Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
wwwritersside.jpg Design by Visions of Adonai
Go to Main Page Recommended Links View Our Guestbook Sitemap
Business Writing & Research Website Writing & Research General Writing & Research Frequently Asked Questions Samples of Our Writing Initiate a Contract Place an Order Win an Award! Awards We Have Won!

Thesis Proposal Sample

The Effect of Classroom Management on
High School Academic Achievement


by June Kaminski, RN MSN

Classroom management first became a popular topic in education during the 1970's and 1980's, (Tavares, 1996 and Butchart, 1995). The focus in these early years was primarily on behavior management, used to control and shape students' behavior to conform to school rules. Consequences, rewards and punishment were used to guide students to conform to the rules chosen by the classroom teacher. Classroom management using an authoritarian or punitive approach did repress disorderly behavior, but it did not foster student growth or allow the acquisition of more sophisticated modes of learning, such as critical thinking and reflection (Jones, 1995).

In the 1990's, a new paradigm of classroom management emerged, based on the democratic process, humanism, and consideration for diversity. Classroom management developed beyond a set of educational techniques to become ",...a complex process in which an environment is constructed in an ongoing, reciprocal manner," (Adler, 1996, p.34). This process included dialogue between teachers and students, reflection on past and current experiences, and looking at how one's behavior affected others in the environment (Schneider, 1996). Rules were mutually agreed upon by the entire class, making them socially valid to the students which provided structure, and helped to develop a productive classroom environment (McGinnis, 1995).

Classroom management in high schools often lagged behind strategies used in elementary school classrooms. All too often, classroom management systems built on trust, caring, and support in the lower grades were replaced with compliance and obedience systems once a student entered high school, (Freiberg, 1995). Even in the 1990's, the majority of high school classrooms have been managed by models of teacher control and student obedience.

Sheets and Gay (1996), described the widespread discipline problems and disruptive behaviors common in high school classrooms. Overcrowded classrooms, made up of diverse groups of students of varying ethnicity and socioeconomic characteristics, showed extreme levels of disruptions. Canter (1997) estimated that high school teachers spent thirty to fifty percent of their in-class time handling behavior problems. Most of these problems were relatively minor disruptions which originated in the classroom, and were often interpersonal in nature. The disruptive student might ",....challenge teacher authority, interrupt, talk out of turn, respond loudly, argue, react emotionally, or socialize in class, (Sheets and Gay,1996, p.86)

Silencing and control of the student's behavior have routinely been used to deal with disruptive situations by removing students from the class, along with verbal reprimands, intimation, or demands for compliance. High school students often reacted to the teachers' attempts at behavior management by responding aggressively, or by employing silence and absence strategies. The student often withdrew from classroom discussions, neglected their assignments, cut class, were truant which usually led to suspension or even expulsion from the school. These subsequent behaviors inevidently led to low academic achievement, and feelings of powerlessness and helplessness in the student.

To break this cycle of teacher control and student compliance patterns, a proactive classroom management process was adopted by some teachers, (McGinnis, 1995). The proactive process focused on fostering student involvement and cooperation in decision-making, setting ground rules, and problem-solving to establish a productive learning environment. Involved students appreciated the classroom environment when they felt accepted as individuals with unique differences and worthwhile opinions. Classroom management which was culturally responsive, and based on developing connectedness and community fostered more class participation, self-discipline, and higher expectations by both the students and the teacher. Teachers who managed democratic, cooperative classrooms enjoyed students who were more involved, responsible, and academically successful, (Evans, 1996, and Freiberg, 1995).

Freiberg, (1995) described multiple studies done in Texan schools ranging from kindergarten to grade 12 (with a total of more than 10,000 students) that incorporated democratic, caring classroom management strategies. These schools had forty to sixty percent less discipline referrals to the principal's office, and the students made statistically significant gains in achievement, even winning awards for the first time, for academic excellence. Democratic classroom management was viewed as a positive process, affirmed the students' individuality, set mutual realistic classroom limits and guidelines, and built cooperation without using coercion (Chemlynski, 1996). A democratic social environment in the classroom gave the students the opportunity to pursue academic goals and to create mutually agreed upon standards for academic and behavioral performance (Wentzel, 1989).

