Hi Jim,
I have some of the information that you
have listed but I want to compare it with what I have because some
of it doesn't make sense to me. For instance they have Samuel
and Ann marrying in 1760 this is impossible because they had a son
Jonathan, which is who we fall under, who was born in 1756.
Some researchs have tried to say that he was born in 1765 but since
he was in the revolutionary war he would not have been old enough
according to Mary Ruth Stulz. Anyway if what I have is correct
I have this Samuel connecting to your line through Thomas Ingram as
you fall under Thomas's son John Sr. we fall under his son Charles
who had a son John who married Hannah Pines. In John's will it
does say he has a son named Samuel which from the will I presume he
is his oldest son. I guess I do not understand why people
don't think this could be his son as it is the only thing that I
have come across that does make sense? Anyway if I find out
anything else I will let you know. Thanks so much for all the
inforamtion.
Barbara
