Mood: not sure
Topic: Moorhead
He claims that he is the "candidate who believes in protecting your tax dollars" and that"who believes in limiting the size of government". Jim Soncrant. He believes it enough to have stuffed his name and his claims in my mailbox and my door.
Who is he? Why, he is the man who believes in limiting the size of government and protecting tax dollars. Who is he running against?
Well, if you read between the lines, he is running against a person who believes in giving away tax dollars through bloated government.
Wow, this is a guy who I have to vote for! Ideas! This is an idea man.
But what is he going to do? Like most candidates, Jim must want to keep it a secret, or, perhaps he doesn't want his secret plan to get out!
Let's see, limited government, low taxes. Hum, is he going to fire cops? Is he going to ask the chief of police to take a 20% cut in wages? How about the fire department, perhaps we can cut there. Roads, why we could do without snow removal. (Or are we merely going to freeze employee pay and cut benefits?)
Yes, this is a man we have to vote for. Imagine what he can do for us, for the City of Moor head. (And we have to imagine since he has not told us what he is going to do.)
Or is a conservative mantra enough? Tell people what they want to hear, tell them several times, and they will believe.
We certainly would not want Jim to tell the truth: that he has no real ideas, and that he will do the best he can (which is all he can do). No, the Jim's of the world don't get elected that way. They have to tell us about how American they are, or that they are loyal to a certain section of the community, or that they wear red white and blue socks.
There are people who really have ideas, and they have the ability to think. (Jim probably isn't one.) They are not afraid to talk about issues, and they trust the public enough to include the public in their discussions. Yes, there are. (They also make enemies with those who don't want anyone to think.)
Personally, I am not fond of government, nor do I like unfair taxation; but I realize that government and taxation are the cost of civilization. I would be happy to entertain the notion that we need less civilization and that we can find an enlightened tax formula.
A free zone: no cops, no firemen, no doctors, no ambulences, no schools, no jails. Yes, we could significantly cut local taxation if we just cut out a 15 block area and let anyone who lives there do whatever they want to whoever they want, as long as they stay within the neighborhood. Perhaps we could tax them, a city tax, for the privilege of living in the "free-zone". Hum, that might save us 15% and bring in another 10%.
But Jim, you have not sugested a "free zone" and I believe in civilization. All you have suggested is protecting tax dollars and limiting government.
Jim, if you want to modify my perception of an acceptable level of civilization I expect a debate on how and when. If not, don't ask for my vote.