The literature seems to suggest that democratic, humanistic classroom management fosters higher academic achievement. Research to investigate this relationship could spark more interest in using democratic management strategies in high school classrooms.

Problem Statement

Classroom management based on coercion and behavior control is linked to retaliatory behavior disruptions leading to conflict, punishment, and substandard academic achievement. Classroom management based on democratic, humanistic processes is linked with greater student participation, cooperation, and motivation to achieve academically. High schools are routinely managed by teacher control and student compliance models. Further research that supports the use of a democratic classroom management paradigm could help educators to understand the potential link with academic achievement.

Purpose

The purpose of this research study is to determine whether high school students in well - managed classrooms experience greater academic achievement than students in poorly - managed classrooms.

Hypothesis

High school students in well-managed classrooms experience significantly greater academic achievement than students in poorly - managed classrooms.

Null Hypothesis

High school students in well-managed classrooms do not experience significantly greater academic achievement than students in poorly - managed classrooms.

Operational Definitions

Well - managed Classroom. Proactive, democratic, humanistic classroom environment in which the teacher and students mutually set rules that are conducive to cooperative and relevant learning. Learning experiences are planned, incorporating cultural context, diversity, and allowing for a variety of individual and group processes. Intrinsic motivation and self-discipline are cultivated using encouragement, caring, and collaboration.

Poorly - managed Classroom. Teacher controlled environment structured to elicit student compliance to fixed rules, often through coercion. Authoritative management used to enforce classroom structure, using reward and punishment in response to student behaviors. Extrinsic motivation and external discipline applied using praise or reprimand, silencing, and isolation tactics to remove disruptive students from the classroom environment.

Academic Achievement. Evidence of knowledge acquisition, literacy, and learning assessed through student assignments, class participation, test scores, and individual and cumulative grades.

Methodology

Sample. High school students, from grade nine to twelve, primarily in North American schools, who have participated in published studies selected from the education literature.

Research Design. A meta-analysis research design will be used to integrate the findings from several studies, selected from journal articles, books, theses, dissertations, and investigator - generated databases. The outcomes of the selected studies will be described and statistically calculated. to summarize the effect of classroom management on high school academic achievement. A meta-analysis design was chosen because it allows for generalizations across studies, and can reveal useful patterns in the combined study data (Glass, 1981).

Data Collection . Outcome and raw data will be collected from published studies to compare the effect size of the academic achievement of students in well - managed classrooms with students in poorly - managed classrooms.

Data Analysis. Descriptive and parametric statistics will be calculated and summarized. A one-tailed t -test with a 0.05 level of significance and a power of .80 will be calculated to determine if a significant difference in the dependent variable, (academic achievement) occurred in high school students from well-managed classrooms compared to students from poorly- managed classrooms (independent variables).

References

Adler, S. A., (1996). On case method and classroom management Action in Teacher Education, 18, Fall , 33-43.

Albert, .L. (1989). A teacher's guide to cooperative discipline. :American Guidance Service.

Albert, L. (1995). Discipline. Is it a dirty word? Learning, 24, September, 43-6.

Blumenfeld-Jones, D. S.(1996). Conventional systems of classroom discipline (the patriarchy speaks). Journal of Educational Thought, 30(1), April, 5-21.

Brown, B. B., & Steinberg, L. D. (1990). Academic achievement and social acceptance. The Education Digest, 55, March, 57-60.

Burden, P. R.& Fontana, D. (1996). Classroom management and discipline (BOOK REVIEW). The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, June, 268-70.

Butchart, R. E.(1996).Discipline, dignity, and democracy: Reflections on the history of classroom management. Educational Studies (American Educational Studies Association), 26, Fall, 165-84.

