The Spirit of 76
by Daniel Brook of the Philadelphia
Citypaper
October 18–25, 2001
Fans of the
Center City bus route fight to stop its elimination.
Magic bus: The
route 76 line may cost SEPTA more to run than other lines, but proponents say
it serves senior citizens.
SEPTA’s proposal
to turn the 76 bus route into a Center City "shopper’s loop," met
substantial resistance at a public hearing Oct. 10. Senior citizens, public
transit passenger representatives, and affected businesses and institutions each
took their turn giving SEPTA a piece of their mind.
The 76 bus,
known in cheeky SEPTA parlance as the "Ben Frankline," runs from
Penn’s Landing to the Philadelphia Zoo, connecting Center City with the museums
that line the Ben Franklin Parkway. According to SEPTA officials, despite
efforts to promote the route, ridership is too low to justify continued
service. Efforts to increase use have included the special name and a unique
red, white and blue schedule that Christopher Zearfoss of the Mayor’s Office of
Transportation described as "quite eye-catching." Despite these
efforts, SEPTA’s analysis found that the subsidy per passenger on the 76 bus is
more than three times the system average, making it too inefficient to merit
continued service.
Many riders
present at the hearing opposed any changes to 76 service. Ajay Creshkoff, a
retired economist who lives in Center City, urged SEPTA to look beyond the
bottom line and "examine the human costs." Creshkoff said that the 76
bus provides an important service to senior citizens and the disabled since,
unlike most bus routes which serve the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the 76 bus
drops off passengers at the building’s west entrance. Other buses use stops
that require riders to cross wide, busy streets and climb the museum’s famous
steps. Creshkoff noted in his testimony to SEPTA that the seniors refer to the
Art Museum’s location as "cardiac hill."
Lorraine Brill,
the president of the Delaware Valley Citizens’ Transportation Committee and a
senior citizen, encouraged SEPTA to keep the 76 route intact but to market it
more effectively. She claimed that since 1999 the 76 route has actually been
gaining riders. If SEPTA publicized the route in the Metro newspaper, she
suggested, ridership would increase further. Brill said the proposed shopper’s
loop would provide redundant service since Walnut, Chestnut and Market streets
in Center City comprise the best-served area in the whole SEPTA bus system. In
a theatrical move, Brill presented the SEPTA official presiding over the
hearing with 8 bus schedules— "evidence" that the area is already
well served.
Another senior
citizen, Herbert Sharp, submitted a petition he had organized at his Center
City apartment building, Kennedy House. More than 200 residents signed his petition
to keep 76 bus service in tact.
While many
riders objected to the proposed changes, SEPTA had lined up some institutional
support. The Center City District (CCD), Philadelphia’s downtown business
improvement district, strongly backed SEPTA’s proposal. The new shopper’s loop
would give a boost to downtown retailers during the coming Christmas shopping
season. At the hearing, CCD Executive Director Paul Levy said his organization
would raise funds to "wrap" the buses with ads, and subsidize fares
at certain times of year.
Not everyone at
the hearing was as pleased as Levy. Cynthia M. Philo, executive director of the
Old City District, objected that the Center City shopper’s loop wouldn’t serve
Old City or the shops on South Street. SEPTA should "market the city as a
whole as a shopping destination," she said. While Philo was not against
modifying the 76 route, she hoped any route specially designated for shoppers
would serve the part of the city she represents.
One constituency
that was particularly worried about the proposed changes was commuters on the
Art Museum staff. According to Robert Morrone, the Art Museum’s facilities and
operations director who represented the museum at the hearing, 20 percent of
the staff uses public transportation each day. In addition, members have been
calling the museum worried about the discontinuation of 76 bus service, he
said. While Morrone did not have any specific recommendations to make, he urged
that SEPTA keep the museum easily accessible by mass transit.
SEPTA’s response
to riders worried about museum and zoo access from Center City was that they
use the Phlash bus. Steven R. D’Antonio, who represented SEPTA office of New
Service Initiatives at the hearing, said that plans were being made to extend
the Phlash route to serve the zoo.
This proposed
solution did not satisfy riders at the hearing. Since the Phlash route snakes
its way through Center City to serve hotels, city residents felt it is a poor
choice for native Philadelphians. Another sticking point was the Phlash fare
structure of $2 one-way, $4 for an all-day pass. Since Phlash doesn’t accept
SEPTA tokens or passes, Creshkoff and others said it represents an
inconvenience and potential added expense for regular SEPTA riders. This was
particularly problematic for senior citizens who ride free on SEPTA during
off-peak hours, but receive no discount on Phlash.
One look at a
map and schedule of the current 76 bus route, explains why it suffers from low
ridership. The 76 bus route is one of the shortest in the city and doesn’t
serve any major residential neighborhoods. This being the case, the line cannot
attract the masses of commuters who make up the majority of city bus riders.
People travel to and from work every day, but even an avid museum-goer may only
visit the Philadelphia Museum of Art a few times a year. Since the route serves
important historical and cultural sites in the city, perhaps it should be
preserved, but extended through residential neighborhoods at one or both ends
to create a base of commuters.
Few
Philadelphians think their transit system is perfect the way it is, but many
feel the proposed change to the 76 route would make the system worse, not
better. SEPTA’s motto is "Serious About Change." Apparently the devil
is in the details.