law or Rule by the Federal Reserve Act?

Is the US is under Martial Law or Rule by FDRs Actions while in office?

Is the US is under Martial Law or Rule by any President at the present time?

Is the US is under Martial Law or Rule by the United Nations?

We are under the 14th Amendment (which from my readings is like the 16th) B.Benson - non-ratification.

The following link : ( I have no idea as to the truth in this link I can't seem to find the Senators address or phone to contact him ) Preamble Citizen (de jure Citizen).

How does a person get back to being a Preamble Citizen and the Constitution and what is the use if the Common Law courts are gone in the state and federal courts? Our courts in fla are admiralty jurisdiction. State Constitution said something about common law, but I'd have to recheck that.

WHY HAVE Chapter XI. Common Law Court: These courts have been declared non-existent? 1. Kimmel v. Burnet County Appraisal Dist., 835 S.W.2d 108, 109 (Tex.App. 1992). If we are still under the "Constitutional Republic" that this Nation was formed as?

So, it would seem that the States jurisdiction of Admiralty would not reach a Preamble Citizen (if there is such a status) because of lack of jurisdiction.

Is a Declaration of Expatriation to the US Inc/Repatriation to the Republic the answer to the jurisdiction problem that which the Sentator is saying ? I saw the Story cite and others on birth rights and certs.

Is "Something is missing" in public knowledge or is their a government cover up?

"The statement by Chief Justice Taney in Dred Scott v. Stanford, 19 How. 393, 422, in defining the term "persons" the Judge stated: ...persons who are not recognized as Citizens.

I've read the "big C / little c "stuff on citizenship, if the above statements by the Senator are true; Where is the answer to status? and does it make a difference if the admiralty jurisdiction rules the courts ?

"This was the intent of Congress; not to infringe upon the Constitution or the state of the de jure Citizens of the several states. It was never the intent of the 14th Amendment to subvert the States' authority or that of the Constitution as it relates to the status of the de jure State Citizens. "

"1. Preamble Citizen: persons born or naturalized within the meaning of the Organic Constitution and inhabiting one of the several Republics of the United States who enjoy full citizenship of the Organic Constitution as Citizens of the Republic which they inhabit. "

1. Preamble Citizens:

a. Have direct personal access to a God inspired, original Constitution and it's restraints on government for the protection of life, liberty and property.

b. Have direct personal access to the Article III courts known as "justice courts" which deal with law. "

"The final question then would seem to be "where is the article III "justice" court and who can use it? I am very aware that many of the folks reading this article are not going to be able to use the justice courts, as they have natural or acquired deficiencies that will not allow them Preamble Citizenship, but for the people endowed with the proper qualifications, it appears that the straight line approach of barring jurisdiction of legislative courts (tribunals) through recision of contracts and declaration of Article IV, Section 2 status is essential, as it appears that only Preamble People can exercise the offices as set forth in the Organic Constitution. Additionally, it seems that this same class (Preamble People) is the only class that may claim the protection of the first ten Amendments as written. "

"As the truth of our personal status, and the responsibilities connected therewith unfolds, it becomes clear that the Article III "justice" court must be accessed individually by the person claiming the right. At present it is being done by common law filing of actions "in law" with the County Recorders who have been found to be "ex officio" clerks of the County courts. The authority for the exercise of the "justice" office is found in the 9th Article of Amendment and I believe all State Constitutions have similar provisions for the Preamble Citizens (also known as de jure Citizens). "

What would the natural or acquired deficiencies that will not allow the Preamble Citizenship?

It would seem the invisible contracts ,ssn,birth certificate, international treaties, etc come into to play here.

NO GOVERNMENT, PERSON OR CORPORATION HAS THE RIGHT TO INSLAVE ANOTHER LIVING PERSON !

"All of the children whose birth is certified by a State are registered in the Bureau of Federal Children. These are the human resources of Government. " You can read about human resources in the United States Code, available online.

You, or their mother, in the explicitly declared natural character or capacity of man ( one of mankind ) must certify the heredity, legitimacy, and place of birth of your boys and girls to give them legal existence as people of the United States. A man stands at first base and a man is born at X, a county within the last located boundaries of State ( e.g. Iowa ) . Your offspring now have documents from government which certify them as 14th amendment first sentence persons, as Federal children, as individuals ( "business enterprises" ) and as nationals of the United States. They have been nationalized by government documents. see the Immigration & Naturalization statutes. "

Is it not the Sovereign Citizen that the state government gets its limited power from that gives limited power to the federal US government? Or have the international treaties taken away our Rights as Sovereigns ?

On the Right to Drive question (not in commerce but just to travel for private use), does the wording in the following mean something else other then whats stated? I found lots of these on different "Right to drive pages".

