version 030227
When a friendly surgeon asked if I had a retirement hobby, the answer was:
" To model the three dimensional features of the universe".
Oh yes. Two dimensions of space, called x and y planes, can be seen nightly from my backyard and I understand so little about galactic distances, I am kept busy inventing the z plane.
Ah but nobody, including me, has to believe these constructions. My models are hypothetical structures to stimulate thought and argument, since pictures are worth whole dictionaries of words.
Stereoscopic space modeling is an art form, and comes with a disclaimer that the 3D pictures presented must not be used for space-ship navigation.
Astronomy has always been based on mythology. My faith comes from a T shirt statement: 'The Big Bang is an Exploding Myth'. However, the 3D models are based on 2D clues, such as dark objects blocking the light from glowing gas must be in front of the glow.
None. These are all major navigational hazards. The beauty of glowing gas is produced by ultraviolet and X-rays so intense they will never be tourist resorts for live humans. They are more interesting to Radiologists than Surgeons.
Some, like planetary nebulae and supernova remnants are certainly of interest to Geriatricians. The biggest clouds are Obstetrical wards where new stars are born. Fetal stars come from dark gas and dust, sometimes in clouds shaped like smoke stacks or gas pillars. They are hidden from human vision but detected by infra-red rays that penetrate the dust. Infant stars, often clustered in Paediatric wards, have blown way the unused gas (which impresses Gastro-enterologists) and that is how they emerge into visibility. Giant baby stars often blow up prematurely as supernovae, and are a challenge to Neonatologists. Medium and smaller stars radiate excess energy as teenagers to become adult, stable stars on the main sequence. The adult phase lasts a very long time and an unknown number of stable stars, like the sun, foster life forms on planets, becoming interesting to General Practitioners.
The nebula models are miniatures of my original stereoscopic cards, suitable for a Holmes Stereoscope. You could print them out. But the originals have 320dpi resolution on 5x7 inch cards, while these are pathetically small, compressed files which print poorly.
Not at present, because I do not have rights to the astronomical images the models are based on. The people of NOAO/AURA/NSF, the Hubble Space Telescope and I have yet to negotiate a deal. However, NOAO, through Kathy Coil, has given me permission for stereoscopic versions on the internet, but not if published any other way.
You have three choices: make better models
yourself,
Viewing of parallel stereo pairs on a computer
screen is easily done with a Pokescope, if free stereoscopic viewing is
beyond you. This is all described, with many alternative methods for
computer stereo at:
Not for most of them. (February 2003: the rosette nebula is now available as an anaglyph and the tarantula nebula as a reduced size stereo card)
Star z planes might be improved using Hyparchos and Tycho data. However, most of the star distances near nebulae are recorded as "unknown" in these big catalogues and improved accuracy currently seems an impossible project for an amateur. |
Rosette Nebula, a large gas cloud near the
ecliptic and visible in the summer sky from New Zealand.
Mz3 Ant Nebula in the Southern Constellation of Norma.
HII region in M33, a galaxy of the local cluster.
30 Doradus Star Cluster, Tarantula nebula.
NGC6782 Galaxy |
Big Bang Microwave Image.
Published by NASA February 2003.
This stereoscopic version by John Wattie is an art form of no scientific merit.It makes no difference if you use X stereo or U stereo viewing, since the 3d effect is as arbitrary as the colours.
The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) took 12 months to slowly scan the whole sky. Slight differences in temperature were mapped in colour and reveal clumping of matter caused by acoustic oscillations shortly after the Big Bang. The age of the universe can now be computed as 13.7 billion years with an accuracy of 1%.
"Well suck me up with a drainage catheter," exclaimed the surgeon. "The amount of faith required to believe this must be about the same magnitude as the faith needed for any other myth I ever heard of, but the picture of ancient stars is nice."
Astrophysicists are currently the high priests of creation theories and the populace are in awe of their pronouncements. However, the theoretical physicists are not hearing voices out of burning bushes and they do not promise hell fire if we disbelieve them. The evidence for their unbelievable theory that the Universe came from nothing at all by means of a huge explosion is consistent with some versions of their mathematics. Even though the details change every year, any scientist may challenge it, if he can. It is just a pity that relativity theory is incompatible with quantum theory and yet both are mixed in to explain the big bang, along with "inflation" that nobody can explain to ordinary humans. Thank goodness "string theory" has become less fashionable, for that was even more obscure than many of the big bang components.
"The Universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." J.B.S.Haldane