New flying car breakthrough 2010! Updated May 23, 2012.
How do we know others have not already thought of the A Check Exact Flying Car Design? We see the President and CEOs flying dangerously in helicopters and jets. Low speed aircraft during takeoffs and landings have been risky, ask the pilots. Helicopters decapitate, so of course that is not a feature you want for your family flying car. Helicopters and jets have trouble getting off the ground and landing because the physics are wrong even during flight as shown below.
What's wrong with the picture below?
Death traps should not be the same things as flying machines. Above is shown mismanaged energy, wasted energy, and the results of just plain confusion (no affiliation with "Fail Funnies.com"). In the above, "INDUCED DRAG" is shown which eddy current flows apply to any propeller and in similar pattern contribute to power plant inefficiency. Not detailed concerning blade stabilization to reduce flutter are massive weights! A Check Exact has witnessed others stuck in ruts, chasing their own tails so to speak, trying to invent solutions that others have already solved. A Check Exact extracts pertinent proven successful applications from what others imagine as if non-related. Others have snapped "That has nothing to do with it!", while typically the problem is that they do not want to voluntarily work much harder than previously to properly innovate. Shown above are many ways to kill people.
If their flying vehicle fails at 30' or 80' altitude, what do they expect passengers to do?, use a parachute?, people have said parachutes don't open safely for thousands of feet, or at least 100'. Much depends on the type of parachute and conditions, but in any case can you put a parachute on in time...would you want your child landing in a parachute without training...do they even make reliable parachutes for little children? A single lift prop helicopter is not the most safe thing, and if it fails and falls you might not even want to risk using the parachute near those blades.
Above are shown real problems, people are dying, products are not being delivered, and crop dusters continue to risk their lives as in the olden days much the way airliners operate at airports. Increasingly larger and larger flying vehicles are used dangerously, such as to put towers on top of skyscrapers over cities, and such as to do logging in mountainous terrain amidst towering trees and power lines.
A Check Exact works to reveal not only a current solution, yet rather a flowing series of solutions. Experts, such as at A Check Exact can often help a lot more than asked, especially at the planning stage and also importantly throughout the process even when the process is automated, for instance many want only their specific problem at the moment solved. In other words, they wanted no higher value "series of solutions", so it reasonably costs the business owner and customers more in the long run, if they stay in business. In pattern people want flying things, but relatively don't want to work on thinking about the consequences, that is, their "want" to long term "consequences" ratio is out-of-wack. The innovative / economic mindset is all too often stop-gap-technology which more readily strays and misses the point, more to the point it misses the series of points.
A Check Exact uses long range planning to solve short range problems, such as via Law, ISO, NDT, and such as via affiliated ICCDBB PCS (SM) which already yielded Top Secret proven documented witnessed successes. ICCDBB has provided sermons for decades though now is breaking records by far as measured by the number of visitors with sermons on current applications such as involving Flight / PCS, Future Government Treasury Opportunities, and Helical Reasoning Methodology.
Near ground family vehicles need to be safe.
On television you can see and hear real sales people [not just in comedies] saying "We're crazy! We're practically giving it away!", and some sales people will sell just about anything whether it functions properly or not. Outside magazine (no affiliation unless otherwise stated) points out a critical factor involving many deaths, saying there is "no governing body". Meanwhile A Check Exact continues to proffer PCS [especially Security PCS], since Holy gifts such as living, safety, fairness, justice, and similar are important values for people.
Designers, Engineers, Inspectors, Manufacturers and others have specific areas of expertise that others don't have and current laws can hardly help such experts without opening a can of worms as it is called, which often means if to solve one problem then it creates other problems [or innovates other problems] therefore any innovating to be done needs be done via innovating solutions properly [PCS] rather than innovating problems. Without US Presidential agreement with such experts via one standard guideline, the can of worms effect continues in haphazard patterns. This is not to blame nor insult any President. After all, no law requires a US President to be an expert at anything. Courts have value, but they don't replace loved ones. Insurance has value, but doesn't replace loved ones. PCS is needed, it is vital.
Via optimizing in pertinence, PCS, high tech success patterns can typically be used to help low tech areas, for instance the international electric grid is done according to load balancing. That same load balancing can also be used by other industries such as the cattle industry, such as to help know new sources of feed and where to sell cattle. The electric industry already worked out many very specific details which means the cattle industry has a best way available to accept a flood of applicable inventions (see the A Check Exact Innovations website). Being applicably useful means not applying rocket science to flying cars [nor to cattle nor to the electric industry], rather it means applying only the properly applicable portions. The same is true of banking accountability, government, and other fields of expertise, and since PCS is not law, rather a guideline, there is no requirement, yet rather than roadblocks and despair there is hope. Moreover there is opportunity in PCS that people can opt to improve.
Historically many experts from many aerospace laboratories have started to use goodly innovative reasoning but were prevented from putting it into practice for many various illegal in-house reasons; they have their stories, you can ask them. A Check Exact breakthrough Designer Dr. Bob Benchoff was invited for instance early in his professional career to visit a manufacturer after wheels fell-off their jet over Italy [not shown]. Because of that and similar A Check Exact has always had the attitude to solve before, rather than after-the-fact. That includes the best design before starting to put contraptions together. The Internet has many pics of goofy things being put together. Many lives have accordingly been lost, though the expensive contraptions look pretty before-the-facts.
Don't get it wrong, A Check Exact has nothing against proper usage of parachutes [or other stuff], for instance A Check Exact is thrilled that since 1999 the rocket launched Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (ibid.) emergency safety parachute to solve aircraft failures recently "counted as the 28th CAPS save of 53 survivors" (Cirrus / COPA).
Did you ever see a hot air balloon try to land? Aircraft [and other vehicles (see graph below)] often crash into people or other vehicles, or go sideways into trees, wires, or buildings, they strike mountains and hills, they plunge into valleys crashing into the ground, they destabilize according to how the machinery is constructed pertinent to tailgating forces, down drafts, irregular winds, irregular pavement. Sometimes their wrecks are in series, being dragged along.
Highways are not landing strips (no disrespect to Pilot Instructors intended). And concerning decapitation, putting a cage around the blades just doesn't cut it (see "massive weights" above), as caged portable indoor fans have proven.
We can't afford to lose more people nor expensive aircraft to ignorance. Government needs to get this into proper secure PCS mass production. Government Officials are dying, while none care to use the best reasonable means to change for the better. Not part of some totals are the people that died not from being on board when aircraft crashed, but from having been hit by debris or from other resultant problems.
The United States Department Of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration's Federal National Transportation Safety Board has "Descriptions of more than 140,000 aviation accidents". But if you have your own aircraft such as shown in the pic above to the left, you are less likely to report it if you don't have to. There are also people jumping with parachutes and getting injured, such as in the military with personnel that don't typically whine, and A Check Exact can help overcome such landing problems often tied to critical missions.
