Flying car breakthrough design from A Check Exact. This website was last updated June 16, 2013. The original design breakthrough was figured at over 10 times better than helicopter lift and control!
Let's learn from mistakes, invest and move forward,
Flying cars need not be death traps. Above are shown many patterns of mismanaged energy, such as "INDUCED DRAG" (no affiliation with "Fail Funnies.com" nor popup ads that may appear on this site).
Low speed aircraft during takeoffs and landings have been risky, ask the pilots. Helicopters decapitate, so of course that is not a feature you want for your family flying car. Helicopters, jets, and rockets have trouble getting off the ground and landing because the wrong physics parameters are applied.
Above are shown real problems, people are dying. Traditionally our troops have been placed in mortal danger during risky flight training maneuvers, our firefighters could hardly reach people in blazing skyscrapers, and high corporate officials have talked low risk in banking terms while placing their most precious selves at higher routinely. Mr. President, there is a better way.
Aircraft crashes mean leaders are dying, business operations are being impacted, and products are not being delivered. Crop dusters continue to risk their lives as in the olden days, in the same risky low flying pattern as airliners currently operate everyday at airports.
God flew with great precision safely in vehicles [Prioritized Comprehensive Standardization (see PCS below) reference within the context of equipment and rising into the air (Ezekiel 11.22, Ezekiel 10.19, and Jeremiah 4.13)] and caused things to fly [PCS (Numbers 11.31)], to help us wisely understand to imitate God with full purpose of heart to be as God is, including that we learn to fly our families to where we want them to go for the greater glory of God. There is a rising continuity of the God Of Nature [including last first (reference Security PCS: Matthew 7.5 & Mark 9.35)]; first the simple then the complex, first the product then the new and improved innovation, first a people under slavery then one responsible liberty, first the body then the head [PCS (Mark 4.28)].
A Check Exact works to reveal not only a current solution, yet rather a flowing series of solutions [PCS: (such as to help Presidents overcome their being "frustrated" as they say, and such as Ether 2.5)] lest traffic jam indifference be magnified. Experts, such as at A Check Exact can often help a lot more than asked, especially at the planning stage and also importantly throughout the process even when the process is automated, for instance many want only their specific problem at the moment solved. In other words, they wanted no higher value "series of solutions", so it reasonably costs the business owner and customers more in the long run, if they stay in business. In pattern people want flying things, but relatively don't want to work on thinking about the consequences, that is, their "want" to long term "consequences" ratio is out-of-wack. The innovative / economic mindset is all too often stop-gap-technology which more readily strays and misses the point, more to the point it misses the series of points. A Check Exact uses long range planning to solve short range problems, such as via Law, ISO, NDT, and such as via affiliated ICCDBB PCS (linked site updated 9/13/2012) which already yielded Top Secret proven documented witnessed successes. ICCDBB has provided sermons for decades though now is breaking records by far as measured by the number of visitors with sermons on current applications such as involving Flight / PCS, Future Government Treasury Opportunities, and Helical Reasoning Methodology.
A Check Exact / ICCDBB PCS teaches much concerning how to improve guidance, planning, and continuous improvement, not only unraveling mysteries of the laws of nature yet also often when the right answers are clearly realized then the talents to help others increases accordingly, for instance examine Leviticus 11:20 and Leviticus 11:21 while considering if there is any applicability to land cars that might be driven from place to place, and cars that might leap from place to place.
Traditional land cars continue to offer value(s) (1 Peter 4.19 & Galatians 2.10) up to a point, that is, within a sphere or parameter set of variable points in relative terms, such as cars are valuable until streets become parking lots as people await better road plans and construction. Far into the future the land cars sector can continue to offer great value(s). If solving properly comes from the Bible then Win Win scenario(s) (Demming / Golden Rule) not only to fix what was wrong rather as applicable / PCS, since laying blame against a piece of equipment or against a group is / laws, while PCS is of guidance [previously / laws, now also PCS / guidance (reference per se 1 Corinthians 15)] as of applicability for moving forward as President Barack Obama purposefully advised.
The A Check Exact Design breakthrough is applicable for user friendly safe family-flying-cars, yet progress has also been made in power designs applications and more (see below) though so far to date the designing has hardly even begun.
Over ten times better technology helicopters and rather for flying cars for families [PCS: the Lord (Romans 1.5) have need of you to be "his excellency on the sky" (Deuteronomy 33.26) to ride / fly with the helpful Lord] is a great blessing. Originally the finding was 18 times better, though that was the pure mathematics [PCS: be pure but not only follow (see "mule" below and Psalm 32.9) yet of the example of Christ learn to rightly lead via PCS rather than of appearance only] of the power to rightly control and lift / quality value quantified, though in practical understanding it is also wise [PCS: (GodMath) with rising / ascension / resurrection (Romans 1.4) pertinent to machinery (Luke 19.40)] to consider the other components not itemized for proprietary reasons though at least to mention some weight / mass associated with safety features; therefore 10 times better performance is evidently a fair, practical, and reasonable assessment.
Economic Value: not only providing the new market of flying cars for families, the A Check Exact Design breakthrough would improve improve the product delivery / transportation industry, the rescue industry, the defense industry, the power generation utility industry, the weather / sensors communications industry, and more in addition to A Check Exact / ICCDBB PCS.
In forward planning, President Barack Obama continues to be invited to complete full authorization for pertinent PCS [Prioritized Comprehensive Standardization (SM), see below] and the A Check Exact Flying Car breakthrough. Not only needed for better protecting President Barack Obama, but also the military, CEOs, Venture Capitalists, and others continuously flying dangerously in helicopters, jets, and including astronauts at launches with unique costly equipment at slow unsafe speeds, flying per historic partly obsolete technological principles, so A Check Exact will continue to supplicate for a serious proposal from the private sector.
Near ground family vehicles need to be safe.
On television you can see and hear real sales people [not just in comedies] saying "We're crazy! We're practically giving it away!", and some sales people will sell just about anything whether it functions properly or not. Outside magazine (no affiliation unless otherwise stated) points out a critical factor involving many deaths, saying there is "no governing body". Meanwhile A Check Exact continues to proffer PCS [especially Security PCS], since Holy gifts such as living, safety, fairness, justice, and similar are important values for people.
Designers, Engineers, Inspectors, Manufacturers and others have specific areas of expertise that others don't have and current laws can hardly help such experts without opening a can of worms as it is called, which often means if to solve one problem then it creates other problems [or innovates other problems] therefore any innovating to be done needs be done via innovating solutions properly [PCS] rather than innovating problems. Without US Presidential agreement with such experts via one standard guideline, the can of worms effect continues in haphazard patterns. This is not to blame nor insult any President. After all, no law requires a US President to be an expert at anything. Courts have value, but they don't replace loved ones. Insurance has value, but doesn't replace loved ones. PCS is needed, it is vital.
