Hi, Jim,
Wow that's great I would love to see it. No I haven't heard of Frankie
Liles has he done alot of research on this line?
My husband and I just bought a 100 year old house in Franklin, Simpson
County Kentucky and are really looking forward to moving there and restoring
the home as well as being closer to the area to have a better chance to look
into the history more.
Thanks so much for all your help.
Barbara Ingram
12704 S. 33rd St.
Bellevue, NE 68123
----- Original Message -----
From: "JAMES TIMS" <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=jamestims75@hotmail.com&msg=MSG1046573501.36&start=944515&len=3783&src=&type=x>
To: <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=myzoo@cox.net&msg=MSG1046573501.36&start=944515&len=3783&src=&type=x>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Ingram History
> No Problem Cousin. Guess what I found today. I went through the box and
> found the info on your Samuel. I need your physical address to send all
this
> to you. Has around 15 pages to it. Better to snail mail it than scan it.
You
> ever here of a Frankie Liles. One of your line researchers. I was
wondering
> if your Samuel was from Thomas's line. Sure may be. Do some more lookin
into
> it. Get the info off to you soon as I get your address. My Address is P.
O.
> Box 265 Lockesburg, AR. 71846.......James!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Jim Ingram" <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=myzoo@cox.net&msg=MSG1046573501.36&start=944515&len=3783&src=&type=x>
> >To: "JAMES TIMS" <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=jamestims75@hotmail.com&msg=MSG1046573501.36&start=944515&len=3783&src=&type=x>
> >Subject: Ingram History
> >Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 08:43:39 -0600
> >
> >Hi Jim,
> >I have some of the information that you have listed but I want to compare
> >it with what I have because some of it doesn't make sense to me. For
> >instance they have Samuel and Ann marrying in 1760 this is impossible
> >because they had a son Jonathan, which is who we fall under, who was born
> >in 1756. Some researchs have tried to say that he was born in 1765 but
> >since he was in the revolutionary war he would not have been old enough
> >according to Mary Ruth Stulz. Anyway if what I have is correct I have
this
> >Samuel connecting to your line through Thomas Ingram as you fall under
> >Thomas's son John Sr. we fall under his son Charles who had a son John
who
> >married Hannah Pines. In John's will it does say he has a son named
Samuel
> >which from the will I presume he is his oldest son. I guess I do not
> >understand why people don't think this could be his son as it is the only
> >thing that I have come across that does make sense? Anyway if I find out
> >anything else I will let you know. Thanks so much for all the
inforamtion.
> >Barbara
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