"About 21000 airports in the US do not have [Transportation Security Administration, TSA,...]. I use many of them daily." (according to flyertalk.com blog on Practical Travel Safety Issues). Dr. Bob Benchoff has found through experience and education that people are afraid of improvements they don't understand, so that is why the A Check Exact Flying Car Plan is from the start designed to be user friendly. That includes being user friendly to any A Check Exact Flying Car buyer and driver, and includes being user friendly to any government entity, and being user friendly to Security PCS.
Transportation has a catastrophe about to happen according to Scranton Gillette Communications which called it "a perfect storm brewing", and the same is said about obsolete underground structures, old dams, old energy systems, and other antiquated engineering and communications systems according to many sources; which is why Security PCS included the default step by step solution so as not to rock the boat inappropriately, yet for best continuous improvement, meaning that experts in their fields need one best governmental consciousness system for the President, yet for the experts in their fields, that esteemed groups already functioning might be properly heard (reference PCS: Public PCS: "Laws. PCS is explained according to those worthy") so if you want your group to have clout, this is the solution including for President Barack Obama.
Instead of stone tools and cave dwellings, properly together we can agree as to the best system to not only survive, rather to best thrive, reasonably, with excellent feedback not only to vote, yet also that experts have a position vote, not only historic experts, yet also that a mother have a position vote since being the best expert over her child under her legal responsibility hence under her expertise (reference "We the People"). We don't want flying cars that don't have floors attached properly with children falling out, rather we need quick properly organized feedback.
21000 airports is stated above, and not to insult government and rather to properly state the facts to best help government via accordingly offering the best solution: if government can't handle the 21,000 airports, how hardly could it fathom 600 million in the United States [multiple cars per family (flying cars plus road cars) increasingly in the years ahead] as a great banquet of wealth and living, yet there are 7,000,000,000 people now globally that want flying cars, and are ready to buy if they can so afford. The mass system is needed. The mass production is needed. The highest reasonably quality is needed.
Yet with PCS even greater works [(John 14.12) and greater things] will be accomplished. Not because I do it, rather because it will be done [together, yet] via the best pertinent experts for the jobs, with measurable reasonable clout and grace, once approved and properly entered into the PCS System including the PCS Security System once accordingly approved step by step, proper agreeing via proper agreeing [agreement x feedback = continuous improvement (in GodMath terminology)].
The A Check Exact Flying Car Design would help rockets take off, and that's important for instance because we need to mine elsewhere to obtain valuable resources in the future, in other words, we need the PCS System now to plan for future generations. To spend much money now to send machines into space to return with better [machines...] doesn't make a lot of sense to many currently, so we need to properly allocate via proper systematic feedback. Gentle, properly controlled, powerful, change to improve is necessary. Gentleness includes not stepping on toes of others, not pushing aside those unable to fight for themselves, not pushing aside security nor leadership, gentleness means measurable criteria that expert groups have certain clout pertinent to their parameters all too often not properly measured, that is, one government quality standard needs be established for people for protecting rights [already covered by laws] and privileges [to increasingly be covered via PCS] measuring hopes, plans, processes, manufacturing results, implementation, and with continuous best feedback [via best agreement system]. Bank Bill Of Rights, business Bill Of Rights, manufacturer Bill Of Rights, government workers Bill Of Rights, Congress Members Bill Of Rights, group Bill Of Rights, family Bill Of Rights, computer Bill Of Rights [for instance as they increasingly think for themselves for mutual benefit], and so forth are needed for us, for the President, and for the Lord of United States Constitution Article 7.
Low speeds, takeoffs, and landings used to be risky, ask the pilots, yet now A Check Exact has a better more safe way to fly: the A Check Exact Flying Car Design. Picture a car shaped helicopter only more powerful, more accurate, without those long nearly invisible blades and better overall including no decapitation.
A person or group can misinterpret the laws of physics (and/or similar, see linked example on SEC decision), though the laws of physics don't lie.
Here is a new A Check Exact Flying Car site illustrating some of many aspects of conventional reasoning and independently proven methodologies as to why other flying car designers are heading in the wrong direction, including the United States safety reasoning and push to thwart such dangerous trial-and-error ideas even when facing external war and invasion: The new A Check Exact Flying Car design offers many safe solutions.
Concerning popular funding reasons for the potential to have flying cars, here are some of the physics:
There is a reason propeller blades are long and not short.
Similarly there is a reason wings are large and not small.
There are reasons not to use wing slits, see previous link illustration.
Balloons and sails are full of hot air when it comes to launching and landing family flying cars.
Balloons on long string delivery systems yield dangerously tangled situations.
Popped balloons and tanks of gases lose power far too quickly.
Bouncing balls and pogo sticks have hardly shown much promise.
Kites pulled by oxen showed promise, but better solutions seem available.
Bats technology is similar in pattern to bird technology using too much fuel.
Evidence supports that kings rode condors over Nazca, Peru, but the condors didn't like it.
Air is soup to hummingbirds and bugs at great fuel inefficiency relative to flying family cars.
Strapping on a jetpack is energy inefficient and not a safe flying car plan.
To launch from an incline cable car, train,...or to jettison is not a family home device.
There is a reason ion propulsion plugged into a home 110V outlet may only lift a small piece of aluminum.
Gliders, autogiros, and pedaling a balloon bike have limited power vulnerable to cross winds.
There is a reason catapults and rubber or spring slingshots and bows are not even used to move cargo.
Also there is a reason rocket fuels are expensive and not sold locally.
To sit on a powder keg or place a bucket on a firecracker is a one way trip.
Lives are risked if to wait for the God Of Nature or Mother Nature to move you off the ground (Numbers 26.10).
The human cannonball historically has trouble hitting the net.
To use an initial pulse, waves and/or particles has applications along with problems per application.
Jet turbo-engines are simply fancy short blade propellers (see above, and reference power generation / pics link below).
Beaming power to aircraft unleashes a flood of dangerous powers [NAVSEA (Naval Sea Systems Command)]. If government hasn't coordinated, invite God (reference PCS).
Slow speed when starting and stopping makes problems for the Harrier and others,
while the physics of the first pic shown below,
is that jet wash goes from the front engines into the rear engines!
Further concerning the top left pic, jet wash is turbulent [relative to smoother wing tip vortices (see top illustration on this page)], though even to turn the engines some could still have front engines sucking air from the rear intakes [(reference Summer Rental sailboat race concerning the line "stole our wind!") though the boat positions were moot per se]. Not heeding PCS (Matthew 10.29) tends toward making mistakes (3 Nephi 21.21) similar in pattern to not hearing [(GodMath) walking and/or flying in proper Faith/Hearing/Word], while observing PCS tends toward appropriate flying car power (3 Nephi 20.22 and 21.29). Regarding parachutes, "Strap it on your back kids and let's go", is not the same as "Buckle up"; even on a ladder law requires three, 3, points of contact. The above 3 prop [4 similarly] does not impress in terms of functionality, by the way air is 3D not 2D. Flying cars need to protect against side winds. The above right is not a flying car, it is a plane with folding wings. When thinking about how to build a flying car, via PCS prioritization more important than getting from point A to point B (see below), it helps to think of flying cars as proper family vehicles that would be best at homes safely taking off and landing. As shown above none come close to meeting that description, at least in the opinion of A Check Exact.
