Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!


Please do not remove the author's name from this file or print / store the work anywhere without it.Article taken directly from source to maintain creditablity.

Hot Rod Super Performance Directory: 1986 Annual

What's New in Street Cams

By John Baechtel

    First Some Basics

    Successful camshaft selection requires
    careful reflection on a variety of interrelated
    factors, including compression ratio, engine speed
    range, vehicle weight and desired results.
    The most important question is what you really want
    the camshaft to do for you. The more versatility you
    expect from a given camshaft profile, the less total
    performance it will provide in any specific area;
    hence, optimaizing performance across a broad rpm
    range generally requires the application of performance
    crutches or, if you will specific combinations
    of intake manifolding, header sizing, gearing
    and spark curves selected to help carry the
    system when other components are operationg
    at less than optimum efficiency. Working
    beyond the bolt-on stage, it is possible to
    crutch the system more successfully by varying
    valve and port sizes, compression ratio, connecting
    rod and stroke length, and other factors directly
    affect an engine's performance quotient. Recent
    advancements make it possible to stretch the
    envelope to a greater degree, but hte basic tenets
    of camshaft selection still apply in the
    broadest sense.

    Since the camshaft is the command center controlling
    the amount of fuel flowing through an engine, it
    follows that an increase in lift and duration will
    improve power. But mechanical and physical
    limitations confuse the issue. Exhaust backflow
    and charge contamination, piston-to-valve interference,
    valve spring coil bind and other factors combine
    to define the mechanical limits of a given
    engine's valve timeing window. Once the designers
    have mapped that perimeter, they have to work within
    that framework to improve performance. Naturally, the
    envelope can be expanded if you're willing to cut the
    pistons to gain more valve-to-piston clearance, and
    make room for increased valve travel via spring seat
    and valve guide height alterations, but the majority
    of street cams are designed to work within the existing
    limits of the OEM design. Hence, cam designers can only
    improve performance by creating greater area under the
    lift curve. This means opening the valves faster and
    holding them open longer before closing them as quickly
    as possible, a procedure that creates its own special set
    of problems. Computer-design modeling and precision
    grinding equipment have enabled manufacturers to maintian
    strict contorll of this fast valve action and the
    new-found performance it offers.

    Working within the exsting limits of your engine's
    components, effective duration is still the prime
    consideration when selecting a camshaft. Now that
    the industry has adopted the .050-inch lift figure
    as a basis for comparison, this is the figure you
    should consider first. If fuel economy and dead smooth
    idle are your primary considerations, you should be
    looking at cams with 200 degrees or less of effective
    duration at .050-inch lift. This is the realm of the
    stock camshaft, and most manufacturers are hard pressed
    to offer truly significant gains in this area, especially
    when the rest of the engine remains stock and electronic
    monitoring and controls are being applied. With hydraulic
    camshafts you can generally maintain smooth idle
    characteristics and good torque up to around 220 degrees.
    Mechanical cams will take about another 10 degrees without
    serious deterioration of egine vacuum and idle quality.
    Cams in this range still work well in stock and near-stock
    engines, and will definitely improve performance when teamed
    with headers and slightly low gear ratios. Stock or small
    CFM performance carburators, Low-speed, torque-type intake
    manifolds and hotter ignitions can also be applied with
    these cams.

    Getting into actual performance cams, you're looking at
    215 to 230 degrees in a hydraulic grind and up to 240 degrees
    with a mechanical cam. In this range you can still expect
    relatively good idle charactersitics, some loss of engine
    vacuum and good low speed performance. Special aftermarket
    perfornace equipment complements these camshafts, but you
    still want to employ intake and exhaust systems that maintian
    high flow velocities. Lower gearing and a recurved ignition
    are recommended, and these cams tend to favor higher compression
    ratios and standard transmissions, or automatics with slightly
    higher stall-speed converters.

    Serious high-performance street work takes you into the 230 to 245
    degree range with hydraulic cams and 240 to 255- degree range
    with mechanical grinds. These cams should only be used in lighter
    cars with big engines and intake and exhaust systems to match.
    Low rearend gears and high stall-speed converters are necessary,
    and you can expect a rough idle and poor low-speed driveability,
    but good mid-range torque and power if you've geared the car
    correctly. Beyond this range you're getting away from the street
    environment, and you shouldn't really consider it unless you're
    willing to trade the rough idle and poor driveability for all
    the righteous high-speed power.

