[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PROTEL EDA USERS]: Hello
hmm... well i'll see tomorrow. i've got a CUPL-generated jedec that i'm
gonna try and burn then. i have noticed problems with different burners.
i was somewhat shocked to see a different fuse map check sum produced
from one version of abel to another. evidently the burnder was sensitive
to it also... the file checksum was valid so i was able to override the
burner
and force a burn which did indeed ring out correct.
protel documentation on the CUPL language and the PLD-burning process
appears to be somewhat sparse.
miker
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Stout [SMTP:jstout@ncon.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 5:33 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list proteledausers
> Subject: Re: [PROTEL EDA USERS]: Hello
>
> I could never the get schematic entry to PLD to work. However,
> I've found the CUPL compiler works well for me. I've used 22V10's,
> and isp2032's, and a few Cypress parts. My only problem has
> been matching up my needs (modest), Protel's capabilities (broad),
> and the device programmer my company has (Needham EMP-20,
> rather limited in some ways).
>
> Good Luck,
> Jeff Stout
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robison Michael R CNIN <Robison_M@crane.navy.mil>
> To: Multiple recipients of list proteledausers
> <proteledausers@techservinc.com>
> Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [PROTEL EDA USERS]: Hello
>
>
> >hi phan,
> >
> >can you extrapolate a bit on your PLD comments about Protel? are we
> >talking about the CUPL language and producing jedec files here? cuz
> >i'm getting ready to attempt to burn a pal using a jedec i produced with
> >the CUPL, and it'd be nice to know about any bugs in it.
> >
> >thank you, miker
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Le, Phan [SMTP:PLe@ALPHA.CA]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 1:09 PM
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list proteledausers
> >> Subject: RE: [PROTEL EDA USERS]: Hello
> >>
> >> Hi Minh,
> >>
> >> Do you need PLD feature? If yes, Protel may not be a good choice.
> >> Protel is very new in this area so don't expect too much yet. Maybe
> >> future
> >> release
> >> will iron out the early stage bugs.
> >>
> >> Other modules (Sch, PCB) are very good.
> >> I haven't use SI & mixed signal circuit simulation to give comments on.
> >>
> >> Phan
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: HIEN-MINH HUYNH [mailto:mhuynh1999@hotmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 08:59
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list proteledausers
> >> Subject: [PROTEL EDA USERS]: Hello
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello everybody, I am new to the group - just joined in yesterday. I've
> >> been
> >>
> >> using Orcad for a while at my old job. I just got a new job and my boss
> >> ask
> >> me to look for an EDA. So, I am thinking about buying the Protel 99SE -
> >> lucky me, I found out about your discussion group.
> >> Could you please tell me what are the main differences between Orcad
> and
> >>
> >> Protel ? I see that if I buy the Protel 99SE for about 6K then it can
> do
> >> almost every thing that ( Orcad Capture + Orcad Layout + Orcad PSpice )
> >> and
> >> they will cost over 10K !!! Do you think so ?
> >> I am asking for your help to make the decision - I am really
> appreciate
> >>
> >> about that. Thanks
> >> Regards
> >> Minh Huynh
> >>
> >>
> >>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> >> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com.
> >>
> >> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> >> http://profiles.msn.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