Via optimizing in pertinence, PCS, high tech success patterns can typically be used to help low tech areas, for instance the international electric grid is done according to load balancing. That same load balancing can also be used by other industries such as the cattle industry, such as to help know new sources of feed and where to sell cattle. The electric industry already worked out many very specific details which means the cattle industry has a best way available to accept a flood of applicable inventions (see the A Check Exact Innovations website). Being applicably useful means not applying rocket science to flying cars [nor to cattle nor to the electric industry], rather it means applying only the properly applicable portions. The same is true of banking accountability, government, and other fields of expertise, and since PCS is not law, rather a guideline, there is no requirement, yet rather than roadblocks and despair there is hope. Moreover there is opportunity in PCS that people can opt to improve.
Historically in pattern many aerospace experts started to use goodly innovative reasoning but were prevented from putting it into practice for many various reasons; they have their stories of when they tried to do good jobs on projects but were thwarted, you can ask them. A Check Exact breakthrough Designer Dr. Bob Benchoff was invited for instance early in his professional career to visit a manufacturer after wheels fell-off their jet over Italy [not shown], when the invitation should have been prior to the problem as aerospace experts know. Because of that problem and similar A Check Exact has always had the attitude to solve before, rather than after-the-fact. That includes the best design before starting to put contraptions together. The Internet has many pics of goofy things being put together. Many lives have accordingly been lost, though the expensive contraptions look pretty before-the-facts.
Don't get it wrong, A Check Exact has nothing against proper usage of parachutes [or other stuff], for instance A Check Exact is thrilled that since 1999 the rocket launched Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (ibid.) emergency safety parachute has been used to solve aircraft failures recently "counted as the 28th CAPS save of 53 survivors" (Cirrus / COPA), though when considering flying cars twenty feet off the ground other proven safety protection is applicable.
Did you ever see a hot air balloon try to land? Aircraft [and other vehicles (see graph below)] often crash into people or other vehicles, or go sideways into trees, wires, or buildings, they strike mountains and hills, they plunge into valleys crashing into the ground, they destabilize according to how the machinery is constructed pertinent to tailgating forces, down drafts, irregular winds, irregular pavement. Sometimes their wrecks are in series, skidding long distances along highways. Airport landing strips are getting longer and longer such as for the new Jackson International Terminal which opened May 16, 2012, with some landing strips stretching for miles; so if a large jet weighing 300 tons makes an emergency landing on a highway it may bounce along for many miles before finally stopping.
While the A Check Exact can solve that, highways are not landing strips (no disrespect to Pilot Instructors intended). Concerning helicopters whether in emergencies or in regular usage over 100 soldiers have been decapitated by both top and rear blades, and putting a cage around the blades for safety interferes too much with it's other safety physics as caged portable indoor fans have proven, as such fans do not fly; and historically massive weights have been added to blade tips to counteract other physics, furthering safety risks. President Obama rather wants to see forward thinking.
GodMath.com has announced 14 million new jobs would be created in the private sector with the production of the A Check Exact flying car, as one of the many spinoff benefits of the A Check Exact designs, along with improved energy and power functionality, user friendly individual and mass transit systemization with family focus advantages, and many other benefits. Winston Churchill said "He who fails to plan is planning to fail".
We can't afford to lose more people nor expensive aircraft to ignorance. Government needs to get this into proper secure PCS mass production. Government Officials are dying, while none care to use the best reasonable means to change for the better. In addition to the number of people having died onboard during aircraft crashes are the people that died not from being on board when aircraft crashed, but from having been hit by debris or from other resultant problems.
The United States Department Of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration's Federal National Transportation Safety Board has "Descriptions of more than 140,000 aviation accidents". But if you have your own aircraft such as shown in the pic above to the left, you are less likely to report it if you don't have to. There are also people jumping with parachutes and getting injured, such as in the military with personnel that don't typically whine, and A Check Exact can help overcome such landing problems often tied to critical missions.
"About 21000 airports in the US do not have [Transportation Security Administration, TSA,...]. I use many of them daily." (according to flyertalk.com blog on Practical Travel Safety Issues). Dr. Bob Benchoff has found through experience and education that people are afraid of improvements they don't understand, so that is why the A Check Exact Flying Car Plan is from the start designed to be user friendly. That includes being user friendly to any A Check Exact Flying Car buyer and driver, and includes being user friendly to any government entity, and being user friendly to Security PCS.
Transportation has a catastrophe about to happen according to Scranton Gillette Communications which called it "a perfect storm brewing", and the same is said about obsolete underground structures, old dams, old energy systems, and other antiquated engineering and communications systems according to many sources; which is why Security PCS included the default step by step solution so as not to rock the boat inappropriately, yet for best continuous improvement, meaning that experts in their fields need one best governmental consciousness system for the President, yet for the experts in their fields, that esteemed groups already functioning might be properly heard (reference PCS: Public PCS: "Laws. PCS is explained according to those worthy") so if you want your group to have clout, this is the solution including for President Barack Obama.
Instead of stone tools and cave dwellings, properly together we can agree as to the best system to not only survive, rather to best thrive, reasonably, with excellent feedback not only to vote, yet also that experts have a position vote, not only historic experts, yet also that a mother have a position vote since being the best expert over her child under her legal responsibility hence under her expertise (reference "We the People"). We don't want flying cars that don't have floors attached properly with children falling out, rather we need quick properly organized feedback.
21000 airports is stated above, and not to insult government and rather to properly state the facts to best help government via accordingly offering the best solution: if government can't handle the 21,000 airports, how hardly could it fathom 600 million in the United States [multiple cars per family (flying cars plus road cars) increasingly in the years ahead] as a great banquet of wealth and living, yet there are 7,000,000,000 people now globally that want flying cars, and are ready to buy if they can so afford. The mass system is needed. The mass production is needed. The highest reasonably quality is needed.
Yet with PCS even greater works [(John 14.12) and greater things] will be accomplished. Not because I do it, rather because it will be done [together, yet] via the best pertinent experts for the jobs, with measurable reasonable clout and grace, once approved and properly entered into the PCS System including the PCS Security System once accordingly approved step by step, proper agreeing via proper agreeing [agreement x feedback = continuous improvement (in GodMath terminology)].
The A Check Exact Flying Car Design would help rockets take off and land more cost effectively, with greater control, and more safely.
Low speeds, takeoffs, and landings used to be risky, ask the pilots, yet now A Check Exact has a better more safe way to fly: the A Check Exact Flying Car Design. Picture a car shaped helicopter only more powerful, more accurate, without those long nearly invisible blades and better overall including no decapitation.
A person or group can misinterpret the laws of physics (and/or similar, see linked example on SEC decision), though the laws of physics don't lie.
Here is a new A Check Exact Flying Car site illustrating some of many aspects of conventional reasoning and independently proven methodologies as to why other flying car designers are heading in the wrong direction, including the United States safety reasoning and push to thwart such dangerous trial-and-error ideas even when facing external war and invasion: The new A Check Exact Flying Car design offers many safe solutions.
Concerning popular funding reasons for the potential to have flying cars, here are some of the physics:
There is a reason propeller blades are long and not short.
Similarly there is a reason wings are large and not small.
There are reasons not to use wing slits, see previous link illustration.
Balloons and sails are full of hot air when it comes to launching and landing family flying cars.
Balloons on long string delivery systems yield dangerously tangled situations.
Popped balloons and tanks of gases lose power far too quickly.
Bouncing balls and pogo sticks have hardly shown much promise.
