Hi James,
I was just wonder what county in Arkansas you are from? I have been trying
to find information on a newer generation of Ingram's that settled in
Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas area. My husband's Great Grreat
Grandfather John Hankerson Ingram and his wife Virginia both died there
along with a couple of their children Lola Earle Ingram (who I'm told was
very wealthy but had married about 6 or 7 times but never had any children)
Rollo Jarrot he married Alma Clefena Gossage in Missouri but the both died
there in Arkansas. John Hankerson Ingram Jr. also settled in this area his
wife's name was Patricia Shackleford they were married in Lonoke, Lonoke
County, Arkansas but both died in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.
Does any of these name ring any bells? Just thought I would take a shot.
Let me know if you've heard of any of them. Thanks again for all your help.
Barbara
----- Original Message -----
From: "JAMES TIMS" <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=jamestims75@hotmail.com&msg=MSG1046586577.8&start=950955&len=4227&src=&type=x>
To: <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=myzoo@cox.net&msg=MSG1046586577.8&start=950955&len=4227&src=&type=x>
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Ingram History
> No Problem Cousin. Guess what I found today. I went through the box and
> found the info on your Samuel. I need your physical address to send all
this
> to you. Has around 15 pages to it. Better to snail mail it than scan it.
You
> ever here of a Frankie Liles. One of your line researchers. I was
wondering
> if your Samuel was from Thomas's line. Sure may be. Do some more lookin
into
> it. Get the info off to you soon as I get your address. My Address is P.
O.
> Box 265 Lockesburg, AR. 71846.......James!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Jim Ingram" <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=myzoo@cox.net&msg=MSG1046586577.8&start=950955&len=4227&src=&type=x>
> >To: "JAMES TIMS" <http://sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/compose?curmbox=F113739348&a=52ead962f177cc9728a56659fe7cba83&mailto=1&to=jamestims75@hotmail.com&msg=MSG1046586577.8&start=950955&len=4227&src=&type=x>
> >Subject: Ingram History
> >Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 08:43:39 -0600
> >
> >Hi Jim,
> >I have some of the information that you have listed but I want to compare
> >it with what I have because some of it doesn't make sense to me. For
> >instance they have Samuel and Ann marrying in 1760 this is impossible
> >because they had a son Jonathan, which is who we fall under, who was born
> >in 1756. Some researchs have tried to say that he was born in 1765 but
> >since he was in the revolutionary war he would not have been old enough
> >according to Mary Ruth Stulz. Anyway if what I have is correct I have
this
> >Samuel connecting to your line through Thomas Ingram as you fall under
> >Thomas's son John Sr. we fall under his son Charles who had a son John
who
> >married Hannah Pines. In John's will it does say he has a son named
Samuel
> >which from the will I presume he is his oldest son. I guess I do not
> >understand why people don't think this could be his son as it is the only
> >thing that I have come across that does make sense? Anyway if I find out
> >anything else I will let you know. Thanks so much for all the
inforamtion.
> >Barbara
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
