| Covenant
Keepers Enterprises, LLC J. C. Chisum, Consultant 5804 W. Vista Ave. #347 -
Glendale, Arizona 85301
COVENANT KEEPERS NEWSLETTER Volume 7 Issue 2 October 1999 |
||
| Traveling Road Show
During October some of you will have trustee meetings; and others will just be visited. The Chisum Clan is hitting the road and has a very ambitious intention of visits across the country. If you want a special visit you could bribe us to stop along our way to visit you money counts and this is not part of routine trustee fees. Actually we will have some specific limits on our ability to cover everyone and will do our best to see all those it has been too long since your last visit to us or our visit to you. You may get short notice to get to a place as near as we can accommodate; I would like to visit all my businesses and practices but am afraid I would be gone too long and others might figure out they can change their own diaper and wipe their own noses. The truth of the matter is I am going to see my newest granddaughter for the first time. Yes, of course we will see the rest of the family on the way but for me the first visit to Elizabeth is very important. Grandma has been able to go twice and this will be her third visit; however for the children and I this is our first opportunity. We expect to cover 8000+ miles in roughly 21 days, see some history and pleasure sites, visit family, and take care of business. So if you are between me and Massachusetts, on to Florida, and back again to Phoenix you are welcome to put in your bid for a special visit. One man in Nebraska has the right attitude; he has promised to make it worth my while; whatever that means; cash please. Oklahoma, Nebraska, Iowa, Chicago, Indiana, Ohio, Niagara Falls, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, Florida, Louisiana, And Texas have been Mapped for visits. Wow! This looks like great courage loading up computers, cell phones, children and a dog in the Motor-home to set off on this great adventure. Anyway if you feel neglected because I do not answer on the first ring or two try leaving a message; we will take messages at least once a day. Or better yet use the cell phones for the October trip. I will have the hands free setup on my phone and Donna will be able to help with most of your needs. 602 819 7103 is my number and 602 819 7132 is Donna. We will not be carrying a whole lot of paper but the information that is on memory will be with us. We are also set up on e-fax for this trip. If it works good enough we will drop the third phone line in November. I am not yet sure who will be house-sitting so getting your faxes to me will require following instructions. E-fax # is 305 768 6275. Yes I will have it figured out how to properly use it before we travel. GOOD NEWS IS ALWAYS IMPORTANT Joe and Eileen have returned from a very good and productive visit to DC. I have asked her to write up the visit for publication here. If timing is right you will get it in this issue; if not you will get her report at the next printing. You may also get the news in person at the November 20, 1999 Meeting IN PHOENIX. My two cents goes right along with what I told you about all the rest of the bureaucrats who work for us. They really do not know the truth or law; and have no time to learn without our diligent effort to teach. Your government training programs on the facts of law is really inadequate to the serving of the just needs of the governed. Please consider this simple fact; you have a hard time keeping up with one case; I have expressed my admiration for John keeping up with a hundred plus cases; explained some of my difficulties with 25+ active cases. And you expect your elected congressional representative to be current on 500,000 cases so he can give you special attention at the drop of your hat. Wake up it is your responsibility. It is entirely good news that the Congress is interested in doing the best job possible. It is good news that they actually want to listen to good, well documented cases of abuse they have the opportunity to see or hear. It is good news that they know the difference between just garbage and good cases. All your hired representatives deserve your best effort to teach and inform. You must represent you in the best light possible to your elected and hired servants of government to expect just treatment. It is good news that Senator Orin Hatch is threatening to cut off the Justice Department budget over the Waco and Clemency case stonewalling of Congressional Subpoenas. The trend continues towards Congress figuring out its legitimate constitutional authority and the strict limits imposed by we the people on the government created to serve our just needs. They really are getting the point; keep up the good work, and effectual fervent prayers all ye righteous men. WE WIN AGAIN! PRAISE GOD!!! ON WITH THE SHOW In re writing and review the 1203 information I have come to the conclusion that we have an even bigger job. AND WE HAVE A GREATER OPPORTUNITY BEFORE US. We have the opportunity to do a massive education on our bureaucrats about