Byrne, B. M. (1990). Self-concept and academic achievement: Investigating their importance as discriminators of academic track membership in high school. Canadian Journal of Education, 15, Spring, 173-82

Calabrese, R. L.(1989). Student alienation and academic achievement The Education Digest, 54, May, 7-9.

Canter, L. (1996). First, the rapport-- then, the rules. Learning , 24, March/April , 12+.

Canter, L. (1997). Behavior management: Keeping up with the times Learning, 25(4), January/February, 28-9+.

Castejon, J. L., & Vera-Munoz, M. I. (1996). A causal model about the individual and contextual determinants of academic achievement. The High School Journal, 80,(1), October/November, 21-7. Chilcoat, G.W.(1988). Student achievement with verbal feedback. NASSP Bulletin, 72, April, 8-13.

Clarke, M.A., Davis, A., Rhodes, L.K., & Baker, E. (1996). Creating coherence: High achieving classrooms for minority students [Final report of research conducted under U.S. Department of Education, OERI. Achieving Classrooms for Minority Students (HACMS), Field Initiated Studies Program. Denver, Colorado: University of Colorado at Denver.

Cochran, K. H. (December, 1983). Prescription for discipline. Music Educators Journal, 32-36.

Cool, V. A., & Keith, T. Z.(1991). Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, (1), January, 28-44.

Curwin, R., & Mendler, A. (1988). Discipline with dignity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Dar, Y., & Resh, N. (1986). Classroom intellectual composition and academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, Fall, 357-74.

DeLucia, R., & Iasenza, S.(1995). Student disruption, disrespect, and disorder in class: A seminar for faculty. Journal of College Student Development, 36, July/August, 385-8.

DeNofa, W.J., (1993). The effects of intervention on the academic achievement of at-risk students in secondary schools. The High School Journal, 76, February/March, 215-20.

Digiulio, R.C. (1995). Positive classroom management : A step-by-step guide to successfully running the show without destroying student dignity . New York: Corwin.

Dodge, E. R. (1975). High School Classroom Control. Today's Education, 64, ( 2), 58-60.

Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M.C. Wittrock, (Ed.) Handbook on Research on Teaching. New York: MacMillan, p. 1-21. Duke, C. R.(1988). Giving the competitive edge to students' academic achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 72, April, 1-7

Duke, D.(1979). Classroom Management. The seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Distributed for the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago,IL:The University of Chicago Press.

Ellis, J. (1997).What a seriously at-risk student would really like to say to teachers about classroom management. Education Canada, 37, Summer, 17-21.

Ennis, C. D.(1996). When avoiding confrontation leads to avoiding content: Disruptive students' impact on curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 11, Winter, 145-62.

Evans, T. D.(1996). Encouragement: The key to reforming classrooms. Educational Leadership, 54, September, 81-5.

Foley, R. M., & Epstein, M. H. (1992). Correlates of the academic achievement of adolescents with behavioral disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 18, November, 9-17.

Freiberg, H.J., Steen, T.A., & Huang, S. (1995). The effects of a classroom management intervention on student achievement in inner city elementary schools. Education Research and Evaluation, 1, (1), 36 - 66.

Freiberg, H.J. (1996). From tourists to citizens in the classroom Educational Leadership, 54, September, 32-6.

Freiberg, H.J., & Driscoll, A. (1996) Universal teaching strategies, 2nd Ed. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

Gaddy, G. D.(1988). High school order and academic achievement American Journal of Education, 96, (4), August, 496-518.

Gathercoal, F. (1990). Judicious discipline. The Education Digest, 55(6), 20-24.

Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Glasser, W. (1984). Control theory in the classroom. New York: Harper and Row.

Gossen, D.C. (1992). Restitution: Restructuring school discipline. Chapel Hill, NC: New View.