Kites pulled by oxen showed promise, but better solutions seem available.
Bats technology is similar in pattern to bird technology using too much fuel.
Evidence supports that kings rode condors over Nazca, Peru, but the condors didn't like it.
Air is soup to hummingbirds and bugs at great fuel inefficiency relative to flying family cars.
Strapping on a jetpack is energy inefficient and not a safe flying car plan.
To launch from an incline cable car, train,...or to jettison is not a family home device.
There is a reason ion propulsion plugged into a home 110V outlet may only lift a small piece of aluminum.
Gliders, autogiros, and pedaling a balloon bike have limited power vulnerable to cross winds.
There is a reason catapults and rubber or spring slingshots and bows are not even used to move cargo.
Also there is a reason rocket fuels are expensive and not sold locally.
To sit on a powder keg or place a bucket on a firecracker is a one way trip.
Lives are risked if to wait for the God Of Nature or Mother Nature to move you off the ground (Numbers 26.10).
The human cannonball historically has trouble hitting the net.
To use an initial pulse, waves and/or particles has applications along with problems per application.
Jet turbo-engines are simply fancy short blade propellers (see above, and reference power generation / pics link below).
Beaming power to aircraft [as controlled by experts (NAVSEA, Naval Sea Systems Command)] unleashes a flood of dangerous powers or lack of powers as when one aircraft tries flying over another as increasingly is the case.
Many people struggle to apply functional ideas to other systems which inherently delimit that functionality [(reference PCS Methodology / Matthew 9.17) while of Methodology to solve may merely require a liner, buffer, emulsifier or other appropriate innovation]. For instance in consideration of ion propulsion which is functional in outer space and ion propulsion has some values elsewhere, other physics are evidently of more value applicably pertinent to here near Earth, such as due to heat risks as the ion thruster may reach 300 degrees C or about 3 times the boiling point of water, hence associated with the Carnot limit. Carnot's theorem of thermodynamics similarly applies to jet packs, hot air balloons, and other. For instance some people struggle to make faster spinning blades, and while optimization is great, after a system is reasonably optimized it is time to move on, move forward to a more applicable system pertinent to the next applicable realm of value and usefulness for best user friendly innovation and utilization. If a car doesn't get us across a river, we don't build a faster car to jump across, instead we build a boat or a bridge or other suitable next realm device.
Slow speed when starting and stopping makes problems for the Harrier and others,
while the physics of the first pic shown below,
is that jet wash goes from the front engines into the rear engines!
Further concerning the top left pic, jet wash is turbulent plus front engines suck air from the rear intakes (reference movie Summer Rental sailboat race concerning the line "stole our wind!"). The above 3 and 4 prop machines similarly do not impress in terms of air being 3D not 2D. Flying cars need to protect against side winds. The above right is not a flying car, it is a plane with folding wings. In the contraptions shown above, including planes, none come close to being acceptable flying car designs.
Don't miss the point, in true physics there is a lovely flow from one technology to the next.
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to things that don't apply to flying cars.
In flying car physics, just say no to propeller blades.
In flying car physics, just say no to wings.
In flying car physics, just say no to wing slits that increase wing weight and interfere with flexibility dynamics.
In flying car physics, just say no to any inappropriate fluid dynamics.
In flying car physics, just say no to unsafe practices and energy problems concerning mass transit.
In flying car physics, just say no to the slingshot effect at dangerously high speeds.
In flying car physics, just say no to overly complex things with many parts that can fail.
In flying car physics, just say no (currently) to dangerous jetpack mini rocket technology.
In flying car physics, just say no to 110VAC ion propulsion electrical hazards.
In flying car physics, just say no to catapults.
In flying car physics, just say no to rockets.
In flying car physics, just say no to beaming power to aircraft.
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to those small propellers, even if they come with molded material and a nice paint job to look cool....
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to dangerous jetpacks, though there is hope that future development that will overcome cost effectiveness and safety problems, after the A Check Exact Flying Car Design has been revealed [PCS: (Proverbs 4.7)].
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to giant condor wings, just say no to tiny hummingbird wings even though they can be used in an array because of fuel cost and also because extra parts especially moving parts mean extra possibilities of failures [(also reference nuclear backup systems) in need of PCS (see below)]. A Check Exact studied many birds a long time, also understanding tiny wings have value, but first things first [1. praise the Lord such as for the wisdom concerning enlightenment for power safety and security and 2. PCS (see below)].
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to both obsolete technologies [if no longer applicable per se (reference Security PCS details & Zechariah 1.4)], and to technologies that have not yet been sufficiently developed [(Ether 2.2) save of higher purpose / PCS].
When it comes to flying cars, just say no to knee jerk plans [also reference Security PCS (see stop gap pattern details)]. People are frail. Don't make machines that jerk people as if bad dogs on leashes. Rather A Check Exact Flying Car technology can assuredly protect and spare many lives. Former President George W. Bush said we must not "experiment" on people. Machines can whip about and change directions far faster than people can blink, so we need user friendly technologies rather than technologies prone to possibly cause injuries; we need blessed long term planning solutions rather than cutting corners repeatedly; and we need safe rather than sorry. Whips, catapults, slingshots, snap-quick-electromagnetic-launch-pads, giant mousetrap spring jolts, and other in pattern just don't cut it.
Jetpack or Flying Wing technology has historically often been dangerous, with expensive hard to find fuel, though progress is being made. The news just reported someone flying over the Alps using a jetpack, and while it is progress, it is important to remember people using that and similar technologies have crashed into cliff faces due to being unable to overcome sudden near ground surface effects / drafts (reference A Check Exact archived illustrations you might have, previously posted on this site). It is important to understand that jetpack users while possibly licensed pilots and likely athletic and highly skilled, can hardly compete with bats and birds in terms of visual acuity, reaction speed, durability, reliability, and such while trying to remember how to operate the machine even if very user friendly [reference VGC Foundation book provided to government covering NASA CREW biopsychology and biocybernetics in part, no affiliation unless otherwise stated though Benchoff of A Check Exact also presides over VGC Foundation], for instance if suddenly approaching wires, an antenna, or perhaps a swarm of bugs or flock of birds, and in pattern similar to that if motorcycles are dangerous, reasonably jetpacks are more dangerous since relative to flying cars the motorcycles can powerfully grab the road somewhat while things that fly such as from 0 to 100 MPH as if grab a cushion of air hence have not been powerfully quick to respond as tried under former technologies.
Larger jet-mobiles if made do or would require many of the sensing devices, automatic controls, standardized traffic route coordination, and much more that A Check Exact has been explaining for over a year. Another factor is the jetpack fuel cost effectiveness in terms of physics not discussed here for relative pattern security reasons, rather the proper solution is simply eloquent and the physics of it can be used to weigh, as a family flying car default standard, the physics of other devices.
Rocket powered cars break speed records but have trouble going slowly, and don't start easily without burning down the family house, and in similar pattern it is important to be mindful of any dangerously lethal fumes that jetpacks might exhaust as a risk to the pilot and others. Benchoff for instance used to be required to use the jetpack fuel carcinogenic ingredient perchlorate which is an acidic highly reactive and lethal to breathe. Some people want to use liquid ozone (O3), ClF3, and ClF5, all of which are unstable, energetic, and toxic (Wiki).
