Angelfire - Free Home Pages
The Supreme Law Firm
AltaVista - Search the Web
TaxGate
FRN's Exempt from State Taxation
My Objection to the use of FRN's
FRN's Exempt - Are You the
Voluntary Nature of Social Security
Letters to President Bush, et al
J.A.I.L for Iowa
LEVY AND DISTRAINT FROM CFR 2002
Organic Law Of Iowa
What Is Organic Law?
Admission of Iowa into the Union
brain·wash·ing, n. The application of a concentrated means of persuasion, such as an advertising campaign or repeated suggestion, in order to develop a specific belief or motivation.
"... Democracy is defended in 3 stages. Ballot Box, Jury Box, Cartridge Box." -- Ambrose Bierce
As long as the Matrix exists, the human race will never be free
Q-Are Federal Reserve Notes backed by anything?
A- by the assets of the Federal Reserve but, primarily by the power of congress to lay tax on the people.
Q- the power to collect taxes is what backs Federal Reserve Notes?
A- - Yes
DON'T YOU FEEL ALL WARM AND FUZZY NOW? FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES ARE BACKED BY THE POWER (not the legal authority - mind you) BUT THE BRUTE "POWER" OF CONGRESS TO LAY TAXES ON THE PEOPLE. (through mere deception, brainwashing, beliefs, etc...); IN OTHER WORDS, WE, THE PEOPLE OF OUR OWN COUNTRY, ARE BACKING THE FEDERAL RESERVES NOTES, AND ARE BEING TAXED BECAUSE OF IT! AREN'T WE JUST THE KINDEST FOLKS TO EVER WALK THE EARTH UPRIGHT? DUH.
QUOTE from the Declaration of Independence EXACTLY what our situation is today:
"...that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security."
We, dear Friends, are at the SAME POINT as the founding fathers of the united States of America. WE have a government that wishes to subjugate us under "absolute Despotism" and we have seen it with the Federal Reserve, the IRS, the bogus war on drugs which allows law enforcement to sneak into our homes and lives without search warrants, countless other government abuses, and now the Nazi Homeland Security office.
|
Word Study from Bouvier's 1856 Law Dictionary
"Truth / True" DEFINITION TRUTH. MAXIMS True Ex multitudine signorum, colligitur identitas vera. From the great number of signs true identity may be ascertained. Bacon's Max. in Reg. 25. Identitas vera colligitur ex multitudine signorum. true identity is collected from a number of signs. In conjunctivis oportet utramque partem esse veram. In conjunctives each part ought to be true. Wing. 13. In disjunctivis sufficit alteram partem esse veram. In disjunctives, it is sufficient if either part be true. Wing. 15. Juramentum est indivisibile, et non est admittendum in parte verum et in parte falsam. An oath is indivisible, it cannot be in part true and in part false. Longa possessio parit jus possidendi, et tollit actionem vero domino. Long possession produces the right of possession, and takes away from the true owner his action. Co. Litt. 110. Non accipi debent verba in demonstrationem falsam, quae competunt in limitationem veram. Words ought not to be accepted to import a false demonstration which have effect by way of true limitation. Bacons' Max. REg. 13. Omnis conclusio boni et veri judicii sequitur ex bonis et veris praemissis et dictis juratorem. Every conclusion of a good and true judgment arises from good and true premises, and the sayings of jurors. Co. Litt. 226. Quaeras de dubiis, legem bene discere si vis. Inquire into them, is the way to know what things are really true. Litt. 443. Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescere. What is not good in the beginning cannot be rendered good by time. Merl. Rep. verbo Regle de Droit. This, though true in general, is not universally so. Quod prius est verius est; et quod prius est tempore potius est jure. What is first is truest; and what comes first in time, is best in law. Co. Litt. 347. Ratio potest allegari deficiente lege, sed vera et legalis et non apparens. Reason may be alleged when the law is defective, but it must be true and legal reason, and not merely apparent. 6 Co. Litt. 191. Ultima voluntas testatoris est perimplenda secundum veram intentionem suam. The last will of a testator is to be fulfilled according to his true intention. Co. Litt. 322. Truth Contr veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. The law never suffers anything contrary to truth. 2 Co. Inst. 252. But sometimes it allows a conclusive presumption in opposition to truth. See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061. Error fucatus nud veritate in multis est probabilior; et saepenumero rationibus vincit veritatem error. Error artfully colored is in many things more probable than naked truth; and frequently error conquers truth and reasoning. 2 Co. 73. Fictio est contra veritatem, sed pro veritate habetur. Fiction is aginst the truth, but it is to have truth. Judicia sunt tanquam juris dicta, et pro veritate accipiuntur. Judgments are, as it were, the dicta or sayings of the law, and are received as truth. 2 Co. Inst. 573. Judicium semper pro veritate accipitur. A judgment is always taken for truth. 2 Co. Inst. 380. Justitia non novit patrem nec matrem, solum veritatem spectat justitia. Justice knows neither father nor mother, justice looks to truth alone. 