Gunter, P. L., & Denny, R. K. (1996), Research issues and needs regarding teacher use of classroom management strategies. Behavioral Disorders, 22, (1), November, 15-20.

Haigh, G. (1996). In the natural order of things. The Times Educational Supplement, no: 4196, November 29 , supp. 4-5.

Hoy, W. K., & Forsyth, P. B. (1986). Effective supervision: Theory into practice. New York: Random House.

Hunter, M. (1976). Improved instruction. El Segundo, CA: TIP Publications.

Hutchins, C. L. et al. (1991). Achieving excellence: An educational decision-making and management system. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.

Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms .2nd Ed. New York: Teachers College Press.

Johnson, T. C., Stoner, G., & Green, S. K.(1996). Demonstrating the experimenting society model with classwide behavior management intervention. The School Psychology Review, 25 (2), 199-214.

Jones, V. F., Jones, L. S., & Hughes, S.(1996).Comprehensive classroom management (BOOK REVIEW) Educational Horizons, 74(2), Winter, 51-3.

Kinney, P., & Miller, M. J.(1988). The relationship between self-esteem and academic achievement. College Student Journal, 22, Winter, 358-62.

Kliebard, H. M., & Stone, C. R.(1992). One kind of excellence: Ensuring academic achievement at La Salle High School. The High School Journal, 76, October/November, 46-59.

Kohn, A. (1995).Discipline is the problem-- not the solution. Learning, 24, October/November, 34.

Kraut, H. (1996) Teaching and the art of successful classroom management: A how-to-guide for teachers in secondary schools.: New York: AYSA.

Lazarowitz, R., Hertz, R. L., & Baird, J. H. (1988). Academic achievement and on-task behavior of high school biology students instructed in a cooperative small investigative group. Science Education, 72, July, 475-87.

Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C. & Hammond, K. M. (1991). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. In U. Casanova, D.C. Berliner, P. Placier, & L. Weiner (Eds.). Classroom management: Readings in educational research (pp. 22-62). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

Lenarduzzi, G., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1995).The longitudinal effects of non-promotion in junior high school on academic achievement and attendance Education , 113, Fall , 112-14.

Lenarduzzi, G.P., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1995).The effects of non-promotion in junior high school on academic achievement and scholastic effort. Reading Improvement, 27, Fall, 212-17.

Lewis, C.C., Schaps, E., & Watson, M.S. (1996) The Caring Classroom's academic edge, Educational Leadership, 54, September, 16 - 21.

Lowe, R. B., & Seay, M. L.(1996). Discipline plan needs teamwork, consistent tact. School Administrator, 53, February, 36+.

Marsh, H. W. (1990). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multi-wave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, December, 646-56.

Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., Arredondo, D. E., Blackburn, G. J., Brandt, R. S., & Moffett, C. A. (1992). Dimensions of learning: Teacher's manual. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Mboya, M. M.(1989). The relative importance of global self-concept and self-concept of academic ability in predicting academic achievement. Adolescence, 24, Spring, 39-46.

McGinnis, J.C., Frederick, B.P., & Edwards, R. P. (1995). Enhancing classroom management through proactive rules and procedures. Psychology in the Schools, 32, July, 220-4.

McWilliam, E. (1996).Corporate realities in the classroom, English Education, 28, December, 340-8.

Mendler, A. N.(1996). Discipline with dignity: an approach for the '90s Learning, 24, January/February, 16-17.

National Education Service. (1994, Fall). Discipline Profiles. Teaching Kids Responsibility, 1(1), 1-2.

Natriello, G., Pallas, A. M., & Alexander, K. L.(1989).On the right track? Curriculum and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, April, 109-18.

Palardy, J. M. (1996). Taking another look at behavior modification and assertive discipline. National Association of Secondary School Principals - NASSP Bulletin, 80, September, 66-70.

Pearson, L. C., & Banerji, M. (1993). Effects of a ninth-grade dropout prevention program on student academic achievement, school attendance, and dropout rate. The Journal of Experimental Education, 61, Spring, 247-56.

