What
follows is an
exchange of e-mail with an advocate of Eternal Torment.
Audio
mp3
Aaron
has asked that I
include the following link supporting eternal punishment for those who
might be
interested. An
Advocate of Eternal Punishment
www.reformed.org/eschaton/pink_eternal_punishment.html
For those interested in hearing the Good News, I have also provided a
link
about universal restoration from my
site. Universal
Restoration
http://www.angelfire.com/dc/universalism/SiteLinks.html
Aaron starts the discussion.
Date: Wed, 02 Jul :39:
Dear Dean,
I came across your web page this evening and I would like to ask you
a question. I hope that it will lead to some further discussion if you
have the
time. I noticed you certainly seem to have patience and an open mind
with a
humble sincere desire to know what the word of God actually teaches. I
will try
to have the same attitude in our discussions, but I will let you know
that I do
have some pretty strong convictions (Christian) so if that comes across
I don't
want you to think I am being arrogant or something. I am open minded to
hear
other peoples beliefs, and if I find myself to be in error, I will try
to be humble
and change.
In your web page, I think it is fair to
say that your main
concern is with salvation and whether or not every single person will
be saved
sooner or later or not. I realize then that you believe in salvation
and that
it has something to do with Jesus, but I am not certain of what you
mean when
you talk about salvation and I would like to clarify this from the
start. My question
is this: What is salvation and how is it that people are reconciled
(you use
that word often) to God? Please try to be specific (and as detailed as
you feel
necessary) in your answer so that I can understand where your coming
from.
I hope to hear from you
sometime soon. Thanks,
Aaron
Date: Wed, 02 Jul :05:
Aaron,
I don't consider myself to be
a great theologian. I have found that the more dogmatic I become the
more I
have to eat crow later in life. I too have strong convictions, but have
found
that I do better to let people discover truth for themselves. I trust
that God
will bring us all to the unity of the faith, and I rest in the peace
truth
provides. I am grateful for the opportunity to share my beliefs, but
prefer to
not argue about disputed matters. ( In essentials unity, In
non-essentials
liberty, In all things love.)
I believe that theological systems and even doctrinal creeds can often
be more
of a hindrance to the discovery of truth, and a source of carnal
divisions,
rather than a protection from error. For me, God is a loving Father,
and Jesus
is an elder Brother. Relationship and fellowship is what my faith is
all about.
I trust any discussion we may have will be done in love for each other,
and
with a sensitivity to the faith we share. It is better to throw a
millstone
around our necks than to offend a brother.Let our discussion be done to
the
Glory of God, and to elevate him within our lives.
You ask about Salvation. That's a big topic. I believe all creation was
made
subject to futility and awaits deliverance from the bondage of
corruption.
Salvation.
All is saved... it is finished. Through the cross...and resurrection,
there is
a new creation. It is complete and finished. God speaks of those things
that be
not as though they were... because His word will accomplish all that it
is sent
forth to do.
All is being saved. It is a process. God is at work within us to will
"and
to do" of His good pleasure. We may not yet see all thing made subject
to
Him, but we see Jesus. We are being changed from glory to
glory even by
the
Spirit of the Lord.
All will be saved. He is able to subdue all things to himself by the
same power
that raised Christ from the dead. He makes friends out of enemies, as
we once
were, because of the ignorance and alienation in our minds.
What is salvation? Deliverance, conversion, regeneration, union with
Christ...
justification, adoption, sanctification, the Christian life,
preservation,
perseverance, healing, glorification. We have all in Christ. And Christ
is all
and in all.
Christ is our salvation, our justification, our sanctification and our
glorification.
As to the extent of Salvation:
Romans 3:23-24 "All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
being
justified freely by his grace through the redemption
that is in Christ Jesus"
All who sinned are justified ( just as if they never sinned ), BY HIS
GRACE.
Romans
6:23 " The
wages of sin is death, but the FREE GIFT of God is Eternal life through
Jesus
Christ our Lord.
Romans
5:18 "the free
gift came upon all men to justification of ife."
Romans 8:30 "Moreover, ...whom he justified , them he also
glorified."
Glory is the manifestation of God. All justified. All to be Glorified
Romans 8:19 "All creation awaits the manifestation of the sons of
God"
8:20 " because the creation itself also shall be DELIVERED from the
bondage of corruption"
Salvation is for all creation. Praise to God ... We are included
....accepted
in the Beloved.
As to Reconciliation: It is through the cross of Christ. Man was
"alienated from God from the life of God through the ignorance that is
them, because of the ignorance that is in them.Ephesians 4:18
Sin and the consciousness of it became a source of alienation. Man hid
himself
from God. Jesus came to take away the sin of the world. He is the
propitiation
not for our sins only, but also for the sins of the whole world. 1 John
2:2
Now
we can "draw near
with a true heart, in full assurance of faith, having our hearts
sprinkled from
an evil ( guilty) conscience" Hebrews 10:22
Some see Reconciliation as pacifying an hateful and vindictive God. I
don't
necessarily see God as that bitter. I tend to view reconciliation in
the New
Testament as primarily dealing with man's alienation from God, rather
than
God's alienation from man.
However, having said that, I have no problem with some who focus on
reconciliation as 2 way – That is pacifying God's anger, and also
dealing with
man's anger toward God. This is reasonable as well.
But like I said, I have a hard time seeing God as so bitter as many
portray
Him. (i.e. punishing man in hell without end for no purpose but his
anger, and justice.) I see God as a loving Father, and I cannot picture
a
loving Father doing that to anyone. If we take the picture of Jesus'
death as
pacifying God's anger and justice, then it follows that the punishment
has been
paid. The propitiation was for the whole world, and any punishment is
now
the discipline a loving Father would show to his children.
I hope this encourages your fellowship with the Father and with His Son
as it
does me. May we draw near with a true heart by that one Spirit.
Yours in
Christ,
Dean
Johnson
Date: Thu, 03 Jul :15:
Dear Dean,
I'm not a theologian either, I'm just a stupid country boy (hehe).
Anyway I'm going to try to jump right into the important stuff. I read
your
letter very carefully and I think you presented a good smart argument,
but one
that is not grounded in the scriptures. I will try to explain why.
First of all
I want to be clear on a few things about the scriptures themselves.
The Bible is the word of God (I think you agree) "All Scripture is
given
by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for
correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may
be
perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." 2 Tim. 3:16-17 (one
of
many proof texts)
While it is possible to interpret the Bible (or even another person's
words) in
all different ways, that does not change what the right interpretation
is or
what that person is actually saying. "Knowing this first, that no
prophecy
of the Scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy
came not in
old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were
moved by
the Holy Ghost." 2 Peter 1:20-21
The Biblical way to interpret scripture is to compare "spiritual things
with spiritual" (1 Cor.2:12-13) and let God interpret for Himself what
He
has said using the whole counsel of His word. So there is a right way
to
interpret scripture, making any other ways wrong. Of course its a big
plus to
have the Holy Spirit indwelling us to enlighten the eyes of our
understanding
(I am not saying that any one Christian in this life knows everything
perfectly
although he must know the very basic fundamentals if he is to be saved).
Another thing to always keep in mind of course is context. I think you
know
what the results can be of taking someone's words out of context. We
have to
look at the immediate context (to get the whole idea of what a passage
is
teaching rather than isolating verses), the broader context (look at it
in
light of the whole book or epistle), and the whole context (does it
agree with
the rest of the scriptures as a whole) if we are serious about finding
the
correct interpretation. If we do this we will start to see many
apparent
contradictions disappearing and becoming clear as we learn more and
more of
God's word and we will also learn some things that the bible doesn't
specifically say at any one place, but that it most certainly teaches
(the
doctrine of the Trinity comes to mind)(I still have a long way to go in
my
learning).
Having said that, I will attempt to show what I believe the bible
actually says
and teaches about the subject we are discussing. I will start with some
of the
more important verses you use to support your belief.
Justification in Romans 3. You quoted vss. 23-24 (leaving out the
"for" at the beginning of vs. 23) and concluded "All who sinned
are justified". The context however, demands that justification is
limited
to those who believe. Paul is saying whether you are Jew or Gentile
makes no
difference because, no, the Jews haven't been able to keep the law that
was
given them, they teach it, but they do not do it themselves (Chapter.
2:17-29) and yes, the Gentiles are dirty rotten sinners as
well. so
Listen! ALL have sinned and fallen short(3:9-18,22,23). No one will be
justified by the works of the law before God (3:19-20), but it is
through faith
alone that any will be justified and only those who put their faith in
Jesus
will be justified (vss. 22,25,26-28,30;4:3-5,9,11,13). How is it that
we can be
made right with God by faith alone? Christ took the punishment for our
sins
upon Himself so that the penalty has been paid, and His righteousness
is set to
our account ("imputed" 4:11,20-5:2) WHEN we put our faith in Him.
When God looks at us he sees Christ's righteousness so that we don't
stand
condemned as we would. That is Grace!
Do not let vs. 23 confuse you. It is clear from the context that what
is being
said is not something like "all have sinned and all are being
justified", but rather, after he just finished stating that no one will
be
saved by the works of the law, he says here's how it is that someone's
justified: vs.22"...the righteousness of God [is now
manifested
(vs.21)] which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon ALL them
[both Jew
and Gentile] THAT BELIEVE [all have sinned {broken the law 1 JN 3:4}
whether
they are Jew or Gentile makes no difference]...being justified freely
[again,
this is speaking of "them that believe whether Jew or Gentile] by his
grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: whom God hath set
forth
to be a propitiation THROUGH FAITH in his blood, to declare his
righteousness
for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of
God; to
declare, I say at this time his righteousness: that he might be just,
and the
justifier of HIM WHICH BELIEVETH in Jesus." So vs. 23 (which I didn't
quote, but summarized) is simply echoing what he already said in vs. 9
"What then are we [Jews] better than they? No, in no wise: for we have
before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin..."
I hope you take the time to read it in its context carefully. I have
seen
already in my 19 years, people who died cursing God and I know that
they did
not ever put their faith in Jesus for salvation, so it would follow
that they
were not justified and that they will stand before God on the judgment
day as
guilty. However rather than going by what I've seen and by my
reasoning, lets
look at some of the broader context of the book of Romans since this
passage
does not prove in the immediate context that God does or does not plan
to bring
everyone to faith eventually and therefor be justified .
In Romans chapter 9 we read about the sovereignty of God. He does what
ever he
pleases. He is God and the creator of all things so we should not find
this
surprising. Before we go into Romans 9 we should note some things about
God.
God is perfect, Matthew 5:48. "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your
Father which is in heaven is perfect." God is unchangeable, Malachi
3:6.
"For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not
consumed." God is most wise, Romans 16:27. "To God only wise, be
glory through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen." God is most holy, Isaiah
6:3.
"And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of
hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory." Revelation 15:4. "Who
shall not fear thee, O Lord, and glorify thy name? for thou only art
holy: for
all nations shall come and worship before thee; for thy judgments are
made
manifest." God is most just, Deuteronomy 32:4. "He is the Rock, his
work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and
without
iniquity, just and right is he." God is most merciful and gracious,
long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, Exodus 34:6. "And
the
LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God,
merciful and
gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth." God is
all
these thing and more which I will not go into now. It is common for
Christians
today to focus on one attribute of God, especially on how he is loving.
Well
that is true, but it does not diminish a might from his other
attributes no
matter how hard we focus on one and forget about the others.
Having said all that take a look at Romans 9. I especially want to look
at vs.
10 and on, but I have been typing for way to long now (I am very slow
at
typing) so I will email you again soon Lord willing to continue. Thanks
for
your patience. Your new friend,
Aaron
P.S. I hope to look at your reference to Romans 5:18 in the future
since it
(used along with Rom. 6:23) seems to be the other foundation vs. for
your
belief. I also hope to go to several verses that teach that God never
intended
to save everyone and I hope to look at the bible's teaching on hell. I
will say
that these are not pleasant things though, but much of it is essential
to
evangelizing.
Date: Fri, 04 Jul :44:
Aaron,
I agree typing is hard work, but our
labour is not in vain in the Lord.
I enjoyed your thoughts and felt strongly in agreement with them. I too
hold
the Bible in the highest regard, recognizing that there is a right
interpretation.
The whole counsel of God is exactly why I eventually adopted universal
salvation. I found that certain all inclusive scriptures were ignored
in
evangelical circles. Religion usually becomes an exclusive club. (i.e..
If they
don't belong to our group then we feel justified in excluding
them....ie. the
Pharisees attitude) This seems to me the root of much that is bad about
man
made religion. I don't believe that this is the heart of God. ( Though
the
Pharisees could quote lots of Scripture to back them up.) God wants to
include
everyone... Most people want to exclude those who are different. It is
the
source of much division, and self righteousness even within the church,
and
much carnality.