Families can ride bicycles but have trouble going as fast as 10 miles per hour, much less pushing it at a whopping 14 miles per hour, hardly keeping pace with a car on nearly any road. Yet PCS Methodology shows a gap between the bicycle and the rocket car. Experts can put car tires on bicycles so the tires don't rip apart if a bicycle can somehow be pedaled 55MPH, and experts can put a parachute behind a rocket; but they're missing the point. In the gap is stuff such as the motorcycle, also in the gap are regular cars, trains, and a lot of other reasonable stuff. The A Check Exact Flying Car is just that, one of those "stuff" things.
Beaming lasers and waves to power aircraft is hardly like low power signaling satellites. Years ago at the advent of pico satellites Dr. Bob Benchoff [of earned 250-1500, 2132, and NAVSEA certifications such as used to control projects of Trident nuclear submarines and Cruise Missiles] posted illustrated details on the Internet of how in one example a laser would burn the air under the pico satellites to cause them to rise to the outer atmosphere. There are many other similar pattern ways to lift things such as for military applications, but there are extreme dangers not merely from heat. Consider the increase of blinded pilots. Consider the huge increase in power needed proportional to the distance (see above NAVSEA link) compounded by the number of flying cars in mass transit not only now but in the future.
Experts in virtually all fields, together prove independent tests in pattern, such as proven of the ability of a molecule of Radon air to flow into a crack similar to throwing a softball into the Grand Canyon according to Radon Testing Methodology. An MT-L3 expert knows how to increase or reduce magnetic layers similar in pattern to an onion, while a cook for instance knows how to add bubbles to food or remove bubbles of energy patterns. The best solutions are often very simple and elegant.
"Historically, the most dangerous part of a lawmaker's job has been not violence, but travel. At least 29 members of Congress have died in accidents involving planes, automobiles and ships." (The Washington Post 1/16/11).
"Independent tally shows increase in air crash death toll" from 598 in 2008 to 766 in 2009 [(Europe News 1/11/11) about USA]. Though in 2010 in USA according to the FAA there was a great improvement to only 263 deaths, but far from perfect.
Many for instance have said that adding more energy would be too much for the materials to handle, the materials would break and fly apart. In other words, people that say such things express their own ignorance. They don't know, so instead of admitting they don't know how it's possible they say things that don't apply to what A Check Exact does. A Check Exact offers real solutions, not barriers against reasoning.
Giving our previous A Check Exact Customers the first opportunity years ago to take advantage of this newly innovated technology (see "Newsletters with pics" below) and then offering this to US Government, and the general public, none have thus far expressed any interest as witnessed by A Check Exact, and if we can't get these safety issues properly accomplished, A Check Exact can hardly offer it's more complex values.
As seen for instance on the news 9/29/2010 a New York Police helicopter fell into the water, and another airliner crashed onto the runway. Also people out of their garages are building accidents-waiting-to-happen.
$200 million is required to purchase a typical modern jetliner such as the Concorde, which has to go over 225MPH to properly takeoff or it may crash according to AerospaceWeb.org. If it crashes there is the disruption of service to other flyers, the investigating costs, the insurance, there are the lawsuits, and there is otherwise the enormous burden to families and friends due to losses of loved ones, including executives traveling on huge value business trips. Investigations are not only about malfunctions, they are also ongoing with searching for patterns such as tied to major business global acquisitions, and as tied to military workings of various nations.
Former model of efficiency.
The A Check Exact Design can of proven methodology also improve efficiencies of HVAC systems.
Manufacturers producing rockets, jets, planes, and other vehicles, along with businesses needing to transport heavy loads at moderate speeds, need to become aware that technologies such as the car fan shown above are no longer state-of-the-art (reference ages old "vortex wind funnels" and Fresnel wind lenses). Because historic technology has become obsolete, every business today would benefit from the A Check Exact breakthrough, not only directly yet also as with leadership for security, and improved processing.
An advance copy of Discover magazine (April 2012) has a full page pic of a wind tunnel with notes on page 8, for testing "SPACESHIPS" [Center Italian Research Aerospace, CIRA (located in Southern Italy)]. The new A Check Exact Flying Car technology would greatly improve this and other wind tunnel technologies, multiplying power, control, precision, and quality.
In similar pattern and concern garage doors on the sides of skyscrapers are discussed with new pics (see the link for "how your new Flying Car would look" below).
As already discussed by A Check Exact pilots understand something known as "ground effect" along with microburst, the point being that a change in air pressure as with the opening of a garage on the side of a skyscraper can act as a wind tunnel, so proper safety designing before-the-fact needs be in place (2 Chronicles 35.4).
Instead of moving laterally on the ground at dangerously high speed to takeoff faster than family cars, there is another solution. Instead of a meat ripping food blender turned inside out, called a helicopter, there is a better solution. There is a solution that enables reverse, neutral, drive, 0 [zero] to 1MPH, to 2MPH,...to 35MPH...to 55, 105, and so on up to full regular aircraft speed, filling the gaps between liftoffs and landings, yet the A Check Exact Design also allows for forward, reverse, and reasonably quick sideward lateral linear movements as well as dynamic vector movements including circular and helical increasing safety value for overcoming of a tailspin (Isaiah 19.1).
When a traditional car is at rest and turned on, the engine revs and spends energy, the same as at a stop sign, though some mass transit, especially the latest developments don't waste as much energy that way due in part to being handled united as a system flowing. Due to inertia at rest, much energy is required to get traditional cars to move and up to speed, then all that power is thwarted / wasted simply by applying the brake as the car competes to overcome the brake spending extra energy; while even an energy wasteful helicopter doesn't waste energy that much when lowering and landing. So there are many systematic and other cost effective and environment effective measures that can be had when done properly (see the latest ICCDBB Sermons) improving safety, saving time, saving fuel, and so on.
Think of how you drive miles to get to a bridge to get across a river or lake. A regular bare bones lightweight aluminum motorboat might get a couple miles per gallon according to continuouswave.com (no affiliation unless otherwise indicated). "New Vehicle Average Fuel Economy Reaches Record 24.5 MPG in January 2013" according to treehugger.com (ibid.). While "U.S. major airlines average about 64 mpg, according to calculations using Department of Transportation data" according to wsj.com 2010 (ibid.), but that's costly dangerous (see stringent FAA, EPA, and many other departments' regulations) jet fuel which is an unfair comparison since jet fuel is not in the ballpark in terms of most local gas stations. A more realistic figure is near the regular car MPG for planes that run on regular gasoline though flixxy.com 2013 claims it can achieve about 32 MPG with their gyroplane made in Holland (ibid.). Similar to crossing water, a fair car / plane comparison would be to cross over mountains or city traffic jams. Therefore even older technology can turn a 1 gallon 1 hour trip into a 1/5 gallon 10 minute trip [rather/PCS: "overcome all obstacles" (Ephesians 6.13 from GOD'S WORDŽ Translation version 1995)].
The Main Cause Of Commercial Airline Accidents Is Lack Of Proper Change:
The new safer technology is available, government only has to use it.
