The Truth About the Chinook Crash of June'94

Article last updated 27/02/05
It is of course impossible to avoid noticing that the Princess of Wales has disappeared whilst the powers that be are continuing to devise various evasive explanations for an accident that would certainly have been avoided if one intelligence report had not been misconstrued at the behest of paedophiles or paedophile sympathisers in the Suffolk establishment, as well as of course numerous time servers, flatterers, blackamilers and hangers on.   The precise role of her erstwhile Husband Charles Windsor and his family in that particular incident are perhaps not quite clear and one cannot help but wonder if suspicions about this former accident are anything to do with the fact that French authorities continue 'acting deaf' as far as precise details of her demise are concerned.

Now I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill though this might seems difficult with such a large molehill as certain of these events unquestionably seem to represent but I did happen to say forcefully three or four days beofre he died that the individual who was identified by the BBC report in to his death as the Chief Constable of the RUC, and turned out to be another Kevin 'ought to be careful of travelling,' and the fact of the matter is that in the decade or so since then they have simply refused to discuss that matter or any other of the matters connected with my personal suit. This had obviously arisen in some manner from the context of familial/legal/political problems related to the fact of my being technically an Englishman but of having mostly Irish relatives and a mostly Irish family background by virtue of the fact that my father had only one sibling who neglected to reproduce; though the extent of my personal relations with anyone is rather exaggerated by the use of the word family insofar as my life has been an endless nauseating nightmare of misled white collar workers, teachers, education officials, social workers and policemen throughout the miserable years of my wretched existence. I have been continually asserting throughout my entire life that I have been treated with illegal disrespect as a citizen by a local Solicitor (and other officials obviously) who deliberately bungled the presentation of an adequate and much deserved and long overdue defence of my person that was not based on a hostile impersonation! Insofar as I have always felt it necessary for the powers that be to confess that they have misunderstood relevant facts and abused my civil rights consistently whilst also misreading badly some very serious matters they ought to have been abreast of, the matter is not therefore without litigious/financial ramifications as part of a personal quest for justice and I can only really add that I never offered to negotiate for any of the civil rights described.

In saying 'thereby hangs a tale,' or, 'that's a long story,' I am obviously stating the patently obvious, but suffice it to say for example in the short term that among the interesting facts about the background to the fact of my having consistently over many years told the Suffolk Police that they had badly misconstrued a lot of input related to the legal facts of the down and out existence I had been living arguably since 1970 was the fact that even as I questioned Sergeant Huggins at Ipswich Station some few days before the expedition he was planning went splat that I couldn't help but feel prompted by a flash of insight to make the curiously unconnected statement that I did. I had recently then in the early summer of 1994 sought to reiterate this by means of a practical joke of sorts which saw me constrained to a mental hospital (for a period of time as yet to be fraudulently decided on by the County Council's arbitrary clerkship) in the month before the crash which was dominated by Newspaper headlines about an intense period of IRA activity. It would be difficult under any sort of circumstance to avoid pointing out that my Guardian during my Schoolyears was my disgruntled (overtly?)ultraliberal Father who along with all his relatives have lied about their saboteurial intent once he had lost his second professional post in 1974 and sought to conceal various circumstances associated with the fact of him having divorced my (southern irish) Mother in 1971: there are obviously a lot of interesting and perhaps relevant circumstances especially for those with a specific interest in any of the obviously more relevant subject areas.

Perhaps before asking anyone to consider that the Police in Sleepy Suffolk County England are entirely guilty of not preventing this expensive disaster (or any other such tall story with obviously not the least shred of truth or credibility about it) and that they obviously should have taken more seriously the remark that their colleague the now deceased Chief Constable Kevin Macnamara of the Royal Ulster Constabulary could have used a highly specific additional warning about being wary of the dangers of travelling some 72 hours prior to this epic journey, which has occasioned an extremely unusual measure of hopelessly contrary conjecture since it's dismal culmination; I should ask interested parties or even the merely curious whether it is or is not true, that the 'incident' of the ignominious destruction of the entirety of the senior echelon of British Intelligence in Ireland some 10 years ago now, has formed the basis for a number of startling and entirely contradictory claims ranging from assertions that the Mark 2 Chinook was the best serviced machine in the world to allegations that it had a troubled service history, and that the pilots were to blame for the crash resulting from 'gross negligence' or something such.