There is a perspective, a framework, a world view that we
approach the
scriptures with that affects our final conclusions. Do we include
others or do
we exclude them. Do we see ourselves as different from others. Do we
see our
place in the church as the result of something we did or as the work of
God.
Was it our choice? Was it the will of men, or was it not of ourselves,
but by
grace we were saved. Was it our own faith or was it by the faith of the
Son of
God that we live our life. Is it our own or is it the gift of God? I
see all,
including the faith I have, as the gift of God. ( Not of myself ) This
is no
small distinction.
I bring this up because you emphasize that justification is for those
that
believe in Jesus. Of course I agree with this. However, the
only reason I
have faith is because of the faith of Jesus. God gives this faith to
whoever he
wills...when He wills... every man in his own order, at the right time.
In Adam
all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. (1 Corinthians
15:22, 23)
If we use our faith as the thing that makes us different from others,
then
maybe we should balance this with other scripture that teaches that
there is no
difference. All that we have is the gift of God. God has concluded us
all in
unbelief that he might have mercy upon all. ( Romans 11:32)
It is true that God justifies those who believe in Jesus, but he has
concluded
us all in unbelief. The only one who believed is Jesus, and it is only
his
faith inside us that makes us righteous. He is our righteousness.
It is no longer I who live, but the life I now live in the flesh I live
by the
faith of the son of God who loved me and gave himself for me on the
cross. (
Galatians 2:20) I died on that cross with Christ... and so
did all
mankind ( 2 Corinthians 5:14) And just as all died suffering the
penalty of
sin, even so in, by and through Christ shall all be made
alive.
In Adam all are made sinners...Even so in Christ shall all be made
righteous. Our faith or choice is not what makes us
righteous, but it is
the faith of Christ in us.
You mentioned Romans 5:18. Yes, Romans 5:12-20 is a popular
universalism text.
Many try to limit the extent of the righteousness and eternal life
described
within the passage by pointing to Verse 17.
It says they that "THEY WHICH RECEIVE abundance of grace and of the
gift
of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ." They say
whether man RECEIVES is what limits the extent of the salvation. The
problem
with this eisogesis is that "Receiving" does not limit the word ALL,
but rather ALL specifies who it is that receives. The ALL, must all
receive...every man in his own order, if every man who died in Adam is
going to
reign with eternal life in Christ.
Once again, do we look at the scripture as excluding people by what
they do, or
as including all because of what Christ did. Do we see with the faith
of
Christ, who came to be the Savior of the world , or do we see ourselves
as
righteous because WE receive the gift. It is a subtle distinction, but
one that
makes all the difference.
There are many scriptures that clearly suggest a universal salvation
even when
one believes in eternal torment. In fact many more than suggest eternal
torment. The question is how do we look at the scriptures. Do we
interpret the
seemingly universalist texts, with a settled understanding of eternal
torment
and limited salvation, OR do we attempt to understand the harsh texts
about the
punishments of God with an understanding of the ultimate plan and
universal
intention of God to save all mankind. (Ephesians 1:9-10, Colossians
1:20)
I have concluded that the second is a fairer exposition of the heart of
God
that does justice both to the holiness of God and his love.
I believe inclusiveness is a more Christ centered, God honoring true
understanding of the mind and intention of God, than to focus on man's
efforts
to exalt his own efforts and choices, and thereby justify the exclusion
of
others. I believe it is God's plan to reach out to all creation,...
every man
in his own order according to the plan of God... the clay does not say
to the
Potter "Why have you made me thus?"
God is working out his plan in his own time... He makes all things
beautiful in
His time.
There is a new creation. And He does make all things new.
Dean Johnson
>Date: Sat, 05 Jul :11:
Dean,
I want to address some
things from your last reply to me and then hopefully I will have time
to talk
about some things in Romans 9 (after that I hope to get to Romans
5:12-21).
First of all I want to quote one of your statements and then comment on
it
because I think it is important that I do. I hope you don't mind.
"There are many scriptures that clearly suggest a universal salvation
even
when one believes in eternal torment. In fact many more than suggest
eternal
torment. The question is how do we look at the scriptures. Do we
interpret the
seemingly universalist texts, with a settled understanding of eternal
torment
and limited salvation, OR do we attempt to understand the harsh texts
about the
punishments of God with an understanding of the ultimate plan and
universal
intention of God to save all mankind. (Ephesians 1:9-10, Colossians
1:20). I
have concluded that the second is a fairer exposition of the heart of
God that
does justice both to the holiness of God and his love.
I believe inclusiveness is a more Christ centered, God honoring true
understanding of the mind and intention of God, than to focus on man's
efforts
to exalt his own efforts and choices, and thereby justify the exclusion
of
others."
First of all I want to say that from where I stand, your second
sentence isn't
true, but I don't intend to go into that at this time. As far as
interpreting
the scriptures, when we use the whole counsel of God that means we take
everything into consideration. If the Bible says one thing and then
goes on to
say something that is in opposition to the first thing it is highly
unlikely
that we are properly interpreting what is being said. It is not for us
to
decide in such a case which thing we think is better and fairer of a
truth and
exalt it above the other, or ignore or totally do away with the other
"All
Scripture is given by inspiration of God..."). Rather, the problem most
likely is that we are not really taking into consideration the whole
counsel of
God and so there is something we are missing from the picture. God's
word does
not contradict itself. Are God's sovereignty and justice in some ways
set
against his mercy? Are we to decide (even maybe by using some
scripture) which
we think is more prominent and come to a conclusion? Or can it be
interpreted
in such a way that both are equally true and not one is diminished
from? The
last question of course is what we should seek to do by searching the
scriptures. On this point I will lastly say that you are right, we
should lay
aside all preconceived ideas when we are studying God's word.
Now I wish to clarify some things about what I was trying to say about
the
Romans 3 passage. first of all, I was trying to show you that it cannot
when
taken in context be properly used as a verse to prove that God did, is,
or
will, save every single individual. To conclude "all who sinned are
justified" is a wrong interpretation. I also tried to show that this
passage limits justification to those who believe. However as I already
said in
my last letter, that also does not prove that God does not plan to
eventually
bring everyone to faith and therefore justify them, but THIS passage
does not
teach that he does plan that, and THAT was my point. This passage
cannot be
used to support the view that God plans to save everybody (though he
does plan
to save some of both Jews and Gentiles). I would also like to stress
that
Jesus' death on the cross by itself, does not justify anyone (it will
actually
damn some to hell. see 1 Cor.11:27-32), but Christ "was raised again
for
our justification," (Rom. 4:25). (if Christ had not rose from the dead
our
faith would be in vain 1 Cor. 15:14) and it is at the moment we believe
that we
are declared just by him, because of him haven taken our sins and the
punishment for them upon himself on the cross and giving us his
righteousness.
So if it is possible to die without faith in Christ (and I believe it
is
possible for many) it is possible to die without being justified (just
a
thought).
As for where our faith comes from, I agree 100 percent that it is
entirely a
gift of God and that no one can boast before God. If we were left to
our own
choice we would still be dead in our trespasses and sins. If anyone
believes,
it is only because God removed their heart of stone and gave them a
heart of
flesh that is then, and only then, able to respond to the gospel (and
it does
so willingly) with faith which God gives. So it is God who chose (or
elected)
his people and not us who chose him. This is very humbling.
I also agree that we should not exclude anyone, but that we should take
the gospel
to the ends of the earth. That is part of loving our neighbor as our
self and
we are to go even farther than that and are to love our enemies. God on
the
other hand, is not a mere man. He is the creator of all
things and he can and does do many things the we can not nor should not
do. God
has certain rights that belong to him and that only he has. One thing I
can
think of is the fact that vengeance belongs to God.
"14 Bless them which persecute you: bless, and
curse not.
15 Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with
them that
weep.
16 Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not
high things,
but condescend to men of low estate. Be not wise in your own
conceits.
17 Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide
things honest in
the sight of all men.
18 If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live
peaceably with
all men.
19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but
rather give place
unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay,
saith the Lord.
20 Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he
thirst, give
him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his
head.
21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with
good."
Romans
12:14-21.
This is a perfect example of how Christians have certain duties that
God has
given them, while God has rights that no others have. Psalm 15 :3 says
"Our God is in the heavens; he does whatever he pleases." So what are
some of these things God pleases to do? Romans 9 is one place where he
tells us
some important things he does that have to do with us (we are finally
getting
to some of the broader context of the Romans 3 passage). In vss. 11-13
we read:
"11 (For the children being not yet born, neither
having done
any
good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might
stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)
12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the
younger.
13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau
have I
hated."
Here we see that God has elected people according to his own purpose.
Not only
did he elect people, but he elected specific people which he calls (by
the Holy
Spirit). not everyone is elect of God, and those who are, were not
elected
because they were any better in any way than the non elect. God
actually says
he hates Esau.
"14 What shall we say then? Is there
unrighteousness with God?
God
forbid.
15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom
I will have
mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of
him that runneth,
but of God that sheweth mercy."
The first thing many people are tempted to think when they read this is
that
God is at fault. "This is terrible! This does not fit God the way I
think
of him!" We should never think in such a way though. We have already
looked at some of the attributes of God in my last letter. This is that
same
God, and he does whatever he pleases, which is always within his
attributes.
"17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for
this same
purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee,
and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have
mercy, and whom he
will he hardeneth."
Here we see that God has mercy on some and hardens others (who he even
raises
up) in order to show his power to all the earth.
"19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet
find fault?
For
who hath resisted his will?
20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest
against God? Shall
the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me
thus?
21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the
same lump to
make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to
make his power
known, endured with much long-suffering the vessels of wrath fitted
to destruction:
23 And that he might make known the riches of his
glory on the
vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews
only, but also of
the Gentiles?
Why does God judge people who cannot resist his will? I cannot answer,
but I
know that there is no fault with God. God can do what he pleases with
what he
has made. He pleases to save some of his that he's made and destroy
others that
he's made. God is not obligated to save any, and it would have been
perfectly
just for him to send everyone to hell. His WRATH and power is made
known in
those VESSELS OF WRATH FITTED TO DESTRUCTION and he is thereby
glorified. The
riches of his glory is made known through the VESSELS OF MERCY that he
"afore prepared" (elected, predestined or foreordained) UNTO GLORY
and he is glorified. The vessels of mercy are all he has called of both
(here
it is again, an echo from chapter. 3) Jews and Gentiles. There are two
categories of men with two different destinations (elect and sons of
perdition). Only God knows for sure who they are.
"25 As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my
people,
which
were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved.
26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place
where it was said
unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the
children of the living God.
27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel,
Though the number of the
children of Israel
be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be
saved:
28 For he will finish the work, and cut it short in
righteousness:
because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth.
29 And as Esaias said before, Except the Lord of
Sabaoth had left
us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha."
Salvation is extended to the Gentiles (all the nations of the world)
who (until
Satan was bound by Christ, from deceiving them...MT. 12:29; MK. 3:27;
Rev.
20:1-3) were in darkness during the old testament when the Jews were
God's
people (not every individual Jew was saved though vs. 6-8). Now we see
only a
"remnant" of the Jews to be saved. God left a seed (see Gal. 3:6-18)
that God's people might not be destroyed.
"30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles,
which followed
not
after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the
righteousness which is of faith.
31 But Israel,
which followed after the law of righteousness, hath
not attained to the law of righteousness.
32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith,
but as it were
by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;
33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a
stumblingstone and
rock of offense: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be
ashamed."
Again, the Gentiles followed not after righteousness (in the OT), but
now they
have attained it by faith. Isreal sought righteousness through the law
(Paul
was addressing this in chapter 2 and 3), but works that are pleasing to
God
flow from saving faith which (faith) always comes first and it is never
the
works that justify, but it is through faith. Christ actually became a
stumblingstone to the Jews even though the law and the prophets all
testified
of him. This was not any accident, but was according to the will of
God. Now
here's the free offer of the Gospel: "whosoever believeth on him shall
not
be ashamed." The Gospel command (to believe) is offered to the whole
world
wherever it is preached, but it is only given to the elect
(who are throughout all the world) by the Holy Spirit to obey. The rest
of the
world will only stumble over Christ. You or I do not know who the elect
are and
we are commanded to love everyone and to evangelize the whole world,
God will
do the saving.
I will close this e-mail by pointing out that you took Romans 11:32
("For
God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon
all.") out of context. Paul is still speaking of the relationship
between
the Jews and God, and the Gentiles and God, during the New Testament. I
suggest
starting at chapter. 9 vs. 24 and reading carefully to the end of
chapter 11.
Next I hope to look at Romans 5:12-21, and eventually look at more vss.
throughout the bible that go along with what Romans 9 is saying. I hope
I
didn't write too much for one letter Thanks for reading!
Your
friend,
Aaron
Aaron,
I
appreciated your letter. I found myself in agreement with so much that
you have
written. We are not far apart. I agree that the Bible is consistent. If
the
Bible appears to say something that is in opposition to other passages
then we
probably misunderstand the scriptures. We cannot exalt certain
scriptures above
others. That is exactly why I rejected eternal torment to accept a
limited punishment.
