Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Intellectual property of: T M Malo, Madoc Owen np,

Copyright 2002 T M Malo Forest, Ohio 45843, All rights reserved

E-mail: parallel52@lycos.com

Translating Quantum Communication                              Defining An Existential Baseline                              A New Human Destiny

Document 111

January 1, 2002

 

Translating Quantum Communication

 

The essential problem with the theoretical supposition of communication at the quantum level is not proving that such communication exists, but rather, learning to speak the sub-particulate language of the universe. Observing quantum phenomenon from an unproved existential baseline is very much like Peter Pan trying to catch his shadow. To learn the language of communication at the quantum level physics must finally face its ultimate responsibility – a defined proven existential baseline for the observer. Observing quantum phenomenon from an unproved existential baseline hoping to decipher the language is nothing more than a phantasmagoric attempt at time travel. There is far too much science fiction and fantasy in modern physics. The present course of the observer of quantum phenomenon is to go back in time to an unremembered past life where the observer and the observed all speak a language that the observer feels like he or she should comprehend but can’t seem to remember. Predictably controlling quantum phenomenon for useful purposes requires mastery of the language. Deciphering and mastering the language requires comprehending the relative perception point of the dilettante observer. To define a relative perception point the observer must have a proven existential baseline.

 

1) The nascence of the necessity of communication requires only two fundamental essences – absolute nothing and distance. The anomaly of absolute nothing is always the best genesis. Absolute nothing is absolutely alone, and therefore only and all. Distance is an existential rift in absolute nothing. Because absolute nothing is only it cannot have self-generated an existential rift. The nature of the rift can only be alien other absolute nothing because nothing else could cause an existential rift in absolute nothing: another absolute nothing so completely alien from the first that it can only be perceived by the first as an existential rift, or distance from itself. The presence of existential distance in absolute nothing is the nascence of the necessity for communication and the beginning of the inner existential communication of self-realization, or self-awareness.

 

2) Because the nature of absolute nothing is only and all, infinity and eternity, the genesis of consciousness can only be an existential enfolding process. In this structural nature of enfolding absolute nothing is able to be only, and yet be existentially separated from itself forever without any change to its fundamental characteristics or the existential distance within it. Absolute nothing may not circumnavigate its existential distance because that distance caused by the presence of alien other absolute nothing is as infinite and eternal as its fundamental nature. The enfolding of absolute nothing and alien other absolute nothing is the birth of consciousness. The volatile nature of absolute nothing (infinite and eternal) makes this genesis inevitable. Absolute nothing has the time to wait.

 

3) If absolute nothing (a ) is the existential rift of distance in absolute nothing (b ) and through the process of enfolding b becomes the existential rift of distance in a it is an anomaly, but an inevitable anomaly. There can only be an infinite number of absolute nothings because absolute nothing has an infinite amount of time for realization, and all of them must be completely alien one from the other because absolute nothing is infinitely only. The anomaly is inevitable. An enfolding of a around b is now the existential rift of distance in b , and an enfolding of b around a is now the existential rift of distance in a . This is the alcyon anomaly described by Madoc Owen in "The Blue Rose Project". Both a and b are necessarily self-aware. Within a is an existential rift of distance b and then itself and another existential rift of distance b and then itself again. This twice discovered self is cognizance or the capacity for reason and memory. Crossing a distance twice to the same destination proves the existence of the destination and the distance. True inner communication and the capacity to remember and define now exist within a and b . They are both now self-observing consciousnesses. They are now both aware of one another, but they can only be aware of one another as the respective existential rifts of distance within them. They each have the capacity for communication but cannot communicate with each other. They are still completely alien one from the other. They are both now facing a paradoxical volatility of nature for which there is no inner solution – "onlyness" and loneliness. What lies before them is an endless process of self-definition and self-realization in a quest to recognize what cannot be recognized – other.

 

4) Even if a and b become aware of one another and begin to define for themselves the suspected nature of other, they cannot communicate. Communication with other is the exchange of proven truth to be held in common by both participants. The essences of self-observing reasoning remembering consciousnesses a and b do not have an existential baseline in common to found communication with one another on. Initially the existential rift of distance in a was b . The initial existential rift of distance in b was a enfolding b . Consequently b cannot realize the same truth in the same way as a . They cannot talk to one another.

 

5) If a third absolute nothing (c ) becomes an existential rift of distance in both a and b , both a and b now have an existential baseline in common. They will now formulate truth, regardless of how alien their respective languages may be from one another, from a common perception of their respective natural beginnings. If a , b , and c , all three driven by the paradox of realization, embark upon a quest for self-realization and communication with other, c will most certainly collapse into futility before a and b . This is the realization of the passage of time for a and b . The change in the nature of c within both a and b is detectable to them both because they have both experienced it conversely. Proven truth may now be organized in a graduated reality directly converse to the progression toward futility. This is potentially proven eternal infinite being.