Pinero, U.C. (1985).What do we know about well-managed classrooms? Instructor, 94, February, 14-15.

Randolph, C. H., & Evertson, C. M.(1995). Managing for learning: Rules, roles, and meanings in a writing class. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 30, (2), Summer, 17-25.

Randolph, W. A. (1985). Understanding and managing organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Rindone, P. (1988).Achievement motivation and academic achievement of Native American students. Journal of American Indian Education, 28, October, 1-8.

Schneider, E. (1996). Giving students a voice in the classroom. Educational Leadership, 54, September, 22-6.

Sheets, R. H.& Gay, G. (1996).Student perceptions of disciplinary conflict in ethnically diverse classrooms. National Association of Secondary School Principals - NASSP Bulletin, 80, May, 84-94.

Short, P. M., Short R. J., & Blanton, C. (1994). Rethinking student discipline. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Smith, T. E. (1990).Time and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, December, 539-58

Solomon, D., Watson, M. S., Delucchi, K. L., Schaps, E., & Battistich, V. (1991).

Enhancing children's pro-social behavior in the classroom. In U. Casanova, D. C. Berliner, P. Placier, & L. Weiner (Eds.). Classroom management: Readings in educational research (pp. 186-212). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

Stewart, S. C., Evans, W. H., Kaczynski, D. J.(1997). Setting the stage for success: Assessing the instructional environment. Preventing School Failure, 41, Winter, 53-6.

Stinnett, T. A., Oehler-Stinnett, J., & Stout, Larry J. Development of the Teacher rating of academic achievement motivation: TRAAM. The School Psychology Review, 20 (4), 609-22.

Tavares, H. (1996).Classroom management and subjectivity: A genealogy of educational identities. Educational Theory, 46, Spring, 189-201.

Teasley, A. B. (1996).Dealing effectively with student behavior. English Journal, 85(14), April, 80-1.

Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1997) Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: A re-examination of their relationship. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, June,199-212.

Totten, S.(1995). Middle level education: An annotated bibliography. .Westport, CT:Greenwood .

Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E., & Gagnon, C. (1995). Teacher ratings of children's behaviors and teachers' management styles: A research note The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 36, July, 887-98.

Vollmer, F. (1986). The relationship between expectancy and academic achievement: How can it be explained? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, February, 64-74.

Wade, R. K. (1997) Lifting a school's spirit. Educational Leadership, 54, May, 34-6.

Weade, R., & Evertson, C. M. (1991). The construction of lessons in effective and less effective classrooms. In U. Casanova, D. C. Berliner, P. Placier, & L. Weiner (Eds.). Classroom management: Readings in educational research (pp. 136-159). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

Weinstein, C.S., & A. J. Mignano, Jr. (1997).Elementary classroom management: Lessons from research and practice, 2nd Ed. New York:McGraw-Hill.

Welch, O. M., Hodges, C. R., & Warden, K. (1989). Developing the scholar's ethos in minority high school students: The vital link to academic achievement. Urban Education, 24, April, 59-7.

Wentzel, K. R.(1989). Adolescent classroom goals, standards for performance, and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, June, 131-42.

Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social competence at school: Relation between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, (1), Spring, 1-24.

Winitzky, N., & Kauchak, D. P. (1995).Learning to teach: Knowledge development in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, May, 215-27.

Wolfgang, C. H., & Kelsay, K. L. (1995). Discipline and the social studies classroom, grades K-12. The Social Studies, 86, July/August, 175-82.

Young, M. E.(1995). Using an interpersonal approach for developing positive classroom management. Education , 116, Winter, 302-4+.

Zabel, R.H., & Zabel, M.K. (1995).Classroom management in context: Orchestrating positive learning environments New York:Houghton Mifflin.


Site is optimized for all browsers - for screen resolution 800x600 - for 16 bit or better color.
WWWriters - 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 - All rights reserved.