"Use of a highway for purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege but is a common and fundamental Right of which the Public and Individuals cannot be deprived."Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago quoted #169NE221

"Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen." Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27

"Users of the highway for transportation of persons and property for hire may be subjected to special regulations not applicable to those using the highway for public purposes." Richmond Baking Co. v. Department of Treasury 18 N.E. 2d 788.

"The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. ..." Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872

"The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts." People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012, and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E. 579.

WHAT IS THE TRUTH?

I've read most of the UN/NWO pages, the UCC stuff, the Mericer stuff, the REDEMPTION stuff, the Notice of Truth stuff, the Affidavit of Sovereignty, the birth cert stuff, the driver lic stuff, the Status stuff, the SSN stuff, the Expatriation/Repatriation stuff, patriot & soverneignty stuff, etc and all the historic papers (Constitution, Bill of Rights, Mag, Cart., Federalists Papers, Anti-federalists papers, etc.). I have collected SC cites on treaties not over riding the Constitution, the driver not in commerce being able to travel, unconstitutional laws being void, etc.

The governments and courts not talking, explaining or answering anyone. WHY?

The following apply to the above questions.

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." --Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137 (1803)

"There is no position which depends on clearer principles than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid." Federalist Papers No. 78, Alexander Hamilton

"In a contest between the Constitution and treaties, the Constitution prevails. As the Supreme Court explained in Reid vs.Covert (1957), in an opinion joined by civil-libertarian icons Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices Hugo Black,William O. Douglas and William Brennan:

"No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on Congress, or on any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution. . . .It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights, let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions."

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights, "was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." Supreme Court Justice Jackson 1943

"We [public servants] have no more right to decline the jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall stated in Cohens v Virginia, 6 wheat (19 U.S.) 264, 404:
"The congress of the United States possesses no power to regulate, or interfere with the domestic concerns, or police of any state: it belongs not to them to establish any rules respecting the rights of property; nor will the constitution permit any prohibition of arms to the people. ..." (Saint George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries, 1803, Volume 1,Appendix, Note D).

"No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).

"It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."- U.S. Supreme Court -339 U.S. 382, 447

"It should be the highest ambition of every American to extend his views beyond himself, and to bear in mind that his conduct will not only affect himself, his country, and his immediate posterity; but that its influence may be co-extensive with the world, and stamp political happiness or misery on ages yet unborn. "— George Washington

"The consolidation of the states into one vast Republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded it." General Robert E. Lee

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, ( 1809 )

"The United States goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is a well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. If the United States took up all foreign affairs, it would become entangled in all the wars of interest and intrigue, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own soul." President John Quincy Adams

Spooner - A Letter to Grover Cleveland, on His False Inaugural Addrewss, The Usurpations and Crimes of Lawmakers and Judges, and the Consequent Poverty, Ignorance, and Servitude of the People (1886).click here

In 1946 the judges at Nuremberg who tried the Nazi leaders for war crimes left no doubt about what they regarded as the gravest crimes against humanity.

"The most serious was unprovoked invasion of a sovereign state that offered no threat to one's homeland. Then there was the murder of civilians, for which responsibility rested with the "highest authority". click here

Cheney said that everything is on schedule for completion by January 2005, of the "Free Trade Area of the Americas" ( FTAA ) The FTAA will become the "American Union"

“to maintain the United States’ position as the world’s only super power and to allow no other super powers to emerge.” 1992 Cheney and Wolfowitz

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed and thus clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken

Congressman JC Watts ( R. Oklahoma ) said, "Character,... is doing the right thing when nobody is looking,"

"We paid $3 billion for these television stations, we'll decide what the news is. The news is what we tell you it is." Fox News General Manager

"This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.'' -Plato,

"In a world of universal deceit...speaking the truth becomes a revolutionary act". George Orwell --1984.

"Whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force. . .' --Thomas Jefferson, The Kentucky Resolutions,

A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.''Thomas Jefferson

"Suppose you were an idiot . . . . And suppose you were a member of Congress . . . . But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea - a New World Order - George H W Bush, State of the Union 1991

The Global Gulag is the inevitable result from the design for a world - ruled by Elites - that lust for total domination and control. Let no one be mistaken, for no one can escape. The enemy of humanity has planned long and manipulated well. Their scheme for earthly society has the individual reduced to a slave on a plantation of global proportions. Their New World Order is no longer the butt of jokes or conspiracy ridicule. It is FACT! It exists and even the sheeple are coming to the realization that they are mere captives in a sick game of a universal realm. REALITY can't be refuted with lies or denied with delusion. America has lost her last remnants of a Constitutional Republic. The Bill of Rights is in shambles. Coercion and force is the order of the day. Law has been discarded for contrived equity. Elites rule with impunity and are no longer accountable. The actuality of the NWO is paraded as the only order. Those who resist its reach are targets of its wrath and vengeance. Freedom fighters will be labeled terrorists. Ordinary citizens will be called criminals. And anyone who seeks to restore the principles of the 1776 Revolution will be hunted down as an “Enemy of the State”."

"Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it." — George Santayana

"As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there's a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight that we must be aware of change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness." Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas

Theodore Roosevelt offered us an important reminder on what patriotism really means in 1918

"Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President or any other public official save exactly to the degree in which he himself stands by the country. It is patriotic to support him in so far as he efficiently serves the country. It is unpatriotic not to oppose him to the exact extent that by inefficiency or otherwise he fails in his duty to stand by the country. In either event, it is unpatriotic not to tell the truth — whether about the President or about any one else — save in the rare cases where this would make known to the enemy information of military value which would otherwise be unknown to him.

Whatever faults critics may find with Teddy Roosevelt, he was certainly a patriot. And who would question the patriotic credentials of George Washington, the patriot nonpareil? Yet, in his wise and eloquent Farewell Address, President Washington warned his countrymen against "the mischiefs of foreign intrigue" and "the impostures of pretended patriotism." Those cautions are especially apropos to this moment, when pretended patriotism is being called into service of the most mischievous foreign intrigues."

SOCIALISTS -U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein ( D/CA )

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them. "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in," I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here." -U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein ( D/CA ) speaking of her authorship of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban on "60 Minutes" 2/5/95

Judging America

In 1976, the facist SA government out raged the world by passing their Terrorism Act of 76 which gave them the power to detain anyone they thought was a terrorist without any "due process." The world imposed sanchions on SA, including the US. (Remember the US outlawing the purchase of the SA Krugerrand?)

Are Bush/Cheney, Ashcroft, the US courts and congress above the law?

• THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE - IF YOU LET IT !

Terra Libra Concept Test, Sun Tzu, Goebbels and Britt

If the following sound like America thats because America is in name only because American people lost America to the NWO.

The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism

Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler ( Germany ) , Mussolini ( Italy ) , Franco ( Spain ) , Suharto ( Indonesia ) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.

6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.

Goebbels' 19 Principles

1. Propagandist must have access to intelligence concerning events and public opinion.

2. Propaganda must be planned and executed by only one authority.

a. It must issue all the propaganda directives

b. It must explain propaganda directives to important officials and maintain their morale

c. It must oversee other agencies' activities which have propaganda consequences

3. The propaganda consequences of an action must be considered in planning that action.

4. Propaganda must affect the enemy's policy and action.

a. By suppressing propagandistically desirable material which can provide the enemy with useful intelligence

b. By openly disseminating propaganda whose content or tone causes the enemy to draw the desired conclusions

c. By goading the enemy into revealing vital information about himself

d. By making no reference to a desired enemy activity when any reference would discredit that activity

5. Declassified, operational information must be available to implement a propaganda campaign

6. To be perceived, propaganda must evoke the interest of an audience and must be transmitted through an attention-getting communications medium.

7. Credibility alone must determine whether propaganda output should be true or false.

8. The purpose, content and effectiveness of enemy propaganda; the strength and effects of an expose; and the nature of current propaganda campaigns determine whether enemy propaganda should be ignored or refuted.

9. Credibility, intelligence, and the possible effects of communicating determine whether propaganda materials should be censored.

10. Material from enemy propaganda may be utilized in operations when it helps diminish that enemy's prestige or lends support to the propagandist's own objective.

11. Black rather than white propaganda may be employed when the latter is less credible or produces undesirable effects.

12. Propaganda may be facilitated by leaders with prestige.

13. Propaganda must be carefully timed.

a. The communication must reach the audience ahead of competing propaganda.

b. A propaganda campaign must begin at the optimum moment

c. A propaganda theme must be repeated, but not beyond some point of diminishing effectiveness

14. Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.

a. They must evoke desired responses which the audience previously possesses

b. They must be capable of being easily learned

c. They must be utilized again and again, but only in appropriate situations

d. They must be boomerang-proof

15. Propaganda to the home front must prevent the raising of false hopes which can be blasted by future events.

16. Propaganda to the home front must create an optimum anxiety level.

a. Propaganda must reinforce anxiety concerning the consequences of defeat

b. Propaganda must diminish anxiety ( other than concerning the consequences of defeat ) which is too high and which cannot be reduced by people themselves

17. Propaganda to the home front must diminish the impact of frustration.

a. Inevitable frustrations must be anticipated

b. Inevitable frustrations must be placed in perspective

18. Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.

19. Propaganda cannot immediately affect strong counter-tendencies; instead it must offer some form of action or diversion, or both.

Based upon "Goebbels' Principles of Propaganda" by Leonard W. Doob published in "Public Opinion and Propaganda; A Book of Readings edited for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.