 

6) If a fourth absolute nothing (d ) becomes an existential rift of distance in a , b , and c , after the collapse into futility of c , then a , b , and c all have an existential baseline in common and the existential rift of distance d in common. Communication between the three is now possible. The relative developmental state of c to a and b is of no consequence since through communication a and b are well aware of the immaturity of c and through the communication of proven truth may quickly and easily restore c to their respective levels of maturity. It is inevitable that either a or b or both become again an existential rift of distance within c . All three become enfolded with d .

 

7) The observer of quantum phenomenon postulating a sub-particulate form of communication is d . The existential rift of distance within d that is the cause of consciousness and the ability to communicate is the communicating anomaly of a , b , and c . The place where the communication takes place is d . Though we number in the billions we are all d ’s. We would not be able to observe communication unless it was taking place within us. We would not be able to communicate with one another unless communication was taking place within us and we were able to observe it. We have taught one another to compare observations for proof because we can. We can only observe what we manifest out of ourselves for ourselves. If we are discovering truth in common we are all manifesting completely unique reflections of the same truth. None of us are the same. We are all completely alien to one another. If we are communicating common truths to one another it is because we all have an existential rift of distance within us in common, that contains the same enfolded group of three or more absolute nothings capable of communication with one another. There can be no other reason for our similarity and ability to communicate with one another.

 

8) If the d observer of quantum phenomenon postulating sub-particulate communication is able to observe, the d observer is crossing an existential rift of distance to observe a self-manifested reflection of the actively communicating (a b c ). The existential rift of distance between the d observer and the reflected (a b c ) cannot be only the (a b c ) anomaly. In such a case the d observer would be able to immediately realize and decipher the observation and continue its own evolution of consciousness based on the truth of (a b c ), because communication between (a b c ) already exists. Since absolute nothing cannot self-generate any new inner existential rift of distance the rift must be new alien absolute nothing (e ). Because the d observer can potentially observe the same phenomenon that all other d observers here can and communicate confirmation of the observation, d observer to d observer, the rift between the d observer and what it is observing must be the sum of the d observers. If every observer here is a d then there is a calculable relative magnitude for the existential rift of distance that every d crosses to observe communication. At any given point in time e is the population of the earth minus 1, or {pd - 1d = e }. This is not a Gordian knot. If the distance has a calculable relative magnitude to the d observer then either the distance e , or the d observer is not real. The relative perception point of the d observer must be wrong.

 

9) The d observer is infinite and eternal. The enfolded existential rift of distance e is infinite and eternal. Distance can only be there or not, on or off. The magnitude of e is not relative to d and the magnitude of d is not relative to e . The d observer of quantum phenomenon is not observing the primordial language of life. The d observer can only observe d . Communication on a quantum level is most likely the language of mimicry. It is the language that enables us to be aware of and communicate with all the other d observers around us. Every d observer contains an enfolded existential rift of distance that is (a b c ). The existential rift of distance between any d observer here, and what is being observed is: (if p is the population of the planet at any given point in time) (pd - 1d ) x (a b c ) + 1(a b c ) or more clearly, e = [(p – 1) x d + (a b c )] + 1(a b c ). Clearly e is relative to (a b c ) and not relative to the d observer. The anomaly (a b c ) sees the d observer clearly as other without the necessity of observing itself to reveal d . The d observer cannot see the anomaly (a b c ) as other. The d observer can only see a mirror image of the anomaly (a b c ) painted before it in its own d nature. Essentially this is because its ability to observe is limited to observing only existential enfolding. The d observer does not have the same existential baseline as the (a b c ) anomaly. Each and every other d that a d observer comes in contact with, is painted before the d observer in its own d nature to allow for communication between the two.

 

10) If there is one (a b c ) anomaly, it is inevitable that there are an infinite number of such anomalies given the nature of absolute nothing. It is also inevitable that there are an infinite number of d observers. The possibility of "alien" contact from outer space is a popular fantasy in science today. The truth is: your next-door neighbor is completely alien from you and a d observer the same as you. At our present level in the evolution of consciousness we can only consciously communicate with other d observers. Any other life form that we are able to see in a body and communicate with is a d observer just like us. We would not be able to communicate with them if this was not the case. If indeed they are d observers from a different (n o p ) anomaly, the fact that we can see and touch them, and communicate with them, only proves that baseline existential truth is all the same.

 

11) To the d observer, quantum communication can only be the way we manipulate our own d nature in order to provide a life form or body in our d universe of reality to communicate with. It is the language of replicative imagery revealed in us as existential enfolding. It is autonomic mimicry. It is essential to the on-going evolution of our consciousness that we decipher this fundamental form of communication. We must regain the ability to choose what we mimic. It is our destiny. Three d observers that have the ability to choose what they mimic may unite in a new anomaly and make a g , or seventh nature, that is quite simply living communication. To this g nature all alien other would be visible and able to be communicated with, and all alien other would be able to see and communicate with this g essence.