the value of the "oath of office". This is where I really appreciate Joe Banister; it was his "oath of office" that resulted in his joining the right side of the debate and the spiritual warfare. We have the opportunity to teach the constitution to our low level employees at the IRS and the Department of Treasury, perhaps Joe was not the only one with a conscience. It is entirely necessary that we be truthful in all our oaths to set the example for all our employees and representatives of the value of truth. There is no need to exaggerate; and emotional outbursts of childish temper tantrums and vain ravings waste the LIMITED resource of time, accomplish nothing, and DAMAGE THE EFFORTS OF OTHERS WHO CHOOSE TO DO THE PROPER JOB OF TEACHING. Be responsible or be quiet. Allow truth to be heard in a proper presentation. I have been greatly blessed by my acquaintance with our local TIGTA 1203 officer. He has gone to the extreme to give us fair treatment. I have a great respect for his office and person. If you are going to correspond be sure you are respectful, courteous, factual, concise, and reasonable. I remind you he was sent to us because an agent found my promises of legal action to be threatening; and that was before we had a clue of the value of 1203. They sent me the cure to their tyranny and we are using it properly. Now! Let us examine the specific Error issue for "FALSE STATEMENT UNDER OATH"; Each and every employee of the Alphabet Soup Organizations and agencies are under an oath of office. What does this mean to you? Quite simply it opens up agents of BLM, ATF, DEA, FAA, FDA, and all the others to action for violation of your constitutionally protected and civil rights on the basis of lying under oath (also called perjury). But for now let us concentrate on the IRS agents who knowingly and willfully lie under oath. The GAO, other agents, citizens and congressmen say so. It is of course true that this 1203 provision is Congress attempt at damage control. By giving us the lollipop of administrative action they hope we will not file the civil suits; however, it is my hope and belief that the administrative process is merely preparatory to those suits when we do it right. Remember we must exhaust the administrative remedies to overcome the self serving "sovereign immunity" and "official immunity". You have the Constitutionally Protected God given Right to a government agent and agency that acts solely and expressly within the strict confines of law. Every exception is a civil rights violation because it is the civil law that carries out your rights in a civil society against civil service employees of your government. Yes, I am aware the civil law sets limits to your civil ability for civil damage; or does it?.? Let us look again at Article 1; Section 8; Clause 14 for the Constitutional language; "Rules for the government". This is the limited delegation of authority granted to congress and the federal government. It does not say rules for the people or how to rule the people, citizens, or subjects. The "RULES" that limit your ability to sue have to come only from that provision. I can find no other provision in my citizens handbook for the administration of the will of the people or the just needs of the governed. Do You have a just need to be limited in seeking justice, due process, and peaceful redress against government? I certainly do not agree that there is ever a need to limit truth, justice, or peaceful redress of grievance against government. I do agree that there is a need to limit civil awards. The rest of the innocent people do not deserve to be taxed to make a few claimants richer than is justified. I like the administrative process under 1203 because it goes directly toward punishing the guilty bureaucrat without costing the innocent taxpayers excess expenses. I like the opportunity to assist in creating the 1203 officers job so that that one just need can be served. I am blessed to know that the Congress has an ear to hear; and that the IRS is very afraid of what we and Congress will do next. For those unaware we have been given rumors that agents expect further cuts and actions against their agency; some, as the commissioner has expressed, believe they will not survive this next round as Federal agents and employees. Praise GOD! It is wonderful news that agents are afraid of violating your rights or the laws they do not know; even to the point of being afraid to exercise collection activities. HALLELUJAH! Let me also remind you that you have a right to a 1203 TIGTA officer who will accept and process every legitimate documented complaint against IRS agents. Whenever the local office fails to do the job forward it to TIGTA, United States of America Department of Treasury, Washington, D. C. 202__(any place in the 202s and it will get there. When this forwarding takes place ask for the forms needed to file an additional official complaint against the derelict 1203 officer in your district. You may also choose to copy the oversight committees in house and senate. It is my belief that an additional mailing is