It is is much more proper to understand Aionios ( often translated as
eternal )
in a more limited way when referring to punishment, as this is
linguistically
acceptable, than to try to reinterpret or perform theological
gymnastics to the
universalist texts. I prefer to let the scripture speak for themselves.
The
apparent contradictions disappear as truth is revealed. I refer you to
a page
on my web site for more on the linguistic use of aion and aionios:
http://www.angelfire.com/dc/universalism/Eternal_Punishment_Scripture_Reconsidered.html
I also appreciated your clarification on justification. You say it is
"because of him having taken our sins and the punishment on the
cross." Man is not justified on account of his faith,( that would be in
effect
a meritorious work ), but on account of the righteousness of the last
Adam
(Romans 5:12-19).
Our faith is not the means of justification, but the occasion of our
realization, or perhaps appropriation, or imputation of it. I said once
before,
We are saved, we are being saved, and we will be saved. It is the union
of man
with Christ that makes righteous and justifies ( Romans 5:19). Having
said
this, I would like to add that man's solidarity with the first Adam
existed
whether he chose it or not, and so also Christ did not ask permission
to be the
propitiation for the whole world. The unity of all mankind is an
accomplished
fact in the mind of God (Ephesians 1:10). He is the savior of all men,
especially of those that believe (1 Timothy 4:10). All mankind, Jew and
Gentile
has been made one body in Christ (Ephesians 2:15). A man's unbelief
will not
make void the faithfulness or work of God. I also agree with you that a
man can
die without faith in Christ, but would like to add that death is no
longer the
end or a victorious enemy. O death, where is your sting. Jesus has
abolished
death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel. Let
us not
let a defeated enemy hinder our faith in the efficacy of the cross to
save all
mankind.
With you I also agree that "we should take the gospel to the ends of
the
earth". it is the love of Christ that motivates us. I believe the
Gospel
is good news, not an ultimatum.( i.e.. Accept Jesus or suffer in hell
for all
eternity).
You mention that vengeance belongs to God. This is true. God expressed
his
choice, according to his plan. He is working out his plan, and some are
chosen
to be part of the church and some are chosen, and fitted for
destruction. Some
vessels for honor and some for dishonor. God is sovereign and does
whatever
pleases him to accomplish his own purposes for his pleasure. The pot
doesn't
talk back to the potter. This can seem harsh if it is not balanced with
the
ultimate plan of God. He has made known to us the "mystery of his will,
according to the good pleasure, which he purposed in himself, ....that
in the
dispensation of the fullness of times he might gather together in one
all
things in (by and through) Christ ( Ephesians 1:7,10 ).
One could say the end justifies the means. God is working all things
after the
counsel of his own will. All things will work together for the good of
those
who love God. Some are delivered over to Satan for the destruction of
the flesh
that the spirit may be saved. ( 1 Corinthians 5:5 ) .Others suffer loss
but are
saved , Yet so as by fire ( 1 Corinthians 3:15) There is a saying. "You
have to be cruel to be kind." Yes, God hated Esau. But let us not deny
God's higher purpose in it all. All creation was created for his
pleasure
(Revelation 4:11). God has no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but
he does
kill to make alive and wound to heal.(Ezekiel 33:11, and Deuteronomy
32:39). In
the ages to come he will shew the exceeding riches of His grace in His
kindness
toward us THROUGH Christ Jesus (Ephesians 2:7)
There is no contradiction, nor is there any need to be ashamed of the
Gospel.
God is love. Truth dispels the clouds of doubt. I pray you will add to
your
understanding of the absolute sovereignty and severity of God, the
absolute
love and mercy of the Father. The two go hand in hand. Mercy and truth
have met
together.... and mercy triumphs over judgment.
Dean Johnson
Dear Dean,
If there are those that Christ died to save who are still going to go
to hell,
than what is it that they are being saved from? If temporary punishment
in hell
is the most severe punishment for sin that the Bible teaches of, and
yet some
of those who Christ died to save are still going to suffer this
temporary
punishment, they are really not being saved at all. The bible teaches
us that
Christ died in the place of those he came to save and by doing so, he
"SECURED" salvation for them.
"...he entered once for all into the Holy Place, taking not the blood
of
goats and calves but his own blood, thus securing an eternal
redemption...Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that
those who
are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death
has
occurred which redeems them from the transgressions under the first
covenant." (Hebrews 9:12,15). If Christ died in our place, that means
he
took all of our sins AND THE PUNISHMENT for them upon himself. If
Christ took
the punishment for our sin upon himself in our stead, then there is no
more
punishment for our sins that we should have to suffer. "There is
therefore
now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus..." (Romans 8:1).
If
all are included in Christ, none would be going to hell even
temporarily.
The bible teaches that all those who God the Father predestined to be
saved,
and then Christ secured salvation for, will be brought to faith
(called) by the
working of the Holy Spirit, so that they will be justified, and
therefore not
be condemned, but glorified.
"29 For whom he did foreknow, he also did
predestinate to be
conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among
many
brethren.
30 Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also
called: and whom
he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also
glorified." (Romans 8:29-30).
All of God's elect must be brought to faith (and justified) in this
life and
not the next because of the very nature of faith (and because of the
nature of
what comes after this life which we will look at later).
"Now faith is the substance of THINGS HOPED FOR, the evidence of THINGS
NOT SEEN." (Hebrews 11:1) If we must see God to believe, it is no
longer
faith. "But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that
cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of
them that
diligently seek him." (Heb. 11:6) "...The just shall live by
faith" (Galatians 3:11)
If anyone dies without having put their faith in Christ, it is because
that
person was not one who God set his love upon from before the foundation
of the
world, and elected unto salvation. You mentioned 1 Corinthians 15, in
your last
letter and said "death is no longer the end or victorious enemy",
which is true for the church, but not for those who die in their sins.
"The sting of death is sin" because sin is what condemns people to
hell.
Paul mostly has the church in mind in this passage, but I don't have
time to go
into that now.
As for whether hell is eternal or not, I do not think we can judge from
the
character of God, because It would not be unjust for God, (who
exercises his sovereignty
in choosing), to send one person to hell forever, and to show his love
and
mercy to another by giving him eternal life through Christ. It is true
though,
that God, if he chose to do so, could save everyone through Christ
without
going outside of all of his attributes also. I do not doubt for a
moment that
God could do that if he wanted to, I just don't find it to be biblical,
and so
however appealing it may be, I must reject it unless it is biblical. So
we
cannot judge "philosophically" whether eternal damnation fits God's
character or not, but rather, we should look to the scriptures and see
what
they say about hell. If we have doubts as to whether hell is eternal or
not
because of what some people (who are probably modernists) tell us about
the word
"Aionios" (If that is in fact the word), we should search the
scriptures to see if there is anything else that might suggest or tell
us about
the duration of hell. If we think it is possible that the word Aionios
could
mean ages, but it is also possible that it could mean "eternal" (as
it is traditionally and usually understood to mean, even before the
very
literal KJV bible existed) then we should see if we can determine which
it is,
using the scriptures, knowing that it must mean one thing or the other.
having said that, lets look at some scripture that speaks about hell. I
hope
you will see that God does not intend to save people who are going to
hell,
that there is no getting out of hell for those who are in hell, and
that hell
is everlasting. Also, today is the day for salvation.
First of all, it is not merely called punishment, but as we have seen
in Romans
9 it is also called destruction. Now the word destruction its self
should tell
us something about what will happen to those who are going to hell, but
we can
also see that God says more of what his purpose is here. In vs. 22 we
see that
these particular vessels first of all, are "vessels of wrath", and
that they are "fitted to" or made by the potter (God) for the whole
purpose of, not merely punishment, but "destruction". This is so that
the "PURPOSE of God according to election might stand" that he does
this and it is all (both showing his wrath and power in this, and
showing his
mercy on the other vessels of honor he's made unto glory) for his own
glory.
There is no "higher purpose" of God here than his purpose that he's
declared to be his WHOLE purpose in this passage.
In Job 21:29-32 we see that the wicked are reserved for the day of
destruction.
"29 Have ye not asked them that go by the way? and
do ye not
know their tokens,
30 That the wicked is reserved to the day of
destruction? they
shall be brought forth to the day of wrath.
31 Who shall declare his way to his face? and who
shall repay him
what he hath done?
32 Yet shall he be brought to the grave, and shall
remain in the
tomb."
Since the Old Testament was written in Hebrew, the word(s) for "for
ever" would not be the Greek word Aionios. Psalm 9:3-8
"3
When mine enemies are turned back, they shall fall and PERISH at thy
[God's]
presence.
4 For thou hast maintained my right and my cause;
thou satest in
the throne judging right.
5 Thou hast rebuked the heathen, thou hast
DESTROYED the wicked,
thou hast PUT OUT THEIR NAME FOR EVER AND EVER.
6 O thou enemy, DESTRUCTIONS are come to a
PERPETUAL END: and thou
hast DESTROYED cities; THEIR MEMORIAL IS PERISHED WITH THEM.
7 But the LORD shall endure for ever: he hath
prepared his throne
for judgment.
8 And he shall judge the world in righteousness, he
shall minister
judgment to the people in uprightness."
Psalm 73:18-19 "18 Surely thou didst set them in
slippery
places: thou castedst them down into DESTRUCTION.
19 How are they brought into DESOLATION, as in a
moment! they are
UTTERLY CONSUMED WITH TERRORS."
God's elect are redeemed from destruction. Psalm 103:2-4
"2
Bless the LORD, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits:
3 Who forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth
all thy diseases;
4 Who REDEEMETH THY LIFE FROM DESTRUCTION; who
crowneth thee with
lovingkindness and tender mercies..."
The rest of mankind is not. Proverbs 1:25-28 "25
But ye have
set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof:
26 I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock
when your fear
cometh;
27 When your fear cometh as DESOLATION, and your
DESTRUCTION cometh
as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you.
28 Then shall they call upon me, but I WILL NOT
ANSWER; they shall
seek me early, but THEY SHALL NOT FIND ME..."
"Perish" is another word that implies permanence. God does not wish
to save everyone. 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12 "10 And
with all
deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that PERISH; because they
received
not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 AND FOR THIS CAUSE GOD SHALL SEND THEM STRONG
DELUSION, THAT
THEY SHOULD BELIEVE A LIE:
12 THAT THEY ALL MIGHT BE DAMNED WHO
BELIEVED NOT THE TRUTH,
but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
Romans 1:26 "For this cause GOD GAVE THEM UP UNTO VILE AFFECTIONS..."
Matthew 7:13-14 "13 Enter ye in at the strait gate:
for wide
is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to DESTRUCTION, and
many there
be which go in thereat:
14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the
way, which leadeth
unto life, and few there be that find it."
Salvation is given to the elect only. Philippians 1:28-29
"28
...in nothing terrified by your adversaries: which is to them an
evident token
of PERDITION, but to you of salvation, and that of God.
29 For UNTO YOU IT IS GIVEN in the behalf of
Christ, not only to
believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake..."
Psalm 69:27-28 "27 Add iniquity unto their
iniquity: and LET
THEM NOT COME INTO THY RIGHTEOUSNESS.
28 Let them be blotted out of the book of the
living, and not be
written with the righteous."
To not come into God's righteousness, is to not have Christ's
righteousness
imputed to you, and therefore to not be justified or glorified.
Jeremiah 18:23 "23 Yet, LORD, thou knowest all
their counsel
against me to slay me: FORGIVE NOT THEIR INIQUITY, NEITHER BLOT OUT
THEIR SIN
FROM THY SIGHT, but let them be overthrown before thee; deal thus with
them in
the time of thine anger."
Matthew 12:31-32 "31 Wherefore I say unto you, All
manner of
sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against
the
Holy Ghost SHALL NOT BE FORGIVEN unto men.
32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of
man, it shall
be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it
shall not be
forgiven him, neither in this world, NEITHER IN THE WORLD TO COME." It
is
impossible for the elect to go against the Holy Ghost when he is
calling them
to faith and repentance (brining them to salvation). God will keep his
elect
from committing this sin by the power of the Holy Spirit who will give
them a
heart of flesh instead of stone.
Psalm 37:27-29 "27 Depart from evil, and do good;
and dwell
for evermore.
28 For the LORD loveth judgment, and forsaketh not
his saints; they
are preserved for ever: but THE SEED OF THE WICKED SHALL BE CUT OFF.
29 The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell
therein for
ever.
The promised land is for those who God has made righteous to inherit,
not the
wicked, who have not been made righteous.
When Jesus comes again, he will receive his bride, the church, (those
who are
saved) into heaven, but the rest will be permanently shut out. Matthew
25:10-13
"...the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to
the
marriage: and THE DOOR WAS SHUT.
11 Afterward came also the other virgins, saying,
LORD, LORD, OPEN
TO US.
