Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Discussion Paper: what is humanism?.

by
Russell J. Stevens:
Faculty of Indigenous Research and Education (FIRE) Resource Management Student
E-mail: s970593@labnet.cdu.edu.au
CRS 200: Western Scientific Thought
Charles Darwin University
Lecturer: Markwell Durry
21st November 2004.


Introduction

Enlightentment and Humanism.

Enlightentment and Scientific Rationalism.

Humanism and Western Scientific Rationalism.

Conclusion

References

Introduction: A concept of humanism has been with humankind for at least three millennium. This phenomenon was significantly challenged by the transformation of a 'scientific revolution'. It was during this period that human life experiences saw new ideas emerge from a medieval world of superstition. Humanity's anthropocentric views of the universe were then to become an autonomy of reason, whilst the traditional Catholic perception of God turned into a 'nature of nature'. It was subsequently this phenomena that controlled humanity's social existence. A movement to humanize Christianity was the product of a Protestant development ethic, with the trappings of an investigative intellect and the enrichment of life. Alchemy was also in the process of a conversation to a scientific method. A relationship between humanism and scientific investigation was then a fore-gone conclusion. What then does this concept of 'humanism' mean and is it related in any way to humanity's perception of science?
Back to Contents

Enlightentment and Humanism: There is always confusion with definitions and associations between 'enlightenment' and 'humanism'. Whilst 'enlightenment' is a set of events within the development of European history, 'humanism' is a set of subject matter and arguments on social relationships emerging from 'enlightenment'. Humanistic views make a distinction between how humanity reacts to themselves within a historical context, whilst affected by a philosophical concept. However, humanism has an ill-defined agenda (Foucault, 1978, p. 1). and it cannot be said that humanistic values in today's society are characterized with clarity. Views on the concept of race, for example, can and often do have diverse meanings to different people. Humanism subsequently emerged as a conflict between Christianity and sets of thought developing outside of the 'faith', namely within 'enlightenment'.

Humanism is really a socio-political doctrine that is not restricted to the boundaries of one particular society. It is a cross-cultural concept with internal issues that cover and include all of humankind. In particular it deals with issues concerning human beings. Humanism relies to a large extent on reason and logic and definitely rejects concepts such as superstition and supernaturalism. However, most religions consider that they are humanist by nature, because their guiding policies are humane. Humanism is a general guiduing principal for life. It is not a concept that drives humankind's lifestyle as does the phenomenon of Scientific Rationalism.

Figure 1: humanism definitions for the enlightenment.


Literary Humanism:


Literary Humanism is a devotion to the humanities or literary culture.


Renaissance Humanism:


Renaissance Humanism is the spirit of learning that developed at the end of the middle ages with the revival of classical letters and a renewed confidence in the ability of human beings to determine for themselves truth and falsehood.


Cultural Humanism:


Cultural Humanism is the rational and empirical tradition that originated largely in ancient Greece and Rome, evolved throughout European history, and now constitutes a basic part of the Western approach to science, political theory, ethics, and law.


Philosophical Humanism:


Philosophical Humanism is any outlook or way of life centered on human need and interest. Sub-categories of this type include Christian Humanism and Modern Humanism.


Christian Humanism:


Christian Humanism is defined by Webster's Third New International Dictionary as "a philosophy advocating the self- fulfillment of man within the framework of Christian principles." This more human-oriented faith is largely a product of the Renaissance and is a part of what made up Renaissance humanism


Modern Humanism:


Modern Humanism is also called Naturalistic Humanism, Scientific Humanism, Ethical Humanism and Democratic Humanism is defined by one of its leading proponents, Corliss Lamont, as "a naturalistic philosophy that rejects all supernaturalism and relies primarily upon reason and science, democracy and human compassion." Modern Humanism has a dual origin, both secular and religious, and these constitute its sub-categories.