1 Buls. 199. Nihil possumus contra veritatem. We can do nothing against truth. Doct. & Stu. Dial. 2, c. 6. Nimium altercando veritas amiltitur. By too much altercation truth is lost. Hob. 344. Perspicua vera non sunt probanda. Plain truths need not be proved. Co. Litt. 16. Praesentia corporis tollit errorem nominis, et veritas nominis tollit errorem demonstrationis. The presence of the body cures the error in the name; the truth of the name cures an error in the description. Bacon's Max. Reg. 25. Qui non libere veritatem pronunciat, proditor est verilatis. He who does not willingly speak the truth, is a betrayer of the truth. Recorda sunt vestigia vetustatis et veritatis. Records are vestiges of antiquity and truth. 2 Roll. R. 296. Reputatio est vulgaris opinio ubi non est veritas. Reputation is a vulgar opinion where there is no truth. 4 Co. 107. But see, Character. Res judicata pro veritate accipitur. A thing adjudged must be taken for truth. Co. Litt. 103; Dig. 50, 17, 207. See Res judicata. Sacramentum habet in se tres comites, varitatem, justitiam et judicium; veritas habenda est in jurato; justitia et justicium in judice. An oath has in it three component parts - truth, justice and judgment; truth in the party swearing; justice and judgment in the judge administering the oath . 3 Co. Inst. 160. Saepenumero uvb proprietas verboem attenditur, sensus veritatis amittitur. Frequently where the propriety of words is attended to, the meaning of truth is lost. 7 Co. 27. Veredictum, quasi dictum veritas; ut judicium quasi juris dictum. A verdict is, as it were, the saying of the truth, in the same manner that a judgment is the saying of the law. Co. Litt. 226. Veritas demonstrationis tollit errorem nominis. The truth of the demonstration removes the error of the name. Ld. Raym. 303. See Legatee. Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi. Truth fears nothing but concealment. 9 co. 20. Veritas nimium altercando amittitur. By too much altercation truth is lost. Hob. 344. Veritatem qui non libere pronunciat, proditor est veritatis. He who does not speak the truth, is a traitor to the truth. |
Consider a Temp Service who hires out employees for a "profit". They have a "gain" from those wages. INCOME FROM WAGES! Do You??
Isn't this the basis of what ALL the instructions for all the income tax forms tell us? Wages are Income. Income from Wages.
CONSIDER: In the instruction books for Form 1040A, where it says that: “You can use Form 1040A only if you had income from the following sources: Wages, salaries, tips (etc.)
1040A instructions tell us that wages are not subject to income taxes, they are sources of income. The 16th Amendment bars the government from taxing sources of income. It says Congress can tax “income, from whatever source derived”, so if wages are a source of income, and 1040A says so, only income derived from them is taxable.
READ the Instructions! Download the instructions from The IRS. Scroll down to the instructions for form 1040. You'll need the Acrobat Reader. Open up the file and click on "Edit", then "find". Type in the word "source". Hitting control-G will search the entire document for that word or whatever other word you choose.
You'll be surprised where these "words" the IRS rely on POP up! See if you can find anywhere where it says U.S. Citizens living and working in the United States.
Want more info?Click Here and read all about this FRAUD that has been perpetrated on ALL OF US!
An individual is not listed as being a “person” subject to criminal penalties for failure to file a return, failure to pay income tax, or any other tax law violation. Section #7343 states:
"The term ‘person’ as used in this chapter includes an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs."
Only those people who are required to act on behalf of a corporation or partnership, are listed as being a "person" subject to criminal penalties. If an individual is not in that capacity, he is not required to act and he cannot lawfully be subjected to any criminal penalties under the Code. Check it out for yourself. US Code Search
Ignorance is no excuse to GIVE AWAY your hard earned money to the abusive people that just want to spend, and spend, and spend, with NO regard for the PEOPLE that EMPLOYS THEM!
Ignorance also does NOT prejudice your RIGHTS!
If you wish to remain ignorant and believe the government is acting in your best interest, don't waste your time learning The Truth! After all, the government is spending all that money JUST for YOU.
RIGHT?
"TAXES FOR REVENUE ARE OBSOLETE"
Have you ever stopped to ask yourself this simple question: If the government can print as much money as it needs, then why is there an income tax?
In 1946, Beardsley Ruml - then Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of NYC, told the truth in a speech titled "Taxes For Revenue Are Obsolete".
Mr. Ruml explained (click here for Ruml's full speech) that, since a government can easily print all the paper money it needs, in any amount, and therefore does not need to tax anyone, an income tax is maintained to siphon excess paper out of circulation, to stabilize the purchasing power of paper money (i.e., regulate inflation) and prevent the hyperinflation that would ordinarily result from printing too much paper!
Now you know the truth behind the 'income tax'. Yet, not one American in a million heard Mr. Ruml's speech (And that is a good thing or they might have marched on Washington!).
Ample paper must continuously be taxed (siphoned) out of circulation to keep pace with the interest payments on the national debt, being made to the mostly foreign bankers who designed and control the Federal Reserve System.