12 But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you,
I KNOW YOU NOT.
13 Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor
the hour
wherein the Son of man cometh.
1 Thessalonians 5:1-11 "1 But of the times and the
seasons,
brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.
2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the
Lord so cometh
as a thief in the night.
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then
sudden
DESTRUCTION cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and
THEY
SHALL NOT ESCAPE.
4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that
day should
overtake you as a thief.
5 Ye are all the children of light, and the
children of the day: we
are not of the night, nor of darkness.
6 Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let
us watch and be
sober.
7 For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they
that be drunken
are drunken in the night.
8 But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting
on the
breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation.
9 For GOD HATH NOT APPOINTED US TO WRATH, BUT TO
OBTAIN SALVATION
by our Lord Jesus Christ,
10 Who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep,
we should live
together with him.
11 Wherefore comfort yourselves together, and edify
one another,
even as also ye do."
The fact that God will repay and punish some people shows that
Christ
didn't pay for their sins in their place. Otherwise God would be unjust
in
doing so. He will destroy them FROM his presence and FROM his power
that worked
faith in us.
2 Thessalonians 1:3-12 "3 We are bound to thank God
always for
you, brethren, as it is meet, because that your faith groweth
exceedingly, and
the charity of every one of you all toward each other aboundeth;
4 So that we ourselves glory in you in the churches
of God for your
patience and faith in all your persecutions and tribulations that ye
endure:
5 Which is a manifest token of the righteous
judgment of God, that
ye may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which ye also
suffer:
6 Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to
RECOMPENSE tribulation
to them that trouble you;
7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when
the Lord Jesus
shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
8 In flaming fire taking VENGEANCE on them that
know not God, and
that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
9 Who shall be PUNISHED WITH EVERLASTING
DESTRUCTION FROM THE
PRESENCE OF THE LORD, and FROM THE GLORY OF HIS POWER;
10 When he shall come to be glorified in his
saints, and to be
admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was
believed)
in that day.
11 Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our
God would count
you worthy of this calling, and fulfill all the good pleasure of his
goodness,
and the WORK OF FAITH WITH POWER:
12 That the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be
glorified in you,
and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus
Christ."
Romans 12:19 "Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give
place
unto WRATH: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I WILL REPAY, saith
the
Lord." Jesus paid it all for the elect, but those who aren't in Christ
will have to pay for themselves (Which, by the way, they could never
pay enough
to save themselves, only Christ could earn salvation for anyone).
Matthew 13:10-17 "10 And the disciples came, and
said unto
him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is
given unto you to
know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not
given.
12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and
he shall have
more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away
even that
he hath.
13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because
they seeing see
not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias,
which saith, By
hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall
see, and
shall not perceive:
15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and
their ears are dull
of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they
should see
with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with
their
heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and
your ears, for they
hear.
17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets
and righteous men
have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them;
and to
hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them."
Matthew 26:24 (also Mk. 14:21) "24 The Son of man
goeth as it
is written of him: but woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is
betrayed! it
had been good for that man if he had not been born."
It would be better to never even be born than to betray Jesus. If God
had
salvation in store for Judas, Jesus would not have said this.
John 6:64-71 "64 But there are some of you that
believe not.
For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and
who
should betray him.
65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that NO
MAN CAN COME
UNTO ME EXCEPT IT WERE GIVEN UNTO HIM OF MY FATHER.
66 From that time many of his disciples went back,
and walked no
more with him.
67 Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go
away?
68 Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom
shall we go? thou
hast the words of eternal life.
69 And we believe and are sure that thou art that
Christ, the Son
of the living God.
70 Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you
twelve, and one of
you is a devil?
71 He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for
he it was that
should betray him, being one of the twelve."
John 17:1-12 "1 These words spake Jesus, and lifted
up his
eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son,
that thy
Son also may glorify thee:
2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that
he should give
eternal life to as many as thou hast given him.
3 And this is life eternal, that they might know
thee the only true
God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
4 I have glorified thee on the earth: I have
finished the work
which thou gavest me to do.
5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own
self with the
glory which I had with thee before the world was.
6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which
thou gavest me out
of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have
kept thy
word.
7 Now they have known that all things whatsoever
thou hast given me
are of thee.
8 For I have given unto them the words which thou
gavest me; and
they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from
thee, and
they have believed that thou didst send me.
9 I pray for them: I PRAY NOT FOR THE WORLD, BUT
FOR THEM WHICH
THOU HAST GIVEN ME; for they are thine.
10 And all mine are thine, and thine are mine; and
I am glorified
in them.
11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are
in the world,
and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom
thou
hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.
12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them
in thy name:
those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but
the son of
PERDITION [That is Judas, who betrayed Christ]; that the scripture
might be
fulfilled."
Mark 9:42-48 "42 And whosoever shall offend one of
these
little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone
were
hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.
43 And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is
better for thee
to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into HELL, into
the FIRE
THAT NEVER SHALL BE QUENCHED:
44 WHERE THEIR WORM DIETH NOT, AND THE FIRE IS NOT
QUENCHED.
45 And if thy foot offend thee, cut it off: it is
better for thee
to enter halt into life, than having two feet to be cast into hell,
into the
FIRE THAT NEVER SHALL BE QUENCHED:
46 Where their worm DIETH NOT, AND THE FIRE IS NOT
QUENCHED.
47 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it
is better for
thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two
eyes to be
cast into hell fire:
48 Where their worm dieth not, and the FIRE IS NOT
QUENCHED."
Here it does not say everlasting fire, but if it is "never quenched"
than I think it is everlasting. Also, even though people are destroyed
in hell,
they are not annihilated (just so you don't think I believe that).
And finally, Luke 16:19-31 (Note the fact that there is no going
between heaven
and hell (or relief for those in hell), so those who are in hell must
stay
there for eternity. "19 There was a certain rich
man, which
was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:
20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus,
which was laid at
his gate, full of sores,
21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which
fell from the rich
man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.
22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and
was carried by
the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
23 And IN HELL he lift up his eyes, BEING IN
TORMENTS, and seeth
Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have
mercy on me, and
send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool
my
tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy
lifetime
receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now
he is
comforted, and thou art tormented.
26 And beside all this, BETWEEN US AND YOU THERE IS
A GREAT GULF
FIXED: SO THAT THEY WHICH WOULD PASS FROM HENCE TO YOU CAN NOT; NEITHER
CAN
THEY PASS TO US, THAT WOULD COME FROM THENCE.
27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father,
that thou wouldest
send him to my father's house:
28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify
unto them, lest
they also come into this place of torment.
29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the
prophets; let
them hear them.
30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one
went unto them from
the dead, they will repent.
31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and
the prophets,
neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
There are many more passages we could quote, but I will not do so now.
I would
like to point out though the importance of proclaiming that today is
the day of
salvation. There is a time coming when it will be everlasting to late.
Hebrews 3:7-4:13
So, as the Holy Spirit says:
"Today, if you hear his voice,
do not
harden your hearts
as you did in the rebellion,
during the time of
testing in the desert,
where your fathers tested and tried me
and for forty years
saw what I did.
That is why I was angry with that generation,
and I said, 'Their
hearts are always going
astray,
and they have not
known my ways.'
So I declared on oath in my anger,
'They shall never
enter my rest.' "
See to it, brothers, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart
that
turns away from the living God. But encourage one another daily, as
long as it
is called Today, so that none of you may be hardened by sin's
deceitfulness. We
have come to share in Christ if we hold firmly till the end the
confidence we
had at first. As has just been said:
"Today, if you hear his voice,
do not harden your
hearts
as you did in the rebellion."
Who
were they who heard and rebelled? Were they not all those Moses led out
of Egypt?
And with
whom was he angry for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned,
whose
bodies fell in the desert? And to whom did God swear that they would
never enter
his rest if not to those who disobeyed ? So we see that they were not
able to
enter, because of their unbelief. Therefore, since the promise of
entering his
rest still stands, let us be careful that none of you be found to have
fallen
short of it. For we also have had the gospel preached to us, just as
they did;
but the message they heard was of no value to them, because those who
heard did
not combine it with faith. Now we who have believed enter that rest,
just as
God has said,
"So I declared on oath in my anger,
'They shall never enter my rest.' " And yet his work has
been
finished since the creation of the world. For somewhere he has spoken
about the
seventh day in these words: "And on the seventh day God rested from all
his work." And again in the passage above he says, "They shall never
enter my rest."
It still remains that some will enter that rest, and those who formerly
had the
gospel preached to them did not go in, because of their disobedience.
Therefore
God again set a certain day, calling it Today, when a long time later
he spoke
through David, as was said before:
"Today, if you hear his voice,
do not harden your
hearts." For if Joshua
had given them rest, God would not have spoken later about another day.
There
remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who
enters
God's rest also rests from his own work, just as God did from his. Let
us,
therefore, make every effort to enter that rest, so that no one will
fall by
following their example of disobedience.
For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged
sword,
it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it
judges
the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Nothing in all creation is
hidden from
God's sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of
him to
whom we must give account."
Your
friend,
Aaron
P.S. I would like to point out that, when taken in their true context,
and
along with the whole counsel of God, It is not necessary to perform
"theological gymnastics" to the supposed "universalist
texts". I believe in the holy universal church (the church extends
through
out the whole world, as opposed to the old testament Jewish church in
the
wilderness) and most of the "universalist texts" you use are speaking
of this, While others are just speaking in general (not being
specific). Maybe
I will be able to tackle Romans 5 next.
Aaron,
You present many questions and objections to Ultimate Reconciliation. I
am glad
our discussion has come to this point. If you are like me, you will not
be able
to accept Universal Salvation unless the scriptures about punishment
are in
harmony with the doctrine of Universalism. Being raised with Eternal
Torment
filtering my scriptural understanding, it took a long time for me to
see that
God would bring all into harmony with Him. I needed to have all my
objections
answered, and that doesn't happen overnight. For years I read the New
Testament
with both perspectives in mind... asking God to reveal His mind to me.
Together, we have the mind of Christ, and God can guide us into truth.
You may
not find my understanding convincing right away, but I will try to
share some
of the thoughts that have helped me to accept Ultimate reconciliation,
and to
reject the doctrine of eternal torment.Maybe in time, as you read and
reread
the New Testament, some of my thoughts will seem more reasonable than
they do
now.
You ask, If people still go to hell, then what is it that Christ saves
them
from. You seem to suggest that if they go to hell, then they could not
have
been going through the process of being saved. This is too
narrow a view
of salvation. Salvation is not just from hell. Salvation is from
danger,
distress, bondage, enemies, oppression affliction, sickness, sin,
demons, and
death. Following your logic, if a person is being saved, then they
could not
experience sickness, oppression, death or hell. But Salvation is an
ongoing process
from all these things. We are not just saved from these things, ( so
that we
never experience any trouble ), but also OUT FROM these things (after
having
experienced them). Therefore, man can be saved out from hell, just as
he is
saved from any other torment. Historically, salvation was finished on
the
cross. Now, it is also a process that man goes through. And finally,
man will
be saved in the ages to come as salvation is competed and the
consummation
arrives. You facetiously argue that if all are included in Christ that
none
would go to hell. This is a reasonable argument, and there are some
Universalists that hold to this view.
However, I am not so convinced. I tend to believe in punishment after
death... and
I often think it will be much hotter than most Christians think.
Our God is a consuming fire, and it is a fearful thing to fall into the
hands
of the living God. However, believing in the remedial nature of all
punishment,
even punishment serves to correct us and to bring us to Christ.
You suggest that 1 Corinthians 15 refers to the church and not to all
mankind.
However, 1 Corinthians 15:27 clearly states who and what is included in
submission to the Father.
15:22 says " in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made
alive."
Is this just for the Church? Lets read carefully. There are 3
stages
leading up
to the consummation of all things.
1. Christ is made alive.
2. Those who are Christ's ( the church) are made alive at his coming.
15:22
3. Then cometh the end. ...when ALL THINGS shall be subjected unto him.
Even the Son subjects himself to the Father. (15:28)
It is abundantly clear that the only thing that is excepted from this
subjection to God,
is God himself! That is exactly what 1 Corinthians 15:27 says.
It states that " it is manifest that He ( The Father ) is excepted,
which did put all things under Him (Christ)".
He (God the Father ) is the only exception to the subjection
of ALL
THINGS.
All else is included. The only exception to the ALL, is God himself.
It is not just the church that is made subject to God. It is
not just
Christ who is subject to the Father. Absolutely everything, is included
in this
submission. God becomes all in ALL, just as he is in Christ. Everything
to
everyone.
Once
again, "In Adam
all die , even so in Christ shall ALL be made alive." To narrow 1
Corinthians 15 to apply to just the church is to ignore the universal
extent
explicitly stated in the passage and to avoid the solidarity of all
mankind
with both Adam and with Christ. Or else "why baptize for the dead?",
(15:29).