Many experts pretend it has nothing to do with their job, but safety is everyone's business. Many experts are stuck in the rut of complaining such as the material will break and fly apart if we spin it any faster, but that is just simply another excuse. Similarly many lazily quit thinking, claiming somebody else already thought of it. The many people use the word "impossible" which is not part of the definition of the word "innovation". In the global and universal system there are disconnects. There are banks with personnel that feel disconnected to the parts of banking that applies, such as Banker Officers flying in jets at dangerously low speeds at airports where there is the most congested air and land traffic. The same unaccountability applies. Perhaps strangely, too, the aerospace industry evidently has the same disconnect as aerospace experts clearly know of the problems of slow airport speeds where the congestion is highest (see "Presidents flying in helicopters" above).
Not only to aerospace experts, accountability applies to all experts in all fields; consider chemistry polymers for example. Almost certainly you are looking at a polymer computer system, with polymer electrical lines, polymer office equipment, perhaps polymer lamps, blinds, drapes, desk, chair, carpeting and walls. You have polymer packaged food, possibly polymer delivered air and water. Soldiers were dying from trench foot which polymers largely solved, with modern polymers letting air breathe while keeping water out (reference osmosis and pertinent green energy). High density polymers offer thread fibers, low density polymers offer waterproofing and firefighter protection used on aircraft carriers. Nobody wanted polymers according to history. Phillips Petroleum Company could hardly sell the polymer idea until 1958 with the advent of the Hula Hoop and this the point of this discussion, you have to want safe low-priced valuable beneficial flying cars more than you want Hula Hoops. In similar pattern [reference pattern recognition (PCS Job 37.17 & 18)] on the cutting edge Benchoff and Thomas of A Check Exact voluntarily funded and tested polymers and other leading compounds and composites including to meet aerospace criteria, also for instance decades ago Benchoff was among the first Magnaflux employees to x-ray inspect carbon fiber rolls which started being mass produced for aircraft, and while according to Autoweek magazine (Jan. 2013 p8) today's Boeing 787 Dreamliner is half "carbon-fiber", these technologies have hardly been utilized for various reasons of little relevance, such as due to a salesperson not convincing a key customer.
Thinking is not enough [save prayer (and measurably reference PCS and NASA CREW biocybernetics/biopsychology, PCS 3 Nephi 20.1)], make your thinking of flying cars properly known (see contacting President Obama discussion below). Today A Check Exact can draw a design for a little flying car toy, and perhaps you would see it on TV in time for Christmas. But let's not be stupid. On the other hand if security doesn't want flying cars, A Check Exact is hardly in the position to force each and every security entity globally to it's best to do it's job to protect the President, and that goes for all Presidents, CEOs, Officers, Experts, and the General Public.
President Barack Obama is reasonable, but he sees a frustratingly depressed unmotivated public facing poverty, he's just too polite to say it. While the whole time this A Check Exact Flying Car Methodology alone for example would skyrocket the US economy and US leadership by example unto other nations to follow.
A special thanks goes to leaders such as Stephen Colbert of the Colbert Report [interpreted in leadership pattern as a sword for justice and greater (Genesis 3.24)] yesterday speaking of and showing a picture of a flying drone and that technology, the day before showing new [weird] aircraft designs, and the day prior shown many types of aircraft and being anxious for flying cars. NASA has done similar, often the weirder the more. Yet the best solutions are less about weirdness and rather of beauty, bringing together the puzzle sections properly to reveal the bigger previously incomplete unseen picture, the higher previously unseen value.
A Check Exact offers you the following link to a website with a great new look in perspectives of family dwellings, businesses, and power for utilities, with pics and illustrations:
Want to see how your new Flying Car would look:
The above link has an illustration of a room of sorts, in pattern similar to an RV camper [six sided cubic elongated vehicle (PCS: Isaiah 6.1&2)] yet the Flying Car doesn't have to fly with the front side perpendicular to air causing drag, rather the Flying Car can be with a corner point in the front, with appropriate diamond point [and ark (Genesis 7.1) shape] considerations (not detailed here).
In the past people have landed on enormous runways increasing in size, the opposite of cost effectiveness including in terms of land use. It has been dangerous, for instance as of May 2, 2013 with this week in the news videos of planes crashing into each other and with a major airline jet falling from the sky [rather PCS (Matthew 10.29)] exploding after smashing into the ground.
The solution is with home landing pads [without decapitating helicopter blades] or innovated driveways; with appropriate added devices to anchor, monitor, communicate, sense, and other as FAA requires; while skyscraper plans would include ports (see above link).
Funding from government concerning FAA takeoff and landing zones [via PCS Standardization preferably] would naturally involve appropriate airport cooperative support [including Military Security, and other Departments such as FEMA], aerospace manufacturers and industrial cooperative work, mass transportation cooperation, and importantly end user-user friendly home loan management appropriate to the task:
President Barack Obama wisely named Mel Watt the new Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency May 1, 2013. Aware of law and natural human errors [including software problems due to human factors (reference VGC lobbying group, any affiliation or other is as stated otherwise)] Writing Law Congressman Mel Watt has also seen the families side of the situation, the real problems facing families and businesses, and has heard of real and enduring solutions, having entertained [PCS (Hebrews 13.2)] pertinent experts and having worked in his office in the heart of one of the greatest financial cities in the world. Considering that Charlotte, NC was the second financial center after New York, NY, though Wall Street has virtually closed it's Stock Exchange and with the World Trade Center no more, the tide has shifted considerably [PCS (Isaiah 65.17)]. As the license plates have reported, NC is First In Flight.
Natural science is available for anyone to figure, and natural science has things that come about. People can view processes and form reasonable expectations that certain things will come into usage. Verifications of A Check Exact technology / design plans continue to come in many forms, in many ways, along many paths. Some experts involve aircraft and energies in pertinent DHS leadership, some experts involve discoveries or breakthroughs supportive of A Check Exact designs via their independently having utilized specialized new scientific equipment, and some experts involve financial patterns in applicable agreements, per se. In other words, some matters are debatable, while other matters are more eminent, more popular, more enduring, and self evident.
In 2012 verification was received in further proof in part of the value(s) of the trend of PCS and the A Check Exact Methodical reasoning of independently proven proofs; this time the proof [or counted as such (see "how your new Flying Car would look" linked site for details)] comes from Discover magazine. The linked site also has new added features illustrated, though the illustrations are more toward the traditional, than toward disclosing secretive proprietary features in an effort to not confuse the general public, while maintaining the importance of security information keep on a need to know basis (reference Public PCS Laws Section). Look into the Flying Cars future with sound reasons provided, along with a practical power plants energy solution for increasing energy efficiency, with the above linked site newly updated to help you understand electromagnetism [Magnetism Periodic Table] and the strongest forces in the known Universe.
People often fear unselfishness. Because of that, for others opportunity exists.
People also fear eddy currents, able to sweep people off their feet unexpectedly [or rather let us properly reason what might be expected]. Consider a leaf rising in the air. Heat rises from the ground, though most wind comes at us sideways as the wind moves around the planet. So the rising leaf is often rising due to a bend in the air lift-time continuum or a bubble lift as the way a bubble forms on the paint of a car (no affiliation with linked Sinapore Airshow). The bend or eddy current bubble swirl raises the leaf so the leaf falls to it's momentary resting place(s) higher in the air as it rises. In worldly terms, from gravity and sideways forces can come lift.