Don't miss the point, in true physics there is a lovely flow from one technology to the next.
In flying car physics, just say no to propeller blades.
In flying car physics, just say no to wings.
In flying car physics, just say no to wing slits that increase wing weight and interfere with flexibility dynamics.
In flying car physics, just say no to any inappropriate fluid dynamics.
In flying car physics, just say no to unsafe practices and energy problems concerning mass transit.
In flying car physics, just say no to the slingshot effect at dangerously high speeds.
In flying car physics, just say no to overly complex things with many parts that can fail.
In flying car physics, just say no to jetpack mini rocket technology with expensive fuel.
In flying car physics, just say no to 110VAC ion propulsion electrical hazards.
In flying car physics, just say no to catapults.
In flying car physics, just say no to rockets.
In flying car physics, just say no to beaming power to aircraft.
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to those small propellers, even if they come with molded material and a nice paint job to look cool....
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to giant condor wings, just say no to tiny hummingbird wings even though they can be used in an array because of fuel cost and also because extra parts especially moving parts mean extra possibilities of failures [(also reference nuclear backup systems) in need of PCS (see below)]. A Check Exact studied many birds a long time, also understanding tiny wings have value, but first things first [1. praise the Lord such as for the wisdom concerning enlightenment for power safety and security and 2. PCS (see below)].
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to things that don't apply to flying cars.
There are emergency considerations not disclosed here, though here is some info about air resistance and how long a person is able to wait before opening a parachute (click for info with interesting ball in air series pic).
Cars have head restraints behind passengers, and NASA tests people to see if they can withstand extreme G-forces [note, Bob Benchoff of A Check Exact, the Flying Car designer, served for instance as the final approval of the world's fastest highest roller coaster Magnum XL200 prior to testing the most G-forces on a public ride (Guinness Book Of Records 1991 pic page 92) then he took his crew and rode repeatedly for free / while being paid, praise the Lord, amid much NRC interest]. People are frail. Machines can whip about and change directions far faster than people can blink, so we need user friendly technologies rather than technologies prone to possibly cause injuries; we need blessed long term planning solutions rather than cutting corners repeatedly; and we need safe rather than sorry. Whips, catapults, slingshots, snap-quick-electromagnetic-launch-pads, giant mousetrap spring jolts, and other in pattern just don't cut it.
Jetpack or Flying Wing technology has historically often been dangerous, with expensive hard to find fuel, though progress is being made. The news just reported someone flying over the Alps using a jetpack, and while it is progress, it is important to remember people using that and similar technologies have crashed into cliff faces due to being unable to overcome sudden near ground surface effects / drafts (reference A Check Exact archived illustrations you might have, previously posted on this site). It is important to understand that jetpack users while possibly licensed pilots and likely athletic and highly skilled, can hardly compete with bats and birds in terms of visual acuity, reaction speed, durability, reliability, and such while trying to remember how to operate the machine even if very user friendly [reference VGC Foundation book provided to government covering NASA CREW biopsychology and biocybernetics in part, no affiliation unless otherwise stated though Benchoff of A Check Exact also presides over VGC Foundation], for instance if suddenly approaching wires, an antenna, or perhaps a swarm of bugs or flock of birds, and in pattern similar to that if motorcycles are dangerous, reasonably jetpacks are more dangerous since relative to flying cars the motorcycles can powerfully grab the road somewhat while things that fly such as from 0 to 100 MPH as if grab a cushion of air hence have not been powerfully quick to respond as tried under former technologies.
Larger jet-mobiles if made do or would require many of the sensing devices, automatic controls, standardized traffic route coordination, and much more that A Check Exact has been explaining for over a year. Another factor is the jetpack fuel cost effectiveness in terms of physics not discussed here for relative pattern security reasons, rather the proper solution is simply eloquent and the physics of it can be used to weigh, as a family flying car default standard, the physics of other devices.
In nature you can observe a hummingbird for instance, especially if you have a hummingbird feeder with a solution of water with 10% sugar, in other words, a high sugar fuel diet. A Check Exact made a [model or] technique to improve over the way birds fly, and it was energized by stationary 110VAC for testing power value only, to see if the theory could be done with acceptable results, but even if to have an efficient mobile power source and an array of artificial hummingbirds or drone bugs that technology is far from the actual A Check Exact Flying Car Design technology which has been reasoned as being far superior.
Dr. Bob Benchoff had discussions with a Peruvian expert in the United States very knowledgeable about condors and the Nasca lines. The condors in Peru are much larger than those in the United States and have taken calves and there are stories of them flying away with children. That evidence led Dr. Benchoff to believe that the Nasca lines are likely a result of Peruvian kings harnessing condors in pattern similar to chariots, and getting their people involved similar in pattern to amusement theme parks, likely tied to religious and governmental patterns.
Concerning some popular applications that have been or are being tried, jets with tiny blades [relative to a helicopter] are not pertinent to flying cars, though jet, Cruise Missile, and other rocket pressure barrier studies hold potential for some largely military applications though generally dangerously at very high energy costs currently.
Rocket powered cars break speed records but have trouble going slowly, and don't start easily without burning down the family house, and in similar pattern it is important to be mindful of any dangerously lethal fumes that jetpacks might exhaust as a risk to the pilot and others. Benchoff for instance used to be required to use the jetpack fuel carcinogenic ingredient perchlorate which is an acidic highly reactive and lethal to breathe. Some people want to use liquid ozone (O3), ClF3, and ClF5, all of which are unstable, energetic, and toxic (Wiki).
Families can ride bicycles but have trouble going as fast as 10 miles per hour, much less pushing it at a whopping 14 miles per hour, hardly keeping pace with a car on nearly any road. Yet PCS Methodology shows a gap between the bicycle and the rocket car. Experts can put car tires on bicycles so the tires don't rip apart if a bicycle can somehow be pedaled 55MPH, and experts can put a parachute behind a rocket; but they're missing the point. In the gap is stuff such as the motorcycle, also in the gap are regular cars, trains, and a lot of other reasonable stuff. The A Check Exact Flying Car is just that, one of those "stuff" things.
