"Without Prejudice" UCC 1-207
Globalism/NWO is a war against the "Republic of the united States of America", the "Bill of Rights", the "US Constitution", "National Sovereignity" and your "Sovereign Rights".
"To SAVE the "Republic of the united States of America". To win any war you must know who the enemy is. I suggest you TERRORIST & TREASON WHO's WHO ?
"Time and again
in this century, the political map of the world was
transformed. And in each instance, a New World Order
came about through the advent of a new tyrant or the
outbreak of a bloody global war, or its end."
President George Bush - February, 1990
WHAT IS A 'CLEAR CHANNEL?' - SILENT SUBLIMINAL PRESENTATION SYSTEM
The subliminal presentation described here is inaudible i.e., high audio or ultrasonic frequencies, the affirmations are presented at a constant, high amplitude level, and they occupy their own "clear channel", non-masked frequency allocations.
Patents mentioned and of interest for those who want to understand the New World Order agenda: 3,951,134 - 4,395,600 - 4,616,261 - 4,686,605 - 4,777,529 - 5,017,143 - 5,027,208 - 5,128,765 - 5,134,484 - 5,159,703 - 5,170,381 - 5,175,571 - 5,194,008 - 5,215,468 - 5,221,962 - 5,224,864 - 5,245,666 - 5,270,800 - 5,644,363 - 6,017,302 and 6,122,322
Defense Minister official Gen. Leonid Ivashov was correct, in early 2002, in denouncing the new utopian "mini-nuke" scheme as a form of Malthusian warfare. Such madness has not been seen since Lord Bertrand Russell, at the close of World War II, called for the U.S.A. to use its monopoly on nuclear weapons to pre-emptively attack the Soviet Union and establish an Anglo-American-run world government.
Syndicated columnist Joseph Kraft, writing in Harper's in
July, 1958, said that records indicated that the Carnegie
trustees hoped to involve the U.S. in a world war to set
the stage for world government. Dodd said they wanted
"to bring the idea of 'one-world ( government ) ' to the
point where it is acceptable to the people of this
country. That is the primary aim, and everything that
has happened since then is a means to that one end."
Their memos indicated that they believed their efforts
were successful, because the war "had brought about a
change in the American psyche."
"The governing body of the UN's nuclear watchdog has
passed a resolution declaring the United States in
breach of UN safeguards. The issue has been sent to the
UN Security Council. The International Atomic Energy
Agency's ( IAEA ) 35-nation governing board said
Washington, DC was in "non-compliance." IAEA's
decision now gives the Security Council the power to
take steps against the United States, including economic
sanctions - UN Disarming America
THE FACTS THAT PUT THIS WHOLE MESS INTO PERSPECTIVE - Do you see a pattern? American Empire UN/NWO aggression.
Yugoslavia refused to join the European Union - they were attacked !
South Africa resisted the African Union - they were attacked !
Venezuela Resists the American Union - CIA/CFR started a Coup - they will be attacked !
NWO nice guys with power, money, the media, drugs, political
stooges and armies
UN/NWO Long Term Goals
o Destruction of Nation State Sovereignty.
o Destruction of Nation State Armies.
o Destruction of all Physical Money.
o Destruction of the individual right of self defense.
o Destruction of the individual property rights
o Destruction of US educational system
o Destruction of US Constitution.
o Establishment of one world tracking system for the population
o Establishment of one world Taxing Authority.
o Establishment of one world Military.
o Establishment of one world police state
o Establishment of one world Court System.
o Establishment of one world control over resources (water, minerals and oil)
o Establishment of one world digital currency
o Establishment of one world Religion.
(Is the WHO/UN/NWO behind it? Or is it a test of UN/NWO
Population Control? UN has said for years the earth is over
populated. But; If the banking system falls off the clift how do
you maintain control and power ?)
