The GENERAL CONTEXT of such use is:
non-local point-location:
A 'Non-Local Point-Location' is a non-spacial, non-temporal, 'point' of interest or content/resource, occurring within a Condensate of Incorporeality that might be anywhere in the entire Cosmos!

Since the 'access' to such a 'non-local point-location' is exclusively via the quantum axion particle, as the 'collecting agent' for the 'dynamics' of a Condensate of Incorporeality elsewhere in the Cosmos, the 'Reality' of the situation, considering the very 'non-locality' of quantum axion particles themselves, is that an axion particle may be 'collecting' from one specific Level on that 'Non-Local Point-Location', and unbeknownst to that specific axion particle, another axion particle may be 'collecting input' from another Level of the very same 'Non-Local Point-Location'! In other words, the various Levels of any specific 'Non-Local Point-Location' may not be aware of the Existence and Activities of other Levels of that 'non-local point-location'!

However, if both axion particles are 'serving' and 'collecting' for the exact same Condensate of Incorporeality, they do have provision to recognize such 'duplicity' of 'input-collection' and will respectfully accord that specific 'input' to a single axion... UNLESS there is a difference, somehow, between the 'content' at differing Levels of that specific 'non-local point-location' (which may or may not be so!)