Beaming lasers and waves to power aircraft is hardly like low power signaling satellites. Years ago at the advent of pico satellites Dr. Bob Benchoff [of earned 250-1500, 2132, and NAVSEA certifications such as used to control projects of Trident nuclear submarines and Cruise Missiles] posted illustrated details on the Internet of how in one example a laser would burn the air under the pico satellites to cause them to rise to the outer atmosphere. There are many other similar pattern ways to lift things such as for military applications, but there are extreme dangers not merely from heat. Consider the increase of blinded pilots. Consider the huge increase in power needed proportional to the distance (see above NAVSEA link) compounded by the number of flying cars in mass transit not only now but in the future.
Experts in virtually all fields, together prove independent tests, such as proven of the ability of air to flow into a crack according to Radon Testing Methodology. An MT-L3 expert knows how to increase or reduce magnetic layers, while a cook for instance knows how to add bubbles to food or remove bubbles, also pictures and illustrations of physics shows properties of bubbles [and eddy currents] such as bubbles automatically arranging themselves, so arranging is already done for us and we simply need apply such things to flying cars, and we need to not apply things that are not appropriate per se.
For your sakes, to help enlighten, often solutions are very simple and elegant such as A Check Exact affiliate ICCDBB freely provides, see below. Experts report Cruise Missiles fired from submarines stay dry, and other experts report the Moon also stays dry. Flight experts are great, such as using computational fluid dynamics, and their help properly working together is strongly preferred with the key point being "properly", in other words rightly prioritized useful methodology (see "How do we know" above).
"Historically, the most dangerous part of a lawmaker's job has been not violence, but travel. At least 29 members of Congress have died in accidents involving planes, automobiles and ships." (The Washington Post 1/16/11).
"Independent tally shows increase in air crash death toll" from 598 in 2008 to 766 in 2009 [(Europe News 1/11/11) about USA]. Though in 2010 in USA according to the FAA there was a great improvement to only 263 deaths, but far from perfect.
Many for instance have said that adding more energy would be too much for the materials to handle, the materials would break and fly apart. In other words, people that say such things express their own ignorance. They don't know, so instead of admitting they don't know how it's possible they say things that don't apply to what A Check Exact does. A Check Exact offers real solutions, not barriers against reasoning.
Giving our previous A Check Exact Customers the first opportunity years ago to take advantage of this newly innovated technology (see "Newsletters with pics" below) and then offering this to US Government, and the general public, none have thus far expressed any interest as witnessed by A Check Exact, and if we can't get these safety issues properly accomplished, A Check Exact can hardly offer it's more complex values.
As seen for instance on the news 9/29/2010 a New York Police helicopter fell into the water, and another airliner crashed onto the runway. Also people out of their garages are building accidents-waiting-to-happen.
$200 million is required to purchase a typical modern jetliner such as the Concorde, which has to go over 225MPH to properly takeoff or it may crash according to AerospaceWeb.org. If it crashes there is the disruption of service to other flyers, the investigating costs, the insurance, there are the lawsuits, and there is otherwise the enormous burden to families and friends due to losses of loved ones, including executives traveling on huge value business trips. Investigations are not only about malfunctions, they are also ongoing with searching for patterns such as tied to major business global acquisitions, and as tied to military workings of various nations.
Former model of efficiency.
Manufacturers producing rockets, jets, planes, and other vehicles, along with businesses needing to transport heavy loads at moderate speeds, need to become aware that technologies such as the car fan shown above are no longer state-of-the-art (reference ages old "vortex wind funnels" and Fresnel wind lenses). Because historic technology has become obsolete, every business today would benefit from the A Check Exact breakthrough, not only directly yet also as with leadership for security, and improved processing.
An advance copy of Discover magazine (April 2012, received in the beginning of March) has a full page pic of a wind tunnel with notes on page 8, for testing "SPACESHIPS" [Center Italian Research Aerospace, CIRA (located in Southern Italy)]. The new A Check Exact Flying Car technology would greatly improve this and other wind tunnel technologies, multiplying power, control, precision, and quality.
In similar pattern and concern garage doors on the sides of skyscrapers are discussed with new pics (see the link for "how your new Flying Car would look" below).
As already discussed by A Check Exact pilots understand something known as "ground effect" along with microburst, the point being that a change in air pressure as with the opening of a garage on the side of a skyscraper can act as a wind tunnel, so proper safety designing before-the-fact needs be in place (2 Chronicles 35.4).
Instead of moving laterally on the ground at dangerously high speed to takeoff faster than family cars, there is another solution. Instead of a meat ripping food blender turned inside out, called a helicopter, there is a better solution. There is a solution that enables 0 [zero] to 1MPH, to 2MPH,...to 35MPH...to 55, 105, and so on up to full regular aircraft speed, filling the gaps between liftoffs and landings, yet the A Check Exact Design also allows for forward, reverse, and reasonably quick sideward lateral linear movements as well as dynamic vector movements including circular and helical increasing safety value for overcoming of a tailspin (Isaiah 19.1).
The Main Cause Of Commercial Airline Accidents Is Lack Of Proper Change:
The new safer technology is available, government only has to use it.
Many experts pretend it has nothing to do with their job, but safety is everyone's business. Many experts are stuck in the rut of complaining such as the material will break and fly apart if we spin it any faster, but that is just simply another excuse. Similarly many lazily quit thinking, claiming somebody else already thought of it. The many people use the word "impossible" which is not part of the definition of the word "innovation". In the global and universal system there are disconnects. There are banks with personnel that feel disconnected to the parts of banking that applies, such as Banker Officers flying in jets at dangerously low speeds at airports where there is the most congested air and land traffic. The same unaccountability applies. Perhaps strangely, too, the aerospace industry evidently has the same disconnect as aerospace experts clearly know of the problems of slow airport speeds where the congestion is highest (see "Presidents flying in helicopters" above).
Not only to aerospace experts, accountability applies to all experts in all fields; consider chemistry polymers for example. Almost certainly you are looking at a polymer computer system, with polymer electrical lines, polymer office equipment, perhaps polymer lamps, blinds, drapes, desk, chair, carpeting and walls. You have polymer packaged food, possibly polymer delivered air and water. Soldiers were dying from trench foot which polymers largely solved, with modern polymers letting air breathe while keeping water out (reference osmosis and pertinent green energy). High density polymers offer thread fibers, low density polymers offer waterproofing and firefighter protection used on aircraft carriers. Nobody wanted polymers according to history. Phillips Petroleum Company could hardly sell the polymer idea until 1958 with the advent of the Hula Hoop and this the point of this discussion, you have to want safe low-priced valuable beneficial flying cars more than you want Hula Hoops. Thinking is not enough [save prayer (and measurably reference PCS and NASA CREW biocybernetics/biopsychology)], make your thinking of flying cars properly known (see contacting President Obama discussion below). Today A Check Exact can draw a design for a little flying car toy, and perhaps you would see it on TV in time for Christmas. But let's not be stupid. On the other hand if security doesn't want flying cars, A Check Exact is hardly in the position to force each and every security entity globally to it's best to do it's job to protect the President, and that goes for all Presidents, CEOs, Officers, Experts, and the General Public.