• CFR/NWO
WTC TO IRAQ -
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it
is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and
it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no
voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them
they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for
lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." —
Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials
after World War II. WTC TO IRAQ
• NO UN
•The foundation supporting the house of cards, lies, deceit, and fraud
• Fraud, Lies and Cover-ups by the Government - Questions need to be answered
• LOST OF YOUR FREEDOMS BY DEFACTO LAWS
WHY WON'T CONGRESS OR YOUR GOVERNMENT ANSWER
SIMPLE QUESTIONS? - THINK ABOUT IT?
"Tuesday, April 1st marked the end of the fourth week Rose
Lear of Muskegon, Michigan has gone without food in an
attempt to force the U.S. Government to answer hundreds
of specific legal questions about U.S. income tax laws."
“To secure Peace and eliminate the people’s fear of
Government, to secure the First Amendment Rights of the
people to confront their government by non-violent means,
to secure all that America was to hold as sacred, I will risk
and give my life.” Rose Lear
Former U.S. attorney-general Ramsey Clark Why
Does Bush Push to Silence Free Speech?
Patriot II
"Without judicial oversight, there is simply no assurance
that the Attorney General is using this authority in keeping with
democratic principles and constitutional rights,"
Who trained, supplied and financed the al-Qaida? The evidence against the US is is damming.
Consider a time line on "International Terrorism"
o Early 1970s - CFR ( some radical elements ) develop the "International Terrorism" as a "Global Enemy" thesis. This is to make the NWO the saviour for a world boiling in "International Terrorism".
o circa 1976 - The Muslims are chosen to carry the "International Terrorism" tourch.
o circa 1977 - The move to destabilize Afghanistan is made. The CIA implements the first moves in the destabilization of Afghanistan.
o 1979 - President Carter signs "Operation Cyclone" which has as its objective the destabilization of the USSR by fomenting Muslim Terrorism. Up to 20 Billion US dollars are pumped into this project over the next few years. Another 20 - 40 Billion are pumped in via the Saudi and drug channels, with our approval.
o USSR responds by moving into Afghanistan.
o CIA organizes al-Qaida.
o CIA organizes the Pakistan Secret Intelligence agency to help train al-Qaida.
o CIA trains ( often in the US ) , equipes, transports and deploys al-Qaida.
o CIA utilizes al-Qaida to train, equip and fight for, the
Bosnian Muslims, the KLA and others in the Yugoslavia
theater.
Now before the Senate Judiciary Committee is Chairman Orrin G. Hatch's proposal to repeal the sunset provisions in the USA Patriot Act, which gave law enforcement vast new powers after the 9/11 attacks. The Utah Republican is breaking faith with his colleagues who, because haste seemed judicious, agreed to the act with minimal debate and despite serious misgivings.
The 300-page law included some overdue reforms that brought this nation's surveillance laws into the 21st century, making it easier, for example, for federal agents to tap a suspect's cell phones in addition to his or her home and business lines.
But the act also granted the government broad new
powers in criminal investigations, often involving suspects
with no connection to terrorism. This represents a
dramatic shift in the balance of U.S. law away from
individual civil liberties. Agents can now search an
individual's home without his knowledge or consent and
demand that librarians and booksellers tell them what
books a person has borrowed or bought. The government
can more easily detain individuals, hold them for a longer
time without charging them and more easily deport
noncitizens.
"They
resort to stealth and deception only when they're doing
something they're ashamed of, such as creating pork
barrel projects, lining their pockets with another
congressional pay raise -- and spawning more police state
powers. "
"Simply put, this legislation would destroy some of the legal
protections that make America different from totalitarian
states like Cuba, North Korea, Iran and Iraq. For example,
Patriot II would allow the government to arrest and detain
people in secret, paving the way for the midnight knock on
the door that terrorizes the population in police states. "
interesting views
President Bush Sr. proudly spoke of "The New World
Order," a term used by those who promote one-world
government under the United Nations. In going to war in
1991, he sought and received UN authority to push Iraqi
forces out of Kuwait. He forcefully stated that this UN
authority was adequate, and that although a
congressional resolution was acceptable, it was entirely
unnecessary and he would proceed regardless. At that
time there was no discussion regarding a congressional
declaration of war. Rep. Ron Paul, MD
Date: Wed Jun 18 2003 10:38 ConspiracyTheory (great article) ID#342269: Copyright © 2002 ConspiracyTheory/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved
How stupid do they think we are? 17.06.2003 [08:12]
Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997
Book - It Is "A Blueprint for World Dictatorship," Says a
Former German Defense and NATO Official Who Warned of
Global Domination in 1984, in an Exclusive Interview With
FTW by Michael C. Ruppert Summary "THE GRAND
CHESSBOARD - American Primacy And It's Geostrategic
Imperatives," Zbigniew Brzezinski, Basic Books, 1997.