now needed. A copy of every complaint needs to go to the GAO auditors with a suggestion that they review how the complaints are being handled by Treasury. How many are being swept under the rug? How frequently does the Commissioner mitigate the penalty? What is the due process to insure that agents and employees are punished for their error issues under 1203? A SPECIAL NOTICE I intend to include here several items that have come to me over the Internet. I remind you that it is your responsibility to check it out and not go off half cocked. It will damage all our efforts if we start sending in frivolous complaints without merit and documentation. Please do not waste the finite resource of time for my employee servants in government. FROM http://due process.org/newsletter This is a free newsletter over the internet and they can be hired to do certain other services. One of the services I do not need but have observed is the W-4 termination process. Go look at the web page and see if you like it too. Weakest Link is Biggest Problem . The most important element to establishing any tax liability is the creation of an assessment. The assessment record contains necessary information about the liability, such as identifying the taxpayer, the taxable activity or item, the time period in which the liability is incurred, the law imposing the obligation to pay and so forth. The biggest problem with the federal income tax system, with regard to individuals, is that the IRS never makes any assessment. This is the weakest link in the complete income tax system. The problem we face when attempting to expose this is that the federal courts will not take jurisdiction in any claim for refund unless you allege that a valid assessment was created. We have the congress to thank for this. In other judicial proceedings, the IRS is permitted to produce a certificate of assessment (Form 4340). Case law supports this as well. The courts allow this as a valid assessment. [i.c. notes that we need to have done a better job in administrative before going to court; and there are now beginning to be cases where the court does not accept the 4340. All a part of progress in education and training.] Absent a careful analysis of the Internal Revenue Manual, most believe that the Substitute for Return (or SFR assessment) process gives rise to an assessment. This however is merely a bluff. The SFR is a blank 1040 upon which the agent records the name and address of the "taxpayer". No other data is included on the form and no documents are certified nor signed under penalty of perjury. My question is why cant the IRS write a regulation and procedure to create assessments? I think the answer is because then the Federal government would need the authority to impose and collect a tax from private citizens living in the USA [from JC within the several states and without the United States as defined in 26 USC]. Obviously, this authority does not exist. If an individual owes a tax, why would it be required to sign any documents under penalty of perjury? Nonetheless, while this remains the weakest link within the federal and state dependent income tax system, it stands as our biggest problem. We have yet to obtain this admission on the record of any forum, or to find it as a controlling factor in any judicial or administrative decision. [Note; we have however seen bureaucrats run for shelter when the issue is properly raised.] AND THIS ONE FROM THE SAME SOURCE; THE WORST ENEMY .. Lets cheer the IRS when we talk about our enhanced ability to stop levies, not to mention the audit and examination process itself, thanks to new legislation. However, we must deprecate the lack of similar legislation that might allow a poor California citizen to at least have a chance to a fair fight against the Franchise Tax Board. There seems to be a lack of administrative procedures that would allow a Californian the opportunity to create a dispute about an alleged tax liability, and have any meaningful chance at prevailing on the merits. There are alternative solutions. One can make himself attachment proof through the use of trust systems, amending signature cards at his bank, attempting re-negotiation of labor agreements with "employee" leasing companies, or, as a last resort, making the company for which they work responsible for cooperating with the state. These methods are discussed throughout the newsletter series and within the Due Process Discussion Forum. HUMOR HELPS US ALL; if we really take this stuff to seriously it is sickening. Dear sirs: I am responding to your letter denying the deductions for two of the three dependents I claimed on my 1998 Federal Tax Return. THANK YOU. I have questioned whether these are my children or not for years. They are evil and expensive. Its only fair that since they are minors and not my responsibility that the government (who is evidently taxing me more to care for these waifs) knows something about them and what to expect over the next year. You may apply next year to reassign them to me and reinstate the deduction. THIS YEAR THEY ARE YOURS! The