    Valve Lifters

    There are three basic types of valve lifters or tappets,
    as they are often called. Hydraulic lifters are the most
    common type because they are trouble-free and offer the
    most effective component expansion due to heat. A hydraulic
    lifter functions much like a valvetrain shock absorber, changing
    its length in minute amounts to accommodate valvetrain growth
    and absorbing the inherent mechanical shock loads coursing through
    the system. They are ideal for almost every application, including
    high-performance engines if properly adjusted and maintained
    with clean engine oil. Hydraulic lifters normally function in a partially
    collapsed state so they can expand or contract as necessary. In severe
    high-rpm situations where the valve spring is no longer able to control
    the valve, some degree of separation occurs and lthe lifter pumps up to
    its full capacity; hence the term "floating the valves." It isn't the
    lifters that float; they're only responding to the onset of valve float
    by trying to take up the clearance. This problem is most commonly solved
    by slight increases in valve spring seat pressure and by adjusting the
    lifter preload just beyond zero lash where the hydraulic plunger is just
    starting to compress. Usually 1/8 to 1/4 turn past zero lash will suffice.

    Mechanical lifters require special clearance ramps on the opening
    and closing sides of the lobes to gently take up the valve lash
    or clearance necessary to accommodate valvetrain growth in the
    absence of a hydraulically controlled system. All mechanical
    camshafts have to be periodically adjusted to maintain the proper
    operating clearance. They generally have a higher rpm potential
    for the simple reason that there is no lifter pump-up holding the
    valve off the seat. Once the spring has lost control of the valve
    the engine would continue to run at reduce performance level until
    rpm returned to a point twhere the spring could regain cotrol of
    the valve. At this point the same operating tolerance is still
    in the system and the machanical lifter continues to function
    normally. Due to the difference in ramps, mechanical cams generally
    idle more smoothly and create higher manifold vacuum. Valvetrain
    noise and periodic adjustment are seen as the main drawbacks of
    mechanical cams.

    Roller tappets are special because they artificially create a much
    wider tappet base diameter than that available in a standard valve
    lifter bore. Because of this they can produce tappet acceleration
    velocities far in excess of those available from mechanical and
    hydraulic tappets. Their primary disadvatage is high intitial cost
    but this is generally outweighed by their capacity to generate far
    more useful valve timing figures. Roller tappets operate successfully
    under marginal lubrication conditions, but they retain the disadvatages
    of valvetrain noise and periodic adjustment. Manufacturers are just
    now beginning to combine roller tappets with hydraulic mechanisms to
    obtain the best of both worlds. These lifters are not new, but their
    application to the automotive powerplants is relatively recent. Ford,
    GM and Chrysler all have hydraulic roller tappets of some sort, and
    Speed Pro has recently introduced a whole new line of hydraulic roller
    tappet performance camshafts for street use.

    Variable Duration Cams

    Racers have long uderstood the procedure for altering an engine's
    performance characteristics by making valve lash changes to effectively
    lengthen or shorten duration. Increasing valve lash by as much as .008 inch
    and decreasing it as much as .006 has generally been regarded as the safe
    acceptable limit; you tighten it for more top-end power and loosen it for
    more low-end torque.

    The Competition Cams High Energy series of hydraulic cams has been
    overwhelmingly popular in recent years because they really deliver
    on ther performance promise. Now Comp Cams has expanded their commitment
    with the intorduction of their new variable duration mechanical and
    street roller magnum cams, which bring an adjustability factor to street
    performance cams. With some changes to the tappet acceleration ramps,
    Comp Cams is now offering grinds that allow you to vary the lash a total
    of .015 inch to gain a net duration change of +/-10 degrees. The variation
    isn't quite that much when checked at the .050-inch number, and your're
    still only varying the lash up or down by about .007 inch, but it's enough
    to provide quite an adjustable street cam for multipurpose driving.

    For example, a 272 degree cam at .030-inch valve lash becomes a 282 degree
    cam at .022 inch lash and a 292 degree cam at .015 inch lash; all this
    with a net lift of .495 inch, which doesn't change. This particular cam
    has a .050-inch lift duration of 236 degrees, which means it will mellow
    out to less than 230 degrees at the loose lash setting and tighten up to
    around 242 degrees at .015-inch lash. The cams can be adjusted even more
    by varying the intake and exhaust lash; you can even order cams with special
    variable valve timing. They are offered in both mechanical and roller tappet
    designs, and their fast valve action makes them one of the most useful and
    powerful choices available.

    Camshaft Intensity

    Harvey Crane is one of the most respected designers in the camshaft
    business. He is one of the earliest proponents of the duration at
    .050-inch lift concept for comparison purposes, and he points out
    that the true measure of a cam's effectiveness is above .050-inch
    lift. He further suggests that a closer evaluation of tappet activity
    below .050-inch lift will provide a more useful indication of a cam's
    true potential. Since the area between the base circle and the
    .050-inch lift point represents a transitional area where the tappet
    is accelerated from a static to a dynamic condition, it can tell you
    a lot about how well the cam will perform in the car; it can really
    shed some light on how well the cam will perform compared to another
    cam ground on the same centerline.