Secular Humanism:


Secular Humanism is an outgrowth of 18th century enlightenment rationalism and 19th century freethought. Many secular groups, such as the Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism and the American Rationalist Federation, and many otherwise unaffiliated academic philosophers and scientists, advocate this philosophy.


Religious Humanism:


Religious Humanism emerged out of Ethical Culture, Unitarianism, and Universalism. Today, many Unitarian- Universalist congregations and all Ethical Culture societies describe themselves as humanist in the modern sense.

To determine a real definition for the term 'humanism' however, is a very difficult task. The most comprehensive answer that I could find is listed in Figure 1 and compiled by the Executive Director, American Humanist Association. This reference's standing can encompass all fields of human endeavour.
Back to Contents

Enlightentment and Scientific Rationalism: The rationality of 'western science' is well documented and is sometimes understood as a twentieth century myth. It does not take into account all human experiences (Golding, 1997, p. 1), such as religious concepts and indigenous social models in the vein of Aboriginal Dreaming. Reason is not necessarily a sole source of knowledge, as some rationalists seem to think. Yet, as scientific rationalism emerged from and co-existed with Cultural Humanism in the 17th century, it now affects all western social living milieus. Western Scientific Rationalism however, is not the only source of knowledge available to humanity today. It is only a portion of a greater picture and should be understood as emerging from a cultural or pragmatic tradition, rather than from a spiritual source, or even a supernatural doctrine of thought.

Scientific rationalism and enlightenment had their origins within a pre-Socratic society of Ancient Greece, in a historical process, which changed the meaning of terminology. Consequently, the terms 'science' and 'knowledge' are related but have diverse and often obscure meanings (Hooker, 1999a, p. 1). Universal perception and philosophical thought is recognized as trends towards human origins and learning in an ancient Greek poem, Theogony written by Hesiod in about 705BC (Hooker, 1999b, p. 1), whilst science is recognised as having its beginnings with Aristotle's empiricism (Hooker, 1999c, p. 1), about a thousand years later.

As knowledge was reasoned from experience, Socrates built his knowledge on these, as well as the views of others and was well known for his observations on human ethics. He did not however, view the nature of 'a science' from the standpoint of a testable truth. He perceived it as a fundamental development of the intellect, as well as an awakening of an underlying condition of humanism (Tarnas, 2000, pp. 38). Plato and subsequently Aristotle began investigating the knowledge of their predecessors after a thousand years, whilst Greek philosophy and thought was taking on new meanings. As such Greek society slowly became humanistic by nature and the foundation of modern scientific rationalism took root.

The acceptance of a 'Western Science Rationality' took a step closed to reality during the 'Scientific Revolution' of the 1500's. Prior to this, scientific study and processes were deeply entrenched in Aristotelian philosophy (Rempel, 1998, p. 1), Christian doctrine (Layola University Libraries, 2001, p.1) and to an extent, alchemy. Moreover, there was always disagreement as to what true 'scientific investigation' was really about. The Scientific Revolution changed all that. This era of modern thinking began at the time of Copernicus as an advancement of the theory of a 'sun-centered universe', continued to the time of Newton and his 'mathematical universe' and is still in experience today as a Gatonian computer age. The Scientific Revolution is an era of change and a shift from a closed, supernatural view of the creation, to one of a mechanical view of a 'universe', rather than a 'cosmos'. This is a perception also taken by Outram in her essay about the Enlightenment, "What is Enlightenment?" Scientific thinking is no longer a source seeking meaning, but a phenomenon of human power over nature. (Outram, 1995, p. 9).
Back to Contents

Humanism and Western Scientific Rationalism: There are no scientific answers to questions regarding the origin of humanity, reasons for where the human race is in the scheme of events as well as where humankind is going. The only answers to these mysteries came from religious doctrine and the Church. They essentially were designed to exert power over the mass population and to keep them dominated. However, humanism is essentially a human attitude based on a scientific belief as to what science is and on how science progresses as it does. Moreover, if we are to believe that scientific research and method is a positive and valuable tool for finding the truth of existence, then we must believe that science is a basic structure of humanism.