I agree, the proper meaning of the word aionios (whether eternal or "of
the ages") must be determined by the context of the passage and the
larger
Biblical Salvation message. We are wise not to impose the most extreme
definition ( eternal ) of the word in all occurrences of it's use.
You argue that hell is eternal and that God does not intend to save
people who
are in hell. Let's look at some scripture that challenges both of these
concepts. We read that Death is the last enemy to be destroyed ( 1
Corinthians
15:26 ). Revelation 20:14 says that Death and Hell are thrown into the
lake of
fire Both Death and Hell are temporary. They are destroyed after they
have
served their purpose.
Is there biblical support for the idea that those who have died and
gone to
hell (hades) may have a second chance? There are many scriptures that
suggest
that hell is not the end or permanent. It seems to me that one has to
be pretty
dogmatic in their interpretation of the scriptures to completely rule
out the
possibility of a second chance. 1 Peter 4:6 says "For this cause was
the
Gospel preached to them that are DEAD" ... "He
went and preached unto the spirits in PRISON; which sometime were
DISOBEDIENT". Ephesians 4:8-10 says that "when He ascended up on high
He led CAPTIVITY captive.... that He might fill all things." Not just
the
Christians. He fills all things. Romans 14:9-11 says that " to this end
Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord of both
of the
DEAD and the living... every knee shall bow and every tongue shall
confess to
God." What does this mean? This is a reference to Isaiah 45:22-24
"Look unto me and be ye saved all the ends of the earth...Every knee
shall
bow and every tongue shall swear." This was bowing the knee unto
salvation, not out of compulsion. The confession that was
made when a
person became a Christian was "Jesus is Lord". 1 Corinthians 12:3
states "No man can say that 'Jesus is the Lord', but by the Holy
Ghost"
We read that " At the name of Jesus, every knee should bow, of things
in
heaven, of things in earth, AND OF THINGS UNDER THE EARTH, and that
every
tongue should confess that Jesus is Lord, to the glory of God the
Father."
And "if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt
believe in thine heart that God has raised him from the dead, thou
shalt be SAVED"
( Romans 10:9 ). "IN THE AGES TO COME, he will shew the exceeding
riches
of his grace" (Ephesians 2:7). Referring to those who had been in hell
(hades), when Death and Hell (hades) were thrown into the Lake of Fire,
it is
said, "and whosoever was not found in the book of life was cast into
the
lake of fire" (Revelation 20:15). that some from hades were not found
in
the book of life, at least implies that some who were in hell may have
been
found in the book of life. How could this happen unless there was a
second
chance? Truly, today is the day of salvation, and his mercy never ends.
You state that there is no higher purpose of God. Perhaps, I should
speak of
the ultimate purpose, or end purpose, or the consummation. The purpose
of God
is worked out step by step, until all is fulfilled. This is referred to
in 1
Corinthians 15:28 when God becomes ALL in ALL.
You speak of destruction. God does destroy all opposition to him. Then
He makes
all things new. You also mention the use of the word "forever"
in the Old Testament. Olam in the Hebrew is a word that should almost
never be
translated as forever, but tradition dies hard. The Jews had the
concept of a
beginning and a consummation, but the Greek idea of "Eternity, " was
quite foreign to their thinking. The Jewish roots of the New Testament
is
another strong argument for understanding " Aion, and Aionios" in the
New Testament as limited time (ages, or of the ages)
rather than applying the stronger Greek understanding of "Eternal". A
thoughtful study of these words helps to liberate our minds from
doctrinal bias
that may prevent us from seeing truth. I find it amazing that the
understanding
of just a couple of words can lead to a completely different
theological
outlook on scripture, and of the nature of God.
You also quote a number of New Testament scriptures speaking of the
judgment of
God. All these fit comfortably within a Universalist view. You quote
them quite
extensively. Perhaps you feel they pose a challenge to a universalist
view
point. I don't see any such difficulty. Yes, many go to destruction,
(Matthew
7:13-14). God kills to make alive.
You quote Matthew 12:31-32. This suggests that there is forgiveness to
be found
in the coming ages. Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost is not forgiven
during
that age or even during the one that immediately followed...but "all
blasphemy
shall be forgiven unto men" so it must be in the ages to come that His
mercy is revealed. Otherwise, the power of the cross is diminished, the
efficacy of the blood is denied, the works of the devil are not
destroyed,
Jesus does not take away the sin of the world, and the plan of God is
defeated.
You can choose to limit God and his mercy that never ends, or you can
understand that the plan of God is not worked out overnight, and that
some sins
are dealt with more harshly than others.
You also quote 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12. You seem to understand that God
sends
strong delusion that they may believe a lie, "that they all might be
DAMNED". As much as I love the poetic beauty of the good old King James
Version it is misleading in this case. The newer versions replace
"damned" with judged. The difference is obvious.
You also mention the coming of the Lord and the foolish virgins being
shut out.
Again, God calls who he wills, when he wills. Salvation is not of the
will of
man. This might be off topic, but I tend to view Matthew
24-25 as
referring to Christ's return in judgment against the unbelieving Jews,
and Jerusalem
( Mystery
Babylon ), through the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. ( See
Matthew 24:1-3
). I tend to see this as the end of the Old Covenant. The New Covenant
being
inaugurated at the cross. In fact many of the New Testament references
to
judgment, and even to the coming of the Lord often reference back to
God's judgment
on the Jewish nation, Jerusalem,
and the temple for their rejection of the covenant and Jesus.
I find it interesting that, you feel that many universalist texts refer
to the
church, and I feel that many of the judgment passages refer to
unbelieving Israel.
Perhaps,
we are both right some of the time. If you are interested in this, you
will
find a couple of links to fulfillment prophecy, or preterism on my web
site
under Restoration links/Prophecy Fulfilled - God's Perfect Church http://www.angelfire.com/dc/universalism/SiteLinks.html
Matthew
26:24 It would be
better for Judas to never have been born. I have taken this to imply
that Judas
will be punished strongly. To whom much is given, much shall be
required. He
may face more stripes than is required of the ignorant. With an
understanding
that babies are included within the kingdom... it is better to die
before
birth... in miscarriage...and be included in the kingdom, than to be
born and
and betray Christ and be shut out from the kingdom.
Mark 9:42-48 where their worm dieth not and the fire is not quenched.
This is a
literal reference to the Gehenna, the valley
of Hinnon
just below Jerusalem,
and
should not be confused with the lake of fire, or even hades (or hell).
The
worms feed on the carcasses of criminals. The fire was kept burning at
all
times. If you want to spiritualize Gehenna and make it out to be the
fires of
hell in an afterlife, may I suggest you consider Matthew 5:22-26. This
passage
says that the offender will never be released until he has paid the
uttermost
farthing. I suspect you would prefer to take this passage literally,
rather
than suggest a release from the prison-house of hell.
Luke 16:19-31 is the story of the rich man and Lazarus. I find it
interesting
that eternal torment promoters find this verse so conclusive. Some
scholars,
and many universalists see in this story a parable of the rich man (Israel).
looking
down upon the sinners and publicans, (Lazarus) who are kept outside
with the
dogs. I find this a reasonable explanation. However, there are those
who want
to view this not as a parable, but as an actual event. Even if not a
parable, I
don't find any great difficulty here. This a story that is
pre-resurrection.
Even if the situation
seemed hopeless for the rich man, the resurrection changed all that.
The keys
of death and hell can open prison doors that may have previously been
locked (Revelation
1:18). Christ is victorious.
Dean Johnson
Dear Dean,
in answer to your recent letter I would like to start out by
pointing out that, first of all, salvation is not a process that
individuals go
through, that punishment isn't remedial, and then I would also like to
show you
that the following statement you made isn't true (with the exception of
hell).
And I quote "Following your logic, if a person is being saved, then
they
could not experience sickness, oppression, death or hell."
It appears to me that you are saying (particularly in the second
paragraph of
your most recent letter) that salvation is a process that individuals
go
through. By holding this view, you are then more able to establish your
belief
that God uses even punishment to bring us to Christ and save us
(remedial
punishment). However, the bible teaches neither of these things. If you
were to
say that salvation is a process for God's people as a whole (that is,
that God
brings each one of his elect to salvation in his own time until they
are all
brought in) then I would agree. But to say that salvation is a process
for
individuals is serious error.
Salvation (when speaking of an individual) is not a process, but rather
there
is a specific moment (which God has predetermined) in the life of the
individual, when he is really, actually, and positively saved, when he
is
passed from death to life: "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that
heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting
life, and
shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life."
(Jn. 5:24).
The actual time of the salvation of an individual, as the bible
teaches, is
tied to the time of the individual's justification. If you are not
justified,
you are still in your sins and not saved at all (even if you are going
to be
saved in the future). To be justified is to be pardoned of your sins
(through
Christ's blood, Eph. 1:7) and declared righteous by God (only because
Christ's
righteousness is imputed to us, Rom. 4:6-8;22-25), so it is an ACT of
God's
grace were he effectively saves you. The actual time of an individual's
justification is tied to the moment that individual (by God's grace)
puts his
faith in Christ (Rom. 3:22,25,26-28,30;4:3-5,9,11,13). The Bible says
that
faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God (Rom.10:17). So
the
means that God uses to bring people to salvation is his word. It is of
course
the Holy Spirit though, that regenerates us, and works faith in us
using God's
word.
So, does God use tribulations to cause people to look to him for help
and be
saved? He very well may (though never apart from his word and the Holy
Spirit).
Does God chasten those he loves who are already saved, to cause them to
flee
all the more to him and to bring them closer to him? Yes. Does God use
PUNISHMENT on people to bring them to salvation? no! Now you may be
wondering,
why not? We should always remember though, that there is a big
difference
between punishment (which is for the purpose of justice), and
tribulations
(that is, ordinary tribulations of this earth), rebukes, discipline,
chastisement, reproof and correction which are all often intended for
the good
of the the one receiving them (though not always). 2 Thessalonians
1:3-12
illustrates this well:
"We are bound to thank God always for you, brethren, as it is meet,
because that your faith groweth exceedingly, and the charity of every
one of
you all toward each other aboundeth; So that we ourselves glory in you
in the
churches of God for your PATIENCE AND FAITH IN ALL YOUR PERSECUTIONS
AND
TRIBULATIONS THAT YE ENDURE: WHICH IS A MANIFEST TOKEN OF THE RIGHTEOUS
JUDGMENT OF GOD, THAT YE MAY BE COUNTED WORTHY OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD,
FOR WHICH
YE ALSO SUFFER: Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense
tribulation to them that trouble you; And to you who are troubled rest
with us,
when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty
angels, In
flaming fire TAKING VENGEANCE ON THEM THAT KNOW NOT GOD, AND THAT OBEY
NOT THE
GOSPEL OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST: WHO SHALL BE PUNISHED WITH EVERLASTING
DESTRUCTION FROM THE PRESENCE OF THE LORD, AND FROM THE GLORY OF HIS
POWER;
When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in
all them
that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that
day.
Wherefore also we pray always for you, that our God would count you
worthy of
this calling, and fulfill all the good pleasure of his goodness, and
the work
of faith with power: That the name of our Lord Jesus Christ may be
glorified in
you, and ye in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord
Jesus
Christ."
So we see suffering, persecutions and tribulations being used by God
for the
good of his people, but punishment and destruction from God's presence,
for the
sake of vengeance on those who do not themselves believe, but who
trouble God's
people. If Christ satisfied the justice of God for the latter
categoryof
people just now mentioned, then they would not rreceivepunishment or
destruction from God's presence--the just payment to satisfy God's
justice
apart from Christ. But again, Romans 12:19 says: "Dearly beloved,
avenge
not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written,
Vengeance
is mine; I WILL REPAY, saith the Lord." So they (who aaren'tin Christ)
are
going to be repaid themselves. To show that this punishment that
satisfies
God's justice is not remedial we read in Proverbs 29:1: "He, that being
often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be DESTROYED, and
that
WITHOUT REMEDY."
This brings us to the next point. If Jesus died for his people, why do
they
suffer at all? If we are going to be consistent with what was just
said, wouldn't
that mean that those who Christ died for would escape not only hell,
but every
kind of suffering altogether? This kind of reasoning fits well coming
from your
perspective on things. Because If Christ, the second Adam, came to
totally undo
all that the first Adam did and caused, then that would mean that all
suffering
actually should have been abolished at the cross. Christ
actuallyshould
have made all things new then (I'm not saying this is what you teach).
Christ
however, came to take our sins and the punishment for them upon
himself. He did
not come to lift the curse from this world or to save every individual.
Nor did
he come to take us out of this cursed world iimmediately but sent us
INTO the
world with his word, the world that hates us, which also hated him:
"I have given them thy word; and the world hath hated them, because
they
are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. I PRAY NOT THAT
THOU
SHOULDEST TAKE THEM OUT OF THE WORLD, but that thou shouldest keep them
from
the evil. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
Sanctify
them through thy truth: thy word is truth. As thou hast sent me into
the world,
even so have I ALSO SENT THEM INTO THE WORLD. And for their sakes I
sanctify
myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth." (Jn.