These are the very first words in the book: "Ever since
the continents started interacting politically, some five
hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world
power."- p. xiii.?Eurasia is all of the territory east of
Germany and Poland, stretching all the way through
Russia and China to the Pacific Ocean. It includes the
Middle East and most of the Indian subcontinent. The key
to controlling Eurasia, says Brzezinski, is controlling the
Central Asian Republics. And the key to controlling the
Central Asian republics is Uzbekistan. Thus, it comes as no
surprise that Uzbekistan was forcefully mentioned by
President George W. Bush in his address to a joint session
of Congress, just days after the attacks of September 11,
as the very first place that the U.S. military would be
deployed... As FTW has documented in previous stories,
major deployments of U.S. and British forces had taken
place before the attacks. And the U.S. Army and the CIA
had been active in Uzbekistan for several years. There is
now evidence that what the world is witnessing is a cold
and calculated war plan - at least four years in the
making - and that, from reading Brzezinski's own words
about Pearl Harbor, the World Trade Center attacks were
just the trigger needed to set the final conquest in
motion. FTW, November 7, 2001, 1200 PST ( Revised Jan.
21,2001 ) - There's a quote often attributed to Allen Dulles
after it was noted that the final 1964 report of the
Warren Commission on the assassination of JFK
contained dramatic inconsistencies. Those inconsistencies,
in effect, disproved the Commission's own final
conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone on
November 22, 1963. Dulles, a career spy, Wall Street
lawyer, the CIA director whom JFK had fired after the
1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco - and the Warren Commission
member who took charge of the investigation and final
report - is reported to have said, "The American people
don't read." Some Americans do read. So do Europeans
and Asians and Africans and Latin Americans. World
events since the attacks of September 11, 2001 have not
only been predicted, but also planned, orchestrated and -
as their architects would like to believe - controlled. The
current Central Asian war is not a response to terrorism,
nor is it a reaction to Islamic fundamentalism. It is in fact,
in the words of one of the most powerful men on the
planet, the beginning of a final conflict before total world
domination by the United States leads to the dissolution of
all national governments. This, says Council on Foreign
Relations ( CFR ) member and former Carter National
Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, will lead to nation
states being incorporated into a new world order,
controlled solely by economic interests as dictated by
banks, corporations and ruling elites concerned with the
maintenance ( by manipulation and war ) of their power.
As a means of intimidation for the unenlightened reader
who happens upon this frightening plan - the plan of the
CFR - Brzezinski offers the alternative of a world in
chaos unless the U.S. controls the planet by whatever
means are necessary and likely to succeed. This position
is corroborated by Dr. Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D. a former
German defense ministry official and advisor to former
NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner. On November 6,
he told FTW, "The interests behind the Bush
Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission
- founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller - and the
Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now
moving to implement open world dictatorship within the
next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists.