    Harvey's new rating system appraises cams according to their hydraulic
    intensity on their major intensity. Hydraulic intensity is the difference
    in duration between .004-inch lift and .050-inch lift for hyfraulic cams;
    major intensity is the difference between .020-inch lift and .050-inch
    lift on mechanical and roller tappet designs. In either case, the lower
    the intensity number, the better the cam will work in the car.

    For example, a cam that measures 270 degrees at .050-inch lift and
    220 degrees at .004-inch lift has a hydraulic intensity of 50. When
    compared to the same specs on another cam with lower intensity number
    with the same centerline, the cam with the lower intensity number will
    be stronger because it accelerates the tappet faster-and the resulting
    reduction in seat timing and low-lift shrouding offers greater overall
    efficiency. The secret is in how to reduce the ramp without making a lot
    of valvetrain noise and compromising durability. Cams with low intensity
    numbers generally make a broader torque curve and are easier on
    valvetrain parts.

    Crane's new series of performance street cams are all based on Harvey's
    intensity theory, but it may be difficult to really compare them to
    other brands since most manufacturers provide a .006-inch duration
    spec instead of a .004-inch number. Nevertheless, understanding Crane's
    new theory and how it applies to fast-action cams is critical to deriving
    maximum performance from you camshaft selection. Once you uderstand
    how and why it works, your're well on your way to making it work in your
    own car.

    Street Rollers

    Street Roller cams can actually be considered the forerunners of variable
    valve timing cams and lifters because they are capable of accomplishing
    nearly the same results. Granted a street roller cam encourages a certain
    performance mystique, but there are genuine performance advantages to
    be derived from a roller configuration. Detroit automakers have already
    been convinced that there are gains to be made in friction reduction,
    and this is the chief reason for the use of rollers in some new
    performance applications like the 5.0L Mustang GT This is essential
    from a fuel economy standpoint, but more important is that you can put
    a more aggressive profile on a roller cam without necessarily losing
    improtant characteristics such as good engine idle vacuum, a smooth
    idle and low-speed driveability.

    Street rollers can generate smooth, high-vacuum idle characteristics
    and still provide a great deal more power and rpm capability because
    they have greater high-lift area and superior air flow capability
    while maintaining relatively short duration timing. For example, a
    Competition Cams 268 hydraulic cam will have rougher idle than a
    comparable 268 roller cam. When you compare their numbers you find
    that the 268 hydraulic is rated at 218 degrees at .050-inch lift,
    while the 268 roller is rated at 224. Pretty close. But when you get
    up around .200-inch lift you find that the roller is rated at
    141 degrees as opposed to only 128 for the hydraulic, and it gets
    better as you open the valve farther. This particular roller cam
    actually opens the valve nearly .100-inch farther and holds it open
    longer while maintaining similar idle quality. Moreover, in many
    cases the extra lift is not detrimental to valve-to-piston clearance.
    Looking at each cam's rated lift at TDC we find that the roller is
    only opening the valve .008-inch farther than the hydraulic during
    the period when the piston is hanging out in the vicinity. Hence,
    the benefits of street roller designs: Less friction, better fuel
    economy and more power while maintianing acceptable idle quality and
    low speed driveability.

    Street rollers can generate smooth, high-vacuum idle characteristics
    and still provide a great deal more power and rpm capability because
    they have greater high-lift area and superior air-flow capability
    while maintianing relatively short duration timing. For example, a
    Competition Cams 268 hydraulic cam will have a rougher idle than a
    comparable 268 roller cam. When you compare their numbers you find
    that the 268 hydraulic is rated at 218 degrees at .050-inch lift, while
    the 268 roller is rated 224. Pretty close. But when you get up around
    .200-inch lift you find that the roller is rated at 141 degrees as
    opposed to only 128 for the hydraulic, and it gets better as you open
    the valve farther. This particular roller cam actually opens the valve
    nearly .100-inch farther and holds it open longer while maintaining
    smilar idle quality. Moreover, in many cases the extra lift is not
    detrimental to valve-to-piston clearance. Looking at each cam's rotated
    lift at TDC we find that the roller is only opening the valve .008-inch
    farther than the hydraulic during the period when the piston is hanging
    out in the vicinity. Hence, the benefits of street roller designs: Less
    friction, better fuel economy and more power while maintaining acceptable
    idle quality and low-speed driveability.

    While the aftermarket roller profiles all make use of mechanical
    roller tappets. Detroit's efforts have centered around the use of hydraulic
    rollers. Speed Pro, however, is on the verge of releasing a full line
    of hydraulic roller cams for a variety of performance engines. Mopar
    grinds are already in production Chevy and Ford cams should be around the
    first of the year. The cams incorperate all the aformentioned benefits of
    roller tappets, plus the added advantage of silent operation and valvetrain
    cushioning. They have been designed as direct replacment parts and should
    require no modifiaction for proper instillation.