oldest, Kristen, is now 17. She is brilliant. Ask her. I suggest you put her to work in your office where she can answer peoples questions about their returns. While she has no formal training, it has not seemed to hinder her knowledge of any other subject you can name. Taxes should be a breeze. Next year she is going to college. I think it is wonderful that you will now be responsible for that little expense. While you mull that over keep in mind that she has a truck. It doesnt run at the moment so you have the immediate decision of appropriating some Department of Defense funds to fix the vehicle or getting up early to drive her to school. Kristen also has a boyfriend. Oh joy. While she possesses all the wisdom of the universe, her alleged mother and I have felt it best to occasionally remind her of the virtues of abstinence, and in the face of overwhelming passion, safe sex. This is always uncomfortable and I am quite relieved you will be handling this in the future. May I suggest you reinstate Joycelyn Elders, who had a rather good handle on the problem. Patrick is 14, Ive had my suspicions about this one. His eyes are a little close together for normal people. He may be a tax examiner himself one day if you do not incarcerate him first. In February I was awakened at three in the morning by a police officer who was bringing Pat home. He and his friends were tping houses. In the future would you like him delivered to the local IRS office or to Ogden? Kids at 14 will do almost anything on a dare. His hair is purple. Permanent dye, temporary dye, what is the big deal? Learn to deal with it. Youll have plenty of time as he is sitting out a few days from school for instigating a food fight. Ill take care of filing your phone number with the vice principal. Oh yes, he and all his friends have raging hormones. This is the house of testosterone and it will be much more peaceful when he is living in your home. DO NOT leave any of them unsupervised with girls, explosives, inflammables, inflatables, vehicles, or telephones. (Im sure you will find telephones a source of unimaginable amusement, and be sure to lock out the 900 and 976 numbers.) Heather is an alien. She slid through a time warp and appeared quite by magic one year. Im sure this one is yours. She is 10 going on 21. She came from a bad trip in the sixties. She wears tie-dyed clothes, beads, sandals, and hair that looks like Tiny Tims. Fortunately you will be raising my taxes to offset the pinch of her remedial reading courses. Hooked on Phonics is expensive so the school dropped it. Good news! You can buy it yourself for half of the deduction you are denying. Its quite obvious that we were terrible parents (ask the other two) so they have helped raise this one to a new level of terror. She cannot speak English. Most people under twenty understand the curious patois she fashioned out of valley girls/boys in the hood/reggae/yuppie/ political doublespeak. I dont. The school sends her to a speech pathologist who has her roll her rs. It added a refreshing Mexican/Irish touch to her voice. She wears hats backwards, pants baggy and wants one of her ears pierced four more times. There is a fascination with tattoos that worries me but I am sure that you can handle it. Bring a truck when you come to get her, as she sort of nests in her room and I think that it would be easier to move the entire thing than find out what it is really made of. You denied two of the three exemptions so it is only fair you get to pick which two you will take. I prefer that you take the youngest, I will still go bankrupt with Kristens college but then I am free. If you take the two oldest then I still have time for counseling before Heather becomes a teenager. If you take the two girls then I will not feel so bad about putting Patrick in a military academy. Please let me know your decision as soon as possible as I have already increased the withholding on my W-4 to cover the $395 in additional tax and to make a down payment on an airplane. Yours truly ------ There are wonderful educational items on the internet; and I advocate all who can afford it and most can to get enough computer to suit your activities and internet research and communications. I save several times the cost of the service on my long distance phone bill and it is easy to make a hard copy of the conversation if needed. Access1 is a 9.95 a month server nationwide if you pay by the year. I have learned how to do a lot of things on this little machine. I often surprise myself, and it is much easier to get messages then to stop getting them. I do not shop on the Internet except for rare occasions. Three of my friends forward me an average of 15 messages a day to keep me current on all types of events. As time goes by I will be giving you other sites and references to sources that appeal to me. ------ |