Therefore a growth in humanism is an understanding of, as well as a belief in the rationality of science. One fundamental reason for science's existence is to be in opposition to various standpoints of supernatural experiences and to be aware of the natural order of human life. Yet, science does not believe claims of a supernatural assurance. This paradox remains today. In studying natural phenomenon and not just a religious explanation however, the scientific community began to understand a concept of evolution as a rational human experience. Charles Darwin later expanded and perfected this idea.
Back to Contents

Conclusion: Humanism has evolved as a set of ideas over at least three millennium, from the humble beginnings of relationships with an ancient Greek society, to the modern concept of human related powers, rather than supernatural or divine in nature beliefs. Scientific rationalism similarly evolved towards humankind's basing opinions on logical reasoning, knowledge and consistency, rather than emotional and/or religious responses. Humanism and western scientific rationalism are inter-related concepts in that humans have evolved into beings of benevolence, inherent with a logical intellect and a rational cultural outlook. ual landscape so much so that the gods of the Greeks and Romans were replaced with the Jewish 'one God' concept. Greek scientific methods were not really lost but were misplaced because Christianity then used Latin as a base for theological writings and Biblical and classical text was translated into Latin. It was however, mainly the Christian monasteries that translated Greek scientific text into Latin and most of all, a large portion of the Christian Bible or the New Testament that was also originally written in Greek.
Back to Contents

References

Edwords, Frederick. c1989. What is Humanism?
URL:
http://www.jcn.com/humanism.html
(Online: accessed 07 September 2004)
Back to Reference

Foucault, Michel, 1978. translation by Mathew Henson, 1992. What Is Enlightenment? (Was ist Aufklärung?).
URL:
http://eserver.org/philosophy/foucault/what-is-enlightenment.html
(Online: accessed 05 September 2004)
Back to Reference

Golding, P. H. 1997. Mysticism versus Freudian Psychiatry.University of Queensland.
URL:
http://www.innerharmony.aunz.com/MYSTICISM%20versus%20FREUDIAN%20PSYCHIATRY.htm
(Online: accessed 5 September 2004)
Back to Reference

Hooker, Richard. 1999a The Revelation of Saint John the Divine. 1: 8.
URL:
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/SCIENCE/CONTENTS.HTM
(Online: accessed 11th September 2004).
Back to Reference

Hooker, Richard. 1999b Greek Philosophy: pre-Socratic society.
URL:
http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/GREECE/PRESOC.HTM
(Online: accessed 11th September 2004).
Back to Reference

Hooker, Richard. 1999c The European Enlightenment: the scientific revolution.
URL:
http://www.wsu.edu:8000/~dee/ENLIGHT/SCIREV.HTM
(Online: accessed 11th September 2004).
Back to Reference

Layola University Libraries. 2001. Jesuits and the Sciences, 1540-1620.
URL:
http://libraries.luc.edu/about/exhibits/jesuits/1580.shtml
(Online: accessed 11th September 2004
Back to Reference

Mueller, Dr. Volker. n.d. (Translated by Mark R. Hatlie) New Thinking - or A Second Enlightenment for Free Thought and Human Rights
URL:
http://www.ibka.org/en/articles/ag02/mueller.html
(Online: accessed 05th September 2004).
Back to Reference

Outram, Dorinda. 1995. The Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne.
Back to Reference

Rempel , Gerhardt. 1998. The Scientific Revolution.
URL:
http://mars.acnet.wnec.edu/~grempel/courses/wc2/lectures/scientificrev.html
(Online: accessed 11th September 2004).
Back to Reference

Tarnas, Richard. 2000. The Passion of the Western Mind: understanding the ideas that have shaped our worldview. Random House Australia, Scoresby Vic.
Back to Reference

Go to the Top