WHY ARE THE MLICETS GMAT TEST PREP COURSES BETTER than the GMAT prep courses offered by Kaplan GMAT Prep (KAPTEST), Princeton Review, Veritas Prep, Manhattan GMAT, Manhattan Review, 800Score.com, Testmasters,Powerscore, and others? Also, VERITAS PREP's and MGMAT's deceptions uncovered. 

MLIC GMAT advantage -- Best training materials, best MBA instructors,best training methodology, and the most training hours of any GMAT course out there.

For starters, we 'coach and train' you in the GMAT assessment areas, using the latest GMAT problems, not some made-up or retired GMAT questions as Manhattan GMAT, Kaplan Prep, Veritas Prep, Princeton Review, and others do. Our goal-driven GMAT preparation courses will teach you relevant concepts and procedures required to shoot for and achieve a GMAT score of better than 700. Unlike the tutorial sessions run by Kaplan GMAT, Veritas Elite Prep , Princeton Review, Manhattan GMAT, and Manhattan Review, the MLICETS GMAT coaching courses will show you what it takes to achieve a GMAT score of better than 700 and make you demonstrate to your instructor that you have acquired and honed the skills in all Score-critical concept and procedural areas of GMAT, and provide customized help in your areas of weakness. We at MLIC do not leave it up to you to learn on your own as Kaplan GMAT, Princeton Review, Manhattan GMAT, and other me-too courses do. We compel you to show us that you have learned and honed the GMAT-critical procedural and conceptual skills required to get a GMAT score in the 90th percentile or better. We at MLIC are so confident that our coaching methodology is effective that we are willing to back up our training with the industry-leading GMAT Score Guarantee.

If you are not convinced that MLICETS is the best GMAT preparation option that is available to you consider this: we offer the most GMAT training course hours of any GMAT or GRE prep course out there: The MLICETS Turbo-Prep GMAT course features 40 hours of pre-GMAT-course work in the GMAT assessment areas, 42 hours of in-classGMAT-coaching support, and at least 40 hours of post-GMAT-course training involving additional   practice tests, and customzied exercises - For a whopping 120 hours of serious, no-nonsense GMAT training. Compare this to the pitiful 18 to 27 hours of useless Q&A sessions offered by Kaplan Prep (KAPTEST), Princeton Review, Manhattan GMAT, Manhattan Review, and other me-too GMAT prep programs. Veritas Elite GMAT prep company claims to offer between 36 and 42 hours of in-class training but have been known to scale back the number of in-class hours, as it did recently in Cincinnati, OH because its part-time instructor could not show up on Day 1. Do not be stood up; be wise and be trained -- choose MLIC.


All the other GMAT prep courses, such as the GMAT prep classes offered by Kaplan GMAT (KapTest), Princeton Review, Manhattan Review, Manhattan GMAT, Powerscore, Testmasters, and others, are essentially Self-study GMAT courses: They throw a bunch of less-than-half-decent GMAT-like books at you, show you some strategies and tricks during their in-class sessions, and ask you to work on your own for the most part. Veritas Prep, even though it claims to offer 42 hours of in-class sessions including about 3.5 hours of break during the sessions, does not require you to attend all its sessions and is, in essence, a program that relies on you to work through its prep materials on your own. MLIC GMAT Study and Training guides are the most thorough prep materials you can ever find for GMAT preparation and GMAT competency.
KAPLAN GMAT TEST PREP courses for the GMAT run typically 18 to 24 hours and use part-time student instructors some of whom may not have taken the actual GMAT. Kaplan Prep does not use real GMAT questions but instead uses its own 'made up' questions that rely excessively on cheap tricks that do not work most of the time, if at all. Kaplan instructors have been known to give the stock reply that 'Kaplan policy does not allow to teach you those problems or answer those questions.' The adaptive format the GMAT is not conducive to use of test-taking skills that rely on 'back-solving' and on 'tricks'. If you take away the 6 hours spent on 'practice tests' at the beginning and at the end of the 'course', the actual time spent in in-class sessions with Kaplan may not be more than 12 to 18 hours. Kaplan's "computer lab' is a joke. Rather than give you the CD containing the tests and having you take them at your home or office, Kaplan creates the illusion that it is actually providing value for your prep dollars by having you show up at its 'computer lab' to play with some useless tests. No one gets better by taking useless tests. MLIC actually trains you in GMAT assessment areas using questions appearing at high difficulty levels so that you can shoot for and reach a score of better than 700


PRINCETON REVIEW GMAT GMAT courses typically run for 24 hours, and uses franchised outlets over which it may not have any direct control. Princeton Review also relies on part-time instructors, most of whom are students who may not have taken the actual GMAT, and excessively relies on tricks to 'crack the GMAT'. Its training courses are meant to teach you at the level of 'Joe Blogg' and not at a level that is required to reach a score of better than 700. Princeton Review, like Kaplan Test prep, does not use the actual GMAT questions and trains you using some phony, made-up problems that are not representative of real GMaT questions. In short, Princeton Review GMAT course can actually do you more harm than good by letting you work on questions and passages that are not close to the real GMAT. Any company that charges you an arm and leg for 24 hours of useless tutorials such as the ones offered by PR must be doing itself a favor, not you a favor. Be wise. Choose MLIC GMAT prep.


