Aether-Wave Computer Modelling!
...
Dr. Jay!
thanks for getting back to me! Am looking forward
to your simulation!! [I don't suppose you write
software for the MacIntosh??]
Sorry if you thought I was being simplistic in
my description of the mathematics of nature.! I
was being complete -- to show nature in a thousand
times more detail than covert physics. A thousand
times, and more, detail than 'Quantum Physics'!
That is -- there are no 'photons'!
[There are NO photon particles! And no POINT
particles or charges! No points in nature!]
[There are, of course, quantized energy transfers
in nature. But no photon particles, and points in
motion, or in existence!!]
the electron is eight times larger in radius
than the proton! It is a volume, a vortex,
of aenertia, motion, wave action. But not
'waves' in the sense of points plotting a curve --
instead, a continuum field of experience. A continuum
gradient of electric and magnetic experiences!
Read the "Undiscovered Phyics" if you like!
It is easy to read -- for anyone who reads
English, and has a little bit of physics background.
for that matter, most of it is comprehensible to
people who only have rundimentary English capabilities,
and much of it -- to the people of the world with
no English-language ability. That is why it is
published as illustrations!
If you look at the proof of metric relativity --
you will find out what 'charge' is, and energy
and mass -- and that they are NOT fundamental
concepts ...
The math is trivial -- as is ALL math in nature.
I didn't spend thirty years studying this for
nothing. [Ten years doing nothing else!]
The equation is a sine function. Easy.
And you know what a helicoid is, a spiral,
which propagates ... as a screw ...
We are describing electromagnetic waves, from nature,
not from institutional physics. Not from institutional
math. That math does not apply in nature!
As there are no points, no straight lines, etc.
in nature.
Again, if you need an equation to PLOT the printing
of the helicoidal aether waves and lightwaves
(and the EM volumes which are electrons and proton),
or to throw a beam of electrons against the
screen of your computer, it is a sine function,
as described in my previous letter to you.
i.e., just write out equations for the
x, y and z as sinusoidal functions of time ...
that is, write out the equation for plotting
a circle, in the XY plane, with the point
or plotter moving around the circumference
of the circle as a function of time.
x = sin(t); y = cos(t); [t = time]
if plotted this way, then it appears as a
circle, a one-loop lissajous figure, on the
surface of the computer screen.
change it to x = sin(t), y = 0, z = cos(t)
and you see it as a two dimensional circle
sideways, as a line!
change it to y = a sin(t), z = b cos(t), and
x = c t -- and you have the helicoid, propagating
away off the side of your computer screen !!
(or top, if you let y = c t.)
[a, b and c are constants which you can
select to vary the ellipsoidal properties
in both the lateral (electric vector) direction,
and the longitudinal (magnetic vector) direction.]
By switching x and y, you get the helicoid
propagating upward, rather than sideways. [Later
we can add a constant function of t to x,y or z
in order to veer the helicoid off at different
angles with respect to the viewer.
[as in y = t/d + {a sin(t)}; z = t/e + {b cos(t)};
and x = t/f +{c t} ... with d, e and f being
additional constants.]
Thanks again for making me review this!!
[I am sure you will see if I made any
mistakes here ...]
It is six years or so since I was looking at how
to plot nature (SIMPLE NATURE) on the computer
screen with algebra! [Addition, multiplication,
subtraction and addition are the ONLY functions
which take place in nature!!]
Best regards! And looking forward to your
participation in building our X49 scramjet
engines, and predecessor bench-top rocket
engine, if that interests you.
For Mother Sun, Moon, and Milky Way!
Millennium Twain
...
now in our 22nd day of global fasting
for world peace ...
riseup/www/info/ worldfast
...
satyagraha -- fasting protest ...
Gandhi named this concept of action: "satyagraha"
(combining the Hindu words for "truth"
and "holding firmly.")
************ ********* ********* *
************ ********* ********* ******
Computer Algorithms to Plot Aether-Wave Topology of Creation !!!
Wednesday April 30, 2003 11:38 am
...
dr Jay et al!
still trying to track down some software on the
web -- to do what you offered to do from scratch --
re: create a pc/mac algorithm for plotting the
electromagnetic aether foundation of experience!
displaying the waveforms of the 'unseen' helix
waves, which create the 'seen' quantized waves,
and the standing waves we know as matter (electrons,
protons, neutrons, atoms, molecules).
creating images of Lissajous matter patterns
with more or less humps, wavelengths, N mumbers.
