[^^HOME]  [The Paris Project]  [The Plato Project]

The Aesthetics

See also: [Art Critques] This series of essays is on the subject of the aesthetic life and what it means to be an artist -- a celebration of the aesthetic spirit in all possible universes. On this page: {www links}

Universe(s)

Anyone interested enough to read about physics is certain aware of the concept of multiple realities, multiple universes, and multiple dimensions. Whether (ultimately) these turn out to be *provable* (to the left-brained nit wits and Vogons [Note 1] who seem to be running the current planet (Earth; see map). Consider the following: a) At least one universe exists (the current one we live in, or as Uncle Al [2] would put it: "The Universe of Discourse". b) If something has happened at least once, it could/might/should/should-not happen again. An excellent book on this is by Martin Rees "Just Six Numbers" in which he discusses how there are just six numbers that control the structure of our universe; eg, the gravitational constant (G), Plank's Constant (h), etc. Thus, of the "many universes that are possible, only a few are stable and can actually exist" (not an exact quote).

Notes

(this section only) [1] Vogons are a character that Douglas Noel Adams (DNA) created for his celebrated trilogy, the 5-volume work generally known as "The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy". In brief (from the H2G2): Vogons are one of the most unpleasant, ugly, artistically incompetent and nauseatingly priggish races in the universe. They aren’t actually evil as such, but if you ever wanted to get a lift from one, for instance, FORGET IT! They are also apparently bad tempered, bureaucratic, officious and callous - "they wouldn’t even lift a finger to save their own grandmothers from the ravenous bugblatter beast of Traal without orders signed in triplicate, sent in, sent back, queried, lost, found, subjected to public enquiry, and finally buried in soft peat for three months and recycled as firelighters." For more info visit: [Sad Geezer site] or: [BBC official site] Frank adds this: Notice that the *value* judgement of the BBC uses the term "ugly", which is clearly predjudicial. I personally find their physical form quite eloqently intriguing. That is, to completely represent what happens to a culture that deprives itself of all that is noble in its (or any) species; eg, thinking, literature, art, music, poetry, history, philosophy, and of course "leisure drug usage". (Note that this site does *not* promote the use of drugs, since as we all know the only way to deal with the world is to just deal with it. And if you *do* need help, there are any number of health giving physicians (well respected in the community and properly registered with nationally recognised agencies and organisations) that *prescribe* for you any number of medically approved (and industrially produced) medications to help you to cope with the world around you. That said prescriptions might erase not only your perceptions/apprehension with the world around you and completely alter (if not erase) most of the unique aspects of your own personally is to *not* be questioned. They are experts and they will decide what is best for you. (this has been a public announcement) {Back to the TEXT} {Back to the TEXT} [2] Uncle Al is the familiar term used by many of the thinkers on Earth (see map) when refering to one "Albert Einstein". Two notable quotes come to mind: "If i had known that my work would have lead to the death of people, i would never have studied physics, and would have instead become a gardner and studied the violin more assidiously". "It is not enough for you to understand...." *** NEED QUOTE FROM THE MAC-2001!!! {Back to the TEXT} [3] {Back to the TEXT} [4] {Back to the TEXT} [5] {Back to the TEXT} [6] {Back to the TEXT} [7] {Back to the TEXT} [8] {Back to the TEXT} [9] {Back to the TEXT} [10] { [11] {Back to the TEXT} [12] {Back to the TEXT} [13] {Back to the TEXT} [14] {Back to the TEXT} [15] {Back to the TEXT} [16] {Back to the TEXT} [17] {Back to the TEXT} [18] {Back to the TEXT} [19] {Back to the TEXT} [20] { [21] {Back to the TEXT} [22] {Back to the TEXT} [23] {Back to the TEXT} [24] {Back to the TEXT} [25] {Back to the TEXT} [26] {Back to the TEXT} [27] {Back to the TEXT} [28] {Back to the TEXT} [29] {Back to the TEXT} [30] { [31] {Back to the TEXT} [32] {Back to the TEXT} [33] {Back to the TEXT} [34] {Back to the TEXT} [35] {Back to the TEXT} [36] {Back to the TEXT} [37] {Back to the TEXT} [38] {Back to the TEXT} [39] {Back to the TEXT} [40] { [41] {Back to the TEXT} [42] {Back to the TEXT} [43] {Back to the TEXT} [44] {Back to the TEXT} [45] {Back to the TEXT} [46] {Back to the TEXT} [47] {Back to the TEXT} [48] {Back to the TEXT} [49] {Back to the TEXT} [50] { [51] {Back to the TEXT} [52] {Back to the TEXT} [53] {Back to the TEXT} [54] {Back to the TEXT} [55] {Back to the TEXT} [56] {Back to the TEXT} [57] {Back to the TEXT} [58] {Back to the TEXT} [59] {Back to the TEXT}

www Links

[
phrase generator!] 12342 yielded: With regard to the issue of content, the disjunctive perturbation of the spatial relationships brings within the realm of discourse the eloquence of these pieces.