Books and Such I am currently reviewing a book by BRUTUS called Duct Tape or Nails. In the first hundred pages he first upset me then verified how thoroughly I knew he had researched the issue. I am acquainted with Brutus and call him Friend. We are not in perfect harmony; in particular about pledges of allegiance. I suspect that his and my research on that subject differ greatly; however that disagreement has little or nothing to do with the quality of the research. In fact those early chapters are not nearly as well written as the research and documentation on the main points about the IRS mistakes, theirs and ours. While the first hundred pages give me only a partial view of the issues I can say that it appears to be well worth the 19.95 M.S.R.P. 1 800 288 1941 to order. I am a rather slow reader (intentionally) in this kind of legal research and material and will likely not finish this book before this newsletter goes to press. It is my intention to send you this before our trip; otherwise I am wasting space to discuss that trip in this letter. Well a day later and 50 more pages I can say the documentation and dissertation on SS and 666 make the whole price worthwhile. I even like the attack on the lawyers. I am blessed by the fact that he has gone to religious freedom and how to exert yours. As in all works of man there is reason to study and pray as you apply the teaching; what is mandatory for Wallace, Brutus, and JC may not be so for all. It is possible to choose a less vigorous path though none of us will be very instructive on compromises; or on allegiance to the order of man (pledges of allegiance belong to one master only, Jesus Christ our living reigning King). When you order your copies use my name and see if it will get you anything other than laughed at; I will tell Brutus to watch out for you. I cant even believe this I have finished the book. While there are a couple of points I see very differently it is very well researched and written. Some of you will have seen a lot of it before; but never compiled and documented this thoroughly. Most have never seen anything to compare with this coordinated writing on religion and law. SPEND THE MONEY TO GET MORE THAN ONE COPY YOU WILL HAVE SOMEONE YOU NEED TO GIVE IT TO; and I can guarantee if you loan it out will not return. I think I will even be so bold as to send one to Joe Banister, and our 1203 officer.
------- The colonists had a good idea is another internet article I liked this week. It is on the subject of how the colonists were smart enough to prohibit the rampant acts of lawyers. Some made the practice of law a felony with severe punishments. All the colonies had the good sense to kick the barristers out as they did with anti-christian religious practices. Judaism was a capitol offense in New Amsterdam as it was at one time in France and other places. But lets stick to the lawyers; some discussion has recently occurred about prohibiting lawyers from lawmaking to their own benefit. Sadly I suspect we are in a condition never before seen in the annals of man. Like the IRS the Bar is so messed up I doubt it can be fixed to serve any useful purpose or serve a just need of the governed. As we become better "smatterers in law" as Edmond Burke described the colonists in 1774 perhaps we will cease from our laziness and slothfulness to again take control of our hireling government. I choose not to let that hireling to entangle me in unlawful anti-Christ schemes and servitude to the love of money of the "merchants of babylon the great" through false advertising and black robed whores and merchants of confusion (babble). SECRET HISTORY of IRS COPS; by Timothy W. Maier; source Rhawks@aol.com Insight has obtained a copy of the Internal Revenue Services top-secret, authorized history that reveals the agencys mistakes, investigations and (sometimes) arrogance. From "Scarface" Al Capone to the "Dapper Don" John Gotti, IRS agents got their man. Despite the criticism the agency has suffered which prompted sensational hearings on Capitol hill last year the IRS has a strong record of obtaining convictions, even against its own employees. .So says the agencys secret internal file, titled 75 Years of Criminal Investigation History 1919-1999. This 202-page report never before seen outside the agency and obtained by Insight under the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA was not meant for publication. Not even Senate Finance Committee Chairman William Roth of Delaware has seen it; his investigators have asked for a look at Insights copy. .. Caution the cover of the report reads. "This document is for confidential use of authorized Internal Revenue Service officials only and not for publication. .. When Insight asked how much it cost to produce this file, IRS official Marsh Proctor snaps, "FOIA it!" Perhaps such secrecy concerning the report reflects an IRS desire to limit access to its internal investigations. It did a lot to police itself in its early years and continues to do so today. Some of the IRS allegations against its criminal investigators are strikingly similar to what the public heard last year during Senate Finance Committee hearings on IRS abuses. NOTE ; this excerpt goes on for three more pages not reproduced here. www.insightmag.com may be a source you want to look at occasionally.
