Media bias is nothing new
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
The American press has always been biased, misleading and in some cases prone to exaggeration to push its political agenda and increase its audience. During America’s Revolutionary War, newspapers used propaganda tactics of “name calling, fear mongering, demonizing the enemy,” and selective editing of battles to influence the public. In the 1890s, this type of exaggerating, misleading reporting was called “yellow journalism.” This sensationalist reporting on Cuba’s conditions in the 1890s helped induce a war between Spain and and United States.
Today, the media continues its bias, spinning stories to hurt President Trump. The media criticized Covington teens in Washington, D.C., then spun it to include Mr. Trump without waiting for the facts. Also, most mass shootings are spun to include an attack on Mr. Trump. On MSNBC, Harvard professor Laurence Tribe, who has promoted unreliable sources and conspiracy theories about Mr. Trump, invoked yellow journalism and made this outrageous prediction: President Trump “may fabricate another national emergency to remain in power after 2020.” Why is he still teaching?
Former President Carter confirmed media bias against Mr. Trump: “I think the media have been harder on Trump than any other president certainly that I’ve known about. I think they feel free to claim that Trump is mentally deranged and everything else without hesitation.”
Pew Research Center, studying the early days of Trump presidency, found that 62 percent of the coverage was negative and only 5 percent was positive. President Obama’s coverage in early 2009 was 42 percent positive and 20 percent negative. Pew said coverage of Mr. Trump was mainly on “character and leadership” versus policy, ignoring the positives of the Trump administration.
According to a recent Gallup poll, nearly two-thirds of Americans believe news outlet owners attempt to influence the way stories are reported, that there is too much bias in the reporting of news, and news outlets are being too dramatic or too sensational.
Some “news” outlets are shocked when they are called “biased,” “liberal propaganda” or “fake news.” But the above should leave little doubt about why the media is mistrusted.
CHRISTIAN GATSBY