President Barack Obama is reasonable, but he sees a frustratingly depressed unmotivated public facing poverty, he's just too polite to say it. While the whole time this A Check Exact Flying Car Methodology alone for example would skyrocket the US economy and US leadership by example unto other nations to follow.
A special thanks goes to leaders such as Stephen Colbert of the Colbert Report [interpreted in leadership pattern as a sword for justice and greater (Genesis 3.24)] yesterday speaking of and showing a picture of a flying drone and that technology, the day before showing new [weird] aircraft designs, and the day prior shown many types of aircraft and being anxious for flying cars. NASA has done similar, often the weirder the more. Yet the best solutions are less about weirdness and rather of beauty, bringing together the puzzle sections properly to reveal the bigger previously incomplete unseen picture, the higher previously unseen value.
A Check Exact offers you the following link to a website with a great new look in perspectives of family dwellings, businesses, and power for utilities, with pics and illustrations:
Want to see how your new Flying Car would look:
The above link again in 2012 receives further verification in proof in part of the value(s) of PCS and the A Check Exact Methodical reasoning of independently proven proofs; this time the proof [or counted as such (see linked site for details)] comes from Discover magazine. The linked site also has new added features illustrated, though the illustrations are more toward the traditional, than toward disclosing secretive proprietary features in an effort to not confuse the general public, while maintaining the importance of security information keep on a need to know basis (reference Public PCS Laws Section). Look into the Flying Cars future with sound reasons provided, along with a practical power plants energy solution for increasing energy efficiency, with the above linked site newly updated to help you understand electromagnetism [Magnetism Periodic Table (newly updated)] and the strongest forces in the known Universe.
People often fear unselfishness. Because of that, for others opportunity exists.
People also fear eddy currents, able to sweep people off their feet unexpectedly [or rather let us properly reason what might be expected]. Consider a leaf rising in the air. Heat rises from the ground, though most wind comes at us sideways as the wind moves around the planet. So the rising leaf is often rising due to a bend in the air lift-time continuum or a bubble lift as the way a bubble forms on the paint of a car (no affiliation with linked Sinapore Airshow). The bend or eddy current bubble swirl raises the leaf so the leaf falls to it's momentary resting place(s) higher in the air as it rises. In worldly terms, from gravity and sideways forces can come lift.
People also fear the Lord. The above "pics" link also has a link on how to raise your abilities, such as to innovate better designs, such as concerning Flying Cars, Power, and IQ, and not merely of talk in self promotion, rather in proven methodology, expertise, and leadership, with problem solving and higher values as never seen before: for your sake in witness A Check Exact for instance has some such values not seen by others, and you are free to report back to A Check Exact as other experts have (typical Feedback / Benchmarks are found archived as linked in the following Section under the next illustration), yet progress is made better innovating increasingly.
People are evidently afraid in terms of safety and risk, when they lack PCS. You can travel outside and find a million different opinions, yet there is only one best opinion. There is only one best Methodology to determine the best opinion to reach.
People fear heights, such as roof tops, ladders, and so on. Flying represents past experiences of falling down and being injured, and hearing of people being killed, just look at the crashes at the top of this page. People don't want guesswork, people want credible Flying Car Methodology [even if they don't know the right words], and that Flying Car Methodology [with many techniques for specific applications] is included under the PCS Methodology of A Check Exact.
Some people fear too much boredom, it drives them nuts. Normal people at times find boredom a pleasant break from the hectic pace. A Check Exact Flying Car Methodology may likely as evidenced be feared or ignored because it is so boring, much the way a building on fire is solved to become no longer a threat; yet look at the result, instead of deconstruction, helpful useful construction as never before!
What makes A Check Exact so special?
Best of the best long range planning: Jesus Christ.
A Check Exact Proprietary PCS and A Check Exact Security PCS [in cooperation with ICCDBB (Public PCS including new "Applied PCS" 4/22/2012) united in a checks and balances system] continues after years, to see governments and big businesses investing heavily in obsolete technologies that are far more costly / less efficient than A Check Exact solutions even though A Check Exact has helped such pertinent experts, even though A Check Exact has proven to such experts pertinent A Check Exact credibility such as solving their top Engineer's toughest problems for them, even though A Check Exact has worked within the system such as to use the frequently malfunctioning online C.A.G.E. System under control of those who don't fix it after problems have been explained [at least in A Check Exact experiences], and even though for years now A Check Exact as an expert entity as federal government after closely scrutinizing has verified within Federal Clearance Status, A Check Exact has continued offering security solutions that they don't want to know nor hear about for their own protection(!) nor for the better protection of their own families(!) nor for the protection of the President(!), much less to hear about having flying cars!
The more A Check Exact checks on regulations, specifications, and drawing details on TV, online elsewhere, in newspapers and magazines, the more year after year A Check Exact is convinced that the solution(s) are here, not elsewhere; not all solutions, just some of the most important ones [remove the veil (Exodus 34.34) at appropriate times (see Public PCS on "measurably") in pattern of a mental circumcision (Genesis 34.15) to best enable the latest best way to best innovate Romans 7.6) yet the best is hardly A Check Exact alone, rather united with innovative expertise talents among others, talents others have that are more likely ineffective if not properly united]. A Check Exact would rather say "Well done my good and faithful fellow experts!" (Luke 19.17 and John 15.15)! Even so, it is hoped the God of nature [and/or forces of nature (according to your preference)] will bless you mightily accordingly (Matthew 10.41).
Above on this site have been discussed problematic situations caused by others such as Pilots and experts, yet A Check Exact would be proud to hire each and everyone of such people not only because of PCS / Jesus Christ, yet also because at least they are trying relative to so many others selfishly busy protecting their own cushy jobs. The experts are innovating (Exodus 35:10), at least that's something [even if not Christian (Luke 14:13)]; and the Pilots are trying to survive each day (John 15:13).
Jesus Christ taught, such as how to increase values, and that accordingly is the A Check Exact PCS Methodology (Luke 8:10). As with any Methodology, a Methodology is an indicator (see "provided" below). The Scientific Method has a value. Yet in terms of improved or optimum innovative designing and testing as A Check Exact does, a Testing Methodology is of greater value.
A Check Exact has started it's own new Innovations website A Check Exact News Headlines 2012 with Pics and Illustrations, functioning together with the A Check Exact Newsletters website linked at the bottom of this page. While the A Check Exact Newsletters website offers mainly text some years and often in hindsight recapping our great achievements news, this new Innovations website offers more in terms of visualizing the future within proven methodology or at least as normal to the industry and/or situations, also as they say a picture speaks a thousand words.