They are fighting against citizens." Brzezinski's own
words - laid against the current official line that the
United States is waging a war to end terrorism - are
self-incriminating. In an ongoing series of articles, FTW
has consistently established that the U.S. government had
foreknowledge of the World Trade Center attacks and
chose not to stop them because it needed to secure
public approval for a war that is now in progress. It is a
war, as described by Vice President Dick Cheney, "that
may not end in our lifetimes." What that means is that it
will not end until all armed groups, anywhere in the
world, which possess the political, economic or military
ability to resist the imposition of this dictatorship, have
been destroyed. These are the "terrorists" the U.S. now
fights in Afghanistan and plans to soon fight all over the
globe. Before exposing Brzezinski ( and those he
represents ) with his own words, or hearing more from
Dr. Koeppl, it is worthwhile to take a look at Brzezinski's
background. According to his resume Brzezinski, holding a
1953 Ph.D. from Harvard, lists the following
achievements: Counselor, Center for Strategic and
International Studies Professor of American Foreign
Policy, Johns Hopkins University National Security Advisor
to President Jimmy Carter ( 1977-81 ) Trustee and
founder of the Trilateral Commission International advisor
of several major US/Global corporations Associate of
Henry Kissinger Under Ronald Reagan - member of
NSC-Defense Department Commission on Integrated
Long-Term Strategy Under Ronald Reagan - member of
the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board Past
member, Board of Directors, The Council on Foreign
Relations 1988 - Co-chairman of the Bush National
Security Advisory Task Force. Brzezinski is also a past
attendee and presenter at several conferences of the
Bilderberger group - a non-partisan affiliation of the
wealthiest and most powerful families and corporations
on the planet. The Grand Chessboard Brzezinski sets the
tone for his strategy by describing Russia and China as
the two most important countries - almost but not quite
superpowers - whose interests that might threaten the
U.S. in Central Asia. Of the two, Brzezinski considers
Russia to be the more serious threat. Both nations border
Central Asia. In a lesser context he describes the Ukraine,
Azerbaijan, Iran and Kazakhstan as essential "lesser"
nations that must be managed by the U.S. as buffers or
counterweights to Russian and Chinese moves to control
the oil, gas and minerals of the Central Asian Republics (
Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan ) .
He also notes, quite clearly ( p. 53 ) that any nation that
might become predominant in Central Asia would directly
threaten the current U.S. control of oil resources in the
Persian Gulf. In reading the book it becomes clear why
the U.S. had a direct motive for the looting of some $300
billion in Russian assets during the 1990s, destabilizing
Russia's currency ( 1998 ) and ensuring that a weakened
Russia would have to look westward?to Europe for
economic and political survival, rather than southward to
Central Asia. A dependent Russia would lack the military,
economic and political clout to exert influence in the
region and this weakening of Russia would explain why
Russian President Vladimir Putin has been such a willing
ally of U.S. efforts to date. ( See FTW Vol. IV, No. 1 - March
31, 2001 ) An examination of selected quotes from "The
Grand Chessboard," in the context of current events
reveals the darker agenda behind military operations that
were planned long before September 11th, 2001. "...The
last decade of the twentieth century has witnessed a
tectonic shift in world affairs. For the first time ever, a
non-Eurasian power has emerged not only as a key
arbiter of Eurasian power relations but also as the
world's paramount power. The defeat and collapse of the
Soviet Union was the final step in the rapid ascendance of
a Western Hemisphere power, the United States, as the
sole and, indeed, the first truly global power... ( p. xiii )
"... But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian
challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and
thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a
comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is
therefore the purpose of this book. ( p. xiv ) "The attitude
of the American public toward the external projection of
American power has been much more ambivalent. The
public supported America's engagement in World War II
largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese
attack on Pearl Harbor. ( pp 24-5 ) "For America, the chief
geopolitical prize is Eurasia... Now a non-Eurasian power
is preeminent in Eurasia - and America's global primacy is
directly dependent on how long and how effectively its
preponderance on the Eurasian continent is sustained. (
p.30 ) "America's withdrawal from the world or because
of the sudden emergence of a successful rival - would
produce massive international instability. It would prompt
global anarchy." ( p. 30 ) "In that context, how America
'manages' Eurasia is critical. Eurasia is the globe's largest
continent and is geopolitically axial. A power that
dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three
most advanced and economically productive regions. A
mere glance at the map also suggests that control over
Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's
subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and
Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central
continent. About 75 per cent of the world's people live in
Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there
as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil.
Eurasia accounts for 60 per cent of the world's GNP and
about three-fourths of the world's known energy
resources." ( p.31 ) It is also a fact that America is too
democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits
the use of America's power, especially its capacity for
military intimidation. Never before has a populist
democracy attained international supremacy. But the
pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular
passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or
challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being.