------ Time Magazine September 13, 1999 had an elaborate story on Europeans Protesting and boycotting such favorite outlets as McDonalds for the use of genetically engineered foods. The article is well written and points to health consequences including mental problems from the use of genetically altered and manipulated food stocks. This is apparently one reason the American farmer is having trouble in the world market and places like Canada that do far less engineering of the genetics of grains and animals is doing much better. The story even discloses Secretary of Agriculture instructing grain elevators to segregate the engineered from the natural or organic as we call it. On my last trip to Florida I brought back an article from the Tampa Tribune on Canadian Scientists who had genetically engineered hogs so that their waste would not be so terribly toxic to the earth. So much for the argument that feeding an unclean swine better food somehow changes it from unclean. Hogs are genetically engineered with Rats and other unclean rodents to aid in a better development of the digestive system to aid in the limitations of toxic waste and sterilization of the earth. IT SEEMS GOD WAS RIGHT AGAIN; SWINE FLESH IS UNCLEAN FOR FOOD and not to be eaten by those who are following after GOD and his laws. This is not a mere suggestion but is rather a self executing statute. I saw an AMA article a few years ago that traced directly some 17 human maladies to the consumption of pig flesh and its inherent toxins and parasites. BUT IT IS MORE PROFITABLE THAN CLEAN BEASTS SUCH AS CATTLE; DUH! IT IS STILL WRONG. Bob sent me a 9 page article over the internet that is an excerpt of a lengthy well documented research paper on genetically engineered food particularly emphasizing the lack of food value. HERE IS THE QUESTION YOU MUST ASK .. If you actually followed good BIBLICAL dietary laws and rest laws could you be a better soldier in this current spiritual warfare? There is nothing extreme or hard about following dietary laws; most of it even tastes good. And with the current publicity the availability of better quality is coming fast to a market near you. It is also true that if we eat better quality clean foods we will need less herbs and supplements for medicating our ailments caused by the poor diet. I am not a vegetarian but do like and enjoy vegetables; prefer all meats well done as God stipulates. If it is a scavenger or a toxic waste filter do not eat it. Rats and rodents of all kinds are to be avoided. Water filters such as squid, oysters, shrimp, lobsters, clams and crabs are scavengers to clean up the toxic waste as are hogs and hawks. The rules are simple fins plus scales from the sea. Cloven hoof that chews the cud in 4 footed animals. Flying birds that are not scavengers of carrion. Fruits that contain seeds, and green herbs that bear the seed. Look it up for yourself and start getting Gods help in health. "Praying amiss" is akin to praying for healing and health when you refuse to follow the simple dietary laws given by the design engineer that created mankind. That is a little like screaming at ford when you had no oil in the engine and it broke; or yelling because the car ran out of gas the first week you had it without ever visiting a gas pump. So if your prayers for health seem to be falling on deaf ears try doing it Gods way in diet, rest, work, fasting, prayer, commandments, and laws. What the hell it doesnt even cost a lot extra to do the right thing. What was it he said about the little things and the big things? Oh, yeah; take care of the little things and the big ones will follow suit. If we can not, or rather refuse to, take care of such a simple thing as our own diet and health; how can we expect God to trust us with a community or a Nation under GOD? Yes; I know we are lazier about our food than Israel was in the wilderness; and we will whine at every penny extra it costs to do it right out of our love of money selfish pockets. DO IT ANYWAY! GOD IS NOT MOCKED BY OUR FOLLY. It is our problem and our responsibility. I do not need to hear your self serving alibis or your grace inspired false rapture doctrines that God somehow cleaned the swine and the shrimp. Show me the scripture. And if God did not cleanse it in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ it is unclean today just as it was for Abraham and Moses. If you choose to argue "what God has cleansed let no man call unclean" then cannibalism is for you; mankind (specifically Adamkind and Israel) was cleansed by God of the sin and the death sentence price for that sin was paid; not even the flesh of that special man Jesus was cleansed for food which was unclean in the origin. Israel has a covenant command of an irrevocable contract to keep these laws in all the generations; and those who are not descendants of the tribes of Israel who choose to align themselves with almighty God claiming Jesus as their saviour and follow his law have the whole law, including foods. Grace is only Gods way of treating us like children and giving us the time we need to come around to doing the right things with our life and body. It does not remove one jot or tittle of the law until all things are accomplished and I do not see the manifestation of the New Jerusalem at the moment; all evil is not banished to its home in the pit; and all do not know the truth that Jesus is God Almighty.