People also fear the Lord. The above "pics" link also has a link on how to raise your abilities, such as to innovate better designs, such as concerning Flying Cars, Power, and IQ, and not merely of talk in self promotion, rather in proven methodology, expertise, and leadership, with problem solving and higher values as never seen before: for your sake in witness A Check Exact for instance has some such values not seen by others, and you are free to report back to A Check Exact as other experts have (typical Feedback / Benchmarks are found archived as linked in the following Section under the next illustration), yet progress is made better innovating increasingly.
People are evidently afraid in terms of safety and risk, when they lack PCS. You can travel outside and find a million different opinions, yet there is only one best opinion. There is only one best Methodology to determine the best opinion to reach.
People fear heights, such as roof tops, ladders, and so on. Flying represents past experiences of falling down and being injured, and hearing of people being killed, just look at the crashes at the top of this page. People don't want guesswork, people want credible Flying Car Methodology [even if they don't know the right words], and that Flying Car Methodology [with many techniques for specific applications] is included under the PCS Methodology of A Check Exact.
Some people fear too much boredom, it drives them nuts. Normal people at times find boredom a pleasant break from the hectic pace. A Check Exact Flying Car Methodology may likely as evidenced be feared or ignored because it is so boring, much the way a building on fire is solved to become no longer a threat; yet look at the result, instead of deconstruction, helpful useful construction as never before!
Drivers, Pilots, Cargo, and Mental Safety.
Testing Methodology PCS is in it's infancy, though others pioneered the foundations of PCS Methodology such as Edward Demming / Win Win / Golden Rule Philosophy.
In Flying Car Designing and in related Designing subject matter A Check Exact has an Innovations website A Check Exact News Headlines 2013 with Pics and Illustrations, functioning together with the A Check Exact Newsletters website linked at the bottom of this page. While the A Check Exact Newsletters website offers mainly text some years and often in hindsight recapping our great achievements news, this new Innovations website offers more in terms of visualizing the future within proven methodology or at least as normal to the industry and/or situations, also as they say a picture speaks a thousand words.
Transmission Breakthrough: A Check Exact just made another design breakthrough solution! See the A Check Exact Main Site Schedule Of Events. One crazy aspect of obsolete drive train [automatic] transmission technology including starters and [manual] clutches, has all too often been reliance on friction, when we are supposed to be relying on the opposite [(PCS: 1 Timothy 6.5 yet with Romans 13.2 and 2 Chronicles 9.14), also applicable to electrical resistors]. To try to idle or run the engine at high speed while putting on the friction brakes resisting the flow of power makes little sense including in Green Energy terms.
People have had troubles with transmissions. Historically they have been costly to build and repair, they have many moving parts, and there are other problems, yet A Check Exact using PCS just came through with a solution guided from above, yet already of patterns of proven methodologies as the update toward the bottom of this linked site discusses along with A Check Exact having made typical transmissions obsolete hardly at the cost of losing jobs, rather future looking as mechanical experts continue to hold value if properly organized (see PCS, especially Security PCS details). Power redistribution without the former problems and within the PCS patterns indicator including flow of patterns.
The A Check Exact Flying Car Design Plan explains the PCS, in pattern similar to how Genesis prophetically explains the Bible to a measurable extent; in that the Plan including Proven Methodology hence including security, is a default agreement system, that is, to have the best proper pertinent Proven Methodology is chosen by default, lest by default an ancillary, subordinate, inferior or similarly a less valuable pattern be tried:
Other than doing what the Boss wants, doing what the Contract states, or doing what the Purchase Order requires, an aerospace design barrier that pertinent experts may have according to evidence / experience, is the greater value. In the past, part (both relative and absolute references: reference movie The Edge "If one man can do it another man can do it" and more authoritatively reference PCS: Exodus 31.1-3) of it was known as Ivory Towers, that experts would not discuss things that might be out of their field lest they be found slightly or more unsure of their comments per se, and "per se" is the key aspect to overcome. If an aeronautical jet expert for instance without higher business approval (law and/or prophets) praises bubble technology which might only be slightly applicable to their job requirements, they stand to possibly jeopardize their own job along with the credibility of that corporation even though for instance a jet travels within an envelope bubble, the cockpit is covered by a bubble, bubbles form in blood, and so on.
Such natural confinement per unit and/or per field of expertise often negates the positive effects unraveled by experts of other fields (Matthew 23.24). Cruise missiles for instance, launched from submarines hardly get wet at all [from the fabric of water or the hydrophilic vehicle], but if an aeronautic expert suggests surface to air or air to air launch with removal of part of the fabric of air the expert might be removed from position and reassigned for having been rocking the boat inappropriately from the Boss' perspective. If the Boss doesn't ask for advice, often they don't want such help whether worth pennies or billions (see PCS Traceability). Relatively such is a tiny thing so hardly would the greater matters be granted to such experts and businesses (2 Kings 22.5), that is, rather than be run-off or driven from a more valuable design blessing consider the greater (2 Corinthians 3.11), the continuity of how to not merely make a better design yet rather to accomplish better designing including a multitude of designs responsibly [fly (Joel 2.5)], first the first step then the next (James 3.17, 1 Timothy 3.10, and Matthew 5.24) generally since to skip a step requires the extra responsibility burden [one step of responsibility times two as a minimum (Zephaniah 1.9), with added unsteadiness if improperly prepared (Job 41.19)]. To please your Boss is reasonably appropriate, yet add a little salt (Leviticus 2.13) to evidence you are alive, alert, and thinking on the side of the Boss, to work such as greater as when the Boss desires, for you and your Boss' unit, and for your Boss' Bosses, humbly according to the greater PCS purpose [(1 Peter 5.6) accordingly if you so freely choose such enlightenment unraveled].
Do you know a pilot that can personally navigate better than a bird (reference VGC and NASA Biocybernetics) or do you know of a rocket faster than the Big Bang, even so, rather seek to design better aeronautically (Jeremiah 18.11) as A Check Exact has done. If one business can do it another business can do it, though each according to the talents God provides.
Contamination historically applied mainly to objects and only marginally to experts, yet as any level of virtually any given field becomes more thoroughly analyzed in terms of applicability per se, such as whether a family with or without their friends would be sufficiently credible to have an automatically controlled Flying Car, the inspection of the objects, the Flying Cars, has one parameter and the family and other passengers have other parameters within Format in terms of human error, projected reasonable expectations / PCS Guideline, safety, and so on.
If security is not free of contamination, A Check Exact needs proper help from top security cooperatively toward reasonably improving federal security to achieve the Plan Agreement Default, to bring security up to standard. According to Edward Demming and the Golden Rule it means to remove security problems they already have [if any], per se; then to reach a new better accord, in this case flying security vehicles according to their acceptance since A Check Exact has already coordinated and has been accordingly designing of proven methodology [proven by other pertinent experts as a minimum, per field of expertise] and has already accepted the A Check Exact designing. Hence Head of Security President Barack Obama only needs agree [concerning to be responsible over people, security gates, instruments, and equipment (Numbers 4.26)], if that is what this President thinks this President should do.