Testing Methodology PCS is in it's infancy, as are many other Testing Methodologies, yet these are toward proofs on the one hand, while on the other hand case by case studies are toward stop gap efforts similar to how the Scientific Method often varies from business to business instead of being appropriate to be utilized throughout the industry as a guideline similar to law yet often with specifics in detail such as the law of AWS specific to revealing processing cracks via Magnetic Particle Testing by proven qualified personnel. Some businesses for instance use guess analyses such as to chemically determine the strongest best formula for their application, and that is a respectable pattern, yet rather when able the higher priority of reasoning is to be used, hence became clear the motivational need to have PCS, to have better and rather best control as much as reasonable for pertinent experts to use rather than guesswork. Being able to prove is not the same as being able to repeat the results (reference Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle and some aspects of Penetrant Testing).
Typically the other labs [our competition, except we use the Demming Win Win / Golden Rule Philosophy and often oversee other labs though that "competition" has never overseen us] often have guests, along with random visitors, so in other words as we've witnessed, other labs reveal much proprietary information to other people. Government officials and others normally see many items "on the floor" as it's called, and in machines being tested, though belonging not to government per se, but belonging to private free enterprise businesses hence their proprietary information is revealed by many other labs. For instance at another lab which claimed the lab was secure, a person walked in off the street at night and looked around. Such labs typically try a little to conceal things if situations reasonably allow, but those places are no place to keep secrets.
A Check Exact labs was designed from the start to have no such problem. We can see much of what they see, but they don't see our proprietary customer information, much less government secret info. We have undergone visits and audits, and have never revealed any such thing, normally revealed by typical other labs.
A Check Exact has provided President Barack Obama with key PCS security advantage designs and documents that of proven default no competition would be aware legally (save Executive Privilege). In other words A Check Exact is in tune with Executive Privilege, as any true leader in their field would be.
Imagine your job of being invited by your competitors to walk into their secured facilities and see their secret plans, along with seeing what their customers are trying. A Check Exact business design does not have certain huge security problems the competition typically has.
Strangers, whether invited or not, often walk into the labs of the competition, snooping around. We have seen many industrial testing labs having no security as strangers walk right in through open garage doors and see the research being conducted on foods, NASA equipment, nuclear devices, and so on. It is also easy to be invited into competitor labs such as on ASNT tours, by being a salesperson, or such as by making a surprise Audit, as the competition is largely vulnerable, placing their customers' secrets at risk.
A Check Exact investigates and finds things that other labs and government are not legally allowed to see (without court order).
A Check Exact sees secrets of many businesses, laboratories, and governments! A Check Exact has legally employed Government Judges (see our main site and links for details), something perhaps unique to A Check Exact in the materials testing laboratories market sector. A Check Exact has many unique values (ibid.).
Labs that offer field services have a great advantage over other types of businesses, when it comes to becoming the best of the best in state-of-the-art designing per proven methodologies, for instance pertinent to flying cars. We visit their factories and the factories of their competitors, so we see many of the greatest ideas of each. Because of this unusual advantage, A Check Exact can more readily have current leadership over many types of processes and systems, especially when self motivated and focused on a specific product, such as the flying car.
While businesses don't want others to see what they're doing, they make exceptions for certain types of consulting, often revealing some of their most private and secure matters at the onset, in proprietary trust.
Many Inspectors working for the competition only do as required, and such is legal. In fact there are times to do nothing except as required, such as for safety reasons. A Check Exact prefers to do more to help when appropriate, so customers are often more anxious to have A Check Exact visit again, rather than some other lab (click here to read what others have said about A Check Exact and to read all the feedback forms).
Here is a little background about lead Designer Dr. Bob Benchoff, formerly an Aerospace / Nuclear Designing Engineer (though laws have changed concerning Doctors and Engineers) for various companies such as for clients NASA and the Navy. He has led increasingly in innovative design technology standardizing it into one PCS(SM) methodology, with proven success via setting standards for overlapping engineering drawings the way geophysicists have overlapped maps to reveal vital correlations. A 1972 graduate interested in science pertaining to humans, Social Sciences, prior to such at least in part being known as the QA field (1973 Wiki), his studies have been ongoing. He has recently worked for Tech USA Aerospace, Defense, Engineering, Information Technology, Power, Energy, and Scientific, A Check Exact, and Government as a Chief Justice. Prior to that he worked for the Herron (sold when Benchoff left the company) Fokker Stork Aerospace Technical group as their Certified Internal Auditor, a Safety Coordinator including over various Radiation Safety Officers, conducted ASNT and AWS tours and training, and held many other key positions.
Dr. Bob Benchoff, Level III, CJ, has endured sufferings in patterns similar to how other experts have suffered. For instance Dr. Bob Benchoff used to work for global employers in which all employees, except for some of the office people, were Engineers; but then the laws changed so that people were no longer called Engineers unless they paid government with due process [including exams (of faith, reference PCS)] in evident violation of US Constitution Article 1 Section 9. In similar pattern such happened concerning education and other fields. PCS can help people best solve such issues, that is, some things have many variable contingencies, while other things have few contingencies [some of which become law (reference the AWS codification into law)] so PCS is most immediately applicable to such "few" which then leverage "many" in Demming Golden Rule pattern applicable to flying car design: power needed to hold a car in the air 10' above a driveway and then build the machine to do it, rather than build a machine and then upgrade: from plan to solution, more than from solution to innovation, aside from continuous improvement praise the Lord (reference from glory to higher glory in Public PCS).
Some of the most important suffering experts have endured is about money. Experts have been fired with non-experts taking their places for less pay, with results independently witnessed as lower value, sometimes quickly [names withheld].
If anyone with financial ability wants to propose how A Check Exact can disclose the flying car and power design without A Check Exact being cut out of the deal, let A Check Exact know.
It's not just the money, it's also safety and PCS. Copyrights and patents are hardly any solution(s) A Check Exact seeks since US soldiers and businesses don't others knowing our technological advantage published online (search term: patents). Dr. Bob Benchoff often met with an international patent expert (see Newsletters at the bottom of this page) that explained how simple it was at least for her to quickly get all the patent details, which is good for those who abide in the law, but dangerous in the hands of terrorists. US Federal Government in 2012 tried to ameliorate the problem, though the right way according to default is via PCS (see below).
A Check Exact loves others including experts, though for your enlightenment this is stated: we witness our competition as if toddlers fumbling along chasing shadows as compared to what A Check Exact has achieved, last year, praise the Lord. A Check Exact appreciates experts, and if they saw A Check Exact make a presentation it would hardly be anything other than a delightful aha moment for them.
A Check Exact typically interfaces directly with CEOs, Owners, General Managers, Quality Assurance Managers, Government Agents, and similar, such as about designing and budget planning, along with establishing process systems when contracts from bids are received including instructing personnel on the floor and directly overseeing their involvement.
