The Testaments of the new Order
The Truth is not relative. It does not depend on your acceptance of it in order for it to exist. Your acceptance of the Truth is not something that the Truth asks for or desires. If you choose to live in ignorance, that is your fault. There is no Heaven or Hell in the classical sense, there is only those who die in a state of flux, and those that do not. You have to have confidence in those things that you believe in, other wise you will not have the ability to keep calm at the end. We are all energy, and energy is never destroyed it only evolves and changes throughout our lives, and in our death that energy is released, if you choose to go with the release then you will see God, if however you resist, then your energy will permanently stay in a state of flux. 1. The Bible (Genesis) Deconstructing God: Chaos Theory I believe fundamentally that there are two ultimate powers in the universe. These powers are not “good” and “evil” because these terms have no definitive meaning and are subjective. Rather, the two opposing forces in the universe are order and chaos. What does this mean with regards to the natural order and the concept of ‘God?’ Simply put, as proclaimed by Judeo-Christian ethics and mores, the divine ruler of the universe, God, is a God of love. Love is in itself a subjective and undefinable term. What is “love?” Certainly, even I as an unbeliever am capable of that emotion, though I can’t elaborate truly what it means to ‘love.’ I know I love my wife and child, along with my extended family; I can’t however put this inexplicable feeling into words. There in lies the rub, if God is love, then he is by definition an emotion. Love defined: deep affection and warm feelings for another. Feelings: susceptibility to an emotional response. Emotion: 1 A strong feeling, as of joy, sorrow, or hate. 2 (more appropriately) a state of mental agitation or disturbance. Following this line of reasoning: God is love. Love is a deep affection and susceptibility to a state of mental agitation or disturbance. Therefore, I conclude that if God is love (and no Christian or Jew would argue he wasn’t) then God must be changing and susceptible to the wills of emotion. This brings on the only logical conclusion: God is not order, but the absence of order, confusion. Because love can never be a constant, (the way logic can), God must not therefore be considered the ultimate authority in the universe because eventually order will bring chaos under its control. But is that true, or is the universe more likely to move towards chaos over order? We as a people hope this is not the case. Human beings want to believe that order will eventually triumph over chaos. I am certain, however, that an astrophysicist would insist that looking at the universe from the perspective of infinity that the universe will eventually move towards entropy. The prevailing theory is that the universe will fold back in on itself and then cease to exist, at least in this dimension. If the universe then ceases to exist are we to define this state as a state of order or chaos? If time therefore is considered a construct of the universe, time itself will cease to exist when the universe ceases to exist. This creates a paradox of infinity, and therefore God. Perhaps a Christian might point out that this is only a theory, a theory of man, a therefore may not be true. This theory, that the universe will eventually collapse, however, is based on the fundamental principles of mathematics. Mathematics is based on undeniable, unchanging logic. Again logic is an absolute, unlike theories based on emotions. With considerations of the text of the Holy Bible, we must even when accepting the stories as allegorical, look to the pronouncements of the Lord. In Genesis God condemns the serpent for tempting Eve to eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge. Even taken allegorically, this tells us that God is against the very foundations of logic. Not logic as perceived by human beings, that is, human logic, but all forms of logic. At least God is against mankind having this kind of wisdom. This is evident in the claim the serpent makes to Eve in the garden: “Then the serpent said to the women, ‘You will not surely die. For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.’” (Genesis 3: 4-5). Was this a false statement by the serpent? Did the knowledge of good and evil bring about godhood for Adam and Eve (and as a consequent) mankind? Well, the Bible is clear on this issue in Genesis 3:22: “Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put out his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”— And there the verse ends. This is indeed making the connection that the ‘eating’ of the fruit from the tree of knowledge had brought about a comprehension, that is a self-awareness, a cognitive mindset that the inhabitants of the Garden of Eden did not have previously. They have in effect at that point moved towards a state of mind that is as it says, “like one of Us,” that is, like God. God then moves to prohibit mankind from obtaining complete godhood by obtaining eternal life: “So he drove out the man; and He placed cherubim at the east of the Garden of Eden, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life.”(Genesis 3:24). In the entire account of the Garden of Eden story, we are lead to believe, if not by the Bible itself, at least by the modern-day advocates (especially the Christians) of the story, that the serpent (which is never overtly referred to as the devil) is somehow deceiving Eve. Again we look at chapter 3 verses 4-5 to see what the serpent said to Eve: “Then the serpent said to the women, ‘You will not surely die. For God knows that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.’” We all know the account of the Garden of Eden. Did Eve upon ‘eating’ the fruit of the tree of knowledge die? The answer is no. Did the fruit open Eve’s eyes and therefore cause her to be “like God.” The answer, as already shown, is yes. Despite this, Eve tells God in Genesis 3:13 that: “…the serpent deceived me, and I ate.” The serpent is then cursed by God in Genesis 3:14. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, deceive is defined as follows: “to cause to believe what is not true; mislead.” Since the serpent said nothing that was untrue, it certainly cannot be called deception. What then are we to take from the account of the Garden of Eden? First, as clearly stated in the text, God is against mankind obtaining knowledge and logical reasoning. The serpent on the other hand actively takes an interest in mankind obtaining this knowledge without the consent of God. The serpent does not lie to Eve, but God does lie to Adam when he says in Genesis 2:17: “…but the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” A Christian may object by saying that God showed mercy on Adam and Eve and therefore did not kill them. This is an assumption, one that is not overtly stated in the book of Genesis. It is important also to note here that God does not say, “If you eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge I will kill you,” but states, “you shall surely die.” This story then supports the premise that God is against logic (and therefore order) and is willfully