17:14-19)
You see sickness, misery, sorrow, physical death etc. are all
consequences or
side affects of sin, not the actual punishment its self. They could
never
satisfy the justice of God as our punishment for sin or else Christ
(God's only
begotten Son) would not have needed to die for us in the manner that he
did (if
they were the punishment, than Christ's death would have saved us from
having
to suffer them at all). they are part of the curse that God placed on
this
earth after our first parents sinned, but they are not the actual
punishment
for that sin. The other category of things we suffer, flow directly
from the
sinfulness that is still in this world (persecution, oppression etc.).
Christianity is a cross religion. Jesus said "...If any man will come
after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me."
(Mt. 16:24) So if we receive these latter kinds of suffering for
Christ's sake
we are actually blessed (Mt. 5:10,11).
Though Christ came to save his people from their sins (and of course
the
punishment for them): (Mt. 1:21) "...and thou shalt call his name
JESUS:
for he shall save his people from their sins.", the salvation Christ
has
provided WILL, however save us from even the curse and from committing
more
sins. Though we are actually and truly saved now (if we are believers)
and we
have already passed from death to life, we still have a promised
inheritance
that awaits us as children of God through adoption. Even though we do
have to
suffer for a time under the curse, and even though we do still sin
(though not
willingly, Rom.
7:7-25) and even go through the most dreadful part of the curse
(physical
death), we still have the hope of the resurrection, glorification and
eternal
life. Jesus said: "...I am the resurrection, and the life: he that
believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever
liveth
and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?" (Jn.
11:25-26).
We who believe, have eternal life in store for us and life that will be
not
under a curse, but where there is no sin, curse or punishment. There is
going
to be a new heaven and a new earth after the present ones are passed
away (see
Rev. 21:1-8) and most importantly we will be with our God. We will
survive our
own death and the punishment for our sins doesn't apply to us, because
our sins
are forgiven, we have the righteousness of Christ and therefore we
CANNOT be
condemned!
You see, Christ "secured" salvation for the elect on the cross, As
you have said "it is finished", so that the elect absolutely WILL
have eternal life and no punishment (or condemnation). He rose again
for our
justification so that when we hear the word of God and believe (which
must be
in this lifetime, see the 3rd paragraph of my last letter) and are at
that time
justified, we absolutely DO have eternal life from then on. and now
(though we
suffer for a short time under the curse and for Christ's sake) we wait
for the
promised inheritance which we will receive at the time of our
glorification, all
the while being sanctified. No one who Christ died for can possibly go
to hell!
It has taken me way to long to say what I've said so far, because I
have tried
to be specific. I have only really covered the first 3 paragraphs of
your last
letter to me so far, but I hope to cover the rest of it before you
reply to
this letter. I am going to close for now, but I hope to write again
soon. Your
friend,
Aaron
Aaron Continues: Part 2
Dean, to continue my letter to you I would like to start by
looking
briefly at 1 Corinthians 15. In my previous letter I said that Paul
MOSTLY has
the church in mind in this passage. I did not go into detail so I would
like to
clarify what I meant by that now. First of all, we were originally
discussing
"death is no longer the end or victorious enemy" (not whether or not
all things will be subjected to God). You were saying that that is true
for
even those who die without faith in Christ and so I very briefly tried
to point
out that death is no longer victorious because.. "o death, were is thy
sting? O grave, where is thy victory? the STING OF DEATH IS SIN; and
the
strength of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, which giveth US
[speaking to
the church] the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." You see, If the
sting of death is sin, and yet there are those who DIE in their sins,
the sting
remains for them, But WE (who live by faith) have been redeemed by
Christ from
the curse of the law (Gal. 3:13), which (law), we are told here, is the
strength of sin. Christ took the sting away from those he justifies,
and
justification must be before death or else the sting remains. Death is
no
longer victorious over believers then.
The theme of 1 Corinthians 15 is the resurrection of the dead who are
in
Christ, for which Paul makes many arguments..
"16 For if the dead rise not, then is not Christ
raised:
17 And if Christ be not raised, YOUR FAITH IS IN
VAIN; YE ARE YET
IN YOUR SINS.
18 Then they also which are fallen asleep IN CHRIST
ARE PERISHED.
19 If in this life only we have hope IN CHRIST, we
are of all men
most miserable.
20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and
become the
firstfruits of them that slept [referring back to those which are
fallen asleep
IN CHRIST]."
Christ rose for our justification, but if Christ didn't rise our faith
would be
in vain. There would be no justification even though we believe ("...ye
are yet in your sins"), and if no justification than those who die in
Christ are PERISHED, just like everyone else who dies in their sins. We
who are
in Christ would be the most miserable of all men (because of the
suffering for
Christ's sake as christians in this world) if Christ hadn't risen to
justify us
and give us the sure hope of the resurrection.
"21 For since by man came death, by man came also
the
resurrection of the dead.
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall
all be made
alive.
23 But every man in his own order: Christ the
firstfruits;
afterward they that are Christ's at his coming."
Christ had to become man to accomplish salvation for man (as a side
comment
though, He had to be fully God at the same time or his death would have
been
for himself only, and couldn't save anyone at all, including himself).
Verse 22, in this particular context, I believe to be referring to
believers
only in both parts. In other words, All of you die with Adam (in this
case, not
speaking of the whole world, though that also would be true if that
were what
he intended to say), but you also will be made alive in Christ (still
not
speaking of the whole world). (i e "Just as sure as all of you
believers
are going to die (with Adam), you are going to be made alive in Christ.
Don't
listen to those among you who say there is no resurrection (vs. 12),
Christ was
raised and was seen of over 500 brethren (vs.6) why should you now deny
that
which you have believed (vss.1,2)). Even if this interpretation of mine
is not
correct, There is only one other thing it could mean and still be in
harmony
with the rest of the scriptures, which we will see when we look at Rom.
5
(hopefully soon). To say that this is referring to the whole world fits
awkwardly in the context at best, and it even goes against the whole
idea of
vss.16-20 and 55-58 (as well as many other scriptures). Christ is the
firstfruits of those who are his. We are told the order of the
resurrection.
First Christ, and then those who are his at his coming, period! Paul is
not
here saying that the unjust will not be resurrected (they will, and
unto
damnation. see Jn. 5:29), but he is only speaking of believers in this
passage.
Paul goes on to give further argument for the resurrection. Christ
reigns and
conquers all things... even death.
"24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have
delivered up the
kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule
and all
authority and power.
25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies
under his feet.
26 The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
27 For he hath put all things under his feet. But
when he saith all
things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did
put all
things under him.
28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him,
then shall the
Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him,
that God
may be all in all."
Here, the argument for the resurrection is that that death will be
destroyed.
You seem to think the fact that all things will be put under him means
that all
will be saved. While that is sometimes the way God does away with his
enemies
(by saving them) that is not what is in mind here. Christ is going to
put all
his enemies under his feet. He is going to do this by both saving his
people,
and by destroying his enemies (the last of which is death). Psalm 110
speaks of
this:
"1 The LORD said unto my Lord [Christ], Sit thou at
my right
hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
2 The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out
of Zion:
rule thou in the
midst of thine enemies.
3 THY PEOPLE SHALL BE WILLING IN THE DAY OF THY
POWER, in the
beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of
thy
youth.
4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou
art a priest for
ever after the order of Melchizedek.
5 THE LORD AT THY RIGHT HAND SHALL STRIKE THROUGH
KINGS IN THE DAY
OF HIS WRATH.
6 HE SHALL JUDGE AMONG THE HEATHEN, HE SHALL FILL
THE PLACES WITH
DEAD BODIES; HE SHALL WOUND THE HEADS OVER MANY COUNTRIES.
7 He shall drink of the brook in the way: therefore
shall he lift
up the head."
I would also like to point out that God being "all in all" doesn't
mean "everything to everyone" as you have suggested. It seems to me
that this is saying that God may be complete (speaking of the relation
of the
Father and the Son in the context). Satan and his kingdom will not be
victorious over Christ and his kingdom. The fact that they will be cast
into
the lake of fire shows their utter defeat!
I'm not certain what you were getting at when you said "or else why
baptize for the dead" in your argument, but I do know that Paul is
arguing
further for the resurrection.
"29 Else what shall they do which are baptized for
the dead,
if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?
30 And why stand we in jeopardy every hour?
31 I protest by your rejoicing which I have in
Christ Jesus our
Lord, I die daily.
32 If after the manner of men I have fought with
beasts at Ephesus,
what advantageth
it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die.
33 Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt
good manners.
34 Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some
have not the
knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame."
No one seems to be certain of what "baptized for the dead" means, but
the most sensible opinion I've heard is that it is speaking of martyrs.
I quote
matthew henry "Why do they suffer martyrdom for their religion [if
there
is no resurrection]? This is sometimes called the baptism of blood by
the
ancients." Paul continues this same kind of argument, and then warns
against the worldly idea of "living to the fullest now because this is
all
there is". Paul goes on to tell of what kind of bodies we will be
raised
with, and in the very last verse of chapter 15 (still speaking to the
church)
he says "58 Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye
steadfast,
unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye
know that
your labour is not in vain in the Lord."
Now we shall move on to our next point. You say "I agree, the proper
meaning of aionios (whether eternal or "of the ages") must be
determined by the context of the passage and the larger Biblical
Salvation
message." you then go on to say "We are wise not to impose the most
extreme definition (eternal) of the word in all occurrences of it's
use."
Might I suggest though, that if it can be found to mean eternal even
once when
speaking of hell, would not that then tell us that hell is always
eternal (in
all passages)? Again, if we can deduce from the many descriptions of
hell in
the bible, that it is eternal, than that is how we should always
understand
aionios when speaking of hell. I would like to suggest for you to go
back and
read my previous letter, as I do not feel you did justice to many of my
points.
In your last letter, you attempted to prove that "both death and hell
are
temporary" by referring to Rev. 20:14: "And death and hell were cast
into the lake of fire. This is the second death." However that does not
prove any of what you are saying, for in Rev. 6:8 we read "And I
looked,
and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and
Hell
followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part
of the
earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with
the beasts
of the earth." So Rev.20:14 could just be talking about two wicked
horse
riders who in the end will be cast into the lake of fire! We aren't
left to
such speculation though, because the Rev. 20 context makes it all clear.
"11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that
sat on it,
from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found
no
place for them.
12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand
before God; and the
books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of
life: and
the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the
books,
according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it;
and death and
hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged
every man
according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of
fire. This is the
second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book
of life was cast
into the lake of fire."
Here
we have the final
judgment being described, which takes place after the resurrection (see
Jn.5:29). Notice from vs. 12, that the dead, small and great, are ALL
present to
stand before God in judgment. Notice also that there are books, and
then also,
the book of life. Every single last person is going to be judged
according to
their works... which are written in the books, but only those who's
names are
written in the book of life (who, having been justified, have passed
ALREADY
from death to LIFE), will not be condemned. In vs. 13 we see all the
dead being
present (including those who died and went to hell) EVERY MAN being
judged
according to their works. After the judgment is pronounced we see those
who had
died and gone to hell already, but who were present for the judgment,
being
cast into the lake of fire to suffer the second death (see vs.6 also).
In vs.
15 we see that not only are those who have already DIED and gone to
HELL going
to be cast into the lake of fire, but also the wicked who remain alive
until
Christ's comes again, whose names also are not written in the book of
life. No
one who's name is not written in the book of life by the time they die
(or even
if they should live until Jesus comes and not have their names there at
that
time), will inherit eternal life. Those who's names are written in the
book of
life of the Lamb that was slain (Rev. 13:8), cannot be condemned.
You mentioned two passages from 1 Peter to try to prove that it is
possible to
be saved from hell or have a "second chance". Neither of these cause
any problem for me. 1 Peter 4:6 says:
"For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead,
that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live
according to
God in the spirit."
From
the very thing this
verse is teaching, I believe we can see that Peter is not saying that
the
gospel was preached to anyone after they had already died, rather, on
the
contrary it seems to be saying that the gospel was preached to the dead
in the
past, while they were still in the flesh (or living), that they might
be judged
according to men in the flesh (this would not make any sense if they
were
already dead), but live according to the spirit. The NIV, as a matter
of fact
says: "For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who
ARE NOW DEAD..." (I am not a big fan of the newer versions... to much
paraphrasing, and sometimes the true meaning doesn'tcome
across or is
softened for modernist ears, but this very well could be a better
translation
than the KJV on this particular verse).
1
Peter 3:18-20
"18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins,
the just for
the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the
flesh, but
quickened by the Spirit:
19 By which also he went and preached unto the
spirits in prison;
20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the
longsuffering of
God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein
few,
that is, eight souls were saved by water."