N=1 is a loop, N=2 is infinity figure, etc.
these Lissajous figures are the variable standing-
wave topologies of the electron!
in my first 'guestimate' as to how the sinefunction
would be structured to plot the propagating, open-ended,
aether waves and lightwave, I suggested:
[as in y = T/d + {a sin(T)}; z = T/e + {b cos(T)};
and x = T/f +{c T} ... with d, e and f being
additional constants.]
now it occurs to me that the constants a, b, and c
modify only the amplitude. you will want to also
insert constants or variables in front of each T in
the sine functions .. i.e.,
[y = t/d + {a sin(jT)}; z = t/e + {b cos(kT)};
and x = t/f +{c T}]
that way, for the nonquantized aether waves,
and the quantized lightwaves, propagating in
open-ended coils ... you can demonstate that
when j=k (or perhaps j=nk) ... integer multiples
of the two transverse frequencies ... you have
a coupling condition which preserves the
amplitude and wavelength of the lightwave ...
when this harmonic coupling does NOT exist ...
then you have the MORE plentiful aether waves ...
which unravel (redshift) as they screw their
way along ..
____________ _________ _________ ______
____________ _________ _________ ______
as to the Electron wave structure ... we
just have to plot the Lissajous curves ...
which are, I believe,
[y = {a sin(jT)}; z = {b cos(kT)};
and x = {c sin(jT)]
that is, not only are we generating a
trigonometric circle -- but the circle
has a sine hump generated in it --
[see attached 3hump ELECTRON jpg]
____________ _________ _________ ______
____________ _________ _________ ______
in the case of a proton, we have to
go two steps further! [The proton
is a superposition, nonlinear, of
three waveforms, not two (as is the
electron).
we have to generate a ring-slinky.
a slinky which is coiled around -- mouth
to tail -- and reconnected into a torus
with a large (spin) radius, and a small
('twist') radius.
definitely NOT as simple as an electron with
137 little humps, going around one big hump!
as the the 137 humps in the proton have
to not only move up and down, in the +/-
X axis for example -- they also have to move
IN-AND-OUT -- in the Z axis.
so I assume we will need:
[y = {a sin(jT)}; x = {c sin(jT);
and z = {b cos(kT) + b' cos(137kT)}] !!!
in other words, as the large z component
[b cos(kT)] varies once around the spin axis,
the minor z component b' cos(137kT) varies
137 times!
Not exactly 137! But you will know where
to get the number! [Inverse of Fine Structure
Constant!]
____________ _________ _________ ______
Looks like we are closing in on it!!
Anyone out there have a lead on downloading
some good Lissajous-within- a-Lissajous plotting
software for the Apple? !!
WE ARE ARRIVING!!!
Millennium Twain
now in our 25th day of global fasting
for world peace ...
riseup/www/info/ worldfast
...
satyagraha -- fasting protest ...
Gandhi named this concept of action: "satyagraha"
(combining the Hindu words for "truth"
and "holding firmly.")
You can read my discussion of the work
of my colleague Philip Kanarev on pages
39-41 of New Study In Scarlet. We worked
together for years. His is the best
discussion of above-ground hydrogen
spectra ... but does not have a model
of the electron and proton detailed
enough to go into the sub-ground states
of the hydrogen/neutron -- which I
call a hydron and Randy Mills calls a
hydrino. Kanarev doesn't explore the
aether wave and experiential fundamentals
from which mass and energy and charge,
and time and distance, all metrics, are
derived.
You can see a better model of the neutron
from Thomas G. Barnes on pages 43-47. See
Paramahamsa Tewari's neutron model on pp.
47-48, and his proton model on page 68.
Tewari's model has little merit to it,
also ignoring the fundamentals.
You will also want to read Milo Wolff,
Olof Sunden, Walter Cassani, Chris Illert,
Donald Reed and Horst Preussker referenced
there. And review Preussker's "Whirlring"
proton model.
And of course, review Randy Mills book.
He doesn't have a model of the hydrogen/
neutron, nor look at the fundamentals,
but he does have a good discussion of
sub-ground spectral frequency expectations.
As you will see from the current dialog
in the NuclearStructure discussion group
I am now taking the structural analysis
of hydrogen and the neutron a few steps
forward and focusing on the specific
harmononic frequencies within the component
electron and proton, and their shared
spectrum as well.
I am hoping you will forward summaries
of your electrolysis and Brown's gas
work to the NuclearStructure group.
We are setting up a shop, and will
focus on hydrogen and electrolysis
there, here in Ojai California. The
lab, a new mini-exploratorium, has
been named ElectroVersity.
For our whole world of culture,
for all our sacred relations,
Millennium Twain
--- in free_energy, Rein Reinkort