Evil effects of Science
Thanks to science we live a better way of life, right? - wrong science has supposedly made our material life better but has brought us closer to Hell.
We have made numerous discoveries but what application have we put this knowledge to.
Points to Ponder
Who taught man to destroy himself a million times over.
Why is it that the humble fly and the mosquito have not been eradicated and people still die of Malaria. It is because research is not funded in this area but trillions of dollars go towards research in arms and newer ways of killing our fellowmen.
Why is there no cure for the common cold or herpes or aids or cancer though we have technology that can guide a satellite millions of miles out into outer space.
Who created the filth and garbage that reminds the world of the dark side of science
Who is polluting the earth, its air, its rivers, its human beings with millions of chemicals
Why and Who invented DDT, plastics and other unrequited stuff that we don't really need.
Why and who invented plastic explosives and what was the need for this.
Why are thousands upon thousands of people dying of cancer
Why are thousands upon thousands of people dying of heart related disease.
Why were our ancestors simple and happy while modern generations are confused and searching with all their technology.
When there were a few cars it was ok, now imagine 900,000,000 (900M) vehicles, ships, planes and engines burning out the precious oxygen and giving out smoke and pollution.
We have drugs that preserve life but who gave man the science to destroy himself with drugs.
HERE'S
some STATISTICS !
from
1965 to 1982 ( all figures approximate values )
Distinct Chemical Compounds formulated - 4,000,000
from 1982 new formulations created annually - 250,000
chemicals added to our foods - 3,000
chemicals found in drinking water - 700
chemicals identified in human tissue - 400
chemicals in laundries or under kitchen sinks in USA - 500
NEUROTOXIC chemical compounds in cosmetic & perfume industries -
800
Imagine all the engines were one engine,
what a big engine that would be,
and all the trees were one tree
what a big tree that would be.
The tree is the lungs of the world
and the engines are the cigarette
The earth smokes this cigarette
continuously day after day
month after month
year after year
and instead of getting smaller
this cigarette gets bigger and bigger
and the lungs smaller
till this big smoke
can no longer fill the small lung
and then...........
|
The Evil spin-offs of science far outnumber the good it does. |
Science is not scientific
Science indirectly tells us that what science cannot explain cannot exist or happen. In other words all phenomenon that science cannot explain does not happen and cannot exist. Science knows only the tip of the iceberg and scientists like Einstein realised this.
One would believe that science investigates and then reaches a conclusion. This is a total fallacy - The scientist reaches a decision beforehand and then works towards an explanation and not the other way around. Science is pre biased and prejudiced against religion. For eg. Billions of people down the ages have prayed and are praying and their prayers answered. Science regards these people as foolish simpletons and conveniently disregards all prayer as rubbish. There is no scientific study on this topic because in the scientific community prayer is regarded as foolishness and meant for country yokels. Instead of studying it they lay it to rest at passive insanity.
The greatest error of science says that it should be able to do experiments on things and phenomenon and the results should repeat themselves. This is true only for a very small amount of everyday earthly things. When we go on to global scales or astronomy or the supernatural one can no longer use this experimentation method one has to use the observation method of empirical situations. No one has seen an atom or an electron but we know that something exists that follows the laws and produces results. We know that the supernatural exists because of thousands of possessions and diabolic activity, we also know of benevolent forces that have often saved people from disaster. Scripture tells us clearly of angels and demons. Almost all the saints have had trysts with angels or demons or some supernatural personality. This in not only restricted to a saints but is seen from the beginning of creation till today.
Why then does science not accept God and the supernatural although there is more than required proof. How many scientists can you name that are religious? Satan wants to be in control but not be seen and this can be seen in his agents the Freemasons. Satan gives scientists and science a high-tech image while actually he holds them to ransom giving them knowledge of destruction.
Scientific spheres that come directly from Satan
|
Did you know the entire Jet Propulsion Laboratory is consecrated to Satan |
1. Nuclear Science
2. Genetic Engineering & Creationism
3. Psychology
4. War Science
Take the example of electricity.
Power stations produce millions of watts of electricity and destroy nature in the bargain and what for? To feed cities like Las Vegas with it's useless neon signs, gambling dens, prostitution dens, casinos and night life. Is all this necessary and needed for the existence of man. Did you know nuclear waste from power stations are packed in molten glass and buried underground thus polluting water tables and all that is underground.
Did you know that eating genetic engineered food can cause cancer?
Did you know that every day you imbibe hundreds of chemicals through all your foods.
Science has a preconceived notion that everything in the human being is caused by chemicals and not by any other factors. So religion and God plays no role in human beings, his feelings, evil traits et all are all caused by chemicals and chemicals only. Furthermore genetic engineering can save man and solve all his problems.