Note that it was not Christ who actually went himself and preached, but
it was
BY THE SPIRIT that he preached. Also notice when this took place... it
was in
the days of Noah and God was longsuffering with them, but only eight
souls were
saved. The rest died in their sins, and so they are in prison. Christ
didn't go
and preach to dead people.
Eph. 4:7-8: "7 But unto every one of US is given
grace
according to the measure of the gift of Christ.
8 Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high,
he led captivity
captive, and gave gifts unto men." You only quoted part of verse eight
and
then part of verse 10, but what this is actually saying is that if we
are in
Christ (which he IS speaking "to the saints which are at Ephesus... the
faithful in Christ Jesus" Chptr. 1:1) we are no longer captive, or
slaves
to sin (see Rom. 6:20-23), but God gives each of us enough grace to
resist
temptation as 1 Cor. 10:13 also says "There hath no temptation taken
you
but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer
you to
be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also
make a way
to escape, that ye may be able to bear it." (see also Heb. 2:18). This
Ephesians 4 passage has nothing to do with those who are dead or in
hell!
Rom. 14:9-11 "9 For to this end Christ both died,
and rose,
and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living.
10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost
thou set at
nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of
Christ.
11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord,
every knee shall
bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God."
Yes Christ is the Lord of both the dead and the living. He rules all.
Verse 11
causes no problem for me (it is interesting that this is mentioned when
Paul is
speaking of the judgment seat of Christ). You correctly refereed back
to Isaiah
45, but you didn't include all the verses that you should have, so you
concluded that this is the bowing of the knee out of salvation, not out
of
compulsion. You are partly right, but the bible teaches it is actually
both.
Lets look at Is. 45:20-25:
"20 Assemble yourselves and come; draw near
together, ye that
are escaped of the nations: they have no knowledge that set up the wood
of
their graven image, and pray unto a god that cannot save.
21 Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take
counsel
together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it
from that
time? have not I the LORD? and there is no God else beside me; a just
God and a
Saviour; there is none beside me.
22 Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of
the earth: for I
am God, and there is none else.
23 I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of
my mouth in
righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow,
every
tongue shall swear.
24 Surely, shall one say, in the LORD have I
righteousness and
strength: even to him shall men come; and ALL THAT ARE INCENSED AGAINST
HIM
SHALL BE ASHAMED.
25 In the LORD shall all the seed of Israel
be justified, and shall
glory."
Here we see a call (to gentiles) to come out from among the heathen and
draw
near together with God's people (keep in mind, this is the OT when Israel
was
God's chosen nation). In verse 22 we see that God's salvation is to be
extended
to ALL the ends of the earth. It will not just remain with natural
.Israel In
vs. 23 we see that EVERY knee shall bow and EVERY tongue shall swear
unto God,
but is this all out of salvation? Verse 24 answers that. We see that
those who
aaren'tsaved in that day shall be ASHAMED! (unlike the saved.."For the
scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall NOT be ashamed. For
there is
no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all
is rich
unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of
the Lord
shall be saved." Rom.10:11-13). But ALL the seed of Israel
shall be
justified in the Lord, and shall glory. This of course is not speaking
of
natural Israel,
but of the
Israel of God, or spiritual Israel(the
true children of Abraham by faith in Christ. see Gal. 3.6-18). This
passage
(esp. vs.22) then is a perfect example of how the word "all" is often
used in the bible in a limited sense.
You argue from 1 Cor. 12:3 that this confession that "Jesus is Lord"
must mean that these people will be saved because... "Wherefore I give
you
to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus
accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the
Holy Ghost."
This passage is often misunderstood. Paul is not saying that it is
impossible
to verbally say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Ghost, but he is
speaking
of a true confession of saving faith. That is the kind of confession
that it is
impossible to give apart from the Holy Ghost. In James 2:19 we read:
"Thou
believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also
believe, AND
TREMBLE." You see there is a difference between merely believing, and
believing from you heart. One verse you quoted shows this well: "...if
thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt BELIEVE IN
THINE
HEART that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For
with the
HEART man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession
is made
unto salvation." (Rom.
10:9,10) Also, Mt. 7:21,23: "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord,
Lord,
shall enter into the kingdom of heaven... And then will I profess unto
them, I
never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
You quoted part of Ephesians 2:7, ("That in the ages to come he might
shew
the exceeding riches of his grace") stressing "In the ages to
come" as though this means that God is going to be gracious to those in
hell or something, but you left out the other part of the verse. I
would like
to Quote verses 1-10 because I really like this passage and it is the
whole
immediate context anyway.
"1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in
trespasses and
sins;
2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the
course of this
world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that
now
worketh in the children of disobedience:
3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in
times past in the
lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the
mind; and
were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
4 But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love
wherewith he
loved us,
5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us
together with
Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)
6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit
together in
heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
7 That in the ages to come he might shew the
exceeding riches of
his grace in his kindness toward US through Christ Jesus.
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that
not of
yourselves: it is the gift of God:
9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ
Jesus unto good
works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."
I don't think I need to explain what was wrong with how you used verse
7 of
this passage.
Well, I have been typing for a long time now, so I think I will finnish
in
another letter. There is just so much to say when it comes to God's
word. Thank
you for your patience. Your friend,
Aaron
Aarons continues with part 3 of his letter.
Dean,
In your last letter you commented on my speaking of the destruction of
the wicked. You said (but provided no scripture) that "God does destroy
all opposition to him. Then He makes all things new." By this, it seems
you were implying that God's destruction of his enemies is for the
purpose of
saving them. While that goes against the very nature of destruction,
all things
are possible with God, and so if that were what God chose to do, than I
have no
doubt that he could. However, the scriptures don't leave us guessing
about
this. In fact God does say "I make all things new" and He says it in
the context of the final judgment already having taken place (Rev.
20:11-15),
so could this mean that hell is in fact temporary and that God is going
to save
everyone? What does He mean by the word "all" when He says He
will make all things new? He tells us in the immediate context how we
are to
understand this.
"1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the
first heaven
and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem,
coming down from God
out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying,
Behold, the
tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they
shall be
his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their
eyes; and there
shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there
be any
more pain: for the former things are passed away.
5 And he that sat upon the throne said, BEHOLD, I
MAKE ALL THINGS
NEW. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
6 And he said unto me, it is done. I am Alpha and
Omega, the
beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the
fountain of
the water of life freely.
7 HE THAT OVERCOMETH SHALL INHERIT ALL THINGS; AND
I WILL BE HIS
GOD, AND HE SHALL BE MY SON.
8 BUT THE FEARFUL, AND UNBELIEVING, AND THE
ABOMINABLE, AND
MURDERERS, AND WHOREMONGERS, AND SORCERERS, AND IDOLATERS, AND LIARS,
SHALL
HAVE THEIR PART IN THE LAKE
WHICH BURNETH WITH
FIRE AND BRIMSTONE: WHICH IS THE SECOND DEATH." (Rev. 21:1-8)
So here we see the word "all" being used in a limited sense, as it
often is in the scriptures. God's destroying (in judgment for the
purpose of
justice) is not for the purpose of saving. When God says He will make
all
things new, He does not mean everyone will be saved.
You tell me that the idea of eternity was foreign to the Jews thinking.
I am
not convinced. That would make even God's "everlasting covenant"
(which was "to be a God unto thee and thy seed after thee", the very
covenant of grace itself, which has its fulfillment in Christ
(Gal.3:16) for
both the Old and New Testaments (Heb.9:15), apart from which covenant
of GRACE
then, there is no possibility of salvation) void of being everlasting.
The
believing Jews however, had no doubt that God would keep His covenant
forever, and
that the promised land was not just some land on this sin cursed earth
where
men die, but that there was life beyond the grave (through the Messiah)
where
God would be their God and they would be his people, forever (read
Hebrews 11
with this in mind). The Pharisee's were correct in believing in the
resurrection, and they knew that there was a promised inheritance for
after
this life. They also knew that it matters how we live our life here
because of
what lies ahead in the next life (they were wrong though in thinking
that
righteousness is attained by keeping the law, and since they themselves
could
not keep they law, but they bound others to it, and they also gave a
false
outward appearance of holiness, they were hypocrites and not saved).
The
message of the whole bible (Christ being central), never loses sight of
the
reality of eternity, in both Old and New Testaments.
You say "God kills to make alive" (hinting, I think, that God has a
higher purpose in destroying the wicked). I believe you are referring
to
Deuteronomy 32 as you did in the past. However, is that what it says in
Deuteronomy 32?
"39 See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no
god with
me: I kill, AND I make alive; I wound, AND I heal: neither is there any
that
can deliver out of my hand.
40 For I lift up my hand to heaven, and say, I live
for ever.
41 If I whet my glittering sword, and mine hand
take hold on
judgment; I will render VENGEANCE to mine enemies, and will REWARD them
that
hate me.
42 I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, and my
sword shall
devour flesh; and that with the blood of the slain and of the captives,
from
the beginning of revenges upon the enemy.
43 Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people: for HE
WILL AVENGE THE
BLOOD OF HIS SERVANTS, AND WILL RENDER VENGEANCE TO HIS ADVERSARIES,
AND WILL
BE MERCIFUL UNTO HIS LAND, AND TO HIS PEOPLE."
It does not say here that God kills TO make alive, but that He kills
AND makes
alive. A close look at the context of this passage will also show that
that it
does not mean that He kills TO make alive. God is going to repay his
enemies
for the sake of his justice.
When you commented on Matthew 12:31-32 you concluded that all blasphemy
shall
be forgiven unto men and that it will be forgiven "in the ages to
come". This is not, however, what the passage says.
"31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and
blasphemy
shall be forgiven unto men: BUT [here's the exception] the blasphemy
against
the Holy Ghost SHALL NOT be forgiven unto men.
32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of
man, it shall
be forgiven him: BUT whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it
shall NOT be
forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come."
This is a sin that only those who go to perdition commit. It will NEVER
be forgiven
them, EVER. This is the ONLY sin that will not be forgiven and it is
the sin of
not repenting of your sins, as all those who come to a saving faith (by
the
power of the Holy Ghost) do (repent). It is the sin then, of rejecting
Christ
and his salvation (which is extended to us by the Holy Ghost, that is
what is
meant by blasphemy of the Holy Ghost). Those who do this are still in
their
sins for which there is no forgiveness apart from Christ, so they will
have to
stand as guilty and condemned in the judgment, never having repented in
their
life. The plan of God is not defeated in this, nor is the power of the
cross
diminished. God will save his elect who Christ came to save. The works
of the
devil are destroyed then, both in the cross (by the saving of the
elect), and
in the lake of fire (in the end) and they are destroyed entirely.
You pointed out the different choice of words used in newer versions
from the
old, in 2 Thess. 2:10-12. The newer versions replaced "damned" with
"judged" you say. However, that makes no difference as to what the
meaning is. It is just a softening of words (which could be somewhat
misleading, but the meaning remains the same). Let me illustrate:
"10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness
in them
that PERISH; because THEY RECEIVED NOT THE LOVE OF THE TRUTH, THAT THEY
MIGHT
BE SAVED.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong
delusion, that
they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be.. (judged) WHO BELIEVED
NOT the truth,
but had pleasure in unrighteousness."
To be judged in unbelief IS to be damned. The context verifies this as
well, so
it relay makes no difference which word is used.
While I don't agree with your interpretation of Mt. 25:1-12, I don't
see what
difference it makes to the subject at hand. There are still those who
are
"shut out" and who will not have the door opened to them (vss.10-12).
This is speaking of the kingdom of heaven (vs.1).
Your interpretation of Mt. 26:24 seems far fetched. The bible doesn't
tell us
that those who die in their infancy go to heaven. IF, they are God's
elect
though, then I have no doubt that they will, but who knows but God?
Judas will
be punished severely though, I agree with you on that.
You say that Mark 9:42-48 is a literal reference to the HinnonValley
(Gehenna). It may be so that the word used is that for Gehenna, but I
believe
that in this case, Christ MUST be referring to something much worse,
but using
Gehenna as something of an illustration. The reason I say this is
mostly
because of what is on the other side of the coin.
"42 And whosoever shall offend one of these little
ones that
believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about
his
neck, and he were cast into the sea.
43 And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is
better for thee
to ENTER into LIFE maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into
the fire
that never shall be quenched:
44 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not
quenched.
45 And if thy foot offend thee, cut it off: it is
better for thee
to ENTER halt into LIFE, than having two feet to be cast into hell,
into the
fire that never shall be quenched:
46 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not
quenched.
47 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it
is better for
thee to ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM of God with one eye, than having two
eyes to be
cast into hell fire:
48 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not
quenched."