Sun Tzu

1. Sun Tzu said: In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.

2. Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.

3. Thus the highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy's plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy's forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy's army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.

4. The rule is, not to besiege walled cities if it can possibly be avoided. The preparation of mantlets, movable shelters, and various implements of war, will take up three whole months; and the piling up of mounds over against the walls will take three months more.

5. The general, unable to control his irritation, will launch his men to the assault like swarming ants, with the result that one-third of his men are slain, while the town still remains untaken. Such are the disastrous effects of a siege.

6. Therefore the skillful leader subdues the enemy's troops without any fighting; he captures their cities without laying siege to them; he overthrows their kingdom without lengthy operations in the field.

7. With his forces intact he will dispute the mastery of the Empire, and thus, without losing a man, his triumph will be complete. This is the method of attacking by stratagem.

8. It is the rule in war, if our forces are ten to the enemy's one, to surround him; if five to one, to attack him; if twice as numerous, to divide our army into two.

9. If equally matched, we can offer battle; if slightly inferior in numbers, we can avoid the enemy; if quite unequal in every way, we can flee from him.

10. Hence, though an obstinate fight may be made by a small force, in the end it must be captured by the larger force.

11. Now the general is the bulwark of the State; if the bulwark is complete at all points; the State will be strong; if the bulwark is defective, the State will be weak.

12. There are three ways in which a ruler can bring misfortune upon his army:

13 ( 1 ) By commanding the army to advance or to retreat, being ignorant of the fact that it cannot obey. This is called hobbling the army.

14 ( 2 ) By attempting to govern an army in the same way as he administers a kingdom, being ignorant of the conditions which obtain in an army. This causes restlessness in the soldier's minds.

15 ( 3 ) By employing the officers of his army without discrimination, through ignorance of the military principle of adaptation to circumstances. This shakes the confidence of the soldiers.

16. But when the army is restless and distrustful, trouble is sure to come from the other feudal princes. This is simply bringing anarchy into the army, and flinging victory away.

17. Thus we may know that there are five essentials for victory:

( 1 ) He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight.

( 2 ) He will win who knows how to handle both superior and inferior forces.

( 3 ) He will win whose army is animated by the same spirit throughout all its ranks.

( 4 ) He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared.

( 5 ) He will win who has military capacity and is not interfered with by the sovereign.

18. Hence the saying: If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.

Terra Libra Concept Test

Can the concept be used to manipulate and control people?

Does my acceptance of the concept place me at a disadvantage?

Can somebody gain an advantage by using the concept if it isn't challenged?

Does the concept have a referent?

If so, is there a better concept/word to describe the same referent?

Now let's put "government" (as most people use the concept) to the test:

Can the concept "government" be used to manipulate and control people?

Yes,"The government is the authority we must obey."

Does my acceptance of the concept place me at a disadvantage?

Yes, I have to pay for the "privilege" of obeying the people who call themselves "government."

Can somebody gain an advantage by using the concept if it isn't challenged?

Definitely, the people who call themselves "government" enjoy the status of being masters financed by their "subjects" or slaves.

Does the concept have a referent?

Just what the referents are is not clear. They could include: people, guns, bombs, buildings, systems, pieces of paper, etc.

If so, are there better concepts/words to describe the same referents?

Yes, territorial gangsters, guns, bombs, buildings, systems, pieces of paper, etc.

To discover the extent to which some concepts are bogus, it may be necessary to dig into history (particularly revisionist history). For example, in the case of the so-called "US Constitution" we find that the 70 odd people who signed it as "We the people of the United States of America" signed it on their own behalf and made no attempt or even suggestion that it would apply to any descendants of people then living.

The people who pretend to "govern" in the name of the so-called "US Constitution" are liars and impostors. The people who kill in the name of the so-called "US Constitution" are terrorists and murderers. The people who tax in the name of the so-called "US Constitution" are thieves and robbers. Similar considerations apply to other political systems around the world.

The concepts and words we use have consequences. Concepts can be "locks" that lock us into automatic unworkable thinking and behavior. Most humans cannot question their concepts. Some advanced humans can and do. The consequences of fraud-concepts, such as "country," "constitution," "government," "law," "nation," etc., include war, poverty, crime, pollution, and a host of other apparently intractable problems. Most humans cannot see this. So their "solution" is to "change the government," or to advocate "new laws," or to "smash the state." They remain stuck in the same old conceptual framework that is at the root of the problems. The results they have produced so far have been meager, to say the least. It remains to be seen whether a sufficient number of humans can break through the conceptual frameworks of current primitive human culture, in order to create new civilizations completely outside our current abominations. Terra Libra is such an attempt.

*Don't forget: Senator Feinstein packs and has armed bodyguards with "assault" weapons to protect her!

They want yours but they'll keep theirs.

Other Links