------ I have also been privileged this month to two very well written essays that agree very closely with me on the perils of serving two masters and allegiance or servitude to other gods and demagogues like the federal government, bankers in usury schemes, false doctrines in 501 {c}(3) corporate religious governmental entities. Jesus is the one who said it was wrong and impossible to serve two masters. Jehovah, Yehovah, or YHVH said thou shalt have no other gods in my presence and since he is omnipresent that about covers the earth and all that in it is. Brutus is in agreement also.
------ Presumed Correct is again from Rhawks@aol.com The IRS is generally provided the judicially created "presumption of correctness". In this presumption the agencies determination is presumed correct, without support. This presumption of correctness can be refuted by a preponderance of the evidence to the contrary. I realize the burden of proof has been somewhat shifted by the following, but on close examination you will see it is not what it was declared to be it has exceptions and limitations. The text of RRA 98 creating new section 7491 to IRC is then added followed by: Over the months I have reported many GAO Reports regarding the IRS trying to stress their importance. I have downloaded and read these reports, well over three inches of paper{me too}. The GAO (1990-1999) is/was concerned about getting tax revenues alleged by the IRS. Over the course of these years the GAO about the IRS accounting ( or lack of), non-filers/taxprotestors and IRS records and accountabilities. GAO testimony before congress, not discounting recent (1998) hearings on the IRS, and GAO Reports on the IRS only emphasize that the following raises serious question of the creditability and correctness of the IRSs claims. What the GAO asks about the IRS and their procedures together with what we know about that agency and its procedures PAINT AN INCREDIBLE PICTURE OF FRAUD. I contend the following GAO Reports create a preponderance of the evidence that the IRS can not be afforded any presumption of correctness {excerpts only} GAO/HR-93-13, December 1992 In 1990, the IRS was declared to be one of these "HIGH RISK" AGENCIES. A "high risk agency" is one considered by the GAO especially vulnerable to waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement. {sounds just like the IRS we all know and love}. " the IRS admitted that nearly 75% of the amounts can not be collected because either the records are inaccurate and the taxpayers do not actually owe the money . First the agencys records are inaccurate and insufficient.. Because IRS does not know how many accounts are valid, its estimates of receivables are unreliable as a measure of performance. Because IRS does not know which accounts are valid, . IRS collection efforts have long been hampered by erroneous and insufficient information. To begin with, IRS accounts are riddled with errors and duplications; many of the recorded debts do not even exist, Moreover, IRS does not collect some information that could help it better guide its efforts. These problems mean that the IRS does not know how many accounts are valid [JC Note; this also means of course that 75% or more of collection activity should be subject to overzealous collection activity suits and damage claims.] All subsequent GAO Reports are more of the same This report goes on for eight pages DOES THE IRS LIE? THE GAO REPORTS YES, AT LEAST A MAJORITY OF THE TIME How does the IRS create false claims? The GAO Reports say the agents routinely falsify information in taxpayer files erroneous errors from non existant telephone conversations and examination meetings also contribute to the making up out of thin air these false and fraudulent claims of receivables by the SERVICE. {And every one is a false statement under oath for a 1203 complaint} For the tax year 1993, IRS identified 59.6 million potential individual nonfilers, no enforcement action on 54.1 million because it was subsequently determined there was no filing requirement. There are many other GAO Reports that continue to raise serious questions as to the validity of IRS claims.