Just as such ludicrous suspicions ought not to arouse the slightest interest they are really not in the least bit likely to elicit even a raised eyebrow among the disgraced families of the blamed pilots and their colleagues who doubtless will not have had these accusations brought to their attention despite the fact that they should obviously form part of any honest enquiry into the business. Unquestionably neither has the apparent fact that the principal reason that this author of such evidently fictitious nonsense was ignored was in fact principally because Officers and other establishment figures were overlooking cases of inventive bookkeeping and worse (as I say) for friends and along with other colleagues had sought to blacken this author's good name. Not only that but had actually gone so far as to have committed him to a mental institution on a verifiably fictitious basis. Various concerns which have been all too shockingly vindicated remain described as 'paranoid' on all official documents that I am aware of. The same mental institution, St Clements Hospital that had been persuaded to cook up a ludicrous insulting and largely fake diagnosis within weeks was attracting the interest of national newsmedia as the result of gruesome murders committed by an outpatient who, was not considered 'a danger,'and has been slammed several times since as 'unsanitary' by the, (typically) toothless watchdogs after the equally toothless and useless, black hearted MP and his scheming Wife had mulcted the business for all the publicity they could via their friends at the East Anglian Daily Times, whilst doing little worthwhile for anyone and binning or ignoring letters from this highly distressed party: which may or may not have had something to do with her concerns for his reputation with regard to allegations of giving alcohol to under age people, getting them involved with drug users and even arguably inciting them to commit terrorist atrocities. Whatever the truth about the background to these matters it remains true that nothing has been done to address any of them and that as far as I am aware the Labour Government is planning to try and ignore them though this desire may be subject to some gradual erosion as more people realise what has actually happened.

The fact that Jamie Cann MP died on October 15th 2001, ambition having led him to an early death from Liver failure is of no consolation whatever in this respect: whilst any excuse for retiring both Mr and Mrs Cann was increasingly obviously an end which justified the means, he had achieved nothing for me and was ignored by any Policemen who may or may not have noted letters he wrote about my case. The whole business is so blandly indicative of the fact that we live in a society where deceit and duplicity are practised by and expected of everyone except perhaps the odd religious crank that it is enough to make One want to tear ones' hair out in sheer frustration. See Death of Jamie Cann MP

Doubtless also the families of the dearly departed would find it impossible to believe that the (ex) Chief Constable's Anglo-Irish namesake is doing anything other than spinning a tall tale, perhaps in order to swindle some government department of enough money to repair his badly scarred kneecap, or rebuild his disgusting NHS dentistry and repair some of the deliberately botched operations carried out by practitioners vengeful at the mention of free things for anyone; or for re-education to help him understand how he was detained for a fortnight between the 9th and the 17th of March that year as official records continue to assert amongst many other things. Perhaps that might also help him fathom why his warnings that the dead Officer and his colleagues 'should be careful of travelling,' remains officially described as, 'paranoid.'

Doubtless also it isn't in the least bit of interest to citizens of the Nation involved with the Military and their families such as the 15 year old boy from London who was blinded recently and had his arm blown off by a booby trapped torch left in a Territorial Army centre (AD 2001) to know that their superiors have taken such steps as arbitrary confiscations of personal documents and deliberate alienation of theoretically sympathetic persons in the most outrageous manner as a means of safeguarding their interests; how many people I wonder are aware that the British Army is not only currently undergoing investigation from their own Police Force for collusion with paramilitary groups in assassinations but has actually raided at least one Police 'safe house' within the last ten years to destroy incriminating evidence ! It is widely believed that this has led to some serious thumb sucking amongst 'phony Tony Blairs' cronies who are all obviously desperate to avoid a Job at the Northern Ireland Office!

News coverage of the latest House of Lords Enquiry into the disaster will have done nothing to distract the observant reader from suspicions that the matter is being considered with a less than thoroughly conscientious self examination on the part of the various 'authorities' in question as the simple number of deceased is apparently a matter of some dispute among the various media covering the political fallout from the event. The number originally reported was 31 members of a team from different branches of the Services including two RAF pilots and headed by Chief Constable Kevin Macnamara of the RUC whom, according to the Times in their coverage of this most recent investigation, which was much less keen to savage the posthumous reputations of the Pilots, took no part at all in an expedition consisting of 25. I daresay this comes as something of a surprise to Mrs Macnamara and her fatherless children who have, I'm quite sure, been missing their Father since about the time of the accident... Ah well, what's an odd corpse or two eh ? Or even half a dozen, or more for that matter!

The recent sacking of Sergeant Timothy Avery for drink driving whilst on duty cuts no ice with me as regards the public image of the local force; as a matter of fact it wouldn't surprise me if this happened whilst his colleagues were considering explanations as to why they deliberately left Chief Constable Macnamara running an obviously dangerous gauntlet of persons with some obviously justified grudges against the UK Constabulary: perhaps they have simply gone too far in manufacturing the increased likelihood of a Terrorist threat by leaving these injustices to fester. Also recent has been the disciplinary hearing of Dez Thompson of the Suffolk Police force who claimed to have been fired at with a Gun from a vehicle he was pursuing and has since, apparently confided that it was not true. Well perhaps he might be excessively concerned about this terrorist threat, as indeed he should, especially at a time when some number of his colleagues have betrayed their all too allegedly treasonous doings; either that or he has perhaps been taking too many hallucinogenic drugs like the Prime Minister or has been playing too many computer games or both.