*In 1982, the prestigious, private-sector Grace Commission, in their cost-cutting report to President Reagan, confirmed the ineptness of the income tax to control inflation. The following quote by the Commission confirms that they do not even understand how the income tax functions, and that the present rate of taxation does not pay the interest for the use of the money printed by the Federal Reserve Bank and thus cannot even begin to affect the growth of the national debt... "100% [of income taxes] collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt ... all income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from the government."
(This position has no semblance of reality with the position of the Federal Reserve Bank. Anyone care to guess why?)
Shocked? You should be! The Commission's report was apparently written to make certain that most hard-working Americans will never know, or even believe, the hidden connection between fraudulent paper money and the taxes they pay on their own labor (fraudulently seized from their paychecks and bank accounts by the Federal Reserve Bank's "strong arm" collection agency, the IRS).
Read Ruml's the full speech...click here.
The Two are on Different Subjects,
Collected by Different Collectors.
The first income tax is imposed at Subtitle A, Income Taxes.
The Second is imposed at Subtitle C, Employment Taxes.
Income subject to tax under Subtitle A is either: income derived from U. S. sources by nonresident aliens, or by certain American businesses deriving income from foreign sources. Withholding of income tax from payments of items of income under Subtitle A, is limited to those who are authorized and required to withhold, called “withholding agents”. Withholding agents’ instructions are found in Publication 515, Withholding of Taxes on Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Corporations. Although there is a tax on foreign income received by Americans, the withholding provisions of Subtitle A do not apply to such income.
Publication 515 does not refer to American citizens or businesses, except to state that its rules do not apply to them.
It says that if an individual furnishes a statement that he or she is a citizen or resident of the United States, not to withhold. It also says, “instead, get Publication 15, Circular E, Employer’s Guide to Withholding.” Note carefully that it does not refer to another publication that explains income tax withholding; it refers us to Employment tax withholding.
This should be a clear indication that income tax withholding is limited to nonresident aliens and foreign corporations. The law substantiates this position.
Circular E says that employers are required to withhold “income, FICA, and FUTA taxes” from employees, file 941’s and 945’s, 1099’s, etc. It says that there are two classes of employers- Federal Government Employers, and State and Local Government Employers. It refers to the taxes imposed under Subtitle C. We find that Subtitle C, at Section 3401(c) of the Code, defines “employee” for purposes of withholding income taxes, as someone who works for the government, hence his “employer” would have to be the government.
The Internal Revenue Code, a.k.a. Title 26 of the United States Code, is divided into Subtitles that deal with different subjects. Subtitle A deals with income taxes, Subtitle B with gift and estate taxes, Subtitle C with employment taxes, Subtitles D and E with excise taxes on cigarettes, liquor, petroleum, etc., and Subtitle F ,is Procedure. Subtitle C, Employment Taxes, shows an “income tax” at Chapter 24, that is unrelated to the Subtitle A income taxes. The two taxes have different origins, serve different purposes, affect different taxpayers, and are collected by different collectors.
This is as simple as it gets! Read the entire article in Layman's Terms
In the case of "Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co." (240 U.S. 103), the Supreme Court stated that the Sixteenth Amendment simply forbids the courts from ruling that the income tax is a "direct" tax, based on "the sources from which the income was derived," as happened in the Pollock case. The Court then said the following:
"Mark, of course,in saying this we are not here considering a tax... entirely beyond the scope of the taxing power of Congress, and where consequently no authority to imposea burden, either direct or indirect, exists.
In other words, we are here dealing solely with the restriction imposed by the 16th Amendment on the right to resort to the source whence an income is derived in a case where there is power to tax..." [Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916)]
This is Fundamental Law
Write Your Representatives Here!
1st Session
H. J. RES. 45
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish the Federal income tax.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 14, 1999
Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. PAUL, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. COX, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. PITTS, Mr. COOKSEY, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. CAMP, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. HERGER, Mr. LINDER, Mr. STUMP, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. DELAY, Mr. BONILLA, and Mr. SKEEN)
introduced the following joint resolution;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to abolish the Federal income tax.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:
`Article --
`SECTION 1. Three years after the ratification of this article of amendment, the sixteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed, and the Congress shall have no power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, except in time of war declared by the Congress.'
`SECTION 2. Not later than 180 days after the ratification of the article of amendment proposed by this joint resolution, the Secretary of the Treasury shall report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate recommendations for any legislation that may be necessary to implement that article.'
Shhhhhhh... it's a secret?
What's all the posturing over the President's tax cut if they're going to abolish the income tax anyway?
Don't the American People deserve some answers?
The Bill of Rights is "true for all men and all times" -- meaning that it's as valid and necessary today as when it was written.
|
Federalist Papers Bill of Rights U.S. Constitution House of Representatives Educational Resources Rush Limbaugh's Website Cherie's Home Page FindLaw NewsMax TaxSites |
|
Disclaimer:
The information contained herein is intended purely as a communication of information in accordance with the right of free speech. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. Anyone seeking such advice should consult a competent professional. If that's possible. Readers are specifically advised to pay all legal taxes they are subject to, and to obey all laws to the letter. Neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for the consequences of anyone acting according to the information in this report.