Governments, such as US Federal [clearance info not disclosed], use A Check Exact which opts to use proven PCS to solve and to verify as discussed above, even though US Federal leadership does not yet require others to use PCS Quality Assurance. A Check Exact has had to take over where other labs have failed. Negligence can be a legal concern, though A Check Exact prefers to lead by example such as via mailing helpful information to US Presidents.
The first A Check Exact customer already knew of the acclaim and asked for consultation on aerospace magnetic direction matters seeking better guidance that airport technology typically provides, and since then has had A Check Exact provide demagnetization, magnetization, ultrasonics, and other per A Check Exact criteria as the customer moved from a local business to international, including now doing business in all 50 states selling some of the largest heaviest products.
Started in 1993 A Check Exact provides innovative design guidance for industry, via proven methodology with far reaching applications, such as the circa 9/11 designs and testing for electrical grid equipment manufacturers that were used to better control electrical power in New York yet for a permanent solution nationally and internationally (see Newsletter link below), and such as bullet protection physical designs and the Flying Car items and systems yet to be used though unraveled in 2010.
About A Check Exact and PCS (see top of page) innovative designs prioritized optimum problem solving: concerning a pattern of innovation of the wheel with innovation of the car, if the wheel is innovated first [such as for a bike or cart for people (including the Lord as required for PCS compliance, ibid.)] then it is hard to innovate a car, yet if a car is innovated first it is easy (praise the Lord / ibid.) to innovate a wheel [by default it has already been innovated]; that same pattern applies to all things relative in the known Universe, thanks be to Jesus Christ (ibid.). Hence rather than try to figure how to build an innovation, have A Check Exact investigate the solution(s) already available, proven, and current hence already optimized as the best solution hence the default best solution [reference many Bible verses including pertinent to law (ibid.) and therefore leadership in security including A Check Exact security and government security hence not detailed here], of the A Check Exact / PCS solving pattern. In other words, if we have a modern car, we already know not only about how to invent a wheel, yet also we know of what material it is to be made and what model and size tire, and what tread we prefer. Similarly if you know the number 5 (spare tire), you already know the number 4. Similarly if you know power conversion, you already know power, praise the Lord.
Legal note: With this Plan A Check Exact does not declassify nor leak any federal classified information, and A Check Exact divulges no proprietary Customer information including secret processes info. Only publicly available proven methodologies are divulged with illustrations of pertinence.
Many A Check Exact Customers conduct research, some of which A Check Exact controls such as pertinent to aerospace limits, and such as doing power plant prototype testing. Yet to be clear, while some A Check Exact Customers do research, A Check Exact itself is not a research entity. A Check Exact designs, authors, publishes and therein establishes criteria, programs, procedures, parameters, and methodologies over Clients as pertinent per law and normal to the industry, save to pre-agreed criteria if applicable [conditions apply].
A Check Exact does not divulge certain types of information. In example a big business A Check Exact Customer asked for our Prospectus, though we do not provide such. In the real world sense in example we caught a spy evidently or allegedly of China [in Atlanta, GA] trying to get our info and that of one of our top aerospace Customers. In a similar case we have repeatedly caught another lab illegally spying on us without them knowing of having been automatically revealed via a simple gadget. If you don't see info on the Internet, then we are not likely to disclose it otherwise to you [see our Main Site on quotes, security, and on non-solicitation]. If you are already a Customer then A Check Exact functions normal to industry and legally as described above.
Transmission Breakthrough: A Check Exact just made another design breakthrough solution! See the A Check Exact Main Site Schedule Of Events. One crazy aspect of obsolete drive train [automatic] transmission technology including starters and [manual] clutches, has all too often been reliance on friction, when we are supposed to be relying on the opposite [(PCS: 1 Timothy 6.5 yet with Romans 13.2 and 2 Chronicles 9.14), also applicable to electrical resistors]. To try to idle or run the engine at high speed while putting on the friction brakes resisting the flow of power makes little sense including in Green Energy terms.
People have had troubles with transmissions. Historically they have been costly to build and repair, they have many moving parts, and there are other problems, yet A Check Exact using PCS just came through with a solution guided from above, yet already of patterns of proven methodologies as the update toward the bottom of this linked site discusses along with a solution concerning new transmission understandings. Power redistribution without the former problems and within the PCS patterns indicator including flow of patterns [(the above site has a link to the pertinent PCS illustration) with missing link details (and see "stop gap" above)]; solution comes in part from the A Check Exact PAIUS design which was half funded by A Check Exact Level III Mike Thomas (retired or semiretired) who donated the completed in full, thanks Mike, and it was witnessed in parts accordingly by other experts.
The above illustration of the A Check Exact Flying Car Design Plan explains the PCS, in pattern similar to how Genesis prophetically explains the Bible to a measurable extent; in that the Plan including Proven Methodology hence including security, is a default agreement system, that is, to have the best proper pertinent Proven Methodology is chosen by default, lest by default an ancillary, subordinate, inferior or similarly a less valuable pattern be tried. In NDT terms, it is properly best by default lest it be contaminated. So if security is not free of contamination, A Check Exact needs help to improve federal security to achieve the Plan Agreement Default, to bring security up to standard. According to Edward Demming and the Golden Rule it means to remove security problems they already have, per se; then to reach a new better accord, in this case flying security vehicles according to their acceptance since A Check Exact has already coordinated and has been accordingly designing of proven methodology [proven by other pertinent experts as a minimum, per field of expertise] and has already accepted the A Check Exact designing. Hence Head of Security President Barack Obama only needs agree [concerning to be responsible over people, security gates, instruments, and equipment (Numbers 4.26)], if that is what this President thinks this President should do.
Also in the above illustration of the A Check Exact Flying Car Design Plan is explained that "Top Inspectors" can know things the other people do not comprehend as affiliated ICCDBB further explained "Laws. PCS is explained according to those worthy to receive."
So other unaffiliated labs that have "Top Inspectors" or similar able to accordingly access as described above in the illustration should be able to do as A Check Exact has done except due to partitions, Ivory Towers, thresholds, barriers, clearances, and so on. For example some experts in the arts have stated that virtually all creativity ends in school in first or second grade, and to consider whether this is true or not [measurably (referencing PCS)], consider that for instance Dr. Bob Benchoff when a young student much wanted to design new helpful great things, but education less said do so, and instead education said "Repeat what I say." [history (Luke 9.60) instead of continuously improving].
GodMath Testament explains the detailed measurably parameters of Absolutivity including Relativity, accordingly utilizing proven defaults achieved in accord PCS enables usefulness best via not only learning [lest you be unawares (Luke 21.34 including King James Version)] yet also with learning the learning to improve the higher proven learning methodology(ies) lest to learn the obsolete increasingly. In other words, if to show Engineers artworks of flying cars, such might hardly be accepted, perhaps even offensive; yet to show improvements at each step of accepted proven methodology, then such art, rather currently known as innovative designing is welcomed and appreciated, and this sentence is the trap (ibid. [including some other versions]) unto so many, such as labs and / or designers that try to compete against A Check Exact.
