Spy Game (2001)
Grade: C-
Cast: Robert Redford, Brad Pitt, Catherine McCormack
Director: Tony Scott
Rated R for language and violence
The Last Castle (2001)
Grade: C
Cast: Robert Redford, James Gandolfini, Mark Ruffalo, Steve Burton, Delroy
Lindo
Director: Rod Lurie
Rated R for language and violence
Wow. 2001 sure sucked for Robert Redford.
The aging star, at 65, has attempted to make a comeback in the cited year
with the insanely boring "Spy Game" and the amiably obvious "The Last
Castle". Both films were below-par action flicks that prove Robert Redford
has the Peter Pan syndrome—he doesn’t want to get older. He tries to appear
young and tough in these films, but it’s awkward because…well, mainly
because we know he’s 65-year-old Robert Redford. But even the greatest (and
most age-appropriate) of actors couldn’t have saved these sloppy messes—"Spy
Game" alone got my money’s worth out of the clock above my TV, and "The Last
Castle" ALMOST but not quite had me groaning in a way I hadn’t since the
disgustingly patriotic "Men of Honor". Not quite, though—it wasn’t that
bad.
"Spy Game" revolves around Nathan Muir (Redford), soon retiring from the
CIA, who gets caught in the middle of an inane movie when his skilled
trainee Tom Bishop (Brad Pitt) is arrested for espionage in China, and will
be put to death in mere hours. The film consists of non-stop action and
excitement. Right…uh-huh. There’s more action in McDonalds’ drive-thru
order lane.
Actually, what the film consists of are flashbacks to the days when Muir was
training Bishop, and we don’t get much of anything to get excited about—the
flashbacks aren’t eventful, and the only reason we even remotely care about
Bishop’s fate is because he’s played by Brad Pitt. And by that criteria
alone, his character’s sympathy is walking a fine line.
"Spy Game", at 126 minutes, is both too long and too briskly paced; it is
too boring to have such a long running time, so I was bored, and it is too
quick because of the hyper, seizure-inducing editing by Christian Wagner.
This is MTV music video stuff, or Jerry Bruckheimer stuff. I suppose that’s
appropriate, though—Bruckheimer produced "Enemy of the State", which is
directed by "Spy Game"’s Tony Scott. Scott probably learned some stuff from
Bruckheimer and carried it over to this film. I’m not sure a real filmmaker
would follow Bruckheimer’s advice, and that statement holds up, since "Spy
Game" proves Scott isn’t a real filmmaker.
There are some nice moments. I liked the scene where Bishop was practicing
some of his techniques (“I want to see you on that balcony in two minutes”).
If the film was that much fun through the whole thing, this might not be a
negative review. Also, some of the cinematography was cool, and as much as
I loathed the editing, there were parts of the movie where it worked.
All of these redeeming factors fail to redeem. "Spy Game" is a slow, dull
slog through clichés and visions of Brad Pitt being tortured before, half a
second later, we cut to Robert Redford talking to hotshot CIAers. So much,
over these 126 minutes, happens, but we feel very strangely at the end of
"Spy Game" because it seems as if nothing has. It reminds me of "Proof of
Life": so much promise in the premise, but so much disappointment in the
execution.
Slightly more watchable is "The Last Castle", directed by former film critic
Rod Lurie ("The Contender"). I just have to ask this: why would a guy that
used to be a film critic direct a film so filled with things critics hate?
Can he imagine himself putting this film in his 2001 top 10? If he
can…well, his credibility just went down the drain in my eyes. While
occasionally entertaining, "The Last Castle" is not a work to be proud of.
Redford (who is a little better here than in "Spy Game", I guess, but still
not 100% impressive) plays Eugene Irwin, a respected Lieutenant General, so
respected that I suspect there was even more prison sex than in "The
Shawshank Redemption", but Lurie didn’t want to film it. He is in jail
because of something that’s a secret, so I won’t tell you, but he’s under
the command of James Gandolfini’s Colonel Dick Winter (note: Dick is not his
name, but a description), who is as corrupt as anyone this side of "The
Green Mile". The two don’t get along very well, and soon Irwin is plotting
to take over the prison, as Winter is allowing the murder of inmates. The
dumbest logic in the film comes from Irwin’s rebelliousness—yes, what Winter
is doing is wrong, but he’s the boss. Taking over the prison is a good way
to join that list of murdered inmates. Why not try to report him again?
All of this is quite enjoyable, and there are good performances from
Gandolfini and Mark Ruffalo ("You Can Count On Me"), but something about it
seems tired and routine. We’ve seen it all before, and "The Last Castle"
doesn’t seem to understand that. The least it could do is come up with a
clever or innovative way to present its story, but everything on the screen
has been used in one way or another in other films. If you ever want a
perfect encyclopedia of clichés, "The Last Castle" will work wonderfully.
It saves itself by being somewhat likable. I was watching all of this, not
worrying about how it would turn out, but wondering how it was going to be
handled. I suppose that’s a good thing. But the best movies challenge us,
and this one does anything but. Well, actually, some of the best films are
just extremely entertaining, but this doesn’t excel in that area either,
only mildly so. Some virtues save it from being terrible, but nothing keeps
it from mediocrity. It’s too knowingly patriotic and “perfect” for it to
rise above its average demeanor.
So, in conclusion, I have a message for Robert Redford, if he is reading
this…
Mr. Redford: Congratulations on churning out crap and releasing it into
cinemas rather than flushing it down the toilet. Yes, I disliked "Spy Game"
and "The Last Castle". If you want a real comeback, do the following: a
low-budget drama (not big budget actioner) in which you act your age and
stop trying to be pretty. It might work. These two certainly didn’t.
-Alex, July 2002