MANHATTAN GMAT prep course appears to be the biggest 'all-missile-no-warhead' outfit out there, offering paltry 24 hours of tricks based tutoring for U$1,440 (after adjusting for the 3 hours of break during the 9-sessions) and relying on part-time instructors most of whom are non-MBA's (the instructor who teaches Manhattan GMAT course in New York City majored in linguistics and is an aspiring Hollywood screen-play writer; another instructor runs a puppy-mill from his bathroom). MGMAT has been known to switch your in-class registration to its pricey and useless virtual class if it cannot get sufficient number of people to enroll in its courses. Manhattan GMAT in-class sessions also appear to be disorganized; the instructor hops from Data Sufficiency to Critical Reasoning to Sentence Correction, all in the same session. Manhattan GMAT appears to rely on same training methodology as Kaplan and Princeton Review do, and merely teaches you some tricks, shows you you some 'key' problems to explain its tricks, and then lets you go to work on your own in clueless serendipity. When you show up for the next session, your homework tasks may not be reviewed, no question and answer session held, and the likely non-MBA instructor will move on to another round of amuse-bouche - moving from Reading Comprehension tricks to Problem solving to whatever the heck the instructor feels like. This methodology is not conducive to helping you develop a solid grip on the GMAT assessment areas, and cannot be effective. Manhattan GMAT is the only company on the block that does NOT believe that its training methodology works so much so that it does NOT offer any sort of guarantee to back up its training. In fact, Manhattan GMAT has the philosophy that if you did not do well on the test, then you are to blame for not controlling your nerves or for not applying its tricks. As Tate Shafer, one of the non-MBA instructors for MGMAT put it, if you did not do well after Manhattan GMAT training with its tricks, then you alone are to blame for the debacle. Manhattan GMAT appears to be a hyped up 'take the money and run' operation out there in the marketplace, blaming the 'victim'. Its potential instructors are 'trained' by 'sitting in on' the courses 'taught' by other instructors for the most part. Then they are required to do an audition to show that they can rattle out the talking points to be anointed 'instructors for MGMAT'. MGMAT also requires that its trainee instructors GUEST-TEACH a class, using YOU as the guinea-pig for the training of someone who may not even be hired. Do you want to be used as guinea-pig by a company that does not back up its GMAT training with any sort of post-course guarantees? MGMAT's claim that it hires only those who have scored in the 99th percentile on a GMAT test after rejecting 4 out of 5 aspirants sounds fraudulent. Firstly, 99th percentile scorers wanting to teach for MGMAT is not unlimited, and it does not haveow that passes for GMAT preparation? GMAT tests critical reasoning - Think critically and do not be suckered into buyng the phony claims by MGMAT. In sum, Manhattan GMAT offers you 24 hours of 'tricks' sessions, does not believe in its training methodology to offer you a guarantee of any kind, offers no training in pacing critical to doing well in a time-critical GMAT environment, and features sloppy in-class training schedule that jerks you around from one GMAT section to another. In Contrast, MLIC offers you 120-hours of goal-driven and skill-enhancing GMAT prep courses that are backed by the industry-leading GMAT Score Guarantee™. Be informed. Be smart. Choose MLIC for serious, no-nonsense, kick-ass coaching in GMAT assessment areas.


VERITAS ELITE GMAT PREP appears to be the state of the art in ultimate deception. Its GMAT course materials are recycled retired GMAT questions, and its practice tests are the same ones you can buy from 800Score.com and Arco. Veritas Prep makes blatantly fraudulent claims on its website as explained below, and you should think twice before enrolling in its hyped up but useless GMAT courses. Veritas is also the only GMAT prep company that hires its 'instructors' mostly on the basis of resumes and phone interviews, and sends them out to teach with no formal training. (Veritas 101 that it advertises is a joke: it involves the sight-unseen instructors watching videos to learn the so-called 'Veritas Method', which is not much of a method at all. Veritas Prep recruits its part-time, hourly-rates-paid instructors by running ads in forums such as Craig's list with the nonchalance of people who post ads for 'casual encounters' and in Vault job boards, and does not require that its instructors have 'teaching experience' (although it simply 'prefers it'). Veritas' training involves having its potential instructors watch a video of its methodology and then show up to 'teach' the class. MLIC believes that such a recruitment and training process used by Veritas Prep cannot ensure the quality of training that it claims that it delivers. Veritas Prep also makes claims on its web-site that are provably false. Let us expose four of those deceptions:


VERITAS DECEPTION 1: Veritas Prep cleverly mentions '99th percentile' against the names of 'its faculty' appearing on its web-page. It does not state that they have scored in the 99th percentile on the GMAT. They could have scored in the 99th percentile on the SAT or on the LSAT or in one of the two assessment sections of the GMAT. The company's ad in Craig's list (that appears with the regularity of postings by a pretentious guy who cannot hold on to his girl friends) merely requires of its potential instructors a 99th percentile score in any of the GMAT sections. Participants who took Veritas Prep's GMAT course at Tysons Corner, Virginia recently have reported that the instructor who taught the course admitted to the class that he had not taken the GMAT ever. Other participants who took the Veritas course in Philadelphia recently have reported that the instructor who taught the course claimed that he had scored 740 on the GMAT, a score that is not sufficient to place him the 99th percentile. The ins