When a company or education system or a government has leadership in control at the particular moment, their decision making process becomes relatively satiated at that moment (Alma 26.11) so accordingly becomes ancillary [to history moments prior (Luke 12.20)] if not handled properly (PCS). If the first thing the politician then does is to brag to accordingly be selfishly elected even though many people pulled together, or if the first thing the Engineering / Designing company does is to advertise for money even though riding on the coattails of Archimedes, Einstein, Jesus Christ, and others living in a world flooded with copyrights, patents, and security criteria not disclosed, if not to their glory then toward plagiarism illegal activities and sin [so be careful how ye hear (Luke 8.18)]. So to do properly US Law required PCS by default measurably as detailed in Security PCS.
Hence others that have not yet passed PCS, can hardly be worthy of comprehending far greater things than the flying cars that A Check Exact Designed [yes, multiple mechanisms have already been designed on paper and crafted of paper (it is less a flying car design now, rather a whole field similar to how a magnet was used for a compass and then became the field of electromagnetism)].
What you can do to help make flying cars a reality:
If you love President Barack Obama and the law abiding people that fly in the sky, and want them to be more safe, write President Barack Obama, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20500, USA.
Write President Barack Obama about your love, concerns, and hopes for flying cars without further delay, mentioning this website, A Check Exact, and/or the newly updated for 2012 GodMath.com site; note that due to so many people being out of work, offered are jobs for these two linked sites, commissioned sales and Grant Writer respectively, with many having already applied for the Flying Car / Grant Writer position yet there is plenty of room for more workers.
This is a matter of highest security with and for President Barack Obama, including planning for Top matters. Also planning from the Top properly, the right aware pertinent Quality Management needs be involved covering mass security and thereafter mass transportation logistics and aspects so there is not chaos in the skies, rather safe user friendly automation in transportation with proper backup systems from the start, as much as reasonable.
This would be at no significant cost to start, and would even be profitable as described by Robert Benchoff for President Barack Obama over many months last year and into this year with multiple daily illustrations of many related governmental concerns dynamically, meaning specifics require appropriate governmental approvals, for instance such as about emergency landing pads as compared to overcrowded parking lots and in flight emergency services such as air-towing, hence the prior need for proper planning of routes with clearance approvals per Flying Car.
The numbers of Visitors to this site are increasing, thank you, though aside from Dr. Bob Benchoff of A Check Exact few if any Visitors likely write to President Barack Obama. Write, it's important, remember many splendid business ventures failed because they didn't provide feedback. Quality Assurance leaders know very few people commenting often represent change and in this case global change for the better. Your vote for a person can have a value, yet your vote for proper best handled flying cars safely and securely clearly represents your concern for now and future generations. If you do write President Barack Obama, feel free to send a copy to rbenchoff@carolina.rr.com or A Check Exact Flying Car, 10037 Orchard Grass Court, Charlotte, NC 28278-7852 USA.
A Check Exact offers a complex flying car system that A Check Exact has thoroughly unraveled [within reason (3 Nephi Chapter 19)] to thwart unpleasant surprises, for instance if random aircraft construction workers have not comprehensively considered (PCS) items such as the following: A Check Exact Innovations: Skyscraper Elevator (note: this linked site does not show the principle of the A Check Exact Flying Car Design) and such as the physics listings above then hardly can they be entrusted to subcontract for A Check Exact (Luke 16.11) save a determined delimited amount agreed as guided, each with pertinent specifications, all beforehand [of PCS especially Security PCS (1 Peter 4.19) in this case though per law including no test of faith per law (2 Corinthians 13.5) yet therefore reliance on (Default PCS example: Proverbs 25.19) quality indicators (John 10.38 including Public PCS) per law (United States Constitution Article 7)] that entities might be at proper liberty to work with A Check Exact for mutual delight among private and governing entities. Plane with folding wings can instigate dangerous highway and airport safety problems such as driving onto runways and causing digressive excursions, so for instance A Check Exact does not offer a plane with folding wings nor swing wings for sale as if flying cars for the general public, whether through a legitimate dealership relying on the manufacturer, or whether for sale through others.
There is only one best right proper way, therefore only the default way per se, to handle flying car mass transportation including traffic jam emergencies, [hidden (PCS: 2 Chronicles 23.6) though hardly to deify and rather to report on the facts here after-the-fact per se] starting with President Barack Obama and leadership safety and security, then much later fanciful brainstorming to make things delightful for dealership showrooms, hence of higher is rationale you may for instance use Google (no affiliation unless otherwise stated) to see that where it counts we're number one, just click-and-paste or type: "flying car President Barack Obama".
A Check Exact plans ahead.
Since the A Check Exact breakthrough should have complex precise computerization the way mass transit should have been done decades ago, drivers won't have to worry about whether they can see, even the blind could fly their own vehicles with simple vocal commands to the appropriate FAA entity that would program the route safely, similar more to a train than a car. Above are not shown exceptions. Above are shown normal people evidently looking, texting, drinking, and so on. This is people. People are not robots and should not be treated as if such. Motivate President Barack Obama.
History has recorded great innovations. But in the above illustration with the sun shining in the way of the driver, it has been the same as in the stone age, little has changed aside from sun glasses and tinted windows, even though for decades we have had a multitude of types of sensors available, along with other technologies such as linking as train cars do, and such as GPS radio signals per vehicle in addition to [or rather than] reflectors which drivers daily need to strain their eyes to see.
Point A to Point B, is pretty simple stuff. The Greeks and / or Romans used to move products between two towns almost a day's journey apart. They carved stone bricks and made a road with 90 degree ruts for the wheels to follow. They trained a mule to pull the cart. They achieved great success in that operation.
Some people have a wait and see approach. OK. Was that long enough. It's up to you.
*****
For more info click here to see A Check Exact Newsletters with pics.
For contact info, to keep abreast of leadership in a range of applications, and to visit the main A Check Exact labs site, click here.
To see great progress being proven in moving from theory to that which is increasingly independently accepted as real and on track visit Transporters and Digital Human Copies Technical Guide, especially the Time Principle mechanism illustration at the bottom of the page looking into the future. The mechanism is already used to some extents both in nature and synthetically as energies move as ongoingly proven and increasingly accepted, even though many continue to try to sell the idea that it would be impossible such as on TV, evidently so stating due to having not been aware of the facts as have been so presented at this linked site [see PCS above (Luke 1.37)]. Also see the illustration on A Star Is Born showing comet and nebula activities, and the illustration on Astronaut God explaining how we are to follow the path God laid through the stars, explaining fractal equations, and simplifying unto our understanding [(Revelation 2.17) as each properly interprets].
For A Check Exact free sailboat design principles, click here.
*****
No affiliation with popup ads nor banners unless otherwise stated.