What is being done by A Check Exact, and what more can be done?
Proprietary PCS of A Check Exact / affiliate ICCDBB has written the top legal and safety Officer, our Commander-In-Chief President Barack Obama an illustrated / paper text treatise of documents, with a limited amount of revelry toward making it sensibly palatable (3 Nephi 16.2 & such as of Jon Stewart genre) with moments of stark simplicity to clarify such as toward populations overcoming racism, and such as overcoming fruitless hatred between nations. In pattern Politicians, News Anchors, Authors, Code Writers, Mothers, and others each have expertise, but to have a News Anchor write Code is not necessarily appropriate. Similarly to have Politicians write legislation to tell Top Secret Bomb Technicians how to make bombs is not necessarily appropriate but more likely is wrong and dangerous to many. To contaminate experts (Exodus 37.13) is not the same as to write laws. There is one law that all people are to follow (A), also there are other guidelines that are for free enterprise volunteers to follow (B) with each guideline compendium appropriate for each group to utilize; and these must not receive contamination due to non-qualified experts [often in higher authority]. Laws (A) need be written with representational approvals for all, whereas guidelines (B) only need approvals fairly pertinent to each group.
A Check Exact and affiliates have done much to further such as for cutting edge technology concerning feminine products, calibration standards, healthcare, and other industries. A Check Exact has also worked with Top Secret aerospace corporations and provided this website accordingly.
Something that should otherwise be part of Security PCS but is not, and is now announced here, is something the US Public has a right to know about flying and Top Security matters (John 12.38), and that is not detailed in the Security PCS documents, also known as the White House Papers, is the need to provide certain advanced (reference Default / PCS) checks-and-balances against Security PCS lest the National Quality Assurance Manager unfairly become a dictator, rather per law the public has legal rights. So after initial setup of PCS within government (Top Security matters / Security PCS), then free enterprise businesses and people can consider National Quality Assurance Manager term of office and are even invited to make the initial presentation to Congress rather than the President [and the National Quality Assurance Manager together (see Security PCS)] in order to preserve proper legal checks-and-balances, that in Quality Assurance terms includes appreciation of values such as for instance no-conflict-of-interest, and for instance no-cross-contamination-between-fields-of-study-definitions-and-practices such as between the Quality Assurance field and practice and the Politics field and practice, and such as between Quality Assurance field and practice and the Judicial Branch field of study and practice.
The original reasoning of the United States Founding Fathers "to form a more perfect Union" in an orderly hence one agreed measurable method (PCS / Preamble to the Constitution & agreeing with Matthew 22:40 / Demming Win Win)] was superb, from above not pretending to ignore the proper needs of those in such need whether rich or poor. While PCS Standardization [or at least a furthering of expert agreed interpretation (checks-and-balances) measurably] might have been best accomplished hundreds of years ago such as if realized to help plan the future FAA leadership with air power, and to perhaps help the President organize "more perfect" treaties; yet today we need not be idle (2 Thessalonians 3.11) rather safely let the children fly, as A Check Exact PCS is a method of safe checks-and-balances inclusive of designing as applicable to flying cars.
Security PCS was to initiate flying car design matters when President Barack Obama began to utilize PCS, though Security PCS also made very clear the importance of the Demming Principle including resistance against the Demming Principle. For instance when a new customer such as a factory asked Demming how much it would cost to improve their factory Demming would reply it depended upon how much was wrong with it [even though there is a more excellent way (reference Security PCS projection chart with years ranging from roughly 2100 to 2150, not disclosed here for secure/safety/quality reasons)]. So that nearly free initial matter is no longer a consideration (see Dynamic/Security PCS) per se, though currently if initially well funded to micro-manage a large select team [though a small/insignificant team relative to government size and relative to PCS Plans as submitted to President Obama)(also see James 3.5)] then there is hope of such near future blessings proper flying car technologies can bring such as toward overcoming future traffic jams, though time spent by the National Quality Assurance Manager on flying car design matters would reduce time spent otherwise on PCS.
In consideration of the above Demming / Dynamic matter, to simplify the PCS Plan that it be met by less illegal (Constitution) and/or unfair (Points-Of-Doctrine, Community Standards, and similar) resistance, rather than Flying Car Landing Pads at each home the Flying Car Plan now is to instead simply have Flying Car Landing Pads not at each school bus stop due to safety for children, though similar to the school bus stop system pattern easy for parents and communities to understand and safely utilize. Hence the dynamic shift is now away from typical personal A Check Exact Flying Car ownership, to typically rather opt for this now disclosed A Check Exact Flying Car mass transit system. Exceptions might include for instance special permits for Members Of Congress such as to convene.
Applicable to flying and certain other topics, public legal rights were left off the Security PCS list that the Demming principle regarding resistance be proportionally preserved / overcome / Golden Rule. This also is not listed in Proprietary PCS nor in Public PCS since it is the experts, the people, who rightly deserve to be heard with their comments for best improvement per PCS Authorized Format, or other similar, such as approval / default (similar to dictionary definition), representational approval, vote, conditional approval, perhaps future passage of law(s) [such as perhaps a "four" year "Term" (United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1) or non-time-dependent depending on perhaps the artistry, creativity, and talents of the people perhaps peculiarly (Philemon 1.14 & 16) such as a four accomplishments Term (2 Chronicles 8.14)] or appropriate other, that is, it is up to the people if / when each volunteers to become so authorized (reference Security PCS for further details). It is as if an ongoing basis (Job 32.3 & Romans 12.1), rather PCS is a dynamic system (We the People, God Bless) relative to law, since small groups [perhaps a military unit] needs adapt quickly (Matthew 23.23) whereas law over all people is reasonably (truths self evident) more comprehensive: more approval considerations.
To calibrate aerodynamics for instance, it is hardly worthy of adding a task for our leaders to do [so enable free enterprise properly, PCS (Proverbs 23.5 & "Bribery" United States Constitution Article 2 Section 4)], rather it is for appropriate experts to solve, until such time as they require higher guidance and/or lawmaking. Yet with calibration there are already solutions available such as from the time of Archimedes. Today we still use patterns such as compound pulley systems often credited to Archimedes.
If to use a pattern such as "compound pulley systems", then A Check Exact defaults to no immediate reason for President Obama, Congress, nor the Department Of Justice to be tasked with passing and approving such new legislation on "compound pulley systems" (also see Innovations above). They have enough work to do, their assistance would be voluntary on their part, legal and full of grace whether to assist or not according to their esteemed position(s).
To design that which has already been designed by Archimedes and other ancient people, each in part, becomes less about a new legal issue and more as fact-of-science and fact-of-law and grace already approved and agreed. To strategically change our top law such as an Article of the US Constitution, requires an Act-Of-Congress, though to change how well a pilot might fly an aircraft needs no such Act-Of-Congress if no regulations might be broken [PCS: (Genesis 6.7 & 8) free enterprise].