------ See I am telling you this internet thing is a wonderful tool to find the truth; you just have to have a good filter to extract the truth out of the paranoia and hyper enthusiasm of some of the researchers. I even got a bit of useful information from Behold this week. Surprise! Surprise! This may be the source of the undoing of the federal bureaucratic invasion of your privacy and I am not even into the encryption area yet. The sheer volume and number of us out here in the great unwashed is overwhelming the tiny fraction of them inside the belt-way and the bureaucracies. 59.6 million to 100,000 is real good odds in warfare be it civil in the courts or spiritual in the greater courts of right and wrong.
-------- We need another good joke. Well a good story will have to do, fresh tonight off the Internet About ten years ago a young and very successful executive named Josh was traveling down a Chicago neighborhood street. He was going a bit too fast in his sleek, black 12 cylinder Jaguar XKE, which was only two months old. He was watching for kids darting out between parked cars and slowed down when he thought he saw something. As his car passed no child darted out , but a brick sailed out and -WHUMP! -- it slammed into the Jags shiny black side door! SCREECH !! Brakes slammed! Gears ground into reverse and tires madly spun the Jaguar back to the spot where the brick had been thrown. Josh jumped out of the car, grabbed the kid and pushed him up against a parked car. What was all that about and who are you? Just what the heck are you doing? Building up a head of steam he went on; Thats my new car, that brick you threw is going to cost you a lot of money. Why did you throw it?
"Please, mister, Please . Im sorry! I didnt know what else to do!" Pleaded the youngster. " I threw the brick because no one else would stop!" Tears were dripping down the boys chin as he pointed around the parked car. "Its my brother, mister," he said. " he rolled off the curb and fell out of his wheelchair and I cant lift him." Sobbing, the boy asked the executive, "would you help me get him back in the wheelchair? Hes hurt and hes too heavy for me."
Moved beyond words, the young executive tried desperately to swallow the rapidly swelling lump in his throat. Straining he lifted the young man back into the wheelchair and took out his handkerchief and wiped the scrapes and cuts, checking to be sure everything was going to be okay. He then watched the younger brother push him down the sidewalk toward their home.
It was a long walk back to the sleek, black, shiny, 12 cylinder Jaguar XKE - a long and slow walk.
Josh never did fix the side door of his Jaguar. He kept the dent to remind himself not to go through life so fast that someone has to throw a brick at him to get his attention Some bricks are softer than others. Feel for the brick of life coming at you. For all the Negative things we have to say God has positive answers: You may say it is impossible. God says: "all things are possible" (Luke 18:27) When you say "Im too tired". God Says "I will give you rest". (Matthew 11: 28-30) When you say "Nobody really loves me"; God says "I love you". (John 13:34) You say; "I cant go on": yet God says, "My grace is sufficient"; (II Corinthians 12:9; Psalms 91:15)"I cant figure things out" brings God to say, "I will direct your steps" (Proverbs 3:5-6). When you say "I can not do it" HE replies "You can do all things" (Philippians 4:13). "Im not able" brings "I am able". (II Corinthians 9:8) To "Its not worth it" he responds; "It will be worth it" (Romans 8:28). When you say, "I cant forgive myself" GOD declares, "I FORGIVE YOU" (I John 1:9 & Romans 8:1); "I can not manage" brings "I will supply all your needs" (Philippians 4:19): "Im afraid" brings the response of God; "I have not given you a spirit of fear"(II Timothy 1:7). You say "I am always worried and frustrated" and God says, "cast all of your cares on me"(I Peter 5:7); "I dont have enough faith" brings, "I have given everyone a measure of faith"(Romans 12:3). How about "I am not smart enough" being answered by God; "I give you wisdom"(I Cor. 1:30). You say "I feel all alone" but God says "I will never leave you or forsake you"(Heb 13:5). email info@covenantkeepers.com |
|
We Now Have A Web site, check us out at: http://www.covenantkeepers.com
Thank you for your support and encouragement.
Now it is even easier to share with your friends and family.
See you on the Web. You may also drop a line and let us know what you think.
E-Mail Us at: info@covenantkeepers.com
If You would like to read the Govt. Cites for Yourself You can do so by going HERE!!
If Your still Not convinced, Go HERE !