I
do not believe that I am
spiritualizing this any more than Christ was. It seems clear to me that
He is talking
about either being condemned to that place after death were the fire is
never
quenched, or, on the other side of the coin, ENTERING life which is in
the
kingdom of God. If we are to take part in God's kingdom, we must not be
given
over to temptation. This is a spiritual matter, and if not taken so,
this
passage looses its whole meaning and importance. I believe the KJV is
correct
in translating it the way it does. Matthew 5:26 however, ("Verily I say
unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid
the
uttermost farthing") should not be taken as speaking of hell because of
the context:
"25 Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou
art in the
way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge,
and the
judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
26 Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means
come out thence,
till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing."
Verses 25 and 26 are clearly not speaking of being delivered over by
your adversary
to God to be cast into hell, but it is clearly speaking of civil
justice.
I believe Luke 16:19-31 (the Rich man and Lazarus) is in fact a
parable, but
parables are not just nice little stories, they always teach spiritual
truths,
and they are profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction, and
instruction in
righteousness, just like any other scripture. The difference between
this
particular parable and many others, is that this parable does not use
objects
to represent what is being said (like, for example, the parable of the
sower),
but it is very straight forward and there should be no difficulty
interpreting
it just by reading carefully what it says.
"19 There was a certain rich man, which was clothed
in purple
and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:
20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus,
which was laid at
his gate, full of sores,
21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which
fell from the rich
man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.
22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and
was carried by
the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in
torments, and seeth
Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have
mercy on me, and
send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool
my
tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy
lifetime
receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now
he is
comforted, and thou art tormented.
26 And beside all this, between us and you there is
a great gulf
fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither
can they
pass to us, that would come from thence.
27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father,
that thou wouldest
send him to my father's house:
28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify
unto them, lest
they also come into this place of torment.
29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the
prophets; let
them hear them.
30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one
went unto them from
the dead, they will repent.
31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and
the prophets,
neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
You say: "this a story that is pre-resurrection. Even if the situation
seemed hopeless for the rich man, the resurrection changed all that." I
would like to point out though that this is not pre-ressurection
(though it is
before the event of Christ's resurrection). In Mt. 22:31-33 we read:
"31 But as touching the resurrection of the dead,
have ye not
read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,
32 I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac,
and the God of
Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.
33 And when the multitude heard this, they were
astonished at his
doctrine."
Christ said this before his own death and resurrection, but yet we see
that he
speaks of the resurrection as something that was already taking place.
How
could this be if Christ is the firstfuits? In Rev.13:8 Christ is spoken
of as
the "Lamb slain from the foundation of the world". This, of course
does not mean that He actually died then, but that, as the book of
Hebrews
says, Christ died ONCE for all time. So Christ's death is not only
effective in
the NT (after having actually happened), but all those who came to God
by faith
in the OT, came to him only through Christ's shed blood, which is and
always
has been the ONLY possible way to the Father. If they came then, to God
through
the cross of Christ, which hadn't yet happened, why wouldn't they also
experience the resurrection that is through Christ (I am not speaking
of the
resurrection of the body which will take place for everyone when Christ
comes
again at the end of the world. see Jn. 5:28,29) which hadn't yet
happened. And
as we have seen in Mt.22:31-33, they did experience that resurrection.
So to
say that the parable of the Rich man and Lazarus was pre-resurrection
and that
the resurrection changed the rich man's hopeless estate, just
simply
isn'ttrue.
I hope you will go back and re-read my previous letter to you, as there
are
several passages that I refereed to that you have been silent about in
your
response to me. I know that it is not always necessary to address every
single
one of them (sometimes only the major foundational ones need to be
),addressed
but I feel that there were some that present pretty important problems
to
universalism that you may want to re-read.
I hope this three-part letter has been helpful to you and that God will
use his
word to convince you of these things. As I have said before, This is
not a
pleasant subject for me, or for that matter, anyone that I know of, but
it is
one that is essential to true evangelism. It is also truth that God has
given
us, which one should never exchange for a lie. The fact that God is
perfectly
holy and just in all of this, should cause us to fall down before God
and
worship as did Job (chptr.1 vs.20). All those who are saved, should
also see
how great their salvation really is, knowing what it is that they are
saved
from and the extent of it, and they should praise God with all that is
in them,
knowing that, had not God set his everlasting love upon them ,they also
would
be judged with the rest and be condemned. Salvation is of the Lord!
your friend,
Aaron
Aaron,
It seems we may be
getting sidetracked in our
discussion by focusing on the timing of salvation, but this seems
important to
you. I do not deny that salvation is referred to in the past tense in
scripture. However, given the definition we set out in earlier letters,
that
salvation included not only justification, but also adoption,
sanctification,
perseverance, and glorification etc., then it does follow that
salvation is not
only past tense, but also
ongoing in the present, and completed in the future.
I
agree salvation is spoken
of as in the past, often when speaking of forgiveness, justification,
friendship, and perhaps even reconciliation.
(Romans 8:24, Ephesians 2:5,8, Titus 3:5,8).
Salvation is also a continually imparted present work when we speak of
sanctification,
growing emancipation from all evil, growing enrichment in all good, the
enjoyment of eternal life, the experience of the Spirits power,
liberty, and
advancing maturity in conformity to Christ (1 Corinthians 1:18, 15:2, 2
Corinthians 2:5, 6:2, 1 Peter 1:9, 3:21). The salvation of
the soul ( the
mind, will, and emotions) is also an ongoing transformation. Romans
12:2 tells
us to be transformed ( transfigured ) by the renewing of our minds.
James 1:21
tells believers to receive with meekness the engrafted word which is
able to
save your souls. We also read that Christ is able to save to the
uttermost.
Paul writes that he strives toward the mark of the high calling of God,
that he
might attain to the resurrection. There is also a sense in which
salvation is
yet future, particularly when speaking of the redemption of the body,
perfect
christlikeness and final glory ( Romans 5:9-10, 13;11, 1 Corinthians
5:5,
Philippians 1:5-6, 2:12, 1 Thessalonians 5:8, Hebrews 1:14 1 Peter
2:2). Our
salvation is nearer than when we first believed.
All this is widely accepted
Evangelical thought. I
built on this thinking because, given your background, I thought it
would be
something we could agree on.
It seems that the real
difference between us is that
you see a distinct difference between correction and punishment. I view
punishment when coming from a Father to be not just for the sake of
justice,
but also for the purpose of chastisement and correction. You seem to
deny that
God punishes to correct or discipline, but suggest that it is
exclusively for
the purpose of justice. I suggest you do a simple study of the Greek
word
for punishment or chastisement. For example, the Greek word for
punishment is
"kolasis". In Matthew 25:46, "These shall go away into eternal
punishment", the word is "kolasis" meaning "chastisement,
punishment", ( from "A Greek English Lexicon and New Testament
Synonyms", by George Ricker Berry ). Punishment is not just for the
purpose of justice, but also for the purpose of correction. The New
Thayers
Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament defines "kolasis" as
'correction, punishment, penalty'. Correction is remedial, and it is
quite
reasonable to believe that punishment for the ages is for the
correction of the
sinner.It is a linguistically proper understanding of both "aionios"
and "kolasis" to understand "correction for the ages" to be
for the remedy of sin and rebellion in the heart of the unbeliever. To
dogmatically insist that the passage must be interpreted as "eternal
punishment" is not required by the text or the New Testament. There are
many other passages that make it clear that punishment must not be
eternal.
In one of your letters I
believe you suggested that if
are going to do word studies, then we should look at the use of the
word within
the New Testament. I agree that this is the primary source to study.
Sometimes
the text will reveal clues as to nuances of the word. For example,
"aionios" is often translated as eternal in Jude 1:7. It says, Sodom and Gomorrah
are set forth for an example "suffering the vengeance of eternal
fire." This passage indicates that the common definition of time
without
end may not be a good interpretation of "aionios". The aioniou fire
mentioned refers to the fire that destroyed Sodom
and Gomorrah.
The "everlasting" fire they suffered has long since burnt out. Perhaps,
aionios better describes the quality of the fire of God, rather than
time that
it burns. In case you still want to maintain that this fire does refer
to an
everlasting fire, I would like to refer to the only other reference to
this
fire within the letter of Jude. Jude 23 tells us that some should be
saved
"with fear, pulling them out of this fire". If this is referring to
the everlasting fires of hell, ( which I doubt ), then Jude is
instructing
believers to pull the sinners out of hell fire.
The quality of the fire of God is such, though, that it does destroy
all
opposition to himself. However, we are to reach out to help
those who
suffer from the vengeance of this fire.
Another instance where it is
obvious that
"aionios" does not refer to unending time is in John 17:3. Our Lord
gives us a definition of Eternal life. He says, " this is eternal life,
that
they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou
hast
sent." Eternal life is a quality of life, not a quantity or length of
life. Eternal life is life with God. It is the abundant life that Jesus
provides, (John 10:10).
In summary, eternal life is
the life God gives.
Eternal Punishment is the punishment God gives. Oftentimes, we will be
closer
to the truth, if we think of Eternal or "aionios" as a
quality,
rather than a quantity of unlimited time. Just as the "aioniou" fire
that destroyed Sodom
had an end it is also useful to realize that the "eternal"
punishments of God, are limited within time, and also have an end.
You mention that you suspect that I believe that "the second Adam came
to
undo all that the first Adam did and caused". This is not really what I
believe. That is understating what the scripture actually says. Romans
5:15,20
(Amplified) states that "His grace is out of all proportion to the fall
of
man...where sin increased and abounded, grace has surpassed it and has
increased the more and superabounded." As Paul mentioned in another
place,
"I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be
compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us," Romans 8:18).
What
Adam did and caused can not even be compared to what Christ did and
accomplished. Christ destroys the works of the devil, and makes all
things new.
I agree we have passed from death unto life. We possess eternal life.
There is
no condemnation to those in Christ Jesus. When you say that
"no one who Christ died for could possibly go to hell". I
would like to agree.
However, I can not be quite so dogmatic. Your statement does sound
Calvinist. I
agree that God will save anyone for whom Christ died. Thing is, He was
the propitiation
for all men. I think the Arminians got that one right.
Theological systems and creeds can make us more dogmatic than need be.
I like
to let the scriptures speak. Even if someone who once had faith ends up
in the Lake
of Fire
that does not mean he will not be (
is not ) saved. "Once saved always saved" as the saying goes
"yet so as by fire"
as Paul says, ( 1 Corinthians 3:15 ). There are some scriptures that
suggest
that those who have faith could suffer loss. Revelation 2:11 written to
the
angel of the church in Smyrna
says that "he that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death" (
which is the lake of fire, Revelations 20:14 ). Are there
some in the
church that did not overcome? What is to be said of their fate? Are
they hurt
by the lake of fire? Like I said, I would like to agree with you that
once
saved, one could not possibly experience fires of correction, however I
can not
be so dogmatic. Christians like to interpret the scriptures so
that all is
well for them and devastating for those outside. However, we are all in
this
together. Paul wrote to the Jewish Christians in Rome
about sin, "thinkest thou this O
man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that
thou
shalt escape the judgment of God?" (Roman 2:3). Even those for whom
Christ
died are not above the judgment and correction of God.
Continuing on with your objections. You say that the sting on death
remains in
the unbeliever. The sting of death is sin. And yet Christ came destroy
the
works of the devil. Either we believe He was successful or we believe
He
failed. If He failed to take away the sins of the world, then He missed
the
mark set out for Him by God. By definition, missing the mark, failing
is a type
of sin, but I believe my savior was without failure or sin. If you want
to
portray our savior as a failure by your theology that is your
choice,but I
believe he is victorious.
In reference to 1 Corinthians 15 you say Christ is the firstfruits only
of
those who are in the church at his coming. However, I refer you to
James 1:18
that reveals that the church is the firstfruits of all creation. God
has a
process in which the effect of the Gospel spreads through all creation.
All creation waits for the manifestation of the Sons of God. All
creation shall
be liberated from the bondage of corruption, (Romans 8:19,21).
Thanks again for the opportunity to reply to your 3 part letter. My
apologies
for not dealing with every issue you wanted answered. I have attempted
to speak
to those concepts that we have not touched upon. I don't want to be
repetitious
in my handling of the harsher scriptures. I much prefer to focus on the
Gospel.
Like you mention, it is not pleasant to consider everlasting
punishment. It is
even more horrible to consider a creator god who could be so
unforgiving and
full of malice. Would it be so bad if you were wrong? If God was not so
cruel? What
if mercy does triumph over judgment? And God IS love?
What if we didn't have to hold out the threat of Eternal torment? You
suggest
evangelism would be hurt. I suggest that the gospel would be much more
presentable, and Christians would be more open about sharing. The
unbeliever
would certainly be much more willing to listen to the gospel if a gun
was not
held to his temple. ( I refer you to the second letter from Greg on my
web site
)
When I look at Christ I see what God is like. I see a man who loved the
sinners, who chastised the over confident, a God who justifies the
ungodly, and
judges the self-righteous. I hope Christ would be happy with my
attitude toward
sinners.
I hope the message we offer brings hope and not hopelessness.