Flying cars need certain things, for instance planes are often mildly tested [not rigorously rather appropriate testing (reference ISO Compendium on sampling, black box, and glass box)] with radiation (RT) and ultrasonics (UT). Calibration applies to objects used in RT and UT. If two RT technicians discuss RT in front of a UT technician, the UT technician can learn much about RT and UT, but if the RT discussion involves the technical term "sensitivity" then it could confuse the UT listener since RT "sensitivity" is virtually the opposite of UT "sensitivity", so one field of expertise can contaminate another field of expertise. Yet at the higher levels RT experts are often also UT experts (reference ASNT SNT-TC-1A & MIL-STD-410 LIII Basic); so some people have a way to overcome certain amounts of contamination per se.
What you can do to help make flying cars a reality:
Write President Barack Obama, The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20500, USA, mentioning this website, A Check Exact, and/or GodMath.com.
A Check Exact offers a complex flying car system that A Check Exact has thoroughly unraveled [within reason (3 Nephi Chapter 19)] to thwart unpleasant surprises, for instance if random aircraft construction workers have not comprehensively considered (PCS) items such as the following: A Check Exact Innovations: Skyscraper Elevator (note: this linked site does not show the principle of the A Check Exact Flying Car Design) and such as the physics listings above then hardly can they be entrusted to subcontract for A Check Exact (Luke 16.11) save a determined delimited amount agreed as guided, each with pertinent specifications, all beforehand [of PCS especially Security PCS (1 Peter 4.19) in this case though per law including no test of faith per law (2 Corinthians 13.5) yet therefore reliance on (Default PCS example: Proverbs 25.19) quality indicators (John 10.38 including Public PCS) per law (United States Constitution Article 7)] that entities might be at proper liberty to work with A Check Exact for mutual delight among private and governing entities. Plane with folding wings can instigate dangerous highway and airport safety problems such as driving onto runways and causing digressive excursions, so for instance A Check Exact does not offer a plane with folding wings nor swing wings for sale as if flying cars for the general public, whether through a legitimate dealership relying on the manufacturer, or whether for sale through others.
There is only one best right proper way, therefore only the default way per se, to handle flying car mass transportation including traffic jam emergencies, [hidden (PCS: 2 Chronicles 23.6) though hardly to deify and rather to report on the facts here after-the-fact per se] starting with President Barack Obama and leadership safety and security, then much later fanciful brainstorming to make things delightful for dealership showrooms, hence of higher is rationale you may for instance use Google (no affiliation unless otherwise stated) to see that where it counts we're number one, just click-and-paste or type: "flying car President Barack Obama".
What else can you do to help overcome traffic congestion for you and your children and to have flying cars:
Many people know people that came into sudden wealth, such as due to having hit the lottery. The Atlantic Wire [and previous (reference VGC / NGISC) not affiliated unless otherwise indicated] reported "Sad Stories of Lotto Winners" www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/03/terribly-sad-true-stories-lotto-winners/50555/ [without proper authorization and implementation (VGC & PCS) ibid.] resulting in money going to crimes, broken families, and teaching / same funding source which illegally makes pertinent addicts the funding sources, the bosses. "What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul?" (Matthew 16.26). As large funds for errant ways is not the same as "delightsome land" (Malachi 3.12) full of mercy and grace as angels have, yet we can try.
So tell people, if they have a pile of money talk with them, and it is not too selfish to imagine that they might give you a ride in the first real flying car. Though there is no need to dangerously show off. To have some amount of fun is not illegal, though be considerate of others.
A Check Exact plans ahead.
You see all these things, don't you? [PCS (Matthew 24.2)]
Since the A Check Exact breakthrough should have complex precise computerization the way mass transit should have been done decades ago, drivers won't have to worry about whether they can see, even the blind could fly their own vehicles with simple vocal commands to the appropriate FAA entity that would program the route safely, similar more to a train than a car. Above are not shown exceptions. Above are shown normal people evidently looking, texting, drinking, and so on. This is people. People are not robots and should not be treated as if such. Motivate President Barack Obama.
Men's Health magazine, October 2012 page 151 printed that of the ways to die according to the National Safety Council, Motor Vehicle Accidents is number one after natural medical causes such as disease. The cited Motor Vehicle Accidents tally did not include Air Traffic Accidents also high on the magazine's chart though which mainly effects leaders and those with money. It makes an average person about 80 times more likely to die from an Air Traffic Accident than from a flood, or a rich leader about 800 times more likely; except that when discussing flying cars for families the distinction is lessened. A Check Exact wants family flying cars done right, safely.
Importantly A Check Exact wants maintenance with clearly traceable responsibilities. Pertinent maintenance includes not merely of each Flying Car item, yet also other items of responsibility per se of interactive systems and elements such as maintenance of modern weather measuring devices and their communications' systems (reference A Check Exact Proprietary PCS). Also A Check Exact wants the best proper format for responsible feedback, such as to include emergency matters for immediate automatic response, and such as concerning passenger comfort.
Drivers and pilots can be distracted due to many things such as lights, passengers, alcohol, marijuana (penalties chart), and so on, therefore user friendliness and safety are key responsibilities, from coordinated planning and funding through maintenance control (example).
History has recorded great innovations. But in the above illustration with the sun shining in the way of the driver, it has been the same as in the stone age, little has changed aside from sun glasses and tinted windows, even though for decades we have had a multitude of types of sensors available, along with other technologies such as linking as train cars do, and such as GPS radio signals per vehicle in addition to [or rather than] reflectors which drivers daily need to strain their eyes to see.
Point A to Point B, is pretty simple stuff. The Greeks and / or Romans used to move products between two towns almost a day's journey apart. They carved stone bricks and made a road with 90 degree ruts for the wheels to follow. They trained a mule to pull the cart. They achieved great success in that operation.
Some people have a wait and see approach. OK. Was that long enough. It's up to you.
For more info click here to see A Check Exact Newsletters with pics.
For contact info, to keep abreast of leadership in a range of applications, and to visit the main A Check Exact labs site, click here.
To see great progress being proven in moving from theory to that which is increasingly independently accepted as real and on track visit Transporters and Digital Human Copies Technical Guide, as in part seen on TV [(History Channel January 2, 2013, no affiliation unless otherwise stated) a decade after being posted on the Internet "by Dr. Bob Benchoff, 12/30/2002"], especially the Time Principle mechanism illustration at the bottom of the page looking into the future. The mechanism is already used to some extents both in nature and synthetically as energies move as ongoingly proven and increasingly accepted, even though many continue to try to sell the idea that it would be impossible such as on TV, evidently so stating due to having not been aware of the facts as have been so presented at this linked site [see PCS above (Luke 1.37)]. Also see the illustration on A Star Is Born showing comet and nebula activities, and the illustration on Astronaut God explaining how we are to follow the path God laid through the stars, explaining fractal equations, and simplifying unto our understanding [(Revelation 2.17) as each properly interprets].
For A Check Exact free sailboat design principles, click here.
There are other ideas on levitation, many are old ideas, and many are excellent for certain purposes. Here are some sites unaffiliated sites you may find of interest, with ideas not related to the superb A Check Exact Flying Car Design breakthrough: www.blacklightpower.com and http://reocities.com/CapeCanaveral/lab/3354/index3.html .
No affiliation with popup ads nor banners unless otherwise stated.