The economic self-denial ( that is, defense spending ) and
the human sacrifice ( casualties, even among professional
soldiers ) required in the effort are uncongenial to
democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial
mobilization." ( p.35 ) "Two basic steps are thus required:
first, to identify the geostrategically dynamic Eurasian
states that have the power to cause a potentially
important shift in the international distribution of power
and to decipher the central external goals of their
respective political elites and the likely consequences of
their seeking to attain them;... second, to formulate
specific U.S. policies to offset, co-opt, and/or control the
above..."? ( p. 40 ) "...To put it in a terminology that
harkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires,
the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are
to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence
among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and
protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming
together." ( p.40 ) "Henceforth, the United States may
have to determine how to cope with regional coalitions
that seek to push America out of Eurasia, thereby
threatening America's status as a global power." ( p.55 )
"Uzbekistan, nationally the most vital and the most
populous of the central Asian states, represents the
major obstacle to any renewed Russian control over the
region. Its independence is critical to the survival of the
other Central Asian states, and it is the least vulnerable
to Russian pressures." ( p. 121 ) Referring to an area he
calls the "Eurasian Balkans" and a 1997 map in which he
has circled the exact location of the current conflict -
describing it as the central region of pending conflict for
world dominance - Brzezinski writes: "Moreover, they
[the Central Asian Republics] are of importance from the
standpoint of security and historical ambitions to at least
three of their most immediate and more powerful
neighbors, namely Russia, Turkey and Iran, with China
also signaling an increasing political interest in the region.
But the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as
a potential economic prize: an enormous concentration of
natural gas and oil reserves is located in the region, in
addition to important minerals, including gold." ( p.124 )
[Emphasis added] "The world's energy consumption is
bound to vastly increase over the next two or three
decades. Estimates by the U.S. Department of energy
anticipate that world demand will rise by more than 50
percent between 1993 and 2015, with the most
significant increase in consumption occurring in the Far
East. The momentum of Asia's economic development is
already generating massive pressures for the exploration
and exploitation of new sources of energy and the
Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known
to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf
those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea." (
p.125 ) "Uzbekistan is, in fact, the prime candidate for
regional leadership in Central Asia." ( p.130 ) "Once
pipelines to the area have been developed,
Turkmenistan's truly vast natural gas reserves augur a
prosperous future for the country's people. ( p.132 ) "In
fact, an Islamic revival - already abetted from the
outside not only by Iran but also by Saudi Arabia - is
likely to become the mobilizing impulse for the
increasingly pervasive new nationalisms, determined to
oppose any reintegration under Russian - and hence
infidel - control." ( p. 133 ) . "For Pakistan, the primary
interest is to gain Geostrategic depth through political
influence in Afghanistan - and to deny to Iran the
exercise of such influence in Afghanistan and Tajikistan -
and to benefit eventually from any pipeline construction
linking Central Asia with the Arabian Sea."? ( p.139 )
"Turkmenistan... has been actively exploring the
construction of a new pipeline through Afghanistan and
Pakistan to the Arabian Sea..." ( p.145 ) "It follows that
America's primary interest is to help ensure that no
single power comes to control this geopolitical space and
that the global community has unhindered financial and
economic access to it." ( p148 ) "China's growing
economic presence in the region and its political stake in
the area's independence are also congruent with
America's interests." ( p.149 ) "America is now the only
global superpower, and Eurasia is the globe's central
arena. Hence, what happens to the distribution of power
on the Eurasian continent will be of decisive importance
to America's global primacy and to America's historical
legacy."? ( p.194 ) "Without sustained and directed
American involvement, before long the forces of global
disorder could come to dominate the world scene. And
the possibility of such a fragmentation is inherent in the
geopolitical tensions not only of today's Eurasia but of the
world more generally." ( p.194 ) "With warning signs on
the horizon across Europe and Asia, any successful
American policy must focus on Eurasia as a whole and be
guided by a Geostrategic design." ( p.197 ) "That puts a
premium on maneuver and manipulation in order to
prevent the emergence of a hostile coalition that could
eventually seek to challenge America's primacy..." ( p.