thrusting mankind throughout the Bible into a state of chaos. It is interesting that it is the devil, not God, that is described as being the instrument of evil (and therefore chaos) throughout the Bible. Yet, the Bible itself tells us the truth despite itself. We can see this also in a number of Biblical stories that have been told to us since our childhood. The conceptual frameworks that most Christians have with regards to these stories are very misleading. Take for example the story of the tower of Babel. Ask the average Christian to recount the story and it will go something like this: A group of people who all spoke the same language decided to build a tower to reach Heaven. God was angered because these people presumed to do something that was akin to trying to be like Him. He then confused their languages to prevent them from continuing to pursue this blasphemy. That’s a nice story, but is that how it went? What dose the Bible say God did when He saw that the men where building this tower? Again let’s go to the source: “But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. And the Lord said, ‘Indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them. Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.” (Genesis 11:5-7). Here we have the utopian society that poets and philosophers have dreamed of for years, a society working together as one. Why should this God care if these people were building a tower? The Bible tells us why, God feared that “nothing they propose to do will be withheld from them.” God stopped them from building the tower, not because mankind was being blasphemous, but because man was being industrious. Again, we can see God interfering with the natural progression of man. God’s fear of mankind is now that they not only possessed the intelligence to create, but the means to do so. He refuses to allow man to evolve to their natural state, because when they do he knows that they will no longer need Him. This is not love, but control. God’s emotions have got the better of Him and He uses his power against man. Again an emotional God forces men away from their own potential. It is again apparent that God is against the logic of man for His own selfish reasons. As a consequence, man is thrust again into ciaos. A Christian might object to this reasoned argument by saying that God was only preventing man from obtaining power that mankind could not handle. God was showing His love by dispersing the mob for its own good. An answer to that would be that if God truly loved man then He would allow them to advance to greater horizons. As the poet says: “If you love someone, set them free.” The story of Babel had come after another well known story from Genesis. Starting in chapter six we can see just how vengeful God can be. This is the setting for the great flood. God has decided to wipe the face of the Earth of mankind. What is it that is occurring on Earth for God to make this fateful decision? We turn back to Bible to elucidate: “Now it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose.” (Genesis 6: 1-2). It is up to interpretation to clarify who the ‘sons of God’ were. Of course, the standard belief is that they were ‘fallen angels.’ How angels and humans can conceive children is a mystery. This story probably has its roots in the mythology of Moses’ time. This explanation, unfortunately, leads one to believe that this story is most likely fictitious. For our edification here, I would like to assume the story to be true. If it is true, the offspring from such a union could only be described as demigods. Here again we see man striving to become like God, this time in a different way. The offspring here have considerable talents. They possess not only physical prowess, but as the following verse suggests, mental prowess as well: “There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.” (Genesis 6:4). It is unclear for what reason these men had become renowned. An assumption can be made that these men were superhuman, and therefore in positions of power. This possibility, of course, is not expressly made in this passage. The word “mighty,” (defined as the power or force held by a person or group) suggests such a possibility. The Earth is then destroyed by the great flood. There is little need to go into detail here; most people are familiar with Noah, the ark, and all the other details of the allegory. The story itself adds little to what I am attempting to convey here, which is what motivated the flood in the first place. Again we see that it is man striving to be like God that causes this ‘destruction.’ Again mankind is forced to succumb to the arbitrary will of a deity that insists on forcing them into compliance. Here we can plainly see that the Christian concept of ‘free will’ for mankind is based on duplicity. Mankind is really only free to serve God; the alternatives are far too grave to even contemplate. How can mankind have true free will if they are forced to obey or die a watery death? After the flood, God makes a covenant with Noah. Is it a contrite God that tells Noah that this will never happen again? After Noah builds an alter to the Lord and then offers up a sacrifice, it appears that God’s wrath has been quenched: “Then the Lord said in His heart, ‘I will never again curse the ground for man’s sake, although the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; nor will I again destroy every living as I have done.” (Genesis 8:20). Of course this verse flies in the face of Christian apocalyptic teaching, the Church then looks to Genesis 9:15 which states: “and I will remember My covenant which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh.” (Italics added). The Earth then will not be destroyed, the Christian contends by water. This leaves the door open for God to destroy the Earth in a different manner. Talk about having your cake and eating it too! God can be contrite for what He ‘had’ to do, and at the same time threaten any future violators. It begs the question; can man ever truly please this God? We see the nature of God throughout the first testament. It displeases him to feel obligated to come down to the level of man. For one reason or another, he seemed however to take a particular interest in one man who lived in the ancient city of Ur in Mesopotamia. This man was Abraham. Lucifer means ‘Enlightenment’. That is the expressed purpose of Lucifer. Do not confuse Lucifer with the Advisory, Satan. They are not the same being. I have web site links to help you to determine that. 2. The New Testimant From the beginning there were two powers: Order and Chaos. Order created the universe, Chaos created this world. They have lined up their men to do battle for the final fight, the one that will encompass all. For more information, please feel free to e-mail me, my email is on the bottom of the page. Please feel free to contact me, and the other websites I have as links. If you got this far, I am sure you will be able to continue well on your path to enlightenment. May the Light of Lucifer guide thy path.
These Websites Will Expand your Mind
Some light on Lucifer
More light about Lucifer
The true Mystic Jesus
Truth is in Physics
Prophesy
More about Reagan and Prophesy
The New Testament Apocrypha
The Old Testament Apocrypha