On the subject of vision, strange sights and accidents! It has not escaped the attention many of those locally who have been appalled to hear such stories in circulation, that one of two characters of the sort as are often described as Neo-Nazis and had been on trial for the murder of a down and out Perry Mason and his pet dog in St Lawrence's Churchyard in 1992 and had been controversially acquitted in '93, bears a strong resemblance to myself excepting that I am much more slight of build and lack tattoos: it so happens to be the case that both this innocent unfortunate and his canine companion had sustained many dozens of stab wounds during the course of their assassination. In the wake of their controversial acquittal at that time I had made the complaint to the now deceased MP that those members of the Judiciary who managed the case had obviously acquitted my voice and deliberately ignored the accused insofar as I was mixed up with some strange scenes at the local College as the case was being heard and it was not a matter to which I had paid any attention at all insofar as I had set out to avoid Politicians whilst seeking to compose myseof for a course of academic study, until I bumped into the these individuals around Town separately but within days and have presumed that they were persuaded by a small number of wannabee right wing Tory College Lecturers and suchlike that the Town was up in arms at the antics of the Labour Council and the fact that eg the local West Indian subculture which they had patronised all too carelessly was obviously a glaring failure in terms of presenting the place as a desirable place for worthwhile and creative individuals to live in. I can only suggest that the arrest of of the requisite judicial figures for contempt and for joining the murder conspiracy they were officially investigating is long overdue. It is difficult to avoid a surmisal that if such a suggestion had been effected or the judicial figures had behaved within legal limits the Town would have endured many less curious fatal accidents than it has done quite recently. This is particularly true in view of the fact that the local Police Force are still musing over the Karen Hales murder which was quite obviously committed by another of the local down and outs in a fit of outrage at the inability of the local Labour establishment to obtain the conviction if that's the reality behind these controversial judicial proceedings: I believe that the Investigating detectives and myself have concluded that the culprit was a heroin addict who has since died. Equally seriously is a matter which has obviously deeply undermined the confidence of the local force, whose performance in the more recent Vicky Hall Murder trial (and others) it is difficult to avoid noting would have disgraced a backward ten year old insofar as they spent millions of pounds just to hear one forensic expert contradict another. The Population in the East of the County are braced for spiralling rates of violent crime as the Suffolk force contemplate the staggering depth of the appalling mistakes they have become significantly responsible for, including possibly the fact that they have sustained many criminals and blackmailers on the basis of being nominally Windsorian and that this is strikingly responsible for much of the all too well evidenced confusion and paranoia surroundingnot just these trials but also on the part of the late Princess, this having obviously contributed strikingly to the collection of unfortunate coincedences which led to her demise, in particular the allegation that she had taken an interest in the Perry Mason murder and what is furthermore of the allegation that the haste of Henri Paul reflects the actions of the Judges who acquitted two locally infamous Neo-Nazis having masqueraded an innocent voice as the larger of the two disturbed individuals before the Jury and assorted media which if you take it as a deliberate act must have been bustled through somewhere. Many things could be fairly said about this unfortunate incident which would be at least half true, that at first sight are apparently contradictory: none of the allegations made have been investigated at all as far as I am aware! I suppose it has to be said insofar as the 'troubles' were a subject of conversation between myself and one of my Irish Cousins whom I met in the flesh for the first time on a visit paid for by my Mother in the previous year ('93) during which my Uncle unfortunately behaved indecently, that I was being forced to concede that I would have to agree with the assertion that the Chief Constable in question had been involved in the assassination of citizens of the Irish Republic who were simply trying to make use of the power of free speech in opposing British jurisdiction in Ulster or that he had at least turned a blind eye to such unsavoury acts as the slaying of Journalists which certain of his colleagues must have been involved in if more recent revelations about provincial government are to be believed which it seems they must to a significant degree. I should add however that this was rather a statement about law and order and the realities of society today than it was at least at the time a comment on some particular incident or an attemtp to delve into the question of the Irish troubles, insofar as I'm sure such things occur on both sides of the border and in many other places in comparatively civilised Europe. The thought that it might be possible to badly misconstrue the realities of law and order in modern society is well instanced by such films as 'Serpico' about a New York Cop in the 1970s who was left paralysed having been beaten up by fellow Officers who didn't want or didn't feel able to join his moral crusade against official hypocrisy on things like the vice trade which it seems a fair conclusion is in fact managed behind the scenes by law enforcement agencies more often than not in most western nations.

See CV: Life History and main body for some further discussion of this incident!