198 ) "The most immediate task is to make certain that
no state or combination of states gains the capacity to
expel the United States from Eurasia or even to diminish
significantly its decisive arbitration role." ( p. 198 ) "In
the long run, global politics are bound to become
increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of
hegemonic power in the hands of a single state. Hence,
America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly
global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very
last." ( p.209 ) "Moreover, as America becomes an
increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more
difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues,
except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely
perceived direct external threat." ( p.211 ) [Emphasis
added] The Horror - And Comments From Someone Who
Worked With Brzezinski Brzezinski's book is sublimely
arrogant. While singing the praises of the IMF and the
World Bank, which have economically terrorized nations
on every continent, and while totally ignoring the
worldwide terrorist actions of the U.S. government that
have led to genocide; cluster bombings of civilian
populations from Kosovo, to Laos, to Iraq, to Afghanistan;
the development and battlefield use of both biological and
chemical agents such as Sarin gas; and the financial rape
of entire cultures, it would leave the reader believing that
such actions are for the good of mankind. While seconded
from the German defense ministry to NATO in the late
1970s, Dr. Johannes Koeppl traveled to Washington on
more than one occasion. He also met with Brzezinski in
the White House on more than one occasion. His other
Washington contacts included Steve Larabee from the
CFR, John J. McCloy, former CIA Director, economist
Milton Friedman, and officials from Carter's Office of
Management and Budget. He is the first person I have
ever interviewed who has made a direct presentation at
a Bilderberger conference and he has also made
numerous presentations to sub-groups of the Trilateral
Commission. That was before he spoke out against them.
His fall was rapid after he realized that Brzezinski was
part of a group intending to impose a world dictatorship.
"In 1983/4 I warned of a take-over of world
governments being orchestrated by these people. There
was an obvious plan to subvert true democracies and
selected leaders were not being chosen based upon
character but upon their loyalty to an economic system
run by the elites and dedicated to preserving their power.
"All we have now are pseudo-democracies." Koeppl
recalls meeting U.S. Congressman Larry McDonald in
Nuremburg in the early 80s. McDonald, who was then
contemplating a run for the Presidency, was a severe
critic of these elites. He was killed in the Russian
shootdown of Korean Air flight 007 in 1985. Koeppl
believes that it might have been an assassination. Over
the years many writers have made these allegations
about 007 and the fact that someone with Koeppl's
credentials believes that an entire plane full of
passengers would be destroyed to eliminate one man
offers a chilling opinion of the value placed on human life
by the powers that be. In 1983, Koeppl warned, through
Op-Ed pieces published in NEWSWEEK and elsewhere, that
Brzezinski and the CFR were part of an effort to impose a
global dictatorship. His fall from grace was swift. "It was
a criminal society that I was dealing with. It was not
possible to publish anymore in the so-called respected
publications. My 30 year career in politics ended. "The
people of the western world have been trained to be
good consumers; to focus on money, sports cars, beauty,
consumer goods. They have not been trained to look for
character in people. Therefore what we need is education
for politicians, a form of training that instills in them a
higher sense of ethics than service to money. There is no
training now for world leaders. This is a shame because
of the responsibility that leaders hold to benefit all
mankind rather than to blindly pursue destructive paths.
"We also need education for citizens to be more efficient
in their democracies, in addition to education for
politicians that will create a new network of elites based
upon character and social intelligence." Koeppl, who
wrote his 1989 doctoral thesis on NATO management, also
authored a 1989 book - largely ignored because of its
controversial revelations - entitled "The Most Important
Secrets in the World." He maintains a German language
web site at www.antaris.com and he can be reached by
email at jbk@antaris.com. As to the present conflict
Koeppl expressed the gravest concerns, "This is more
than a war against terrorism. This is a war against the
citizens of all countries. The current elites are creating so
much fear that people don't know how to respond. But
they must remember. This is a move to implement a
world dictatorship within the next five years. There may
not be another chance." Koeppl Article
short cut links to some of my other pages